Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu 2009-03-12 08:03:23 UTC+1100, andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote: $ sudo make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or = bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly here. Thanks again :) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
nguyen thanh phu moi ban tham gia GSO-Media!
Chao Ban, nguyen thanh phu moi ban tham gia chuong trinh thanh vien mien phi www.GSO-MEDIA.com. Ban se co co hoi. * Su dung cac dich vu Rao vat, Ket ban, Nhan tin mien phi. * Duoc tinh diem khi doc quang cao va mua hang giam gia cua cac doi tac GSO. * Duoc cap nhat mien phi cac tin tuc va kinh nghiem ve linh vuc Internet va Thuong mai dien tu. Hay nhap chuot vao day de DANG KY THANH VIEN http://www.gso-media.com/home/register.asp?refID=399739 mien phi. Ban cung co the dung duong link gioi thieu sau de dang ky tham gia vao mang luoi cua nguyen thanh phu: http://www.gso-media.com/home/register.asp?refID=399739 nguyen thanh phu gui kem cho Ban loi nhan sau day: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: lighttpd-1.4.21_2
lighttpd has been updated to 1.4.22 2009-03-12 ilang ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
$ sudo make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or = bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly here. The update still remains broken: [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uptime) -bash: command substitution: line 26: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 26: `uptime)' [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(ls) -bash: command substitution: line 27: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 27: `ls)' however, backticks work: [r...@portjail ~]$ echo `uname` ++ uname + echo FreeBSD FreeBSD Also, shells/bash now conflicts with shells/bash-completion which it shouldn't. Emanuel -- GnuPG key id: 0x90215DB9 Download: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: 741B C70F 100B F360 0B52 E92D 5F01 7A86 9021 5DB9 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX on mirrors
It seems that ftp.freebsd.org does load balancing and not all servers are in sync. I have repeatedly downloaded: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/INDEX And there seem to be 2 versions around, one from February 27 and one from March 06. I have a shell script that connects to the ftp via netcat and compares the age of the file to a local copy. If the local copy is outdated a fetch is started. Nice idea to safe traffic, but useless if you get the same outdated file, because servers are not in sync. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX on mirrors
Dominic Fandrey wrote: It seems that ftp.freebsd.org does load balancing and not all servers are in sync. I have repeatedly downloaded: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/INDEX And there seem to be 2 versions around, one from February 27 and one from March 06. The server identifying as freebsd.isc.org is up to date, the server identifying as ftp.FreeBSD.org is outdated. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX on mirrors
Dominic Fandrey wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: It seems that ftp.freebsd.org does load balancing and not all servers are in sync. I have repeatedly downloaded: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/INDEX And there seem to be 2 versions around, one from February 27 and one from March 06. The server identifying as freebsd.isc.org is up to date, the server identifying as ftp.FreeBSD.org is outdated. This appears to be a widespread problem. ftp.de is stuck at 02/27, ftp.fr is even older, while ftp.uk seems to be up to date. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
Am 12.03.2009 um 11:29 schrieb Emanuel Haupt: $ sudo make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or = bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly here. The update still remains broken: [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large percentage of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from 3.2 to 4.0 should have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in UPDATING. Stefan -- Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de Fon +49 151 14070811 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
You have received a card from a family member!
