Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On 2/27/20 3:54 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
"timidity"
pkg install libarc
It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this
way.
Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of
the timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time
dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.
Maybe there is some bug with
.if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)
during package building?
No idea...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
"timidity"
pkg install libarc
It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time dependency
here. Maybe just an oversight.
Maybe there is some bug with
.if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)
during package building?
Marcin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
"timidity"
pkg install libarc
It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time
dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.
I've committed a patch in r527232
Cheers,
Mateusz
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
"timidity"
pkg install libarc
It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
--HPS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
"timidity"
pkg install libarc
It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the
timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
Cheers,
Mateusz
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by "timidity" pkg install libarc and it works. --HPS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" I'll take a look. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
Hi, ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by "timidity" pkg install libarc and it works. --HPS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
