Re: tar(1) and --uid/--gid on 9.0-RELEASE
Devin Teske schreef op 08-03-2012 3:01: I see in the tar(1) man-page on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE two options that I would like to use: --uid # --gid # [...] % tar cf some_archive.tar --gid 0 --uid 0 somedir tar: Option --gid is not supported ... When I look through the list of options in the source (http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/usr.bin/tar/cmdline.c?revision=227445&view=markup), I do not see those options. Bug? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Raspberry Pi
On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote: On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:35:47PM -0500, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet. The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due to the binary blob. Okay, that makes sense. Thanks. If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know (perhaps with URIs or contact information for people and projects working on this). There was a discussion about it over on hackers@ last November. The thread starts at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-November/036742.html TL;DR summary: some are wildly in favour of it, others are completely negative. I.e. the usual network response to anything :-} Unless someone capable and willing to do the port managed to get one of the first production batch, the next lot won't be available for 7-8 weeks at the earliest. My order is currently expected to be delivered the second week in May. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: Some questions about Link Aggregation and Failover
>From your switch, run the following tests: core1.drt.hi-media#test etherchannel load-balance interface port-channel 2 ip 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 Would select Gi1/1/1 of Po2 core1.drt.hi-media#test etherchannel load-balance interface port-channel 2 ip 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.9 Would select Gi2/1/1 of Po2 core1.drt.hi-media#test etherchannel load-balance interface port-channel 2 ip 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.10 Would select Gi2/1/1 of Po2 Of course, you'll want to adjust with your own servers and PC IP addresses. On 3/8/12 9:33 AM, bo wang wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: bo wang > Date: 2012/3/8 > Subject: Re: Some questions about Link Aggregation and Failover > To: n...@hdk5.net > > > Hello: > Please see the picture 1 that is my test before.Doing 2 group in > c3750.When I use PC and server2 to connect server1 fpt server for > download. I find the server1 just use 1 port of lagg, other ports > don't work. > Then I change my test , picture2 is showed. I do only 1 group in > c3750 for server1. And do the same test.I find that there are two > ports of lagg work.The lagg0 top speed can be 140MB/s (server2 speed > is 100MB/S, PC speed is 40MB/s) It can increase top speed. > So what can I do for doinig two group in a switch? > > > > 2012/3/8 bo wang : >> Sorry,I can't understand what your meaning. >> >> Switch#show etherchannel >>Channel-group listing: >>-- >> >> Group: 1 >> -- >> Group state = L2 >> Ports: 2 Maxports = 16 >> Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 16 >> Protocol: LACP >> Minimum Links: 0 >> >> Group: 2 >> -- >> Group state = L2 >> Ports: 2 Maxports = 16 >> Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 16 >> Protocol: LACP >> Minimum Links: 0 >> >> >> Switch#show etherchannel detail >>Channel-group listing: >>-- >> >> Group: 1 >> -- >> Group state = L2 >> Ports: 2 Maxports = 16 >> Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 16 >> Protocol: LACP >> Minimum Links: 0 >>Ports in the group: >>--- >> Port: Gi1/0/1 >> >> >> Port state= Up Mstr Assoc In-Bndl >> Channel group = 1 Mode = Active Gcchange = - >> Port-channel = Po1 GC = - Pseudo port-channel = Po1 >> Port index= 0 Load = 0x00Protocol = LACP >> >> Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs F - Device is sending fast >> LACPDUs. >>A - Device is in active mode.P - Device is in passive mode. >> >> Local information: >>LACP port Admin OperPortPort >> Port Flags State Priority Key Key Number State >> Gi1/0/1 SA bndl 32768 0x1 0x1 0x102 0x3D >> >> Partner's information: >> >> LACP portAdmin Oper PortPort >> Port Flags Priority Dev ID AgekeyKeyNumber >> State >> Gi1/0/1 SA 32768 0010.18c0.af20 24s0x00x250 0x3 0x3D >> >> Age of the port in the current state: 12d:22h:41m:09s >> >> Port: Gi1/0/2 >> >> >> Port state= Up Mstr Assoc In-Bndl >> Channel group = 1 Mode = Active Gcchange = - >> Port-channel = Po1 GC = - Pseudo port-channel = Po1 >> Port index= 0 Load = 0x00Protocol = LACP >> >> Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs F - Device is sending fast >> LACPDUs. >>A - Device is in active mode.P - Device is in passive mode. >> >> Local information: >>LACP port Admin OperPortPort >> Port Flags State Priority Key Key Number State >> Gi1/0/2 SA bndl 32768 0x1 0x1 0x103 0x3D >> >> Partner's information: >> >> LACP portAdmin Oper PortPort >> Port Flags Priority Dev ID AgekeyKeyNumber >> State >> Gi1/0/2 SA 32768 0010.18c0.af20 26s0x00x250 0x4 0x3D >> >> Age of the port in the current state: 12d:22h:41m:15s >> >>Port-channels in the group: >>--- >> >> Port-channel: Po1(Primary Aggregator) >> >> >> >> Age of the Port-channel = 12d:22h:41m:21s >> Logical slot/port = 10/1 Number of ports = 2 >> HotStandBy port = null >> Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse >> Protocol= LACP >> Port security = Disabled >> >> Ports in the Port-channel: >> >> Index Load Port EC stateNo of bits >> --+--+--+--+--- >> 0 00 Gi1/0/1 Active 0 >> 0 00 Gi1/0/2 Active 0 >> >> Time since last port bundled:12d:22h:41m:17sGi1/0/1 >> >> Group:
pwcview(1) don't work
Hi to all, I have: > pkg_info | grep webc evolution-webcal-2.32.0_1 Webcal(endar) handler for gnome pwcview-1.4.1_4 The Video4Linux PWC webcam viewer webcamd-3.2.0.2 A port of Linux USB webcam and DVB drivers into userspace > kldstat | grep cuse 31 0xc12a4000 5c08 cuse4bsd.ko casa# webcamd -d ugen4.6 -i 0 -v 0 : v3.2:USB Acecad Flair tablet driver : v2.3 (May 2, 2007):Aiptek HyperPen USB Tablet Driver (Linux 2.6.x) : Bryan W. Headley/Chris Atenasio/Cedric Brun/Rene van Paassen GTCO usb driver version: 2.00.0006: v0.0.2:USB KB Gear JamStudio Tablet driver : v1.52:USB Wacom tablet driver lirc_dev: IR Remote Control driver registered, major 14 IR NEC protocol handler initialized IR RC5(x) protocol handler initialized IR RC6 protocol handler initialized IR JVC protocol handler initialized IR Sony protocol handler initialized IR RC5 (streamzap) protocol handler initialized IR LIRC bridge handler initialized : 2.2.1:ATI/X10 RF USB Remote Control Linux video capture interface: v2.00 em28xx driver loaded Em28xx: Initialized (Em28xx dvb Extension) extension USBVision USB Video Device Driver for Linux : 0.9.11 pvrusb2: V4L in-tree version:Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-USB2 MPEG2 Encoder/Tuner pvrusb2: Debug mask is 31 (0x1f) cpia2: V4L-Driver for Vision CPiA2 based cameras v3.0.1 : Zoran 364xx au0828 driver loaded USB Video Class driver (1.1.1) : 0.4.7:D-Link DSB-R100 USB FM radio driver : 0.0.2: A driver for the TEA5764 radio chip for EZX Phones. b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully dib0700: loaded with support for 21 different device-types virtual DVB server adapter driver, version 1.0-hps, (c) 2011 Hans Petter Selasky Attached ugen4.6[0] to cuse unit 0 em28xx: New device @ 480 Mbps (eb1a:2820, interface 0, class 0) em28xx #0: chip ID is em2820 (or em2710) em28xx #0: board has no eeprom em28xx #0: found i2c device @ 0x4a [saa7113h] em28xx #0: Your board has no unique USB ID. em28xx #0: A hint were successfully done, based on i2c devicelist hash. em28xx #0: This method is not 100% failproof. em28xx #0: If the board were missdetected, please email this log to: em28xx #0: V4L Mailing List em28xx #0: Board detected as EM2860/SAA711X Reference Design em28xx #0: Identified as EM2860/SAA711X Reference Design (card=19) em28xx #0: Config register raw data: 0x00 em28xx #0: v4l2 driver version 0.1.3 em28xx #0: V4L2 video device registered as video0 em28xx_dvb: This device does not support the extension Creating /dev/video0 casa# chmod 666 /dev/video0 casa# And, can't play /dev/video0 : > pwcview Webcam set to: 320x240 (sif) at 5 fps libv4l2: error queuing buf 0: Invalid argument libv4l2: error queuing buf 1: Invalid argument libv4l2: error queuing buf 2: Invalid argument libv4l2: error queuing buf 3: Invalid argument libv4l2: error reading: Device busy Error reading from webcam: Device busy > Somebody can help me ? Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Port installation problem
I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question. I am having problrems installing ports the ones that fail always do so with same problem: Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/Login Failure On ttyv1 I have looked to see if i can change the ftp site, i cannot ping ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk net unreachable but can ping it without the cs in it. Thanks Matthew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Port installation problem
On 08/03/2012 11:24, ellip...@elliptic.plus.com wrote: > I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question. I am having > problrems installing ports the ones that fail always do so with same > problem: > > Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/Login Failure On > ttyv1 > > I have looked to see if i can change the ftp site, i cannot ping > ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk net unreachable but can ping it without the cs in it. I guess you're trying to install something to do with X.org, as ftp.cs.cuhk.edu.hk is only listed under MASTER_SITE_XORG. It seems that server may be down -- for the time being at least -- however, there are several other mirrors around the world that the ports could use instead. For most 'site down' type errors, if you just wait patiently, the ports should eventually try the next server in sequence. However, if that doesn't work, you could try adding[*] MASTER_SORT=.uk RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES= yes to /etc/make.conf -- this should cause the ports to try and download from a different server initially. The '.uk. MASTER_SORT probably won't help very much here, as although ftp.mirrorservice.org is on the MASTER_SITE_XORG list, as you can see, it doesn't have '.uk' in its URL. The obvious substitution to get mirrorservice.org to sort first is left as an exercise... Cheers, Matthew [*] Assuming you're in the UK, as you're using plus.com -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RE: Still having trouble with package upgrades
