Re: Question about pkg-plist
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:36:06 +0100 david fries wrote: > Thanks! > > I'll go for the second variant then since the LICENSE is installed > regardless of NOPORTDOCS. We don't care for top-posting. You should patch the port, if possible, to achieve the former variant. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Question about pkg-plist
Thanks! I'll go for the second variant then since the LICENSE is installed regardless of NOPORTDOCS. On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 22:04 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:27:53 +0100 > david fries wrote: > > > Hello everybody > > > > I'm currently working on a tiny little port. It consists of a single > > binary and an accompanying LICENSE file. When I ran genplist, it > > generated this in pkg-plist.new: > > > > bin/mybinary > > %%PORTDOCSDOCSDIR%%/LICENSE > > %%portdoc...@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% > > > > Simple enough. However, I also know that the LICENSE file will also be > > installed if NOPORTDOCS has been defined. I thought maybe I should > > write something like this. > > > > bin/mybinary > > %%DOCSDIR%%/LICENSE > > @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% > > If you install the LICENCE file depending on NOPORTDOCS, the you should > keep the first variant; if not, the second. First is what you should do. > > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Question about pkg-plist
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:27:53 +0100 david fries wrote: > Hello everybody > > I'm currently working on a tiny little port. It consists of a single > binary and an accompanying LICENSE file. When I ran genplist, it > generated this in pkg-plist.new: > > bin/mybinary > %%PORTDOCSDOCSDIR%%/LICENSE > %%portdoc...@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% > > Simple enough. However, I also know that the LICENSE file will also be > installed if NOPORTDOCS has been defined. I thought maybe I should > write something like this. > > bin/mybinary > %%DOCSDIR%%/LICENSE > @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% If you install the LICENCE file depending on NOPORTDOCS, the you should keep the first variant; if not, the second. First is what you should do. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Question about pkg-plist
Hello everybody I'm currently working on a tiny little port. It consists of a single binary and an accompanying LICENSE file. When I ran genplist, it generated this in pkg-plist.new: bin/mybinary %%PORTDOCSDOCSDIR%%/LICENSE %%portdoc...@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% Simple enough. However, I also know that the LICENSE file will also be installed if NOPORTDOCS has been defined. I thought maybe I should write something like this. bin/mybinary %%DOCSDIR%%/LICENSE @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% Otherwise I might forget to remove LICENSE if the port was built with NOPORTDOCS defined. Am I correct about this? Or is the build system smart enough to work with the auto generated plist? BTW what the simplest way to do genplist create with NOPORTDOCS defined? Do I have to put it in the environment before running genplist create? regards, dave ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Question about pkg-plist of qlwm port
alfredo perez wrote: Hi, I am working on updating this port x11-wm/qlwm to version 4.0 and I noticed that the port does not have pkg-plist file, Is it that possible? So , I guess I should create one if I want to update it, right? I would spend a little more time thoroughly examining the port's Makefile first, followed by some time brushing up on http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html hope this helps, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Question about pkg-plist of qlwm port
Hi, I am working on updating this port x11-wm/qlwm to version 4.0 and I noticed that the port does not have pkg-plist file, Is it that possible? So , I guess I should create one if I want to update it, right? Thanks in advance Alfredo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
