mail/phpmailer abandoned?
Is the ports maintainer in charge of mail/phpmailer no longer updating it? I've sent 2 emails a couple months ago and heard nothing back. Also, I submitted a bug report stating an update is needed - and that is now collecting dust. PHPMailer 5.2.26 was released on November 4th. Also, the new v6.0.2 was released on November 30th. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223828 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Qupzilla 2.x
We already have a port of QupZilla 2.1.2 on TrueOS[1] which works perfectly fine (been using it every day for several weeks). Feel free to copy/use that when updating the port in the FreeBSD tree: [1] https://github.com/trueos/freebsd-ports/tree/trueos-master/www/qupzilla-qt5 On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:47:29 PM EDT, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: Hi all, Now that we have qt5-webengine (as of https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=448132 <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=448132>), I wondered if anyone is working on porting qupzilla 2.x? -- ~~ Ken Moore ~~ TrueOS/iXsystems ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Marketing Automation
Hi, Would you be interested in an email lead list of different Sales and Marketing Automation software users? Would it help to acquire business information along with contact details of key profiles and decision makers? Users Includes: > Salesforce Users > Marketo Users > ExactTarget Users > Eloqua Users > Silverpop Users Title includes: > CMO > VP/Director Marketing > VP/Director Sales > Marketing Manager The list comes with complete contact information like Contact name, Email address, Title, Company name, Phone number, Mailing address, etc. I'd be happy to send over few sample records on your request, and set up a time to discuss in detail. If there is someone else in your organization that I need to speak with, I'd be grateful if you would forward this email to the appropriate contact and help me with the introduction. Have a great day! Regards, ] Ken Harvey / INF Solutions / 302-250-4336 If you don't wish to receive emails from us reply back with "Unsubscribe". ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6
Hey guys, It's been a week since PHP 5.6.25 was released and it still has not hit the ports system. This has been an ongoing problem for quite sometime now. According to freshports commit log, the maintainer for PHP 5.6 hasn't made a commit since November 2015. What exactly is the status of maintainership for this port? Is it time for the maintainership to be reset or changed? Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: apache24-2.4.20
Is it possible to update/patch Apache24 with the latest backport? As it stands now, mod_status is completely useless without this patch. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1739008 Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: postfixadmin-2.3.7_1
I noticed the posts system still points to v2.3.7 .. however, the latest postfixadmin v2.92 was released October 28, 2014 (9 months ago). Is there any reason why this port has not been updated to reflect the latest version? Thanks, Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
install issue with net-snmp
I am having a problem installing net-snmp. It seems it can't find the work files to install. root@mccoy:/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # make install ===> Installing for net-snmp-5.7.3_5 ===> net-snmp-5.7.3_5 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.2 - found ===> Checking if net-snmp already installed /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.2 ===> Registering installation for net-snmp-5.7.3_5 pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.16/Bundle/Makefile.subs.pl: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.16/NetSNMP/ASN.pm: No such file or directory ... much of the same cut out. I tried compiling with and without embedded perl and I get the error. I finally edit the Plist with %s/%%WITH_PERLSITE_ARCH%%/\/usr\/local\/lib\/perl5\/site_perl\/5.16.2\/mach/. This changed the site from mach/5.16 to 5.16.2/mach and the install completed! Is this a bug or is something wrong with my perl install. Shouldn't my older perl installation still work? Thanks for any advice. Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: nginx-1.4.7_1,2
Nginx 1.6.0 has was released on April 24th (and is the new “stable” version). Lots of bug fixes and new features in this update. http://nginx.org/en/download.html When might we see an update in the ports tree for this new version? Thanks, Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: phpMyAdmin-4.1.14
The latest couple phpMyAdmin updates has had some major update dependency issues. Now, phpMyAdmin errors out and doesn’t install. It’s not checking the correct directory to see if PHP is already installed – then errors out at the end of the compile. Here is the log : ==> phpMyAdmin-4.1.14 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> phpMyAdmin-4.1.14 depends on file: /usr/local//libphp5.so - not found ===>Verifying install for /usr/local//libphp5.so in /usr/ports/lang/php53 *** PHP Installation Process *** Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/usr/ports/lang/php53/work/pkg/php53-5.3.28_1.tbz' ===> Installing for php53-5.3.28_1 ===> Checking if lang/php53 already installed ===> php53-5.3.28_1 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of lang/php53 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php53. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php53. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20140427-80640-68q4mg env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=phpMyAdmin-4.1.13 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.1.13 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! databases/phpmyadmin (phpMyAdmin-4.1.13) (new compiler error) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg_replace and detecting pkg(ng)
Hello,
I made a patch for your request.
