Re: root is full
Thanks all for the abundance of replys. Looks like you all had the same idea. Before I got your emails I found out the problem. I had another partition for backups mounted on the root level. I had forgot to add an entry to /etc/fstab. Things were running fine for weeks, however, there was a crash and when it came back online the /backup existed on the root. Thanks! On Feb 18, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Feb 18, 2004, at 9:00 PM, Will Prater wrote: My root partition is full, but I cannot figure out how it got filled so fast the last security check claimed there to be 5% of capacity and now its at 108%. Where else can I check to see what is filling the root partition? Try cd / du -sk * Dw --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
root is full
List, My root partition is full, but I cannot figure out how it got filled so fast the last security check claimed there to be 5% of capacity and now its at 108%. Where else can I check to see what is filling the root partition? Thanks in advance --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: help with system loging
On Jan 28, 2004, at 5:01 AM, Roman Neuhauser wrote: # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-28 02:59:50 -0800: Currently saslauthd is logging in two places, however, I cannot figure out how to turn off its logging or have it log just to auth.log rather than messages and auth.log. here is what I have for /var/log/messages *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/messages I guess it's the "auth" facility messages you get logged in /var/log/messages. If this is true, add auth.none into the line somewhere after the "*.notice" That seemed to do the trick. Thanks!! -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
help with system loging
List, Currently saslauthd is logging in two places, however, I cannot figure out how to turn off its logging or have it log just to auth.log rather than messages and auth.log. here is what I have for /var/log/messages *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/messages what should be removed to not allow saslauthd log there. here is what I have for auth.log auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log Any ideas appreciated. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd crashing server
On Jan 8, 2004, at 12:38 AM, Will Prater wrote: Subhro, On Jan 6, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Subhro wrote: Hi Will, READ the Handbook :-). After you cvsup for some special installation instructions <<<<===Start building the world i.e. the new binaries <<< Here is the custom kernel stuff <<<= Here goes the kernel building <<<===Installed the kernel here <<<mind it its single user. The box boots here on the new kernel <<<<===Here goes your new system <<<===this time a normal boot Yes, I have run over the handbook, I was just a bit worried about the crashing server. Thanks for the run down. I do not have physical access to the server. Can one make installworld running in multiuser mode, if one had shut down any active daemons and locked out the users? I could re-install sshd into /usr/local so when I make installworld /usr/sbin/sshd will not be overwritten. Can this be done without booting into single user? Thanks! Thanks for any advice. If your system gives you a login prompt then the steps to follow are :-) hurray! And yes u can cvsuo to current as well as stable tree. If you want to go to stable, then use /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile. Do read through that file before you run it. Great. --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd crashing server
Subhro, On Jan 6, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Subhro wrote: Hi Will, READ the Handbook :-). After you cvsup for some special installation instructions ===Start building the world i.e. the new binaries <<< Here is the custom kernel stuff <<<= Here goes the kernel building <<<===Installed the kernel here <<
Re: sshd crashing server
Subhro, On Jan 3, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Subhro wrote: Hey Will, Do you remember if you added anything nonstandard to CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf? I dont thin I have added anything to /etc/make.conf. I can confirm once the system is up again. SSHD did not start up at boot after the crash so I am trying to have someone in the colo start it manually, hoping that will get me in!! Something like -funroll-loops or some non standard optimizations? Also what is the securelevel you are running the system at? I am not sure, probably 0. Did u specifically mention to OVERWRITE the base system and did u add the line sshd_script="/usr/local/sbin/sshd" in /etc/rc.conf? Yes, those are done. That is why I wonder why no sshd started at bootup. I sure hope the team over at the colo can get sshd running. IF u did all of these then I would recommend add NO_OPENSSH="YES" to /etc/make.conf and rebuild the world. Also go through a CVSup before the rebuild. Also if possible paste the last 25 lines of /var/log/messages. As far as I can make out without the logs, somehow the sshd code has got to become incompatible with the rest of the source tree. OK. Let me get the machine up and I would gladly send you some of the messages. Thanks again!! Cheers! Subhro -Original Message----- From: Will Prater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 11:00 AM To: Subhro Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sshd crashing server Subhro, I have done this and tried another command that would spew some data and the machine crashed again. Any more ideas why the sshd process would be choking and crashing the server? I cant send you an example as I am locked out. Looks like sshd is not starting after the new port install described below. Regards Will On Jan 3, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Subhro wrote: Hey Will, The original SSH shipped with the base system is actually a scaled down version. Check out /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. Compile the above port with option -DOPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE and also include -DWITHOUT_KERBEROS if you do not need the Kerberos Authentication. This will overwrite the base SSH system with an OpenSSH version specifically ported to FreeBSD. Also I would like to know the contents of CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf. Make a note that after every "make world" you would have to clean and reinstall the port with make install -DOPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE -DWITHOUT_KERBEROS Cheers! Subhro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Prater Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sshd crashing server On Jan 2, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Will Prater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: List, sshd seems to be crashing my server. I am looking for any help regarding why this could be happening. I am running sshd version OpenSSH_3.6.1. Here is the output from dmesg: the machine crashed every time when running #ipfw show or #dmesg -a for example and will crash when part way through the listing. Any ideas?? