Re: LINT file?

2004-03-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
> 
> > 
> > Anyway, my 4.9 LINT has comments.
> > I certainly hope to see them when I get to 5.xxx.
> > 
> 
> You will see them, as Kris noted already, in NOTES. If you want to see
> them in LINT, do something like
> 
> $ cd /usr/src/sys && cat conf/NOTES i386/conf/NOTES > i386/conf/LINT
> 
> :)
> 
>...
> 
> I feel like that this separation of a file needed for developers
> (LINT) and file readable by others (NOTES) nevertheless has some
> sense. For example, one doesn't have to make sure that NOTES is in any
> way compilable, it's `lines that can be cut/pasted into kernel' config
> file. That way, one may be able to enumerate more options, even they
> are mutually exclsive. That's just one reason that came to my
> mind. The reason for splitting notes into conf/NOTES and
> /conf/NOTES seems more obvious: common devices go into the
> former, specific - into the latter.

Well if they are all there and well kept up, it could be OK.  I hope 
near the top of the LINT file there will be a comment referring us to 
that NOTES file then.   It will be helpful to keep down the high blood 
preassure of those of us in a panic.

jerry

> 
> HTH.
> 
> 
> -- 
> DoubleF
> Jesus Saves,
> Moses Invests,
> But only Buddha pays Dividends.
> 
> --Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2004_18_58_01_+0300_DnChs3If.e7IrC0r
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
> 
> iD8DBQFARK8dwo7hT/9lVdwRAiRrAJwLQbjc4M3CYynFLcjrpjDJKayJxwCfSC5c
> pKXb1XITI9bQs+cg/Psk5R4=
> =YaPD
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> --Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2004_18_58_01_+0300_DnChs3If.e7IrC0r--
> 
> 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-03-02 Thread Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:00:05 -0500 (EST)
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:

> > And if you are unable to understand the programming at all, then may 
> > I suggest that you SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
> > 
> 
> Oh now that's a really helpful response.
> 

:(

> 
> Anyway, my 4.9 LINT has comments.
> I certainly hope to see them when I get to 5.xxx.
> 

You will see them, as Kris noted already, in NOTES. If you want to see
them in LINT, do something like

$ cd /usr/src/sys && cat conf/NOTES i386/conf/NOTES > i386/conf/LINT

:)

> 
> Without the comments LINT is essentially useless.
> 

I guess it serves a specific purpose for development: if you try to
compile a kernel with it as the config file, the compiler will attempt
to process most of the OS code.

> 
> Just long lists of cryptic character strings are not
> very helpful, even if there is a man page on every one.
> 

I feel like that this separation of a file needed for developers
(LINT) and file readable by others (NOTES) nevertheless has some
sense. For example, one doesn't have to make sure that NOTES is in any
way compilable, it's `lines that can be cut/pasted into kernel' config
file. That way, one may be able to enumerate more options, even they
are mutually exclsive. That's just one reason that came to my
mind. The reason for splitting notes into conf/NOTES and
/conf/NOTES seems more obvious: common devices go into the
former, specific - into the latter.

HTH.


-- 
DoubleF
Jesus Saves,
Moses Invests,
But only Buddha pays Dividends.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: LINT file?

2004-03-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
> 
> fbsd_user wrote:
> 
> >And you think that, that's ok?
> >
> >Somebody messed up big time removing all the LINT comments.
> >
> >That's totally unacceptable.
> >
> >Aren't you going to submit an problem report about that.
> >
> >That's just so stupid it could not have been done with official
> >approval.
> >
> >There could never be any reason to justify doing that.
> >
> >If defeats the whole purpose of having the LINT kernel max option
> >statement file.
> >
> >You have to point out these blunder by submitting an problem report.
> >
> >Get on the stick and do your volunteer part in keeping Freebsd what
> >we all expect it to be.
> >
> >  
> >
> FBSD_USER,
> 
>#1.) FreeBSD is a VOLUNTEER project
> 
>#2.) Who made you in charge or deciding what's acceptable and not !
> 
>#3.) If you REALLY think it's unacceptable, why not submitt what 
> comments you think should be in there.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> And if you are unable to understand the programming at all, then may 
> I suggest that you SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
> 

Oh now that's a really helpful response.

Anyway, my 4.9 LINT has comments.
I certainly hope to see them when I get to 5.xxx.

Without the comments LINT is essentially useless.
Just long lists of cryptic character strings are not
very helpful, even if there is a man page on every one.

jerry

> 
> / Flame mode off
> 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-03-01 Thread Kosh
fbsd_user wrote:

And you think that, that's ok?

