Re: FreeBSD based router ...
small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. 486 hardware with three NICs, a CF drive, and run off of a few watts of DC power tend not to free. that's the adventage. but edimax 6104K router with 5 ethernets running netbsd is both cheaper smaller and faster with it's 175Mhz 2 instr/cycle MIPS CPU. 16MB RAM+2MB flash isn't much but enough to fit. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Radel > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 5:24 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD based router ... > > > Tom Van Looy wrote: > > > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>> been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall > >> small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. > > > > No it's not, they consume electricity. Soekris boxes are designed for > > low-power. I had a 4501 and now have a 5501. > > And, other than in hobbyist's private networks and things built with > volunteer labor, there are generally labor costs. Rummaging in the junk > pile can get pretty expensive if you have to pay somebody to do it > That really depends on both the organization and the worker and what their job is and a lot of other things. For example, I manage people at an ISP. Their jobs are to run the network and answer customer support calls. If they are doing their jobs then the ISP runs well and we don't get many support calls. Thus some of their time they will be sitting idle. I don't adjust their job descriptions to permanently increase the amount of work they do because I don't want them tied up doing more work when a customer does call for support, and also because it is punishing them for doing a good job in the first place. Yet I don't want them sitting around playing computer games while they are waiting for a support call, either. In this case, if they are working on building some junk computer into a router then it is not critical work that they cannot set down immediately at any time if a customer calls. Yet it also keeps them busy and out of trouble, and contributes something to the business. And it teaches them something so their brains don't rot. My labor costs are going to be the same whether they are resurrecting some old PC or whether they are sitting twiddling their thumbs, so now please explain to me how it is that I am incurring expense paying someone to rummage in a junk pile? And there are also the cases of the government organizations who have money budgeted to upgrades but not capital expenses, and every expense over $500 must be justified to the nth degree. In those organizations you can spend $2K USD without seeking second level approval if you write a series of PO's for under $500 each, getting a hard disk on one, a power supply on another, a motherboard on a third, etc. But if you try to simply buy a PC all put together for less money you will get it slapped down. Dilbert even had a series of cartoons about this, one of the few series I've read that I didn't think was funny, as it simply described reality for a lot of people. So, yeah, there are a lot of organizations that do not function nice and neat like it says they should in the MBA courses. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
usb kbd and ums problem
I have a problem with my newly installed Freebsd6.3. I use USB keyboard and mouse, when start it all goes well, but after system boot process initalize usb2 controllers, both my keyboard and mouse disappear. I have to physically unplug them and plug them in again to use them. I have ums_load="YES" and ukbd_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf, but not seems to solve the issue. PS. when I plug both keyboard and mouse into an external usb hub, it works seamlessly. Any ideas? -- Lei http://icnpro.com/datacentre/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: amd64 ?!
Outback Dingo wrote: I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box, but they installed AMD64 instead *Correctly* installed. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: amd64 ?!
I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box, but they installed AMD64 instead On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Wojciech Puchar < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is >> identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? >> > > because this intel CPU is 64-bit AMD compatible (x86-64 standard). > the rules changed and now intel make AMD-compatible CPUs > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Tom Van Looy wrote: Wojciech Puchar wrote: been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. No it's not, they consume electricity. Soekris boxes are designed for low-power. I had a 4501 and now have a 5501. And, other than in hobbyist's private networks and things built with volunteer labor, there are generally labor costs. Rummaging in the junk pile can get pretty expensive if you have to pay somebody to do it --Jon Radel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site?
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Kelly Jones wrote: I begrudgingly use a Windows SharePoint server at a customer's request. I'd like to automate (command-line) updating and creating documents, lists, etc. Is there a Unix tool that does this? I know SharePoint has an "API", which basically spoofs the GET/POST calls that your browser would make(?). Has anyone written a Unix command-line tool (or Perl module, etc) that abstracts this? >>> >>> Is this what you want? >>> >>> http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ >>> >>> Chris >> >> If you want to use some/many/most of the core utils on Windows, you'll >> be much better off with http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net >> >> unxutils seems pretty moribund, and I have not been successful >> downloading the updates from that site for a while. >> >> Kurt > > I'll have a look at these, thanks for the suggestion. I have to say though > the unxutils commands that I have used work perfectly well despite their > age, don't require cygwin and don't do silly registry things on windows. I > need this as I'm using them on a work computer which I am not allowed to > install software on :P > > Chris The unxutils work well, but the gnuwin32 stuff is a bit more current, and more complete. They don't require any registry fiddling nor extra DLLs, either, just like the unxutils stuff. I stick them in a directory, and set my path up with that. Works well for me, anyway. HTH, Kurt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site?
