Re: WindowsCE Device (iPAQ) and FreeBSD

2004-04-25 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Monday 26 April 2004 00:13, Ralph M. Los wrote:
> Are there any "drivers" or connectors to be able to "talk" (synch, etc)
> to a WinCE device for FreeBSD?

Yes, there is:


$ cd /usr/ports
$ make search name=synce

Antoine
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


5.2.1 Release and fonts in Gnome vs. KDE

2004-04-25 Thread Matt Anderson
Hello again!

KDE and Gnome both installed out of the packages on the CD.

Fonts look great in Gnome and crappy in KDE.  Even KDE apps like kmail look 
good in Gnome.

I've not seen this sort of stuff in any linux distro.  Any ideas?

Matt Anderson

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Problem logging in to the NIS slave and NIS Client

2004-04-25 Thread Jamel Brown
freebsd1.compulinux.org 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386

freebsd2.compulinux.org 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386

freebsd3.compulinux.org 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386

freebsd4.compulinux.org 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386 

I'm having several problems setting up NIS on my
system I have 4 computers that I am trying to setup
NIS on. The roles I would like my computers to play
are as follows Freebsd1 Server, Freebsd2 Slave,
Freebsd3 Client, and Freebsd4 Client. I have been
trying to set up NIS according to what the FreeBSD
handbook says several times but all with no luck. Ok
here's is another thing I’m new to FreeBSD so I don’t
know how to use vipw very well so I always use add
user instead please let me know if I am causing the
problem by not using these programs. Also if you
notice I have missed anything please let me know. Also
Please Type in the exact command needed to fix my
problem if at all possible as I have stated before I
am new to FreeBSD so please assume I might not know.


This is /etc/group on freebsd1
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/group,v 1.19.2.3 2002/06/30
17:57:17 des Exp $
#
wheel:*:0:root
daemon:*:1:daemon
kmem:*:2:root
sys:*:3:root
tty:*:4:root
operator:*:5:root
mail:*:6:
bin:*:7:
news:*:8:
man:*:9:
games:*:13:
staff:*:20:root
sshd:*:22:
smmsp:*:25:
mailnull:*:26:
guest:*:31:root
bind:*:53:
uucp:*:66:
xten:*:67:xten
dialer:*:68:
network:*:69:
www:*:80:
nogroup:*:65533:
nobody:*:65534:
+:*::

This is /etc/group on freebsd2
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/group,v 1.19.2.3 2002/06/30
17:57:17 des Exp $
#
wheel:*:0:root
daemon:*:1:daemon
kmem:*:2:root
sys:*:3:root
tty:*:4:root
operator:*:5:root
mail:*:6:
bin:*:7:
news:*:8:
man:*:9:
games:*:13:
staff:*:20:root
sshd:*:22:
smmsp:*:25:
mailnull:*:26:
guest:*:31:root
bind:*:53:
uucp:*:66:
xten:*:67:xten
dialer:*:68:
network:*:69:
www:*:80:
nogroup:*:65533:
nobody:*:65534:
+:*::

This is /etc/group on freebsd3
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/group,v 1.19.2.3 2002/06/30
17:57:17 des Exp $
#
wheel:*:0:root
daemon:*:1:daemon
kmem:*:2:root
sys:*:3:root
tty:*:4:root
operator:*:5:root
mail:*:6:
bin:*:7:
news:*:8:
man:*:9:
games:*:13:
staff:*:20:root
sshd:*:22:
smmsp:*:25:
mailnull:*:26:
guest:*:31:root
bind:*:53:
uucp:*:66:
xten:*:67:xten
dialer:*:68:
network:*:69:
www:*:80:
nogroup:*:65533:
nobody:*:65534:
pgsql:*:70:
+:*::

This is /etc/group on freebsd4
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/group,v 1.19.2.3 2002/06/30
17:57:17 des Exp $
#
wheel:*:0:root
daemon:*:1:daemon
kmem:*:2:root
sys:*:3:root
tty:*:4:root
operator:*:5:root
mail:*:6:
bin:*:7:
news:*:8:
man:*:9:
games:*:13:
staff:*:20:root
sshd:*:22:
smmsp:*:25:
mailnull:*:26:
guest:*:31:root
bind:*:53:
uucp:*:66:
xten:*:67:xten
dialer:*:68:
network:*:69:
www:*:80:
nogroup:*:65533:
nobody:*:65534:
+:*::

This is /etc/host.conf on all hosts

# First try the /etc/hosts file
hosts
# Now try the nameserver next.
bind
# If you have YP/NIS configured, uncomment the next
line
nis

this is how /etc/hosts is listed on all hosts

::1 localhost localhost.compulinux.org
127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.compulinux.org
192.168.123.1   freebsd1.compulinux.org freebsd1
192.168.123.2   freebsd2.compulinux.org freebsd2
192.168.123.3   freebsd3.compulinux.org freebsd3
192.168.123.4   freebsd4.compulinux.org freebsd4
192.168.123.5   freebsd5.compulinux.org freebsd5
192.168.123.6   winxpcorp1.compulinux.org   winxpcorp1
192.168.123.7   winxpcorp2.compulinux.org   winxpcorp2
192.168.123.8   hpnotebook.compulinux.org   hpnotebook
+::

this is /etc/master.passwd on freebsd1
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/master.passwd,v 1.25.2.6
2002/06/30 17:57:17 des Exp $
#
root:$1$JXm8MlGX$HehcsfGmwYiOg1C337o5x/:0:0::0:0:Charlie
&:/root:/bin/csh
toor:*:0:0::0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
daemon:*:1:1::0:0:Owner of many system
processes:/root:/sbin/nologin
operator:*:2:5::0:0:System &:/:/sbin/nologin
bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and
Source:/:/sbin/nologin
tty:*:4:65533::0:0:Tty Sandbox:/:/sbin/nologin
kmem:*:5:65533::0:0:KMem Sandbox:/:/sbin/nologin
games:*:7:13::0:0:Games
pseudo-user:/usr/games:/sbin/nologin
news:*:8:8::0:0:News Subsystem:/:/sbin/nologin
man:*:9:9::0:0:Mister Man
Pages:/usr/share/man:/sbin/nologin
sshd:*:22:22::0:0:Secure Shell
Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin
smmsp:*:25:25::0:0:Sendmail Submission
User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin
mailnull:*:26:26::0:0:Sendmail Default
User:/var/spool/mqueue:/sbin/nologin
bind:*:53:53::0:0:Bind Sandbox:/:/sbin/nologin
uucp:*:66:66::0:0:UUCP
pseudo-user:/var/spool/uucppublic:/usr/libexec/uucp/uucicoxten:*:67:67::0:0:X-10
daem

Regarding "Problems with 5.2.1 Release"

2004-04-25 Thread Matt Anderson
Hello again everyone!

Thanks to all that responded.  