Da= vid, Sorry for top posting - my 'phone makes it difficult. Do= we really have to have this debate again? You made the same points = a short while ago, and there was a long on-list debate about the strengths = and shortfalls of the existing ports and packages system. I don't se= e what value is added by having that debate again? I have certainly = been able to do binary package updates between releases in the past, so I c= an't agree that it doesn't work at all. Be that as it may, if you ca= n't or won't contribute programming time, money, or server resources to cre= ate the kind of package system you're talking about I don't see how it help= s to continually harangue the user community about your wish to make FreeBS= D work like Debian. Regards, -- Peter Harrison From:= David Jackson Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 16:29 To:<= /b> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Still having trouble w= ith package upgrades I still have yet to find a resolution to= the problems I have had with binary packages and upgrades on FreeBSD= . Binary upgrading is broken with every tool I have tried. = There is no real reason why FreeBSD should not provide a facility fo r users to be able to binary upgrade to the most recent version of al= l packages with a simple upgrade command. One faulty arg= ument I heard was that it is often not a good idea to upgrade to new = software release. The whole purpose of having a release cycle for pro= grams is to provide stable, tested releases for the public to install that will will work properly, and improve upon and fix problems with older= releases. This is why mainline release are differentiated from betas and the CVS downloads which are experimental. So you really do want = the most recent release, especially for corrections to any security p= roblem. Making upgrades more difficult actually makes the system more= insecure by exposing people for a long time to security problems tha= t were fixed in software but making it difficult for people to upgrad= e. As for the security issues of downloading binary pac= kages. The fact is source packages are not safer than binary packages= , more on that in a bit. I am astonished that people here would not r= ealise the obvious, having safe binary installs is do-able from mirro= r sites, just have the package management software download MD5s from= many mirror sites, compare them and test the downloaded package, is = they are off, then the package will not be installed the user will be= prompted to allow a notification of the problem to be sent to the Fr= eeBSD administrators. The fact is, binary releases are no more danger= ous than source releases, someone could just as easily insert bad cod= e in a source code package on a mirror, you need automated MD5 checki= ng anyway, for both binary or source upgrades. So the idea that sourc= e upgrades are safer is false, just dead wrong. As for compile= options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature options and = the most commonly used settings into the binary packages, for the sta= ndard i386 CPU. If people want customisations then they can build the= software for themselves. A good software philosophy is to all= ow software to work out of the box with as little configuration as po= ssible, but allow everything to be configured by the user if they wan= t, by shipping software with reasonable defaults which can be overrid= den by the user. Make simple things easy and complicated things doabl= e. In GUI, by default, complexity can be hidden from users, but if pe= ople want fine grain control, they should be free to use advanced scr= eens of the GUI to get complex, fine grained control. In GUI design, = more commonly used settings can be provided more upfront while advanc= ed features for use by experts can be placed deeper in advanced or ex= pert screens oft the GUI. Everything should be able to be configured or <= br>accomplished by both GUI and CLI and API. A good user frien= dly model for a useable OS is to allow for binary packages of the ent= ire system to be upgraded with a single upgrade command. It should wo= rk out of the box without hassle. Keeping software up to date to rece= nt releases is good practice, remember what I said about the purpose of <= br>software releases. make it easy. why dont the freebsd admin= istrators just have a build machine that automatically compiles the s= oftware and makes them available as the ports are updated. <= br>The user should be able to keep their system up to date without doing a= ny system wide all at once OS-release upgrades at all. There is no re ason why kernel and
Capturing Information About PANIC