Kurt Buff wrote: On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kelly Jones wrote: I begrudgingly use a Windows SharePoint server at a customer's request. I'd like to automate (command-line) updating and creating documents, lists, etc. Is there a Unix tool that does this? I know SharePoint has an "API", which basically spoofs the GET/POST calls that your browser would make(?). Has anyone written a Unix command-line tool (or Perl module, etc) that abstracts this? Is this what you want? http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ Chris If you want to use some/many/most of the core utils on Windows, you'll be much better off with http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net unxutils seems pretty moribund, and I have not been successful downloading the updates from that site for a while. Kurt I'll have a look at these, thanks for the suggestion. I have to say though the unxutils commands that I have used work perfectly well despite their age, don't require cygwin and don't do silly registry things on windows. I need this as I'm using them on a work computer which I am not allowed to install software on :P Chris No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1469 - Release Date: 5/27/2008 1:25 PM ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Kernel Panic: isp - page fault while in kernel mode
Greg Himes wrote: Hello All, Last week, one half of my dual port Qlogic fibre channel interface started causing a page fault panic while probing the second port at boot time. I was able to get the system back up by disabling the BIOS on the second port. The system still sees the 2nd port, but politely displays a few errors, then continues on. This all started after I powered the system down for maintenance. System is running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 What is the proper way to help debug this problem? See the developers handbook. Kris P.S. And don't do this, you're crippling your network: WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
help with options BRIDGE in freebsd 7.0
I'd really appreciate if someone can shed some light on this for me. I'm attempting to build a layer2 sniffer using dummynet and ipfw but I'm having some problems building the new kernel with "options BRIDGE". It errors out with the message below. Any suggestions? -cp lois# /usr/sbin/config LOIS LOIS: unknown option "BRIDGE" freebsd version = 7.0 lois# more LOIS | grep IP options IPSEC options IPSEC_FILTERTUNNEL options IPSEC_DEBUG options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPDIVERT options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG lois# more LOIS | grep BR options NETGRAPH_BRIDGE options BRIDGE lois# more LOIS | grep DUM options DUMMYNET lois# ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Kernel Panic: isp - page fault while in kernel mode
Hello All, Last week, one half of my dual port Qlogic fibre channel interface started causing a page fault panic while probing the second port at boot time. I was able to get the system back up by disabling the BIOS on the second port. The system still sees the 2nd port, but politely displays a few errors, then continues on. This all started after I powered the system down for maintenance. System is running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 What is the proper way to help debug this problem? Listed below is the boot info: /boot/kernel/acpi.ko text=0x44e84 data=0x24e0+0x1b8c syms=[0x4+0x7dc0 +0x4+0xab62] 786428K of memory above 4GB ignored Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #11: Fri Apr 11 13:25:41 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAACO WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. module_register: module pci/bce already exists! Module pci/bce failed to register: 17 module_register: module bce/miibus already exists! Module bce/miibus failed to register: 17 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5160 @ 3.00GHz (3000.13-MHz 686- class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0x4e3bd,DCA> AMD Features=0x2000 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 3487916032 (3326 MB) avail memory = 3408932864 (3251 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Apr 11 2008 13:25:27) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x908-0x90b on acpi0 acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 0.0 on pci4 pci5: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: on pcib3 pcib4: at device 0.0 on pci6 pci7: on pcib4 bce0: mem 0xfa00-0xfbff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci7 miibus0: on bce0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 1000baseSX-FDX, auto bce0: Ethernet address: 00:17:a4:77:00:0a bce0: [GIANT-LOCKED] bce0: ASIC (0x57081021); Rev (B2); Bus (PCI-X, 64-bit, 133MHz); F/W (0x01090605); Flags( MSI ) pcib5: at device 1.0 on pci5 pci8: on pcib5 pcib6: at device 0.3 on pci4 pci9: on pcib6 pcib7: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci10: on pcib7 pcib8: at device 0.0 on pci10 pci11: on pcib8 pcib9: at device 4.0 on pci11 pci12: on pcib9 ciss0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xfdb8-0xfdbf,0xfdb7-0xfdb77fff irq 18 at device 8.0 on pci11 ciss0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcib10: at device 4.0 on pci0 pci13: on pcib10 ciss1: port 0x5000-0x50ff mem 0xfdd0-0xfddf,0xfdcf-0xfdcf0fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci13 ciss1: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcib11: at device 5.0 on pci0 pci16: on pcib11 pcib12: at device 0.0 on pci16 pci17: on pcib12 bge0: mem 0xfdef-0xfdef,0xfdee-0xfdee irq 18 at device 4.0 on pci17 bge0: Ethernet address: 00:17:a4:77:00:24 bge0: [GIANT-LOCKED] bge1: mem 0xfded-0xfded,0xfdec-0xfdec irq 19 at device 4.1 on pci17 bge1: Ethernet address: 00:17:a4:77:00:26 bge1: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcib13: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci19: on pcib13 isp0: port 0x6000-0x60ff mem 0xfdff-0xfdff3fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci19 isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED] isp0: Board Type 2422, Chip Revision 0x2, resident F/W Revision 4.0.70 isp1: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xfdfe-0xfdfe3fff irq 16 at device 0.1 on pci19 isp1: [GIANT-LOCKED] Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x2c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc045f1ea stack pointer = 0x28:0xc1020660 frame pointer = 0x28:0xc1020660 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 Uptime: 1s Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On May 28, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: For small and medium sized enterprises that really just need firewall, NAT, static routing and are fine with 100Mb ether on the router, I've been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. 486 hardware with three NICs, a CF drive, and run off of a few watts of DC power tend not to free. But of course a free 486 box may very well fit your needs. Cheers, -j ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Ovens wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: >> I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, >> except with >> him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he >> plugged it in. I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that >> resets his usb >> buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly >> detected, but >> he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him. I don't have >> something >> like that to experiment with. >> >> With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a >> direct-access disk devide #2 being detected. The next step is to >> figure oout >> what kind of formatting you have. Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to >> where it has >> partitions, so do this (as root): "/sbin/fdisk /dev/da2", and in >> fdisk, give the >> 'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions. >> Likely it's >> either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a >> FreeBSD >> one. Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount >> command next, >> to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the >> disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk). >> > > Hi Chuck, > > The next line in my post after where you snipped was: > > (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr > on the other system) Yeah, I don't even have a good excuse, that was extremely ill done of me. I guess I was trying to do something quickly while I was really thinking of other USB things, and walked into that. It's NOT the kind of usb that I've been working on either, I've been heavily into HID stuff, and that's totally different than a disk thing. If it's a device driver level problem, and it sure seems that way to me, I can't honestly offer you much, even if I had it here, I would approach it slowly. I think I will drop out of this one, Mark, and contemplate my navel a bit. I'm a bit embarrassed about that, could you tell? > > It contains a running FBSD 7.0 system - it's out of a spare box I was > using for testing and it mounts/reads/writes fine using the other USB > enclosure I borrowed. There's just something screwy about the enclosure > I've bought (typical eh?) > > Regards, > > Mark > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIPddYz62J6PPcoOkRArErAJ9an6NsIja5B9gTlZQvOIL5xslmWwCgl7Rb Mq9WW70l28IpnkYnsNI+EAU= =MY/q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in Dell PE2950?
