Known problem with qt3.3?
My portupgrade is failing to build qt33 with this /usr/libexec/elf/ld: libqt-mt.so.3.3.1: undefined versioned symbol name __dynamic_cast@@CXXABI_1.2 /usr/libexec/elf/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value *** Error code 1 --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Known problem with qt3.3?
Your right, 4.9 Release. Everything else is pretty generic At 05:10 PM 4/4/2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 04:52:50PM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote: My portupgrade is failing to build qt33 with this /usr/libexec/elf/ld: libqt-mt.so.3.3.1: undefined versioned symbol name __dynamic_cast@@CXXABI_1.2 /usr/libexec/elf/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value *** Error code 1 You forgot to give any details of your FreeBSD system. Kris ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Known problem with qt3.3?
The KDE folks nailed it, I had a private copy of gcc 3 compiled on the system (for eCos development) and while those tools were not in the path, ldconfig had /usr/local/gnu3/lib in the path so it was picking up libstdc++.so.5 from that directory rather than libstdc++.so.3 from the /usr/lib directory. (bogus in and of itself, since c++ should not have accepted the later version but that appears to have been the problem, my portupgrade since built qt33 and has moved on to kdelibe3. --Chuck At 05:40 PM 4/4/2004, Chuck McManis wrote: Your right, 4.9 Release. Everything else is pretty generic At 05:10 PM 4/4/2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 04:52:50PM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote: My portupgrade is failing to build qt33 with this /usr/libexec/elf/ld: libqt-mt.so.3.3.1: undefined versioned symbol name __dynamic_cast@@CXXABI_1.2 /usr/libexec/elf/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value *** Error code 1 You forgot to give any details of your FreeBSD system. Kris ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: KDE upgrade problem
At 07:26 AM 4/3/2004, you wrote: I'm running KDE 3.1.4 under FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT. I want to upgrade to KDE 3.2.1, and I've tried this a number of ways, using the ports system: I've tried using 'portupgrade kde' and also in smaller chunks like 'portupgrade kdelibs' and 'portupgrade kdebase', and I've tried doing The only way I got it to work was a clean re-install without KDE (bare install) then cvsup, portupgrade of ruby, then build/install of the KDE meta port. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unknown tcp connections to dawsonmail.com
At 04:43 AM 4/1/2004, Lorin Lund wrote: Qwest is my phone company. When I signed up for DSL I opted for and external DSL connection. They supplied an ActionTec router/hub/modem. It has an HTML interface for configuration and it has a limited amount of traffic logging. The log shows the external domain and the internal IP address. There are several Windoze boxes and my FreeBSD box. The ActionTec does NAT. Anything that comes in that isn't a response to an outgoing packet would normally be dropped. Turn off your PCs one by one. You'll have to wait 4 minutes for the TCP connection to timeout, or you can reboot your router. Either way I bet money that at one point there will be a PC turned off and the connection will not get re-asserted. That that PC out back and either crush it with an SUV or load FreeBSD on it, either way will fix the problem :-) (More helpfully go to www.lavasoft.de and get their adaware program for culling such things) --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Server down regularly
At 11:12 AM 4/2/2004, meimi wrote: Actually, what I want to know is the general steps for finding the problems. Step #1 - Look in the message log (/var/log/messages), and ideally a copy of the console output, to see why you server stopped running. (or if your server stopped running) The latter is important because your server can seem to be down when the problem is actually you cannot connect to it (the network is down). If you can log into your server and get a shell prompt, then I would try the command uptime(1) first, to see how long the server thinks its been running, and then start looking at /var/log/messages for reboot messages, and /var/crash for kernel coredumps (if you panic, and have savecore set, it will create a core file there) --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unknown tcp connections to dawsonmail.com
Its a bit confusing because you mention the DSL router and my server as if they are two different machines. If they are, then are they the ONLY two different machines behind the DSL router? Is it possible you have a Windoze PC on your subnet somewhere? Seems that dawsonmail.com is a hostile web site (it attempts to install adware) perhaps you have something connected to it somewhere? --Chuck At 06:44 PM 3/30/2004, Lorin Lund wrote: I have freebsd 5.2 release running on my server. I have apache2 and MySQL installed and running. No other daemons to speak of. Yet my DSL router shows connections to dawsonmail.com. Does anyone have any knowledge or ideas of what might be going on? The DSL router does not show port info. Just the outside domain name and the inside IP address. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hi I have a suggestion! To Imporve the perfect Freebsd!
