Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 20/08/2012 10:16, Denny Lin wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement for teTex. ... Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to have some volunteers in a week. Here we go: http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need help figuring this out. Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just add ports as people report problems? Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in one go before replacing them with portmaster. Maybe I need to add texlive conflicts to teTeX and its ilk. I also want to add a texlive-asymptote port. But only after texlive is out there. I already tested the build, but there are some dependencies I want to add OPTIONS for and that's nothing I want to inflict on the texlive-base. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement for teTex. ... Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to have some volunteers in a week. Here we go: http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need help figuring this out. Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just add ports as people report problems? -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement for teTex. ... Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to have some volunteers in a week. Here we go: http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need help figuring this out. Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just add ports as people report problems? Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in one go before replacing them with portmaster. -- Denny Lin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 20/08/2012 10:16, Denny Lin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
for teTex.
...
Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to
have some volunteers in a week.
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly
just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need
help figuring this out.
Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just
add ports as people report problems?
Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS
you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the
transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in
one go before replacing them with portmaster.
I have run into problems with portmaster. The problem is that it doesn't
check whether a dependency is satisfied. It just goes ahead and installs
them.
I think a dependency like:
latex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base
shouldn't cause portmaster to install teTeX-base. Not if a latex
binary is already available.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 08/20/2012 01:23, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have run into problems with portmaster. The problem is that it doesn't
check whether a dependency is satisfied. It just goes ahead and installs
them.
I think a dependency like:
latex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base
shouldn't cause portmaster to install teTeX-base. Not if a latex
binary is already available.
Portmaster doesn't handle dependencies that way, it relies on the port
authors to register CONFLICTS. If you have installed a port that
installs a latex binary it and teTeX-base should have CONFLICTS
registered against each other.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 20/08/2012 10:40, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/20/2012 01:23, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have run into problems with portmaster. The problem is that it doesn't
check whether a dependency is satisfied. It just goes ahead and installs
them.
I think a dependency like:
latex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base
shouldn't cause portmaster to install teTeX-base. Not if a latex
binary is already available.
Portmaster doesn't handle dependencies that way, it relies on the port
authors to register CONFLICTS. If you have installed a port that
installs a latex binary it and teTeX-base should have CONFLICTS
registered against each other.
So evidently my list of CONFLICTS is not complete.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
Hi,
On 14/08/2012 03:49, Denny Lin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 13/08/2012 04:45, Denny Lin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
Adding this line to print/texlive-base/Makefile should remove the need
to patch graphics/poppler:
CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
I still think this is a proplem of poppler, so it should be fixed
there. However, I agree the way I go about fixing it is not optimal.
So I have updated the patch. Still not satisfactory, but maybe a
little better.
texlinks: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
Something must have gone wrong with texlive-texmf. The file should be
in ${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
I tried searching for fmtutil.cnf:
# find work/texlive-20120701-source/ -name fmtutil.cnf
work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/tetex/fmtutil.cnf
This error occurs even when I patched poppler, so it should be unrelated
to the workaround mentioned above.
Maybe just try to wipe all the teTeX stuff and make a clean start
with print/texlive. It works in my Tinderbox, so the installation
procedure should be fine.
Ok, it seems that a few files were accidentally deleted in the process
of replacing teTeX with Tex Live. I reinstalled the Tex Live ports, and
the error disappeared.
Do you by any chance remember all the tetex related things you needed
to remove? I'd like to add them to CONFLICTS.
However, I noticed a problem with the symlinks in print/texlive-base.
For instance, /usr/local/bin/mktexfmt pointed to fmtutil at first, but
this line in post-install:
link=${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf$${link##*/texmf};
changed it to /usr/local/share/texmffmtutil. Not all the symlinks need
to be modified.
Thanks for that one, it didn't cause problems with doxygen or any of the
tex docs I have lying around, so I suppose this one was difficult to find.
I've attached a fix although it's not very elegant (everything worked as
expected after the symlinks were fixed).
Doing it that way was a bad idea from the start. You'll like the way
I do it in the updated patch better.
I also reworked texlive-texmf
to build the plist and install the files at the same time to make it run
faster.