Here is where it stands.

1.  The bootmanager issue is still an issue but I can work around it.

2.  As for the sound card.  I tried the kldload snd_driver and it forced a 
reboot of my machine.  Ah...  Ok.  I remembered that I had turned off "Plug N 
Play OS" in my BIOS.  I turned that back on and rebooted.  kldload snd_driver 
then ran just fine.  But, no sound in KDE or Gnome.

I'm trying the custom kernal again now.  The other thing I should mention is 
that this computer has a funky internal modem with built in sound AND a 
soundblaster type card.  

I think that may be confusing things.  As I'm networked and my iMac is the one 
actually dialing out, I think I'll just remove the modem from this machine 
and see where it goes from there.

Thanks again!

Matt Anderson

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


WindowsCE Device (iPAQ) and FreeBSD

2004-04-25 Thread Ralph M. Los
Are there any "drivers" or connectors to be able to "talk" (synch, etc)
to a WinCE device for FreeBSD?

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  Ralph | Internet Systems & Security   +
+   Boundariez.com   | -"Specializing in Paranoia"-  +
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  ralph[!at]boundariez[dot!]com |  Never understimate the power +
+AIM: SekurityWizard | stupid people +
+ICQ: 2206039|in large groups+
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Palm Zire syncing woes

2004-04-25 Thread Dave
Ok, after about an hour of Googling and following several sets of
directions, I've not yet been able to sync my Palm Zire.  Does anyone
have any pointers or suggestions?

Realivent information:

Using 5.2.1-RELEASE

ucom and uvisor compiled into kernel

/etc/usbd.conf
..snip..
device "Palm Zire"
devname "ugen[0-9]+"
vendor  0x0830
product 0x0070
release 0x0100
..snip..

/dev/ucom0 appears when I hit the HotSync button, thanks to devfs

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


mouse problems using xdm

2004-04-25 Thread Gary Kline

I have gnome and KDE both set up on my z5.2 box, and have
managed to tune the mouse to work (reasonably) well.  I
bring up gnome with startx; KDE with kdm.  However, if I
try to login to /home/admin wth xdm, the mouse acts strange.
It jerks, moves slowly, then rapidly.  

My admin login uses ctwm, which I've grown used to; ctwm
assumes some inteligence of the user while the others seem
too GUI orientated.   So:: any X11/wm wizards out there 
know what might be happening?  Is there a 'default' mouse
settting for gnome/kde? and how do I get backto it?

thanks for any clues,

gary



-- 
   Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org Public service Unix

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Supporting backup batteries over serial port?

2004-04-25 Thread Miles Lubin
>1. Backup (PowerChute-like app, from Belkin?) --> don't know of any
>alternative in FreeBSD

I have an F6C120-UNV UPS from Belkin, and on the website it has "Linux
Bulldog v3.01.12" at
http://web.belkin.com/support/download/downloaddetails.asp?download=824&lang=1

This works fine for me.

Note - im connecting by network to the ups, not sure how well it manages
the serial port.

Miles
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ClamAV 0.67, SendMail, FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1

2004-04-25 Thread Ed Budd
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:42:27 +0200
Jakub Lida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sorry for bothering, but I assume that I have to recompile 
> /usr/src/contrib/sendmail with milter support, don't I? Should I
> define MILTER in conf.h (in sendmail sources)?
> Or you don't mention milter support in sendmail because it is compiled
> in by default, hey? ;)
> 

Bingo! But just to be sure, type this as root:

sendmail -bt -d0.1

If you see MILTER listed in the "compiled with" area you're good to
go...at least as far as milter is concerned.

EB
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ClamAV 0.67, SendMail, FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1

2004-04-25 Thread Jakub Lida
Sorry for bothering, but I assume that I have to recompile 
/usr/src/contrib/sendmail with milter support, don't I? Should I define 
MILTER in conf.h (in sendmail sources)?
Or you don't mention milter support in sendmail because it is compiled 
in by default, hey? ;)

Thanks a lot!

Jakub Lida.

--
/*
*  Jakub Lida
*  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*  IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: comparison to solaris9

2004-04-25 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-25 12:56]:

> >I had never seen the nickname 'Slowlaris' before that, but I came to
> >appreciate it ;)
> 
> Solaris advocates used to say that it was slow on uniprocessor systems. 
>  I think freebsd 5.2.1 through that out the window.  (because of SMP 
> kernels)
> 
> I haven't used solaris 9 x86, but i have seen *bsd vs solaris 7 and 8 
> on x86 hardware.  Solaris is a tad bit slow.  In fact, its not just 
> ia32 hardware.  I had an old sparc that came with solaris and i put 
> NetBSD on it.  NetBSD was easily twice as fast.  (not sparc64)  It was 

I have had the same experience there, too, with an SS5.  It runs Solaris
*very* slowly, but with NetBSD (which it's running now) it's a nice
little desktop machine (if only I could get X to display in more than
8-bit color depth.) 

-- 
Joshua

"Don't worry; your wife's virtue will remain as
 untouched as Bill Gates' weight room!"
   -- Artie Ziff

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: comparison to solaris9

2004-04-25 Thread Lucas Holt
First, I am not an expert.  Second, I have little Solaris experience.  
I
have,however, run FreeBSD 5.2.1 and solaris9 x86 on the same hardware.
I had never seen the nickname 'Slowlaris' before that, but I came to
appreciate it ;)
Solaris advocates used to say that it was slow on uniprocessor systems. 
 I think freebsd 5.2.1 through that out the window.  (because of SMP 
kernels)

I haven't used solaris 9 x86, but i have seen *bsd vs solaris 7 and 8 
on x86 hardware.  Solaris is a tad bit slow.  In fact, its not just 
ia32 hardware.  I had an old sparc that came with solaris and i put 
NetBSD on it.  NetBSD was easily twice as fast.  (not sparc64)  It was 
a sun sparcstation IPC.  (25mhz)  The only advantage to using solaris 
is you don't have to go through all the hoops to get a native jdk.  :)

Lucas Holt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FoolishGames.com  (Jewel Fan Site)
JustJournal.com (Free blogging)
'I try to think but nothing happens'
-- Homer Jay Simpson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: -CURRENT: Buildkernel dies building linprocfs

2004-04-25 Thread Michael L. Squires
> linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_doversion':
> /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:464: undefined reference to `linux_get
> _osname'
> /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:465: undefined reference to `linux_get
> _osrelease'
> linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_donetdev':
> /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:920: undefined reference to `linux_ifn
> ame'
> linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_init':
> /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:1013: undefined reference to `procfs_d
> ocurproc'

I'm wondering if you've got enough of the source to compile LINUX emulation.

I just compiled 5.2-CURRENT for two machines, one with SMP and Linux emulation,
no problems.  My CVS update is from April 24-25, about midnight.