At 11:18 AM 3/28/2004, Jorn Argelo wrote: Besides, who needs Windows programs anyway? You have everything you want for free, except for games. Hmm, how about something that can do what PhotoShop can do? How about something that can do what AutoCAD or TurboCAD can do? How about something that can do what Protel or Cadence can do? There is unfortunately lots that Windows can do, especially in the design space, that FreeBSD cannot. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hi I have a suggestion! To Imporve the perfect Freebsd!
At 11:58 AM 3/28/2004, Jorn Argelo wrote: True. However, so far you've just mentioned the CAD programs. I don't think that that is a large group when you compare it with the Office users for instance. Come on, lets be fair, if we wanted to limit the application to simply emacs guess what? Freebsd is craploads better than Windows! Whippee! We're #1! FreeBSD offers many options for almost every kind of computer user. I believe that that is important as well. The above statement is not accurate, and believing it to be accurate will limit where FreeBSD can go. FreeBSD offers an option to a small population of users, those who use Windows to do Office tasks. Its also a great environment for the nerdly types who endlessly reinvent computer languages or window system widgets. Unfortunately those same windows users are the most clueless of computer users and cannot appreciate what FreeBSD does differently. The technical community however, THEY can appreciate the difference and they would be able to adopt FreeBSD if it had the tools they needed. These are the folks that made Sun Microsystems what it is today. And if FreeBSD wants a toe hold in the market that is where it will have to establish itself first. Just my 0.02, --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD on first hard drive - Windows on the second, configuring
I don't believe you can configure Windows to boot on anything other than what the BIOS believes is disk 0 (aka Drive C), so set it up such that Windows is on the first drive and FreeBSD is on the second, and have the boot manager or Grub or whatever set up to boot from the other drive. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HP6100 Ethernet fix?
I've got an Omnibook 6100 I'm installing 5.2.1 on, and the ethernet port is not working correctly (dhclient hangs for ever on it). There is some chatter on the Linux lists about a fix from Intel for this particular laptop/chip but I haven't found a FreeBSD equivalent. Anyone know where it might be? --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! why?
At 12:50 PM 3/24/2004, you wrote: Why have you sold my email address to spammers? The [EMAIL PROTECTED] email was a one-time disposable email address that I only ever gave to FreeBSD.org. Now I am receiving spam email targeted at that address. An address I only gave YOU. Any suggestions or response? -Clint Lipinski I doubt anyone sold it, it appeared unprotected in the following page (accessible by google) http://groups.google.com/groups?q=freebsddotorghl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8safe=offselm=200202242210.g1OMA3E20686_freefall.freebsd.org%40ns.sol.netrnum=2 Which is a response to a PR you filed. Before you accuse someone of selling your email address try googling for it, then try googling on netnews for it. You'd be surprised. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 4.9 freezes
Interesting, I was playing around with KDE and compiled the Kjewel source code (its a tetris clone). When I run it, it doesn't have its puzzle pieces, but it also causes the entire window system to completely lock up. No keyboard events appear to be getting through. If I telnet into the system and kill -9 the process, everything comes back to normal. Its a very strange thing that a user process should be able to do that... (this is 4.9 w/ KDE 3.2) --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: disconnecting keyboard: big trouble !?!
At 08:44 AM 3/23/2004, Nathan Kinkade wrote: Can anyone on the list point me to a manufacturers site or documentation that unequivocally states in clear terms the real dangers of hotplugging a PS/2 device? Like some of the other people who have replied, in the past I have hot-plugged many a PS/2 device to no detriment. However, I now only do it if there is no other practical alternative just to be on the safe side. No because you would need the schematic of the mainboard and no manufacturer will give you that (go figure.) Power is supplied on the PS/2 pin and the WinHEC standard calls for there to be a fuse on that supply. If you short the power pin to ground while attempting to plug in something (or while unplugging) and blow that fuse, the motherboard is toast. This is not a user replacable part. (you'd have to find it amongst the many surface mount parts if it wasn't already in the PS/2 shroud, and then you would have to pull just that part off the board. I'm sure if you get the Intel ATX Motherboard documentation (need a signed non-disclosure with Intel) it specifies the size/type of fuse. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: time() segmentation fault
At 09:24 PM 3/21/2004, Abel Navarro wrote:
Hi all,
this program ends with a segmentation fault in a FreeBSD 5.1.2-RELEASE:
main() { time(); }
Good for it! Seeing as time takes a pointer to a time_t, not passing it one
would use what ever happened to be on the stack as a pointer.