In the last episode (May 28), Rob said: > VeeJay wrote: > > Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in > > Dell PE2950? > > from man bge: > > X v1.0 compliant. It supports IP, TCP and UDP checksum offload > for both receive and transmit, multiple RX and TX DMA rings for > QoS applications, rules-based receive filtering, and VLAN tag > stripping/insertion as well ( i.e. the bge driver does not support TCP data offload ) The embedded NIC in the 2950 is a BCM5708, however, which is handled by the bce driver, and the if_bce.c source has references to TSO, so it might be supported. Best way to find out is to run "ifconfig -m" and see whether TSO4 is listed in the capabilities line for your nic. Then again, a PE2950 should be able to saturate a gigabit NIC quite easily even without any offloading. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: amd64 ?!
so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? because this intel CPU is 64-bit AMD compatible (x86-64 standard). the rules changed and now intel make AMD-compatible CPUs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: amd64 ?!
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:56:26PM -0400, kalin m wrote: > hi all... > > i have dilemma. > > i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i > mentioned that it should be 64 bit. > now they when i get into the machine i get: > srv391# uname -a > FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun > Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz > K8-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 > > Features=0xbfebfbff > > Features2=0xce33d> > AMD Features=0x20100800 > AMD Features2=0x1 > > > so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is > identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? Looks fine to me. It is obviously the amd64 version of FreeBSD (which is 64-bit), which works just fine on that Intel CPU since all Intel's recent CPUs implement the AMD64 (aka x86-64) architecture. Intel calls it EM64T (unless they have changed it again) instead of AMD64, but it is the same thing. -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: amd64 ?!
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:56:26PM -0400, kalin m wrote: > hi all... > > i have dilemma. > > i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i > mentioned that it should be 64 bit. > now they when i get into the machine i get: > srv391# uname -a > FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun > Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz K8-class > CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 > AMD Features=0x20100800 > AMD Features2=0x1 > > so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is > identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? Well, "amd64" is the name FreeBSD uses for the 64-bit architecture built by AMD as en extension of the 32-bit x86 architecture. Intel later made it's chips compatible because it's own 64-bit architecture IA64 was more or less a dud. This architecture is also known as x86_64. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgpVYYF9Bt7j7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: amd64 ?!
kalin m wrote: hi all... i have dilemma. i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i mentioned that it should be 64 bit. now they when i get into the machine i get: srv391# uname -a FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xce33d> AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? amd64 is the architecture name (since it was invented by AMD; just like i686 is named after Intel even if you are running CPU implementations by amd, cyrix, etc). Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
amd64 ?!
hi all... i have dilemma. i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i mentioned that it should be 64 bit. now they when i get into the machine i get: srv391# uname -a FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xce33d> AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is identifying itself as amd64 and not i686? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Wojciech Puchar wrote: been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. No it's not, they consume electricity. Soekris boxes are designed for low-power. I had a 4501 and now have a 5501. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: On May 28, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Rob wrote: These guys have a 2 or 4 port nic for < $100: http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm For small and medium sized enterprises that really just need firewall, NAT, static routing and are fine with 100Mb ether on the router, I've been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall NETASQ firewalls also uses FreeBSD on their devices. But, the the question was "routers". I don't know if NETASQ has routers. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
Roland Smith wrote: Yes; $ locate atausb /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb/Makefile (This is on 7-STABLE) Ah, so it's not built by default! Presumably, it would not work with other usb mass storage devices like memory sticks or phones? It should work with all usb mass storage devices, I think. It just seems to be tied into the ata subsystem instead of into the scsi subsystem via atapicam. Great, I'll try it out and let you know how it goes. Thanks. Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:37:55PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: >> >> You could try using the atausb driver instead of umass. Unfortunately it >> doesn't have a manpage yet, but you have to unload umass if you want to >> use atausb. >> > > Thanks Roland, but I can't find atausb in either 6.3 or 7.0 - is it a kld > module? Yes; $ locate atausb /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atausb/Makefile (This is on 7-STABLE) > Presumably, it would not work with other usb mass storage devices like > memory sticks or phones? It should work with all usb mass storage devices, I think. It just seems to be tied into the ata subsystem instead of into the scsi subsystem via atapicam. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgpeTlVDInCnO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
For small and medium sized enterprises that really just need firewall, NAT, static routing and are fine with 100Mb ether on the router, I've been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall http://m0n0.ch/wall/ or pfsense http://www.pfsense.com/ both FreeBSD based. small but expensive. used 486-pentium hardware is for free. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in Dell PE2950?
