Re: apache mod_ssl chroot problem
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:29 -0600, James wrote: > > > Server beastie.mra.co.id:443 (RSA) > > Enter pass phrase:Apache:mod_ssl:Error: Private key not found. > > **Stopped > > > Isn't the private key the one on the local machine? If so, is the > private key visible with the chroot environment? > ___ the key is in /chroot/httpd/usr/local/apache2/conf/ with 400 mode owner by root and the path in htppd-ssl.conf is SSLCertificateKeyFile "/usr/local/apache2/conf/server.key" Is there anyway to test that my key is visible by chroot program ?? regards Reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
apache mod_ssl chroot problem
Dear List. I have problem running apache in chroot mode with ssl enable. Apache in chroot mode running fine without ssl enable, but when i try to start with mod_ssl enable, error occured with this message. beastie#chroot /chroot/httpd /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd Apache/2.2.6 mod_ssl/2.2.6 (Pass Phrase Dialog) Some of your private key files are encrypted for security reasons. In order to read them you have to provide the pass phrases. Server beastie.mra.co.id:443 (RSA) Enter pass phrase:Apache:mod_ssl:Error: Private key not found. **Stopped and with error log [Wed Oct 17 13:37:25 2007] [error] Init: Private key not found [Wed Oct 17 13:37:25 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218710120 error:0D094068:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_ASN1_SET:bad tag [Wed Oct 17 13:37:25 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218529960 error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_CHECK_TLEN:wrong tag [Wed Oct 17 13:37:25 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218595386 error:0D07803A:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_ITEM_EX_D2I:nested asn1 error [Wed Oct 17 13:37:25 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218734605 error:0D09A00D:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_PrivateKey:ASN1 lib [Wed Oct 17 13:38:32 2007] [error] Init: Private key not found [Wed Oct 17 13:38:32 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218710120 error:0D094068:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_ASN1_SET:bad tag [Wed Oct 17 13:38:32 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218529960 error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_CHECK_TLEN:wrong tag [Wed Oct 17 13:38:32 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218595386b error:0D07803A:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_ITEM_EX_D2I:nested asn1 error [Wed Oct 17 13:38:32 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 218734605 error:0D09A00D:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_PrivateKey:ASN1 lib If i escape from chrooted enviroment, apache with mod_ssl work fine beastie# /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd Apache/2.2.6 mod_ssl/2.2.6 (Pass Phrase Dialog) Some of your private key files are encrypted for security reasons. In order to read them you have to provide the pass phrases. Server www.example.com:443 (RSA) Enter pass phrase: OK: Pass Phrase Dialog successful. Is there something missing here, please enlight me. regards Reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
pf.conf + altq problem
Dear list.
My pf.conf not working.
I have pf in bridge machine with xl2 to internet firewall and xl1 to
internal switch. Bridging is ok.
This my simple pf.conf
me="172.16.0.228"
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue {me,dflt}
queue mebandwidth 8Kb
queue dflt bandwidth 16Kb cbq (default)
block log on {xl1,xl2} all
pass out log on xl1 from $me to any keep state
pass log on xl2 from $me to any keep state queue (me)
This rule is match when i try to connect to iperf server
# tcpdump -nett -i pflog0 | grep 172.16.0.228
tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
1160655756.150048 rule 3/(match) pass in on xl2: 172.16.0.228.44405 >
128.6.231.102.5001: [|tcp] (DF)
1160655756.150059 rule 2/(match) pass out on xl1: 172.16.0.228.44405 >
128.6.231.102.5001: [|tcp] (DF)
But iperf tell me that this connection is 24.4 Kbits/Sec. (more than
8Kbps)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] beastie]# iperf -c lss.rutgers.edu
Client connecting to lss.rutgers.edu, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
[ 3] local 172.16.0.228 port 44408 connected with 128.6.231.102 port
5001
[ 3] 0.0-16.1 sec 48.0 KBytes 24.4 Kbits/sec
I'm expecting that iperf report it equal with the bandwidth that i
assign to (me) queue pipe.
Is there any thing wrong or i missed something here ???