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc023c52a stack pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6bbc frame pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6be4 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 394 (sshd) interrupt mask = net tty trap number = 12 panic: page fault 1) What version of FreeBSD? 4.9 RELEASE 2) How did you install that version of OpenSSH? I have tried the one from the ports and the pre-installed version. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd crashing server
Subhro, I have done this and tried another command that would spew some data and the machine crashed again. Any more ideas why the sshd process would be choking and crashing the server? I cant send you an example as I am locked out. Looks like sshd is not starting after the new port install described below. Regards Will On Jan 3, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Subhro wrote: Hey Will, The original SSH shipped with the base system is actually a scaled down version. Check out /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. Compile the above port with option -DOPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE and also include -DWITHOUT_KERBEROS if you do not need the Kerberos Authentication. This will overwrite the base SSH system with an OpenSSH version specifically ported to FreeBSD. Also I would like to know the contents of CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf. Make a note that after every "make world" you would have to clean and reinstall the port with make install -DOPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE -DWITHOUT_KERBEROS Cheers! Subhro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Prater Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sshd crashing server On Jan 2, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Will Prater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: List, sshd seems to be crashing my server. I am looking for any help regarding why this could be happening. I am running sshd version OpenSSH_3.6.1. Here is the output from dmesg: the machine crashed every time when running #ipfw show or #dmesg -a for example and will crash when part way through the listing. Any ideas?? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc023c52a stack pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6bbc frame pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6be4 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 394 (sshd) interrupt mask = net tty trap number = 12 panic: page fault 1) What version of FreeBSD? 4.9 RELEASE 2) How did you install that version of OpenSSH? I have tried the one from the ports and the pre-installed version. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd crashing server
On Jan 2, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Will Prater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: List, sshd seems to be crashing my server. I am looking for any help regarding why this could be happening. I am running sshd version OpenSSH_3.6.1. Here is the output from dmesg: the machine crashed every time when running #ipfw show or #dmesg -a for example and will crash when part way through the listing. Any ideas?? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc023c52a stack pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6bbc frame pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6be4 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 394 (sshd) interrupt mask = net tty trap number = 12 panic: page fault 1) What version of FreeBSD? 4.9 RELEASE 2) How did you install that version of OpenSSH? I have tried the one from the ports and the pre-installed version. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sshd crashing server
List, sshd seems to be crashing my server. I am looking for any help regarding why this could be happening. I am running sshd version OpenSSH_3.6.1. Here is the output from dmesg: the machine crashed every time when running #ipfw show or #dmesg -a for example and will crash when part way through the listing. Any ideas?? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc023c52a stack pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6bbc frame pointer = 0x10:0xd9ff6be4 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 394 (sshd) interrupt mask = net tty trap number = 12 panic: page fault --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
On Dec 31, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Micheal Patterson wrote: - Original Message - From: "Will Prater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 1:27 PM Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9 On Dec 31, 2003, at 5:12 AM, fbsd_user wrote: The post you are replying to tells you pf has been ported to FBSD. Yes, and my question was how to get a port to 4.9. I am aware of the port being available for 5.0, 5.1. I would like to know if anyone has gotten it to run on 4.9 and what patches were necessary. Thanks Are you talking about PF or IPF in 4.9? If it's IPF, it's a kernel option. PF. I already have IPF working. I am more familiar with PF and would rather be using it. Thanks Check out LINT and you'll find: options IPFILTER#ipfilter support options IPFILTER_LOG#ipfilter logging options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default Also, you should be able to do a man ipf on 4.9. -- Micheal Patterson TSG Network Administration 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
