CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80)
I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a zpool export on both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing zpool import BACKUP00 results in cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available and on console I receive message ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 But the drive is and was ada3! Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: pool: BACKUP00 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the same command! I did a full zpool scrub on both pools - no effect. Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. gpart show ada3 lists this: =34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 344062- free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80 at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. Thanks in advance, Oliver ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Web mail for not local domains.
On 28 November 2010 20:56, Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote: Openwebmail 1.53 -Grant -Original Message- From: Jim Pazarena Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains. On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote: Hello all. I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for the following. roundcube -- Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org all of the above will do it fine. Just make sure you set them up to do it via imap not pop3. Google mail should work fine as well as that can hook into imap accounts ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ZFS based machine to build a backup server ?
Hello Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build a backups server to store sensitive data ? In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote: In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? Yes. But do it with a machine with a lot of memory and run 64bit. -- chs, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ?
On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote: Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build a backups server to store sensitive data ? In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? That's a regular theological debate round here, and some people will say yes, and others an emphatic no. I'm personally happy with ZFS raidz, others prefer UFS + mirroring + journalling. Speaking with far too many years of experience as a sysadmin, no single backup solution is ever truly adequate. You want off site backups as well as on site. For the off site backups, take a look at tarsnap: http://www.tarsnap.com/ -- Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like. -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS based machine to build a backup server ?
On 29 November 2010 10:54, Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote: On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote: Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build a backups server to store sensitive data ? In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ? That's a regular theological debate round here, and some people will say yes, and others an emphatic no. I'm personally happy with ZFS raidz, others prefer UFS + mirroring + journalling. Speaking with far too many years of experience as a sysadmin, no single backup solution is ever truly adequate. You want off site backups as well as on site. For the off site backups, take a look at tarsnap: http://www.tarsnap.com/ -- Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like. -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org It does all come down to risk analysis. In my experience company politics have far to much influence on this than I like. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type 0 not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.]
- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com - On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: [ia64] ia64% file a.out a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped [amd64] amd64% file a.out a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's properly declared as FreeBSD. This is a binutils problem. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com - End forwarded message - Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant by binutils problem, and how to fix it? I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
linking against shared libraries not in default path
I compiled some numerical libraries under my home directory, including static and shared libs. The shared lib is % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 ./src/libslatec.so.1 % Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec % ./test01.x /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslatec.so.1 not found, required by test01.x % How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but it didn't help. Perhaps I completely misunderstand how shared libraries work.. Please advise many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: |I compiled some numerical libraries under my home |directory, including static and shared libs. The |shared lib is | |% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 |./src/libslatec.so.1 |% | |Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do | |% gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec |% ./test01.x |/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslatec.so.1 not found, required by test01.x |% | |How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library |in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but |it didn't help. | |Perhaps I completely misunderstand how shared libraries work.. | |Please advise | ldconfig -m ./src/libslatec.so.1 (in your example) +---+ ! CANMOS ISP Network! +---+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: ig...@canmos.ru ! +---+ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: |I compiled some numerical libraries under my home |directory, including static and shared libs. The |shared lib is | |% ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 |./src/libslatec.so.1 |% | |Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do | |% gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec |% ./test01.x |/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslatec.so.1 not found, required by test01.x |% | |How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library |in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but |it didn't help. | Ooops, sorry, you must give full path of shared object, *NOT* a file name: ldconfig -m ./src in your test example. +---+ ! CANMOS ISP Network! +---+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: ig...@canmos.ru ! +---+ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path
On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I compiled some numerical libraries under my home directory, including static and shared libs. The shared lib is % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 ./src/libslatec.so.1 % Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec % ./test01.x /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslatec.so.1 not found, required by test01.x % How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but it didn't help. The name of the variable is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It is described in the rtld(1) manpage. You can also add it to the executable using -R as in: % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -Rfull path -lslatec signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD
Hey list On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain I would like to know a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD and b) how to fix this error: [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh sum1 Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir shared amongst all centos and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? thanks!! -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B6D6EAC3 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, bluethundr bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: Hey list On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain I would like to know a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD and b) how to fix this error: [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh sum1 Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir shared amongst all centos and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? thanks!! The man page for ssh-agent is very informative: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ssh-agentsektion=1 I read it recently when setting up my system to do as you're trying to do. Of course, don't hesitate to refer to the EXCELLENT FreeBSD Handbook, it is absolutely one of the best references I've ever seen for any software: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/openssh.html Good luck! -Brandon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linking against shared libraries not in default path
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Monday 29 November 2010 14:50:59 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I compiled some numerical libraries under my home directory, including static and shared libs. The shared lib is % ls ./src/libslatec.so.1 ./src/libslatec.so.1 % Now I'd like to test shared libraries, so I do % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -lslatec % ./test01.x /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslatec.so.1 not found, required by test01.x % How can I tell the executable to look for a shared library in a specific directory? I tried setting LIBRARY_PATH, but it didn't help. The name of the variable is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It is described in the rtld(1) manpage. You can also add it to the executable using -R as in: % gfortran45 -o test01.x test01.o qc6a.o -L./src/ -Rfull path -lslatec Tijl, thank you. Both options work for me on amd64 and ia64. thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:25:06 pm Andrew Moran wrote: Hey guys, After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to ask for help. I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system (tech specs here http://us.shuttle.com/J1_4100.aspx). I installed from DVD and the install went fine. I notice when I pkg_add -r anything, the network stops responding. Some details: 1) I can reproduce it 100% by downloading a large file. low traffic like the SSH connection does not trigger it. I think it's being triggered by traffic above a certain rate. 2) I can recover by restarting the network interfaces (/etc/rc.d/netif stop; /etc/rc.d/netif start) 3) I see no errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. Nothing at all. 4) I've tried the following in /etc/sysctl.conf: net.inet.tcp.tso=0 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 and in /boot/loader.conf: hw.pci.enable_msix=0 hw.pci.enable_msi=0 hw.bce.tso_enable=0 But the problem persists. The interface is identified as: mskc0: Marvell Yukon 88E8057 Gigabit Ethernet port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebfc000-0xfebf irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 msk0: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Yukon Ultra 2 Id 0xba Rev 0x00 on mskc0 msk0: Ethernet address: 80:ee:73:01:60:7d miibus0: MII bus on msk0 e1000phy0: Marvell 88E1149 Gigabit PHY PHY 0 on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto mskc0: [ITHREAD] When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on the same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of pause frames. I've only had this problem with a gigE switch, it works fine for me on a 10/100 switch. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gateway_enable=NO
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 339, Issue 1, Message: 20 On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:40:21 +0100 Lokadamus lokada...@gmx.de wrote: Am 25.11.2010 05:38, schrieb Lamac Lamaco: The system installed now and in adresses /etc or /etc/rc.d there is no script. Does system work in default as ROUTER? I ask this question, because i tried it works. As it is written gateway_enable=NO # Set to YES if this host will be a gateway in the address - /etc/defaults/rc.conf But if I write gateway_enable=NO in the address /etc/rc.conf , my system will work in as ROUTER. I say this because the host in my system's local network can ping my system's global IP. As i know it can be only in ROUTER. No, being able to ping any address on any interface on a system is not the same as being able to route packets elsewhere through that system. Only specific firewall rules would prevent that, if you had some need to deny inside net hosts access to some service/s bound to your outside IP. If a local network host can ping anywhere outside through your system, then it's acting as a gateway aka router for that host; not otherwise. Thanks. No worries. No, in default FreeBSD isn't working as a router. Right. Look with sysctl at: net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept When is it set to 1, FreeBSD is working as a router, with a value of 0 it doesn't work as a router. Wrong; sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept has nothing to do with this; gateway_enable=YES causes setting sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 Look with tcpdump where networktraffic is going. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-routing.html Good advice. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80)
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a zpool export on both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing zpool import BACKUP00 results in cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available and on console I receive message ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 But the drive is and was ada3! Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: pool: BACKUP00 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the same command! I did a full zpool scrub on both pools - no effect. Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. gpart show ada3 lists this: =34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 344062- free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80 at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. Thanks in advance, Oliver Hi Oliver, just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers and zpool version numbers the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? Best Regards, Leonidas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80)
On 29 November 2010 16:41, Leonidas Tsampros ltsamp...@upnet.gr wrote: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a zpool export on both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing zpool import BACKUP00 results in cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available and on console I receive message ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 But the drive is and was ada3! Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: pool: BACKUP00 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the same command! I did a full zpool scrub on both pools - no effect. Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. gpart show ada3 lists this: =34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 344062- free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80 at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. Thanks in advance, Oliver Hi Oliver, just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers and zpool version numbers the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? Best Regards, Leonidas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org i think both are on version 15, however a v22 patch is in testing and will probably hit head fairly soon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Broken port?
