SEO Process - Search Engine Optimization for Newbies
[1]BNBuzz.com Sharing Knowledge [2]SEO Process - Search Engine Optimization for Newbies Search engine optimization (SEO) is tricky. Must separate fact from fiction Search engine optimization (SEO) comes into play when even a well designed site cannot attract the potential customers and gains traffic that it should. Basic purpose of search engine optimization (SEO) is to ensure that your website is easily accessible and visible to search engines, drive quality traffic and help to convert the traffic into a successful lead. SEO helps you make your pages more attractive to search engines that obviously increases your rankings on Google and other search engines which ultimately generate more traffic, more customers and better conversion rate. Considering the fact that a website one Google page 1 attracts more traffic than a site on page 5 or 6. If your website is not hitting the page 1 especially for Google search results, youre definitely losing a chance to maximize your business and new lead generation. Besides high rankings and traffic, search engine optimization (SEO) gives you added benefits like Branding, quality leads, less expensive advertising opportunities etc [3]Read the full Story Related posts: 1. [4]Search Engine Optimization (SEO) 2. [5]Search Engine Marketing (SEM) 3. [6]Increase Targeted Website Traffic Free You are receiving this email because on Apr 04, 2009 02:21 am at [7]BNBuzz.com you subscribed to receive our e-newsletters. You can modify your subscription via clicking [8]here Copyright [9]BNBuzz.com [10]BNBuzz.com - Sharing knowledge across the world. References 1. http://www.bnbuzz.com/ 2. http://www.bnbuzz.com/seo-process-search-engine-optimization-for-newbies.html 3. http://www.bnbuzz.com/seo-process-search-engine-optimization-for-newbies.html 4. http://www.bnbuzz.com/search-engine-optimization-seo.html 5. http://www.bnbuzz.com/search-engine-marketing-sem.html 6. http://www.bnbuzz.com/increase-targeted-website-traffic-free.html 7. http://www.bnbuzz.com/ 8. http://www.bnbuzz.com/manage-subscription?u=07de4ec8433871ccff8b806cfa4b8cff4641046410 9. http://www.bnbuzz.com/ 10. http://www.bnbuzz.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Installing files to PREFIX and LINUXBASE - is it possible?
Hi,
I'm trying to create port of linux version of Gens (Sega Genesis/CD/32X
emulator). Benefits of using linux version are most recent release and
ability to run it on amd64 (native version doesn't compile on amd64).
However, I need to install binary to PREFIX and some files should go to
/usr/share/gens (paths are hardcoded, checked with ktrace, gens is
trying to open /usr/share/gens/ or
/compat/linux/usr/share/gens/), and installing to /usr isn't
really an option, so LINUXBASE/usr/share/gens looks like an only choice.
Installing everything under LINUXBASE doesn't look like option too -
"/compat/linux/usr/bin" isn't in path by default.
Is it possible at all (and welcomed) and how would I create pkg-plist in
this case or are there any other solutions?
I've attached shar of what's there at the moment (with incorrect
pkg-plist).
TIA,
Yuri
# This is a shell archive. Save it in a file, remove anything before
# this line, and then unpack it by entering "sh file". Note, it may
# create directories; files and directories will be owned by you and
# have default permissions.
#
# This archive contains:
#
# linux-gens
# linux-gens/distinfo
# linux-gens/pkg-descr
# linux-gens/Makefile
# linux-gens/pkg-plist
#
echo c - linux-gens
mkdir -p linux-gens > /dev/null 2>&1
echo x - linux-gens/distinfo
sed 's/^X//' >linux-gens/distinfo << '035edacc1a6d34536aae18d639f8c2c7'
XMD5 (gens-2.15.5-1.fc8.i386.rpm) = 96fac43c726ad49c7e6a6507fab8e44d
XSHA256 (gens-2.15.5-1.fc8.i386.rpm) =
38c26f94ebcfe37f87148a0e0282f39d6e638f4b1b2e174add0bac82055fc6dd
XSIZE (gens-2.15.5-1.fc8.i386.rpm) = 531596
035edacc1a6d34536aae18d639f8c2c7
echo x - linux-gens/pkg-descr
sed 's/^X//' >linux-gens/pkg-descr << '9888e24c3cf4c862c25a596f64fcb532'
XA Sega Genesis/CD/32X emulator that uses the SDL library and has a GTK
Xuser interface (Linux version).
