Where does NIC driver lies in freebsd kernel ?
Hello Sir ! Sir i facing some silly problems , problems are :: 1. Where does source code of NIC driver lies on my freebsd 4.7 kernel ? 2. Can you please provide me some examples of implementing netgraph nodes ( if possible send some helpful links also ) Please reply soon... best regards manish Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.Download now. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Packages with older dependencies
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 08:43:30AM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I assume i can force the install with the -f flag, but I wanted to know > if there are any ramifications to doing this on future updates or to > future program installs? You don't have to force anything because they're warnings, not errors. The possible ramification is that the software may not work if it requires a feature or bug fix that is not present in the older versions you have installed. > What is the easiest way to install gaim (or any > program for that matter) when a situation such as this arises? What > would have happened if I attemted the install via ports instead? Use portupgrade to update your ports in dependency order. YOu can still use the packages if you like. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I can't install FreeBSD5.0 or FreeBSD5.1R on Dual Computer ....
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:45 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi Everybody , > > > I can't install FreeBSD on my Dual Computer .. > > When I boot the computer for install FreeBSD from 5.0 CD it stopped > on TimeCounter "ACPI-SAFE" frequency 3579545 line ... > > After That I try to install from 5.1 CD it stopped on same line ... > > > But I can install FreeBSD 4.9 without problem > > I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it > with DUAL INTEL 1.0B too > > > Thanks ... > Vahric MUHTARYAN > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Have a look at the release notes for 5.x. Here are the english ones http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/hardware-i386.html Here is the bit I think may be of use to you. It may not be the answer but it may help. Most modern laptops (as well as many desktops) use the Advanced Configuration and Power Management (ACPI) standard. FreeBSD supports ACPI via the ACPI Component Architecture reference implementation from Intel, as described in the acpi(4) manual page. The use of ACPI causes instabilities on some machines and it may be necessary to disable the ACPI driver, which is normally loaded via a kernel module. This may be accomplished by adding the following line to /boot/device.hints: hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" Users debugging ACPI-related problems may find it useful to disable portions of the ACPI functionality. The acpi(4) manual page has more information on how to do this via loader tunables. ACPI depends on a Differentiated System Descriptor Table (DSDT) provided by each machine's BIOS. Some machines have bad or incomplete DSDTs, which prevents ACPI from functioning correctly. Replacement DSDTs for some machines can be found at the DSDT section of the ACPI4Linux project Web site. FreeBSD can use these DSDTs to override the DSDT provided by the BIOS; see the acpi(4) manual page for more information. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: X setup on new install fails
Strangest thing, even though X failed during the initial setup during the initial install of 5.1, after booting into BSD I decided to try a startx anyway, and guess what - it works! What a deal! -- Chip Chip Wiegand wrote: I am trying to install 5.1 and it installs fine until I try to set up X. I know the exact video card and monitor details, the video card is even on the list of drivers - Cirrus Logic GLGD5446. No matter what I choose in the setup screens it always fails. Is there something wrong with the X setup on the 5.1 release cds? Thanks Chip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" . ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! The second cpu is going as stated above as opposed to the first cpu #0 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
X setup on new install fails
I am trying to install 5.1 and it installs fine until I try to set up X. I know the exact video card and monitor details, the video card is even on the list of drivers - Cirrus Logic GLGD5446. No matter what I choose in the setup screens it always fails. Is there something wrong with the X setup on the 5.1 release cds? Thanks Chip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Using maildrop from sendmail aliases file
"W. Sierke" wrote: > I am attempting to configure sendmail to pass mail addressed to a particular > domain to maildrop. ... > I've added the following to the sendmail configuration: > > in /etc/mail/virtusertable > ... > @second.domain.tldsecond-domain-tld > > > and in /etc/mail/aliases > ... > second-domain-tld:"| /usr/local/bin/maildrop -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > It looks as though it's ready to work except for this in /var/log/maillog: > ... > Dec 25 17:05:19 maildrop[75657]: Cannot set my user or group id. > > > Presumably this is because maildrop wants to set itself to run as user:vmail > and the existing setup I have works as-is because getmail (which calls > maildrop) is configured to run as user:vmail in /etc/crontab. More guessing (as I'm still not clear on the specifics of what is failing)... Is sendmail running as user:smmsp when it's calling maildrop? That would explain why maildrop isn't able to change itself to user:vmail, no? Should setting the setuid bit circumvent this? When I try that I get: Dec 26 15:08:20 maildrop[93442]: You are not a trusted user. where I guess "You" = smmsp? If this is the case, then it must be a problem for any program run from /etc/mail/aliases, is this just too hard to do on a default FreeBSD? Still out of my depth here but learning a bit more. :) Wayne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[no subject]
hey, i'd like to ask.. how do i make the ip's for Mirc cuz i've bEen noticing that quite a number of the chatters using the ip from freebsd.com.. hope u can tell me how to do it? thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Using maildrop from sendmail aliases file
"W. Sierke" wrote: > I am attempting to configure sendmail to pass mail addressed to a particular > domain to maildrop. ... > I've added the following to the sendmail configuration: > > in /etc/mail/virtusertable > ... > @second.domain.tldsecond-domain-tld > > > and in /etc/mail/aliases > ... > second-domain-tld:"| /usr/local/bin/maildrop -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > It looks as though it's ready to work except for this in /var/log/maillog: > ... > Dec 25 17:05:19 maildrop[75657]: Cannot set my user or group id. > > > Presumably this is because maildrop wants to set itself to run as user:vmail > and the existing setup I have works as-is because getmail (which calls > maildrop) is configured to run as user:vmail in /etc/crontab. More guessing (as I'm still not clear on the specifics of what is failing)... Is sendmail running as user:smmsp when it's calling maildrop? That would explain why maildrop isn't able to change itself to user:vmail, no? Should setting the setuid bit circumvent this? When I try that I get: Dec 26 15:08:20 maildrop[93442]: You are not a trusted user. where I guess "You" = smmsp? If this is the case, then it must be a problem for any program run from /etc/mail/aliases, is this just too hard to do on a default FreeBSD? Still out of my depth here but learning a bit more. :) Wayne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
(B- Original Message - (BFrom: "horio shoichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (BTo: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (BCc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (BSent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 7:32 PM (BSubject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... (B (B (B> On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 18:54:26 +0200 (B> "Vahric MUHTARYAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B> > Hi , (B> > (B> > I checked LINT it said that I have to disabke I386 AND I486 from (B> > kernel .. I marked those values from GENERIC and LINT too and recompile (Bit . (B> > (B> > But I can't see any changes (B> > (B> > Then I checked my messages file (B> > (B> > (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor (Bmotherboard: (B> > 2 CPUs (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 3, version: (B> > 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: (B> > 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io0 (APIC): apic id: 4, version: (B> > 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io1 (APIC): apic id: 5, version: (B> > 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 (B> > (B> > Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (B> > (B> > And this is my sysctl out (B> > (B> > freebsdcgp# sysctl hw.ncpu (B> > hw.ncpu: 2 (B> > (B> > (B> > But when I run top utulity there is only one CPU there .. (B> > (B> > Now I will try cvsup RELENG_4 ... Maybe I can handle it ... (B> > Does anybody have advise ?! (B> > (B> > Vahri__... (B> > (B (BTop on a Dual CPU system looks like this: (B (Blast pid: 97678; load averages: 0.00, 0.07, 0.06up (B13+13:04:44 21:40:15 (B62 processes: 1 running, 61 sleeping (BCPU states: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.4% interrupt, 99.0% (Bidle (BMem: 126M Active, 528M Inact, 138M Wired, 46M Cache, 112M Buf, 165M Free (BSwap: 2048M Total, 140K Used, 2048M Free (B (BPID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU (BCOMMAND (B2594 mailman 2 0 7032K 5680K poll 1 3:20 0.00% 0.00% (Bpython (B2590 mailman 2 0 7044K 5684K poll 0 3:13 0.00% 0.00% (Bpython (B (BThere will be a 0 or 1 in the C column. That indicates the CPU the process (Bis on. The "CPU states" is a combination of both cpu's if I recall (Bcorrectly. Also, if you watch your STATE column while running Top, you can (Bsee after some time that Top is handed back and forth between the CPU's. In (Bthe above list, I have one mailman process running on cpu0 and one on cpu1. (B (B-- (B (BMicheal Patterson (BNetwork Administration (BTSG Incorporated (B405-917-0600 (B (B___ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (Bhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions (BTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Fixing an Assimilated MBR?
