Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-06 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:00:11 +0300 (EEST), Ivan Ivanov wrote:
 Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9)
 is it posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161
 217 whit this specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and
 5gb HDD

It is very well possible, but you need to pay attention to
a few things:

1. You won't be able to build things from source on that
machine. Consider using packages for installation, or a
second system to build and export (via NFS) the data required.

2. You will have to choose wisely what you install. You
can install the OS plus X, and then be very selective
regarding the applications. Firefox for example may be
a bit heavy as a web browser, but there are alternatives,
such as dillo or lynx (in graphics mode). Also choose your
work and multimedia applications wisely. There _are_ still
programs in the ports collection that are very low on bloat,
but you need to do some research to find them.

3. For using your applications within the GUI, choose a
good window manager, e. g. FVWM or XFCE 3 (not 4!), or
IceWM or Blackbox or olvwm or something comparable. You
need to try which one fits your needs. Maybe a tiling
window manager would be even better -- but I can't recommend
one, because their magic didn't open up to my ignorant
mind yet. :-)

4. Refering to no. 1, you should also aim to build a custom
kernel on another machine that exactly fits the hardware that
you have present in the Thinkpad. Streamline your kernel.
Make it reflect the present hardware configuration. Maybe
there are even some options and tunables to make it run
better than the GENERIC kernel.

The main limiting factor I see is the 64 MB RAM. If you have
the chance, try to upgrade it. I know that's not easily
possible.

Note: I've been using FreeBSD 4 and 5 on a 150 MHz Pentium (1)
with 64 MB (later on: 128 MB) RAM and 8 GB disk. This machine
could compile the world (even though it needed 24 h to do that),
fetch an ISO via FTP, play MP3 music via xmms, and still offer
a well responding web browsing experience using Opera. NO JOKE.
Mister Coffee was my first FreeBSD workstation. :-)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-06 Thread Wojciech Puchar

1. You won't be able to build things from source on that
machine. Consider using packages for installation, or a
second system to build and export (via NFS) the data required.


You can but... too slow


3. For using your applications within the GUI, choose a
good window manager, e. g. FVWM or XFCE 3 (not 4!), or
IceWM or Blackbox or olvwm or something comparable. You
need to try which one fits your needs. Maybe a tiling
window manager would be even better -- but I can't recommend
one, because their magic didn't open up to my ignorant
mind yet. :-)


Actually everything should work fine with window managers you mentioned. 
The real problems are modern programs like firefox.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:00:11 +0300 (EEST), Ivan Ivanov wrote:
 Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9)
 is it posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161
 217 whit this specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and
 5gb HDD

Polytropon free...@edvax.de responded:

 It is very well possible, but you need to pay attention to
 a few things:

 1. You won't be able to build things from source on that
 machine. Consider using packages for installation, or a
 second system to build and export (via NFS) the data required.

 2. You will have to choose wisely what you install. You
 can install the OS plus X, and then be very selective
 regarding the applications. Firefox for example may be
 a bit heavy as a web browser, but there are alternatives,
 such as dillo or lynx (in graphics mode). Also choose your
 work and multimedia applications wisely. There _are_ still
 programs in the ports collection that are very low on bloat,
 but you need to do some research to find them.

 3. For using your applications within the GUI, choose a
 good window manager, e. g. FVWM or XFCE 3 (not 4!), or
 IceWM or Blackbox or olvwm or something comparable. You
 need to try which one fits your needs. Maybe a tiling
 window manager would be even better -- but I can't recommend
 one, because their magic didn't open up to my ignorant
 mind yet. :-)

 4. Refering to no. 1, you should also aim to build a custom
 kernel on another machine that exactly fits the hardware that
 you have present in the Thinkpad. Streamline your kernel.
 Make it reflect the present hardware configuration. Maybe
 there are even some options and tunables to make it run
 better than the GENERIC kernel.

 The main limiting factor I see is the 64 MB RAM. If you have
 the chance, try to upgrade it. I know that's not easily
 possible.

 Note: I've been using FreeBSD 4 and 5 on a 150 MHz Pentium (1)
 with 64 MB (later on: 128 MB) RAM and 8 GB disk. This machine
 could compile the world (even though it needed 24 h to do that),
 fetch an ISO via FTP, play MP3 music via xmms, and still offer
 a well responding web browsing experience using Opera. NO JOKE.
 Mister Coffee was my first FreeBSD workstation. :-)

On part 1, it might be possible to build things on the old machine, but only 
little things.

Ports tree and source tree would really pinch the hard disk space (5 GB).

