Re: sysutils/lsof cannot fetch distfile ;;
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 18:22 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: see below;; jihad# make fetch === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/. fetch: http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2: Not Found [..] = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof. jihad# a few hours ago, i updated /usr/ports by cvsup.. what happened? I had this problem. It turned out that the problem, in my case, was that my ISP doesn't provide any reverse DNS, and this ftp site requires it. I see, and thank you! I've made it available at: http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 as well. Thank you, too! -- And I ain't gonna change. -- Nino Valenti, Chapter 13, page 184 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
If I run portmaster with the -a switch it now attempts to rebuild all installed ports rather than just those that need to be updated. Is this the new, correct behavior for -a or has something been busted? Zach ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
hideo wrote: If I run portmaster with the -a switch it now attempts to rebuild all installed ports rather than just those that need to be updated. It doesn't do that for me. Are you sure that you didn't use the -f switch as well? Or do you perhaps have FORCE=yes in /etc/portmaster.rc or ~/.portmasterrc? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
Sorry, missed ports@ on the last reply. Doug Barton (Sat 01/26/08 08:26): hideo wrote: If I run portmaster with the -a switch it now attempts to rebuild all installed ports rather than just those that need to be updated. It doesn't do that for me. Are you sure that you didn't use the -f switch as well? Or do you perhaps have FORCE=yes in /etc/portmaster.rc or ~/.portmasterrc? No sign of FORCE (don't have either of those files) and I rarely need -f. I invoked it with -aiGd: ~# portmaster -aiGd === Gathering distinfo list for installed ports === Starting check of installed ports for available updates === Update alac-0.1.3? [y] n === Update audacity-1.2.4b_2? [y] n === Update bcwipe-1.6.5_1? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Clui-1.40? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Pager-1.00? [y] n === Update keychain-2.6.8? [y] n === Update links-2.1.p28,1? [y] n === Update linuxthreads-2.2.3_23? [y] n === Update lsof-4.79H? [y] n === Update maildrop-2.0.4? [y] n === Update nrg2iso-0.4? [y] n === Update nvidia-xconfig-1.0_2? [y] n === Update openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1? [y] n === Update p5-MP3-Info-1.23? [y] n === Update p5-POE-0.? [y] n etc. If I remove -G it seems to do the right thing. Perhaps it's the behavior of -G that's changed? Zach ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:54:02 -0600, hideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, missed ports@ on the last reply. Doug Barton (Sat 01/26/08 08:26): hideo wrote: If I run portmaster with the -a switch it now attempts to rebuild all installed ports rather than just those that need to be updated. It doesn't do that for me. Are you sure that you didn't use the -f switch as well? Or do you perhaps have FORCE=yes in /etc/portmaster.rc or ~/.portmasterrc? No sign of FORCE (don't have either of those files) and I rarely need -f. I invoked it with -aiGd: ~# portmaster -aiGd === Gathering distinfo list for installed ports === Starting check of installed ports for available updates === Update alac-0.1.3? [y] n === Update audacity-1.2.4b_2? [y] n === Update bcwipe-1.6.5_1? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Clui-1.40? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Pager-1.00? [y] n === Update keychain-2.6.8? [y] n === Update links-2.1.p28,1? [y] n === Update linuxthreads-2.2.3_23? [y] n === Update lsof-4.79H? [y] n === Update maildrop-2.0.4? [y] n === Update nrg2iso-0.4? [y] n === Update nvidia-xconfig-1.0_2? [y] n === Update openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1? [y] n === Update p5-MP3-Info-1.23? [y] n === Update p5-POE-0.? [y] n etc. If I remove -G it seems to do the right thing. Perhaps it's the behavior of -G that's changed? Strange, I have NO_RECURSIVE_CONFIG=yes (-G) in my /etc/portmaster.rc and I can't reproduce it. % cat /etc/portmaster.rc DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=yes NO_RECURSIVE_CONFIG=yes NO_BACKUP=yes I have ran 'portmaster -a' recently and it went well. I have lsof installed too in here. Maybe it's -G combine with one of option that made different result? Or maybe just -i? -i interactive update mode -- ask whether to rebuild ports Cheers, Mezz Zach -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