Is there an "official" way to fix an MBR that has been overwritten such that there is still a valid partition table and valid MBR, but not the one you want? Like usual upon inserting a Windows CD and booting off it my MBR was changed to that of the operating system for the CD; leaving me unable to get to the fancy FreeBSD boot loader I've come to love. I was able to rig it back by going into the custom installation option and just setting a drive as active and choosing to reload the MBR. However, it isn't readily apparent that this is what is happening as sysinstall will then complain about different things before rewriting the MBR/partition table. However, it does work... It would be nice if there was an option in the Custom menu to just analyze the partition table and allow the user to chooce to (re)install the boot manager; without being prompted to label. -- Ryan "leadZERO" Sommers Gamer's Impact President [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 1019590 AIM/MSN: leadZERO -= http://www.gamersimpact.com =- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wine and game support.
High all, I would just like to know if anyone has wine installed and can play shadowbane and some blizzard games. I'm trying to quit dual booting(and crashing in win98). I can't find any info anywhere on shadowbane, but I read where starcraft works well, but has no fonts on bnet. Any info on these games and warcraft3 would be appreciated. Jason ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: need learning direction suggestions on using editors
"Zhang Weiwu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig > into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many > programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe > none? Maybe many? The vi in FreeBSD's base system is not derived from the original UC Berkeley distributions. It is actually nvi. [I don't know whether you care about this distinction, but it seemed possible...] -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 18:54:26 +0200 (B"Vahric MUHTARYAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B> Hi , (B> (B> I checked LINT it said that I have to disabke I386 AND I486 from (B> kernel .. I marked those values from GENERIC and LINT too and recompile it . (B> (B> But I can't see any changes (B> (B> Then I checked my messages file (B> (B> (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: (B> 2 CPUs (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 3, version: (B> 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: (B> 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io0 (APIC): apic id: 4, version: (B> 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io1 (APIC): apic id: 5, version: (B> 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 (B> (B> Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (B> (B> And this is my sysctl out (B> (B> freebsdcgp# sysctl hw.ncpu (B> hw.ncpu: 2 (B> (B> (B> But when I run top utulity there is only one CPU there .. (B> (B> Now I will try cvsup RELENG_4 ... Maybe I can handle it ... (B> Does anybody have advise ?! (B> (B> Vahri__... (B> (B> (B> (B> -Original Message- (B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fbsd_user (B> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 5:28 PM (B> To: Vahric MUHTARYAN; [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B> Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... (B> (B> Answer to your ? 1. 98% of FBSD users do not have 2 cpu (B> motherboards so default GENERIC kernel is configured for them and (B> not for you. (B> (B> Answer to your ? 2. Read through the LINT kernel source to see if (B> you missed some other kernel option needed to enable the kind of 2 (B> cpu motherboard you have. (B> (B> (B> (B> -Original Message- (B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vahric (B> MUHTARYAN (B> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:18 AM (B> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B> Subject: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... (B> (B> Hi Everybody , (B> (B> I have two question about SMP . (B> (B> First Why FreeBSD is installing OS with single Cpu default (B> ?!! Why (B> it can't enable SMP support at installation time ?! (B> (B> Second when I compile kernel with SMP Support FreeBSD 4.9 (B> can find (B> second CPU ?! What do I have to check why it can't find it ?! (B> (B> I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it (B> with (B> DUAL INTEL 1.0B too (B> (B> (B> Vahric (B> (B> (B> (B> (B> ___ (B> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (B> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions (B> To unsubscribe, send any mail to (B> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (B> (B> ___ (B> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (B> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions (B> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (B> (B> ___ (B> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (B> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions (B> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (B> (BYou seem to have missed the remaining, Mandatory, lines in LINT... (B (B# SMP OPTIONS: (B# (B# SMP enables building of a Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel. (B# APIC_IO enables the use of the IO APIC for Symmetric I/O. (B# (B# Notes: (B# (B# An SMP kernel will ONLY run on an Intel MP spec. qualified motherboard. (B# (B# Be sure to disable 'cpu I386_CPU' && 'cpu I486_CPU' for SMP kernels. (B# (B# Check the 'Rogue SMP hardware' section to see if additional options (B# are required by your hardware. (B# (B (B# Mandatory: (Boptions SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel (Boptions APIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O (B (B (B (BThere are other such as ACPI if you want to try. (B (B (B (Bhorio shoichi (B (B___ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (Bhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions (BTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SENDMAIL....
