Re: snd_hda: how to configure line-in passthrough to line-out?

2011-10-06 Thread Brandon Kuczenski

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Polytropon wrote:


On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:58:14 -0700 (PDT), Brandon Kuczenski wrote:

I'm working on the sound on my system running 8.2-RELEASE.  Currently I
have sound input and output working using snd_hda (i.e. I can record on
line in, and play it back on line out).

What I would like to do is take the audio coming in on line-in and send it
back out the line-out "live" without recording it.

Is this easy to do?  I'd appreciate any hints.


I think it is easy to do. If I remember terminology
correctly, the thing you're searching for is MONITOR.
Instead of setting rec source to mic, set it to line,
and increase monitor level.


Thanks for your assistance.. unfortunately, setting the mixer
levels has not been enough to get a passthrough.  Here is my mixer output:

Mixer vol  is currently set to   1:1
Mixer pcm  is currently set to  45:45
Mixer line is currently set to  75:75
Mixer mic  is currently set to   0:0
Mixer cd   is currently set to  75:75
Mixer rec  is currently set to  75:75
Mixer igainis currently set to 100:100
Mixer ogainis currently set to  50:50
Mixer monitor  is currently set to 100:100
Recording source: line

I'm using wavplay(1) from the ports collection to record on line-in, and 
then I can play it back.  On playback I can hear it just fine-- it mixes 
with other outputs on the PCM channel as I would expect.  but when the 
line is "live" it is not being mixed into the output.





The line level should be possible to set independently
of the rec channel setting, so you should be able to
pass through line anyway - at least, that has been the
default ability of sound cards when they became available
for PC. But well... this has been 10... 20... years ago,
and nobody expects simple things to work as simple today
as they did in the past. :-)


Indeed, I wonder if it is a hardware capability problem, but I don't know 
how to try to answer that question.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
It is not so clear ..  My problem is:

My FreeBSD is a VMware Virtual machine, for 2 years.
When connecting to that machine via vSphere client, I get a KDM
login window and via Ctrl-Alt-F1  can switch to a console prompt
Well, that *was* possible ..

Since the last reboot, Ctrl-Alt-F1 (F2, .. F8) doesn't do anything
anymore...
Can't understand why, it always worked in the past?

I have an Tektronix X-terminal, the software running on it allows
me to enter my freesbd-machine hostname, then gives me a KDM login window.

If my 'console' login (via VMware's vSphere) could be made NOT be a
KDM graphical login, and my Xterminal still giving me a KDM login, this
would be a workarround (no need to do Ctrl-Alt-F1 on Xterminal),
[ and even a better solution, since I do never need graphical environment
when connecting to the console ]

How can I make the login different for console and other logins?
OR: HOW can I solve the Ctrl-Alt-F1 problem?

The setup in my Freebsd is:
I have in /etc/rc.conf
hald_enable="YES"
dbus_enable="YES"

I have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file

/etc/ttys has:
ttyv8   "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon"  xterm   on secure
(see below for other parts)
at boot this starts a /usr/local/bin/kdm script
the hald and dbus deamons are runnng ($ ps -jaxw | grep hald ..)

/usr/local/bin/kdm is a shell script first running
 /usr/local/bin/genkdmconf with config files from
/usr/local/share/config/kdm
 directory
but is is unclear if (and how) I can make a difference there between the
console and an X-terminal somewhere

--
# more /etc/ttys
...
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/etc.amd64/ttys,v 1.18.2.1.6.1 2010/12/21 17:09:25
kensmith Exp $
...
console noneunknown off secure
#
ttyv0   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
# Virtual terminals
ttyv1   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv2   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv3   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv4   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv5   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv6   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
ttyv7   "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25  on  secure
#ttyv8  "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon"  xterm   off secure
ttyv8   "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon"  xterm   on secure
# Serial terminals
# The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc.
ttyu0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   dialup  off secure
ttyu1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   dialup  off secure
ttyu2   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   dialup  off secure
ttyu3   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   dialup  off secure
# Dumb console
dcons   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   off secure
# Pseudo terminals
ttyp0   nonenetwork
ttyp1   nonenetwork
...
ttySv   nonenetwork
-