I do have the entire source tree updated via CVS, which avoids a number of
problems that occur if you update only part of the tree.

MLS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Upgrading a port....

2004-04-25 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Ralph M. Los <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-25 10:14]:
> Hi,
>   I currently have Samba 2.2.8a running.  I'd like to get up to
> the 3.0.x.x version, as I've heard there are significant advances in
> that version.  Can someone tell me if I do a 'make install' from the
> /usr/ports/net/samba-devel directory if it'll "upgrade" my current Samba
> 2.2.8a to 3.x.x.x?  If not, what will happen?  Also, how would I go
> about upgrading in that case?
 
Samba 2.2.8 and 3.x are separate; similar to FreeBSD4.x and 5.x, I
suppose.  You definitely want to check out portupgrade if you're wanting
to maintain software from the ports collection, but I'm afraid a

# portupgrade samba-2.2.8

will not get you the desired results.  Now, I
don't know if they're mutually exclusive, but you may want to install
Samba 3.x on another machine to test it first.  I use it here at home,
and yes the 3.x branch does introduce alot of functionality not found in
2.2.8.

-- 
Joshua

"Lousy, loveable dog." -- Homer Simpson

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: comparison to solaris9

2004-04-25 Thread Joshua Lokken
* J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-25 05:51]:
> Has anyone made any comparisons of performance  of 5.2.1 and solaris9 x86 
> on the same gear?
 
First, I am not an expert.  Second, I have little Solaris experience.  I
have,however, run FreeBSD 5.2.1 and solaris9 x86 on the same hardware.
I had never seen the nickname 'Slowlaris' before that, but I came to
appreciate it ;)

-- 
Joshua

"...and *no* funny stuff; and by funny stuff I mean,
 handholding, goo-goo eyes, misdirected woo
 (which is pretty much any John Wu film...)"
   -- Homer Simpson

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Supporting backup batteries over serial port?

2004-04-25 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Ralph M. Los wrote:

Hi,
I'm thinking of converting the last of my servers (Win2k) to
FreeBSD.  This last box has the following things, and I want to make
sure I can get the equivalent in FreeBSD.  Could someone give me
suggestions on the stuff I can't find info on?
 

This is a long list, so you've a good bit of work to do.
Generally, it can all be done.  I must say I've not much
experience with some of the below, though.
1. Backup (PowerChute-like app, from Belkin?) --> don't know of any
alternative in FreeBSD
 

There are a couple.  nut, upsmon, and upsd are all under
/usr/ports/sysutils.  I set nut up a while back, but my UPS
battery died before I got it working (here at home) and I've
not yet replaced it.  (After a recent round with fsck, I've
found I need to make that a higher priority...)
2. Exchange 2000 --> Qmail + SquirrelMail + clamAV + SpamAssassin ??
(How hard is this to setup?)
 

Can't say.  Sendmail dual + SpamAssassin/clamAV/amavis here.

3. Split-DNS server (internal and external) --> Is there a how-to on
BIND for this?
 

Probably.  Google is your friend, of course; also, there is a list of
additional references in the handbook, 19.10.10 (which, as you have
noticed, tells a lot about running BIND but not necessarily[?] about
split DNS...
4. PDC --> Assuming SAMBA can do this?  White-Paper, or how-to?
 

Yup.  Check www.samba.org for docs...

5. Backup Server (BackupExec v9.1) --> Arkeia backup solution?
(Freeware?) or comp??
 

There's a bit of talk about "bacula" --- I'm looking into it
soon.
THANKS everyone, 3 down, one to go!

|Ralph
 

Good luck!

Kevin Kinsey
DaleCo, S.P.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problems with 5.2.1 Release

2004-04-25 Thread Shantanoo
+++ Matt Anderson [freebsd] [24-04-04 20:50 -0700]:
| Hello everyone,
| 
| I've got an older computer.  PIII 450.  Riva TNT 2 video.  Plenty of
| RAM.
| 
| Couple of issues.  First, let me say that I've been using FreeBSD off
| and on since version 3.
| 
| 2.  I WAS having a problem with the machine freezing every time I
| started X.  I read in the erata about the ACIP problems and got around
| that.  However, when I created a "custom" kernel, and all I did was add
| the pcm driver so I could have sound, the machine freezes on boot while
| accessing the ethernet card.  3Com card that works fine with the Generic
| kernel.  That has me completely stumped.

remove 'device pcm'
instead try

kldload snd_driver

| 
| Any help would be greatly appreciated.  I did not have the same sort of
| problems with this machine with 5.1 release or any of the 4.x series.
| 
| Thanks!
| 
| Matt Anderson
| 
| 
| 
| --
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:37:36 +0800 (CST), Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

I'm expecting a reply from Joshua or other folks to my
posting whether I can stop running 'make clean' the
ports trees in the mid-way.  In doing so it won't
damage the OS.  After clarification I shall install
'automake' first. then install/upgrade to
'ORBit-0.5.17_2' and then install OOo 1.1.1
You should be able to stop the 'make clean' with no ill effects.  If you 
=really= want to clean your whole ports tree, run:

make -DNOCLEANDEPENDS clean

in the /usr/ports directory.  It should go about a thousand times faster.

--
Danny
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FTP Program

2004-04-25 Thread lists
Gerard Seibert wrote:

I am currently using WS_FTP Pro version 8.03 on my WinXP Pro machine. I
was wondering if anyone could recommend a similar type FTP program for
FreeBSD. I really like the ease of use, scheduling capabilities, etc. of
WS_FTP and would therefore like to find a similar product for use on
FreeBSD.
Thanks!

Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 

Hello Gerard,

I have been using axyftp for a while with no problems.

Port: axyftp-0.5.1_1
Path: /usr/ports/ftp/axyftp/
Info: X Window System FTP client, with WSftp-like UI
Thanatos
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


How to mount a Firewire disk ?

2004-04-25 Thread EuropeanServers - Christophe BAEGERT
Hello,

I'm new to FreeBSD.

I set up a FreeBSD-4.9 backup server on a Epia mainboard with 4 HD of 120 gigs, and 
want to add an external backup
of 120Gb. Of course, I need firewire to have acceptable speeds. The VT6303 chipset is 
detected, but I don't see da0.

This is what I see in the logs : 

Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0:  port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 
0xe640-0xe64007ff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1)
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channel is 4.
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:63:50:00:00:82:f1
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports.
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes.
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: firewire0:  on fwohci0
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: if_fwe0:  on firewire0
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:40:63:00:82:f1
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: Initiate bus reset
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: BUS reset
Apr 22 13:22:46 gattaca /kernel: fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode
Apr 22 13:23:58 gattaca /kernel: WARNING: driver fw should register devices with 
make_dev() (dev_t = "#fw/0")

This is my kldstat :
gattaca# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 14 0xc010 43d918   kernel
 22 0xc23d1000 12000firewire.ko
 31 0xc23e7000 8000 sbp.ko
 41 0xc3b08000 6000 umass.ko

I tried "kldload da", but it fails with :
kldload: can't load da: No such file or directory

Idem with scbus

gattaca# fdisk da0
fdisk: cannot open disk /dev/da0: Device not configured


-- 
Christophe BAEGERT  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> http://www.europeanservers.net <
--- Ultra fast internet servers --
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Upgrading a port....