List, I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. Thanks! -Modulok- Error Below: === Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 === py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found === py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found === py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found === py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb=1.2.2 - found === py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found ===Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE = Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or = Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80)
O. Hartmann wrote: Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Please send the output of camcontrol devlist and zpool status on FreeBSD-8.1. Then export the pool in FreeBSD-8.1, boot FreeBSD-9 with verbose booting and send the output of camcontrol devlist, zpool import BACKUP and the part of /var/log/messages that shows FreeeBSD searching for the pool during the import. It might be useful to know what disk controller is being used. =34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 344062- free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) It is not related to your problem, but how did that unused space wind up before partition 1? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: msk0 interface stops working when downloading
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Baldwin Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:54 AM To: freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org Cc: Andrew Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk0 interface stops working when downloading On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:25:06 pm Andrew Moran wrote: Hey guys, After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to ask for help. I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system (tech specs here http://us.shuttle.com/J1_4100.aspx). I installed from DVD and the install went fine. I notice when I pkg_add -r anything, the network stops responding. Some details: 1) I can reproduce it 100% by downloading a large file. low traffic like the SSH connection does not trigger it. I think it's being triggered by traffic above a certain rate. 2) I can recover by restarting the network interfaces (/etc/rc.d/netif stop; /etc/rc.d/netif start) 3) I see no errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. Nothing at all. 4) I've tried the following in /etc/sysctl.conf: net.inet.tcp.tso=0 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 and in /boot/loader.conf: hw.pci.enable_msix=0 hw.pci.enable_msi=0 hw.bce.tso_enable=0 But the problem persists. The interface is identified as: mskc0: Marvell Yukon 88E8057 Gigabit Ethernet port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebfc000-0xfebf irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 msk0: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Yukon Ultra 2 Id 0xba Rev 0x00 on mskc0 msk0: Ethernet address: 80:ee:73:01:60:7d miibus0: MII bus on msk0 e1000phy0: Marvell 88E1149 Gigabit PHY PHY 0 on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto mskc0: [ITHREAD] When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on the same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of pause frames. I've only had this problem with a gigE switch, it works fine for me on a 10/100 switch. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org When I've seen this on my netbook I did a tcpdump on another machien on the same hub and found that my msk0 device was spewing an endless stream of pause frames. If there's an option to disable Ethernet flow control, (commonly used on Gig stuff) perhaps disabling it will prevent the unwanted spewing. Unwaanted spewing is always bad. font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD
On Mon Nov 29 10, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, bluethundr bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: Hey list On my CentOS machines I usually keep track of my rsa key with ssh-agent, ssh-add and keychain I would like to know a) how to install keychain under FreeBSD and b) how to fix this error: [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh sum1 Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash ^^ this looks wrong. i think you want eval `ssh-agent` so the envars get set. otherwise ssh-add won't know where to look for a running ssh-agent. cheers. alex [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.a Whenever I try to ssh to another box on the network (with a homedir shared amongst all centos and FreeBSD machines) it prompts me for my passphrase. Usually on the CentOS boxes exec ssh-agent bash does the trick. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working on the FreeBSD box? thanks!! The man page for ssh-agent is very informative: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ssh-agentsektion=1 I read it recently when setting up my system to do as you're trying to do. Of course, don't hesitate to refer to the EXCELLENT FreeBSD Handbook, it is absolutely one of the best references I've ever seen for any software: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/openssh.html Good luck! -Brandon -- a13x ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Broken port?