I don't have made important changes to the release except cosmetic ones. I'm
running the Linux compatibility module and have compiled with gcc 3.3.3. Any
ideas are welcome.
Change it to
main() { time(0); }
And tell us if it crashes then.
--Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top posting
At 03:24 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote: Top-posting may be an opinion, but RFC 1855 makes it _standard_ opinion. Let's get serious for a minute here. Just because someone wrote up an INFORMATIONAL RFC does NOT make it STANDARD. It makes it INFORMATIONAL. Big difference. Go look up RFC 2026 for what it takes to become a standard. I wonder what it would be like if you went to a cocktail party and before you could say anything in a conversation you first had to say everything that everyone else had said. I suppose you could turn it into a drinking game (if you missed some bit you would be forced to take a drink) but it would only be entertaining for a short time. Netiquette guidelines are like C coding styles, subject to great rip roaring debates. My personal pet peeve is 600 lines of included text only to get to the bottom line which adds This is how I feel about it too. I loved tin(1)'s filter that popped back and said Hmm, more than 50% included text, perhaps you want to either add more content or delete some of the text. Only to have complete morons who would add 20 lines of -- filler text to main tin happy -- lines! Can you believe how stupid that is? No, I didn't think so. But its true. And top posting or bottom posting just including all that text is a complete waste on an archive list like this one since anyone who doesn't get it need only go to the archive to figure it out. Instead a thread like this has easily 10x the character count of the actual characters used in new text. Even good text compression can help that much. So you end up with the servers that archive this for posterity (Hi Mom!) overflowing with redundant information. If you could somehow mandate top posting and train people who want to catch up to read from the bottom up on the first message of the thread they read, then you could archive the entire thread and chop off the messages as soon as you got to a line of included text and the archived version would be completely readable from front to back for posterity. But no one seems to have these sorts of deep thoughts and what we get is, well whatever someone things is best. And as we can see reading this thread, some think one way and some think another. That's my working definition of difference of opinion. :-) That's why generally I scan through the text and extract the content. My comment was merely a counterpoint in the harmony of discussion. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The clock is running too fast
If you're running it on a dual processor then you're taking the clock interrupt on both CPUs and causing time to pass at double time. --Chuck At 08:46 PM 3/18/2004, Stephen Liu wrote: Hi folks, AMD CUP FreeBSD 5.2 The clock on KDE desktop is running on double speed compelling me to adjust it periodically. Kindly advise how to fix this problem. TIA B.R. Stephen Liu ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: KVM Recommendations
Well the Linksys IOGEAR USB one does NOT work well. The usb daemon can't attach both the keyboard and mouse to the PS/2 multiplexor, it sees the keyboard but not the mouse. Its too bad really because otherwise its a very nice switch. --Chuck At 01:56 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote: Hello, Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for kvm unit and drawer ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NVIDIA or ATI
If you get a commercial X server with accelleration support they will provide a driver. There is some older drivers included in the DRI projects site but nothing current for ATI and nVIDIA isn't supporting DRI apparently. --Chuck At 08:18 AM 3/11/2004, you wrote: I feel very happy when I saw in the nvidia site the drivers for linux and of course for FREEBSD, and I need to Know what about ATI and FREEBSD(linux not have problems) drivers because I will acquire a new machine and I need to decide between a ATI or a NVIDIA card for my box and I need to have 3D ACCELERATION. Which should be my choice. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrade kde
I found the easiest way was to start with a clean install, then install cvsup, then cvsup ports, then install portupgrade and then build kde from the ports tree. Took about 32 hours start to finish on a 2.2Ghz Celeron. I wasted about a week trying to do it without re-installing and was unsuccessful. --Chuck At 11:34 PM 3/9/2004, Michael Hollmann wrote: how can i easy upgrade the kde version? my actually version is 3.1.x and would like to upgrade to 3.2 should i use portupgrade? is there a howto for it? thank´s for your help regards michael ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recommend MTA
But it does say: If sendmail works for you, use it. If you have difficulties, use postfix instead. Should I go ahead a learn/setup sendmail? I don't recommend it. Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not only is it everything Postfix aspires to be, it has a zillion hours of runtime under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever because there hasn't been anything to fix. If I had one complaint it would be to do an integration pass over the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create an integrated pop3/mta that could allow for roaming delivery out of the box. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems (Still) Mounting CDROM