That shouldn't be working, because generate-plist is run before
do-install. Run:
# pkg_info -Lx texlive-texmf
And check whether it lists any files.
Thanks for all the time and effort you put into porting Tex Live! It
would be great to see TeX Live replace teTeX, regardless of whose port
is used.
Yes, definitely!
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Hi,
On 14/08/2012 03:49, Denny Lin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 13/08/2012 04:45, Denny Lin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
Adding this line to print/texlive-base/Makefile should remove the need
to patch graphics/poppler:
CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
I still think this is a proplem of poppler, so it should be fixed
there. However, I agree the way I go about fixing it is not optimal.
So I have updated the patch. Still not satisfactory, but maybe a
little better.
texlinks: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
Something must have gone wrong with texlive-texmf. The file should be
in ${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
I tried searching for fmtutil.cnf:
# find work/texlive-20120701-source/ -name fmtutil.cnf
work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/tetex/fmtutil.cnf
This error occurs even when I patched poppler, so it should be unrelated
to the workaround mentioned above.
Maybe just try to wipe all the teTeX stuff and make a clean start
with print/texlive. It works in my Tinderbox, so the installation
procedure should be fine.
Ok, it seems that a few files were accidentally deleted in the process
of replacing teTeX with Tex Live. I reinstalled the Tex Live ports, and
the error disappeared.
Do you by any chance remember all the tetex related things you needed
to remove? I'd like to add them to CONFLICTS.
However, I noticed a problem with the symlinks in print/texlive-base.
For instance, /usr/local/bin/mktexfmt pointed to fmtutil at first, but
this line in post-install:
link=${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf$${link##*/texmf};
changed it to /usr/local/share/texmffmtutil. Not all the symlinks need
to be modified.
Thanks for that one, it didn't cause problems with doxygen or any of the
tex docs I have lying around, so I suppose this one was difficult to find.
I've attached a fix although it's not very elegant (everything worked as
expected after the symlinks were fixed).
Doing it that way was a bad idea from the start. You'll like the way
I do it in the updated patch better.
I also reworked texlive-texmf
to build the plist and install the files at the same time to make it run
faster.
That shouldn't be working, because generate-plist is run before
do-install. Run:
# pkg_info -Lx texlive-texmf
And check whether it lists any files.
Yes, you are correct. The plist is empty. It looks like this method
won't work.
Do all the files in texlive-20120701-texmf.tar.xz really have to be
installed for Tex Live to work? Some of the packages for Linux are
nowhere near 2 GB. We might be able to just install commonly used files.
--
Denny Lin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On 13/08/2012 04:45, Denny Lin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
# mkdir ~/texlive
# cd ~/texlive
# fetch
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# cd /usr
# patch ~/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
# sh ~/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# portmaster graphics/poppler
Adding this line to print/texlive-base/Makefile should remove the need
to patch graphics/poppler:
CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
If you don't have teTeX installed:
# portmaster print/texlive
If you have teTeX installed:
# portmaster -o print/texlive-texmf print/teTeX-texmf
# portmaster -o print/texlive-base print/teTeX-base
# portmaster -o print/texlive print/teTeX
This probably needs to be run before portmaster if teTeX is installed:
# pkg_delete -f 'dvipsk-tetex-*'
# pkg_delete -f 'xdvik-tetex-*'
print/texlive-base fails to build/install for some reason:
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk'
texlinks: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
Something must have gone wrong with texlive-texmf. The file should be
in ${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
I tried searching for fmtutil.cnf:
# find work/texlive-20120701-source/ -name fmtutil.cnf
work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/tetex/fmtutil.cnf
This error occurs even when I patched poppler, so it should be unrelated
to the workaround mentioned above.