X
XWWW: http://gens.sourceforge.net
9888e24c3cf4c862c25a596f64fcb532
echo x - linux-gens/Makefile
sed 's/^X//' >linux-gens/Makefile << '0da366ce2b483856510ecbaa96b5d034'
X# New ports collection makefile for: linux-gens
X# Date created:2009-06-09
X# Whom:Yuri Pankov
X#
X# $FreeBSD$
X#
X
XPORTNAME= gens
XPORTVERSION= 2.15.5
XCATEGORIES=emulators linux
XMASTER_SITES= http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/8/i386/
XPKGNAMEPREFIX= linux-
XDISTFILES= gens-2.15.5-1.fc8.i386.rpm
XEXTRACT_ONLY=
X
XMAINTAINER=yuri.pan...@gmail.com
XCOMMENT= Sega Genesis/CD/32X emulator (Linux version)
X
XEXTRACT_DEPENDS= rpm2cpio:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm
X
XCONFLICTS= gens-2.*
X
XRPMFILE= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-1.fc8.i386.rpm
X
XONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386 amd64
XUSE_LINUX= yes
XUSE_LINUX_APPS=gtk2 sdl12 dri
X
XNO_BUILD= yes
XNO_WRKSUBDIR= yes
X
XPLIST_SUB= LINUXBASE=${LINUXBASE}
X
Xdo-extract:
X ${MKDIR} ${WRKSRC}
X cd ${WRKSRC} && rpm2cpio ${DISTDIR}/${RPMFILE} | ${CPIO} -id
X
Xdo-install:
X ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/usr/bin/gens ${PREFIX}/bin
X ${MKDIR} ${LINUXBASE}/usr/share/gens
X ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/usr/share/gens/*
${LINUXBASE}/usr/share/gens
X
X.include
0da366ce2b483856510ecbaa96b5d034
echo x - linux-gens/pkg-plist
sed 's/^X//' >linux-gens/pkg-plist << '93a35c8901f5205cffdd5dd3523b52d8'
Xbin/gens
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/ksysguard.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp0.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/binary.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/package_settings.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/sonic2.ico
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/gens.ico
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/2rightarrow.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/gens_big.bmp
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/folder_slin_open.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp6.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp1.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/sonic.ico
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/history.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/password.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/Gens2.ico
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/reload.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/gens_small.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/xpaint.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/kmix.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bitmap1.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/file_text.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/viewmag.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp2.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp5.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/Modem.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/memory.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/viewmag1.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/cdrom2_unmount.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/editcopy.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp4.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/bmp3.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/package_games.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/filleclose.png
X%%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens/resource.png
x...@dirrm %%LINUXBASE%%/usr/share/gens
93a35c8901f5205cffdd5dd3523b52d8
exit
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 12:52:36 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:44:42PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:26:47 Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method)
> > > so be patient.
> >
> > Does pkg_which use the pkgdb? If so, maybe we could have pkg_info grow a
> > cache for future encounters, or we can create one:
>
> My guess is that pkg_which is using pkgdb, which is why it is
> significantly faster.
>
> > % grep -v '^@' /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS >/tmp/pkg_info.cache
> > % FOUND=`sed -ne 's,^/var/db/pkg/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:lib/python2.6/site-
> > packages/xcbgen/error.py$,\1,p' /tmp/pkg_info.cache`; echo $FOUND
> > xcb-proto-1.4
> >
> > So:
> > 's,^${PKG_DBDIR}/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:$$f$$,\1,p'
>
> I think there is a SoC project in the works to make our pkg utilities
> much better. I don't know any of the details but I can only hope that
> speed is one of the things being improved.
True, however the above can be done now, though it's a bit tricky to squeeze
into the find command, one could put this as shell script in files/pkg_which.
And patch Makefile as attached.
I haven't got a system to run this on, since I switched to 2.6 everywhere a
long time ago, but the find command on the shell produced the desired output.
> > > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff
> >
> > What's this for?
> > +JOBS= sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus
> >
> > Should be != if it's gonna be used, but it's not referenced anywhere else
> > that I can see.
>
> It's used in XARGS_CMD to provide a bit of parallelism in an effort to
> be a bit faster.
That was pretty blind of me.