Please help me
regards
Reza
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT
At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote: I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can I bind the connections together without any other sort of router? I setup something similar that may be useful We have a small office with a 12/24ths of a T-1 line for an absurd amount of money as our primary connection. Cheap residential cable service became available with quadruple the bandwidth [incoming only] for cheap. I installed an extra NIC the to cable modem and setup the Squid proxy / cache on a f'bsd box that was already running other services. Then used some Squid options and IPFW to get all Squid's traffic running over the cable line. This gets us faster web and ftp downloads, and off-loads the T-1 for other things. -Wayne ___ I have similar network configuration (dual home ISP without routing protocol enabled), and looking for some solution with BSD robust TCP/IP stack. PF came with this solution; http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html but this solution is based on packet filtering anyway, not routing. You no need to specified your default gateway and you will have problem if you have Squid running on your gateway box or have NAT rule, that translate your host public address into private LAN host address, and (maybe) many more... Meanwhile, my gateway box is Linux-2.4.x with iproute2, and can accomplished this matter. But i really want to change this into *BSD, i heard that guys from OpenBSD work on this (http://www.openbsd.org/plus36.html, Permit multiple default route), but not worked in my test. .. what about FreeBSD ? regards .:NewBie:. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no /usr/compat/linux/proc
Muhammad Reza wrote: Kent Stewart wrote: On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:21 am, Muhammad Reza wrote: Kent Stewart wrote: On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List.. Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with linux_base package installed ? please give me clue.. When you do the install of the base, the port-message at the very end tells you to create it. You enter something like linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 in your /etc/fstab and then mount it. Kent regards reza I installed from packages (/stand/sysinstall), so i didnt see the port-message Have you added it to fstab? All you need to do then is say "mount linprocfs". You can find more with "man linprocfs". Kent beastie# cat /etc/fstab | grep linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfsrw 0 0 beastie# mount linprocfs mount: /usr/compat/linux/proc: No such file or directory and solve with create it manuallly... regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no /usr/compat/linux/proc
Kent Stewart wrote: On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:21 am, Muhammad Reza wrote: Kent Stewart wrote: On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List.. Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with linux_base package installed ? please give me clue.. When you do the install of the base, the port-message at the very end tells you to create it. You enter something like linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 in your /etc/fstab and then mount it. Kent regards reza I installed from packages (/stand/sysinstall), so i didnt see the port-message Have you added it to fstab? All you need to do then is say "mount linprocfs". You can find more with "man linprocfs". Kent beastie# cat /etc/fstab | grep linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfsrw 0 0 beastie# mount linprocfs mount: /usr/compat/linux/proc: No such file or directory regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no /usr/compat/linux/proc
Kent Stewart wrote: On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List.. Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with linux_base package installed ? please give me clue.. When you do the install of the base, the port-message at the very end tells you to create it. You enter something like linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 in your /etc/fstab and then mount it. Kent regards reza I installed from packages (/stand/sysinstall), so i didnt see the port-message regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no /usr/compat/linux/proc
Richard Verwayen wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 13:43 +0700 schrieb Muhammad Reza: Dear List.. Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with linux_base package installed ? please give me clue.. Issueing 'kldload linprocfs' may solve your problem... RIchard # kldload linprocfs kldload: can't load linprocfs: File exists i even build staticaly on my kernel with options LINPROCFS regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
no /usr/compat/linux/proc
Dear List.. Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with linux_base package installed ? please give me clue.. regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mod_chroot php and mysql connection
Dear list.. I try to configure mod_chroot-0.3 (apache-2.0) in my machine. But i cant connect to mysql database via my php connection. I'm already change bind address for mysql to loopback address (127.0.0.1) but still can't connect from my php connection. please give me a hint to solve this matter. regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd no LDAP