Hi! The current version of databases/py-sqlite3 is 2.6.6_1 (python version 2.6.6) - therefore I suggest you update your ports tree and your ports. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html for more information on how to do that if you have not done that before. If the problem still occurs afterward you should file a problem report. ( http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html ) Armin On 11/29/10 19:34, Modulok wrote: List, I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. Thanks! -Modulok- Error Below: === Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb=1.2.2 - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found === Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE = Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or = Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CURRENT: Issue with ZFS and 2TB WD HDD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80)
On 11/29/10 17:41, Leonidas Tsampros wrote: O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: I'm running a newly setup FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 SMP box. The former OS was FreeBSD 8.1-PRE/amd64. Attached to the system are three WD harddrives with ZFS as filesystem on GPT partitioning scheme. Two 1TB HDD are spanning a volume with 2 TB capacity which is quite fast due to parallel access through ZFS. The underlying layout is, as mentioned, GPT, bot devices are named /dev/ada1p1 and /dev/ada2p1. The thir drive is a WD Caviar Green 2TB HDD acting as a compressed ZFS backup media, also based on a GPT partitioning scheme and known as device /dev/ada3p1. In FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd64 I can use the JBOD volume resembled from two 1TB HDD without problems, mounting is all right, dismounting, also with the 2TB HDD, labeld as BACKUP00 volume in ZFS. Doing a zpool export on both ZFS volumes works fine in FBSD 8, importing is also no problem. The system's log does not show any kind of irregularities, errors or something else indicating soemthing weird with one of the three devices. Exporting both volumes in FreeBSD 8 works. But importing them in FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 as with the most recent make world of today fails on the 2TB HDD (ZFS pool/volume BACKUP00). Issuing zpool import BACKUP00 results in cannot import 'BACKUP': no such pool available and on console I receive message ZFS WARNING: Unable to attach to ada1 But the drive is and was ada3! Looking with zpool status, I get the follwoing picture: pool: BACKUP00 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM BACKUP00FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data ada3 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data pool: THOR00 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM THOR00 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors This picture differs from what I see i FreeBSD 8.2-PRE/amd issuing the same command! I did a full zpool scrub on both pools - no effect. Surprisingly, the GPT partition of the pool BACKUP00 isn't shown in FreeBSD 9, while I see ada3p1 in FreeBSD 8.2. gpart show ada3 lists this: = 34 3907029101 ada3 GPT (1.8T) 344062- free - (2.0M) 4096 3907025039 1 freebsd-zfs (1.8T) The drive in question is a WesternDigital Caviar Green WD (WDC WD20EURS-63Z9B1 80.00A80 at scbus7 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada3)). Can someone explain what#s going on? The drive in question is one of the new 4k sized physical block devices. Why is FreeBSD 8 dealing with the HDD, FreeBSD 9 not? Any help at this point? Hope the volume is not lost. Thanks in advance, Oliver Hi Oliver, just a wild guess and maybe completely wrong: are the ZFS version numbers and zpool version numbers the same across 8.1 and 9-CURRENT ? Best Regards, Leonidas Hello Leonidas, both pools are versioned '15', that is the most recent version in 9.0-CURRENT and 8.2-PRE. One of the both pools, that one spanned over two 1 TB hard drives, works perfectly. The backup pool on the 2TB hdd does not. It seems that the partitioning information got lost in FreeBSD 9. The hdd in question is one of that new 2TB drives of WD with 4k blocks ... maybe I made a mistake when initiatet the GPT layout ... (started the partition at block 4096 with the '-b'-option of 'gpart add'). Greetings, Oliver ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Console Messages
Original Message- From: per...@pluto.rain.com Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:03 PM To: gp...@thenetnow.com Cc: freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console Messages Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote: ... You may need to go -hackers for this... What is -hackers? ... ? Yep. I've observed a tendency not to put full listn...@domain addresses in messages, perhaps in an attempt to avoid harvesting by spammers :( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Indeed, I have have tendencies in the past to accidentally hit the reply all instead of the reply button will pay more attention in the future. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Broken port?