--
Mel
Index: python/Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/lang/python/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.161
diff -u -r1.161 Makefile
--- python/Makefile 31 Jul 2007 16:28:32 - 1.161
+++ python/Makefile 10 Jun 2009 23:03:32 -
@@ -24,8 +24,19 @@
@${DO_NADA}
# Major upgrade support
-PORTUPGRADE_CMD?= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/portupgrade
-PKG_WHICH_CMD?= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/pkg_which
+PORTUPGRADE_CMD= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/portupgrade
+PKG_WHICH_CMD= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/pkg_which
+XARGS_CMD= ${XARGS} -0
+
+.if defined(USE_PORTMASTER)
+PORTUPGRADE_CMD= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/portmaster
+PORTUPGRADE_ARGS?= ""
+PKG_WHICH_CMD= ${SETENV} LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} PKG_DBDIR=${PKG_DBDIR} \
+ ${SH} ${FILESDIR}/pkg_which
+JOBS= sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus
+XARGS_CMD= ${XARGS} -L 1 -0 -P $$(${JOBS})
+.endif
+
upgrade-site-packages:
@if [ ! -x ${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} ]; then \
${ECHO_MSG} "Please install ports-mgmt/portupgrade."; \
@@ -36,14 +47,21 @@
if [ -d ${PREFIX}/lib/python$$ver ]; then \
UPD=`${FIND} ${PREFIX}/lib/python$$ver \
-type f -print0 | \
-${XARGS} -0 ${PKG_WHICH_CMD} | \
+${XARGS_CMD} ${PKG_WHICH_CMD} | \
${GREP} -Fv '?' | \
${EGREP} -v '^python2?[0-5]?-2' | \
${SORT} -u`; \
if [ "$$UPD" ]; then \
-${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} -f $$UPD; \
+if [ -n ${PORTUPGRADE_ARGS} ]; then \
+ ${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} ${PORTUPGRADE_ARGS} -f $$UPD; \
+else \
+ ${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} -f $$UPD; \
+fi; \
fi; \
fi; \
- done \
+ done
+.if defined(USE_PORTMASTER)
+ ${PKG_WHICH_CMD} -r
+.endif
.include
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Update for devel/boost is ready
Hi folks! Update for devel/boost is ready. Main changes are splitting into several ports and updating to 1.39. No more conflicts with Boost.Python! See http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject for details. You are interested in reviewing changes, follow the next procedure: 1) Unpack the http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-ports-20090609.tar.bz2 tarball into /usr/ports/devel 2) Apply patch http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-2009-05-29-15-47.diff to /usr/ports 3) Remove ports devel/boost and devel/boost-python Sincerely, Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Request for exp-run (devel/boost)
Folks, I've created an update for devel/boost, but did not verify that ALL software that depends on it builds and runs successfully. Some ports are really huge, like OpenOffice or KDE. Could we have and exp-run for updated devel/boost? To update ports, follow the next procedure: 1) Unpack the http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-ports-20090609.tar.bz2 tarball into /usr/ports/devel 2) Apply patch http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-2009-05-29-15-47.diff to /usr/ports 3) Remove ports devel/boost and devel/boost-python Sincerely, Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:26:47AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. > > Once applied you should be able to use: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine > with over 1000 ports installed. > > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > I think using "-f" switch with portmaster is not correct as it will unconditionally rebuild all dependencies also (often up to perl :). 0.02$, Alexey. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:52:36 -0400
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:44:42PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:26:47 Wesley Shields wrote:
> >
> > > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal
> > > method) so be patient.
> >
> > Does pkg_which use the pkgdb? If so, maybe we could have pkg_info
> > grow a cache for future encounters, or we can create one:
>
> My guess is that pkg_which is using pkgdb, which is why it is
> significantly faster.
>
> > % grep -v '^@' /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS >/tmp/pkg_info.cache
> > % FOUND=`sed -ne
> > 's,^/var/db/pkg/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:lib/python2.6/site-
> > packages/xcbgen/error.py$,\1,p' /tmp/pkg_info.cache`; echo $FOUND
> > xcb-proto-1.4
> >
> > So:
> > 's,^${PKG_DBDIR}/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:$$f$$,\1,p'
>
> I think there is a SoC project in the works to make our pkg utilities
> much better. I don't know any of the details but I can only hope that
> speed is one of the things being improved.
>
> > > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff
> >
> > What's this for?
> > +JOBS= sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus
> >
> > Should be != if it's gonna be used, but it's not referenced
> > anywhere else that I can see.
If we'd be using != that particular instruction would be executed each
time something interacts with the port, including eg. mkake describe
(part of make index).
This way that piece of code is executed only when needed.
(and yes, it is referenced further bellow).
> It's used in XARGS_CMD to provide a bit of parallelism in an effort to
> be a bit faster. In my opinion the number can be increased much
> further than kern.smp.cpus but I'm not in a position to figure out
> how far to push it. The value used is better than nothing.\
Probably x2 would be OK.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: garr sourceforge mirror is broken
Dmitry Marakasov writes: > Seems like garr sourceforge mirror is broken. Not just for transfig - I got a complaint about zsh this morning. I took a closer look at the corrupted file. There's a 128 kB block starting at offset 0x0017e000 that's corrupted; the rest of the file is fine. Probably filesystem corruption; that's what they get for not using ZFS ;) BTW, it looks like SourceForge have removed that server from their list of mirrors. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:44:42PM -0800, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:26:47 Wesley Shields wrote:
>
> > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so
> > be patient.
>
> Does pkg_which use the pkgdb? If so, maybe we could have pkg_info grow a
> cache
> for future encounters, or we can create one:
My guess is that pkg_which is using pkgdb, which is why it is
significantly faster.
> % grep -v '^@' /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS >/tmp/pkg_info.cache
> % FOUND=`sed -ne 's,^/var/db/pkg/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:lib/python2.6/site-
> packages/xcbgen/error.py$,\1,p' /tmp/pkg_info.cache`; echo $FOUND
> xcb-proto-1.4
>
> So:
> 's,^${PKG_DBDIR}/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:$$f$$,\1,p'
I think there is a SoC project in the works to make our pkg utilities
much better. I don't know any of the details but I can only hope that
speed is one of the things being improved.
> > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff
>
> What's this for?
> +JOBS=sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus
>
> Should be != if it's gonna be used, but it's not referenced anywhere else
>
> that I can see.