At 02:04 AM 3/6/2004, Rishi Chopra wrote: What if the drive is recognized by the BIOS? Then you know its cabled correctly. It can still be misjumpered or bad. FBSD doesn't use the bios functions to talk to the drive. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Users Learning FreeBSD
At 06:00 AM 3/6/2004, Chuck Swiger wrote: Chuck McManis wrote: To put it in perspective, the best way to start USING FreeBSD as opposed to acquiring it to develop with, is probably to by an Apple machine with OS-X installed. All the integration is handled for you. It pains me that there isn't an organization of Apple's caliber providing a complete FreeBSD workstation product that I could load on any machine with a simple install. Apple has some advantages when writing an OS to run on their own hardware; FreeBSD needs to deal with a much wider variation of hardware than Apple does in terms of both quality and complexity. Well until 5.x the FreeBSD problem was no more difficult than the one Microsoft dealt with :-) I agree that if you limit supported configs it makes install easier. I use both MacOS X and FreeBSD on a daily basis; they aren't the same OS nor do they make although knowledge of one is often useful on the other. OS X auto-defaults to installing everything into a single HFS+ partition, which is ideal only in the sense that such an installation avoids having the user make a decision about drive partitioning. That is a good example of a user centric choice. Most application users (non-developers) derive little benefit from having multiple file systems. That being said, my point is not to disagree with you so much as to say that if you think the FreeBSD install should behave differently, you've got the sources: make a few changes to streamline the process and see whether other people like them. And my point was that the primary population of people who would have an opinion would be developers who violently disagree that there should be an easy or dumbed down install process. Did I mention that I also was the manager (acting) for the group that owned Sun Install at Sun 15 years ago ? (God that makes me feel old :-) The current install program has many external similarities to that one. I've heard all of the arguments, no one at Sun would tolerate an EZ installer and I doubt hardly anyone here would as well. Part of the problem is that interaction between installation and the need to have the developers provide hooks for it. The package system is quite good and frankly I think passes muster for both newbie/app user/ and developer alike. The XFree86 configuration/install is pretty horrific if you don't know much about computers (asking for the chip used in the video card? please!) My observation is that this is the sort of battle/change that cannot be manifested in an open source community. If you're familiar with the Cathedral and the Bazaar paper, its impossible to get everyone in the Bazaar to be quiet so that one person might speak to everyone at once. Conversely its impossible in the open source model to have one requirement impart requirements on everyone else. It just isn't in the nature of the community to accept such a constraint, and in parts of the community the hint of something like that generates huge antibodies. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBsd and SCO
Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see ATT vs The Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD source. --Chuck At 03:06 PM 3/6/2004, Raymond Wiegand wrote: Hi I have a question for you ? I purchased FreeBSD from COMP USA and was wondering that seeing that SCO is going after Linux Users will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all based on their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property. I would like to know before i switch all my system over (2) to Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Users Learning FreeBSD
At 12:42 PM 3/6/2004, Joshua Lokken wrote: It doesn't seem like a splash screen can really tell you much about the quality of a piece of software or an OS. No it can't, and for end users its all they care about. Which is how long before I can start using this thing? To put it in perspective, the best way to start USING FreeBSD as opposed to acquiring it to develop with, is probably to by an Apple machine with OS-X installed. All the integration is handled for you. It pains me that there isn't an organization of Apple's caliber providing a complete FreeBSD workstation product that I could load on any machine with a simple install. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems (Still) Mounting CDROM
As far as your kernel is concerned there is no CDROM drive attached to it. You should see something like: atapci0: Intel ICH4 ATA100 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ... snip ... sio1: type 16550A ppc0: parallel port not found. ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad0: 76319MB WDC WD800JB-00CRA1 [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: CDROM ATAPI 44X CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 ... snip ... Note that the last line identifies the CDROM. Now the most common cause of this problem is that the CDROM is set as a SLAVE on the ATA bus and there is no master on that bus. Or sometimes its set as Master w/Slave Present and its waiting for the slave to ack before it does. Either way, its one of (in order of likelyness): drive is mis-jumpered drive is mis-cabled drive is dead HTH --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Keyboard enabling in 5.X
Use a USB keyboard see usbd(8) and ukbd(4) At 11:58 PM 3/3/2004, den wrote: Hi, I have a question about keyboard driver in FreeBSD 5.X. I want to have a possibility to boot my box without keyboard and attach keyboard after system already started. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.9 install disks and USB keyboard?