I am having problems with my system panicking and crashing during Bacula backups. Is there any way short of enabling full memory dumps to log the output of the crash? After a reboot there is no information in the messages log, and dmesg generally only shows the information since the reboot started. The system is running FreeBSD9.0-RELEASE compiled from source, I had it running bacula backups for close to 2 weeks without a problem, but now it consistently crashes every night. The system is running the client directory and storage daemon, oddly enough it never crashes when backing up itself, but instead crashes when backing up one of the two remote systems. I was beginning to think that perhaps my recompile using clang was the problem, so I rebuilt the world and all ports without clang but the problem persists. I have tested my external eSATA drive on another system, and temporarily connected the drive to the internal SATA ports to rule out the eSATA controller and the backup drive as the source of the problems. This is the only drive in the system that is setup with GEOM_ELI encryption, so I can't rule out that the encryption process is causing a load that the motherboard/CPU/RAM is failing to cope with for hardware reasons. Though this system shouldn't have a problem keeping up. FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #1: Tue Mar 6 18:42:48 CST 2012 dweimer@webmail.dweimer.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VESAKERN amd64 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 7750 Dual-Core Processor (2700.06-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x100f23 Family = 10 Model = 2 Stepping = 3 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x802009 AMD Features=0xee500800 AMD Features2=0x7ff TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory = 3843878912 (3665 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 ACPI APIC Table: <072309 APIC1220> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 cryptosoft0: on motherboard -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
question about SMTP-authentication
To whom it may concern: Hello, may I need your help about SMTP authentication? Problems: = SMTP-authen doesn't functioning, when I use ThunderBird I try to set authentication method as Kerberos/GSSAPI or Encrypted password, it doesn't work. Background: === I'm intermediate FreeBSD sysadmin. I used to run only normal mail service in my company, which use POP3 on myserver and SMTP from ISP. Now my ISP always get problem, so I prefer to set SMTP service on my server and provide to staffs in company. However to set pure SMTP is not safe, then I prefer to use SMTP-authenicate. Setup Reference == 1. I read the how to setup from FreeBSD Handbook (online)-> Chapter 29 Electronic Mail -> 29.10 SMTP Authentication from freebsd.org 2. setup for cyrus-sasl2 was fine (setup via usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2) 3. setup for openssl was 90% fine (setup via port) reference to FreeBSD Handbook (online)->Chapter 15 Security -> 15.8 OpenSSL accept the "STARTTLS" line doesn't appear as mention on the last part of article. Raw info for considers from /var/log/maillog --- revip2.asianet.co.th is my provider , the dmaccess.co.th is my server Mar 8 22:35:35 ns1 sendmail[18640]: q28MZZ4l018640: ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4 Mar 8 22:37:29 ns1 sendmail[18644]: q28MbSv3018644: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=, relay=ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248], reject=550 5.7.1 Mar 8 22:37:34 ns1 sendmail[18644]: q28MbSv3018644: from=, size=778, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=IPv4, relay=ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58. Mar 8 22:38:31 ns1 sendmail[18646]: q28McVl2018646: ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4 Mar 8 22:39:55 ns1 sendmail[18650]: q28MdsOC018650: ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4 Mar 8 22:40:57 ns1 sendmail[18688]: q28MevLw018688: ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4 Mar 8 22:42:05 ns1 sendmail[18689]: q28Mffbd018689: ppp-58-8-163-248.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.163.248] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4 from /etc/mail/freebsd.mc -- dnl set SASL options TRUST_AUTH_MECH (`GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl dnl SSL Options define(`confCACERT_PATH',`/etc/ssl')dnl define(`confCACERT',`/etc/ssl/dm_new.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT',`/etc/ssl/dm_new.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY',`/etc/ssl/dm_ca.key')dnl define(`confTLS_SRV_OPTIONS',`V')dnl MAILER(local) MAILER(smtp) Thanks in advance Kamolpat E-mail message checked by Internet Security (7.0.0.508) Database version: 6.19420 http://www.pctools.com/en/internet-security/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Raspberry Pi
The freebsd-arm@ list is where it is being discussed and progressing, don't think anybody has the hardware yet. On 2012-03-07, at 4:40 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:35:47PM -0500, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: >> People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet. >> The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that >> were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due >> to the binary blob. > > Okay, that makes sense. Thanks. > > If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry > Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if > someone would let me know (perhaps with URIs or contact information for > people and projects working on this). > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Mouse disconnecting and reconnecting ...