Would you actually boot the IBM Thinkpad by network, keep source and ports 
trees on a newer computer's hard drive, do the building on the newer computer, 
and install by NFS?  I've thought of doing that, have no intention to upgrade 
FreeBSD 8.2 to 9.0 on old computer, where FreeBSD slice is 12 GB and I'd have 
to rebuild all ports , and in all likelihood bog down.

On part 2, do you mean lynx or links?  

Lynx is text-mode but can show images on a separate screen: I did that with 
DR-DOS 7.03 long ago and more recently FreeDOS.

Links can be built with graphics, there is even a DOS port, but a far cry from 
Firefox (try Midori?) which have no DOS ports.

I think there is also w3m?

Building the kernel is nowhere near as time-consuming as buildworld.

On my older computer, building a custom kernel took about 25 minutes for 
NetBSD, 75 minutes for FreeBSD 8.2, and 130 minutes for Gentoo Linux, and the 
Gentoo Linux kernel proved nonbootable.

On the last part, time required to download an ISO would depend on type of 
connection more than CPU speed.


Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-06 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 04:05:36 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
 On part 1, it might be possible to build things on the old
 machine, but only little things.

It _will_ work, it just will take some time. If that isn't
a major concern -- no problem. If the machine is low on RAM,
there should at least be sufficient swap space.



 Ports tree and source tree would really pinch the hard disk
 space (5 GB).

Using them via NFS (when needed) or as read-only source from
a CD could be possible. However, I'd suggest using the NFS
approach during installation time. On the described hardware,
the usage paradigm should be: INSTALL ONCE, THEN KEEP USING.
If updates are required, using an external compiler would
be the best choice. In case you're only using precompiled
packages (installs via pkg_add -r), you don't need the ports
tree at all. For dealing with the system (from /usr/src), if
it has to be present on disk, /usr/obj could be used via NFS
on some scratch disk. There are many possibilities to get the
job done. They all require some time, but it _is_ possible.



 On part 2, do you mean lynx or links?  

I think it was links that also had a GUI port. There may
be other lightweight browsers (like dillo) that one could
consider using. Of course none of them will utilize Flash. :-)



 Links can be built with graphics, there is even a DOS port,
 but a far cry from Firefox (try Midori?) which have no DOS ports.



 I think there is also w3m?

I know w3m is a very nice text mode browser, I can't say if
it has graphics support.



 Building the kernel is nowhere near as time-consuming as buildworld.

True, but if you update kernel and world, both have to be processes.
Otherwise, you could stay on the installed version level (e. g. 9.0)
and only tweak GENERIC into something that is more efficient. But
in that case, sources should not be altered.



 On my older computer, building a custom kernel took about 25 minutes
 for NetBSD, 75 minutes for FreeBSD 8.2, and 130 minutes for Gentoo
 Linux, and the Gentoo Linux kernel proved nonbootable.

That's normal. :-)



 On the last part, time required to download an ISO would depend on
 type of connection more than CPU speed.

Sure, no big CPU load. I just wanted to illustrate that this old
system could do things that some modern PCs fail to do: Just
imagine users complaining about skipping audio when they move
windows across the screen... :-)

And I still have the machine I described. Mister Coffee is
currently installed with FreeBSD 8.2, expecting to be used for
experimental projects as an internal file / IRC / maybe OA server.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


re. Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-06 Thread herbert langhans
 Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it 
 posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this 
 specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD

I've been using even slower Thinkpads (300MHz), there are a few things
to be aware of.

Check on http://www.thinkwiki.org if the ethernet connection is
supported, also the graphic card (if you need a Windowmanager).
Soundcard can be an issue too.

Try to get some more RAM for it. On internet auctions you find them for
a few bucks, check on the thinkwiki if the type fits in. From 256MB on
it works well, good is 512. The slow processor doesnt matter much if you
have enough RAM.

Since the harddisk is not very large, you may want to take a look to
NetBSD (sorry FreeBSD-gurus). NetBSD is targeted at minimal or exotic
computers, you can easily install the precompiled packages without a
portstree. I use it for all my Thinkpads (Thinkpad 600, T23 and X31). 

Cheers
herb langhans

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-05 Thread Ivan Ivanov
Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it posible 
to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this specs 500 mhz 
Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD
BR/BR/-BR/
a 
href=http://a.abv.bg/www/delivery/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=130828__zoneid=63__oadest=http://www.sdi.bg/onlineInsurance/?utm_source=gbgutm_medium=txtLinkutm_content=home;
 target=_blankГражданска отговорност – Цените на компаниите/a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-05 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Ivan Ivanov hel...@abv.bg:

 Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it 
 posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this 
 specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD

I think it would be possible, but there would not be enough RAM or disk space 
to rebuild the system (make buildworld) or build the bigger applications from 
the ports collection.  You might not have enough RAM to run (Mozilla) Firefox. 