Boot uses the BIOS calls so you need to set Legacy USB Keyboard support true in the BIOS. Then it works fine. --Chuck At 10:47 AM 3/4/2004, stan wrote: Am I missing a tep here? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache
Look in /var/log/messages to see if its complaining, look in $LOGILES/httpd-access.log to see if it is complaining, look in $LOGFILES/httpd-error.log and see if it is complaining. Generally its pretty good about telling you what is going on. If you left the httpd.conf file at most of its defaults it will have the apache documentation as the file is shows. --Chuck At 02:03 PM 3/2/2004, Michael Banta wrote: I just installed Apache wilthout error. I started apache and did a ps aux. It appears to be running fine. However I cannot bring up the default webpage. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1 processor vs. 2
At 05:53 AM 3/3/2004, Danny Pansters wrote: RAID5 on 3 disks? That's useless. Its only mostly useless. You can't mirror (RAID-1) three drives, so if you want some resiliency you can use RAID-5 and give up one disk to parity and get two disks worth of data. You could even do RAID4 on three disks. 'course 4 disks is generally the minimum most people talk about, but its not completely useless. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
confirmed, my system is messed up :-(
Well, I've confirmed that I've managed to pretty much screw up my system by trying to upgrade to KDE 3.2. I can't get khello world to link. QT 3.2, no libXmu, the ports say libXt is broken and needs to be fixed. sigh. As all I want to do is develop an application for KDE 3.2 (as opposed to work on KDE itself) I'm going to wait and 5.3 or 4.10 comes out and re-install my system from the built packages at that point. Thanks for the pointers on portupgrade and -pufa, even through I ran through portupgrade -pufa (and I've cvsup'd my ports tree) I have yet to get back to a system where I can do development. Good old gcc works fine though. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Swap space - max size
At 08:09 PM 3/2/2004, Jamie wrote: Is there any point in adding more than 2 Gb of swap space on an x86 if you have 2 Gb of ram? 4GB is the virtual address limit, not the physical address limit (which is higher) However if you're swapping a lot on a 2GB system then you're biggest problem is that the entire system is being dragged down to the bandwidth of disk spindle. Not good. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All I want is KDE 3.2
That should be simple, however I'm getting close to looking at a full re-install :-( I'm running 4.8, I made sure I had cvsup'd the ports collection. I tried to download the 4-STABLE packages but trying to add them with pkg_add was giving me fits (some would, some claim that a previous version is installed but neither pkg_update nor pkg_delete can find the old version) I tried to rebuild KDE3.2 from ports, this fails in tk84 at the moment (tk84 won't build) This is really nuts I think. Anyone have a cookbook for making things sane? Will pkg_delete -a followed by adding back the packages I want have any hope of succeeding? --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All I want is KDE 3.2
That should be simple, however I'm getting close to looking at a full re-install :-( I'm running 4.8, I made sure I had cvsup'd the ports collection. I tried to download the 4-STABLE packages but trying to add them with pkg_add was giving me fits (some would, some claim that a previous version is installed but neither pkg_update nor pkg_delete can find the old version) I tried to rebuild KDE3.2 from ports, this fails in tk84 at the moment (tk84 won't build) This is really nuts I think. Anyone have a cookbook for making things sane? Will pkg_delete -a followed by adding back the packages I want have any hope of succeeding? --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All I want is KDE 3.2
At 05:02 PM 2/29/2004, Alex de Kruijff wrote: I have no qlue[sic] as what tk84 is. I experiance that kde_lib didn't build because kde_base was 3.2 or visa versa. pkg_delete -a did work here. tk84 is the Tk half of TCL/Tk for TCL ver 8.4. I used pkg_delete -a and re-installed from packages to get KDE 3.1 back again. I was able to build kdebase3.2 and kdelibs, it was the 'make install' from /usr/ports/x11/kde3/ that trys to rebuild Tk84. Even after manually installing the build tk84 from rabarber.fruitsalad.org it still wants to rebuild it. For anyone else who is interested the problem build at the moment is /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84 which is/was missing some includes (like tcl.h) from its work directory. I'm manually adding them by hand (yuck!) but so far don't have a clean build of tk84. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading KDE
At 09:49 PM 2/29/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gmake[1]:Leaving directory '/usr/ports/x11/kdelib3/work/kdelibs-3.2.0' gmake:*** [all] Erorr2 ***Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 I am runing FreeBSD 4.9 Well I got a bit farther than you did, got kdelibs-3.2.0 built but it fails later trying to build tk84. There is also a dependency on art1.2 even though the freebsd.kde.org page says that you should be able to use arts 1.1. After spending the entire weekend on it I've figured it may be easier just to wait for 4.10. --Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