VeeJay wrote: Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in Dell PE2950? from man bge: X v1.0 compliant. It supports IP, TCP and UDP checksum offload for both receive and transmit, multiple RX and TX DMA rings for QoS applications, rules-based receive filtering, and VLAN tag stripping/insertion as well -R ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
perl 5.10 port
Hello. I'm interesting when perl 5.10 will be available in freebsd ports? Always Want to ask same question about qt4.4. -- Regards, Nickolay D. Hodyunya. mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
Roland Smith wrote: You could try using the atausb driver instead of umass. Unfortunately it doesn't have a manpage yet, but you have to unload umass if you want to use atausb. Thanks Roland, but I can't find atausb in either 6.3 or 7.0 - is it a kld module? Presumably, it would not work with other usb mass storage devices like memory sticks or phones? Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > Bought an external USB HD enclosure but it doesn't work under FreeBSD. > > Under FreeBSD-6.3-STABLE: > > umass0: Super Top USB 2.0 IDE DEVICE, rev 2.00/2.01, addr 2 > da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da2: 40.000MB/s transfers > da2: 38172MB (78177792 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4866C) > > # mount /dev/da2s1f /mnt > # ls /mnt > # > > (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr on > the other system) > > So although it mounts, nothing is visible. You could try using the atausb driver instead of umass. Unfortunately it doesn't have a manpage yet, but you have to unload umass if you want to use atausb. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgpLn4a6XYYeb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in Dell PE2950?
Hi guys Any clue? Does FreeBSD supports TCP Offload Engine (TOE) from Broadcom in Dell PE2950? -- Thanks! BR / vj ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
> > Chuck Robey wrote: > > I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, except > > with > > him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he > > plugged it in. I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that resets > > his usb > > buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly > > detected, but > > he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him. I don't have > > something > > like that to experiment with. > > > > With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a > > direct-access disk devide #2 being detected. The next step is to figure > > oout > > what kind of formatting you have. Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to where > > it has > > partitions, so do this (as root): "/sbin/fdisk /dev/da2", and in fdisk, > > give the > > 'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions. Likely > > it's > > either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a > > FreeBSD > > one. Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount command > > next, > > to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the > > disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk). > > > > Hi Chuck, > > The next line in my post after where you snipped was: > > (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr > on the other system) > > It contains a running FBSD 7.0 system - it's out of a spare box I was > using for testing and it mounts/reads/writes fine using the other USB > enclosure I borrowed. There's just something screwy about the enclosure > I've bought (typical eh?) > Sounds like issues I had with a USB stick that I had from a 5.4 system and tried to put onto a 7.0 system. (Posted in freebsd-current early April.)I had data integrity issues, couldn't re-format it on the new system, would mount but as soon as I used it the kernel would panic, etc. Bring it back to the 5.4 system, things were peachy. Tuc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
Mark Ovens wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, except with
him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he
plugged it in. I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that resets his usb
buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly detected, but
he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him. I don't have something
like that to experiment with.
With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a
direct-access disk devide #2 being detected. The next step is to figure oout
what kind of formatting you have. Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to where it has
partitions, so do this (as root): "/sbin/fdisk /dev/da2", and in fdisk, give the
'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions. Likely it's
either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a FreeBSD
one. Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount command next,
to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the
disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk).
Hi Chuck,
The next line in my post after where you snipped was:
(The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr
on the other system)
It contains a running FBSD 7.0 system - it's out of a spare box I was
using for testing and it mounts/reads/writes fine using the other USB
enclosure I borrowed. There's just something screwy about the enclosure
I've bought (typical eh?)
Forgot to add the output of fdisk.
/home/mark{104}# /sbin/fdisk /dev/da2
*** Working on device /dev/da2 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=4866 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl)
Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1
parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
cylinders=4866 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl)
Media sector size is 512
Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1
Information from DOS bootblock is:
The data for partition 1 is:
sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
start 63, size 78172227 (38170 Meg), flag 80 (active)
beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1;
end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63
The data for partition 2 is:
The data for partition 3 is:
The data for partition 4 is:
/home/mark{105}#
Regards,
Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On May 28, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Rob wrote: These guys have a 2 or 4 port nic for < $100: http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm For small and medium sized enterprises that really just need firewall, NAT, static routing and are fine with 100Mb ether on the router, I've been happy with using soekris net48XX boxes using m0n0wall http://m0n0.ch/wall/ or pfsense http://www.pfsense.com/ both FreeBSD based. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