It's used in XARGS_CMD to provide a bit of parallelism in an effort to
be a bit faster. In my opinion the number can be increased much further
than kern.smp.cpus but I'm not in a position to figure out how far to
push it. The value used is better than nothing.
-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
Wesley Shields schreef: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. Once applied you should be able to use: cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine with over 1000 ports installed. [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. -- WXS Still not :-( : # patch >> /var/db/pkg/-f does not exist ===>>> Aborting update *** Signal 15 Terminated Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. # portmaster-2.7, python-2.6,2 and python26-2.6.2 are installed. This is on 7.2-RELEASE/i386 with portsnap tree as of "now". The patch was only tested with PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined. In the case where it wasn't defined you would run into the issue you described. I think I've fixed it now, so please revert and try again. Sorry for the problems, but like I said earlier this is to get it more exposure. Please revert, fetch the patch again and apply. It now also works fine without PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined, i.e. just # ( cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER ) Thank you. I'll wait till tomorrow morning (about 24 hours from when I started this thread) before I commit. If anyone has any more feedback, positive or negative please let me know. The latest patch also works fine on my 7.2-RELEASE/amd64 which has xorg-7.4 and xfce-4.6.1 installed. Regards, Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:26:47 Wesley Shields wrote:
> It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so
> be patient.
Does pkg_which use the pkgdb? If so, maybe we could have pkg_info grow a cache
for future encounters, or we can create one:
% grep -v '^@' /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS >/tmp/pkg_info.cache
% FOUND=`sed -ne 's,^/var/db/pkg/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:lib/python2.6/site-
packages/xcbgen/error.py$,\1,p' /tmp/pkg_info.cache`; echo $FOUND
xcb-proto-1.4
So:
's,^${PKG_DBDIR}/\(.*\)/+CONTENTS:$$f$$,\1,p'
> [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff
What's this for?
+JOBS= sysctl -n kern.smp.cpus
Should be != if it's gonna be used, but it's not referenced anywhere else
that I can see.
--
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Unable to build: graphics/libGLU
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > There is a checksum problem with the graphics/libGLU port. Even using > the "NO_CHECKSUM=yes" flag does not help. I then receive an error that > the libGLU-7.4.2.1" file is corrupt. You were likely fetching from garr.dl.sourceforge.net which has suddenly started serving up corrupt files. It has been removed from the list until the problem is resolved so update your ports tree and try again. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Find An Online Nursing/Healthcare School.
You are receiving this message because you= submitted the email address po...@freebsd.org to receive information from http://www.directscholar.com on Jun 09 2009 07:25AM. [1]Go here to add us to your address boo= k [2]Train for a rewarding career in healthcare or nurs= ing. See four top online schools. [3]View in Browser | [4]Unsu= bscribe" style="color:#66">Remove my Email 3D"COLLEGE.US [5][portal=] [6]3D"Degrees [7][portals=] [8]Dear John, Want to prepare for a rewarding career in healthcare or n= ursing? You're in luck. Now more than ever, top schools are offering their career= -focused healthcare and nursing degree programs in a convenient online form at. Find a healthcar= e or nursing degree program now. Careers in the healthcare and nursing fields are in high = demand, with many top schools offering online programs in: [9]o Health Administration [10]o Medical Transcription [11]o Healthcare Management [12]o Nursing [13]o Medical Assisting [14]o And More!* [15] Remember, whether you want to prepare for a new career, or advance your cu= rrent position, an online degree can be your key to getting there. Take the next step toward a more rewarding career today! Find a degree program that works = for you! [16]3D"Train [17][nursi=] [18][i=] [19][portals=] [20]GO NOW! [21][portals=] [22][portal=] [23][portal=] This email= was sent by: COLLEGE.US.COM 2711 N. Sepulveda Blvd. # 148, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 You have subscribed to receive information from us with po...@freebsd.org This email was sent to you because you requested we send you periodical information about schools and colleges. To stop receiving email from COLLEGE.US.COM, [24]Remove me or= write us at the address listed above Please view our [25]Privacy Policy *Program availability varies by = school [ohnmcnjpj_vpvzgfkgvcv.gif&o=] References 1. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/mylfzlkvn_vpvzgfkgvcv_fwvdr 2. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/bncrlcvkh_ 3. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/njznlzqrn_ 4. file://localhost/tmp/3D"h 5. 3D"http://www.news.co=/ 6. 3D"http://www.news.co=/ 7. 3D"http://www.news.col=/ 8. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/yhdpzdfjz_ 9. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/rqlgklnlm 10. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/lrkzykfkk 11. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/ueqpgqdqj 12. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/bncrlcvch 13. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/gbpthpzpt 14. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/xdbrfbmbk 15. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/hgspfsdsj_ 16. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/b 17. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/fw 18. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/aqvjzvqvz_ 19. 3D"http://www.news.col=/ 20. 3D"http://=/ 21. 3D"http://www.news.col=/ 22. 3D"http://www.news.co=/ 23. 3D"http://www.news.co=/ 24. 3D"http://www.news=/ 25. 3D"http://www.news.college.us.com/bncrlcvgz freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: skype-out calls disconnect after 5 minute