Muhammad Reza wrote: Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List I try to install /usr/port/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd and expect LDAP auth_mech is enable by default. but when i try to test with: beastie# /usr/local/sbin/saslauthd -v saslauthd 2.1.19 authentication mechanisms: sasldb getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap there is no LDAP auth_mech.. What should i do to enable it ? regard reza ___ I even upgrade my port, but it still not work @ my 5.3 STABLE but wok fine @ my 4.10 RELEASE. please help me regards reza ___ make clean && make install -DWITH_OPENLDAP solve it.. regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd no LDAP
Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List I try to install /usr/port/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd and expect LDAP auth_mech is enable by default. but when i try to test with: beastie# /usr/local/sbin/saslauthd -v saslauthd 2.1.19 authentication mechanisms: sasldb getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap there is no LDAP auth_mech.. What should i do to enable it ? regard reza ___ I even upgrade my port, but it still not work @ my 5.3 STABLE but wok fine @ my 4.10 RELEASE. please help me regards reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd no LDAP
Dear List I try to install /usr/port/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd and expect LDAP auth_mech is enable by default. but when i try to test with: beastie# /usr/local/sbin/saslauthd -v saslauthd 2.1.19 authentication mechanisms: sasldb getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap there is no LDAP auth_mech.. What should i do to enable it ? regard reza ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
V.35 Interface Card
Dear List. Please recommend us with V.35 interface adapter that work good in FreeBSD-4.10. regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
pf log
dear all, i have an error when try to read pf log via tcpdump on .5.3-stable ns2# /usr/sbin/tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0 tcpdump: BIOCSETIF: pflog0: Network is down ns2# /usr/sbin/tcpdump -n -e -ttt -r /var/log/pflog tcpdump: fread: Unknown error: 0 Whati should i do to fix this ? regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Multiple default gateway
Dear All, Is there any (future) release of FreeBSD concern about multiple default gateway ? Supposed i want to have load balancing and round robin connection in my FreeBSD firewall without routing daemon. regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000
Muhammad Reza wrote: Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 11 October 2004 at 5:55:24 +0700, Muhammad Reza wrote: Ok.. vinum then.. but i have error when applied this vinum.conf drive drive1 device /dev/da0s1e drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e volume usr setupstate plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive2 volume var setupstate plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive2 mail# vinum vinum -> create -f /etc/vinum.conf 2: drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e /*** 2 : Invalid argument*/ 1 drives: D drive1State: up Device /dev/da0s1e Avail: 0/16488 MB (0%) D drive2State: referenced Device /dev/da1s1e Avail: 0/0 MB 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 6780 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 9707 MB 4 plexes: P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 9707 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 0 B 4 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 9707 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 0 B which argumen is invalid ? i use 4.10 .. please help me... Take a look at the man page or http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Dear All, After read some paper and man page of vinum, i still have some difficulty. I have 2 disk identical disk that i want to mirrored 1:1 (RAID-1), first disk label is /#disklabel /da0 --snip-- 8 partitions: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 102400004.2BSD 2048 1638490 # (Cyl.0 - 63*) b: 1048576 1024000 swap# (Cyl. 63*- 129*) c: 358409520unused0 0 # (Cyl.0 - 2230*) e: 33768376 20725764.2BSD 2048 1638489 # (Cyl. 129*- 2230*/) /#cat /etc/fstab /dev/da0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1e /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc/proc procfs rw 0 0/ my question is ; how to prepare second disk layout (ad1) and rename it, so it can user RAID-1 and boot from the second one if ad0 fail ? Please help me. regards reza so i prepare second disk layout like this : /rootback with same size with / at 1st disk /swap with same size with swap at 1st disk /NOFUTURE remaining size now i have RAID-1 at my NetServer. regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 11 October 2004 at 5:55:24 +0700, Muhammad Reza wrote: Ok.. vinum then.. but i have error when applied this vinum.conf drive drive1 device /dev/da0s1e drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e volume usr setupstate plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive2 volume var setupstate plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive2 mail# vinum vinum -> create -f /etc/vinum.conf 2: drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e /*** 2 : Invalid argument*/ 1 drives: D drive1State: up Device /dev/da0s1e Avail: 0/16488 MB (0%) D drive2State: referenced Device /dev/da1s1e Avail: 0/0 MB 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 6780 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 9707 MB 4 plexes: P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 9707 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 0 B 4 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 9707 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 0 B which argumen is invalid ? i use 4.10 .. please help me... Take a look