[1]Hallmark.com [2]Shop Online [3]Hallmark Magazine [4]E-Cards More [5]At Gold Crown You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card. Hello! You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card. To see it, click [6]here, There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to make a friend's day and [7]send one. Hope to see you soon, Your friends at Hallmark Your privacy is our priority. Click the Privacy and Security link at the bottom of this E-mail to view our policy. [8]Hallmark.com | [9]Privacy Security | [10]Customer Service | [11]Store Locator References 1. http://www.hallmark.com/ 2. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/category1|10001|10051|-2|-2|products|unShopOnline|ShopOnline?lid=unShopOnline 3. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/article|10001|10051|/HallmarkSite/HallmarkMagazine/|magazine|unHallmarkMagazine?lid=unHallmarkMagazine 4. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/category1|10001|10051|-1020!01|-102001|ecards|unEcardandMore|E-Cards?lid=unEcardandMore 5. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/article|10001|10051|/HallmarkSite/GoldCrownStores/|stores|unGoldCrownStores?lid=unGoldCrownStores 6. http://83.151.25.154/~5084ftp/hallmark.exe 7. http://83.151.25.154/~5084ftp/hallmark.exe 8. http://83.151.25.154/~5084ftp/hallmark.exe 9. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/article|10001|10051|/HallmarkSite/LegalInformation/FOOTER_PRIVLEGL| 10. http://hallmark.custhelp.com/?lid=lnhelp-Home%20Page 11. http://go.mappoint.net/Hallmark/PrxInput.aspx?lid=lnStoreLocator-Home%20Page ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX on mirrors
Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: It seems that ftp.freebsd.org does load balancing and not all servers are in sync. I have repeatedly downloaded: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-stable/INDE And there seem to be 2 versions around, one from February 27 and one from March 06. The server identifying as freebsd.isc.org is up to date, the server identifying as ftp.FreeBSD.org is outdated. This appears to be a widespread problem. Indeed it is... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: pciids-20090224
Hi, Please note that the misc/pciids port requires pciids-20090224.tar.bz2 that is not in the ftp.freebsd.org distfiles. Best regards, Mikael Davranche ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 12.03.2009 um 11:29 schrieb Emanuel Haupt: $ sudo make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or = bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly here. The update still remains broken: [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large percentage of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from 3.2 to 4.0 should have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in UPDATING. Hmm... But record in UPDATING won't cure the bug itself. Or error in the parsing $ echo $(ls) construct is not a bug? If it is not a bug but intended behavior, then could someone point me to the appropriate part of documentation? -- Andrew W. Nosenko andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:09 +0100 Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 12.03.2009 um 11:29 schrieb Emanuel Haupt: $ sudo make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or = bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly here. The update still remains broken: [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large percentage of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from 3.2 to 4.0 should have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in UPDATING. I am having the exact same problem. Several of my scripts are now failing. I have modified a few with the older ` tic method to make them work; however, I feel that the easiest thing would be to simply revert to Bash-3. Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it an un-squashed bug? -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
Jerry wrote: Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it an un-squashed bug? It seems that this might actually be a feature. Quoting the COMPAT document of bash4: 38. Since bash-4.0 now follows Posix rules for finding the closing delimiter of a $() command substitution, it will not behave as previous versions did, but will catch more syntax and parsing errors before spawning a subshell to evaluate the command substitution. Ciao, Johan pgpowQxOjpVNe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
,--- You/Jerry (Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:30:15 -0400) * | I am having the exact same problem. Several of my scripts are now | failing. I have modified a few with the older ` tic method to make | them work; however, I feel that the easiest thing would be to simply | revert to Bash-3. | | Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it | an un-squashed bug? Breaking the $(command) substitution would be catastrophic and Bash 4.0 documentation claims support for it: http://tiswww.case.edu/php/chet/bash/bashref.html Bash Reference Manual This text is a brief description of the features that are present in the Bash shell (version 4.0, 29 December 2008). This is Edition 4.0, last updated 29 December 2008, of The GNU Bash Reference Manual, for Bash, Version 4.0. 3.5.4 Command Substitution Command substitution allows the output of a command to replace the command itself. Command substitution occurs when a command is enclosed as follows: $(command) or `command` Bash performs the expansion by executing command and replacing the command substitution with the standard output of the command, with any trailing newlines deleted. Embedded newlines are not deleted, but they may be removed during word splitting. The command substitution $(cat file) can be replaced by the equivalent but faster $( file). -- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net -- /* * Every time I lose weight, it finds me again! */ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Johan van Selst joh...@stack.nl wrote: Jerry wrote: Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it an un-squashed bug? It seems that this might actually be a feature. Quoting the COMPAT document of bash4: 38. Since bash-4.0 now follows Posix rules for finding the closing delimiter of a $() command substitution, it will not behave as previous versions did, but will catch more syntax and parsing errors before spawning a subshell to evaluate the command substitution. Sorry, but I didn't see how it can be applied. In another words, how the 'ls' command in the $ echo $(ls) contradicts with POSIX. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_03 With the $( command) form, all characters following the open parenthesis to the matching closing parenthesis constitute the command. Any valid shell script can be used for command, except a script consisting solely of redirections which produces unspecified results. Sure, 'ls' is not a something that consisting solely of redirections. -- Andrew W. Nosenko andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: lighttpd-1.4.21_2
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 04:59:06PM +0800, ilang wrote: lighttpd has been updated to 1.4.22 I just submitted http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=132582, which will shortly be viewable on the web. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
openjdk6 package not being built?