Maybe just try to wipe all the teTeX stuff and make a clean start
with print/texlive. It works in my Tinderbox, so the installation
procedure should be fine.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 13/08/2012 04:45, Denny Lin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
# mkdir ~/texlive
# cd ~/texlive
# fetch
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# cd /usr
# patch ~/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
# sh ~/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# portmaster graphics/poppler
Adding this line to print/texlive-base/Makefile should remove the need
to patch graphics/poppler:
CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
If you don't have teTeX installed:
# portmaster print/texlive
If you have teTeX installed:
# portmaster -o print/texlive-texmf print/teTeX-texmf
# portmaster -o print/texlive-base print/teTeX-base
# portmaster -o print/texlive print/teTeX
This probably needs to be run before portmaster if teTeX is installed:
# pkg_delete -f 'dvipsk-tetex-*'
# pkg_delete -f 'xdvik-tetex-*'
print/texlive-base fails to build/install for some reason:
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk'
texlinks: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
Something must have gone wrong with texlive-texmf. The file should be
in ${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
I tried searching for fmtutil.cnf:
# find work/texlive-20120701-source/ -name fmtutil.cnf
work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/tetex/fmtutil.cnf
This error occurs even when I patched poppler, so it should be unrelated
to the workaround mentioned above.
Maybe just try to wipe all the teTeX stuff and make a clean start
with print/texlive. It works in my Tinderbox, so the installation
procedure should be fine.
Ok, it seems that a few files were accidentally deleted in the process
of replacing teTeX with Tex Live. I reinstalled the Tex Live ports, and
the error disappeared.
However, I noticed a problem with the symlinks in print/texlive-base.
For instance, /usr/local/bin/mktexfmt pointed to fmtutil at first, but
this line in post-install:
link=${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf$${link##*/texmf};
changed it to /usr/local/share/texmffmtutil. Not all the symlinks need
to be modified.
I've attached a fix although it's not very elegant (everything worked as
expected after the symlinks were fixed). I also reworked texlive-texmf
to build the plist and install the files at the same time to make it run
faster.
Thanks for all the time and effort you put into porting Tex Live! It
would be great to see TeX Live replace teTeX, regardless of whose port
is used.
--
Denny Lin
--- print/texlive-base/Makefile.orig 2012-08-14 00:21:52.0 +0800
+++ print/texlive-base/Makefile 2012-08-14 09:36:09.0 +0800
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@
--with-system-libpng \
--with-system-zlib
+CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
+
PLIST_TMP= ${WRKDIR}/plist_tmp/
PLIST_REPL= -e s|${PLIST_TMP}||1 \
-e /^man\//d \
@@ -87,7 +89,7 @@
@for bin in $$(${SED} -ne 's,^bin/,${PREFIX}/bin/,p' ${PLIST}); do \
${TEST} -h $$bin || continue; \
link=$$(${READLINK_CMD} $$bin); \
- link=${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf$${link##*/texmf}; \
+ link=$$(${ECHO} $$link | ${SED} -e 's,.*/texmf,${LOCALBASE}/share/texmf,1'); \
${RM} $$bin; \
${LN} -s $$link $$bin; done
@${SETENV} PATH=${PREFIX}/bin:$$PATH ${PREFIX}/bin/texlinks -v \
--- print/texlive-texmf/Makefile.orig 2012-08-14 00:19:50.0 +0800
+++ print/texlive-texmf/Makefile 2012-08-14 00:20:04.0 +0800
@@ -25,23 +25,18 @@
EXCLUDE_FILES+= --exclude '*/doc/*'
.endif
-PLIST_REPL+= -e 's|^${DISTNAME}/|share/|1' \
+PLIST_REPL+= -e 's|^x |share/|1' \
-e '/\/$$/{s,^,@dirrmtry ,${.newline}x${.newline}H${.newline}d${.newline}}' \
-e '$${p${.newline}x${.newline}}'
do-extract:
@${MKDIR} ${WRKDIR}
- @${EXTRACT_CMD} ${EXTRACT_BEFORE_ARGS} ${DISTDIR}/${DISTFILES} \
- ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}.tar
-
-do-build:
- @${TAR} -tf ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}.tar ${EXCLUDE_FILES} \
- | ${SED} ${PLIST_REPL} ${PLIST}
do-install:
@${MKDIR} ${PREFIX}/share
- @${TAR} -vxf ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}.tar ${EXCLUDE_FILES} \
- -C ${PREFIX}/share --strip-components 1
+ @${TAR} -vxf ${DISTDIR}/${DISTFILES} ${EXCLUDE_FILES} \
+ -C ${PREFIX}/share --strip-components 1 21 \
+ | ${SED} ${PLIST_REPL} ${PLIST}
@${REINPLACE_CMD} \
's,^TEXMFROOT[[:space:]]*=.*,TEXMFROOT = ${PREFIX}/share,' \
${PREFIX}/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
[CFT] TexLive port