Hey. I've recently installed 9.0 amd64 and X11 and Gnome. Here is my rc.conf mouse stuff: moused_nondefault_enable="NO" Originally I'd bump the mouse and see it "doing stuff" on the console and although it's a common mouse (a few weeks old) apparently it's regarded as a "non-default" mouse. I notice on the console (ttyv0) the following message repeated over and over (say once a minute or so): ugen4.2: at usbus4 (disconnected) ums0: at uhub4, port 2, addr 2 (disconnected) ugen4.2: at usbus4 ums0: on usbus4 ums0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates ID=0 I don't use mouse on the console so no problem. Anyway, when I use Gnome, if I hover over something that can be clicked or selected ... it will be clicked or selected without me presing the left mouse button - this happens consistently and takes a few seconds. I'm not sure if those two things are connected (the message on the console and the automatic mouse in Gnome) but I'm interested in finding out. dmesg follows. Best wishes. Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor (3013.68-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x100f62 Family = 10 Model = 6 Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x802009 AMD Features=0xee500800 AMD Features2=0x37ff TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory = 4075315200 (3886 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 10, cfce (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pcib0: Length mismatch for 3 range: 2ed0 vs 2ee1 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0xef00-0xef7f mem 0xfb00-0xfbff,0xd000-0xd7ff,0xde00-0xdfff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: on vgapci0 vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io hdac0: mem 0xfcffc000-0xfcff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 pcib2: irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 re0: port 0xde00-0xdeff mem 0xfdfff000-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci2 re0: Using 1 MSI-X message re0: Chip rev. 0x3c00 re0: MAC rev. 0x0040 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow re0: Ethernet address: 6c:f0:49:71:50:6b ahci0: port 0xff00-0xff07,0xfe00-0xfe03,0xfd00-0xfd07,0xfc00-0xfc03,0xfb00-0xfb0f mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02f3ff irq 22 at device 17.0 on pci0 ahci0: AHCI v1.10 with 6 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier supported ahcich0: at channel 0 on ahci0 ahcich1: at channel 1 on ahci0 ahcich2: at channel 2 on ahci0 ahcich3: at channel 3 on ahci0 ahcich4: at channel 4 on ahci0 ahcich5: at channel 5 on ahci0 ohci0: mem 0xfe02e000-0xfe02efff irq 16 at device 18.0 on pci0 usbus0: on ohci0 ohci1: mem 0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 16 at device 18.1 on pci0 usbus1: on ohci1 ehci0: mem 0xfe02c000-0xfe02c0ff irq 17 at device 18.2 on pci0 usbus2: EHCI version 1.0 usbus2: on ehci0 ohci2: mem 0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff irq 18 at device 19.0 on pci0 usbus3: on ohci2 ohci3: mem 0xfe02a000-0xfe02afff irq 18 at device 19.1 on pci0 usbus4: on ohci3 ehci1: mem 0xfe029000-0xfe0290ff irq 19 at device 19.2 on pci0 usbus5: EHCI version 1.0 usbus5: on ehci1 pci0: at device 20.0 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfa00-0xfa0f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 hdac1: mem 0xfe024000-0xfe027fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 isab0: at device 20.3 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pcib3: at device 20.4 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 fwohci0: mem 0xfdeff000-0xfdeff7ff,0xfdef8000-0xfdefbfff irq 22 at device 14.0 on pci3 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:35:48:3c:00:6c:f0:49 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:35:48:6c:f0:49 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:35:48:6c:f0:49 fwip0
Re: question about SMTP-authentication
On 08/03/2012 15:55, kamolpat wrote: > Setup Reference > == > 1. I read the how to setup from FreeBSD Handbook (online)-> Chapter 29 > Electronic Mail -> 29.10 SMTP Authentication from freebsd.org > 2. setup for cyrus-sasl2 was fine (setup via > usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2) > 3. setup for openssl was 90% fine (setup via port) reference to FreeBSD > Handbook (online)->Chapter 15 Security -> 15.8 OpenSSL > accept the "STARTTLS" line doesn't appear as mention on the last > part of article. > Did you rebuild sendmail with the right flags so that it would enable all the SASL bits? Apart from that you seem to have done all the right stuff that I can see. You need to add this to /etc/make.conf: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 and then rebuild sendmail -- assuming you have system sources installed: # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail # make clean # make # make install If you haven't got the system sources installed, then you can get them easily enough with csup(1) or freebsd-update(8) or several other ways. Or you could just install sendmail from ports -- obviously, make sure