2011/10/5 David Brodbeck 

> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Apitz  wrote:
> > El día Wednesday, October 05, 2011 a las 12:10:47PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert
> escribió:
> >
> >> n dhert  writes:
> >>
> >> > FreeBSD-8.2 with Xorg:
> >> > Is there a way one can specify that your never have X on the console
> (just
> >> > the login: prompt)
> >> > but still have X on any other X-windows termnal (an KDM login window)
> and
> >> > graphical environment
> >>
> >> Sure.  It's all in how you configure KDM.
> >>
> >> In xdm it's set up in the access file;
> >> I wouldn't be surprised if kdm were the same.
> >
> > You have login: on console, login, create a file ~/.xinitrc with the
> > lines:
> >
> > twm &
> > xterm
> >
> > and then you just say: startx and X11 will come up; ofc you could remove
> > software or create some dirty xorg.conf file which X11 will not let come
> up;
>
> Couldn't you just remove execute permission for the X server binaries?
>  People using X terminals will only be running X clients, since the
> server will be their terminal.  In fact, i think you only need a
> server installed at all in this situation for dependency reasons.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Parallel fscks on large filesystems ... wondering about maxdsiz setting...

2011-10-06 Thread krad
On 5 October 2011 19:25, Jason Usher  wrote:

> Old 6.4-RELEASE system.
>
> Two filesystems exist, each of which is on its own raid controller.
>
> (Background fsck is not workable for various reasons that are tl;dr.)
>
> So, theoretically, doing both fscks at the same time is workable, since
> each of them are on their own controller, and no disk/controller resources
> are shared.
>
> HOWEVER, due to the large size and dense inode usage, we are forced to set:
>
> kern.maxdsiz="409600"
>
> And my question is:
>
> If I run two fscks at the same time, do I need to up this to 819200,
> or is this a per-process limit and I can run several processes that big,
> while leaving the value at 409600 ?
>
> (16 GB of ram, so either way we're well below)
>
> Thanks!
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>


If this becomes a major issue for you why not upgrade to 9 when its out then
you can have softupdates with journaling and remove most cases where you
need to run fsck, or make the jump to zfs. zfs will obviously require a bit
more thought.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 11:04:33AM +0200, n dhert escribió:

> It is not so clear ..  My problem is:
> 
> My FreeBSD is a VMware Virtual machine, for 2 years.
> When connecting to that machine via vSphere client, I get a KDM
> login window and via Ctrl-Alt-F1  can switch to a console prompt
> Well, that *was* possible ..
> 
> Since the last reboot, Ctrl-Alt-F1 (F2, .. F8) doesn't do anything
> anymore...
> Can't understand why, it always worked in the past?

Try:

Ctrl-Alt-SPACE and while Ctrl-ALt still down F1

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
I tried that already yesterday, with disastreous results: keyboard and mouse
completely locked.
Closed vsphere and started again, connect to freebsd machine: black window,
no reaction to any keyboard of
mouse ..

2011/10/6 Matthias Apitz 

> El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 11:04:33AM +0200, n dhert escribió:
>
> > It is not so clear ..  My problem is:
> >
> > My FreeBSD is a VMware Virtual machine, for 2 years.
> > When connecting to that machine via vSphere client, I get a KDM
> > login window and via Ctrl-Alt-F1  can switch to a console prompt
> > Well, that *was* possible ..
> >
> > Since the last reboot, Ctrl-Alt-F1 (F2, .. F8) doesn't do anything
> > anymore...
> > Can't understand why, it always worked in the past?
>
> Try:
>
> Ctrl-Alt-SPACE and while Ctrl-ALt still down F1
>
>matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Apitz
> t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
> e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
> 200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 11:51:22AM +0200, n dhert escribió:

> I tried that already yesterday, with disastreous results: keyboard and mouse
> completely locked.
> Closed vsphere and started again, connect to freebsd machine: black window,
> no reaction to any keyboard of
> mouse ..