On 11/29/10 19:34, Modulok wrote: List, I tried to install django with sqlite support from ports and got the error shown below. What do I do to fix this? Do I email a port maintainer or something? I used portsnap to update my ports collection before trying the install. I'm on 8.1-RELEASE amd64. Thanks! -Modulok- Error Below: === Installing for py26-django-1.2.3 ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/_psp.so - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on package: py26-MySQLdb=1.2.2 - found ===py26-django-1.2.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so - not found === Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sqlite3.so in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE = Python-2.6.5.tgz is not in /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo. = Either /usr/ports/lang/python26/distinfo is out of date, or = Python-2.6.5.tgz is spelled incorrectly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/py-django. This actually looks like he port is failing to pull in it's required dependency (in this case, sqlite). I would as Armin suggested to do, first update your port-tree again, try to install it again, cd into the port and 'make distclean rmconfig' to start fresh and start from the beginning. If it still fails, file the pr and/or contact the port maintainer. I would actually do all of this and document it for the pr and the port-maintainer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ssh-agent and ssh-add on FreeBSD
On 29/11/2010 19:08, Alexander Best wrote: [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#ssh sum1 Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa': [bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#exec ssh-agent bash ^^ this looks wrong. i think you want eval `ssh-agent` so the envars get set. otherwise ssh-add won't know where to look for a running ssh-agent. Both forms are correct. eval $(ssh-agent) modifies the environment in the current shell so ssh-add can contact ssh-agent, whereas ssh-agent bash causes ssh-agent to run a copy of bash, which will it will pass down the appropriate environmental settings to. exec is just gravy, in that it replaces the current shell with the ssh-agent process, rather than leaving it lying around uselessly. For the OP: no good idea why the command isn't working for you. Try it without the exec and also try it adding '-d' to the ssh-agent flags to see if the debug output contains any clues. Be sure /tmp has the correct permissions (1777) and that the partition hasn't filled up, so running ssh-agent can create a directory containing the unix domain socket ssh-add uses to connect to the agent. As for installing keychain try: # cd /usr/ports/security/keychain # make all install clean or if you've installed it: # portmaster security/keychain Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Listar command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar --
Request received for list 'bnfrance' via request address. The original message was received at Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:44:56 -0800 Unknown command. from freebsd.org [172.144.236.172] Unknown command. - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - Unknown command. bnfrance-requ...@ml.free.fr Unknown command. - Transcript of session follows - Unknown command. ... while talking to host ml.free.fr.: Unknown command. DATA Unknown command. 400-aturner; -RMS-E-CRE, ACP file create failed Unknown command. 400 Unknown command. --- Gestionnaire de liste Listar/0.42 - fin de traitement/job execution complete. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64
Hi, On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the dovecot metadata and webmail uses imapd. Client connections to imapd go to random servers and I don't yet have solid means to keep certain users on certain servers. I upgraded some of the servers to 8.x and dovecot 1.2 and ran into Stale NFS file handles causing index/uidlist corruption causing inboxes to appear as empty when they were not. In some situations their corrupt index had to be deleted manually. I first suspected dovecot 1.2 since it was upgraded at the same time but I downgraded to 1.1 and its doing the same thing. I don't really have a wealth of details to go on yet and I usually stay quiet until I do, and half the time it is difficult to reproduce myself so I've had to put it in production to get a feel for progress. This only happens a dozen or so times per weekday but I feel the need to start taking bigger steps. I'll probably do what Does it depend on the size of the message? I can to get IMAP back on a stable base (7.x?) and also try to debug 8.x on the remaining servers. A binary search is within possibility if I can reproduce the symptoms often enough even if I have to put a test server in production for a few hours. Any tips on where we could start looking, or alterations I could try making such as sysctls to return to older behavior? It might be worth there were some problems on nullfs mounted nfs shares (like in jails) and dovecot, as dovecot changed its location for temporary file creation to the user home. But IIRC the error message looked more like: http://www.mail-archive.com/dove...@dovecot.org/msg26856.html And are fixed in stable. Just a hint, Leon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music
All, I was getting exactly this same error following a fresh 8.1 load Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back the solution was explained in the gnome install FAQ - here is a clip - the devfs.conf changes fixed the problem. To figure out which CD/DVD drive you will be using, run the following command as root: # camcontrol devlist Your output will look similar to the following: QSI CDRW/DVD SBW-242 UD22 at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) The devices in parentheses at the end are important. You must make sure the /dev entries for those devices are writable by the users that will be using brasero, totem, rhythmbox, or sound-juicer. In addition to those devices, /dev/xpt* must also be writable to your brasero, totem, rhythmbox, and sound-juicer users. The following /etc/devfs.conf configuration will achieve the desired results given the above devlist: permcd0 0666 permxpt00666 permpass0 0666 Nick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
snmp cpu
Hi, reading this: http://old.nabble.com/Measuring-CPU-usage-via-SNMP-td23392403.html So fetching the matching ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should always equal 100% cpu. but when I fetch cpurawidle it is about 100, system 25 totalling give me 125. What wrong I do? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PHP Command Line
I'm new to PHP, and I'm trying to make use of the interactive commandline, but I'm finding 'php -a' isn't working. More specifically, no 'php' prompt, no output, nada. I've found comments on the intarwebs making mention of the need for readline support, but past that, I'm at a loss. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