to choose the option to enable SASL in the config dialogue. If you use the ports sendmail, so long as you set up mailer.conf(5) to point to the ports version -- like so: lucid-nonsense:/etc/mail:% cat mailer.conf # $FreeBSD: stable/8/etc/mail/mailer.conf 93858 2002-04-05 04:25:14Z gshapiro $ # # Execute the "real" sendmail program, named /usr/local/sbin/sendmail # sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail send-mail /usr/local/sbin/sendmail mailq /usr/local/sbin/sendmail newaliases /usr/local/sbin/sendmail hoststat/usr/local/sbin/sendmail purgestat /usr/local/sbin/sendmail and put the following in /etc/make.conf so it uses the latest configuration file bits: SENDMAIL_CF_DIR=/usr/local/share/sendmail/cf MAKEMAP=/usr/local/sbin/makemap then the ports sendmail is pretty much a drop-in replacement for the system one, and you can use all the config bits in /etc/mail in exactly the same way as normal. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: question about SMTP-authentication
kamolpat wrote: > To whom it may concern: I hope you get a more useful reply than mine later, & no time here, sorry but I've had SASL-1 running fine for years FreeBSD both ends. Documented here, http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/txt/sasl.html There's various URLs there to SASL-2 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Raspberry Pi
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:51:03AM +, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > >If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry > >Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if > >someone would let me know (perhaps with URIs or contact information for > >people and projects working on this). > > There was a discussion about it over on hackers@ last November. The > thread starts at > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-November/036742.html > > TL;DR summary: some are wildly in favour of it, others are > completely negative. I.e. the usual network response to anything :-} I'm curious about the reasoning for the negative. I'll have to go skim that thread. Thanks for pointing it out to me. > > Unless someone capable and willing to do the port managed to get one > of the first production batch, the next lot won't be available for > 7-8 weeks at the earliest. My order is currently expected to be > delivered the second week in May. That helps me get sort of a timeline in mind, I think. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Raspberry Pi
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:11:53AM -0500, Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > The freebsd-arm@ list is where it is being discussed and progressing, > don't think anybody has the hardware yet. That's another place for me to look for discussion of it. Thanks. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Raspberry Pi
On 03/08/2012 12:46 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:51:03AM +, Arthur Chance wrote: On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote: If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know (perhaps with URIs or contact information for people and projects working on this). There was a discussion about it over on hackers@ last November. The thread starts at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-November/036742.html TL;DR summary: some are wildly in favour of it, others are completely negative. I.e. the usual network response to anything :-} I'm curious about the reasoning for the negative. I'll have to go skim that thread. Thanks for pointing it out to me. The complaints seemed to center around a lack of docs, but I don't think this is still relevant. The fact that several Linux variants are ported suggests plenty of available doc. Also, there is a detailed doc on the Broadcom chip on the RP website. Now, if we could just actuall GET the silly things it would be nice :) -- --- Tim Daneliuk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.4,1.tbz) = fad0512004281ab610544e1daa0ab495 MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.4,1.txz) = aeccf8a14f0ff29bd956c39911eb8fec [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Symlink for release
Gooday. Is symlink "ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/powerpc/powerpc/9.0-RELEASE/"; correct ? The "sysinstall" can't find 9.0-RELEASE. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Capturing Information About PANIC
On 03/09/12 01:45, Dean E. Weimer wrote: I am having problems with my system panicking and crashing during Bacula backups. Is there any way short of enabling full memory dumps to log the output of the crash? After a reboot there is no information in the messages log, and dmesg generally only shows the information since the reboot started. You can enable all.log in syslog.conf (follow the instructions there); this will provide verbose logging of everything at all levels. And you can enable dumpdev in rc.conf. HTH ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
libc regex word-boundary support fallen-off?