on 10/06/2009 19:01 Franci Nabalanci said the following: > Thank you very much for the aswer but I have 7.2 release and I don't > want change to 7 stable. It is not useful anymore. I will try if Ekiga > works better. BTW, if I understand the problem correctly kern.hz="100" in loader.conf should work around the problem. Unless you have to have a different HZ value for something else. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> >> > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the > >> >> > python > >> >> > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone > >> >> > speaks > >> >> > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. > >> >> > > >> >> > Once applied you should be able to use: > >> >> > > >> >> > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages > >> >> > -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> >> > > >> >> > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) > >> >> > so > >> >> > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine > >> >> > and > >> >> > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine > >> >> > with over 1000 ports installed. > >> >> > > >> >> > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > >> >> > > >> >> I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > >> >> > >> >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> >> > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") > >> >> > *** Error code 2 > >> >> > > >> >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > >> > > >> > Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. > >> > > >> > -- WXS > >> > > >> > >> Still not :-( : > >> > >> > # patch >> > Hmm... ?Looks like a unified diff to me... > >> > The text leading up to this was: > >> > -- > >> > |Index: Makefile > >> > |=== > >> > |RCS file: /ncvs/ports/lang/python/Makefile,v > >> > |retrieving revision 1.161 > >> > |diff -u -r1.161 Makefile > >> > |--- Makefile ? 31 Jul 2007 16:28:32 - ? ? ?1.161 > >> > |+++ Makefile ? 10 Jun 2009 15:15:23 - > >> > -- > >> > Patching file Makefile using Plan A... > >> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > >> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. > >> > done > >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> > > >> > ===>>> /var/db/pkg/-f does not exist > >> > ===>>> Aborting update > >> > > >> > *** Signal 15 > >> > > >> > Terminated > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > >> > # > >> > >> portmaster-2.7, python-2.6,2 and python26-2.6.2 are installed. > >> This is on 7.2-RELEASE/i386 with portsnap tree as of "now". > > > > The patch was only tested with PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined. In the > > case where it wasn't defined you would run into the issue you described. > > I think I've fixed it now, so please revert and try again. Sorry for the > > problems, but like I said earlier this is to get it more exposure. > > > > Please revert, fetch the patch again and apply. > > > It now also works fine without PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined, i.e. just > # ( cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER ) Thank you. I'll wait till tomorrow morning (about 24 hours from when I started this thread) before I commit. If anyone has any more feedback, positive or negative please let me know. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: garr sourceforge mirror is broken [Was: Re: Checksum mismatch]
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: > > => Attempting to fetch from > > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. > > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps > > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. I've commented the mirror out for now. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
garr sourceforge mirror is broken [Was: Re: Checksum mismatch]
* Hans Petter Selasky (hsela...@c2i.net) wrote: > ===> Installing for transfig-3.2.5 > ===> transfig-3.2.5 depends on executable: ppmtogif - not found > ===>Verifying install for ppmtogif in /usr/ports/graphics/netpbm > ===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway > => netpbm-10.26.62.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. Seems like garr sourceforge mirror is broken. libGLU% make fetch-urlall-list | while read url; do echo $url; wget -q $url -O- | md5; done http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 2cec5b1ed86a6b62cacb310dcc39de61 http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mesa3d/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/pub/unix/X11/graphics/Mesa/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/MesaLib-7.4.2.tar.bz2 b10a76e32bde4645cfc34ea0416d7d8b Maybe we should move it to the end of mirror list in bsd.sites.mk ASAP? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: skype-out calls disconnect after 5 minute
Thank you very much for the aswer but I have 7.2 release and I don't want change to 7 stable. It is not useful anymore. I will try if Ekiga works better. On 6/10/09, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/06/2009 20:17 ajtiM said the following: >> My system: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 08:49:13 UTC 2009 >> r...@walker.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >> >> Skype-out calls disconnect after about 5 minutes. I red that was problem >> with >> beta or pre release but looks like that is the problem here still. Version >> of >> Skype is 2.9.9.72. >> Do I need to put kern.hz=100 in loader.conf, please? >> >> Thanks in advace, > > I am not entirely sure but I think that the behavior that you see was caused > by > r190893 (on Apr 10) and was fixed by r192987 (on May 28). > I think that your best bet is to upgrade to stable/7 that includes the > aforementioned commit. > > I have been experiencing the same problem myself and tracked it to > linux_times, > but very fortunately Dmitry committed the proper fix before I could finish > my > investigation. > > I think that this may be a good candidate for 7.2 errata. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : >> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: >> >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : >> >> > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the >> >> > python >> >> > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks >> >> > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. >> >> > >> >> > Once applied you should be able to use: >> >> > >> >> > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> >> > >> >> > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so >> >> > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and >> >> > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine >> >> > with over 1000 ports installed. >> >> > >> >> > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff >> >> > >> >> I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: >> >> >> >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> >> > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") >> >> > *** Error code 2 >> >> > >> >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. >> > >> > Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. >> > >> > -- WXS >> > >> >> Still not :-( : >> >> > # patch > > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... >> > The text leading up to this was: >> > -- >> > |Index: Makefile >> > |=== >> > |RCS file: /ncvs/ports/lang/python/Makefile,v >> > |retrieving revision 