Please see, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187723
Thank you.
> Hi,
>
> In the past I've been able to use pkg_replace on machine that didn't
> have the ports collection installed.
>
> With the current version of pkg_replace this doesn't seem to be
> possible anymore, since pkg(ng) detection breaks in those cases:
>
> : ${use_pkgng="`/usr/bin/make -f/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V
> WITH_PKGNG`"}
> if [ "x${use_pkgng}" = "xdevel" ]; then
> use_pkgng="yes"
> fi
>
> bsd.port.mk requires /usr/ports/Mk/...
>
> One of the main motivations to use pkg_replace for me is to not having
> a ports tree on the machines I use it on.
>
> I would suggest to replace this with a detection mechanism similar to
> what ports does:
>
> If sysctl -n kern.osreldate >= 117
> use_pkgng=yes, unless WITHOUT_PKGNG is defined
> else if defined(WITH_PKGNG) (any value, not just ==yes)
> use_pkgng=yes
> else
> use_pkgng=no
>
> Determining WITH_PKGNG/WITHOUT_PKGNG should be done using make -V VAR
> (without specifying a Makefile, so /etc/make.conf is read).
>
> - Michael
>
> --
> Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PKGNG: ability to view pkg-plist?
On 10/25/2013 18:05, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 25/10/2013 18:24, Ken Moore wrote:
I have been looking around, but I am unable to find a way to easily read
the pkg-plist within a PKGNG package on the repository. Is this
functionality missing in pkg, or am I just missing something?
If you've downloaded the package tarball, then like this:
lucid-nonsense:...cache/pkg/All:% pkg info -l -F ./pkg-1.1.4_8.txz
pkg-1.1.4_8:
/usr/local/share/licenses/pkg-1.1.4_8/catalog.mk
/usr/local/share/licenses/pkg-1.1.4_8/LICENSE
/usr/local/share/licenses/pkg-1.1.4_8/BSD
/usr/local/etc/pkg.conf.sample
/usr/local/sbin/pkg
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static
/usr/local/sbin/pkg2ng
/usr/local/include/pkg.h
/usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.1
/usr/local/lib/libpkg.so
/usr/local/lib/libpkg.a
/usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/400.status-pkg
/usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/411.pkg-backup
/usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes
/usr/local/etc/periodic/security/410.pkg-audit
/usr/local/etc/periodic/security/460.pkg-checksum
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/pkg.pc
/usr/local/man/man3/pkg_printf.3.gz
/usr/local/man/man5/pkg-repository.5.gz
/usr/local/man/man5/pkg.conf.5.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-add.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-annotate.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-audit.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-autoremove.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-backup.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-check.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-clean.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-convert.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-create.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-delete.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-fetch.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-info.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-install.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-lock.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-query.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-register.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-remove.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-repo.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-rquery.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-search.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-set.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-shell.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-shlib.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-static.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-stats.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-unlock.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-update.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-updating.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-upgrade.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-version.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg-which.8.gz
/usr/local/man/man8/pkg.8.gz
/usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions/_pkg
/usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash
Otherwise there is an optional '-l' flag to 'pkg repo' that creates a
database of all of the files installable by all of the packages in the
repo -- which should be downloadable as 'filesite.txz'. Whether this
exists or not depends on the choices of the repository maintainer. It's
not currently available from the official repos for http://pkg.freebsd.org/
Just for a bit of context:
I am working on adding the functionality into EasyPBI to work *without*
a local copy of the ports tree available, so I am trying to grab all the
information about a given package from the remote repository (with user
privileges) to maintain the "Easy" part of EasyPBI in the new version.