I've noticed for some time that claws-mail and less (which I think use libc's regex(3)) don't support word boundaries in searches. I might be delusional, but I think I've used \b in the past in both of those applications in FreeBSD. According to regex(3) it's an implementation POSIX.2, so the feature needn't be supported, but at the bottom of the page it says "word-boundary matching is a bit of a kludge", so presumably it has been. Does anyone know what's going on? I switched from i386 to amd64 last year so it might be something to do with that. I'm currently using 8.2p6. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
realpath(3): a curiosity question
I'm just wondering if anyone knows the rationale behind the differing return codes from realpath() for non-existent paths, depending on whether the non-existent element of a path is at the end of the path or if it occurs somewhere further up the chain. Not asking that it be changed, mind you. Just wondering why it was decided to distinguish between these two cases. From the programmer's perspective, this is something of a minor annoyance, as running a non-existent path through realpath() may or may not return NULL, and therefore still requires additional code to further validate the path returned in the non-NULL case. Granted, the stated purpose of this function is not to verify a path's existence, but nonetheless, having a function that might be called non-deterministic in the results it returns just seems, well, *bad* to me (for lack of a better word at the moment). Does anyone have any idea what the reasoning is behind this design? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
imap server performance benchmarks
I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair laughing when I read the last article on future benchmarking tests to perform: research.microsoft.com/pubs/138302/lisa.pdf Considering I have close to a hundred folders or more, and an average of 50,000 emails in each (yes, not good, and I am working on archiving but it won't help _that_ much) with nearly 200,000 in just one! I got a real kick out of the comment that "no sane email user would have more than 21,000 emails in a folder" - that would make me certifiable :D Oh, and that most email wouldn't be more than a GB or so... mine's edging 6GB already... So, all jokes aside, I contemplated that I would make an ideal test case to the extreme for benchmarking imap servers. Anyone have any suggestions on what to test/how? Anyone have some tools they have created for a similar challenge? I have my own ideas, but if anyone wants me to try something I'd be willing to give it a shot. If anyone has a better idea on which list this should be posted to as well - I considered the lists available (I'm hooked up to most) and couldn't see any better. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: imap server performance benchmarks
On 09/03/2012 03:44, Da Rock wrote: I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair laughing when I read the last article on future benchmarking tests to perform: research.microsoft.com/pubs/138302/lisa.pdf Considering I have close to a hundred folders or more, and an average of 50,000 emails in each (yes, not good, and I am working on archiving but it won't help _that_ much) with nearly 200,000 in just one! I got a real kick out of the comment that "no sane email user would have more than 21,000 emails in a folder" - that would make me certifiable :D Oh, and that most email wouldn't be more than a GB or so... mine's edging 6GB already... So, all jokes aside, I contemplated that I would make an ideal test case to the extreme for benchmarking imap servers. Anyone have any suggestions on what to test/how? Anyone have some tools they have created for a similar challenge? I have my own ideas, but if anyone wants me to try something I'd be willing to give it a shot. If anyone has a better idea on which list this should be posted to as well - I considered the lists available (I'm hooked up to most) and couldn't see any better. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" No IMAP test is as vicious or as thorough as a real life company deciding to change its mail client from one day to the next and counting on IMAP to automagically restore local archives. If the company more or less uses IMAP folder as a share drives it is even better. It happened to me once. Postfix/Dovecot did handle the change quite well, yet some mailboxes took days before the local copy was in sync with IMAP folders. There was about 200GB of mail to download (35 users company) the load average was under 0.25 all the time on an i5 dual core with 8GB of ram. Duplicating a mailbox X times and having X clients doing a local copy of the entire mailbox sounds like a good first test, with mailbox size and number X on par with what you expect to find on your network. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: imap server performance benchmarks
--As of March 9, 2012 12:44:55 PM +1000, Da Rock is alleged to have said: I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair laughing when I read the last article on future benchmarking tests to perform: research.microsoft.com/pubs/138302/lisa.pdf Considering I have close to a hundred folders or more, and an average of 50,000 emails in each (yes, not good, and I am working on archiving but it won't help _that_ much) with nearly 200,000 in just one! I got a real kick out of the comment that "no sane email user would have more than 21,000 emails in a folder" - that would make me certifiable :D Oh, and that most email wouldn't be more than a GB or so... mine's edging 6GB already... So, all jokes aside, I contemplated that I would make an ideal test case to the extreme for benchmarking imap servers. Anyone have any suggestions on what to test/how? Anyone have some tools they have created for a similar challenge? I have my own ideas, but if anyone wants me to try something I'd be willing to give it a shot. --As for the rest, it is mine. No idea, but as someone who recently had to trim one of his mail folders (same setup) as it was having trouble with over 210,000 messages, I'd be interested in your results. ;) Daniel T. STaal --- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Mouse disconnecting and reconnecting ...