"Vahric MUHTARYAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to stop SENDMAIL and I configure SENDMAIL option NO in > rc.conf but it's still running ... Does another startup script than rc.conf > to stop SENDMAIL ... According to the manual, sendmail_enable (str) If set to ``YES'', run the sendmail(8) daemon at system boot time. If set to ``NONE'', do not run any sendmail(8) dae- mons at system boot time. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Swapped disks and now stuck in the mountroot> prompt
Hi, I've installed FreeBSD 4.9 via FTP on my T22-laptop while having the hard disk as my first disk on it and then I had to put that disk into the ultrabay and thus have made it the second disk. I know, that all I have to do is probably to edit the /etc/fstab but I can't get there - I'm stuck at the mountroot> prompt. I've tried all the possible combinations including the one which I'd expected to be correct: "ufs:/dev/ad2s1a" but they all fail with "Root mount failed: 22". The "?" at the mountroot> prompt does show "ad" device. And the lines in the grub/conf on the 1st hard drive which I use to load that 2nd hard drive look like: title FreeBSD root (hd1,0,a) kernel /boot/loader title OpenBSD root (hd1,1,a) chainloader +1 (The OpenBSD has worked already - I had booted /bsd.rd, mounted the / and edited the /etc/fstab). I couldn't find the answer in the Handbook or on Google yet... Any help? Thank you Alex ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Wire down PATA/SATA devices?
I've recently installed a new machine with FreeBSD 5.2-RC2. This box is equipped with removable drive trays, a Promise SATA RAID controller, and PATA/SATA controllers on the motherboard. ATA_STATIC_ID is enabled in the kernel so that disks names don't flip around when I remove a drive or insert another drive. I have the boot drive plugged into the first SATA port, but the default ordering is such that it ends up being labeled "ad12" on ata6, atapci2. Or basically, the default ordering is: Motherboard PATA, atapci1: - ata0 > ad0, ad1 - ata1 > ad2, ad3 Promise RAID, atapci0: - ata2 > ad4, ad5 - ata3 > ad6, ad7 - ata4 > ad8, ad9 - ata5 > ad10, ad11 Motherboard SATA, atapci2: - ata6 > ad12, ad13 - ata7 > ad14, ad15 I want the boot drive on the SATA port to be "ad0", but I haven't had any success trying to name it that way in /boot/device.hints, probably because the syntax for the example given for legacy PATA doesn't apply to SATA or the RAID card. How do I wire down each disk channel to the "adX" name I prefer? That's all that really matters, but I'd also like to know how to wire down the order of the atapci and ata devices, if that's possible? Thanks, Joe ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Messed up vinum volumes
On Wednesday, 24 December 2003 at 13:40:17 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, I realy need help with this ... > > I had 2 volumes on my system. I have two identical 30Gb > hard disk, I made one 25G, and a 3G partiton both, and > created a 25G mirror volume, and a 6Gig concatenated > volume (used as /usr) from these with vinum. It has > operated very vell, since I wanted to install additional > 2 drives (both identical 80G) but they already had data > on them (they were being operational in another machine as 2x80G > stripeset). Problem was .. I think .., that both the new > volumeset (2x80), and the old concatenated (2x3) were > being used under the same name : vol (/dev/vinum/vol). > Furthermore I have a small partition used as root partition > /dev/ad0sa1 128Mb on the original system, and > the /dev/ad2sa1 128Mb used as swap, so the rest > went for the vinum volumes. > > When I added the 2 piece of 80G drive and started > the system with 4 physical drives in it, I got an > error, that all volumes except root partition has > errors, and kicked back to single user mode. At this point, it was still possible to save the data. > I fsck-ed the mirror volume (I guess it was wrong :( but maybe not > ... I only had one question, and said yes to salvage) That could be OK. It's difficult to say now. > After that I wanted to check usr and got IO error. It come to my > mind that the old and new volumes may have the same name, so I have > removed the 2 \"new\" drives, and had a quick look on vinum list > after started with the original 2 drives only and realized the > following : > > 4 drives > D d1state: up /dev/ad0s1d A:3007/3008MB 100% > D d3state: up /dev/ad0s1e A:25428/25429MB 100% > > D d2state: up /dev/ad2s1d A:3007/3008MB 100% > D d4state: up /dev/ad2s1e A:0/25429MB 0% You shouldn't have more than one drive per spindle. > D vinumdrive0 state:referenced A:0/0MB > D vinumdrive1 state:referenced A:0/0MB > D *invalid* state:referenced A:0/0MB These last ones are hopefully the drive names of the drives you removed. > 2 volumes > V vol state: down Plexes: 1 Size: 149Gb > V mirrorstate: down Plexes: 2 Size: 24Gb > > 3 plexes > P vol.p0S state: faulty Subdisks: 2 Size: 149G > P mirror.p0 C state: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 24G > P mirorr.p1 C state: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 24G > > 4 subdisks > S vol.p0.s0 state: crashed D: vinumdrive0 Size: 74GB > S vol.p0.s1 state: crashed D: vinumdrive1 Size: 74Gb > S mirror.p0.s0 state: crashed D: *invalid* Size: 24Gb > S mirror.p1.s0 state: staleD: d4 Size: 24Gb Hmm. It looks as if you have saved the configuration for the new drives on the old drives. > So vol seems to be complettly wrong, since it can not be containing > 74Gb subdisks, since the whole physical disk is 30Gb only. Mirror > subdisks size is ok, but mirror is out of sync no doubt, but I have > absolutly no exeperience, whith such a situation, so a more > experienced, please help. Your best hope is to find the original configuration file you used to create the subdisks on the disks you still have. If you can do that and apply them, you may be able to save the situation. Alternatively, if you've made the mistake of putting only one subdisk per drive, and you can remember which had what, you may be able to recreate the configuration file like that. I'll do some thinking about how to stop this kind of problem happening again. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: How to find package name
Nope, sorry that will only get the name of installed ports and packages on your system. May be the readers missed the -r flag which means to fetch package from the FBSD FTP site. The FBSD online web site provides two aides to help in finding names. An category index with search capability into the ports collection http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html And the alphabetic list in port name order http://www.freebsd.org/ports/master-index.html After finding candidate, click on port download button and there is the real name of the port minus the suffix file Extentions. Every entry in the port system has one of these. Small percent have package download button also, which does return the package name minus the suffix file Extentions. Using interactive FTP looking at the package/latest directory it's very easy to see that most ports also have packages. What is the sure fire way using the above web site tools to find the package names? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan T. Sage Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to find package name fbsd_user wrote: > What is the sure fired way to get the correct spelling of the > package name to use with pkg_add -r command? > pkg_info | grep start.of.package.name i.e. # pkg_info | grep emacs xemacs-21.4.14 This port tracks the... xemacs-packages-10.0 Basic... *snips not included* hope this helps, happy holidays ~j -- Jonathan T. Sage Lighting & Scenic Design Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.theatre.msu.edu] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PGP: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to find package name