Sorry to hear this. I have tested it with VMware 7.x running on my Win7
laptop and FreeBSD 9-CUR (r220692) in a VM. It worked fine for me.
File a bug report against vSphere.

HIH

matthias

PS: Please dont top-post

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
Are you sure it is a vSphere problem? I'm not sure:
I have used it for 2 years without problem, only with the last reboot (for
security update -p3 of FreeBSD 8.2)
I got into problems.  I update packages every week, maybe something changed
in the X packages (I do read
/ussr/ports/UPDATING always before updating, can't remember something would
have to be done before
upgrading)

2011/10/6 Matthias Apitz 

> El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 11:51:22AM +0200, n dhert escribió:
>
> > I tried that already yesterday, with disastreous results: keyboard and
> mouse
> > completely locked.
> > Closed vsphere and started again, connect to freebsd machine: black
> window,
> > no reaction to any keyboard of
> > mouse ..
>
> Sorry to hear this. I have tested it with VMware 7.x running on my Win7
> laptop and FreeBSD 9-CUR (r220692) in a VM. It worked fine for me.
> File a bug report against vSphere.
>
> HIH
>
>matthias
>
> PS: Please dont top-post
>
> --
> Matthias Apitz
> t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
> e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
> 200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 01:15:04PM +0200, n dhert escribió:

> Are you sure it is a vSphere problem? I'm not sure:
> I have used it for 2 years without problem, only with the last reboot (for
> security update -p3 of FreeBSD 8.2)
> I got into problems.  I update packages every week, maybe something changed
> in the X packages (I do read
> /ussr/ports/UPDATING always before updating, can't remember something would
> have to be done before
> upgrading)

(Note: I will from now ignore all top posted questions.)

You can watch with xev(1) if the F1 key stroke gets delivered to the
X11 server. In my case it is only delivered when I do Ctrl-Alt-Space
before.

HIH

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
(sorry for top posting, but your private address always comes in To: have to
remember deleting it..)

I can only test on my Xterminal since vsphere connection is a black screen
..
on Xterminal, xev :
when hitting F1 in the small Event test window, I get answer:

KeyPress event, serial 29, synthetic NO, window 0x481,
root 0x28, subw 0x0, time 2562153193, (4,176), root:(759,203),
state 0x0, keycode 15 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes:
XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes:
XFilterEvent returns: False
KeyRelease event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x481,
root 0x28, subw 0x0, time 2562153265, (4,176), root:(759,203),
state 0x0, keycode 15 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes:
XFilterEvent returns: False


2011/10/6 Matthias Apitz 

> El día Thursday, October 06, 2011 a las 01:15:04PM +0200, n dhert escribió:
>
> > Are you sure it is a vSphere problem? I'm not sure:
> > I have used it for 2 years without problem, only with the last reboot
> (for
> > security update -p3 of FreeBSD 8.2)
> > I got into problems.  I update packages every week, maybe something
> changed
> > in the X packages (I do read
> > /ussr/ports/UPDATING always before updating, can't remember something
> would
> > have to be done before
> > upgrading)
>
> (Note: I will from now ignore all top posted questions.)
>
> You can watch with xev(1) if the F1 key stroke gets delivered to the
> X11 server. In my case it is only delivered when I do Ctrl-Alt-Space
> before.
>
> HIH
>
>matthias
> --
> Matthias Apitz
> t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
> e  - w http://www.unixarea.de/
> 200†-20††: 10 years war in Afghanistan. Stop it now!
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


problems with IRQ

2011-10-06 Thread KES
system work fine, but systat -v show wrong results in compare with vmstat -i
seems counter overflow or so..