Chuck Robey wrote: I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, except with him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he plugged it in. I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that resets his usb buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly detected, but he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him. I don't have something like that to experiment with. With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a direct-access disk devide #2 being detected. The next step is to figure oout what kind of formatting you have. Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to where it has partitions, so do this (as root): "/sbin/fdisk /dev/da2", and in fdisk, give the 'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions. Likely it's either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a FreeBSD one. Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount command next, to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk). Hi Chuck, The next line in my post after where you snipped was: (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr on the other system) It contains a running FBSD 7.0 system - it's out of a spare box I was using for testing and it mounts/reads/writes fine using the other USB enclosure I borrowed. There's just something screwy about the enclosure I've bought (typical eh?) Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: External USB disk won't mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Ovens wrote: > Bought an external USB HD enclosure but it doesn't work under FreeBSD. > > Under FreeBSD-6.3-STABLE: > > umass0: Super Top USB 2.0 IDE DEVICE, rev 2.00/2.01, addr 2 > da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da2: 40.000MB/s transfers > da2: 38172MB (78177792 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4866C) > > # mount /dev/da2s1f /mnt > # ls /mnt I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, except with him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he plugged it in. I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that resets his usb buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly detected, but he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him. I don't have something like that to experiment with. With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a direct-access disk devide #2 being detected. The next step is to figure oout what kind of formatting you have. Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to where it has partitions, so do this (as root): "/sbin/fdisk /dev/da2", and in fdisk, give the 'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions. Likely it's either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a FreeBSD one. Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount command next, to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk). Probably the right thing to do is to reply here with the results of the fdisk, then whoever jumps on it first can give you the right thing to do next. I'm not going to try to tell you all the possible ways to go at this point, not without that. > # > > (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr > on the other system) > > So although it mounts, nothing is visible. > > After a few minutes this happens: > > umass0: at uhub3 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > (da2:dead_sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x8, scsi > status == 0x0 > (da2:dead_sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry > umass0: detached > > Tried it under 7.0-RELEASE and it's even worse - it crashes the kernel with > > Fatal Trap 12: page fault in kernel mode. (forget the exact wording of > the message, but it's definitely Fatal Trap 12). > > So is this just a case of the device not complying with USB standards - > the manufacturer just tests it under Windows and that's good enough - or > is there a way to solve this? > > I can confirm that the disk is good as I borrowed another enclosure to > try and that works as expected. > > Regards, > > Mark > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIPaaDz62J6PPcoOkRAhNRAJ0TM+Izyjj1n+tMD8YAKc0XALk6TwCdHo/R uZES2fTDXjaG3v+GXSZpglg= =lHgf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
External USB disk won't mount
Bought an external USB HD enclosure but it doesn't work under FreeBSD. Under FreeBSD-6.3-STABLE: umass0: Super Top USB 2.0 IDE DEVICE, rev 2.00/2.01, addr 2 da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da2: 40.000MB/s transfers da2: 38172MB (78177792 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4866C) # mount /dev/da2s1f /mnt # ls /mnt # (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr on the other system) So although it mounts, nothing is visible. After a few minutes this happens: umass0: at uhub3 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device (da2:dead_sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x8, scsi status == 0x0 (da2:dead_sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry umass0: detached Tried it under 7.0-RELEASE and it's even worse - it crashes the kernel with Fatal Trap 12: page fault in kernel mode. (forget the exact wording of the message, but it's definitely Fatal Trap 12). So is this just a case of the device not complying with USB standards - the manufacturer just tests it under Windows and that's good enough - or is there a way to solve this? I can confirm that the disk is good as I borrowed another enclosure to try and that works as expected. Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
They are very expensive. A Juniper is not based on FreeBSD. It uses FreeBSD as the control interface. The actual routing happens in specialized ASICS that Juniper custom-builds. good for multiple gigabits traffic or more. for lower speed - not worth of. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
These guys have a 2 or 4 port nic for < $100: http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm Try Ebay for the Adaptec ANA-6944-TX. It's a 4 port based on the old DEC chipset (de driver) Usual can be had for <= $10. but prepare for problems connecting this with other devices. usually works well with switches, but not with everything. speed negotiation is broken. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll packet headers find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might for 10Gbe ports - yes. for lower speed no. YMMV, HTH, HAND. I don't need that many Ethernet ports, but I do need most of those PCI slots. I was unable to locate a box with more than four slots and a warranty that was acceptable to our Production group. I'm still not sure about the warranty or that we can buy it in a case with power supply. But at least I have a vector to resume my search. Thanks, Bob McConnell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. Six slots X quad-port network cards = 24 interfaces. If you need more than that, it's probably worth investing in specialized hard-/software. Robert Huff Where did you find a box with six slots? in older ones - quite common. in new machines it's a problem, not old ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
(pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. not true. 5 PCI slots isn't uncommon+ISA slots. ISA slot is OK for video card (easy to find in scraps ;). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry B. > Altzman > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:31 AM > To: Erik Trulsson > Cc: Bob McConnell; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD based router ... > > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Erik Trulsson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Putting a total of 6 quad-port NICs on a single PCI-bus would > totally swamp > > that bus though, so if one were to actually use so many NICs I > would rather > > recommend e.g. the Asus P5BP-E/4L motherboard. It has 3 PCI slots and 3 > > PCI-E slots in addition to the four gigabit LAN ports included on the > > motherboard - so you can get a total of 28 ports if you fully > populate all > > slots with quad-port NICs (not counting any USB-connected > ethernet ports one > > might add.) It also has built-in graphics so one does not need to waste > > one slot on a graphics card.) > > And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* > decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a > switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll > find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might > actually be on to something, there, and that ASICs might actually be > worth what you paid for them. > If it's purely ethernet-to-ethernet routing, and a lot of ethernet ports, then he should check into the layer-3 switches on the market and see if they will work for him. Much cheaper than a "real router" Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Giorgos > Keramidas > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:38 PM > To: Matthew Donovan > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD based router ... > > > On Tue, 27 May 2008 22:28:35 -0400, Matthew Donovan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:56:55PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router > based off of FreeBSD? > > > > Juniptor makes routers based on freebsd. Sorry for the spelling really > > it's incorrect for the company name but you can just look up theri > > site if you want to pay for it really good from what I have heard. > > The correct spelling of the name is 'Juniper'. > > You are right of course. Juniper develops high-end routers. > They're very very good at it too :) > They are very expensive. A Juniper is not based on FreeBSD. It uses FreeBSD as the control interface. The actual routing happens in specialized ASICS that Juniper custom-builds. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Bob McConnell wrote: I don't need that many Ethernet ports, but I do need most of those PCI slots. I was unable to locate a box with more than four slots and a warranty that was acceptable to our Production group. I'm still not sure about the warranty or that we can buy it in a case with power supply. These guys have a 2 or 4 port nic for < $100: http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm Try Ebay for the Adaptec ANA-6944-TX. It's a 4 port based on the old DEC chipset (de driver) Usual can be had for <= $10. This is a good article on some free-ware packages you might like to start from: http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/ -R ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Survive from DDoS
I think the size and the fact that his ISP could not filter this indicates that the problem cannot be solved locally. You can do all the blocking on your end you want, but they can (and did) still saturate links ahead of you. Your ISP (or even their uplink, I'm guessing your ISP was also pretty affected by this attack if they couldn't filter it) needs to step up to bat in times like this. -Patrick 2008/5/28 Ivailo Tanusheff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > What I wanted to say was to use pf, not ipf. You may use something like > this: > > table persist > block log quick from > > # sshspammer > # more than 6 ssh attempts in 15 seconds will be blocked ;) > pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port ssh keep state > (max-src-conn 10, max-src-conn-rate 6/15, overload flush > global) > > which I use for ssh flood protection or brute force attacks. You have to > change the syntax to use it for DNS. > Hope this will help you. > > Regards, > > Ivailo Tanusheff > > > > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 28.05.2008 11:34 > > To > Ivailo Tanusheff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject > Re: Survive from DDoS > > > > > > > Dear Ivailo, > > thank you for your response. I am using ipfw to limit all packets for > all open port in my server. But the packet size was 600 Mbps which could > not filtered by our ISP. > > Ivailo Tanusheff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > you may use ipf to drop packets from the attacking host I suppose. Or > even > > limit the packets to the specified port. > > > > Regards, > > > > Ivailo Tanusheff > > > > > > > > > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 28.05.2008 05:01 > > > > To > > "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > > cc > > > > Subject > > Survive from DDoS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > yesterday, our shell server was attack and server immeditiately reboot. > > I checked logs, it likes UDP flood with destination port 53. Is there > > any way how to survive from this kind attack? Also, is there any > > url/resources to improve our shell server? > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen > > > > > > ___ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SOS Kosovo
Dear ladies and gentlemen please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Fatan Kercagu and I am at first year of my studies at the Economic Faculty here at Prishtina University. I am unable to continue my studies because of financial reasons therefore I would ask you hereby for your possible financial assistance as I am unable to continue studies on my own. Your assistance can be as little as possible but to me it will be big because it would enable me to create a healthy family future, your assistance would open doors to me and make me become an economist so that I could also help somebody else tomorrow just as you helped me. I thank you for your time and your help. Fatan Kercagu Rahovec, Kosovo Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : +37744 119934 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:24AM -0400, Jerry B. Altzman wrote: >> And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* >> decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a >> switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll >> find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might >> actually be on to something, there, and that ASICs might actually be >> worth what you paid for them. > Yep, and if you do buy a whole bunch of quad-port NICs for your PC, then > the whole system will probably end up costing quite a bit. It might even > turn out to be cheaper to get a "real" router instead. I don't know about that: Intel quad gigE cards are $250/pop on eBay; Sun qfe cards are a tenth of that price. Have you priced Vendor C or Vendor J routers recently? If you're building a *switch*, you are still price competitive with the bigger vendors. Oh yeah, this is all ONLY for passing ethernet; if you've got other layer-1 technologies to integrate, you're in for a surprise, too. > Erik Trulsson //jbaltz -- jerry b. altzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jbaltz.com foo mane padme hum ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Putting a total of 6 quad-port NICs on a single PCI-bus would totally swamp > that bus though, so if one were to actually use so many NICs I would rather > recommend e.g. the Asus P5BP-E/4L motherboard. It has 3 PCI slots and 3 > PCI-E slots in addition to the four gigabit LAN ports included on the > motherboard - so you can get a total of 28 ports if you fully populate all > slots with quad-port NICs (not counting any USB-connected ethernet ports one > might add.) It also has built-in graphics so one does not need to waste > one slot on a graphics card.) And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might actually be on to something, there, and that ASICs might actually be worth what you paid for them. YMMV, HTH, HAND. > Erik Trulsson //jbaltz -- jerry b. altzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jbaltz.com foo mane padme hum ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:24AM -0400, Jerry B. Altzman wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Putting a total of 6 quad-port NICs on a single PCI-bus would totally swamp > > that bus though, so if one were to actually use so many NICs I would rather > > recommend e.g. the Asus P5BP-E/4L motherboard. It has 3 PCI slots and 3 > > PCI-E slots in addition to the four gigabit LAN ports included on the > > motherboard - so you can get a total of 28 ports if you fully populate all > > slots with quad-port NICs (not counting any USB-connected ethernet ports one > > might add.) It also has built-in graphics so one does not need to waste > > one slot on a graphics card.) > > And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* > decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a > switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll > find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might > actually be on to something, there, and that ASICs might actually be > worth what you paid for them. > > YMMV, HTH, HAND. Yep, and if you do buy a whole bunch of quad-port NICs for your PC, then the whole system will probably end up costing quite a bit. It might even turn out to be cheaper to get a "real" router instead. -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