Jonathan T. Sage wrote: fbsd_user wrote: What is the sure fired way to get the correct spelling of the package name to use with pkg_add -r command? pkg_info | grep start.of.package.name i.e. # pkg_info | grep emacs xemacs-21.4.14 This port tracks the... xemacs-packages-10.0 Basic... *snips not included* hope this helps, happy holidays ~j of course, had i read the full question, i would have been a little more specifc for pkg_add, instead of pkg_delete. i usually use: # ftp ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/All/ *blah...* ftp> ls emacs* 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||62664|) 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for directory listing. -rw-r--r-- 1 110 root 8556988 Nov 11 11:39 emacs-19.34b.tgz *snip* ftp> exit # pkg_add -r emacs-19.34b.tgz also, pkg_add -r can take partials. i.e. pkg_add -r isc-dhcpd3 will install the latest isc-dhcpd3 version. ~j > ls emacs* -- Jonathan T. Sage Lighting & Scenic Design Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.theatre.msu.edu] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PGP: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How to find package name
fbsd_user wrote: What is the sure fired way to get the correct spelling of the package name to use with pkg_add -r command? pkg_info | grep start.of.package.name i.e. # pkg_info | grep emacs xemacs-21.4.14 This port tracks the... xemacs-packages-10.0 Basic... *snips not included* hope this helps, happy holidays ~j -- Jonathan T. Sage Lighting & Scenic Design Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.theatre.msu.edu] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PGP: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
How to find package name
What is the sure fired way to get the correct spelling of the package name to use with pkg_add -r command? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FTP command question
Solved the problem. It had nothing to do with FTP. It was the way I had DHCP configured. The FBSD LAN box was signed the last IP address, the one used for broadcast. After changing my DHCP config had no problem FTP and Telnet to LAN FBSD box. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of fbsd_user Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 2:30 PM To: Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: RE: FTP command question Gateway box is ip 10.0.10.2 running FBSD 4.7, intend active with ftp and telnet enabled. Have 2 boxes on lan, one win box and one FBSD 4.9 box. Win box can telnet and ftp to gateway fine. Lan FBSD 4.9 box has same telnet and ftp config as gateway. Can see intend running on both FBSD gateway and Lan boxes with ps ax command. Can ftp and telnet from Lan FBSD to gateway. Gateway box gets timed out, can not connect to 10.0.10.7 when trying to telnet or ftp to LAN box. Can ping LAN FBSD box ok. No firewall on lan box and gateway firewall only has rules to pass all on LAN interface. Lan FBSD box can access public internet. Ran cvsup job to install some port config files and it worked as expected. Just do not understand why gateway can not access FBSD lan box using telnet and ftp and always issues message connection: timed out. I never get to the point where I am asked for id and password. Any ideas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: FTP command question fbsd_user wrote: >I have an LAN FBSD box which has anonymous FTP server installed >from /stand/sysinstall. >I an trying to login to it from the FBSD gateway. >I use this command ftp -av 10.0.10.7 which is the ip address of the >target FBSD box. >This just hangs and does nothing. Ctrl + c exits ftp and returns >the command prompt. > >What is the correct syntax of the ftp command to open a interactive >ftp session >with the LAN FBSD box's anonymous FTP sever at ip address 10.0.10.7? > >Thanks and Marry Christmas > > > Try just $ftp 10.0.10.7 and login as "anonymous". -v is a default case, IIRC, so there'd be little difference. Perhaps you'll get some further information. No firewall, ACL's etc. on FTP box? Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Procmail + Mutt
Hi, I had the same problem sorting the eMails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 4.8 with Mutt 1.5 and Procmail 3.22 and have setup > some filters. In my .procmailrc I have the following > > :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD_Questions :0: * ^TO_questions > FreeBSD_Questions > > > :0: * .* Default > > And in my .muttrc file I have the following > > subscribe freebsd-questions subscribe freebsd subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > mailboxes =FreeBSD_Questions > > Sometimes I get e-mail in =Default that are sent to > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' why is this? I examined these eMails and found the following procmail-receipe work for me: ---8<-- :0: * ^Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD-Questions -->8--- Probably you can combine it with your receipe. HTH Sven -- Das Leben ist so hart, es sollte ein Job sein. Man sollte Geld dafuer verdienen, dass man es schafft --[rand. sig. #24] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Procmail + Mutt
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 03:43:01PM -0600, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 4.8 with Mutt 1.5 and Procmail 3.22 and have setup > some filters. In my .procmailrc I have the following > > :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD_Questions :0: * > ^TO_questions FreeBSD_Questions > That must read: :0: * ^(To|C[Cc]):[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-questions because sometimes people CC freebsd-questions hth Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Procmail + Mutt
I am using FreeBSD 4.8 with Mutt 1.5 and Procmail 3.22 and have setup some filters. In my .procmailrc I have the following :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD_Questions :0: * ^TO_questions FreeBSD_Questions :0: * .* Default And in my .muttrc file I have the following subscribe freebsd-questions subscribe freebsd subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxes =FreeBSD_Questions Sometimes I get e-mail in =Default that are sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' why is this? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SOLVED! -was Re: How do I disable plip probing on 4.9 install?
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:27:50 -0500 Eric Pogroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List, (and where/when appropriate, Seasons Greetings!): > > I'm having problems installing 4.9 release on a thinkpad 390x. I can get it > to boot, but it stalls at this point: > # > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic Chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE MODE > plip0: on ppbus0 > # > and the machine just hangs, and hangs, for up to an hour before > I just give in and turn it off. I've had OpenBSD, NetBSD, Linux, > and Solaris on this machine w/o issues, but would really > like to install 4.9 (the 5.x stuff does install, but is just too bloated > to live with another OS on my hard drive.). All of the 4.x install > Cd's/floppy's that I have (from 4.3 to 4.9) have this same problem. > > Can anyone let me know what the 'magic incantation' is for this, > or point me in the proper direction? > > Thanks! > > Eric > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hi all! I figured it out: at the inital loader prompt from the cd, during the countdown, I tapped the spacebar and passed 'boot -v' to the loader, and lo and behold, it scooted right by the former hang at plip0. Eric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Moving from a single to dual CPU setup
I acquired a SuperMicro dual slot one board a while ago (http:// www.supermicro.com/PRODUCT/MotherBoards/840/PIIIDME.htm), and was running a single PIII 450 in there for about a month. The system worked great. I decided to move to using dual processors, so I acquired 2 PIII 667 cpus. (According to Intel's site, they state it should work in a dual CPU setup). Now in my mind, Im thinking the process of moving from a single setup to a dual setup is -> 1. Make sure the system runs with one processor. 2. Install second processor. 3. Rebuild kernel for SMP operation For some reason, when I install the second processor, and boot the box, it hangs at random places during the boot process of FBSD. If I boot the box (with the 2 cpus installed), and go to the bios screen, it will sit there, and not hang. If I run FBSD with either one of the PIII 667s it will work great. So my question. Is there a particular sequence of events that must happen when going to a dual CPU setup?? If not, has anyone have any problems with the motherboard that Im using?? Currently using: 4.9-RELEASE-p1 Thanks for your advise.. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: SENDMAIL....
