Review requested -- new trac plugin port

2016-01-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
Dear all,

Before hitting the commit button on this, I thought I'd check that what
I'm doing here is OK.  So far I've got three new trac plugin modules I'd
like to port. They're all pretty similar, and I've based my work on some
existing trac plugin ports (mostly www/trac-discussion).  However it
doesn't really feel right to me.

I've created a review for the first of these --
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4796

The others are essentially the same pattern, but they aren't anything
near finished quality yet...

The problem I have with this is not having some downloadable tarball to
work with.  Instead, I'm checking sources out of the trac-hacks SVN and
rolling my own .tar.gz which I then place into MASTER_SITES=LOCAL/matthew

 Is this OK?

Cheers,

Matthew



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


portupgrade fails possibly due to py27-asn1 rename to py-pyasn1

2016-01-05 Thread Graham Menhennitt
Hi all,

I updated my ports collection the other day and ran portupgrade. It
fails on the devel/py-pyasn1 port with the error:

===>  Installing for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9
===>   py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found
===>   py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found
===>  Checking if py27-pyasn1 already installed
===>   Registering installation for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 as automatic
Installing py27-pyasn1-0.1.9...
pkg-static: py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 conflicts with py27-asn1-0.1.8,1 (installs
files into the same place).  Problematic file:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyasn1/__init__.py
*** Error code 70

Stop.

I suspect it's because this port was recently renamed from
devel/py27-asn1 (see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204567). I can't see
any message in UPDATING that's relevant.

Any clues please?

Thanks,
Graham
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: portupgrade fails possibly due to py27-asn1 rename to py-pyasn1

2016-01-05 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 5/01/2016 10:52 PM, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I updated my ports collection the other day and ran portupgrade. It
> fails on the devel/py-pyasn1 port with the error:
> 
> ===>  Installing for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9
> ===>   py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found
> ===>   py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found
> ===>  Checking if py27-pyasn1 already installed
> ===>   Registering installation for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 as automatic
> Installing py27-pyasn1-0.1.9...
> pkg-static: py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 conflicts with py27-asn1-0.1.8,1 (installs
> files into the same place).  Problematic file:
> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyasn1/__init__.py
> *** Error code 70
> 
> Stop.
> 
> I suspect it's because this port was recently renamed from
> devel/py27-asn1 (see
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204567). I can't see
> any message in UPDATING that's relevant.
> 
> Any clues please?
> 
> Thanks,
> Graham

Had their been an UPDATING entry, it would have said please delete
py-asn, then reinstall py-pyasn.

At least portmaster users would have been affected by a move like this I
believe, not sure about portupgrade. I was under the impression it
handled moves OK.

CC'ing committer.

Thanks for letting us know Graham
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Using GitLab With Port Makefile

2016-01-05 Thread Shawn Webb
Hey freebsd-ports peeps,

I'm writing a custom ports entry for my employer. We have an internal
GitLab instance. I was wondering if it'd be possible to use USE_GITHUB
with our internal GitLab, but instead of having the Ports system use
GitHub to download the archive, use our GitLab instance. Is that
possible?

I see in ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk that MASTER_SITE_GITHUB is appended to.
But it looks like I can't override that.

Let me know how best to proceed. Admittedly, I'm a newb at creating
ports entries.

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
HardenedBSD

GPG Key ID:  0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


FreeBSD Port: subversion-1.9.3_1 cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.26_3

2016-01-05 Thread Joseph Bruni
Hello,

I recently struggled with getting subversion with SASL to work with LDAP 
authentication on freebsd 10.2. Both subversion (1.9.3) and SASL (2.1.26) were 
install from ports.

For the most part configuration followed the documentation, but there was one 
hitch. I'm not sure if this is something that should be handled as part of the 
subversion port or as part of the SASL port.

When subversion is installed, the default rc scripts run svnserve with a 
user/group of svn/svn. However, when SASL-authd is installed, it uses a domain 
socket path of /var/run/saslauthd with ownership of cyrus/mail. This directory 
is not readable by the svn user.

To make this work, I either had to add the svn user to the "mail" group, or 
relax the permisson on /var/run/saslauthd so that svnserve would be able to 
open the socket to the saslauthd. Perhaps the permissions to the socket were 
too restrictive by default.

Regards,
Joseph



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-01-05 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
net/appkonference   | 2.1 | 2.7
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"