From: Jerry B. Altzman > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (Putting a total of 6 quad-port NICs on a single PCI-bus would totally swamp >> that bus though, so if one were to actually use so many NICs I would rather >> recommend e.g. the Asus P5BP-E/4L motherboard. It has 3 PCI slots and 3 >> PCI-E slots in addition to the four gigabit LAN ports included on the >> motherboard - so you can get a total of 28 ports if you fully populate all >> slots with quad-port NICs (not counting any USB-connected ethernet ports one >> might add.) It also has built-in graphics so one does not need to waste >> one slot on a graphics card.) > > And all this just to *pass packets*; if you're making real *routing* > decisions based upon that (i.e. you're making a router rather than a > switch), which requires that packets take a trip to the CPU, you'll > find yourself coming to the realization that Cisco and Juniper might > actually be on to something, there, and that ASICs might actually be > worth what you paid for them. > > YMMV, HTH, HAND. I don't need that many Ethernet ports, but I do need most of those PCI slots. I was unable to locate a box with more than four slots and a warranty that was acceptable to our Production group. I'm still not sure about the warranty or that we can buy it in a case with power supply. But at least I have a vector to resume my search. Thanks, Bob McConnell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Survive from DDoS
Hi, What I wanted to say was to use pf, not ipf. You may use something like this: table persist block log quick from # sshspammer # more than 6 ssh attempts in 15 seconds will be blocked ;) pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port ssh keep state (max-src-conn 10, max-src-conn-rate 6/15, overload flush global) which I use for ssh flood protection or brute force attacks. You have to change the syntax to use it for DNS. Hope this will help you. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28.05.2008 11:34 To Ivailo Tanusheff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: Survive from DDoS Dear Ivailo, thank you for your response. I am using ipfw to limit all packets for all open port in my server. But the packet size was 600 Mbps which could not filtered by our ISP. Ivailo Tanusheff wrote: > Hi, > > you may use ipf to drop packets from the attacking host I suppose. Or even > limit the packets to the specified port. > > Regards, > > Ivailo Tanusheff > > > > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 28.05.2008 05:01 > > To > "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > cc > > Subject > Survive from DDoS > > > > > > > Dear all, > > yesterday, our shell server was attack and server immeditiately reboot. > I checked logs, it likes UDP flood with destination port 53. Is there > any way how to survive from this kind attack? Also, is there any > url/resources to improve our shell server? > > Thank you > > > Kalpin Erlangga Silaen > > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Need help with multicast routing over VPN
My organisation has successfully used FreeBSD to set up a VPN between three sites. Now, in order to facilitate a phone system using VOIP between two of those sites, I have attempted to enable multi-cast routing between those sites. I looked at the mrouted manual, and attempted to configure it properly insofar as I understood it. I also re-compiled the kernels of the firewalls to enable multicast routing. I have not succeeded in getting the phone systems to see eachothers' multicast packets, and after several attempts, all I have done is to crash the firewalls, and annoy my staff members. If someone has done this sort of thing before, I would be prepared to send my config files to them for review (/etc/rc.conf, /etc/ipsec.conf, /etc/mrouted.conf, /usr/ local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf and /etc/rc.firewall are the files I think are of interest). Both systems are running FreeBSD 6.3-stable as of friday of last week. Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:51:35AM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote: > From: Robert Huff > > Bob McConnell writes: > > > >> >>> define what "enterprise level router" is > >> >> > >> >> Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? > >> > > >> > so get 486, 16MB RAM, needed amount of network cards, install > FreeBSD > >> and > >> > configure :) > >> > > >> > (pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) > >> > >> Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. > > > > Six slots X quad-port network cards = 24 interfaces. > > If you need more than that, it's probably worth investing in > > specialized hard-/software. > > > Robert Huff > > Where did you find a box with six slots? Motherboards (in standard ATX format) with six PCI slots are not all that difficult to find. If you include PCI-E and PCI-X in 'PCI' it is even easier, but there certainly exist ones with six normal 32-bit/33MHz PCI slots as well. Today it is not very common, but if you look at older socketA boards it was actually fairly common. (The Asus A7V8X-X is one example of such a board, but there were several others.) (Putting a total of 6 quad-port NICs on a single PCI-bus would totally swamp that bus though, so if one were to actually use so many NICs I would rather recommend e.g. the Asus P5BP-E/4L motherboard. It has 3 PCI slots and 3 PCI-E slots in addition to the four gigabit LAN ports included on the motherboard - so you can get a total of 28 ports if you fully populate all slots with quad-port NICs (not counting any USB-connected ethernet ports one might add.) It also has built-in graphics so one does not need to waste one slot on a graphics card.) -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Survive from DDoS
Kalpin Erlangga Silaen wrote:
> yesterday, our shell server was attack and server immeditiately reboot.
> I checked logs, it likes UDP flood with destination port 53. Is there
> any way how to survive from this kind attack?
(i)
Do a "grep 53 /etc/services" and search for ports 53 on both tcp and udp.
Use tcpdump to examine the traffic to see if you can find out what is
making the requests.
(ii)
You could set up a caching-only name server. By default, the queries
would be performed through a random port, and any previous queries would
reference the cache, rather than rely on the remote DNS.
(iii)
I found this on the net:
You could tie your address resolution to a group.
Say, for instance, you create a group called "resolve", and add yourself
to it and root (for ports):
# pw groupadd resolve -M root,you
Then, just add something like this to IPFW rule set, replacing the
example DNS addresses with your actual addresses:
DNS1="1.2.3.4"
DNS2="5.6.7.8"
add pass udp from any 53 to { DNS1 or DNS2 } 53 out gid resolve keep-state
That would have the effect of blocking anything outward-bound from port
53, except that of address queries by you and root.
If you're running a caching-only NS, set-up "bind" as a member of the
group, and your firewall line w/o the port 53 specification:
# pw groupadd resolve -M bind
add pass udp from any 53 to { $DNS1 or $DNS2 } 53 out gid resolve keep-state
add pass udp from any to { $DNS1 or $DNS2 } 53 out gid resolve keep-state
That will block everyone but bind from querying the remote DNS server.
-- cut --
I hope this helps...