Jeremy Messenger (Sat 01/26/08 12:13): On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:54:02 -0600, hideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, missed ports@ on the last reply. Doug Barton (Sat 01/26/08 08:26): hideo wrote: If I run portmaster with the -a switch it now attempts to rebuild all installed ports rather than just those that need to be updated. It doesn't do that for me. Are you sure that you didn't use the -f switch as well? Or do you perhaps have FORCE=yes in /etc/portmaster.rc or ~/.portmasterrc? No sign of FORCE (don't have either of those files) and I rarely need -f. I invoked it with -aiGd: ~# portmaster -aiGd === Gathering distinfo list for installed ports === Starting check of installed ports for available updates === Update alac-0.1.3? [y] n === Update audacity-1.2.4b_2? [y] n === Update bcwipe-1.6.5_1? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Clui-1.40? [y] n === Update bsdpan-Term-Pager-1.00? [y] n === Update keychain-2.6.8? [y] n === Update links-2.1.p28,1? [y] n === Update linuxthreads-2.2.3_23? [y] n === Update lsof-4.79H? [y] n === Update maildrop-2.0.4? [y] n === Update nrg2iso-0.4? [y] n === Update nvidia-xconfig-1.0_2? [y] n === Update openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1? [y] n === Update p5-MP3-Info-1.23? [y] n === Update p5-POE-0.? [y] n etc. If I remove -G it seems to do the right thing. Perhaps it's the behavior of -G that's changed? Strange, I have NO_RECURSIVE_CONFIG=yes (-G) in my /etc/portmaster.rc and I can't reproduce it. % cat /etc/portmaster.rc DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=yes NO_RECURSIVE_CONFIG=yes NO_BACKUP=yes I have ran 'portmaster -a' recently and it went well. I have lsof installed too in here. Maybe it's -G combine with one of option that made different result? Or maybe just -i? -i interactive update mode -- ask whether to rebuild ports I think you're right. -aG and -ai work as expected. Using -i and -G together produces the behavior. Zach ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel
Hi! After a long time, I've got a little free time and spent it working for portupgrade. A new version (2.4.0) was released. * Many bugs fixed (thanks to reporters). * At last I've finished rewriting code and portupgrade now controls all tasks (before some port installed without a portupgrade note). As a result portupgrade gathers all depends for a port. It spends a time for preparing in the beginning of a upgrade process. * I've change unused -c and -C options to allow run 'make config-conditional' and 'make config' (force options change) before all processing. Test the release please. To move from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel port, use the command: portupgrade -fo ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade If you'll want to back to stable porupgrade, use the command: portupgrade -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade-devel -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: de-acroread8 not starting any more
Thank you for answering. On 25.01.2008 13:08 (UTC+1), Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Rainer Hurling [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:53:01 +0100): Dear list, after recent updates of FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT and some ports (gnome, kde, xorg etc.) acroread8 (german version) does not start any more. I have this behaviour on two machines. Instead starting the program a message with backtrace information appears, see below. The error message is irritating because libc.so.6 is stored under /usr/local/lib/compat. On /lib/ there is the newer libc.so.7. Acroread is a linux program, so it is supposed to take the libs from /compat/linux/..., you need to take this as the base path instead of a plain / if you look for libs. Sorry, I should have known this. I am working with emulators/linux_base-f7-7. This is not the default linux base. Please revert to the default linux base and the default linux kernel emulation (2.4.2 instead of something else). If the problem persists, then the problem is probably within the userland. If it doesn't persist, then you've hit one of the problems with the non default linux kernel emulation. Yes, it is not the default base. But the first few days after appearance of the new port acroread8 all works fine with acroread. I reported on another thread to Hiroki Sato ... Now I changed back to default :-) --- acroread rm: cannot remove `/home/rhurlin/.adobe/Acrobat/8.0/Preferences/mozilla/prefs.js': Function not implemented This is strange... I wouldn't expect a Function not implemented for an rm. (acroread:1115): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library. Using the fallback 'C' locale. *** glibc detected *** /usr/local/Adobe/Reader8/DEU/Adobe/Reader8/bin/acroread: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x002ad9f8 *** This may be the cause of the previous error or not. All these errors went away after