systat -v
2 usersLoad  0.95  1.13  1.15  Oct  6 17:36

Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL   VN PAGER   SWAP PAGER
Tot   Share  TotShareFree   in   out in   out
Act  3425966396   813716 9244 1395872  count
All  527128   10356  300289639336  pages
Proc:Interrupts
  r   p   d   s   w   Csw  Trp  Sys  Int  Sof  Flt 31 cow254k total
 50  557k 2614  14k 237k 4028  449127 zfodatkbd0 1
2 ozfod12 ata0 14
 9.1%Sys  21.7%Intr  1.6%User  0.0%Nice 67.6%Idle   1%ozfod  221k ehci0 16
|||||||||||   daefr 2 ehci1 23
=++>   37 prcfr  4130 cpu0:timer
42 dtbuf  314 totfr 15799 re0 256
Namei Name-cache   Dir-cache142271 desvn  react  4131 cpu1:timer
   Callshits   %hits   % 87941 numvn  pdwak  4129 cpu3:timer
61585762  94 35563 frevn  pdpgs  4130 cpu2:timer
  intrn
Disks   ad0   da0 pass0298480 wire
KB/t  18.79  0.00  0.00193600 act
tps  12 0 0   2103500 inact
MB/s   0.22  0.00  0.00  9180 cache
%busy 0 0 0   1386692 free


# vmstat -i
interrupt  total   rate
irq1: atkbd02536  0
irq14: ata0  8516926  9
irq16: ehci0  2233740154   2585
irq23: ehci1 2594742  3
cpu0:timer3562265448   4122
irq256: re0   2291967374   2652
cpu1:timer3562481709   4123
cpu3:timer3479157511   4026
cpu2:timer3555645238   4115
Total18696371638  21638

thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
Hi,
In your labserver, do you have a graphical login window at your labserver or
not ?
I don't want a graphical login, since I can't get anymore to the login
prompt via Ctrl Alt F1

In KDM, the config directory is /usr/local/share/config/kdm  for kdm window
manager, there is no
Xservers file, and I can't see any file .. there are Xaccess, Xwilling,
Xstartup, Xreset, Xsession files
and a large kdmrc file. There are no man pages for kdm, kdm-bin, Xaccess,
etc...

I tried setting ServerCmd=""  instead of ServerCmd=/usr/local/bin/X -br  in
the  kdmrc file ...
Now I only have /usr/local/bin/kdm-bin running, not /usr/local/bin/X

Am I right to believe the primary role of a local X server (local= on
labserver) is to have a graphical environment on that labserver machine ?

2011/10/6 Manolis Kiagias 

> On 5/10/2011 1:33 μμ, n dhert wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD-8.2 with Xorg:
>> Is there a way one can specify that your never have X on the console (just
>> the login: prompt)
>> but still have X on any other X-windows termnal (an KDM login window) and
>> graphical environment
>>
>
> I've got a lab that uses XDMCP and X-terminals and I don't run X on the
> server. I am using XDM and have commented out the following line in
> /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/**Xservers:
>
> # :0 local /usr/local/bin/X :0
>
> It might be something similar for KDM that will allow it to listen for
> remote connections but not run locally.
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD 8.0 -> PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all,
Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server 
to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ?
I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling 
will do it?
Any advice, samples would be appreciated,
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: problems with IRQ

2011-10-06 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Oct  6 11, KES wrote:
> system work fine, but systat -v show wrong results in compare with vmstat -i
> seems counter overflow or so..

i'd rather suspect that systat(1) is querying different variables/structures
than vmstat(8). their output is different on my system too and after only a few
hours of uptime and very little interrupts, i would rule out a counter
overflow.