2004-04-25 Thread Lewis Thompson
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:03:52PM -0400, Ralph M. Los wrote:
>   I currently have Samba 2.2.8a running.  I'd like to get up to
> the 3.0.x.x version, as I've heard there are significant advances in
> that version.  Can someone tell me if I do a 'make install' from the
> /usr/ports/net/samba-devel directory if it'll "upgrade" my current
> Samba 2.2.8a to 3.x.x.x?  If not, what will happen?  Also, how would I
> go about upgrading in that case?

No, that won't work.  Look at sysutils/portupgrade.

-lewiz.

-- 
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.  --Bob Dylan, 1964.

-| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Upgrading a port....

2004-04-25 Thread Ralph M. Los
Hi,
I currently have Samba 2.2.8a running.  I'd like to get up to
the 3.0.x.x version, as I've heard there are significant advances in
that version.  Can someone tell me if I do a 'make install' from the
/usr/ports/net/samba-devel directory if it'll "upgrade" my current Samba
2.2.8a to 3.x.x.x?  If not, what will happen?  Also, how would I go
about upgrading in that case?

Thanks,

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  Ralph | Internet Systems & Security   +
+   Boundariez.com   | -"Specializing in Paranoia"-  +
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  ralph[!at]boundariez[dot!]com |  Never understimate the power +
+AIM: SekurityWizard | stupid people +
+ICQ: 2206039|in large groups+
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mirroring: cvsup vs. rsync

2004-04-25 Thread Tim McMillen
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 03:57, David Fleck wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a mirror of a CVS repository at a remote site.  The
> repository has 1000's of fairly small files, and is about 75MB in total
> size.
> 
> This seemed like an obvious job for CVSup, so I got a recent version
> (16.1h) of the sources, built and installed on 2 Red Hat machines, one
> local and one remote, set up the server directories and files, and wrote a
> supfile for the client.  It seems to work ok.
> 
> The thing that surprises me is that I also tried mirroring the same
> repository with rsync (using the -az options), and rsync is *much* faster,
> so far the speed increases for rsync are on the order of 5X.
> This makes me wonder if I'm using CVSup right.

Well I'm not sure if you are, I don't know the bowels of cvsup, but I do
know rsync is a much more efficient protocol.  5x seems a little
excessive, but not that surprising I guess.

to the point that I'm not sure why rsync is not the preferred way of
updating ports and src trees.

Tim
-- 
Wikipeda, a free and open content encyclopedia
http://www.wikipedia.org

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mirroring: cvsup vs. rsync

2004-04-25 Thread Tim McMillen
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 03:57, David Fleck wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a mirror of a CVS repository at a remote site.  The
> repository has 1000's of fairly small files, and is about 75MB in total
> size.
> 
> This seemed like an obvious job for CVSup, so I got a recent version
> (16.1h) of the sources, built and installed on 2 Red Hat machines, one
> local and one remote, set up the server directories and files, and wrote a
> supfile for the client.  It seems to work ok.
> 
> The thing that surprises me is that I also tried mirroring the same
> repository with rsync (using the -az options), and rsync is *much* faster,
> so far the speed increases for rsync are on the order of 5X.
> This makes me wonder if I'm using CVSup right.

Well I'm not sure if you are, I don't know the bowels of cvsup, but I do
know rsync is a much more efficient protocol.  5x seems a little
excessive, but not that surprising I guess.

to the point that I'm not sure why rsync is not the preferred way of
updating ports and src trees.

Tim
-- 
Wikipeda, a free and open content encyclopedia
http://www.wikipedia.org

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Installation of gcc34

2004-04-25 Thread Gerard Seibert
I have been unable to install gcc version 3.4 on my system. The last few
lines of output are as follows:


../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function
`fibheap_union':
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c:166: warning: implicit
declaration of function `free'
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function
`fibheap_delete_node':
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: `LONG_MIN'
undeclared (first use in this function)
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is reported only once
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c:285: error: for each
function it appears in.)
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function
`fibheap_consolidate':
../.././..//gcc-3.4-20040414/libiberty/fibheap.c:395: warning: implicit
declaration of function `memset'
gmake[2]: *** [fibheap.o] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1/libiberty'
gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libiberty] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build'
gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc34.


The entire file may be view here: http://www.seibercom.us/BSD/nohup.out

If anyone has any suggestions, I would appreciate hearing them. I am
running FreeBSD 5.2.1.

Thanks!

Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


fwbuilder - broken port?

2004-04-25 Thread Robert Storey
Hmmm...strange happenings here...

I tried installing fwbuilder (a tool for building firewalls - works with
ipfilter and pf) from ports. This is the first time I've seen this sort of
error...

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/security/fwbuilder> make
  >> fwbuilder-1.0.11.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
  >> Attempting to fetch from http://us.dl.sourceforge.net/fwbuilder/.
  Receiving fwbuilder-1.0.11.tar.gz (1385279 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00)  
  1385279 bytes transferred in 309.8 seconds (4.37 kBps)
  ===>  Extracting for fwbuilder-1.0.11_1
  >> Checksum OK for fwbuilder-1.0.11.tar.gz.
  ===>  Patching for fwbuilder-1.0.11_1
  ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for fwbuilder-1.0.11_1
  ===! Running aclocal
  aclocal: not found
  *** Error code 127

  Stop in /usr/ports/security/fwbuilder.

What exactly was that all about? A broken port perhaps?

best regards,
Robert

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


-CURRENT: Buildkernel dies building linprocfs

2004-04-25 Thread Robert Huff

uname -a:

FreeBSD jerusalem.litteratus.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0:
Mon Mar  8 12:27:03 EST 2004

and sources updated at midnight.  Kernel config is appended.
"make buildkernel" dies with:

cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So
rm -f hack.c
sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh JERUSALEM
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict
-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -fformat
-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I-  -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib
/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src
/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contr
ib/ngatm -I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include -I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluet
ooth/drivers/bt3c -I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/drivers/h4 -I/usr/src/sys/ne
tgraph/bluetooth/drivers/ubt -I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/drivers/ubtbcmfw 
-I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/hci -I/usr/src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/l2cap -D
_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000  -mno-align-long-s
trings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror  vers.c
linking kernel.debug
linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_domtab':
/usr/src/sys/sys/namei.h:157: undefined reference to `linux_emul_path'
linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_domtab':
/usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:356: undefined reference to `linux_emu
l_path'
linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_doversion':
/usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:464: undefined reference to `linux_get
_osname'
/usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:465: undefined reference to `linux_get
_osrelease'
linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_donetdev':
/usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:920: undefined reference to `linux_ifn
ame'
linprocfs.o: In function `linprocfs_init':
/usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:1013: undefined reference to `procfs_d
ocurproc'


Don't see anything about this in UPDATING, and nothing on the
web or rhw mailing list archives.


