Re: portsnap depreciation
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:44:27 -0700, John Kennedy stated: >On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >> >> See >> >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree >> >> and the next sections. >> > >> > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to >> > have Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either >> > portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if >> > running FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running >> > 11.4-RELEASE, I cannot use subversion? >> >> "The most straightforward", not "the only". You can definitely use >> Subversion with 11.4 if you wish or need to. What you no longer can >> do is use portsnap with -CURRENT. (I'll grant that "straightforward" >> may be in the eye of the beholder, though.) > >For my stuff, I pull my stuff into /usr/ports however I want (git, >long before it was fashionable in my case) and then just set up >poudriere to use that. I do a similar things with /usr/src, except I >want poudriere to have a static copy of that, just in case. > >[initial creation] > poudriere jail -c -j 12-2 -v 12.2 -m src=/usr/src > poudriere ports -c -m null -M /usr/ports -p master > > poudriere jail -l > > JAILNAME VERSIONARCH METHOD > TIMESTAMP PATH 12-2 12.2-BETA2 1202000 amd64 > src=/usr/src 2020-09-18 15:32:59 > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/12-2 > > The "-m null" (null method) lets you manage it however you want. > > If I look at my mounts during the build, with ZFS, I can see them: > > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted > on ... > /usr/ports 350G4.0G346G 1% > /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/12-2-master/ref/usr/ports > /usr/ports/distfiles364G 17G346G 5% > /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/12-2-master/ref/distfiles Thanks John, but that is definitely more complex than my needs require. -- Carmel pgpCC3Q_t_gta.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: portsnap depreciation
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote: > On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: > >> See > >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > >> and the next sections. > > > > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have > > Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either > > portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running > > FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, > > I cannot use subversion? > > "The most straightforward", not "the only". You can definitely use > Subversion with 11.4 if you wish or need to. What you no longer can do > is use portsnap with -CURRENT. (I'll grant that "straightforward" may be > in the eye of the beholder, though.) For my stuff, I pull my stuff into /usr/ports however I want (git, long before it was fashionable in my case) and then just set up poudriere to use that. I do a similar things with /usr/src, except I want poudriere to have a static copy of that, just in case. [initial creation] poudriere jail -c -j 12-2 -v 12.2 -m src=/usr/src poudriere ports -c -m null -M /usr/ports -p master poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSIONARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH 12-2 12.2-BETA2 1202000 amd64 src=/usr/src 2020-09-18 15:32:59 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/12-2 The "-m null" (null method) lets you manage it however you want. If I look at my mounts during the build, with ZFS, I can see them: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on ... /usr/ports 350G4.0G346G 1% /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/12-2-master/ref/usr/ports /usr/ports/distfiles364G 17G346G 5% /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/12-2-master/ref/distfiles ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portsnap depreciation
On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree and the next sections. According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, I cannot use subversion? "The most straightforward", not "the only". You can definitely use Subversion with 11.4 if you wish or need to. What you no longer can do is use portsnap with -CURRENT. (I'll grant that "straightforward" may be in the eye of the beholder, though.) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portsnap depreciation
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: > >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Is 'portsnap' > >> going to be depreciated? > > > >Yes. > > > >> If so, when? > > > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent > >-current. > > > >> If is is depreciated, how will > >> this affect poudriere? > > > >See > >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > > > >and the next sections. > > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have > Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either > portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running > FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, > I cannot use subversion? > You can if you specify the -m (method) parameter when creating the poudriere ports tree. René ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portsnap depreciation
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote: > ... > >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > > > >and the next sections. > > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have > Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either > portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running > FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, > I cannot use subversion? > I don't see any reason why you cannot use subversion: I do, and have done, since 05 July 2015, running stable/10 at the time; now running stable/12. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org "President Trump can say whatever he likes, but his actions speak for themselves." -- Dan Berschinski, wounded US Army veteran See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: portsnap depreciation
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: >> Is 'portsnap' >> going to be depreciated? > >Yes. > >> If so, when? > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent >-current. > >> If is is depreciated, how will >> this affect poudriere? > >See >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > >and the next sections. According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE, I cannot use subversion? -- Carmel pgpco7s6kGJJ9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: portsnap depreciation
On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: Is 'portsnap' going to be depreciated? Yes. If so, when? I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent -current. If is is depreciated, how will this affect poudriere? See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree and the next sections. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
portsnap depreciation
Perhaps I am wrong on this, so I thought I would ask. Is 'portsnap' going to be depreciated? If so, when? If is is depreciated, how will this affect poudriere? I thought that poudriere used 'portsnap'. -- Carmel pgpu4e_OrLlmR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ science/afni| 20.2.16 | afni_20.2.18 +-+ sysutils/hfsexplorer| 0.23.1 | hfsexplorer-2020.9.17 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