On 8 March 2012 12:25, David Walker wrote: > Hey. > > I've recently installed 9.0 amd64 and X11 and Gnome. > > Here is my rc.conf mouse stuff: > > moused_nondefault_enable="NO" > > Originally I'd bump the mouse and see it "doing stuff" on the console > and although it's a common mouse (a few weeks old) apparently it's > regarded as a "non-default" mouse. > > I notice on the console (ttyv0) the following message repeated over > and over (say once a minute or so): > > ugen4.2: at usbus4 (disconnected) > ums0: at uhub4, port 2, addr 2 (disconnected) > ugen4.2: at usbus4 > ums0: 1.10/1.04, addr 2> on usbus4 > ums0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates ID=0 Had an old Micro Soft USB mouse that would simply cease working after an indeterminate amount of time (15 seconds to 40 minutes). Unplugging & re-plugging made it come back. Eventually I mashed it with a hammer, which made me feel immensely better. Also recently bought a wireless USB mouse that worked exactly once. I don't know about anyone else's experience, but USB mouses seem to be pretty hit&miss. I blame george w. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc regex word-boundary support fallen-off?
RW writes: > I've noticed for some time that claws-mail and less (which I think use > libc's regex(3)) don't support word boundaries in searches. I might be > delusional, but I think I've used \b in the past in both of those > applications in FreeBSD. > > According to regex(3) it's an implementation POSIX.2, so the feature > needn't be supported, but at the bottom of the page it says > "word-boundary matching is a bit of a kludge", so presumably it has > been. > > Does anyone know what's going on? > > > I switched from i386 to amd64 last year so it might be something to do > with that. I'm currently using 8.2p6. The only way I have found to do it is [[:<:]] and [[:>:]]. That is very awkward, so I't love to hear of a shorter way. I found them in the re_format(7) manpage. -- Carl Johnsonca...@peak.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Suggestion
Hi guys. Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS project? It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions than Windows, if you just throw away your FreeBSD and join forces with the ReactOS team to accelerate their process. Actually there isnt any single free OS that can be fully trusted, but ReactOS seems to be that one that we all are wating for. Sincerely, Common world's citizen who dont have money to pay Windows and dont trust Linux and any other Unix-based OS. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Suggestion
On 8 March 2012 23:56, Bruno Comerci wrote: > > Hi guys. > > > Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS > project? > It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around > the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions than > Windows, if you just throw away your FreeBSD and join forces with the ReactOS > team to accelerate their process. > > Actually there isnt any single free OS that can be fully trusted, but ReactOS > seems to be that one that we all are wating for. > > > Sincerely, > Common world's citizen who dont have money to pay Windows and dont trust > Linux and any other Unix-based OS. I agree. I've had a bit too much to drink myself. *hic* -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Suggestion
Isn't it illegal to emulate windows OS? I trust FreeBSD by now, though ReactOS is worth researching. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:12 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote: > On 8 March 2012 23:56, Bruno Comerci wrote: > > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the > ReactOS project? > > It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users > around the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions > than Windows, if you just throw away your FreeBSD and join forces with the > ReactOS team to accelerate their process. > > > > Actually there isnt any single free OS that can be fully trusted, but > ReactOS seems to be that one that we all are wating for. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Common world's citizen who dont have money to pay Windows and dont trust > Linux and any other Unix-based OS. > > I agree. I've had a bit too much to drink myself. *hic* > > -- > -- > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Suggestion
888 .d8b. 888 888 d88P" "Y88b888 888 888 88 888 888 88 888 888 88 888 888 88 888 Y88b. .d88P888 "Y8P" 888 888 888 .db. 8b. 888 888 888d88P Y88b888 888 Y88b 888 888 888Y88b. 888 888888 888 888 888 "Y888b. 888 888 d88P 888 888 888"Y88b.888 888P" 888 888 888 "88 888 T88b 888 Y88b. .d88PY88b d88P888 888 T88b "Y8P" "YP" 8 T88b ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