Somebody messed up big time removing all the LINT comments.

That's totally unacceptable.

Aren't you going to submit an problem report about that.

That's just so stupid it could not have been done with official
approval.
There could never be any reason to justify doing that.

If defeats the whole purpose of having the LINT kernel max option
statement file.
You have to point out these blunder by submitting an problem report.

Get on the stick and do your volunteer part in keeping Freebsd what
we all expect it to be.
 

FBSD_USER,

  #1.) FreeBSD is a VOLUNTEER project

  #2.) Who made you in charge or deciding what's acceptable and not !

  #3.) If you REALLY think it's unacceptable, why not submitt what 
comments you think should be in there.



   And if you are unable to understand the programming at all, then may 
I suggest that you SHUT THE FUCK UP!!



/ Flame mode off

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Rowdy wrote:

You would be looking for the NOTES file in /usr/src/sys//conf?

There is also a NOTES file in, erm, /usr/src/sys/conf IIRC.
Thank you. That's exactly what I was looking for. I should have known to 
simply look for it under another name, instead of just giving up early 
when the ls for LINT turned up nothing.

Mea culpa.

	-ste

P.S.: Looking at it, I discovered that there is a "ste" device driver 
and man page, lol. When I pointed it out to my roommate, he said he 
wants to get in touch with the author. He says there's a few feature 
enhancements he'd like, and several nasty bugs he'd like worked out. :)

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:00:21PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> And you think that, that's ok?
> 
> Somebody messed up big time removing all the LINT comments.
> 
> That's totally unacceptable.

Whoa there, tiger! :-)

Look at the NOTES file instead.

Kris


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Rowdy
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:

Matt Emmerton wrote:

cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
make LINT
Note that the LINT kernel is _strictly_ a list of all the possible 
things to
put in your kernel config -- there are no explanatory comments anymore.


That's a shame. I was counting on the comments to educate me. Can you 
point me to any other documentation that might cover what I find in that 
file?

-ste
You would be looking for the NOTES file in /usr/src/sys//conf?

There is also a NOTES file in, erm, /usr/src/sys/conf IIRC.

Dave

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread fbsd_user
And you think that, that's ok?

Somebody messed up big time removing all the LINT comments.

That's totally unacceptable.

Aren't you going to submit an problem report about that.

That's just so stupid it could not have been done with official
approval.

There could never be any reason to justify doing that.

If defeats the whole purpose of having the LINT kernel max option
statement file.

You have to point out these blunder by submitting an problem report.

Get on the stick and do your volunteer part in keeping Freebsd what
we all expect it to be.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Emmerton
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:29 PM
To: Shaun T. Erickson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LINT file?

> If I understand correctly, in previous releases there used to be a
file
> "/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT", that listed all the things one
could put
> in their kernel conf file. I can't find any such file on
5.2.1-RELEASE.
> Can someone please tell me where I can find it or it's replacement
> please? TIA

cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
make LINT

Note that the LINT kernel is _strictly_ a list of all the possible
things to
put in your kernel config -- there are no explanatory comments
anymore.

--
Matt Emmerton

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Matt Emmerton
> Matt Emmerton wrote:
>
> > cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
> > make LINT
> >
> > Note that the LINT kernel is _strictly_ a list of all the possible
things to
> > put in your kernel config -- there are no explanatory comments anymore.
>
> That's a shame. I was counting on the comments to educate me. Can you
> point me to any other documentation that might cover what I find in that
> file?

Well, if you're hunting for things in LINT, you probably should have a good
reason -- the comments in the source are probably what you're after.

--
Matt Emmerton

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Matt Emmerton wrote:

cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
make LINT
Note that the LINT kernel is _strictly_ a list of all the possible things to
put in your kernel config -- there are no explanatory comments anymore.
That's a shame. I was counting on the comments to educate me. Can you 
point me to any other documentation that might cover what I find in that 
file?

	-ste

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Matt Emmerton
> If I understand correctly, in previous releases there used to be a file
> "/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT", that listed all the things one could put
> in their kernel conf file. I can't find any such file on 5.2.1-RELEASE.
> Can someone please tell me where I can find it or it's replacement
> please? TIA

cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
make LINT

Note that the LINT kernel is _strictly_ a list of all the possible things to
put in your kernel config -- there are no explanatory comments anymore.

--
Matt Emmerton

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


LINT file?

2004-02-29 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
If I understand correctly, in previous releases there used to be a file 
"/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT", that listed all the things one could put 
in their kernel conf file. I can't find any such file on 5.2.1-RELEASE. 
Can someone please tell me where I can find it or it's replacement 
please? TIA

	-ste

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"