changing linux base from f7 back to fc4 (compat.linux.osrelease 2.4.2). Only the message about not supported locale remains. But this is a problem with gtk/gnome I think. Bye, Alexander. Thanks again, Rainer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi! After a long time, I've got a little free time and spent it working for portupgrade. A new version (2.4.0) was released. * Many bugs fixed (thanks to reporters). * At last I've finished rewriting code and portupgrade now controls all tasks (before some port installed without a portupgrade note). As a result portupgrade gathers all depends for a port. It spends a time for preparing in the beginning of a upgrade process. * I've change unused -c and -C options to allow run 'make config-conditional' and 'make config' (force options change) before all processing. Test the release please. To move from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel port, use the command: portupgrade -fo ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade If you'll want to back to stable porupgrade, use the command: portupgrade -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade-devel This breaks certain ports (portupgrade -a) that have multiple ports that can satisfy a depends. For example net-p2p/deulge depends on devel/boost but multimedia/miro depends on devel/boost-python. The only difference between boost and boost-python is boost-python sets the -DWITH_PYTHON flag and lists lang/python - -2.5 while boost does not depend on it and makes the user specify the above flag from the command line. Under the old portugrade it relied on miro and/or deluge to detect its own depends and since both did it by xDEP on the installed files either whould be accepted. Under the new one portupgrade attempts to build from index depends thus does not allow this interchangablity. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com Free software != Free beer Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHm736Qi2hk2LEXBARAmbEAJoDYNZ2SJI2zzGWIe/x8eNPdDOKHgCg0EJI tht21oM8mGdhdatMRP4yeFg= =MkU8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi! After a long time, I've got a little free time and spent it working for portupgrade. A new version (2.4.0) was released. Congrats on both the new version, and finding the time. :) This breaks certain ports (portupgrade -a) that have multiple ports that can satisfy a depends. For example net-p2p/deulge depends on devel/boost but multimedia/miro depends on devel/boost-python. The only difference between boost and boost-python is boost-python sets the -DWITH_PYTHON flag and lists lang/python -2.5 while boost does not depend on it and makes the user specify the above flag from the command line. Under the old portugrade it relied on miro and/or deluge to detect its own depends and since both did it by xDEP on the installed files either whould be accepted. Under the new one portupgrade attempts to build from index depends thus does not allow this interchangablity. I handled this in portmaster by analyzing the CONFLICTS. If a requested dependency has a CONFLICTS line I check the glob patterns against the installed ports with pkg_info and keep going if we already have something installed that will work. That's not a perfect solution, but it handles all the cases I've seen personally, or users complained about before that feature was introduced. hope this helps, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qiv quits with Gdk-ERROR on FreeBSD 6.3
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:41:37AM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:56:25 -0500 Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:19:17 +0100 Martin Tournoij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:19:26PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:38:59 +0100 Boris Hollas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I invoked qiv (quick image viewer) on an image file and got the following message: Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 115 error_code 8 request_code 2 minor_code 0 I installed qiv-2.0_2 from package on FreeBSD 6.3. On 6.1, I've used qiv without any problems. I switched to using a qiv development version (2.1) and this problem doesn't seem to exist there. Update to 2.1pre12: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119958 Please report if this version works for you. I made a clean install using the patch in PR119958. It displays images but it gives the following messages when run from the command line: $ qiv *.png IMLIB ERROR: SHM can't get SHM Identifier for Shared Pixmap Wrapper Falling back on Shared XImages IMLIB ERROR: SHM can't get SHM Identifier for Shared XImage Falling back on XImages I did a little more investigating and the above error only seems to happen for interlaced images, for example: freebsd-bikeshed.png: PNG image