Jos
-- My other computer is a *BBC Model B+
*
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
From: Robert Huff > Bob McConnell writes: > >> >>> define what "enterprise level router" is >> >> >> >> Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? >> > >> > so get 486, 16MB RAM, needed amount of network cards, install FreeBSD >> and >> > configure :) >> > >> > (pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) >> >> Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. > > Six slots X quad-port network cards = 24 interfaces. > If you need more than that, it's probably worth investing in > specialized hard-/software. > Robert Huff Where did you find a box with six slots? Bob McConnell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
Bob McConnell writes: > >>> define what "enterprise level router" is > >> > >> Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? > > > > so get 486, 16MB RAM, needed amount of network cards, install FreeBSD > and > > configure :) > > > > (pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) > > Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. Six slots X quad-port network cards = 24 interfaces. If you need more than that, it's probably worth investing in specialized hard-/software. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD based router ...
Wojciech Puchar >>> define what "enterprise level router" is >> >> Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? > > so get 486, 16MB RAM, needed amount of network cards, install FreeBSD and > configure :) > > (pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) Finding a box with that enough PCI slots might be problematic. Bob McConnell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
FreeBSD? define what "enterprise level router" is Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? so get 486, 16MB RAM, needed amount of network cards, install FreeBSD and configure :) (pentium may be needed for full 100Mb/s capability) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Wojciech Puchar wrote: Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of FreeBSD? define what "enterprise level router" is Something that doesn't say 'Vista capable' on the box? :) Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: dump and remote file fetching
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > Need a word of advice. I use dump to backup my data. All fine. Dump saves >>> compressed *.bz2 files. Nice. All I need now is a way to copy them from the >>> server to a remote backup machine. The problem I am facing is that bz2 files >>> are owned by root:wheel. So if I use scp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/*.bz2, >>> it does not have sufficient permissions to fetch the files. I can use sudo, >>> but then I need to interactively type the password, which I would like to >>> avoid. >>> >>> Can you suggest simple ways of getting around this? I don't mind using >>> special tools for the job, especially if they are not too complicated... :) >>> >>> Before firing this email off I took a look at rsync and it seems easy >>> enough to do just what I need but still many thanks for suggestions! >>> >> >> I have been very happy with rsnapshot. Take that for a spin and see how >> it works for you >> > > I have taken a look at rsnapshot but it seems I am left to deal with the > same problem: > > From their page: > In addition to full paths on the local filesystem, you can also backup > remote systems using rsync over ssh. If you have ssh installed and enabled > (via the cmd_ssh parameter), you can specify a path like: > > backup [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ example.com/ > > This behaves fundamentally the same way, but you must take a few extra > things into account. > > a/ The ssh daemon must be running on example.com > b/ You must have access to the account you specify the remote machine, in > this case the root user on example.com. > > I do not allow remote root login so what are my options in that case? How > do you deal with such a scenario? Many thanks! HI ZS, I used to do something like this with a very simple shell script, using ftp. In the script, I was simply checking the filename, extracting the date from it, comparing the date with today's date, and pushing into a nother server all files that are dated yesterday. These were log files created using another script, which would create them like main.MMDD.log. IIRC, ftp relies on a file ~/.netrc which can have the destination hostname, username and password. With these, ftp will be automated - no need to enter any logon credentials. Please read the man page for ftp on how to use the netrc file or the ~/.netrc If you need more assistance, find me off list:-) Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!" --from a /. post ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Survive from DDoS
Dear Ivailo, thank you for your response. I am using ipfw to limit all packets for all open port in my server. But the packet size was 600 Mbps which could not filtered by our ISP. Ivailo Tanusheff wrote: Hi, you may use ipf to drop packets from the attacking host I suppose. Or even limit the packets to the specified port. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28.05.2008 05:01 To "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" cc Subject Survive from DDoS Dear all, yesterday, our shell server was attack and server immeditiately reboot. I checked logs, it likes UDP flood with destination port 53. Is there any way how to survive from this kind attack? Also, is there any url/resources to improve our shell server? Thank you Kalpin Erlangga Silaen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Survive from DDoS
Hi, you may use ipf to drop packets from the attacking host I suppose. Or even limit the packets to the specified port. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Kalpin Erlangga Silaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28.05.2008 05:01 To "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" cc Subject Survive from DDoS Dear all, yesterday, our shell server was attack and server immeditiately reboot. I checked logs, it likes UDP flood with destination port 53. Is there any way how to survive from this kind attack? Also, is there any url/resources to improve our shell server? Thank you Kalpin Erlangga Silaen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of FreeBSD? define what "enterprise level router" is - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkg8u+cACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMF8wCg25K5IaX4/DIHk8KFIAfKXe/b decAoOqllLM7c6ty7wwXcwuPlEk/xSo6 =O+GR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Low/Jerky performance in FreeBSD 7
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:45:41AM -0700, Yani Brankov wrote: > I recently updated to FreeBSD 7 and noticed that my box started to perform > as windows does under heavier loads. The mouse starts to be jerky when > compiling, window updates/redraws are slow and bump the CPU usage up to > 100%. I attributed this to the mga driver which comes with the distro in the > beginning. However, I later noticed the same happens even when X has not > been started. For instance, I start a kernel compile and the console mouse > becomes jumpy. All these have never happened before with FreeBSD on this > box. It has enough memory (1.5G) and relatively fast CPU (2.5GHz). I started > to think this may be originating from kernel level (irq handling, long times > in giant locked code during syscalls, etc). > > I am wondering whether it is only me who has hit this problem or it is more > common. It may be also related to hardware configuration, etc. I'm trying to > figure out. Try profiling your kernel with PMC: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-February/061096.html Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