Most of the information can be easily pulled using "pkg rquery", but the
only thing I am still missing is the ability to search through the
pkg-plist for binaries/icons/etc..
Yeah -- the repository catalogue is a collection of selected package
metadata for the packages in the repo. Unfortunately the lists of files
and directories from each package aren't part of that selection. Mostly
because of the space they'd take up.
Whether it would be desirable to publish a 'filesite.txz' index of all
the files in the packages on the official repos is a matter for debate.
It would probably mean some changes to poudriere too -- I can't see any
obvious way of telling it to run 'pkg repo -l' instead of plain 'pkg repo'.
Cheers,
Matthew
Thanks for the confirmation. The only way I am seeing that it can be
done at the moment is to download and/or install the package first, and
then there are a couple of pkg command for getting the pkg-plist ("pkg
info -l -F" if not installed, "pkg query %Fp" if it is installed).
Unfortunately, this generally requires root/admin permissions to fetch
the package (unless I change the package cache dir, but I am hesitant to
do that for a simple application like this), so that is out of the
question for my use case.
I will look into the "pkg repo -l" option and see if that will work. If
so, we might be able to
PKGNG: ability to view pkg-plist?
Hey guys, I have been looking around, but I am unable to find a way to easily read the pkg-plist within a PKGNG package on the repository. Is this functionality missing in pkg, or am I just missing something? Just for a bit of context: I am working on adding the functionality into EasyPBI to work *without* a local copy of the ports tree available, so I am trying to grab all the information about a given package from the remote repository (with user privileges) to maintain the "Easy" part of EasyPBI in the new version. Most of the information can be easily pulled using "pkg rquery", but the only thing I am still missing is the ability to search through the pkg-plist for binaries/icons/etc.. Thanks! -- ~~ Ken Moore ~~ PC-BSD/iXsystems ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2
Laurent Grangeau wrote: Hi ! I'm having trouble running portupgrade -ra after upgrading from 6.3 to 7.0 with the freebsd-update util. When I try to run portupgrade, it says : "Fatal error 'Cannot allocate red zone for initial thread' at line 384 in file /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c (errno = 12)" I've got some troubles running freebsd-update, and I have made some change manually, like install ports/misc/compat6x in order to have my old apps running, rename INDEX-6.db to INDEX-6.db.old and reconstruct it. I don't see where the problem comes from and I don't know how to solve it. I have searched on Google and I didn't find anything that can help me. I have no /usr/src sub-directories. Regards, Lauren, It sounds like you have partially updated some ports and you now have a library conflict with two versions of libc. Make sure your ports collections is up to date (using csup ports.sup or you favorite method ) Then, run cd /usr/ports;make fetchindex . Then delete portupgrade using pkg_delete portupgrade\* and cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade; make install. You may also want to reinstall ruby this way before reinstalling portupgrade. After portupgraded is installed rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and portupgrade will rebuild it. Hope this helps you, Ken ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
amd64 version of Opera
Someone (cough Dan cough) noticed me saying on IRC one of the things I
missed after shifting my home machine from i386 to amd64 was Opera. He
pointed me at this:
http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/snapshot-1834/amd64-freebsd/
which it turned out was very simple to install (I needed to build
x11-toolkits/qt33, and just ran the install.sh that was packaged in the
Opera download).
He suggested I send this to see if someone familiar with the Opera ports
would be interested in packaging this up into a real port. That URL is
pretty hard to find. I had tried checking Opera's site with firefox
when I initially got the amd64 machine running but I took their
short-cut to look for an Opera version to download on their homepage
which mistakenly took me to the i386 version for FreeBSD. I didn't dig
any farther than that until Dan gave me the URL above.