On Dec 31, 2003, at 5:12 AM, fbsd_user wrote: The post you are replying to tells you pf has been ported to FBSD. Yes, and my question was how to get a port to 4.9. I am aware of the port being available for 5.0, 5.1. I would like to know if anyone has gotten it to run on 4.9 and what patches were necessary. Thanks All you had to do is go look for it in the port collection your self, here is the direct link. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=pf&stype=all&release=5.1- CURRENT%2Fi386 pf_freebsd-2.00_1 OpenBSD pf as a kldmodule Maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also listed in: ipv6 Description : Sources : Package : Changes : Download http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will Prater Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 2:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9 List, Anyone know if there is a way to get PF to port to FreeBSD 4.9? Thanks On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:26 PM, fbsd_user wrote: PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a common code background, but I do know pf & ipf have totally different rule processing logic though the rules do look some what common. When it comes to using variables on the rule set, that is just the normal function of shell processing. Ipfw, ipf, and pf can all be buried inside of an shell script and perform variable substitution. In FBSD the rc.conf statement for pointing to the directory location of the ipf rules can not process a script. You just point that rc.conf statement to an empty file just to get the system up. Then you have script in the startup application directory that executes to load the ipf rules. Works great. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ipf / pf Hi, Here's a question that might seem trivial: What's the relationship between the freebsd ipf and the openbsd pf? Are they the same thing, or are they separately developed branches of a common codebase? Or maybe they are totally different. I ask this because I was looking around for guides for ipf.rules, and some of the openbsd pf examples look similar, but some command syntax are different. The openbsd pf.conf example had the ability to define variables of ip addresses, interface names, etc, but it doesn't seem to work with ipf.rules. Is there any way to define variables in ipf.rules? please cc me in your responses cause I'm not subscribed to the list thanks so much jonathan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
List, Anyone know if there is a way to get PF to port to FreeBSD 4.9? Thanks On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:26 PM, fbsd_user wrote: PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a common code background, but I do know pf & ipf have totally different rule processing logic though the rules do look some what common. When it comes to using variables on the rule set, that is just the normal function of shell processing. Ipfw, ipf, and pf can all be buried inside of an shell script and perform variable substitution. In FBSD the rc.conf statement for pointing to the directory location of the ipf rules can not process a script. You just point that rc.conf statement to an empty file just to get the system up. Then you have script in the startup application directory that executes to load the ipf rules. Works great. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ipf / pf Hi, Here's a question that might seem trivial: What's the relationship between the freebsd ipf and the openbsd pf? Are they the same thing, or are they separately developed branches of a common codebase? Or maybe they are totally different. I ask this because I was looking around for guides for ipf.rules, and some of the openbsd pf examples look similar, but some command syntax are different. The openbsd pf.conf example had the ability to define variables of ip addresses, interface names, etc, but it doesn't seem to work with ipf.rules. Is there any way to define variables in ipf.rules? please cc me in your responses cause I'm not subscribed to the list thanks so much jonathan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mysql and slow_query_log
List, I have log-slow-queries on and set my slow query time to 5. Weird thing is, all the queries are being logged hostname-slow.log. Even the ones at 0 seconds. Here is an example. What am I missing here? select alias from virtual where username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and status = '1' limit 1; # [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail[mail] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 0 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 24 select alias from virtual where username = '@lists.horde.org' and status = '1' limit 1; --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mysql and slow_query_log
List, I also have 'log-long-format' enabled, but this should have no affect. Thanks for any ideas. --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ispman
List, I have been searching the net and seen a mix of answers. Can one run ISPMAN on FreeBSD 4.9? What features can and can we not use. I see that pam_ldap in ports is not up to 1.8 or later. Also nss_ldap does not seem to be compatible (unless FreeBSD 5.1) according to the developers site. Any other ISP virtual host solutions out there that people are using? I have a set of command line perl hacks that I have been using. These work fine. I just want some standardization and billing control would be really nice. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: web log and bandwidth usage
The current port appears to be broken. In the immortal words of Will Prater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... I am looking for a solution that will monitor bandwidth usage for websites on a server. I would like to get notified if a certain site has exceeded a certain limit. I could create such a script myself by parsing the weblogs.. or parsing output from a web log analyzer such as analog, but I would like to see if there are any solutions that some of you may be employing before I spend development time on this. check out mod_accounting, it's designed specifically for what you want. What might be some of the better choices for web log analysis as well? I use webalizer but mostly I get what I need from mod_accounting (look in ports under www) -- Tim Aslat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au P: +61 8 82243020M: +61 0401088479 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: postfix restrictions error
