IMAP-UW problems
Hi guys, I've compiled IMAP-UW from the ports-tree with the following option: WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT I can telnet to port 993, internal and external, and the imapd is being invoked by inetd. However, I still can't login. My machine throws out this kernel message: Jul 7 10:48:34 www imapd[67784]: Login failed user=foo auth=foo host=mail.wcborstel.nl [1.2.3.4] However, /var/log/maillog says this: Jul 7 10:48:42 www imapd[67784]: Logout user=foo host=mail.wcborstel.nl [1.2.3.4] I've used make cert to generate the SSL certificate. However, mail.wcborstel.nl is not the actual hostname of the machine. I don't know if that is an issue or not. I hope you guys can help me out. Thanks in advance, Jorn. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10 Installation/configuration
Hi I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard configuration for my Region [UK] and I was wondering if anybody can put me straight on how to re-configure from the Command line. [ I have the ' Handbook ' and Lehey's ' Complete FBSD ' but cannot seem to find the answer. Grateful for any advice. ajn [albert] A. J, Newell ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Installation/configuration
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:36:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard configuration for my Region [UK] and I was wondering if anybody can put me straight on how to re-configure from the Command line. [ I have the ' Handbook ' and Lehey's ' Complete FBSD ' but cannot seem to find the answer. Grateful for any advice. For the console, add: keymap=uk.iso to /etc/rc.conf -- that will make sure you get the correct keyboard map after rebooting. You can set the keymap manually by: # kbdcontrol /dev/ttyv0 -l uk.iso Look at /etc/defaults/rc.conf for many more examples of configuration settings. Nb. That covers just the console interface -- you need some separate configuration to set the keymap correctly for X-windows. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config or /etc/X11/xorg.conf file, changing the keyboard's 'InputDevice' section to something like the sollowing: Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver keyboard Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayout gb EndSection See also setxkbmap(1). Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp6czhfiNWXp.pgp Description: PGP signature
BandwidthD syntax error?
Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 That's where it crashes. If I try running it from /usr/local/etc/rc.d with the following command, I get the following error: grog# sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bandwidthd.sh start Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 bandwidthdgrog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Now, this is the config file that is shipped with bandwidthd, with the only change being my personal IP information. The other funny part: line 40 doesn't exist. The last line in the document is 39. Thanks for your help. Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current
Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. --- Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no way to decided the user/group and permission of the device created. (/etc/devfs.conf can be used, but it had to be start after the device is created, where it is not created at boot time). devfs(8) rules should be automatically applied to all devices as they're created. Setting up the rules at boot time should be exactly what you need. Is this not happening? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/ _ ... http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BandwidthD syntax error?
Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to
run it from it's home directory:
Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248
grog# Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
That's where it crashes. If I try running it from /usr/local/etc/rc.d
with the following command, I get the following error:
grog# sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bandwidthd.sh start
Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248
bandwidthdgrog# Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Opening dc0
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Syntax Error parse error on line 40
Now, this is the config file that is shipped with bandwidthd, with the
only change being my personal IP information. The other funny part:
line 40 doesn't exist. The last line in the document is 39.
I'm not familiar with bandwidthd, but I'm familiar with that type of error.
It seems most parsers generate an error referring to last line + 1 when they
fall off the end of the file without closing a block. i.e. the parser
encountered a starting { but never found the closing } (This can hold true
for , (), and probably many other grouping symbols)
So, the first thing to do is to check all your brackets and quotes and make
sure they're properly balanced. Since it's only a 39 line config, it
shouldn't be too hard to track down. If you find that it _is_ a problem
with the default config file, and not an error you introduced, you should
file a PR.
HTH
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange error while installing apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9
hi, i got a strange problem with apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1.. while installing it says: mkdir /usr/local/libexec/apache2 /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode= install cp mod_access.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_access.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_access.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_access.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode= install cp mod_auth.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode= install cp mod_auth_anon.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth_anon.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth_anon.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_auth_anon.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. and so on for every module a bit below i get this (still on make install): Making install in support libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' libtool: install: warning: `/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/lib/apache2' Building shared: mod_access.la mod_auth.la mod_auth_anon.la mod_auth_dbm.la mod_auth_digest.la Building shared: mod_file_cache.la Building shared: mod_charset_lite.la mod_cache.la mod_disk_cache.la Building shared: mod_include.la mod_deflate.la Building shared: mod_log_config.la mod_logio.la Building shared: mod_env.la mod_mime_magic.la mod_cern_meta.la mod_expires.la mod_headers.la mod_usertrack.la mod_unique_id.la mod_setenvif.la Building shared: mod_proxy.la mod_proxy_connect.la mod_proxy_ftp.la mod_proxy_http.la Building shared: mod_ssl.la Building shared: mod_mime.la Building shared: mod_dav.la Building shared: mod_status.la mod_autoindex.la mod_asis.la mod_info.la mod_cgi.la Building shared: mod_dav_fs.la Building shared: mod_vhost_alias.la mod_negotiation.la mod_dir.la mod_imap.la mod_actions.la mod_speling.la mod_userdir.la mod_alias.la mod_rewrite.la Installing configuration files Installing HTML documents mkdir /usr/local/www/data-dist Installing error documents mkdir /usr/local/www/error-dist cd /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/docs/error cp -rp * /usr/local/www/error-dist Installing icons mkdir /usr/local/www/icons-dist cd /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/docs/icons cp -rp * /usr/local/www/icons-dist Installing CGIs mkdir /usr/local/www/cgi-bin-dist cd /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/docs/cgi-examples cp -rp * /usr/local/www/cgi-bin-dist Installing header files Installing man pages and online
RE: BandwidthD syntax error?
