Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:33:46AM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > Hello, > > Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver > independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did > this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to > hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request. I think this is more correct variant: $cat /etc/libmap.conf #nvidia-driver [/usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1] libm.so.3 libm.so.4 [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1] libc.so.5 libc.so.6 [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1] libc.so.5 libc.so.6 [/usr/local/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1] libm.so.3 libm.so.4 [/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so] libm.so.3 libm.so.4 librpcsvc.so.2 librpcsvc.so.3 -- Adios ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:33:46 -0200 "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver > independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did > this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to > hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request. Personally I'd rather keep misc/compat5x than have the hassle of maintaining libmap.conf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On 10/27/07, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/27/07, Alex Kozlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:33:46AM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver > > > independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did > > > this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to > > > hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request. > > I think this is more correct variant: > > > > $cat /etc/libmap.conf > > #nvidia-driver > > [/usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1] > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1] > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1] > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1] > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > Ah, I forgot that one. Good catch. > > > [/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so] > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > librpcsvc.so.2 librpcsvc.so.3 > > If I specify the full path the mapping does not work. The X server > still loades, but gives me the following message: > > dlopen: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by "libwfb.so" > > Additionally, I believe the we should not specify full paths in the > mappings. If we do so, then we must provide them for both /usr/local > (Xorg 7 and above) and for /usr/X11R6. This is because the user may > still have applications linked to libGL.so.1 with the argument "-R > /usr/X11R6/lib" given to ld. libmap libmap doe not translate the path > by means of the symbolic link /usr/X11R6. ... so my patch now becomes the one provided below. Extract it piping this message to b64decode -o /dev/stdout | gzip -d > nvidia-driver.diff CC to the port maintainer now. I suppose that he subscribes the list but, well, just in case. -- Carlos A. M. dos Santos begin-base64 644 nvidia-driver.diff.gz H4sIAOfaI0cAA61V227aQBB9xl8xouXJ+AYBGktUQHFSS9yEaZqqqtDaXsMqttfympui/HvHJg1R IQmtIln24pk5Mz5nZvBZEIDir1JIeJoJladsoW0NQ4vXzGdE8VO2pqk2JHc0YCHde73iICmKch5U achjcGgCRgv0mlnDqw41XW9Jsiy/mafkkAzGXga1FhiGaTRM42If3emA8qlRbYGM90vodCRQaeyz QAI8sQA+3o+dG2vq2OPRA3xuQ1PX9XpdUgZ2b963Jtao78jtUqTWzY/3k/F05vTt6YMWMeFpHo8S kjW2kux8680HtjNDz5Fl9fHcG3Yn7XJZklUaCvqyRwdBIhpnUH5eWMJFpiC2tzRBdeyBNZpJ/nna 5HQILblbKBEVgiyoyuIX+Tvl/LZmp6IK/bqrBbIO+qXZaJp68239TiI90xLb4EI3a82DloZebYKM 97peiClBxmHHkRXN5TzTQk58mqoejwMVrXKl8ozuSuUHXwEJBYeYUj8PJT4+lhQCHoZ8w+IFhCym 4oBKM08LmRuRpAA1jyCPXpQ+QHxj9+0ujBMaXw8Q0U1Jujt2/ImW64EquGr8OrbmWXNbvVR6Ol+c kT5HfaTZCxbvjf73x+2VPF3FJnAR9r+T56Y08cTay+21ve/hRf1fqr1dvy7D7Xr4ZVS4vkJYkbax r6M4N8+U44A+93cxiZj3zllm2ML7xiUuX1MgKcUW9/KhSneAG+AqpbTn9KGpboHE/qObSz2yEjSf gCPIPV0MIZOUYzvhvLi7P3Tm+O6KhRkOTvoE3lC36nGtYAf5LBX++bAxUewD2LBsCd/t2df51dSy MH7evZ60d1RUIcK9DmKFSfLAJVlTCcgiUe843NE0piFE3F/hH1C+gnGH+MU3sVhkJMRfVRAs9pCB YgryqA0LQwl8ij3rA24qllUBC8+R93P+CPuEVxRX9umaIQ6mLqsAY6QpVaTf1wNzbSUHAAA= ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:33:46 -0500, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request. I object, this is much worst than depend on misc/compat5x. Cheers, Mezz -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:53:30PM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > [/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > librpcsvc.so.2 librpcsvc.so.3 > > > > If I specify the full path the mapping does not work. The X server > > still loades, but gives me the following message: > > > > dlopen: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by "libwfb.so" Sorry. I use nvidia-driver-96xx, so I was not be able to test libwfb case. > ... so my patch now becomes the one provided below. Extract it piping > this message to > > b64decode -o /dev/stdout | gzip -d > nvidia-driver.diff > > CC to the port maintainer now. I suppose that he subscribes the list > but, well, just in case. Also, I think that libmap trick is good for local hack, but must not be applied by default in port. Print libmap suggestion from pre-everything will be enough. -- Adios ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
Hello, I talked with some people and concluded that using misc/compat5x is a matter of personal taste. It should not be the default choice. The best approach is give the user the right to choose between using libmap or not. So now my patch is the one shown below. Extract it piping this message to b64decode -o /dev/stdout | gzip -d > nvidia-driver.diff Thanks to Alex Kozlov, RW (?), and Jeremy Messenger for their comments. -- Carlos A. M. dos Santos begin-base64 644 nvidia-driver.diff.gz H4sIACf4JEcAA6VVa2/aShD9bP+KEbeRWhk/wIEkqFQkhaaWACNMmlRXFbK9a1hhey2vIUFV/ntn bUIelzS9qmT5MTN7zszs2TFhUQQ6WeeQ8bwQBs/ZwrxrNMx0wwjzdZKzDc3Nkb+iEYtpFfWbAFXX 9T+DUkY8BY9m0DgBq9lp4mVD07JOVE3T3uRRvHUKblhA8xQap53js/3qXg/041a9DRreGxb0eiqo YLA0jNeEwsdAEEOiG1lOjWT1Cb2awSJ499P1vg2mnuOO7+FTF9qWZdm2qrmTGZo8rasMnYvR+URR aleCQsyCxM8g4jl8ySm98PrQMu4g5EnmFyxgMSu2NeBRhOg0JQyfMgvJczO/dsZ993ruffdmg9E9 dLtQu+P5oqbCyO1fDQde35l2FaQwpdlMOFnHVKhw404v597VRVep1cpCT1v1E9BOz+qNZlnojgoe qA6XJH0E25hS8v7amX2dV5V9UDXExg9vtq+2i0RYQCzoQWcP601oWgCmjrZ5fzAZjPuyWYlhd979 nLjTmSzm3kyYCM2qO627fU+eJJxxUejoDZcdMDxnOBjPVPJn6pSCEGa2WugJFcJfUNztVxV0KPht 1R5aVSr4fL1A3YF11mm1O1b7bQUfRHqhZrtjnzyquWFJNePdflBzwWHLsStmwHlhxtwnNDdCnkaG VPPRUbU9R0ff+Rr8WHBIKSVylU/wsaQo2zjmtyxdoI5TKh4BaRGalbRLvM5TtKfvyj+QfnP6zjm4 GU0vh/I85H6+fRbzLxovh4bgRuPHM4dkkGZbUfbvx69SSZhdD8No8ddwLzOv9uU/jLdRgDj/k0ha 8ywUm1C6mlXYo8F+O6mbzautvNmMPo/LqMM9KClaFWf53v5tSx/h5mSb+gkL/xZ2tqQ7PfkB31Dw c4rKC6XM8y3gmXyYlG2clH5KdmEBDf01jlQU5lO0qg0M0bKc4/ajgoPtQ5skdLBmcfFyAhvPkgMn ksIuQ6XymSjPJdyyYgnl6PsyHQxw6fz8ctLdUlGHBP8wINaILxcu/Q1VwV9kxorDiuYpjaEax+Wo x7NMykpYKgo/xq86CPzVYN2lYOWqWxbHKs5bVBsBnBisqAPmLJGrQ7eD3eOVydUI3TDEQeqaAeBi c3Jd/QVlskqprwcAAA== ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:53:30PM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On 10/27/07, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/27/07, Alex Kozlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:33:46AM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver > > > > independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did > > > > this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would like to > > > > hear some comments before submitting a PR with a change request. What is the problem using compat5x in the first place? > > > I think this is more correct variant: > > > > > > $cat /etc/libmap.conf > > > #nvidia-driver > > > [/usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1] > > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1] > > > libc.so.5 libc.so.6 > > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/libnvidia-cfg.so.1] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > > Ah, I forgot that one. Good catch. > > > > > [/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so] > > > libm.so.3 libm.so.4 > > > librpcsvc.so.2 librpcsvc.so.3 That's potentially unsafe to put next .so version of library when the code expects previous one. It *may* work, but be prepared for all sorts of incompatibilities and ABI breakage. ./danfe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