Robert Huff



#
# GENERIC -- Generic machine with WD/AHx/NCR/BTx family disks
#
# For more information read the handbook part System Administration -> 
# Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel -> The Configuration File. 
# The handbook is available in /usr/share/doc/handbook or online as
# latest version from the FreeBSD World Wide Web server 
# http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/>
#
# An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the 
# device lines is present in the ./LINT configuration file. If you are 
# in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first in LINT.
#
#   $Id: GENERIC,v 1.125 1998/10/16 01:30:11 obrien Exp $

machine i386
#cpu"I386_CPU"
#cpu"I486_CPU"
#cpu"I586_CPU"
cpu I686_CPU
ident   JERUSALEM
maxusers0
options CPU_ENABLE_SSE

#optionsMATH_EMULATE#Support for x87 emulation

options SCHED_ULE

options INET#InterNETworking
options INET6   #IPv6 communications protocols

options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)"
options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"

options IPX
#optionsNCP #NetWare Core protocol

options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem
options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem
options CD9660  #ISO 9660 Filesystem
#optionsNWFS#NetWare filesystem

options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support
options UFS_ACL #Support for access control lists
options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big directories
options SCSI_DELAY=100  #Be pessimistic about Joe SCSI
#  note: value is in 
milliseconds
#optionsSAFETY

# Debugging for use in -current
options DDB #Enable the kernel debugger
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options INVARIANTS  #Enable calls of extra sanity checking
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT   #Extra sanity checks of internal structures, 
required by INVARIANTS
options WITNESS #Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles
#optionsWITNESS_SKIPSPIN#Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed

options COMPAT_43   #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!]
options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory
options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues
options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores

options COMPAT_AOUT

#optionsCOMPAT_LINUX
options LINPROCFS
options PSEUDOFS


#   For

RE: installing ipfilter

2004-04-25 Thread JJB
Ipfilter is an built in firewall just like IPFW.
They both are distributed in the base Freebsd system.
Ipfilter is the name of the firewall "man ipf" will show you the
info you are looking for.
Ipfilter is an loadable module which means it is not necessary to
add kernel option statements to the kernel source and recompile the
kernel. The addition of the ipfilter rc.conf statements will
automatically load the ipfilter module.

Rc.conf statements.
ipfilter_enable="YES"# Start ipf firewall
ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules"  # loads rules definition text
file
 # IE: not script file with
rules in it
ipmon_enable="YES"   # Start ip monitor log
ipmon_flags="-Ds"# D = start as daemon
 # s = log to syslog
 # v = log tcp window, ack, seq
 # n = map ip & port to names

ipnat_enable="YES"   # Enable ipfilter Nat function
ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules"


Sample ipnat rules

# Provide special NAT services for FTP from LAN users.
map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp

# Provide special NAT services for FTP from gateway system.
map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp

# Provide Normal NAT services for LAN users.
# NAT my private LAN ip address to what every my dynamic ISP address
is.
map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32

# Provide NAT services for user ppp Dial in tun0 connections.
map tun0 10.0.0.0/29 -> 0/32



Sample ipfilter rules


#
# For testing only allow pass all  Bypasses the rest of the rules
#pass in  log quick on dc0 all
#pass out log quick on dc0 all
#log out quick on dc0 all
#


#
# No restrictions on Inside Lan Interface for private network
# Not needed unless you have Lan
#

#pass out quick on xl0 all   # production server config
#pass in  quick on xl0 all   # production server config

pass out quick on rl0 all  # development server config
pass in  quick on rl0 all  # development server config

#
# No restrictions on Loopback Interface
#

pass in  quick on lo0 all
pass out quick on lo0 all

#
# Interface facing Public internet  (Outbound Section)
# Interrogate session start requests originating from behind the
# firewall on the private network
# or from this gateway server destine for the public internet.
#

# Allow out access to my ISP's Domain name server.
# xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx must be the IP address of your ISP's DNS.
# Dup these lines if your ISP has more than one DNS server
# Get the IP addresses from /etc/resolv.conf file
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to 168.162.40.2 port = 53
flags S keep state
pass out quick on dc0 proto udp from any to 168.162.40.2 port = 53
keep state
#pass out log quick on dc0 proto udp from any to any port = 53 keep
state


# Allow out access to my ISP's DHCP server for cable or DSL
networks.
# This rule is not needed for 'user ppp' type connection to the
# public internet, so you can delete this whole group.
# Use the following rule and check log for IP address.
# Then put IP address in commented out rule & delete first rule
pass out quick on dc0 proto udp from any to 168.170.21.152 port = 67
keep state

# Allow out non-secure standard www function
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S
keep state

# Allow out secure www function https over TLS SSL
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 443 flags S
keep state

# Allow out send & get email function
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 25  flags S
keep state
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 110 flags S
keep state

# Allow out Time
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 37 flags S
keep state

# Allow out nntp news
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 119 flags S
keep state

# Allow out gateway & LAN users non-secure FTP ( both passive &
active modes)
# This function uses the IPNAT built in FTP proxy function coded in
# the nat rules file to make this single rule function correctly.
# If you want to use the pkg_add command to install application
packages
# on your gateway system you need this rule.
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 flags S
keep state


# Allow out secure FTP, Telnet, and SCP
# This function is using SSH  (secure shell)
pass out quick on dc0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S
keep state

# Allow out non-secure Telnet
pass out quick on 

Re: "From" aliases using mail and sendmail

2004-04-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:13:05AM +0930, Malcolm Kay wrote:

> I really need something like sendmail aliases but 
> operating on outgoing 'from' addresses rather than 
> incoming 'to' addresses. 

That's precisely what genericstable is for.  You'll need aliases or
virtusertable entries as well, to translate the name back to the UID
when people send replies to that address.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


"From" aliases using mail and sendmail

2004-04-25 Thread Malcolm Kay
May user login is 'malcolm' whereas my ISP allocates 
me an e-Mail address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.

I can get internode.on.net into the domain of the 'from'
address using the masquerade feature in sendmail.

But how can I translate the user part:
  malcolm -> malcolm.kay
when using mail and sendmail?

I really need something like sendmail aliases but 
operating on outgoing 'from' addresses rather than 
incoming 'to' addresses. 

Malcolm

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: installing ipfilter

2004-04-25 Thread Senandung Mendonan
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Robert Storey wrote:

> I wanted to do some experimenting with ipfilter, and strangely, I can't
> figure out how to install it.