If you want to post your configuration file Ill take a look at it. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -Original Message- From: Eric Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 7:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BandwidthD syntax error? Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 That's where it crashes. If I try running it from /usr/local/etc/rc.d with the following command, I get the following error: grog# sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bandwidthd.sh start Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 bandwidthdgrog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Now, this is the config file that is shipped with bandwidthd, with the only change being my personal IP information. The other funny part: line 40 doesn't exist. The last line in the document is 39. Thanks for your help. Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart
After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith this? First we need to create a baseline...Do you get any error messages, or does sendmail just appear to hang? Can you ping from this machine? Do you have a firewall setup on the box? Do you have 'sendmail_enable=YES' in /etc/rc.conf? Do the following and perhaps post the output so we know what stage in the game you are at: # cat /etc/resolv.conf # dig freebsd.org # dig @204.101.251.2 freebsd.org Every time I have had sendmail problems, it has always come back to DNS failures. HTH, Steve I'm swsapping out my Linksys NIC between my old DNS server and the new. Wih the 10/100 card in the old server, thinks work flwlessly; in the new they don't. Any ideas on what I need to configure, and hw? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current
In the last episode (Jul 07), Patrick Dung said: Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. Devfs rules use wildcard matches: path pattern Matches any node with a path that matches pattern. The latter is interpreted as a glob(3)-style pattern. So just use bpf* instead of bpf0 in your devfs rule. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current
Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. Running devfs(8) at boot time will set rules that will be automatically applied to bpf1 when it is created. What do your devfs rules look like? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bypass no new partitions protection ?
Hi all In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some kind of protection that won't allow the system to create any new partitions while the system is running. Is there any way to bypass this behaviour? a patch? a trick ? I really need to overcome this but found no way. There should be a way to create partitions on the 2nd disk, since it's not being used by the system.. Many thanks! -- www.6s-gaming.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Devices not being built
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wireless card. I've configured and built the kernel with the followings devices device wlan# 802.11 support device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. device awi # BayStack 660 and others device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. The problem is that no devices are being built in /dev for the above. What am I doing wrong? Thanks Mike Sacauskis 5.2.1 uses devfs by default. A device won't get created in the devfs filesystem unless a driver registers it. Do you actually have devices physically installed in the machine that are supported by each of those drivers? Nathan -- PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD8527E49 pgpXKpnupXaQS.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: BandwidthD syntax error?
Here you go! =START CONFIG= subnet 63.228.14.240 255.255.255.248 dev dc0 #skip_intervals 0 #graph_cutoff 1024 #promiscuous true #output_cdf false #recover_cdf false #filter ip #graph true =STOP CONFIG= Thanks for your help. Please note, this is a short config file, but I now get an error on line 10, even though there are only 9 lines. Thanks. Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist -Original Message- From: Michael Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:31 AM To: 'Eric Crist'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BandwidthD syntax error? If you want to post your configuration file Ill take a look at it. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -Original Message- From: Eric Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 7:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BandwidthD syntax error? Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 That's where it crashes. If I try running it from /usr/local/etc/rc.d with the following command, I get the following error: grog# sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bandwidthd.sh start Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 bandwidthdgrog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Syntax Error parse error on line 40 Now, this is the config file that is shipped with bandwidthd, with the only change being my personal IP information. The other funny part: line 40 doesn't exist. The last line in the document is 39. Thanks for your help. Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free bsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM To: Gary Kline Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith this? First we need to create a baseline...Do you get any error messages, or does sendmail just appear to hang? Can you ping from this machine? Do you have a firewall setup on the box? Do you have 'sendmail_enable=YES' in /etc/rc.conf? Do the following and perhaps post the output so we know what stage in the game you are at: # cat /etc/resolv.conf # dig freebsd.org # dig @204.101.251.2 freebsd.org Every time I have had sendmail problems, it has always come back to DNS failures. HTH, Steve I'm swsapping out my Linksys NIC between my old DNS server and the new. Wih the 10/100 card in the old server, thinks work flwlessly; in the new they don't. Any ideas on what I need to configure, and hw? Something else that would really help would be to edit your /etc/mail/sendmail.cf file on the line that starts with LogLevel. It is probably set to 9. Change this value to 20 or so, and from /etc/mail, type make restart. View the end of your /var/log/maillog file by typing the following command, and post these results to the list: # tail -n 50 /var/log/maillog This will help us see if there is anything going on. Adding the output of 'date' at the time you ran the above command would help as well. Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turning off submission (587) port
Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Wed Jul 7 2004 at 03:02:59 daily.cvd updated (version: 393, sigs: 1409, f-level: 2, builder: trog) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:32:12AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith this? First we need to create a baseline...Do you get any error messages, or does sendmail just appear to hang? Can you ping from this machine? Do you have a firewall setup on the box? Do you have 'sendmail_enable=YES' in /etc/rc.conf? Do the following and perhaps post the output so we know what stage in the game you are at: # cat /etc/resolv.conf # dig freebsd.org # dig @204.101.251.2 freebsd.org Every time I have had sendmail problems, it has always come back to DNS failures. I'm swsapping out my Linksys NIC between my old DNS server and the new. Wih the 10/100 card in the old server, thinks work flwlessly; in the new they don't. Any ideas on what I need to configure, and hw? I made a lot of progress since this last email. What I'm doing is swapping my old DNS server (emachines) for a heftier (HP Kayak). I did not have /usr/lcal/etc/dhcpd.conf on the new HP server configured correctly. I edited, KVM'ing between the old Emachines, and things got better: ping, for example. But ssh still took a *long* time. My hardware guy has swapped my DSL ethernet card about four times. Right now, things are back to the way they were and everything works. *This time* I've scp'd the dhcp.conf file over to this server, tao. In about an hour we're going to swap things back. (Of course, without DNS, thought.org vnishes. I expect to hear lots of angry email about couldn't-get-thru, but too bad. My hardware pal is going home fairly soon, and I can't do this solo So..) thanks fo your help. gary PS: My DNS stuff seemed ok. -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:11AM -0500, Eric Crist wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM To: Gary Kline Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith this? First we need to create a baseline...Do you get any error messages, or does sendmail just appear to hang? Can you ping from this machine? Do you have a firewall setup on the box? Do you have 'sendmail_enable=YES' in /etc/rc.conf? Do the following and perhaps post the output so we know what stage in the game you are at: # cat /etc/resolv.conf # dig freebsd.org # dig @204.101.251.2 freebsd.org Every time I have had sendmail problems, it has always come back to DNS failures. HTH, Steve I'm swsapping out my Linksys NIC between my old DNS server and the new. Wih the 10/100 card in the old server, thinks work flwlessly; in the new they don't. Any ideas on what I need to configure, and hw? Something else that would really help would be to edit your /etc/mail/sendmail.cf file on the line that starts with LogLevel. It is probably set to 9. Change this value to 20 or so, and from /etc/mail, type make restart. View the end of your /var/log/maillog file by typing the following command, and post these results to the list: # tail -n 50 /var/log/maillog This will help us see if there is anything going on. Adding the output of 'date' at the time you ran the above command would help as well. Right; my maillog was getting loaded with output (at LogLevel==15) but it said that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was being denied. Prob'ly because dhcp esd not ruunning. more later, hopefully!!! gary -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and comment or delete the follwoing line: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E and restart sendmail afterwards. regarding ipfw, reject tcp from any to me 587 would be an appropriate rule. Thomas -- Thomas Wolf Wiener Software Fabrik Dubas u. Wolf GMBH 1050 Wien, Mittersteig 4 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? 1. cd /etc/mail/ 2. Edit `hostname`.mc (if it doesn't exist, cd /etc/mail; make) 3. Add this next to one of the other FEATURE() lines: FEATURE(`no_default_msa') 4. Type: make install (will overwrite sendmail.cf so if you have customized that file by hand, you will lose those customizations) 5. Type: make restart ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and comment or delete the follwoing line: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E and restart sendmail afterwards. Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad idea. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portsclean -DD
The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of using portsclean -DD. I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree, or does it do this in addition to the behavior of the single -D switch? The reason I ask is that I'd like to share a distfiles directory between two machines, and I'd like to be able to simply clean out any distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree without disturbing the distfiles for any ports that may be installed on either box. Thanks. -- Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
Gregory, Great reply... I like how you gave the exact instructions. Shawn --- Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? 1. cd /etc/mail/ 2. Edit `hostname`.mc (if it doesn't exist, cd /etc/mail; make) 3. Add this next to one of the other FEATURE() lines: FEATURE(`no_default_msa') 4. Type: make install (will overwrite sendmail.cf so if you have customized that file by hand, you will lose those customizations) 5. Type: make restart ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 12:24 pm, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and comment or delete the follwoing line: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E and restart sendmail afterwards. Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad idea. I agree - I ended up adding FEATURE(`no_default_msa') to my respected *.mc file. That did the trick. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Wed Jul 7 2004 at 03:02:59 daily.cvd updated (version: 393, sigs: 1409, f-level: 2, builder: trog) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't install kdebase
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 11.13, Jason Oakley wrote: Resend as my previous emails didn't seem to arrive. I can't get kdebase to install. This is a new FreeBSD build from Mini ISO. kde has not been installed on here before. I first installed evolution. Now KDE. I've tried building from ports. I've deleted the work/ directory and tried again. I've deleted the kdebase directory and cvsupped the latest ports. Still can't build it. Did you try to add it as a binary package? sh# setenv PACKAGESITE sh# pkg_add -r kdebase M. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
APM and DRI lockups when suspending
Does anybody know if there is a workaround for the problem with DRI and APM within X? If I load the DRI module in my XF86Config file, and attempt to suspend my laptop, the system freezes on resume, then reboots. If I comment out the line Load dri out of the Module section in /etc/X11/XF86Config, all is well. But now I don't have direct rendering capability, correct? I don't think I have any apps yet that need direct rendering, so it probably isn't a huge deal (yet), but I would like to have it enable if possible. Does anybody know of a solution or simple workaround for this problem? Thanks, Duane Winner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pf on 4.10
that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE ~hamlet On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)
I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with mon ... the service monitoring daemon for Linux. It doesn't appear as if there's a FreeBSD port. Is there a FreeBSD port of mon, and I'm just searching the ports wrong? I'd like to continue to use mon for the time being, as I'm switching a ton of other stuff over right now, and I don't want to introduce any more changes than necessary at this time. But I'll switch if I have to. If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)
Nagios. I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very well. Many more features than mon IMO. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:06:01 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with mon ... the service monitoring daemon for Linux. It doesn't appear as if there's a FreeBSD port. Is there a FreeBSD port of mon, and I'm just searching the ports wrong? I'd like to continue to use mon for the time being, as I'm switching a ton of other stuff over right now, and I don't want to introduce any more changes than necessary at this time. But I'll switch if I have to. If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
APM and DRI lockups when suspending