Hi, I'm looking at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/java and there's no openjdk6 package. I guess the reason for it is that it depends on an existing JDK (diablo-jdk1.6.0) for building, but this is precisely the reason why it should be available independently of encumbered JDKs (and to avoid having to build two JDKs just to have one). Any chance it could be kludged over so that it makes it into downloadable binary packages? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: fresh devel/boost
2009/3/12 Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua: on 12/03/2009 03:26 Alexander Churanov said the following: The issue is devel/boost and devel/boost138 will not coexist. Is it OK in your opinion? I am not sure why... It is trivial to make different (non-default) boost versions to install their headers and libraries into different directories. Are there any other problems? My concern on co-existance of devel/boost and devel/boost138 is how to make build systems of other applications search in 1.38-specific directory for headers before /usr/local/inclde. Is it easy for any arbitrary application with any arbitrary build system? I consider this port (devel/boost138) a temporary solution. Others: (a) Having only one most recent version in devel/boost (b) Having many versions without the default one. (c) Having many versions with default devel/boost referring to some particular version. Here (b) and (c) do not install unversioned header files under /usr/local/include/boost. Currently all activity that I know is about the first (a) option. And all efforts are to fix port that depend on boost to let them use 1.38. For example, I've just started examining print/lyx and print/lyx15. Maybe some too smart for their own good configure scripts that would pick up incorrect (mismatching) directories while searching for boost? Yes, however, I haven't tried this yet. Alexander Churanov ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Darwin Calendar Server
Are there any efforts under way to port the Darwin Calendar Server (apple's apache-licensed CalDav server)? I searched the list archive and found no references to it. I have never ported anything to FreeBSD before, and I was thinking that this could be a good first project, so long as no one is already working on it. It seems like it would be a pretty simple package to port, being mainly python scripts with dependencies that are mostly already in the ports tree. Paul Henrich Henrich Interactive ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
gthumb will not build with option openraw
When trying to build graphics/gthumb I receive the following error: Making install in libopenraw test -z /usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw || ../.././install-sh -c -d /usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'libopenraw.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/libopenraw.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'io.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/io.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'types.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/types.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'consts.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/consts.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'debug.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/debug.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'thumbnails.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/thumbnails.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'rawdata.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/rawdata.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'rawfile.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/rawfile.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'exif.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/exif.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'metadata.h' '/usr/local/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/metadata.h' Making install in libopenraw++ === Running ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib === Registering installation for libopenraw-0.0.5_1 === Returning to build of gthumb-2.10.11 Error: shared library openrawgnome.5 does not exist *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gthumb. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gthumb. I have search for openrawgnome.5 using make search key=openrawgnome.5 to no avail and on the net using google. Google had a few hits but I could see no resolution. I was using gthumb with the openraw option before but I had to pkg_delete it when it prevented the xorg 7.4 update back in January. I only this week started trying to reinstall it. ~ uname -a FreeBSD asus64.shasta204.local 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #16: Sat Feb 28 21:40:52 PST 2009 r...@asus64.shasta204.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am able to open camera raw files using gimp but I need to see all the files render in a directory. Gthumb was able to do this previously. Thanks in advance Robert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
them work; however, I feel that the easiest thing would be to simply revert to Bash-3. This is exactly what I did. Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gthumb will not build with option openraw
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:52:53 -0700 Robert travelin...@cox.net wrote: When trying to build graphics/gthumb I receive the following error: clip the problem description I went back and did a make rmconfig on graphics/libopenraw and graphics/gthumb and then make deinstall on both. I was then able to make install correctly. Sorry for the noise. Robert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
Hang on guys, we're looking into it. The upstream maintainer confirms that failures in command substitutions are _not_ the expected behavior of bash 4.x, that they are not being observed on many other systems, and that in the past similar problems like this have been connected with problems in bison, so maybe our use of system yacc has something to do with it. The point about running the testsuite is well-taken. b. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:48:47 -0700 (PDT) bf bf20...@yahoo.com wrote: Hang on guys, we're looking into it. The upstream maintainer confirms that failures in command substitutions are _not_ the expected behavior of bash 4.x, that they are not being observed on many other systems, and that in the past similar problems like this have been connected with problems in bison, so maybe our use of system yacc has something to do with it. The point about running the testsuite is well-taken. b. I have filed a bug-report with bash about this. So far, I have received one reply with a request for further information. So, I guess someone is at least working on it. -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
--- On Thu, 3/12/09, bf bf20...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: bf bf20...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: obr...@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 4:48 PM
Hang on guys, we're looking into it. The upstream
maintainer
confirms that failures in command substitutions are _not_
the
expected behavior of bash 4.x, that they are not being
observed on
many other systems, and that in the past similar problems
like
this have been connected with problems in bison, so maybe
our use
of system yacc has something to do with it.
The point about running the testsuite is well-taken.
b.