It's a kernel option, disabled by default. See /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES,
look for 'IPFILTER'.

--mendonan
"Yang mimpikan secangkir kopi panas dengan selimut.."
 (Dreaming of a cup of hot coffee, and a blanket..")
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Supporting backup batteries over serial port?

2004-04-25 Thread Ralph M. Los
Hi,
I'm thinking of converting the last of my servers (Win2k) to
FreeBSD.  This last box has the following things, and I want to make
sure I can get the equivalent in FreeBSD.  Could someone give me
suggestions on the stuff I can't find info on?

1. Backup (PowerChute-like app, from Belkin?) --> don't know of any
alternative in FreeBSD
2. Exchange 2000 --> Qmail + SquirrelMail + clamAV + SpamAssassin ??
(How hard is this to setup?)
3. Split-DNS server (internal and external) --> Is there a how-to on
BIND for this?
4. PDC --> Assuming SAMBA can do this?  White-Paper, or how-to?
5. Backup Server (BackupExec v9.1) --> Arkeia backup solution?
(Freeware?) or comp??


THANKS everyone, 3 down, one to go!

|Ralph

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  Ralph | Internet Systems & Security   +
+   Boundariez.com   | -"Specializing in Paranoia"-  +
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+  ralph[!at]boundariez[dot!]com |  Never understimate the power +
+AIM: SekurityWizard | stupid people +
+ICQ: 2206039|in large groups+
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


installing ipfilter

2004-04-25 Thread Robert Storey
I wanted to do some experimenting with ipfilter, and strangely, I can't figure
out how to install it.

It doesn't seem to be installed. If I do "which ipfilter" or "man ipfilter",
there's no indication of its existence. I tried "locate ipfilter", I do find
this:

  /usr/share/examples/ipfilter

  /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter

Neither of these appear to be what I need. I've looked in /usr/ports, and can't
find it there either.

I'm using 5.2-RELEASE.

best regards,
Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Matthew,

Tks for your advice.
 
> > Can I use 'zxvf' to untar the packages and do
> 'setup'
> > to install OOo, the normal way not FreeBSD way?  
> 
> No -- in this case the files being referred to are
> in fact FreeBSD
> pkg's.  You can certainly extract the contents using
> 'tar -zxvf', but
> it won't do you a great deal of good.  This isn't
> like the OO packages
> for other OSes, where you unpack a tar-ball and run
> an included shell
> script to copy everything into the appropriate
> locations.  The FreeBSD
> pkg_add(1) program handles all that uncompressing,
> untarring and
> copying things completely automatically, as well as
> doing some
> additional stuff like registering the package in
> /var/db/pkgs

Noted with thanks.  I also want to install OOo 1.1.1
following FreeBSD way.

I'm expecting a reply from Joshua or other folks to my
posting whether I can stop running 'make clean' the
ports trees in the mid-way.  In doing so it won't
damage the OS.  After clarification I shall install
'automake' first. then install/upgrade to
'ORBit-0.5.17_2' and then install OOo 1.1.1
 
> > Is it necessary to remove OOo-1.1 first which I
> > re-setup temperarily to work.
> 
> You might be able to get away with having both
> OpenOffice-1.1 and
> OpenOffice-1.1.1 installed simultaneously, as they
> both install to
> separate subdirs of /usr/local.  However, apart from
> using up huge
> amounts of disk space, I don't see that's going to
> do a great deal for you.

The reason for my question is 'I want to have OOo1.1.1
running smoothly first before erasing OOo 1.1.0"

> OpenOffice-1.1.1 release is available via ports --
> but apparently not
> yet as a precompiled package from
> http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
> or the usual FreeBSD FTP sites.
> 
> You can compile it yourself, but be warned: it's
> huge, has quite a
> long dependency list and takes geological ages to
> compile.  Not for
> the faint hearted or those without a powerful
> machine.

It is really my problem.  I am running FreeBSD on a
slow machine.  I try to avoid installing packages from
source code

B.R.
Stephen

___
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FTP Program

2004-04-25 Thread George Patterson
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 08:50:19 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am currently using WS_FTP Pro version 8.03 on my WinXP Pro machine.
> I was wondering if anyone could recommend a similar type FTP program
> for FreeBSD. I really like the ease of use, scheduling capabilities,
> etc. of WS_FTP and would therefore like to find a similar product for
> use on FreeBSD.
> 

Gerard,

Try gftp. Full Gui interface. should do the trick for you..

Port:   gftp-2.0.17
Path:   /usr/ports/ftp/gftp
Info:   A free multithreaded GTK-based GUI ftp and sftp client


George Patterson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Home server upgrade 4.9 -> 5.2.1, drop in hard diskornetworkperformance?

2004-04-25 Thread Markie

- Original Message - 
From: "Eric Crist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Markie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: Home server upgrade 4.9 -> 5.2.1, drop in hard
diskornetworkperformance?


| On Friday 23 April 2004 09:04, you wrote:
|
| [snip]
|
| > I just now swapped the old 3com card in the servers box with the intel
card
| > from that one and well... it seems to be working fine! Is this a bad
driver
| > or bad hardware? I still have a routing problem, before I can do
anything
| > with the internet after a new connection I have to do the following:
| >
| > route delete default
| > route add 
| > route -n add default -iface 
| >
| > but with this modem it appears you have to do this on openbsd and
netbsd
| > too. I am going to hunt down a way to do it automatically :o) I will
also
| > test the transfer rate stuff again to make sure it wasn't just that old
| > card doing something nasty although I doubt it'd be that
| >
| > I will keep you informed for what it's worth :o)
|
| This is pretty simple.  Simply add the following line to the /etc/rc.conf
| file:
|
| default_route="ip.address.here.please"
|
| HTH

I don't have a static IP address? :o)

Just got back home from a gig today to find the box had locked up again
with 2 icmp redirect messages on the console and an ATA timeout thing

Apr 23 20:54:28 bone kernel: icmp redirect from 80.145.155.146: 0.0.0.0 =>
217.4.98.129
Apr 24 19:13:21 bone kernel: icmp redirect from 195.36.246.89:
192.168.2.100 => 217.5.98.154
Apr 24 23:49:35 bone kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries
left) LBA=1663

Just like that... i'm not sure if it's the timeout that caused the lockup
this time or not. I thought swapping the network cards had fixed it..
well.. I dunno, maybe this is something different?

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 08:32:37PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:

> Can I use 'zxvf' to untar the packages and do 'setup'
> to install OOo, the normal way not FreeBSD way?  

No -- in this case the files being referred to are in fact FreeBSD
pkg's.  You can certainly extract the contents using 'tar -zxvf', but
it won't do you a great deal of good.  This isn't like the OO packages
for other OSes, where you unpack a tar-ball and run an included shell
script to copy everything into the appropriate locations.  The FreeBSD
pkg_add(1) program handles all that uncompressing, untarring and
copying things completely automatically, as well as doing some
additional stuff like registering the package in /var/db/pkgs
 
> Is it necessary to remove OOo-1.1 first which I
> re-setup temperarily to work.