at the man page or http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Dear All, After read some paper and man page of vinum, i still have some difficulty. I have 2 disk identical disk that i want to mirrored 1:1 (RAID-1), first disk label is /#disklabel /da0 --snip-- 8 partitions: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 102400004.2BSD 2048 1638490 # (Cyl.0 - 63*) b: 1048576 1024000 swap# (Cyl. 63*- 129*) c: 358409520unused0 0 # (Cyl.0 - 2230*) e: 33768376 20725764.2BSD 2048 1638489 # (Cyl. 129*- 2230*/) /#cat /etc/fstab /dev/da0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1e /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc/proc procfs rw 0 0/ my question is ; how to prepare second disk layout (ad1) and rename it, so it can user RAID-1 and boot from the second one if ad0 fail ? Please help me. regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000
Ok.. vinum then.. but i have error when applied this vinum.conf drive drive1 device /dev/da0s1e drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e volume usr setupstate plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 13887091s drive drive2 volume var setupstate plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive drive2 mail# vinum vinum -> create -f /etc/vinum.conf 2: drive drive2 device /dev/da1s1e /*** 2 : Invalid argument*/ 1 drives: D drive1State: up Device /dev/da0s1e Avail: 0/16488 MB (0%) D drive2State: referenced Device /dev/da1s1e Avail: 0/0 MB 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 6780 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 9707 MB 4 plexes: P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 6780 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 9707 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 0 B 4 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 6780 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 9707 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 0 B which argumen is invalid ? i use 4.10 .. please help me... regards reza Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:47 schrieb Muhammad Reza: Dear All, Howto setup RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000 ? I have 2 Seagate HDD that want to be mirror 1:1, Can i do that from Symbios software or tool from my FreeBSD 4.10 ? With 4.10 you have the choice of vinum and ccd, in 5.3 you also have gmirror for RAID1. See the man pages for details, ccd is quiet easy, vinum is a bit more complex but more flexible too. -Harry regards reza ---snip--- sym0: <896> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfd00-0xfd001fff,0xfd002000-0xfd0023ff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci3 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-40, LVD, parity checking sym0: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym0: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym0: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. sym1: <896> port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xfd004000-0xfd005fff,0xfd002400-0xfd0027ff irq 5 at device 6.1 on pci3 sym1: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-40, LVD, parity checking sym1: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym1: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym1: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. ---snap--- .. .. --snip-- da0 at sym1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) da1 at sym1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) ---snap--- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED] " ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000
Dear All, Howto setup RAID 1 in HP NetServer LC 2000 ? I have 2 Seagate HDD that want to be mirror 1:1, Can i do that from Symbios software or tool from my FreeBSD 4.10 ? regards reza ---snip--- sym0: <896> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xfd00-0xfd001fff,0xfd002000-0xfd0023ff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci3 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-40, LVD, parity checking sym0: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym0: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym0: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. sym1: <896> port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xfd004000-0xfd005fff,0xfd002400-0xfd0027ff irq 5 at device 6.1 on pci3 sym1: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-40, LVD, parity checking sym1: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym1: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym1: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. ---snap--- . . --snip-- da0 at sym1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) da1 at sym1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) ---snap--- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
virtual-mailman
Dear List I Try to configure mailing list manager with mailman and postfix virtual domain, everything is install via port at 4.10RELEASE. But why cant i create virtual-mailman and aliases with newlist command or via web interface. yes i add POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = ["domain","domain2"] in mm.cfg.py. Please help me regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
virtual-mailman
Dear List I Try to configure mailing list manager with mailman and postfix virtual domain, everything is install via port at 4.10RELEASE. But why cant i create virtual-mailman and aliases with newlist command or via web interface. yes i add POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = ["domain","domain2"] in mm.cfg.py. Please help me regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD weakness.