cheers.
alex

> 
> systat -v
> 2 usersLoad  0.95  1.13  1.15  Oct  6 17:36
> 
> Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL   VN PAGER   SWAP PAGER
> Tot   Share  TotShareFree   in   out in   out
> Act  3425966396   813716 9244 1395872  count
> All  527128   10356  300289639336  pages
> Proc:Interrupts
>   r   p   d   s   w   Csw  Trp  Sys  Int  Sof  Flt 31 cow254k total
>  50  557k 2614  14k 237k 4028  449127 zfodatkbd0 1
> 2 ozfod12 ata0 14
>  9.1%Sys  21.7%Intr  1.6%User  0.0%Nice 67.6%Idle   1%ozfod  221k ehci0 16
> |||||||||||   daefr 2 ehci1 23
> =++>   37 prcfr  4130 
> cpu0:timer
> 42 dtbuf  314 totfr 15799 re0 256
> Namei Name-cache   Dir-cache142271 desvn  react  4131 
> cpu1:timer
>Callshits   %hits   % 87941 numvn  pdwak  4129 
> cpu3:timer
> 61585762  94 35563 frevn  pdpgs  4130 
> cpu2:timer
>   intrn
> Disks   ad0   da0 pass0298480 wire
> KB/t  18.79  0.00  0.00193600 act
> tps  12 0 0   2103500 inact
> MB/s   0.22  0.00  0.00  9180 cache
> %busy 0 0 0   1386692 free
> 
> 
> # vmstat -i
> interrupt  total   rate
> irq1: atkbd02536  0
> irq14: ata0  8516926  9
> irq16: ehci0  2233740154   2585
> irq23: ehci1 2594742  3
> cpu0:timer3562265448   4122
> irq256: re0   2291967374   2652
> cpu1:timer3562481709   4123
> cpu3:timer3479157511   4026
> cpu2:timer3555645238   4115
> Total18696371638  21638
> 
> thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: X on Xterminals but not on console

2011-10-06 Thread Manolis Kiagias

On 6/10/2011 6:24 μμ, n dhert wrote:

Hi,
In your labserver, do you have a graphical login window at your labserver or
not ?
I don't want a graphical login, since I can't get anymore to the login
prompt via Ctrl Alt F1


No graphical login. My lab server stops at the console login prompt.


In KDM, the config directory is /usr/local/share/config/kdm  for kdm window
manager, there is no
Xservers file, and I can't see any file .. there are Xaccess, Xwilling,
Xstartup, Xreset, Xsession files
and a large kdmrc file. There are no man pages for kdm, kdm-bin, Xaccess,
etc...

I tried setting ServerCmd=""  instead of ServerCmd=/usr/local/bin/X -br  in
the  kdmrc file ...
Now I only have /usr/local/bin/kdm-bin running, not /usr/local/bin/X



Don't really know how KDM handles this. You could however - as a last 
resort - disable KDM and use xdm as your login manager. It is a bit 
"rough" (see login screens here 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonic2000gr/5033230929/in/set-72157625053818002) 
but it can start up any GUI using a simple .xsession file (xdm is not 
installed along with X but it is a very small port, x11/xdm).



Am I right to believe the primary role of a local X server (local= on
labserver) is to have a graphical environment on that labserver machine ?



Yes, absolutely. There is no need to run a GUI on the lab server. It's a 
waste of CPU cycles and memory.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


www/libxul update distfile?

2011-10-06 Thread Peter Vereshagin
Hello.

A week ago the portaudit alert came for mozilla products. I updated
www/firefox36 and mail/thunderbird3 ports but still no www/libxul in the
ports.

I suppose I need the 1.9.2.23 version:

http://portaudit.freebsd.org/1fade8a3-e9e8-11e0-9580-4061862b8c22.html

But I can't even find a source package:

   https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=xulrunner-1.9.2.23.source.tar.bz2

I don't think I should get it from fedora's git's 'lookaside cache'. Or should
I?

Thank you.

--
Peter Vereshagin  (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Samba

2011-10-06 Thread Chris Brennan
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Kruppa, Peter Ulrich
 wrote:

 [snip]
>>
> Just one idea:
> did you activate the firewall on your Windows client somehow? That might
> happen during some kind of updates and block samba from client side.
>

Nope, SEP says 139 is allowed, the one thing I haven't done yet is a reboot
of that windows client, I will try that later today.

> --
> Chris Brennan
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/
> GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8  9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C)


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 8.0 -> PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote:
> Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a
> FreeBSD server to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ? I am assuming downloading
> the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling will do it? Any
> advice, samples would be appreciated

8.0 is out of support now as I recall.  Recommend upgrading to 8.2 --
you should be able to update the base system independently of updating
any ports as the ABI won't change because it's all the same major
version number.