Duane, there have always been issues with this aspect of APM. I have found it sufficient to run two X servers to handle the issue. Most of my software runs in an X session without DRI enabled and then when I want to run accelerated 3D I just start up another X session with DRI enabled. For example, this can be done by running the following command from an xterm in the first (normal, non-DRI session): startx -- :1 -xf86config XF86Config.dri I've got DRI enabled in the XF86Config.dri file (which just resides under /etc/X11 along side the default config file) and this command starts up an X session on ttyv9 (alt-ctrl-F10). Be sure that you use a different window manager in your .xinitrc if you use either Gnome or KDE!! When I want to suspend, I just shut down the accelerated X session and then when I resume I can start it back up again without ill effects. I hope this helps! Sean Does anybody know if there is a workaround for the problem with DRI and APM within X? If I load the DRI module in my XF86Config file, and attempt to suspend my laptop, the system freezes on resume, then reboots. If I comment out the line Load dri out of the Module section in /etc/X11/XF86Config, all is well. But now I don't have direct rendering capability, correct? I don't think I have any apps yet that need direct rendering, so it probably isn't a huge deal (yet), but I would like to have it enable if possible. Does anybody know of a solution or simple workaround for this problem? Thanks, Duane Winner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pf on 4.10
Please clarify; It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd built in firewall solution. It will have it's own boot time loadable module just like ipfilter. No kernel recompile needed to enable it. Is this correct? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of hamlet Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:59 PM To: JJB Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: pf on 4.10 that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE ~hamlet On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portsclean -DD
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of using portsclean -DD. I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree, or does it do this in addition to the behavior of the single -D switch? The reason I ask is that I'd like to share a distfiles directory between two machines, and I'd like to be able to simply clean out any distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree without disturbing the distfiles for any ports that may be installed on either box. Portsclean -DD will clean distfiles for ports which are not installed _and_ distfiles that are not used by anything in the ports tree. You can verify it for yourself with: portsclean -nDD since the with the -n, no files are actually deleted and you can see what action it would have taken. HTH, Randy -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
* Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0701 18:01]: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. While we're on the subject, how do I stop sendmail starting, and sow salt on the inodes so nothing grows there again? I want exim instead. I grepped quickly through /etc/defaults/rc.conf and didn't see anything obvious. And ISTR there's a make.conf option too, isn't there? (I've been away since freeBSD 4.7 ish). -- Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery'? -- Jay Leno Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)
Hey Bill, If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? monit[1] and monitord[2]. I mainly use FreeBSD and OpenBSD boxes right now, and I couldn't get monitord to run on OpenBSD, so I've switched to monit. There's a security warning roaming about on monit and http, so don't get bitten. For remote services, look at nefu[3]. It does dependencies (yay!) and is a breeze to set up (yay again!). Dunno about nagios. [1] http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/ [2] http://www.freebsd.org/ports/sysutils.html [3] http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/nefu/ HTH... Nico ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portsclean -DD
On 07-Jul-2004 Randy Pratt wrote: On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree, or does it do this in addition to the behavior of the single -D switch? The reason I ask is that I'd like to share a distfiles directory between two machines, and I'd like to be able to simply clean out any distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the tree without disturbing the distfiles for any ports that may be installed on either box. Portsclean -DD will clean distfiles for ports which are not installed _and_ distfiles that are not used by anything in the ports tree. You can verify it for yourself with: portsclean -nDD since the with the -n, no files are actually deleted and you can see what action it would have taken. Ah, yes, of course. Didn't even think to try that. :-) Rather unfortunate, though, as it would be really nice to be able to separate the two functions. Looking at the source of portsclean, it looks like he just bumps up an inclusive distclean level for each -D switch found. I'll Cc: this to the author and see what he thinks about it. Thanks. -- Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0701 18:01]: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. While we're on the subject, how do I stop sendmail starting, and sow salt on the inodes so nothing grows there again? I want exim instead. I grepped quickly through /etc/defaults/rc.conf and didn't see anything obvious. And ISTR there's a make.conf option too, isn't there? Have a look at /etc/mail/mailer.conf and the associated man page. It's quite possible that there's magic in the Makefile for the Exim port to update mailer.conf for you. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pf on 4.10
as far as i remember, that's correct. this is moderately fuzzy memory from the 'state of freebsd' presentation at usenix, but appears to match my rather sketchy notes. ~hamlet On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, JJB wrote: Please clarify; It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd built in firewall solution. It will have it's own boot time loadable module just like ipfilter. No kernel recompile needed to enable it. Is this correct? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of hamlet Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:59 PM To: JJB Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: pf on 4.10 that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE ~hamlet On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maillog
Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest anything?? Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Connecting to tao.thought.org. via relay... Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[293]: i67Jqns5000290: SMTP outgoing connect on sage Jul 7 12:53:14 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: SMTP outgoing connect on sage Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: i67JnXs5000282: --- 050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: i67JnXs5000282: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=00:08:01, xdelay=00:08:01, mailer=relay, pri=87421, relay=tao.thought.org. [10.0.0.247], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: NOQUEUE: --- 050 Closing connection to tao.thought.org. -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maillog