data, 3336 x 3666, 8-bit colormap, interlaced I put this image at: http://myfreebsd.homeunix.net/freebsd-bikeshed.png Converting the image to non-interlaced does not produce the imlib error. This same imlib error message exists in the qiv-2.0_2 version so its not new. The PR-119958 version works and is an improvement over the one in the tree. Randy It doesn't matter in which format the images is, it's the size that matters. It's not a bug, it's simply imlib running out of shared memory because of the large image size. You can fix this by increasing the sysctls kern.ipc.shmall and kern.ipc.shmmax (I set them to 4194304 and 7000). Regards, Martin Tournoij ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:10:50 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi! After a long time, I've got a little free time and spent it working for portupgrade. A new version (2.4.0) was released. * Many bugs fixed (thanks to reporters). * At last I've finished rewriting code and portupgrade now controls all tasks (before some port installed without a portupgrade note). As a result portupgrade gathers all depends for a port. It spends a time for preparing in the beginning of a upgrade process. * I've change unused -c and -C options to allow run 'make config-conditional' and 'make config' (force options change) before all processing. Test the release please. To move from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel port, use the command: portupgrade -fo ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade If you'll want to back to stable porupgrade, use the command: portupgrade -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade-devel This breaks certain ports (portupgrade -a) that have multiple ports that can satisfy a depends. For example net-p2p/deulge depends on devel/boost but multimedia/miro depends on devel/boost-python. The only difference between boost and boost-python is boost-python sets the -DWITH_PYTHON flag and lists lang/python - -2.5 while boost does not depend on it and makes the user specify the above flag from the command line. Under the old portugrade it relied on miro and/or deluge to detect its own depends and since both did it by xDEP on the installed files either whould be accepted. Under the new one portupgrade attempts to build from index depends thus does not allow this interchangablity. The boost and boost-python ports need to be fix, not other tools or other stuff. It will be great if you quit email me related with this as I am getting tired with this issue, thanks. Cheers, Mezz - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com Free software != Free beer Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHm736Qi2hk2LEXBARAmbEAJoDYNZ2SJI2zzGWIe/x8eNPdDOKHgCg0EJI tht21oM8mGdhdatMRP4yeFg= =MkU8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:25:01 -0600, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi! After a long time, I've got a little free time and spent it working for portupgrade. A new version (2.4.0) was released. Congrats on both the new version, and finding the time. :) This breaks certain ports (portupgrade -a) that have multiple ports that can satisfy a depends. For example net-p2p/deulge depends on devel/boost but multimedia/miro depends on devel/boost-python. The only difference between boost and boost-python is boost-python sets the -DWITH_PYTHON flag and lists lang/python -2.5 while boost does not depend on it and makes the user specify the above flag from the command line. Under the old portugrade it relied on miro and/or deluge to detect its own depends and since both did it by xDEP on the installed files either whould be accepted. Under the new one portupgrade attempts to build from index depends thus does not allow this interchangablity. I handled this in portmaster by analyzing the CONFLICTS. If a requested dependency has a CONFLICTS line I check the glob patterns against the installed ports with pkg_info and keep going if we already have something installed that will work. That's not a perfect solution, but it handles all the cases I've seen personally, or users complained about before that feature was introduced. I love this solution, I remember this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-August/034434.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-August/034579.html :-) Cheers, Mezz hope this helps, Doug -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change with portmaster's -a flag in v2.0?
hideo wrote: I think you're right. -aG and -ai work as expected. Using -i and -G together produces the behavior. Just to confirm, Zach and I worked this out in private e-mail as well, and that is indeed the problem. I have a fix for the -aiG case, I just need to test it for other cases as well. I should have the update in the tree tomorrow. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