You might be able to get away with having both OpenOffice-1.1 and
OpenOffice-1.1.1 installed simultaneously, as they both install to
separate subdirs of /usr/local.  However, apart from using up huge
amounts of disk space, I don't see that's going to do a great deal for
you.

OpenOffice-1.1.1 release is available via ports -- but apparently not
yet as a precompiled package from http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
or the usual FreeBSD FTP sites.

You can compile it yourself, but be warned: it's huge, has quite a
long dependency list and takes geological ages to compile.  Not for
the faint hearted or those without a powerful machine.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


FTP Program

2004-04-25 Thread Gerard Seibert
I am currently using WS_FTP Pro version 8.03 on my WinXP Pro machine. I
was wondering if anyone could recommend a similar type FTP program for
FreeBSD. I really like the ease of use, scheduling capabilities, etc. of
WS_FTP and would therefore like to find a similar product for use on
FreeBSD.


Thanks!

Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


comparison to solaris9

2004-04-25 Thread J.D. Bronson
Has anyone made any comparisons of performance  of 5.2.1 and solaris9 x86 
on the same gear?

Thanks-

 -JDB

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Liu
- snip -
 
> > No. It's a package, and it's *not* a tgz file.
> 
> Errr... folks -- packages *are* .tgz files.  Except
> under 5.x where
> they are .tbz files.  They could just as well be
> .zip files, or some
> sort of compressed cpio format like .rpms or Solaris
> packages.  It's
> just a mechanism for gathering a bunch of files and
> directories
> together into a single container for easy download. 
> And the
> compression is just so that the maximum number of
> packages can be
> fitted into the space available.

Hi Matthew,

Can I use 'zxvf' to untar the packages and do 'setup'
to install OOo, the normal way not FreeBSD way?  

Is it necessary to remove OOo-1.1 first which I
re-setup temperarily to work.

TIA

B.R.
Stephen

___
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Liu
- snip -

> > > see what's
> > > happening, and install the darned thing.
> > 
> > # pkg_add OOo_1.1.1.RC3_FreeBSD52Intel_install.tbz
> > pkg_add: could not find package ORBit-0.5.17_2 !
> > 
> > Now another problem comes on installing
> RRBit-0.5.17_2
> > as follow;
> > 
> > # cd /usr/ports/
> > # make clean  (first)
> > 
> > The PC is now running for more than 8 hrs. coming
> to
> > 
> > biology/platon
> > Cleaning .
> > 
> > Shall I close the Kconsole window OR let it to
> run.
> 
> You probably wanted
> 
> # cd /usr/ports/devel/ORBit
> # make clean
> 
> What you've done above is to make the entire ports
> tree clean.  The
> 'make clean' before building the port seems a bit
> unnecessary, but
> you're obviously doing it for a reason.


Hi Joshua,

Yes, you are right.

About several days ago I tried to upgrade
'automake-1.4.5_9' to its latest version using
following commands which I knew being incorrect later;

# cd /usr/ports/automake-1.4.5_9
# make deinstall

After starting I saw it removed files which I needed. 
I closed the Konsole window promptly to stop running
it.

Today I tried to force remove 'automake-1.4.5_9' with
following command

# ca /usr/ports/
# pkg_delete automake
pkg_delete: no such package 'automake' installed

# ls /var/db/pkg

automake-1.4.5_9

showing it war there.

# pkg_delete -r automake-1.4.5_9
kg_delete: file '/usr/local/share/automake14/COPYING'
doesn't really exist
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/share/automake14/INSTALL'
doesn't really exist
pkg_delete: file
'/usr/local/share/automake14/acinstall' doesn't really
exist
pkg_delete: file
'/usr/local/share/automake14/ansi2knr.1' doesn't
really exist
pkg_delete: file
'/usr/local/share/automake14/ansi2knr.c' doesn't
really exist
pkg_delete: file
'/usr/local/share/automake14/clean-hdr.am' doesn't
really exist
.
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/share/automake14/ylwrap'
doesn't really exist
pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps
the packing list is incorrectly specified?)

I tried again
# pkg_delete -r automake-1.4.5_9
pkg_delete: no such package 'automake-1.4.5_9'
installed.

It was very strange.  So I prepared to force-install
the latest version of automake.  Before doing so I
tried to 'make clean' the port trees first to see
whether it will help

Now can I stop running 'make clean' by closing the
Konsole window.  In doing so would it cause damage to
the OS

Kindly advise.

TIA

Furthermore connection to Internet died. I could not
re-connect it.  I think I need to reboot the PC.  

B.R.
Stephen




___
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Which version of freebsd..

2004-04-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:54:56AM +0200, lists wrote:
> Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
> freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...
> 
> But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
> for a long time.. what version should we take then?

4.9-RELEASE will be supported[1] for at least a year from it's release,
as is normal with all the the 4.x series.  However, support for
4.8-RELEASE has been specifically extended until 31 March 2005, and
it's listed EOL is actually later than the one for 4.9 at the moment.

http://www.freebsd.org/security/

The upcoming 4.10-RELEASE will presumably be supported for the usual
12 months from release, which takes it to an EOL at around the same
time as currently stated for 4.8-RELEASE and 4-STABLE.
 
> We will be using it for multiple servers (mail, database, app, web
> etc..)

You have two choices: either the conservative one of installing one of
the 4.x releases, or the risky one of installing a 5.x release.  If
your profit margin or job security depends on the performance of those
servers, go with 4.x.  You'll have getting on for another year of
support, at which time you will have a choice of well-tested 5.x
releases to jump to.

Or you can just go to 5.x immediately -- avoiding the effort of a 4.x
to 5.x transition.  However be aware that 5.x releases are still
"Early Adopter", which among other things means that they don't get a
very long support period[2].  In which case, expect to have to do an
upgrade from 5.2.1 to 5.3 in the fairly near future.

That Early Adopter status will change with the creation of the
5-STABLE branch and 5.3-RELEASE, which should happen later this
summer.  After that point the 5.x releases will be recognised as
full-blown FreeBSD releases and receive the normal length of support.

Cheers,

Matthew

[1] Support in this case means that security bugs in the base system
will be fixed.  It doesn't mean that such things as ports are
guarranteed to work correctly.  The whole ports mechanism is only
thoroughly tested by the routine package building process, which takes
place on the latest 4.x and 5.x release branches. Although it is
generally possible to made the ports system work on older systems,
this cannot be absolutely guarranteed.

[2] There was some consternation after the release of
FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp.asc when many people first realised that
5.1-RELEASE was no longer supported.

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ibm x345 and freebsd

2004-04-25 Thread frank cheong
No.
 