1.161 >> > |diff -u -r1.161 Makefile >> > |--- Makefile 31 Jul 2007 16:28:32 - 1.161 >> > |+++ Makefile 10 Jun 2009 15:15:23 - >> > -- >> > Patching file Makefile using Plan A... >> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. >> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. >> > done >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> > >> > ===>>> /var/db/pkg/-f does not exist >> > ===>>> Aborting update >> > >> > *** Signal 15 >> > >> > Terminated >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. >> > # >> >> portmaster-2.7, python-2.6,2 and python26-2.6.2 are installed. >> This is on 7.2-RELEASE/i386 with portsnap tree as of "now". > > The patch was only tested with PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined. In the > case where it wasn't defined you would run into the issue you described. > I think I've fixed it now, so please revert and try again. Sorry for the > problems, but like I said earlier this is to get it more exposure. > > Please revert, fetch the patch again and apply. > It now also works fine without PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined, i.e. just # ( cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER ) Thanks, René -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
2009/6/10 Jerry : > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:44:41 +0200 > Rene Ladan wrote: > >>2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : >>> Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the >>> python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless >>> someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the >>> UPDATING entry. >>> >>> Once applied you should be able to use: >>> >>> cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages >>> -DUSE_PORTMASTER >>> >>> It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal >>> method) so be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly >>> used machine and I know at least one other person has survived an >>> upgrade of a machine with over 1000 ports installed. >>> >>> [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff >>> >>I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: >> >>> # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >>> Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") >>> *** Error code 2 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. >> >>Regards, >>René > > IMHO, it seems like there is a lot of energy being spent on this rather > trivial problem. Why not just use the 'portupgrade' solution and be > done with it. This is not like it happens everyday. After all, it is > only one port. Installing portupgrade just for this sounds like an overhead too, plus it needs to build all kinds of databases for only this occasion. It is not part of the base system either (neither is portmaster), and I think both are widely used. René -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:29:45AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:44:41 +0200 > Rene Ladan wrote: > > >2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the > >> python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless > >> someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the > >> UPDATING entry. > >> > >> Once applied you should be able to use: > >> > >> cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages > >> -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> > >> It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal > >> method) so be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly > >> used machine and I know at least one other person has survived an > >> upgrade of a machine with over 1000 ports installed. > >> > >> [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > >> > >I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > > > >> # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") > >> *** Error code 2 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > > > >Regards, > >Ren?? > > IMHO, it seems like there is a lot of energy being spent on this rather > trivial problem. Why not just use the 'portupgrade' solution and be > done with it. This is not like it happens everyday. After all, it is > only one port. It's not hurting anyone and helps those of us who would normally have to install portupgrade and it's dependencies just for this, then remove them when we are done. It's either that or we do the upgrade manually. I'm all for having more than one tool to do the job, and I'd like to see my tool of choice work and not have to use something else for this one case, no matter how infrequent it is. And once it's working we won't have to go through this again. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python > >> > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks > >> > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. > >> > > >> > Once applied you should be able to use: > >> > > >> > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> > > >> > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so > >> > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and > >> > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine > >> > with over 1000 ports installed. > >> > > >> > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > >> > > >> I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > >> > >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > >> > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") > >> > *** Error code 2 > >> > > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > > > > Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. > > > > -- WXS > > > > Still not :-( : > > > # patch > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -- > > |Index: Makefile > > |=== > > |RCS file: /ncvs/ports/lang/python/Makefile,v > > |retrieving revision 1.161 > > |diff -u -r1.161 Makefile > > |--- Makefile 31 Jul 2007 16:28:32 - 1.161 > > |+++ Makefile 10 Jun 2009 15:15:23 - > > -- > > Patching file Makefile using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. > > done > > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > > > ===>>> /var/db/pkg/-f does not exist > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > *** Signal 15 > > > > Terminated > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > > # > > portmaster-2.7, python-2.6,2 and python26-2.6.2 are installed. > This is on 7.2-RELEASE/i386 with portsnap tree as of "now". The patch was only tested with PORTUPGRADE_ARGS defined. In the case where it wasn't defined you would run into the issue you described. I think I've fixed it now, so please revert and try again. Sorry for the problems, but like I said earlier this is to get it more exposure. Please revert, fetch the patch again and apply. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:44:41 +0200 Rene Ladan wrote: >2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : >> Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the >> python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless >> someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the >> UPDATING entry. >> >> Once applied you should be able to use: >> >> cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages >> -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> >> It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal >> method) so be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly >> used machine and I know at least one other person has survived an >> upgrade of a machine with over 1000 ports installed. >> >> [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff >> >I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > >> # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > >Regards, >René IMHO, it seems like there is a lot of energy being spent on this rather trivial problem. Why not just use the 'portupgrade' solution and be done with it. This is not like it happens everyday. After all, it is only one port. Just my 2¢. -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com Different all twisty a of in maze are you, passages little. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : >> > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python >> > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks >> > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. >> > >> > Once applied you should be able to use: >> > >> > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> > >> > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so >> > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and >> > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine >> > with over 1000 ports installed. >> > >> > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff >> > >> I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: >> >> > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER >> > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") >> > *** Error code 2 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > > Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. > > -- WXS > Still not :-( : > # patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |Index: Makefile > |=== > |RCS file: /ncvs/ports/lang/python/Makefile,v > |retrieving revision 1.161 > |diff -u -r1.161 Makefile > |--- Makefile 31 Jul 2007 16:28:32 - 1.161 > |+++ Makefile 10 Jun 2009 15:15:23 - > -- > Patching file Makefile using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. > done > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > ===>>> /var/db/pkg/-f does not exist > ===>>> Aborting update > > *** Signal 15 > > Terminated > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. > # portmaster-2.7, python-2.6,2 and python26-2.6.2 are installed. This is on 7.2-RELEASE/i386 with portsnap tree as of "now". René -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Unable to build: graphics/libGLU
There is a checksum problem with the graphics/libGLU port. Even using the "NO_CHECKSUM=yes" flag does not help. I then receive an error that the libGLU-7.4.2.1" file is corrupt. -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com The three questions of greatest concern are: 1. Is it attractive? 2. Is it amusing? 3. Does it know its place? Fran Lebowitz, "Metropolitan Life" signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python > > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks > > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. > > > > Once applied you should be able to use: > > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > > > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so > > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and > > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine > > with over 1000 ports installed. > > > > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > > > I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > > > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. Sorry, updated the patch to address this. Please revert and try again. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster
2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks > up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. > > Once applied you should be able to use: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so > be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and > I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine > with over 1000 ports installed. > > [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff > I applied the patch, but there is something wrong: > # make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}") > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. Regards, René -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: skype-out calls disconnect after 5 minute
on 07/06/2009 20:17 ajtiM said the following: > My system: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 08:49:13 UTC 2009 > r...@walker.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > Skype-out calls disconnect after about 5 minutes. I red that was problem with > beta or pre release but looks like that is the problem here still. Version of > Skype is 2.9.9.72. > Do I need to put kern.hz=100 in loader.conf, please? > > Thanks in advace, I am not entirely sure but I think that the behavior that you see was caused by r190893 (on Apr 10) and was fixed by r192987 (on May 28). I think that your best bet is to upgrade to stable/7 that includes the aforementioned commit. I have been experiencing the same problem myself and tracked it to linux_times, but very fortunately Dmitry committed the proper fix before I could finish my investigation. I think that this may be a good candidate for 7.2 errata. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Checksum mismatch
===> Installing for transfig-3.2.5 ===> transfig-3.2.5 depends on executable: ppmtogif - not found ===>Verifying install for ppmtogif in /usr/ports/graphics/netpbm ===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway => netpbm-10.26.62.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/. netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netpbm-10.26.62.tgz. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Python 2.6 update with portmaster
Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. Once applied you should be able to use: cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER It will be quite slow compared to using pkg_which (the normal method) so be patient. I've used this patch to upgrade one lightly used machine and I know at least one other person has survived an upgrade of a machine with over 1000 ports installed. [1]: http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/python26-portmaster.diff -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: gnome-screensaver wirdness