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement for teTex. ... Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to have some volunteers in a week. Here we go: http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ # mkdir ~/texlive # cd ~/texlive # fetch http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt # cd /usr # patch ~/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt # sh ~/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt # portmaster graphics/poppler If you don't have teTeX installed: # portmaster print/texlive If you have teTeX installed: # portmaster -o print/texlive-texmf print/teTeX-texmf # portmaster -o print/texlive-base print/teTeX-base # portmaster -o print/texlive print/teTeX The texlive-texmf distfile is huge and ftp.tug.org is slow. If somebody knows any mirrors, please let me know! Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement for teTex. ... Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to have some volunteers in a week. Here we go: http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ # mkdir ~/texlive # cd ~/texlive # fetch http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt # cd /usr # patch ~/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt # sh ~/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt # portmaster graphics/poppler If you don't have teTeX installed: # portmaster print/texlive If you have teTeX installed: # portmaster -o print/texlive-texmf print/teTeX-texmf # portmaster -o print/texlive-base print/teTeX-base # portmaster -o print/texlive print/teTeX The texlive-texmf distfile is huge and ftp.tug.org is slow. If somebody knows any mirrors, please let me know! Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hi, First thanks for this work. Are you aware of: http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ ? romain@ has been working and maintaining those ports for a while and has plan to merge them into the ports tree once he is back from vacations (in about a month iirc) did you contact him? maybe both of your work can be merged? I know hrs@ also has/had? plan about texlive, merging the effort and plan could be good. regards, Bapt pgpxterGhWgOY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
Hello, On 12/08/2012 10:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: ... Here we go: Are you aware of: http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ ? romain@ has been working and maintaining those ports for a while and has plan to merge them into the ports tree once he is back from vacations (in about a month iirc) did you contact him? maybe both of your work can be merged? I know hrs@ also has/had? plan about texlive, merging the effort and plan could be good. Yes, I became aware when I tried to find out why there is no TeX Live port. I looked at it and dismissed it as more complicated than creating my own port. Our approaches are quite orthogonal. Whereas he uses the CTAN thingy to assemble all the parts that make up a TeX Live distribution, I simply grab the release tarballs and slab them onto the system. I expect both ports are pretty complete by now. I'd say I open the PR, he can submit his port for review into the same or another PR and we let the community discuss which is their preferred approach. His is definitely more fine grained and customizable, mine is probably easier to maintain. I'd be content with either solution so long as a TeX Live port makes it into the tree soon. It's always good to throw away stuff to make space for something better. So don't hesitate to declare my port inferior if that is your opinion. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] TexLive port
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
# mkdir ~/texlive
# cd ~/texlive
# fetch
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# cd /usr
# patch ~/texlive/patch-ports-graphics-poppler.txt
# sh ~/texlive/shar-ports-print-texlive.txt
# portmaster graphics/poppler
Adding this line to print/texlive-base/Makefile should remove the need
to patch graphics/poppler:
CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
If you don't have teTeX installed:
# portmaster print/texlive
If you have teTeX installed:
# portmaster -o print/texlive-texmf print/teTeX-texmf
# portmaster -o print/texlive-base print/teTeX-base
# portmaster -o print/texlive print/teTeX
This probably needs to be run before portmaster if teTeX is installed:
# pkg_delete -f 'dvipsk-tetex-*'
# pkg_delete -f 'xdvik-tetex-*'
print/texlive-base fails to build/install for some reason:
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/texlive'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/texlive-base/work/texlive-20120701-source/texk'
texlinks: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
I tried searching for fmtutil.cnf:
# find work/texlive-20120701-source/ -name fmtutil.cnf
work/texlive-20120701-source/texk/tetex/fmtutil.cnf
This error occurs even when I patched poppler, so it should be unrelated
to the workaround mentioned above.
--
Denny Lin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