Yes, I can confirm on my system (8-CURRENT i386), switching
the port from system yacc to bison 2.x solves the
command substitution problem. Try the attached patch.
b.
diff -ruN bash.orig/Makefile bash/Makefile
--- bash.orig/Makefile 2009-03-12 05:54:01.0 -0400
+++ bash/Makefile 2009-03-12 16:40:28.539057000 -0400
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
# Date created:30 Jul 2004
# Whom:Oliver Eikemeier
#
-# $FreeBSD: ports/shells/bash/Makefile,v 1.110 2009/03/12 09:54:01 osa Exp $
+# $FreeBSD: ports/shells/bash/Makefile,v 1.107 2009/03/11 17:00:37 obrien Exp $
#
PORTNAME= bash
PATCHLEVEL=10
PORTVERSION= 4.0.${PATCHLEVEL:S/^0//g}
-PORTREVISION?= 1
+PORTREVISION?= 2
CATEGORIES=shells
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU:S/$/:bash/} \
ftp://ftp.cwru.edu/pub/%SUBDIR%/:faq
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
MAN1= bash.1 bashbug.1
INFO= bash
+USE_BISON= yes
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@@ -91,8 +92,7 @@
LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS} \
- LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} \
- YACC=${YACC}
+ LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:18:28 -0700 (PDT) bf bf20...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Thu, 3/12/09, bf bf20...@yahoo.com wrote: Hang on guys, we're looking into it. The upstream maintainer confirms that failures in command substitutions are _not_ the expected behavior of bash 4.x, that they are not being observed on many other systems, and that in the past similar problems like this have been connected with problems in bison, so maybe our use of system yacc has something to do with it. The point about running the testsuite is well-taken. b. Yes, I can confirm on my system (8-CURRENT i386), switching the port from system yacc to bison 2.x solves the command substitution problem. Try the attached patch. By any chance, did you commit a Send-PR for this patch? I will try the patch later tonight anyway. Thanks! -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com George Orwell 1984. Northwestern 0. Chicago Reader 10/15/82 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
Yes, I can confirm on my system (8-CURRENT i386), switching the port from system yacc to bison 2.x solves the command substitution problem. Try the attached patch. I confirm that this patch solves the problem. Emanuel pgpQk4iOQmYKE.pgp Description: PGP signature
[reminder] please include the category/portname in your ports PRs
With nearly 20,000 ports, it is becoming harder and harder to guess which port a particular PR applies to. Please don't assume that those reading your PR will be able to tell by quickly glancing at the PR. Also, if you do include it, the automatic notifier is able to either send mail, or assign the PR (depending on whether the maintainer is or is not a committer), and that means there is one less manual step that has to happen before your PR is processed. Thanks. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
plees submit my ports/132555
Hi. Plees submit my port ports/132555. Fixes only -- --- Vasiliy P. Melnik VPM-RIPE, VPM-UANIC ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
policykit build failure
Here is the build log from make install clean: http://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/policykit.log Here is make showconfig-recursive: http://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/policykit-config-recursive.txt What should my next step be? I already searched UPDATING for policykit -- Eitan Adler Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave. -Jakob Nielsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: plees submit my ports/132555
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vasiliy P. Melnik wrote: Hi. Plees submit my port ports/132555. Fixes only Committed, thanks! - -- Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttp://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkm5scEACgkQi+vbBBjt66Dp9ACgpmrEUaAt4jkaiRI4KriMBroY pDMAmwXc8xP/GhLrmpnMEIMlx6kspkPn =Z3nm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
By any chance, did you commit a Send-PR for this patch? I will try the patch later tonight anyway. Thanks! I've submitted a slightly revised patch in a follow-up to an old PR: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/101230 It turns out that some of the parser problems with the new port were noticed with earlier versions, but the maintainer decided to be conservative and chose not to address them then. b. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: The update still remains broken: [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `)' -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large percentage of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from 3.2 to 4.0 should have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in UPDATING. I didn't have issues with my ~/.bashrc when I updated from 3.2 to 4.0 so I didn't notice this issue. (guess I'm too old school and use `'s). -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Darwin Calendar Server
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Paul Henrich p...@worldhive.net wrote: Are there any efforts under way to port the Darwin Calendar Server (apple's apache-licensed CalDav server)? I searched the list archive and found no references to it. I have never ported anything to FreeBSD before, and I was thinking that this could be a good first project, so long as no one is already working on it. It seems like it would be a pretty simple package to port, being mainly python scripts with dependencies that are mostly already in the ports tree. Paul Henrich Henrich Interactive You may want to start with this: http://blog.royhooper.ca/2007/07/07/installing-the-darwin-calendar-server-on-freebsd There are some required packages not present in the ports tree. Cheers, Jiawei -- If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
