Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-31 Thread Jud
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:55:47 +0800, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
  Hi, John ...
  
  As you cc'ed doc@, I'm sending your original mail to them
  also, so they'll have some background.  Comments inline.
  
  John Summerfield wrote:
  
  I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose 
  which disk to install onto.
 
  My choices are
  ad0
  da0
 
  Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the 
  panel displayed information such as
  Brand
  Capacity
 
   
 
  
  Read the *text* in the handbook.  As an example, the following
  appears on the page that you linked in your recent crosspost to doc@:
  
 Consider what would happen if you had two IDE hard disks, one
 as the master on the first IDE controller, and one as the master
 on the second IDE controller. If FreeBSD numbered these as it
 found them, as ad0 and ad1 then everything would work.
  
 But if you then added a third disk, as the slave device on the first
 IDE controller, it would now be ad1, and the previous ad1 would  
  
  This goes on for another 3-4 paragraphs; it is a discussion of why 
  FreeBSD
  has basically hardcoded disk drive names/numbers into the kernel, (e.g.,
  why IDE primary master will always be ad0, why secondary slave will always
  be ad3, etc).
  Then again, just above figure 2-16 (which is the same as figure 2-20
  but without an X in the checkbox):
  
  Figure 2-16 
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html#SYSINSTALL-FDISK-DRIVE1
   
  shows an example from a system with two IDE disks.
  They have been called ad0 and ad2.
  
  
  Based on reading these sections/statements of the manual, it would seem
  somewhat obvious that ad0 is the primary master IDE hard disk.  It is
  hard, then, at least for me, to see this as a fault of the documentation.
  
 
 
 The drawback to this is that you're writing from the POV of someone who 
 knows all this.
 
 I'm not, I don't.
 
 I have booted some other installers on this setup and find they do 
 provide more information than the bare OS-dependant name.
 
 Ideally, on my system, the installer would say:
 AD0 Internal IDE drive, primary master, WD102AA 10.2 Gb
 DA0 External USB drive, Cypress ATMR04-0 40 Gb
 
 so most, even modestly, technical people could instantly recognise which 
 disk is which.

Not my intent to join in beating you about the head and shoulders, but
what some folks have been trying to say (perhaps tersely, granted) is
that you're writing to people who (1) all have lots of things to do in
the Real World(tm), (2) have far less idea of how you think the
documentation should read than you do, and (3) if they share your ideas
about what the installer should show, which is not certain, haven't had
time to do anything about it.  Particularly regarding the installer, it
would appear that the change you want is either not trivial, not a
priority, or both.  

Here's how you ought to proceed:

Regarding the documentation, read the Handbook and any other sources you
can find regarding submitting a patch (a requested change) to the
docs, do so, and see if someone with authority to make (commit) the
change agrees with you.

Regarding the installer, see if you can find someone (reading the
freebsd-hackers mailing list might be a place to start) interested in
and capable of making the types of changes you envision, who has time to
spend on the project.

Otherwise, things will remain as they are (actually not horrible from my
point of view - absolutely there is a learning curve, but I strangely
enjoy that sort of thing), since, as others have pointed out, you're
dealing with volunteers.

Hope this helps,

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fwd: Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-31 Thread Jud
It seems we have a volunteer.  ;-)

Devon forgot to cc the list and has asked me to forward this.  I snipped
a bit near the beginning (hope that's OK with you, Devon).

Jud

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:42:03 +0200, Devon H. O'Dell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
  On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:55:47 +0800, John
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Hi, John ...

As you cc'ed doc@, I'm sending your original mail to them
also, so they'll have some background.  Comments inline.

John Summerfield wrote:
[snip]
Based on reading these sections/statements of the manual, it would seem
somewhat obvious that ad0 is the primary master IDE hard disk.  It is
hard, then, at least for me, to see this as a fault of the documentation.

   
   
   The drawback to this is that you're writing from the POV of someone who 
   knows all this.
   
   I'm not, I don't.
   
   I have booted some other installers on this setup and find they do 
   provide more information than the bare OS-dependant name.
   
   Ideally, on my system, the installer would say:
   AD0 Internal IDE drive, primary master, WD102AA 10.2 Gb
   DA0 External USB drive, Cypress ATMR04-0 40 Gb
   
   so most, even modestly, technical people could instantly recognise which 
   disk is which.
  