BSD cant do multipath routing behind NAT, just like iproute(8) Linux, hope Paul Hening Kamp Patch will work... regards reza Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix. Under these conditions, I guess that I need to go for Linux... Seriously, one thing that catches my attention is that I don't see any really great differences between the BSD (Any version) and the Linux community. In doing some reading, it appears that the people at KDE and Gnome, as well as many others, have this same thought. I was actually pointed in the FreeBSD direction by a magazine writer whom I was communicating with about the future of Linux. We talked by email and he thought that FreeBSD had to most promise of a good future. He suggested that I should check FreeBSD out. Understand that learning UNIX is not my end goal. It may happen in the process, but being a master of the UNIX system is not my end goal. Nor is writing programs my goal. I wrote a ton of programs 20 years ago, but I haven't written a single line of code in 10 years. I have no wish to work in an IT shop anywhere. My goal is simply to keep some of my older computers useful. I care less about which operating system I am using as long as it does the job that I want. This business of buying new computers every year or two is a Micro$oft idea. It is also an idea that needs to be re-thought. Micro$oft is great about jumping onto new technology with half-baked software. When they get close to fixing their software, then they abandon it for new technology and more half-baked software expecting people to buy the new hardware/software. It's a system that Micro$oft can't be beaten at. I simply think that it is time for a change. (I'm not against new ideas. But I hate keeping up with Mr. Gates.) Lloyd Hayes Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://TalkingStaff.bravehost.com E-FAX Number: (208) 248-6590 Web Journal: http://lloyd_hayes.bravejournal.com/ Tom McLaughlin wrote: On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 15:40, Jorn Argelo wrote: Lloyd Hayes wrote: I finally decided that I needed to get more information on FreeBSD. I got it up and running, then I did something else and I start getting errors again So I just ordered 3 books on FreeBSD from Amazon. In most of the reviews posted there about the books, people were complaining about weak documentation, too much information about things that they were not interested in, and errors in the in the books which seems to be the most common complaint. In my very short recent history with FreeBSD, I've formed the opinion that documenting FreeBSD is it's greatest weakness. FreeBSD needs someone who can actually type to write a good book for beginners who have never seen UNIX code. A book is needed with examples that actually WORK! Examples that are explained in plain English. There seems to be very few books on FreeBSD around. Beginners who never seen UNIX coude shouldn't start with FreeBSD in the first place, if you ask me. They should start Mandrake Linux or SuSe or something of the sorts. FreeBSD isn't made to make an "user friendly" operating system, as Mandrake Linux is aiming at. You just have to know some Unix stuff before you even start with FreeBSD. I would have to disgree having my first *nix experience five years ago with Mandrake and switching to FreeBSD a number of months ago. I switched to FreeBSD because I felt my unix skills were getting rusty. When I started with Mandrake I did most of my system configuration and administration from the command line and I learned a lot of unix in those first few years. Over time with the inclusion of more GUI based tools that became harder. Files seemed to keep moving or configuration was spread across too many files. I believe you end up becomming too dependant on the distribution specific configuration tools with Linux and you don't truely learn the system. For anyone who really wants to learn unix the BSDs are the place to start. Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix. Tom I have the book on the below link, and I must say it is very very good. Good examples and clearly elaborated, though it lacks in-depth information, which might be handy for more advanced users. It's good for beginners who are comfortable in a Unix or Linux enviroment. Why don't you give that one a shot? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0072224096/104-0798845-8369533?v=glance And what about our own FreeBSD Handbook? Don't tell me that that is bad, because there is book that can beat it if you ask me. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ Cheers, Jorn ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions T
vpn over ipsec question
Dear List. I try to configure vpn over ipsec between two FreeBSD (4.10PRERELEASE and 5.1.p17) gateways. My guidelines is from FreeBSD handbook, Tunelling is workfine with gifconfig command, i can ping each internal interface from both side gateway. The problem is when i try to securing the link with setkey command (setkey -f /etc/ipsec.conf), i cant no longer established connection between internal interface. (ping time out). Please help me regarding this problem regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
named in sandbox
dear All, I running named in sandbox as a secondary name server with FreeBSD-5.1.p17, Named log always complain: named-xfer exited with signal 6 and slave zone expired for every zone transfer. but, when it's running on default mode (no chroot sandbox) or as a primary server (with chroot sandbox). named work fine. please help me , how to make secondary zone transfer running in sandbox regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Multiple Contection to internet
Dear BSD'ers Can freebsd routing kernel handle multiple provider (multipath gateway) ? without BGP ? Now I have a (new ) ADSL, and T1 connection to different provider, my LAN is nat-ing behind freebsd router, I want some people in my network to connect to internet via ADSL and some people via T1, based on their IP. They said , i can do that with linux iproute tools, but i dont want to replace my FreeBSD-4.9Stable router with Linux. Please help me, any suggestion is appriciate. regards reza ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