Update your ports tree to the latest.  Update your installed ports to
the latest available.  You can omit upgrading PHP and things like
eaccelerator since you'll be deleting and reinstalling them shortly.

Make backups of all of your PHP related ports.  Take note of which are
the actual applications you want to run -- there are some differences in
the available modules between the php52 and the php5 ports, so it won't
necessarily be an exact one-for-one swap.

Now remove the base php52 port and every port that depends on it.
Install the core lang/php5 port -- this resets the default PHP version
on your system -- then reinstall your applications, allowing them to add
any necessary modules automatically to fulfil their dependencies.  If
your PHP application code is not installed via ports, then you'll have
to manually work out which modules to install -- this is likely to be
pretty similar to what you needed with php52 but not necessarily exactly
the same.  Usually it's a matter of installing a bunch of stuff, trying
the application, noting what throws errors due to missing functions and
installing the needed modules to provide that.  Rinse, repeat.

This is safe, in that you should end up with a functioning system, but
it is pretty intrusive and requires significant amounts of downtime on
your system.  To minimize all that, probably the best thing to do is
clone your web server into a jail or VM, work on the upgrade there at
your leisure, including all needed debugging.  Then you should be able
to make packages of all the ports in your test system and use those to
quickly apply the changes to your live system.

This is a key command-line you'll need for that:

   pkg_create -Rbn portname

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: FreeBSD 8.0 -> PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Paul Macdonald

On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote:

Hi all,
Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server 
to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ?
I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling 
will do it?
Any advice, samples would be appreciated,
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

It's not too traumatic an upgrade, and initially is as simple as you 
suggest,
remember  to uninstall extenstions via the meta port 
lang/php52-extensions (and reinstall desired extensions via 
lang/php5-extensions)


further suggestions, *
*copy the config make options from phpinfo() on 5.2 as it'll help you 
remember what you need for 5.3.

keep a copy of you php.ini obv also.
check http://uk3.php.net/migration53

you'll likely know but 5.3 is quite different from 5.2 so there's a few 
gotchas, such as  changes to log levels, no more register globals, you 
must explicitly use $_POST or $_GET

no more register_long_arrays, you cannot use $HTTP_POST_VARS
short tags are probably off  round about that version,

if i recall, there was some changes to a lot of my $_SESSION code so 
check any code that uses that, (but this could well have been my 
implementations.)




good luck
Paul.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Failing to build multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg

2011-10-06 Thread Open Slate
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Frank Shute  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:35:58PM -1000, Open Slate wrote:
> >
> > Failing to build multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg
> >
> > --->  Upgrading 'gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.11_1' to 'gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.12'
> > (multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg)
> > --->  Building '/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg'
> > ===>  Cleaning for gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.12
> > gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.12: Makefile error: you cannot include
> > bsd.port[.pre].mk twice
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg.
> > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
> > /tmp/portupgrade20111005-1444-s8mm5a-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
> > UPGRADE_PORT=gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.11_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=0.10.11_1 make
> > ** Fix the problem and try again.
> >
> > Full Makefile below. Near the end I see
> >
> > .include 
> >
> > followed closely by
> >
> > .include 
> >
> > Perhaps one of these was supposed to be excluded via a conditional? I tried
> > commenting each one out but neither form builds successfully. The date on
> > the makefile header is not new but the port was recently updated.
> >
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD myhostname 8.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27
> > 18:07:27 UTC 2011
> > r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> >  i386
> >
> > The Makefile in multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg:
> >
> > # New ports collection makefile for: gstreamer ffmpeg
> > # Date created: Thu Feb 26 20:10:39 CET 2004
> > # Whom: Koop Mast 
> > #
> > # $FreeBSD: ports/multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg/Makefile,v 1.43 2011/10/05
> > 23:05:41 bapt Exp $
> > #    $MCom: ports/multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg/Makefile,v 1.14 2006/07/20
> > 13:40:27 ahze Exp $
> > #
> >
> > PORTNAME= gstreamer
> > PORTVERSION= 0.10.12
> > CATEGORIES= multimedia
> > MASTER_SITES= http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src/gst-ffmpeg/
> > PKGNAMESUFFIX= -ffmpeg
> > DISTNAME= gst-ffmpeg-${PORTVERSION}
> >
> > MAINTAINER= multime...@freebsd.org
> > COMMENT= GStreamer plug-in for manipulating MPEG video streams
> >
> > LICENSE= GPLv2
> >
> > BUILD_DEPENDS= yasm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/yasm
> > LIB_DEPENDS= orc-0.4.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/orc
> >
> > USE_BZIP2= yes
> > USE_GMAKE= yes
> > USE_LDCONFIG= yes
> > USE_GSTREAMER= yes
> > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
> > FFMPEG_CONFIG= --cc=${CC} \
> > --enable-runtime-cpudetect \
> > --enable-pic
> > LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-Bsymbolic
> > CFLAGS+= -fno-force-addr
> > CONFIGURE_ENV= PKG_CONFIG=${PKG_CONFIG}
> >
> > PLIST_SUB= VERSION="${GST_VERSION}"
> >
> > PKG_CONFIG?="${LOCALBASE}/bin/pkg-config"
> > GST_VERSION=${PORTVERSION:C/..$//}
> >
> > # sse hardware vector support
> > .if defined(MACHINE_CPU) && (${MACHINE_CPU:Msse} == "sse" ||
> > ${MACHINE_CPU:Mamd64} == "amd64")
> > WITH_BUILTIN_VECTOR= yes
> > .else
> > FFMPEG_CONFIG+= --disable-sse
> > .endif
> >
> > # mmx support
> > .if defined(MACHINE_CPU) && ${MACHINE_CPU:Mmmx} == "" &&
> > ${MACHINE_CPU:Mamd64} == ""
> > FFMPEG_CONFIG+= --disable-mmx
> > WITHOUT_BUILTIN_VECTOR= yes
> > .endif
> >
> > # builtin vector, requires mmx and sse
> > .if !defined(WITHOUT_BUILTIN_VECTOR) && defined(WITH_BUILTIN_VECTOR)
> > CFLAGS+= -msse
> > .endif
> >
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-ffmpeg-extra-configure="${FFMPEG_CONFIG}"
> >
> > .include 
> >
> > .if ${OSVERSION} < 900033
> >
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/as:${PORTSDIR}/devel/binutils
> > MAKE_ENV= COMPILER_PATH=${LOCALBASE}/bin
> >
> > .endif
> >
> > .include 
>
> See:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161316
>
> It looks like it's been fixed, so csup/portsnap your ports tree
> and try to build it again.

Thanks, that did it. Now I can't build math/mpfr, error fetching the
tarball. If it's not one thing, it's another. Maybe tomorrow ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


OT: how to tell when i've hit a Fn key?

2011-10-06 Thread Gary Kline

I've got a 103-key keyboard.  most  of them produce the right WAV
file.  i was having some trouble with the arrow key, but think i've
found a resolution.  next are the Function key, F1 to F12. 

anybody on-list familiar with curses and can help me  with this?
right now, most of the function keys output 4 clicks [!].  

thanks in advance,

gary


-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
   Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
  The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OT: how to tell when i've hit a Fn key?

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:41:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> 
> I've got a 103-key keyboard.  most  of them produce the right WAV
> file.  i was having some trouble with the arrow key, but think i've
> found a resolution.  next are the Function key, F1 to F12. 
> 
> anybody on-list familiar with curses and can help me  with this?
> right now, most of the function keys output 4 clicks [!].  

I generally use tack for verifying the function-keys against the terminal
description.  (I don't recall seeing a port for tack, but it can probably
be built starting with ncurses-devel, though I haven't tried that, since
I build development versions of ncurses outside the ports).

For _seeing_ the codes, it helps to type ^V (lnext) right before pressing
a given key, making the escape character visible.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgpkRPxeLad9y.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Gribētu pačukstēt Mis Skaistule..