Thanks.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
configure: error: Could not find GLIB
checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no creating libtool checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking for glib-2.0... yes checking GLIB_CFLAGS... -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib- 2.0/include checking GLIB_LIBS... -L/usr/local/lib -lglib-2.0 -liconv checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0... no *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly installed. configure: error: Could not find GLIB (see config.log for details). ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/textproc/gdome2/work/gdome2-0.8.1/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls www`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/gdome2. -- - Copy my source in your reply,Please! Wish you a lovely day~ Ken. config.log Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 'b' and 'n' keys don't work after 'xorg' upgrade
Something goes wrong here, too. I upgraded to xorg 7.3 and changed the keyboard layout to Japanese 106. Suddenly, the console displays KATAKANA responding to key input. I am just wanting to change key layout, not character set I am using gnome2 on -current. I have not experienced such thing on 7.2. Any ideas to solve this? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: eclipse 3.3.0
I think that I patched almost all and it is now possible to finish compilation. However, it does not work It complains "The Eclipse executable launcher was unable to locate its companion shared library" when it starts, something still missing? (tar file in result has 1685 files while that of linux fedra has 1680 files.) Based on Dan's tar file I updated and put it to http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-dan.tgz. I hope that guru's in the community support accerelating this to work. Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: eclipse 3.3.0
Is there any progress in porting eclipse 3.3 so far? I am struggling at it without any success yet. And I would like to have any support/help from others - it is somewhat beyond my knowledge Some I noticed are; 1) It requires jdk1.6.0 - jdt compilation fails with jdk1.5.0. 2) file organization has changed somewhat. features/org.eclipse.platform.launchers disappeared. features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable coming up. etc... Although it has quite a problem - can't complete compilation, you'll find http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse33.tgz that I am using for porting for those who have interests in porting eclipse 3.3.0. I hope that gurus in the community accelerate the porting work. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: eclipse 3.3.0
Sorry, please ignore my previous mail. I found the source code Sorry! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: eclipse 3.3.0
Hi! Eclipse.org seemingly do not provide source codes of 3.3/Europe. We may need to extract necessary source code from CVS repository which is different from 3.1/3.2 era. We may need to have different approach/strategy ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
samba-3.0.25 port status
Hello: Anyone know anything about the status of Samba3 port? 3.0.25 has been released for over a week now and port is still at 3.0.24. Is because of xorg semi-freeze or perhaps some issues w/3.0.25? I seem to recall that samba port is usually updated pretty quickly. TIA-- P.S.; Not subscribe so please cc me w/replies. -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson GPG Key -- 9F5179FD "Never hold discussions with the monkey when the organ grinder is in the room." - Sir Winston Churchill ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
Thank you, Florent. I understand that we need to be patient another two days... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
From: "Rene Ladan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can > look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what > goes on. No, "http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg"; says; --Quote-- Disclaimer If you read about the git repository, forget about it and hold your breath a couple days again. Everything should be merged back to the FreeBSD within a few days. --Unqote-- git may be maintained, but the page already does not show any of git pages and information, anymore. That is the reason why I am asking... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far? port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in my cvsup'd port tree... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Module-Build-2802 dependency problem
Interesting - another MakeMaker weirdness I guess?
John: here's a bug report I'm passing along for version.pm, not sure
what the deal is. On my machine I've confirmed that 'perl
Makefile.PL; make;' doesn't produce any man pages in blib/ with
version.pm 0.652.
-Ken
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:51 PM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that now p5-version does not install manpages.
I'd try to make a patch for that. Can you investigate that?
Thanks,
--- Makefile.PL.origWed Jul 19 23:22:09 2006
+++ Makefile.PL Thu Jul 20 10:29:00 2006
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
AUTHOR => 'John Peacock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>') :
()
),
+ MAN3PODS=>
+ {'lib/version.pod' => 'blib/man3/version.3' },
PM =>
{'lib/version.pm' => '$(INST_LIBDIR)/version.pm'},
PL_FILES=> {},
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:20:06PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I
think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build.
-Ken
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
Hi,
Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on
p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem.
i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but
p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too.
Currently I've made patches (copy version-related codes from
0.2801) to solve this problem temporary, can you help me to
permanent avoid this problem?
Regards,
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Module-Build-2802 dependency problem
Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build. -Ken On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: Hi, Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of 'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem. i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too. Currently I've made patches (copy version-related codes from 0.2801) to solve this problem temporary, can you help me to permanent avoid this problem? Regards, -- Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