You true off sendmail totally in rc.conf with sendmail_enable="NONE" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vahric MUHTARYAN Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SENDMAIL Hi Everybody , I want to stop SENDMAIL and I configure SENDMAIL option NO in rc.conf but it's still running ... Does another startup script than rc.conf to stop SENDMAIL ... Or if you say it's piece of the base system I think I have to unmark #NO_SENDMAIL= true# do not build sendmail and related programs .. and make buildworld again ?! Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: need learning direction suggestions on using editors
Zhang Weiwu wrote: [ ... ] > Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig > into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many > programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe > none? Maybe many? There are reasonable people who use stock vi. I happen to prefer Emacs, which is probably better suited to the requirements you've listed (cc:'ed below). vi is much lighter-weight in terms of disk space and resource usage, although my fond(?) memories of a ~100K staticly-linked vi binary are outdated. :-) > I know very few about editors other than vi, if I'm going to learn > another editor now, I wish I can be using that forever, and I wish the > editor have good L10N (esp. Chinese). I do some Java program, php and > perl program but not C, and I'd likely to do these kind of program in > the coming years, so what is the best editor for my kind? One might consider: /usr/ports/chinese/emacs20 /usr/ports/editors/emacs21 > I'd like the editor's style to be accepted by readline so I can use > commandline and editor in the same way. FreeBSD uses GNU readline, which supports both Emacs-style and vi-style keybindings (RTM "man readline"), so don't worry about it. -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Apacer USB Flash drive
Hi! > Can't mount Apacer USB Flash drive in FreeBSD 4.8. > When I do: > > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /mnt > > I get: > > msdos: /dev/da0s1: Input/output error When you plug in the drive, is it recognized by the OS? It should print some lines to the console and to /var/log/messages. Also, some USB flash drives seem to be just quirky. I have something called Travelling Disk, and attempts to mount it can fail 10 times in a row and succeed 11th time (admittedly, this is with a year-old 4.7-STABLE system). Go figure... -- Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions - Bll Gats, 192 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SENDMAIL....
Hi Everybody , I want to stop SENDMAIL and I configure SENDMAIL option NO in rc.conf but it's still running ... Does another startup script than rc.conf to stop SENDMAIL ... Or if you say it's piece of the base system I think I have to unmark #NO_SENDMAIL= true# do not build sendmail and related programs .. and make buildworld again ?! Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: /usr/home directory
> usr comes > imo from users and isnt users/home quite logic place? Doesn't /usr come from Unix(R) System Resources ? -- Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * Atheism is a non-prophet organization. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem with ld-elf.so.1
On Thursday 25 December 2003 08:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What ever you do, upgrade portupgrade and its dependancies first. The > > current > > version will fix most bad situations that you would have had to delete > > packages and re-add them before. You may still have to do that because > > you > > have a corrupted setup. > > Many thanks I think it's improving! The origin of my problem could be > in the g++ compiler because some portupgrade !reports mention "new > compiler error". And Qt refuses to install arguing "system/compiler not > supported" . It sounds strange since I run 4.9-release. Which Qt are you trying to install? Qt-3.2.3 installed just fine on my systems. If Qt isn't installing, it sounds like you may have an old version of X-Windows. Paste the error messages and a pkg_info listing of your ports. I think someone will then have a better chance of understanding what the problem is. > > My g++ version is 2.95.4 20020320 is it the latest ? Yes, on 4.x. I think they are running 3.3 on 5.x. I can't be specific because I am doing some work on a web page on the machine that dual boots XP/FreeBSD 5.2-current. > > How can I upgrade it or change the version? I don't really think you need to at this point. The messages may mean something else. > > Thank you again for your answers to my questions. > No problem. I was/(still am) hard pressed to figure out a simple solution. I think most computer problems can be solved using the surgical scalpel approach and slashing away with a broad sword is totally alien to my nature. Unfortunately, there are times when you just have to stop, clean things out, and start over to get a clean, simple solution. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: top -- and dual cpu quesitons ...
Ok .. I expecting to see two processor. Because in Linux and SCO I can see two CPU output like this ... 7:22pm up 8 days, 23:32, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 180 processes: 179 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 0.0% user, 0.0% system, 0.0% nice, 100.0% idle CPU1 states: 0.0% user, 10.0% system, 0.0% nice, 89.0% idle Mem: 2064624K av, 1679408K used, 385216K free, 0K shrd, 215176K buff Swap: 2040244K av, 84K used, 2040160K free 1189152K cached :) Vahriç -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Trulsson Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 7:19 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: top -- and dual cpu quesitons ... On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 07:04:30PM +0200, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I'm using FreeBSD 4.9 . Does top utility have problem about showing > dual CPU output ... But I can see CPU0 AND CPU1 on STATE column When I > make something for example compiling something ... !?!! What were you expecting top(1) to show? If it shows both CPU0 and CPU1 in the STATE column, then SMP support seems to work as it is supposed to. I.e. I believe the problem is with your expectations rather than the system. -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: top -- and dual cpu quesitons ...
- Original Message - From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 11:04 AM Subject: top -- and dual cpu quesitons ... > Hi , > > I'm using FreeBSD 4.9 . Does top utility have problem about showing > dual CPU output ... But I can see CPU0 AND CPU1 on STATE column When I > make something for example compiling something ... !?!! > > > > > Vahric The column labeled C shows the cpu number currently being used for a particular process. PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND -- Micheal Patterson Network Administration TSG Incorporated 405-917-0600 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: top -- and dual cpu quesitons ...
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 07:04:30PM +0200, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I'm using FreeBSD 4.9 . Does top utility have problem about showing > dual CPU output ... But I can see CPU0 AND CPU1 on STATE column When I > make something for example compiling something ... !?!! What were you expecting top(1) to show? If it shows both CPU0 and CPU1 in the STATE column, then SMP support seems to work as it is supposed to. I.e. I believe the problem is with your expectations rather than the system. -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
top -- and dual cpu quesitons ...