try inserting a comma after this line reject_invalid_hostname On Nov 25, 2003, at 7:59 PM, dave wrote: Hello, I'm trying to implement the below restrictions on my postfix 2.0.16 system. I am getting the error: "Missing '=' after attribute 'permit_mynetworks'" on a line number I copied these verbatum from a site, i do not understand what is up. Thanks for any help, it's probably just the late hour. Thanks a lot. Dave. # uce values strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes smtpd_etrn_restrictions = permit_mynetworks smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_pipelining, reject_invalid_hostname reject_maps_rbl maps_rbl_domains = sbl.spamhaus.org, relays.ordb.org, opm.blitzed.org, dun.dnsrbl.net, spam.dnsrbl.net smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unknown_sender_domain smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, reject_non_fqdn_recipient ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
web log and bandwidth usage
List, I am looking for a solution that will monitor bandwidth usage for websites on a server. I would like to get notified if a certain site has exceeded a certain limit. I could create such a script myself by parsing the weblogs.. or parsing output from a web log analyzer such as analog, but I would like to see if there are any solutions that some of you may be employing before I spend development time on this. What might be some of the better choices for web log analysis as well? I use to use analog. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: daemon monitoring
On Nov 25, 2003, at 12:26 PM, Chris Pressey wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:51:20 -0800 Will Prater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also does one only need to create a log directory if the application itself does not log? Or is this to log other information, I cant seem to find an answer to this on DJB site. Thanks --will I'm pretty sure that if the application manages log files for itself, you don't need a log subdir. That's only useful for when you want to log (or otherwise intercept) the application's stdout/stderr/etc output. This makes sense. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: daemon monitoring
On Nov 24, 2003, at 2:59 PM, Jesse Guardiani wrote: I'm particularly fond of daemontools/supervise, actually. You've got to jump through some hoops to get it working (process must run in foreground, process must start first time, etc..), but it's very reliable and the qmail style qmailctl script can be adapted to any configuration with minimal work to make an excellent control script. Yes, it looks promising. I have it working for a few of my processes. I was looking to something similar to Mac OS X Servers watchdog. This is much better. I get weird errors when I am trying to get saslauthd since I have to use fghack to get it going. Can you send me the qmailctl script or some examples that you have with some daemons on your system? Do you have weirdness when working with daemons that run themselves in the backgroud? One has to use fghack to place them in the foreground and then there is no control to stop the service through daemontools. For example saslatuhd.. Also does one only need to create a log directory if the application itself does not log? Or is this to log other information, I cant seem to find an answer to this on DJB site. Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: daemon monitoring
List, On Nov 24, 2003, at 3:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +-le 23/11/2003 16:46 -0800, Will Prater écrivait : | Sorry, I mispoke. I will be using Nagios to monitor, but I need to make | sure they will restart if there is an error. Will nagios do this as well? Nagios can make use of net/nrpe, which can restart services. This is interesting. This would be all one needs to keep this up and online. I dont see a real need for daemontools/supervise if one can use nagios to monitor, report, and keep services online. Is anyone using Nagios in this manor? Thanks --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: daemon monitoring
On Nov 24, 2003, at 1:10 PM, Jesse Guardiani wrote: Will Prater wrote: List, What are most of you using to monitor the running daemons? I have been loooking into DJB daemontools which seems appropriate, but are there any others that you reccomend? If DJB's daemontools is the one, could I get some more examples? I am primarily trying to keep my mail system online: postfix, cyrus, saslauthd, mysql, and spamassassin. I'm particularly fond of daemontools/supervise, actually. You've got to jump through some hoops to get it working (process must run in foreground, process must start first time, etc..), but it's very reliable and the qmail style qmailctl script can be adapted to any configuration with minimal work to make an excellent control script. Yes, it looks promising. I have it working for a few of my processes. I was looking to something similar to Mac OS X Servers watchdog. This is much better. I get weird errors when I am trying to get saslauthd since I have to use fghack to get it going. Can you send me the qmailctl script or some examples that you have with some daemons on your system? Thanks -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: daemon monitoring
Sorry, I mispoke. I will be using Nagios to monitor, but I need to make sure they will restart if there is an error. Will nagios do this as well? Thanks On Nov 23, 2003, at 1:57 PM, Alex de Kruijff wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 10:52:48AM -0800, Will Prater wrote: List, What are most of you using to monitor the running daemons? I have been loooking into DJB daemontools which seems appropriate, but are there any others that you reccomend? If DJB's daemontools is the one, could I get some more examples? I am primarily trying to keep my mail system online: postfix, cyrus, saslauthd, mysql, and spamassassin. I would advise Nagios. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
daemon monitoring
List, What are most of you using to monitor the running daemons? I have been loooking into DJB daemontools which seems appropriate, but are there any others that you reccomend? If DJB's daemontools is the one, could I get some more examples? I am primarily trying to keep my mail system online: postfix, cyrus, saslauthd, mysql, and spamassassin. Thanks for any input --will ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"