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 03:07 pm, Gary Kline wrote: Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest anything?? Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Connecting to tao.thought.org. via relay... Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[293]: i67Jqns5000290: SMTP outgoing connect on sage Jul 7 12:53:14 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: SMTP outgoing connect on sage Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: i67JnXs5000282: --- 050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: i67JnXs5000282: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=00:08:01, xdelay=00:08:01, mailer=relay, pri=87421, relay=tao.thought.org. [10.0.0.247], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve Jul 7 12:57:59 sage sm-mta[284]: NOQUEUE: --- 050 Closing connection to tao.thought.org. I can't say 100%, but it's not resolving (I know, duh). In addition to whatever you are running, try some whitelisting. For example: From: mx2.freebsd.org yes From: 216.136.204.119 yes This is my MailScanner whitelist. Note I have both IP and name for the FreeBSD lists. I don't know if this will help you any - but it does for me. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Wed Jul 7 2004 at 03:02:59 daily.cvd updated (version: 393, sigs: 1409, f-level: 2, builder: trog) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD via BitTorrent
Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via BitTorrent. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A few simple questions(...if you don't mind)
On 6 Jul 2004, at 11:36, Erik Trulsson wrote: If you go back a bit further in time there was the Great Worm of 1988, which targeted VAX and Sun3 systems running BSD code, and which actually did bring down most of the Internet at the time. That was the incident that got people in the Unix community to start thinking seriously about security. Then again, I survived that. My Unix box was running Coloured Book, so the worm didn't see us. There was one really horrible telnetd exploit which the script kiddies got hold of which let them in as root. Trashed a server I had at the time in the midwest. The only way I survived was that they did it on September 10th 2001, so the client had other things to think about soon after --- Andy Holyer, Technical stuff Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB 08451 260895 x 241 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenSSL with threads enabled, problem getting it to install
Hello, Firstly I am fairly new to FreeBSD and I have been stuck on this for a couple of weeks now. I am installing a web server, Resin, that in order to run ssl connections needs to have openssl compiled with threads enabled. I am running FreeBSD 4.10 Stable, it is brand new computer with a clean install. I have gotten Resin installed and working via the ports. and am now trying to get it to work with https connections. When I start resin it gives the error Resin requires a threaded version of OpenSSL. OpenSSL must be compiled with OPENSSL_THREADS for Resin to use it. So I went to the /usr/ports/security/openssl/ and ran make -DOPENSSL_THREADS; make install; make clean; restarted (I am from the world of windows) and tried to start resin, with the same error, so I dont think it took. I have tried using -DOPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE and that did not seem to work either. If I run make, then go into the openssl0.9.6d directory and run the command ./config threads, It will not compile at all and gives an error about the crypto.c file. The openssl site just says that most OSes have it built by default with threads enabled, and if it is not to build it with threads enabled. But I dont know how. Anyone know what dumb thing I am doing/not doing so I can get Openssl built with threads enabled. Thank you in advance, Gene Gilbert __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postmap main.cf
I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postmap main.cf
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. locate postmap, which postmap, or find / -name postmap are possible ways of searching for the command. Note that it is very unlikely you want to run postmap on main.cf. Something like postmap hash:access might be reasonable. -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postmap main.cf
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] server# whereis postmap postmap: /usr/local/sbin/postmap /usr/local/man/man1/postmap.1.gz server# Michael -- Michael D. Whities [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.one-arm.com -- There are four colors of hats to watch for: Black, White, Grey, and Red. The meanings are: Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postmap main.cf
Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. whereis postmap find / -name postmap -print If you install Postfix from ports, it should be in your path. Although ... I can't imagine why you would run postmap on main.cf ... you should probably read man postmap before trying again. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Devices not being built
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wi reless card. I've configured and built the kernel with the followings devices device wlan# 802.11 support device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. device awi # BayStack 660 and others device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. The problem is that no devices are being built in /dev for the above. Wh at am I doing wrong? Thanks Mike Sacauskis 5.2.1 uses devfs by default. A device won't get created in the devfs filesystem unless a driver registers it. Do you actually have devices physically installed in the machine that are supported by each of those drivers? Nathan -- PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD8527E49 I have a WMP card and I thought that the an driver was supposed to work for that. I threw in the others to see if they would show up. Always keep the list copied on replies. I didn't see any Linksys wireless cards explicitly listed in the 5.2.1 hardware notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware-i386.html#AEN815 Some searches on the web are sure to turn up some pages about others trying to get that and similar cards to work with FreeBSD. Nathan -- PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD8527E49 pgpFCJ5SDxBMq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)
Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nagios. I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very well. Many more features than mon IMO. Thanks for the input. I also found Big Sister, which looks pretty nice. Not sure which one I'll use, but this gives me lots to evaluate! On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:06:01 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with mon ... the service monitoring daemon for Linux. It doesn't appear as if there's a FreeBSD port. Is there a FreeBSD port of mon, and I'm just searching the ports wrong? I'd like to continue to use mon for the time being, as I'm switching a ton of other stuff over right now, and I don't want to introduce any more changes than necessary at this time. But I'll switch if I have to. If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
making without threads
I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue make --without-threads but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. how do I list and change make options? -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax:480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: making without threads
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:11:55PM -0700, David Bear wrote: I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue make --without-threads but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. how do I list and change make options? 'make config' works in a lot of ports thesedays, otherwise read the port makefile and set the listed variables. Kris pgpUvBqGs126Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bypass no new partitions protection ?
Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some kind of protection that won't allow the system to create any new partitions while the system is running. You need to cut/paste the _exact_ error message into your question. Is there any way to bypass this behaviour? a patch? a trick ? I really need to overcome this but found no way. There should be a way to create partitions on the 2nd disk, since it's not being used by the system.. I would like to know what patch/trick you used to _create_ this behaviour. I have done exactly what you're describing several times, with never a problem. The default behaviour is to allow you to partition/newfs unused disks in the system. Is your securelevel set high? If so, set it to -1 and reboot the system, then try again. You can't write to disk devices with securelevel at 2 or greater. Other than that, I'm not sure what could be causing the problem. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where o where is it starting from
Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options} sendmail-clientmqueue I looked in rc.local , /usr/local/etc/rc.d and didn't find anything. Not freebsd savy yet to figure it out more. Any help appreciated. THanks Mark ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postmap main.cf
main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You can tell about half way though the Author (Soup4You) had two to many beers so perhaps the postmap was a mistake. I will not postmap the main.cf file. Thank you to everyone who responded to my question and for setting me strait. Your help was welcome fast and friendly. I love this community. Thank you, Joshua Lewis Mark main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. Md - Original Message - From: Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: postmap main.cf I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where o where is it starting from
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options} sendmail-clientmqueue I looked in rc.local , /usr/local/etc/rc.d and didn't find anything. Not freebsd savy yet to figure it out more. Any help appreciated. You probably want to make sure that /etc/rc.conf contains the line: sendmail_enable=NONE then make sure there is a suitable startup script for Postfix in /usr/local/etc/rc.d Note that there are multiple ways to configure FreeBSD to use Postfix instead of sendmail. I'm describing one of them, others are possible. The trick is to ensure that the Postfix programs will run and the sendmail program will never run. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where o where is it starting from
Never mind. I found it. /etc/defaults/rc.conf I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Mark - Original Message - From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:32 PM Subject: where o where is it starting from Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options} sendmail-clientmqueue I looked in rc.local , /usr/local/etc/rc.d and didn't find anything. Not freebsd savy yet to figure it out more. Any help appreciated. THanks Mark ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup behind windows xp
Hi there I got the small problem, I would like to keep my ports collection update using cvsup but I don't have a direct connection to the internet. My Computer is on a network with my Fathers computer which is running windows xp. Lets say I have full access to my fathers computer as long I don't remove windows xp. What would I have to do to my fathers computer and my in order to keep my ports collections updated. I read the man pages something about cvsup using a socks proxy but where do I find this runsock(I look in the ports and try the 'which' command) and how do I use it. Any help, please Grant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
allowing users to mount cdrom again
Hi I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and wanted to try it for myself I did the follow : added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to include the user restarted freebsd (It's amazing what a restart does for me sometimes) but this happens: Grant mount /mnt/cdrom1 cd9660: /dev/acd1: Operation not permitted I am working in Kde usings Kde's Konsole and have two cdroms on FreeBSD 5.2.1 Please help Grant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postmap main.cf
main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You can tell about half way though the Author (Soup4You) had two to many beers so perhaps the postmap was a mistake. I will not postmap the main.cf file. Thank you to everyone who responded to my question and for setting me strait. Your help was welcome fast and friendly. I love this community. Thank you, Joshua Lewis Mark main.cf doesn't get postmaped. only the .map files do. unless its changed since i last upgraded. Md - Original Message - From: Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: postmap main.cf I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD via BitTorrent
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via BitTorrent. http://www.opentorrent.org/ Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?
Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what tag to set in my cvsupfile? I want something similar to RELENG_4 but for 5.x. Ie, the latest release with fixes applied. Which branch is that? Browsing CVSweb I find these: * RELENG_5_2_BP * RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2 * RELENG_5_1_BP * RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_1 * RELENG_5_0_BP * RELENG_5_0_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_0 I don't want CURRENT, so it has to be one of these, I suppose. But I can't find anything on the net that tells me exactly what each branch is. Thanks in advance, Rickard Borgmäster .--..--. .. | || | .-. | Rickard Borgmäster | | || |/ / | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .-^ | .--. | | http://doktorn.sub.nu/ | ( o | ( () ) | |\ \ `' `-' `--' `--' `--' ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
query iir(4) device for disk status
Hi, Does anybody know how I can query the status of the disks accessed via the iir(4) device (Intel Integrated RAID)? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where o where is it starting from
Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Never mind. I found it. /etc/defaults/rc.conf I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Don't modify /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf _does_ override /etc/defaults/rc.conf You should probably check /etc/rc.conf for config errors. Mark - Original Message - From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:32 PM Subject: where o where is it starting from Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options} sendmail-clientmqueue I looked in rc.local , /usr/local/etc/rc.d and didn't find anything. Not freebsd savy yet to figure it out more. Any help appreciated. THanks Mark ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 08:01 pm, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what tag to set in my cvsupfile? I want something similar to RELENG_4 but for 5.x. Ie, the latest release with fixes applied. Which branch is that? Browsing CVSweb I find these: * RELENG_5_2_BP * RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2 * RELENG_5_1_BP * RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_1 * RELENG_5_0_BP * RELENG_5_0_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_0 I don't want CURRENT, so it has to be one of these, I suppose. But I can't find anything on the net that tells me exactly what each branch is. Thanks in advance, Rickard Borgmäster Appendix A6 of the handbook may help: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html Best of luck, Andrew Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:01:11AM +0200, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what tag to set in my cvsupfile? I want something similar to RELENG_4 but for 5.x. Ie, the latest release with fixes applied. Which branch is that? Browsing CVSweb I find these: * RELENG_5_2_BP * RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_2 * RELENG_5_1_BP * RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_1 * RELENG_5_0_BP * RELENG_5_0_0_RELEASE * RELENG_5_0 I don't want CURRENT, so it has to be one of these, I suppose. But I can't find anything on the net that tells me exactly what each branch is. What you want is RELENG_5, which doesn't exist yet. It will be created when 5.x is considered to be the new -STABLE. Until then you can either follow -CURRENT (which is the branch leading up to the next 5.x release just as RELENG_4 is the branch leading up to the next 4.x release) or RELENG_5_2 (which is 5.2.1-RELEASE + important bugfixes) As for what the other tags are: RELENG_5_1 and RELENG_5_0 are as RELENG_5_2 except for 5.1-release and 5.0-release respectively - little reason to use them. The RELENG_5_x_BP tags are branches but static tags marking the place where the RELENG_5_x branch was created from HEAD. RELENG_5_x_y_RELEASE marks the code for 5.x.y-release, and also doesn't change. There is little reason to use either of those unless you for some reason want the exact code that went into a relase. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 04:05 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: What you want is RELENG_5, which doesn't exist yet. It will be created when 5.x is considered to be the new -STABLE. Until then you can either follow -CURRENT (which is the branch leading up to the next 5.x release just as RELENG_4 is the branch leading up to the next 4.x release) or RELENG_5_2 (which is 5.2.1-RELEASE + important bugfixes) As for what the other tags are: RELENG_5_1 and RELENG_5_0 are as RELENG_5_2 except for 5.1-release and 5.0-release respectively - little reason to use them. The RELENG_5_x_BP tags are branches but static tags marking the place where the RELENG_5_x branch was created from HEAD. RELENG_5_x_y_RELEASE marks the code for 5.x.y-release, and also doesn't change. There is little reason to use either of those unless you for some reason want the exact code that went into a relase. I was trying to install ports using /stand/sysinstall and it was complaining that 5.2-CURRENT didn't exist on any of the ftp mirrors i was trying and I should change to an appropriate release in the 'Options' menu. What should this be if I have 5.2.1 installed and want to track -CURRENT? Thanks. -- Cheers, Trey --- I might repeat to myself slowly and soothingly, a list of quotations beautiful from minds profound - if I can remember any of the damn things. -- Dorothy Parker 10:19pm up 23:55, 3 users, load average: 0.29, 0.27, 0.31 Linux linux 2.6.5-7.95-default #1 Thu Jul 1 15:23:45 UTC 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
dns/sendmail/resolve problems...
On tao sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. Anybody know why? thanks garY -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WPC11 ver 3 or bust...
Hey all, I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is recognized, and I can even assign IP addresses and such, but it never associates to my wireless network, even if I set ssid, channel, media, etc, manually. If I pull the card out, I get the following message in my logfile: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear I'm at the point where I'm thinking of going back to 4.9 (well, 4.10 now) so that I can use wifi again. The only reason I went to 5.2.1 was for better power management, but that doesn't really do anything for me anyways. If I can't get this to work within the next day or so, I'm going to just reinstall 4.x. Thanks for your help! Eric Found on Conan O'Brian: Children's books written by celebrities; By Mel Gibson: Jesus Christ and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. - Keep your powder dry and your pecker hard and the world WILL turn. - Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dns/sendmail/resolve problems...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kline Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 9:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dns/sendmail/resolve problems... On tao sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. Anybody know why? thanks garY Sounds like that's a resovler issue. Make sure tao is able to resovle hostnames correctly. Fixing an issue with the nameserver has always fixed this on my side. Hope this helps. Eric ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WPC11 ver 3 or bust...
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 09:23 pm, Eric Crist wrote: Hey all, I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is recognized, and I can even assign IP addresses and such, but it never associates to my wireless network, even if I set ssid, channel, media, etc, manually. If I pull the card out, I get the following message in my logfile: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear I'm at the point where I'm thinking of going back to 4.9 (well, 4.10 now) so that I can use wifi again. The only reason I went to 5.2.1 was for better power management, but that doesn't really do anything for me anyways. If I can't get this to work within the next day or so, I'm going to just reinstall 4.x. Thanks for your help! Eric How are you configuring the wireless card? I'm using the same card on 5.2.1 Release on a Dell Inspiron 8100. The only change I had to make to the scripts I used on FreeBSD 4.10 was to delete: authmode shared (I don't know why the change was needed since the wireless lan and access point stayed the same.) Here's the contents of the script (I've changed the addresses and codes): ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid mywan nwkey 0x1234567890 #(everything above should be on one line) route add default 192.168.0.1 echo domain cablelynx.com /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 24.204.0.4 /etc/resolv.conf echo nameserver 24.204.0.5 /etc/resolv.conf echo wi0 If you try the script above and still get the error message, try adding the following to the beginning of the script so the script gets a clean start on the card: ifconfig wi0 remove Best of luck, Andrew Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peace