Hi , I'm using FreeBSD 4.9 . Does top utility have problem about showing dual CPU output ... But I can see CPU0 AND CPU1 on STATE column When I make something for example compiling something ... !?!! Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SIGPIPE in popper
Hi everyone and Merry Christmas! I have the following problem: after moving cucipop popper daemon to FreeBSD 4.9 from 4.5, the popper often terminates with a SIGPIPE, even if the client resides on the same server. It never occured on FreeBSD 4.5. It seems as though the tcp connection breaks unexpectedly due to some reason at random times. Can you give me any hints how to solve this? Thanks a lot Alexander Varshavchick, Metrocom Joint Stock Company Phone: (812)118-3322, 118-3115(fax) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Ports usage question: semi-unattended mass upgrades
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:59:05PM +0100, Kai Grossjohann wrote: > The holy grail, of course, would be that I invoke some command which > asks me all questions and stores the answers somewhere, then invoke > another command which actually builds and installs the ports. I could > then do the question-answering in the evening, before I go to bed... It's called portupgrade(8) (sysutils/portupgrade in ports). Unlike portversion -c it will do the upgrades in the correct dependency order, which will leave you with a correctly working system. You can record any port options you use in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before you start your updating job, including options for interactive configuration (Hint: add 'BATCH=yes' to your make options to stop the interactive screens coming up). Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
Hi , I checked LINT it said that I have to disabke I386 AND I486 from kernel .. I marked those values from GENERIC and LINT too and recompile it . But I can't see any changes Then I checked my messages file Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: 2 CPUs Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 3, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io0 (APIC): apic id: 4, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: io1 (APIC): apic id: 5, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 Dec 25 20:30:33 freebsdcgp /kernel: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! And this is my sysctl out freebsdcgp# sysctl hw.ncpu hw.ncpu: 2 But when I run top utulity there is only one CPU there .. Now I will try cvsup RELENG_4 ... Maybe I can handle it ... Does anybody have advise ?! Vahriç ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fbsd_user Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 5:28 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... Answer to your ? 1. 98% of FBSD users do not have 2 cpu motherboards so default GENERIC kernel is configured for them and not for you. Answer to your ? 2. Read through the LINT kernel source to see if you missed some other kernel option needed to enable the kind of 2 cpu motherboard you have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vahric MUHTARYAN Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... Hi Everybody , I have two question about SMP . First Why FreeBSD is installing OS with single Cpu default ?!! Why it can't enable SMP support at installation time ?! Second when I compile kernel with SMP Support FreeBSD 4.9 can find second CPU ?! What do I have to check why it can't find it ?! I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it with DUAL INTEL 1.0B too Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How do I disable plip probing on 4.9 install?
Hi List, (and where/when appropriate, Seasons Greetings!): I'm having problems installing 4.9 release on a thinkpad 390x. I can get it to boot, but it stalls at this point: # ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic Chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE MODE plip0: on ppbus0 # and the machine just hangs, and hangs, for up to an hour before I just give in and turn it off. I've had OpenBSD, NetBSD, Linux, and Solaris on this machine w/o issues, but would really like to install 4.9 (the 5.x stuff does install, but is just too bloated to live with another OS on my hard drive.). All of the 4.x install Cd's/floppy's that I have (from 4.3 to 4.9) have this same problem. Can anyone let me know what the 'magic incantation' is for this, or point me in the proper direction? Thanks! Eric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem with ld-elf.so.1
What ever you do, upgrade portupgrade and its dependancies first. The current version will fix most bad situations that you would have had to delete packages and re-add them before. You may still have to do that because you have a corrupted setup. Many thanks I think it's improving! The origin of my problem could be in the g++ compiler because some portupgrade !reports mention "new compiler error". And Qt refuses to install arguing "system/compiler not supported" . It sounds strange since I run 4.9-release. My g++ version is 2.95.4 20020320 is it the latest ? How can I upgrade it or change the version? Thank you again for your answers to my questions. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cron jobs
shawn wrote: *snip* 1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a */1 * * * * /usr/local/bin/mrtg /usr/local/etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg Part of your problem is going to be right here. comparing two lines, you will notice the the 6th field is the user to run the program/script as. This differs from an individual crontab. add the proper username and give it a shot. Hit us up with another e-mail if problems persist. Hope this helps, happy holidays ~j -- Jonathan T. Sage Lighting & Scenic Design Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.theatre.msu.edu] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PGP: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cron jobs
/etc/crontab 86%# /etc/crontab - root's crontab for FreeBSD # # $FreeBSD: src/etc/crontab,v 1.21.2.3 2000/12/08 10:56:07 obrien Exp $ # SHELL=/bin/sh PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin HOME=/var/log # #minute hourmdaymonth wdaywho command # */1 * * * * root/usr/libexec/atrun # # rotate log files every hour, if necessary 0 * * * * rootnewsyslog # # do daily/weekly/monthly maintenance 1 3 * * * rootperiodic daily 15 4 * * 6 rootperiodic weekly 30 5 1 * * rootperiodic monthly # # time zone change adjustment for wall cmos clock, # does nothing, if you have UTC cmos clock. # See adjkerntz(8) for details. 1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a */1 * * * * /usr/local/bin/mrtg /usr/local/etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg - Original Message - From: "Jonathan T. Sage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "shawn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: Re: cron jobs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ports usage question: semi-unattended mass upgrades
Say I would like to upgrade all installed packages. I already found out that I can do "portversion -c" which spits out a shell script which does this. But since it takes a long time, so I'd like to let it run over night. It seems that it can ask me a question from time to time, if the port likes to ask questions. (Last time, I was lucky and only Postfix wanted to ask me. This question came fairly early.) How do I prevent having to get up in the middle of the night to answer a question from portupgrade? (Telling me to let the upgrade run over day rather than over night is not an acceptable answer ;-) The holy grail, of course, would be that I invoke some command which asks me all questions and stores the answers somewhere, then invoke another command which actually builds and installs the ports. I could then do the question-answering in the evening, before I go to bed... Kai ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
Answer to your ? 1. 98% of FBSD users do not have 2 cpu motherboards so default GENERIC kernel is configured for them and not for you. Answer to your ? 2. Read through the LINT kernel source to see if you missed some other kernel option needed to enable the kind of 2 cpu motherboard you have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vahric MUHTARYAN Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ... Hi Everybody , I have two question about SMP . First Why FreeBSD is installing OS with single Cpu default ?!! Why it can't enable SMP support at installation time ?! Second when I compile kernel with SMP Support FreeBSD 4.9 can find second CPU ?! What do I have to check why it can't find it ?! I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it with DUAL INTEL 1.0B too Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cron jobs
shawn wrote: I installed MRTG and got it working. Noticed that it seemed it was not polling on its own. So I changed the cron job to make it poll more often and in fact its not polling on its own. Also noticed that I stopped receiving my Dailey, reports via email.. I'm also trouble shooting a send mail issue though so that don't really surprise me. I did sh /etc/crontab and got this /etc/crontab: */1: not found /etc/crontab: */1: not found 0: not found 1: not found 15: not found 30: not found 1,31: not found I thought it looked funny so I looked at Logs ... skywalker /usr/sbin/cron[41045]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) skywalker /usr/sbin/cron[41051]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41056]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41066]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41070]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41074]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41094]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41109]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41115]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41127]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Nothing looked odd to me.. Any thoughts? can you resend this question and include the contents of /etc/crontab as well? ~j -- Jonathan T. Sage Lighting & Scenic Design Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.theatre.msu.edu] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PGP: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
FreeBSD 4.9 Can't find second CPU ...