There are some things you could do not involving the fancy stuff: server, maybe?

You could try to find something for older computers on distrowatch.com, such as 
Puppy Linux.

Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi,
Reference:
 From: Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com 
 Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:09:17 -0400 
 Message-id:   53.21.06836.dac26...@smtp02.insight.synacor.com 

Thomas Mueller wrote:
 from Ivan Ivanov hel...@abv.bg:
 
  Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it 
  posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this 
  specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD
 
 I think it would be possible, but there would not be enough RAM or disk space 
 to rebuild the system (make buildworld) or build the bigger applications from 
 the ports collection.  You might not have enough RAM to run (Mozilla) 
 Firefox. 
 
 There are some things you could do not involving the fancy stuff: server, 
 maybe?
 
 You could try to find something for older computers on distrowatch.com, such 
 as Puppy Linux.


Sorry, duff advice, don't need to send enquirer off to Linux IMO ;-)

I guess Linux probably can't shrink smaller than BSD,
(though that could be an endless thread, custom kernels  
striping binaries,  older gcc being a Lot smaller etc)

but Firefox  Gcc will be approx same size on both if same version.

maybe the enquirer doesnt need firefox anyway,
eg the router passing this mail runs 6.4, with 40M ram
doesn't need firefox, does run proxy http  sendmail etc.

Dont forget why Swap was invented. One doesnt Have to have tons of ram.
Things might or not thrash depending on load etc.

However ... 64M with X GUI sounds a stretch, 
but then equally for modern BSD  Linux,

Easier with older smaller versions of OS.
(gcc thrashes building itself now on low memory machines)

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script,  indent with  .
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix.  http://berklix.org/yahoo/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Hi i want to ask a question

2012-07-05 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Ivan Ivanov hel...@abv.bg:

 Hi i want to ask a question about the new release of FreeBSD (9) is it 
 posible to run this release /whit GUI/ in IBM Thinkpad 1161 217 whit this 
 specs 500 mhz Intel Celeron processor 64mb Ram and 5gb HDD

I think it would be possible, but there would not be enough RAM or disk space 
to rebuild the system (make buildworld) or build the bigger applications from 
the ports collection.  You might not have enough RAM to run (Mozilla) Firefox. 

There are some things you could do not involving the fancy stuff: server, maybe?

You could try to find something for older computers on distrowatch.com, such as 
Puppy Linux.

Julian Stacey responded:

 Sorry, duff advice, don't need to send enquirer off to Linux IMO ;-)

 I guess Linux probably can't shrink smaller than BSD,
 (though that could be an endless thread, custom kernels  
 striping binaries,  older gcc being a Lot smaller etc)

 but Firefox  Gcc will be approx same size on both if same version.

 maybe the enquirer doesnt need firefox anyway,
 eg the router passing this mail runs 6.4, with 40M ram
 doesn't need firefox, does run proxy http  sendmail etc.

 Dont forget why Swap was invented. One doesnt Have to have tons of ram.
 Things might or not thrash depending on load etc.

 However ... 64M with X GUI sounds a stretch, 
 but then equally for modern BSD  Linux,

 Easier with older smaller versions of OS.
 (gcc thrashes building itself now on low memory machines)

Building big ports, including gcc, really can bog down on an old 
under-resourced computer, even with 256 MB RAM and 12 GB FreeBSD slice.

I speak from experience with both Linux and FreeBSD, through 8.2 on old 
computer.  NetBSD too (5.1_STABLE).

On this old computer, GNOME 3 live CDs and USB failed to boot and get to GUI: 
didn't work at all.

When I first responded on this thread, I didn't think of FreeDOS 
(www.freedos.org), but then you can't run anything close to Firefox on FreeDOS 
or any other DOS.  But FreeDOS would run with a 5 GB hard drive all in one 
FAT32 partition.

Work has been and is being done on FreeBSD to make it feasible to install 
application software via binary patches, that would come in useful on 
low-resource computers.  With 64 MB RAM, I'd look to a window manager like 
IceWM, or maybe JWM or Ratpoison, but certainly not KDE.

An old computer with insufficient RAM for fancy browsers and multimedia can 
still be useful for a server or router.

Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org