Change the World with Peace and Prosperity 10-Million Urgent Peace letters to Head of States, UN, Parliaments, Political Parties, TV News Channels,International Newspapers, Magazines, Universities, Think tanks, AmnestyInternational and Welfare NGOs, all over the WorldSubject: Friendship, Progress and Prosperity for peace throughout theWorldI Agha Dilbar Founder International Revolution Movement have sent10-Million research Peace Letters to International Community from 11September 2001 till today about War on Terror.Our NGO International Revolution Movement has 3-Principles, Friendship,Progress and Prosperity all over the World. Our NGO s programmed is for TheWelfare of International Community and to save the Human Being from 3rdWorld War and World Terrorism.I Agha Dilbar have a Great Peace Plan for Kashmir, Afghanistan,Chechnya,Middle East and Iraq to stop and eliminate Suicidal Bomb Attacks allOverThe World. Some Powerful Underground Groups want to begin 3rd World WarForTheir worst intentions.World should remember that religion Islam is a religion of Peace,Security,Fraternity and Love. We Muslims are not concerned with any sort of Terrorism;Terrorists are only using the name of Islam. Likewise people using theNameOf Islam to pretence are not Muslims. They are only Terrorists.I, Agha Dilbar on emergency ground want to present solid suggestions toInternational Community, regarding their policies on War againstTerrorism,Can be saved from Economic Crisis, I should be given a chance to makeOpenSpeech and Dialogue, on the leading TV News Channels to eliminatePoverty,Unemployment and Lawlessness at International level.I am warning the International Community that according to my previousResearch spread over a period of 2-years; it is evident that sufficientIntentional or unintentional efforts have not been made to eradicateTheRoot Causes of Terrorism in all its forms and manifestations (SuicideBombing and destructive tendencies). As a result thereof it is quitePossible that there may be dramatic hundred times Increase in theIncidencesOf Terrorism and Suicide Bombing in the near future. For the sake ofWorldPeace, I therefore request the International Community to provide me anOpportunity to explain to them, the root causes of World Terrorism andSuicide Bombings as to take bold steps to put an end to its basicCauses. InNutshell instead of using Brute Force, try to solve the matter throughTableTalk. I should convince those who are on the wrong track that they areTheirWell - wisher and are interested to develop Friendship for mutualProgressServices, I please beGiven a chance of Official Visit to Interested Countries forElaborating myGreat Peace Plan before the Head of States and other concerned HigherAuthorities.Regards Please NoteDonate Funds for International Peace CampaignFor conveying massage of Peace through Friendship, Progress andProsperity byInternational Revolution Movement in a better way 1000 times more, weNeedFunds on Urgent Bases. Please send your Donations toBank account: Allied Bank of Pakistan, LahoreBranch: ABL, Allama Iqbal Town, Lahore-0688Account: Agha DilbarAccount No.001100-5809-2Agha Dilbar founderInternational Revolution Movement64-neelum, Allama Iqbal Town, Lahore (Pakistan)Ph: 0092-42-7830084, Mobile: 0300-4370258E-mail Thanks for using this service.Please E-mail these peace letters to your friends,For the welfare of Humanity.Thank you for your participation. We appreciate your contribution forHumanity(Live with Dignity and Dye with Grace. Guide Line from Agha Dilbar)Agha Dilbars Urgent Peace Letter No.2Subject: Agha Dilbar request for a chance of Open Speech and DialogueToWorld Community for Peace. We want Peace not War.I Agha Dilbar have a Great Peace Plan for the World Community. This isAGreat treasure for Humanity. After following my Great Peace Plan, WarOnTerror will fight through UN Principles. I request to all the Head ofStates, UN, Parliaments, Political Parties, TV News Channels,InternationalNewspapers and Magazines, Think Tanks, Universities, AmnestyInternational,And Welfare NGO s, Please invite me in your Countries, Institutions, TVShows, Media Forums to give me a chance of Open Speech and DialogueAbout myGreat Peace Plan. Thanks.I am sure that my Great Peace Plan will protect the Impending 3rd worldWar.After following the instructions contained in my Great Peace Plan,People ofThe World become Prosperous and Developed according to the latestScientificEra.I Agha Dilbar have a Great Peace Plan, which depends upon, Friendship,Progress and Prosperity throughout the World. I hope that WorldCommunityWill favor my Great Peace Plan quickly. Any question about my GreatPeacePlan? Write directly to me.Thanks and Regards E-mail Agha Dilbars Urgent Peace Letter No. 3Subject: Make the UN Peace Force strongest force of the World to saveTheWorld coming from on 3rd World War and State TerrorismI Agha Dilbar am writing the
Re: Turning off submission (587) port
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, Chris wrote: Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. -- Best regards, Chris From sendmail Cookbook I have this example (10.2) for sendmail.mc: FEATURE(`no_default_msa') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`NAME=MSA, Port=587, Addr=127.0.0.1, M=E') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`NAME=MTA, Addr=127.0.0.1') MASQUERADE_AS(`chef.whoareyou.com') The MASQUERAD_AS feature in this example is only used if you want replies to mils sent to a server with a active SMTP port. Change to /etc/mail, run make stop, make all, make install, make start Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Devices not being built
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devices not being built On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wi reless card. I've configured and built the kernel with the followings devices device wlan# 802.11 support device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. device awi # BayStack 660 and others device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. The problem is that no devices are being built in /dev for the above. Wh at am I doing wrong? Thanks Mike Sacauskis 5.2.1 uses devfs by default. A device won't get created in the devfs filesystem unless a driver registers it. Do you actually have devices physically installed in the machine that are supported by each of those drivers? Nathan -- PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD8527E49 I have a WMP card and I thought that the an driver was supposed to work for that. I threw in the others to see if they would show up. Always keep the list copied on replies. I didn't see any Linksys wireless cards explicitly listed in the 5.2.1 hardware notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware-i386.html#AEN815 Some searches on the web are sure to turn up some pages about others trying to get that and similar cards to work with FreeBSD. Nathan -- PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD8527E49 Thanks Thanks I'll check the sites out. I did some net searching and was under the impression some people got the WMP11 going with the an driver. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: allowing users to mount cdrom again
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:41:59 +0200, Grant Speelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and wanted to try it for myself I did the follow : added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to include the user restarted freebsd (It's amazing what a restart does for me sometimes) /dev is not a real filesystem. Once you reboot, changes are lost. You would want to put permissions in /etc/devfs.conf so it's more permanent. Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