Hi Everybody , I have two question about SMP . First Why FreeBSD is installing OS with single Cpu default ?!! Why it can't enable SMP support at installation time ?! Second when I compile kernel with SMP Support FreeBSD 4.9 can find second CPU ?! What do I have to check why it can't find it ?! I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it with DUAL INTEL 1.0B too Vahric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I can't install FreeBSD5.0 or FreeBSD5.1R on Dual Computer ....
Hi Everybody , I can't install FreeBSD on my Dual Computer .. When I boot the computer for install FreeBSD from 5.0 CD it stopped on TimeCounter "ACPI-SAFE" frequency 3579545 line ... After That I try to install from 5.1 CD it stopped on same line ... But I can install FreeBSD 4.9 without problem I'm using DUAL PIII 933 CPU and INTEL Server BOARD I tested it with DUAL INTEL 1.0B too Thanks ... Vahric MUHTARYAN ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Visual mail notification in KMail
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 12:47, Chris wrote: > Happy Holidays folks! > > Is there a way to tie in a visual mail notifier in KMail? Sorta like how > Outlook shows the envelope under Windows. > KMail can only notify if it is running. I run fetchmail in daemon mode to transfer any POP mail from my ISP into the statndard mailbox /var/mail/'username'. A number of desktop applications are available to give visual indication of new mail in the mailbox such as xbiff or xmailbox; I use the latter. When the mail icon indicates mail present I can call kmail; which is setup to read from the mailbox; and process it. Malcolm Kay ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Unprobed PCI bus on VXPro II chipset
Thanks very much for the suggestion! Unfortunately it didn't make any difference at all to the probe. Any other suggestions? Anyone else? Sean -Original Message- From: fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Dec 24, 2003 3:14 PM To: Sean Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Unprobed PCI bus on VXPro II chipset You did not have to do all that hacking, there is an simple fix for old bio's and PCI cards. Add device puc to your kernel source and recompile. Your next boot review your boot log and you should see all the PCI devices found except sound cards. You have to add device pcm to your kernel and recompile to find PCI sound cards or built on the motherboard sound. I know this works for the 4.x releases including 4.9. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Welch Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unprobed PCI bus on VXPro II chipset As I'm not quite sure where I should be asking for help with this I figured I'd try shooting the info over to freebsd-hackers (as it seemed the closest match) and to freebsd-questions (as there seems to be a requirement to join the list for hackers mail). I've got an oldish machine (EDO RAM and such) running a VXPro II chipset. I have successfully configured FreeBSD from 2.2.8 up to 5-CURRENT to run on this thing but I've never managed to get it to probe and attach anything on the PCI bus. Here's what I've found and what I've tried. I believe the motherboard was sold as PCChips kit. Looking up the stats I find that it was a rebrand of Hint Co. hardware. The PCI IDs are actually listed in /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors and look like this: 3388Hint Corp. 0020HB6 UNIVERSAL PCI-PCI BRIDGE 0021HB1-SE33 PCI-to-PCI Bridge 8011VXPro II Chipset CPU to PCI Bridge 8012VXPro II Chipset PCI to ISA Bridge 8013VXPro II Chipset EIDE Controller I found a commit notice online to the linux kernel that contained these same IDs so it looks like the complete string should be "33880020", "33880021", etc. I also managed to find this message from *long* ago: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm= Pine.BSF.3.96.990120135600.28221A-10_gate1.ilhadamagia.com.br%40 ns.sol.net&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3 DUTF-8%26q%3Dfreebsd%2Bvxpro%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch I'm currently running 4.9-RELEASE. The uname -a output is: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #5: Tue Oct 14 11:51:28 CDT 2003 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/WARPPHYS i386 Poking around I discovered that pcibus.c no longer contains the code referenced in the above message (but that didn't stop me). I found it instead in pci_cfgreg.c and tried adding the explicit set of oldval1 to zero but no joy. I ended up adding the PCI IDs to both /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/pcibus.c and also /usr/src/sys/pci/pcisupport.c in the effort to get the chipset recognized. No go. When I boot verbose this is all I can get about the PCI bus: pci_open(1):mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0xff00 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x (0x8000) pci_open(1b): mode1res=0x7020 (0xff01) pci_open(2):mode 2 enable port (0x0cf8) is 0xff Infuriatingly, the BIOS sees everything on the bus and labels the devices with reasonable categories. Likewise, scanpci (comes with XFree86) identifies the chipsets and the devices without any trouble at all -- that at least explains why I've never had any trouble using the PCI video card under X. The output of scanpci identifies the last three chipsets from that snipet I put above (from pci_vendors) with the last being labeled as IDE rather than EIDE (which is correct). Based on this digging around I'm convinced that there must be some ugly hack that is posible to get FreeBSD to probe and attach the bus and devices on it. I've only got this desktop and while I've been able to live without the PCI USB card, I need to test out a PCI WinTV card. The whole machine is old enough that isn't feasible to just try swapping out the motherboard (the case isn't even ATX compatible) and I've not got the money to just buy something else. Would anyone be willing to help me get this sorted out? I'm out of my depth here but to my inexperienced eyes this doesn't look to be an insurmountable issue. Sean ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Packages with older dependencies
I'm attempting to install gaim-0.73 on my 5.2 RC-1 system. However, it's got some older dependency requirements such as: desk# pkg_add -r gaim Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/Latest/gaim.tbz... Done. Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/All/libao-0.8.4_1.tbz... Done. Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/All/gtkspell2-2.0.4.tbz... Done. pkg_add: warning: package 'gtkspell2-2.0.4' requires 'png-1.2.5_2', but 'png-1.2.5_3' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gtkspell2-2.0.4' requires 'tiff-3.6.0', but 'tiff-3.6.0_1' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gtkspell2-2.0.4' requires 'imake-4.3.0_1', but 'imake-4.3.0_2' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gaim-0.73' requires 'png-1.2.5_2', but 'png-1.2.5_3' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gaim-0.73' requires 'libaudiofile-0.2.4', but 'libaudiofile-0.2.5' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gaim-0.73' requires 'tiff-3.6.0', but 'tiff-3.6.0_1' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'gaim-0.73' requires 'imake-4.3.0_1', but 'imake-4.3.0_2' is installed I assume i can force the install with the -f flag, but I wanted to know if there are any ramifications to doing this on future updates or to future program installs? What is the easiest way to install gaim (or any program for that matter) when a situation such as this arises? What would have happened if I attemted the install via ports instead? Thanks and Happy Holidays! -- Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Visual mail notification in KMail