2011-10-06 Thread Judins Dmitrijs
Hei, hei!

Esi taču kaut ko saņēmis info par noslēpumaino Mis Seksīgās līnijas konkursu? 
Pat, ja neesi, nekas!

Tu vari būt patiešām pārliecināts, ka sievietes bija trakoti seksuālas un 
kārdinošiem apaļumiem vajadzīgajās vietās! 

Ja vēlies viņas satikt dzīvē un drusciņ apčamdīt...  

nu tad sāc ar: http://sailinmalta.com/wp-content/uploads/last.php

Homka Jevdokija

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: nan/inf in WCPU of ps / top

2011-10-06 Thread Gautam Mani
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Gautam Mani  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On one virtual machine (qemu on cygwin) running RELENG_8 (csupped around
> 12.Sep.11) -- I noticed:
>
> $ ps aux
> USER PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ   RSS  TT  STAT STARTED  TIME COMMAND
> root   0  nan  0.1 064  ??  DLs   8:39PM   0:00.66 [kernel]
> root  10  nan  0.0 0 8  ??  DL8:39PM   0:00.00 [audit]
> root   1  nan  0.4  2912   472  ??  ILs   8:39PM   0:00.15 /sbin/init
> --
> root  11  inf  0.0 016  ??  RL8:39PM  10:26.08 [idle]
> root  12  nan  0.1 0   120  ??  WL8:39PM   0:07.22 [intr]
> 
>
> even top has this problem:
>
> Any pointers how I can get my WCPU values back -- its a little difficult if
> I cannot sort by WCPU in top.
>
> Hi,

Does anyone have an idea about this? Any other qemu users see this kind of
behaviour ?

Thanks
Gautam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OT: how to tell when i've hit a Fn key?

2011-10-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 07:37:25PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:37:25 -0400
> From: Thomas Dickey 
> Subject: Re: OT: how to tell when i've hit a Fn key?
> To: Gary Kline 
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:41:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > 
> > I've got a 103-key keyboard.  most  of them produce the right WAV
> > file.  i was having some trouble with the arrow key, but think i've
> > found a resolution.  next are the Function key, F1 to F12. 
> > 
> > anybody on-list familiar with curses and can help me  with this?
> > right now, most of the function keys output 4 clicks [!].  
> 
> I generally use tack for verifying the function-keys against the terminal
> description.  (I don't recall seeing a port for tack, but it can probably
> be built starting with ncurses-devel, though I haven't tried that, since
> I build development versions of ncurses outside the ports).
> 
> For _seeing_ the codes, it helps to type ^V (lnext) right before pressing
> a given key, making the escape character visible.
> 

Hm.  no joy in mudville.  i know the first byte ia an
ESC [ '\033].  the last, for F1, is an A.  the others are
hidden.


i'll check ncurses-devel and see w hat it has.  REAL code
helps in stuff like this... .


> -- 
> Thomas E. Dickey
> http://invisible-island.net
> ftp://invisible-island.net



-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
   Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
  The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


kdm with no local X starting

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
When starting /usr/local/bin/kdm (e.g. from /etc/ttys), this starts kdm-bin
(KDM window manager)
but also a local X server.
On a server machine this often is not needed.
How to configure xdm to not start a local X server?
So far I came up only with
# vi /usr/local/share/config/kdm/kdmrc
ServerCmd=""
(instead of ServerCmd=/usr/local/bin/X -br)

but there are probably more clean ways ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FBSD82 sec patch -p4, uname still -p3

2011-10-06 Thread n dhert
I just applied security patch -p4 (last week -p3) to a freebsd 8.2 system
(generic kernel)
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
# ls -la /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
has date of today and contains
REVISION="8.2"
BRANCH="RELEASE-p4"
reboot
# uname -r
8.2-RELEASE-p3
still shows -p3 not -p4
# uname -a
FreeBSD mcsbu.cde.ua.ac.be 8.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep
27 18:45:57 UTC 2011
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64

why?
-p4 was a small patch to linux emulation mode, which I don't have installed
is this why it is still -p3 ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"