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Iv?n Zaera Avell?n wrote: IZA> I sent this mail to Dmitry yesterday but got no confirmation from him, IZA> so I'm sending it again to the list. I have googled a bit and some IZA> Linux distro have also this problem (at least Kubuntu, Debian and IZA> OpenSUSE that I know). IZA> IZA> Can anybody experiencing the problem try to change the screensaver to IZA> a non-OpenGL and try again. Also I remember that, although the lock IZA> dialog didn't appear, I could type my password and unlock the screen. Well, for me it does not: my screensaver is "blank screen" -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: gnome-screensaver wirdness
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> JMC> > > on a couple of my workstations, after portupgrading, I've found that DM> JMC> > > gnome-screensaver after activating renders X unusable, as it shows desktop with DM> JMC> > > password dialog box for fraction of second, then blanks it back. Killing DM> JMC> > > gnome-xscreensaver from other console helps, but it does not seem for me to be DM> JMC> > > a solution. DM> JMC> > > DM> JMC> > > previously, I found it would be glitches with hald/dbus, and step-by-step DM> JMC> > > shutdown of these services and then starting them helped, but now it's not the DM> JMC> > > case: even reboot does not fix this. DM> JMC> > > DM> JMC> > > Any hints? Thanks! DM> JMC> > DM> JMC> > I see this periodically when doing port updates. I think that it has to DM> JMC> > do with re-installing either gnome-screensaver or consolekit. A reboot DM> JMC> > has always solved it for me. DM> JMC> DM> JMC> Actually, it's gdm. Every time gdm gets updated, you need to logout of DM> JMC> GNOME, restart gdm, then log back in. DM> DM> Well, this scheme helped all the times before, but now it at least seems it DM> does not. I'll try to test it again after returning home and report back the DM> results. Well, for two contemporary RELENG_7/i386 machines I confirm than ewen after portupgrade -f gdm gnome-screensaver consolekit and subsequent reboot, activating screensaver leads to the effect described earlier. Both machines use VESA X driver, if it's important. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
__lxstat/gzopen undefined symbol while loading a shared library
Hi all, I am considerably new to FreeBsd, previously working on Linux but have no idea of FreeBsd, below are steps what I am doing and getting error: a) I have ported a shared library written for linux to FreeBsd 7.0 Release. b) This ported library (say lib.so) is compiled successfully on my FreeBsd 7.0 machine. c) Now I am getting the following error while trying to load lib.so using dlopen(lib.so, RTLD_LAZY) from another program: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/lib.so: undefined symbol “__lxstat” I Googled and found that __lxstat is a linux symbol and should be there in linux-ports, but updating the linux-ports package also doesn’t resolved this issue. d) If I use RTLD_NOW I did not get the “__lxstat not defined” error, but then another error comes from libpci.so.3.1.2, dlerror=/usr/ligb/lib.so: Undefined symbol “gzopen”. I am using some functions from libpci.so.3.1.2 in my library and linking the libpci.so.3.1.2 normaly using –lpci In libpci.so.3.1.2 the –lz option links the libz to libpci so there should not be any issue in it. Following are some logs output: $objdump -T /usr/lib/lib.so | grep __lxstat D *UND* __lxstat $objdump -T /usr/lib/lib.so | grep gzopen D *UND* gzopen $objdump -T /usr/lib/libpci.so.3.1.2 | grep gzopen DF *UND*0014 gzopen $objdump -T /usr/lib/libz.so | grep gzopen 4500 gDF .text0014 Basegzopen Can anybody please help!! Regards Bharat _ Missed any of the IPL matches ? Catch a recap of all the action on MSN Videos http://msnvideos.in/iplt20/msnvideoplayer.aspx___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Fwd: gnome-screensaver wirdness
Hi all: I sent this mail to Dmitry yesterday but got no confirmation from him, so I'm sending it again to the list. I have googled a bit and some Linux distro have also this problem (at least Kubuntu, Debian and OpenSUSE that I know). Can anybody experiencing the problem try to change the screensaver to a non-OpenGL and try again. Also I remember that, although the lock dialog didn't appear, I could type my password and unlock the screen. If you confirm this error I'm afraid the problem is in the original code for X11 or OpenGL or the screensavers, in which case it wouldn't be a FreeBSD only problem and would have to be corrected in the upstream code. Regards, Ivan -- Forwarded message -- From: Iván Zaera Avellón Date: Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM Subject: Re: gnome-screensaver wirdness To: Dmitry Morozovsky Hi Dmitry: I'm new to FreeBSD so I don't know the internals of the system, but I'm changing from Debian/Linux and had the same problem some months ago (to add more differences to your case, I had KDE instead of GNOME). In my case it was an interaction between OpenGL, transparency in the video driver, the screensaver and the desktop lock program. The bypass solution I found was to stop using OpenGL screensaver (apart from killing the screen saver or the desktop lock programs from a text console, as you say). I don't know if this can help you because, as I said, my configuration was totally different from yours, but I just wanted to share my solution because the problems looked similar. Hope it helps, Ivan Zaera ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Port of "service" command
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:30:44PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Kevin Downey wrote:
>> I have a similar shell function I am rather fond of:
>>
>> rc(){
>> find /etc/rc.d/"$1" /usr/local/etc/rc.d/"$1" -exec sudo {} `echo
>> "$*"|cut -f 2- -d \ ` \;
>> }
>
> Wow, that's painful. :) The only reason you don't notice how painful
> is because those two directories have only a few files. Much much more
> efficient would be something like:
>
> rc () {
> local script=$1
> shift
>
> if [ -x "/etc/rc.d/$script" ]; then
> /etc/rc.d/$script $*
> elif [ -x "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/$script" ]; then
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/$script $*
> else
> echo "$script does not exist in /etc/rc.d or"
> echo "/usr/local/etc/rc.d"
> return 1
> fi
> }
#!/bin/sh
name=$1
cmd=$2
if [ -z "${name}" -o -z "${cmd}" ]; then
echo ${0##*/} service_name command
exit 3
fi
. /etc/rc.subr
load_rc_config ${name}
for dir in /etc/rc.d ${local_startup}; do
if [ -r "${dir}/${name}" ]; then
run_rc_script "${dir}/${name}" ${cmd}
exit 0
fi
if [ -r "${dir}/${name}.sh" ]; then
run_rc_script "${dir}/${name}.sh" ${cmd}
exit 0
fi
done
echo "service '${name}' not found"
exit 2
Most useful with shell completion.
--
Adios
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