While the screen freeze is only ACPI related problems. Just disable the ACPI when 
setup asked (F2) and the screen won't freeze anymore. While hte RELEN_5_2_1_RELEASE 
can't recognize the servRAID 6i that is come with IBM x345. I am still trying 
different combination.
Refer to this post for details
http://www.freebsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20473
 
Thx & Rgds,
Frank

Mesut_G軩NAZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
have u succeed to install ant freebsd version on ibm x345 with serve raid 6i
 
i could not do this. coz of screeb freeze on setup menu. and kernel panic.
 
if u did can u help me how?

必殺技、飲歌、小星星...
浪漫鈴聲  情心連繫
http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: firewall settings and dhcpd

2004-04-25 Thread Lewis Thompson
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:33:22PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I'm getting this in my log/messages:
> 
> Apr 25 13:25:42 mybox dhcpd: send_packet: Permission denied
> 
> Could it be that a certain firewall setting or something missing
> would be causing this?

Possibly.  It might be worth including some details of your current
firewall settings.

-lewiz.

-- 
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.  --Bob Dylan, 1964.

-| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


firewall settings and dhcpd

2004-04-25 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I'm getting this in my log/messages:

Apr 25 13:25:42 mybox dhcpd: send_packet: Permission denied

Could it be that a certain firewall setting or something missing
would be causing this?


--
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: X in FreeBSD needs Linux-start

2004-04-25 Thread Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner
Here is my graphic-card-information, if it is needed:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x03 card=0x000110b0 chip=0x00de rev=0xb2 
hdr=0x00vendor   = 'NVIDIA Corporation'
device   = 'GeForce2 MX 100/200 (DDR) [NV11DDR]'
class= display
subclass = VGA


Thorsten
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Open Office - installation problem

2004-04-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 10:49:50AM -0700, Joshua Lokken wrote:
> * Terry L. Tyson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 08:32]:

> > It's not a package, it's a tgz file. Use "tar xzvf file.tgz". Go to the
> > OO site and read the install instructions, there are other things you
> 
> No. It's a package, and it's *not* a tgz file.

Errr... folks -- packages *are* .tgz files.  Except under 5.x where
they are .tbz files.  They could just as well be .zip files, or some
sort of compressed cpio format like .rpms or Solaris packages.  It's
just a mechanism for gathering a bunch of files and directories
together into a single container for easy download.  And the
compression is just so that the maximum number of packages can be
fitted into the space available.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: crazy mouse

2004-04-25 Thread Ph. Schulz
Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>
>I just changed a new m/board and found my mouse went crazy, it's out of
> control most of the time and tends to stay in one corner and "shakes"
> itself. it is a generic PS/2 mouse, 2 buttons, no special something, no
> scroller, no nothing. i tried to change "Protocol" in my XF86Config, tried
> "PS/2" "auto" "SysMouse" "IntelliMouse", up to now only "SysMouse" works,
>

If you run moused(8), the device in XF86Config should be /dev/sysmouse
and the protocol should be set to "SysMouse". I assume you run moused(8)
with something like

  moused_flags="-p /dev/psm0 -t auto"

in your /etc/rc.conf . If so, does the mouse work on the console? If
not, you might want to read psm(4). I had to add

  hint.psm.0.flags="0x100"

to /boot/device.hints . Note that this is not availeable in FreeBSD 4.x
but instead you will need to add those flags to your kernel config. Find
a line that says

  device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12

and make it

  device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 flags 0x100

Hope this helps, it worked for me.

Regards,

Phil.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Which version of freebsd..

2004-04-25 Thread Lewis Thompson
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:54:56AM +0200, lists wrote:
> Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
> freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...
> 
> But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
> for a long time.. what version should we take then?

Looks like 4.10 is in beta so if you're looking for stability it might
be worth hanging on until it hits -RELEASE (or, install 4.9 and then
cvsup).

  Bear in mind 5 is still a technology release and should not be used
for production servers.

-lewiz.

-- 
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.  --Bob Dylan, 1964.

-| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: What version of freebsd..

2004-04-25 Thread Andy Miller
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:26:55AM +0200, Arno Haverlach wrote:
> Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
> freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...
> 
> But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
> for a long time.. what version should we take then?
> 
> We will be using it for multiple servers (mail, database, app, web
> etc..)
> 

It depends.  Most people will tell you that 4.9 will be the best version to use
for a production environment, and they would be right.  However, the 4.x branch
won't be around forever.  Some day in the not so distant future, 5.x will go
to -stable.

If you want proven reliability, go with 4.9.  If you think you might want to 
upgrade to 5.x in the near future, you might want to use 5.2 so you don't have
to hassle upgrading from 4.x to 5.x.  I have personally been using 5.x since
it was still only -current.  I've had no problems on any 5.x-release systems,
they've always preformed well.

I hope this helps you decide.  Good luck with your switch.

--
Andy Miller

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Which version of freebsd..

2004-04-25 Thread lists
Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...

But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
for a long time.. what version should we take then?

We will be using it for multiple servers (mail, database, app, web
etc..)



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


What version of freebsd..

2004-04-25 Thread Arno Haverlach
Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...

But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
for a long time.. what version should we take then?

We will be using it for multiple servers (mail, database, app, web
etc..)

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Mail Delivery (failure design-patterns-source@cs.uiuc.edu)

2004-04-25 Thread Design Patterns Source reflector
To get the source for the Design Patterns book, please send
a message with "send design pattern source" as the subject.
If you want a version that is zipped (instead of tarred),
please use "send zipped" as the subject.  If you want a version
in German, send "send German design pattern source" as the subject.

You can also try ftp to st.cs.uiuc.edu in /pub/patterns/dpcat,
or look at the patterns home page
(http://st-www.cs.uiuc.edu/patterns/patterns.html)

If you can't get ANYTHING to work, complain to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks!
The source server.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


X in FreeBSD needs Linux-start

2004-04-25 Thread Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner
Hello,

a funny thing I mention: My FreeBSD-Box (first 4.9, now 5.2.1) boots up to the 
login-prompt. Then, after typing ´startx´ (default=waimea) nothing is going on, the 
HD´s LED is blinking and then the machine is sleeping until I press strg+c. If I want 
to start xfce4 by typing ´startxfce4´, all is done, but the net-services in xfce4 are 
sleeping aswell.

No, the wonder in my story, if I start Mandrake-Linux first, reboot the box and start 
FreeBSD again, all things are wonderful and I can login to X (waimea) and do my daily 
work.

This is not the way I want to go in nearest future, I want to check out the failure 
and workaround it. Google had no informations for me, so I have to ask here.

Thanks and regards,

Thorsten

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-04-04 - 2004-04-24

2004-04-25 Thread Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical 
examples and how-to guides.  This message is posted weekly
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website.  Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list 
archives  
and/or The FreeBSD Diary . 


-- 
Dan Langille
BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"