On Thursday 25 December 2003 03:18 am, Shantanoo Mahajan wrote: > +++ Chris [freebsd] [24-12-03 20:17 -0600]: > | Happy Holidays folks! > | > | Is there a way to tie in a visual mail notifier in KMail? Sorta like how > | Outlook shows the envelope under Windows. Open KMail, Settings, Configure Notifications. -- Thanks, Charles http://howse.homeunix.net:8080 Random Murphy's Law: Don't force it, get a bigger hammer. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cron jobs
I installed MRTG and got it working. Noticed that it seemed it was not polling on its own. So I changed the cron job to make it poll more often and in fact its not polling on its own. Also noticed that I stopped receiving my Dailey, reports via email.. I'm also trouble shooting a send mail issue though so that don't really surprise me. I did sh /etc/crontab and got this /etc/crontab: */1: not found /etc/crontab: */1: not found 0: not found 1: not found 15: not found 30: not found 1,31: not found I thought it looked funny so I looked at Logs ... skywalker /usr/sbin/cron[41045]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) skywalker /usr/sbin/cron[41051]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41056]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41066]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41070]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41074]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41094]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41109]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41115]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) /usr/sbin/cron[41127]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Nothing looked odd to me.. Any thoughts? There is no place like 127.0.0.1 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: identd in jailed 4.9-STABLE
Hello, you seem to not have tried this under 4.9 or not under jail. In the host environment I haven't run anything else but sshd which is bound to listen on the IP != jail environment. In the jail environment it's not possible to bind on IP outside the jail. After googling a little I found that this is because identd uses tcp_getcred() which won't leak information to jail environment. There were a patch for 4.3 which made identd work but the patch won't work on 4.9-STABLE. If someone made identd work in jailed environment, please explain how. thanks On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 01:28:12AM +0200, Alexander wrote: > > > did someone make identd work on 4.9-STABLE in jailed environment ? > > Don't see why it should cause any particular difficulties. You'll > need to run an instance of inetd(8) in each jail where you want ident > capability. All of those inetd(8)'s and any inetd(8) from the base > system should be bound to specific IP addresses by using the '-a' > option -- otherwise they all attempt to bind to INADDR_ANY and end up > fighting each other. > > Eg: if your machine uses 192.168.0.1 as it's principal IP and has an > alias address of 192.168.0.2 used by a jail, and you want inetd > services in both, you would put: > > inetd_enable="YES" > inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.1" > > in /etc/rc.conf on the host environment, and: > > inetd_enable="YES" > inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.2" > > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Visual mail notification in KMail
+++ Chris [freebsd] [24-12-03 20:17 -0600]: | Happy Holidays folks! | | Is there a way to tie in a visual mail notifier in KMail? Sorta like how | Outlook shows the envelope under Windows. | | Thanks in advance, stay safe, semi-sober and enjoy the holidays. | -- | Best regards, | | Chris maybe xbiff. Shantanoo | | | -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
need learning direction suggestions on using editors
Hello. I have been using the vi that comes with FreeBSD for more than a year. I now can manage to use lots of vi features except the tag mode which I don't know clear about its concept (perhaps because of my bad English). Now I think vi is not sufficient. I hate to type "!perl %" each time I edit and re-try my perl script, and I'd like to load related files quickly. (say load a included php file when I see it is being included.) Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe none? Maybe many? I know very few about editors other than vi, if I'm going to learn another editor now, I wish I can be using that forever, and I wish the editor have good L10N (esp. Chinese). I do some Java program, php and perl program but not C, and I'd likely to do these kind of program in the coming years, so what is the best editor for my kind? I'd like the editor's style to be accepted by readline so I can use commandline and editor in the same way. Thank you! _ 享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统― MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: identd in jailed 4.9-STABLE
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 01:28:12AM +0200, Alexander wrote: > did someone make identd work on 4.9-STABLE in jailed environment ? Don't see why it should cause any particular difficulties. You'll need to run an instance of inetd(8) in each jail where you want ident capability. All of those inetd(8)'s and any inetd(8) from the base system should be bound to specific IP addresses by using the '-a' option -- otherwise they all attempt to bind to INADDR_ANY and end up fighting each other. Eg: if your machine uses 192.168.0.1 as it's principal IP and has an alias address of 192.168.0.2 used by a jail, and you want inetd services in both, you would put: inetd_enable="YES" inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.1" in /etc/rc.conf on the host environment, and: inetd_enable="YES" inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.2" Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Using maildrop from sendmail aliases file
I am attempting to configure sendmail to pass mail addressed to a particular domain to maildrop. maildrop is already installed and used with getmail to collect mail from a number of pop accounts. It has been installed as user:vmail group:vmail. This existing setup works fine. I've added the following to the sendmail configuration: in /etc/mail/virtusertable ... @second.domain.tldsecond-domain-tld and in /etc/mail/aliases ... second-domain-tld:"| /usr/local/bin/maildrop -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]" It looks as though it's ready to work except for this in /var/log/maillog: ... Dec 25 17:05:19 maildrop[75657]: Cannot set my user or group id. Presumably this is because maildrop wants to set itself to run as user:vmail and the existing setup I have works as-is because getmail (which calls maildrop) is configured to run as user:vmail in /etc/crontab. Either I need to find a way to allow maildrop to change itself to user:vmail when called from sendmail (which I don't know how to achieve) or I need to change maildrop to run as (I'm guessing) user:root which if memory serves was something that was suggested to be avoided. What would be the best approach? Thanks, Wayne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