  Not my intent to join in beating you about the head and shoulders, but
  what some folks have been trying to say (perhaps tersely, granted) is
  that you're writing to people who (1) all have lots of things to do in
  the Real World(tm), (2) have far less idea of how you think the
  documentation should read than you do, and (3) if they share your ideas
  about what the installer should show, which is not certain, haven't had
  time to do anything about it.  Particularly regarding the installer, it
  would appear that the change you want is either not trivial, not a
  priority, or both.  
  
  Here's how you ought to proceed:
  
  Regarding the documentation, read the Handbook and any other sources you
  can find regarding submitting a patch (a requested change) to the
  docs, do so, and see if someone with authority to make (commit) the
  change agrees with you.
  
  Regarding the installer, see if you can find someone (reading the
  freebsd-hackers mailing list might be a place to start) interested in
  and capable of making the types of changes you envision, who has time to
  spend on the project.
  
  Otherwise, things will remain as they are (actually not horrible from my
  point of view - absolutely there is a learning curve, but I strangely
  enjoy that sort of thing), since, as others have pointed out, you're
  dealing with volunteers.
  
  Hope this helps,
  
  Jud
 
 Changes to the installer or documentation regarding this should not be
 difficult to implement. I agree that for a new user, this seems quite
 backwards. It is the perogative of most BSD users and developers that
 new users should ``RTFM''; indeed, most aren't used to this. Our new
 users are generally people with a good idea about how computers work who
 haven't had the need to read a manual through installation before.
 People coming from either a Linux, Mac or Windows camp will not be
 familiar with our naming of IDE and SCSI (and USB mass storage, which
 share SCSI namespace, which can also be confusing) devices.
 
 I'm not against the idea of people needing to learn our OS, but the
 installation procedure shouldn't be a curve at all -- it is a one time
 thing (at least for several days/weeks/months) for many new users. How
 is anybody to know that ad0 means IDE Disk 1 Channel 1 from the
 information that was pointed out in the manual. If one person has a
 problem with it, you can be fairly sure that a number of others have as
 well, and have simply kept their mouth shut (or went over to something
 else) for fear of lambastation.
 
 Take a look at the first statements of your reply:
 
  Not my intent to join in beating you about the head and shoulders, but
  what some folks have been trying to say (perhaps tersely, granted) is
 
 1) ``I'm disclaiming myself if anything I say might offend you'',
 2) ``I acknowledge that others have said offensive things to you''.
 
 This isn't the attitude we need to be bringing to people who are
 bringing problem reports to us.
 
 John: since you've been so kind as to bring the problem report to us,
 I'm sure we'd benefit from your input as to how it should be explained
 in documentation. I'd also be willing to help you privately with
 patching the installer to give a bit more information about the disks.
 
 -- 
 Kind regards,
 
 Devon H. O'Dell   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Key: 4D3D8CA7 | IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Attachment2
Description: PGP signature
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-30 Thread Subhro
What do u mean by difference?

The device ad represents a IDE/ATA disk and the da device represents a
SCSI disk. As you have got one IDE hard disk and one SCSI hard disk in
your box, its showing up as ad0 and da0. But as you say that there is
no SCSI in that box, then something seems to be wrong. Check your BIOS
and disable any onboard SCSI controllers if present

Regards
S.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:11:43 +0800, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Subhro wrote:
  Read the handbook buddy, its clearly given there that
 
 There is no call for that rudeness.
 
 I'm looking at
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html
 figure 2-20 which explains lots of things, but not the difference
 between ad and da devices.
 
  ad = IDE/ATA
  da = SCSI
 
 I have no SCSI in this box.
 
 
 
 
  Regards
  S.
 
  On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:18:39 +0800, John Summerfield
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which
 disk to install onto.
 
 My choices are
 ad0
 da0
 
 Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the panel
 displayed information such as
 Brand
 Capacity
 
 Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the
 BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.
 
 The website doesn't help.
 
 I'm not on any list. Please respond by
 a) Fixing the web page
 b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I
 can't discover by other means which is which.
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 


-- 
Subhro Sankha Kar
School of Information Technology
Block AQ-13/1 Sector V
ZIP 700091
India
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-30 Thread John
Subhro wrote:
What do u mean by difference?
 

That page does not mention da devices at all.
The device ad represents a IDE/ATA disk and the da device represents a
SCSI disk. As you have got one IDE hard disk and one SCSI hard disk in
your box, its showing up as ad0 and da0. But as you say that there is
no SCSI in that box, then something seems to be wrong. Check your BIOS
and disable any onboard SCSI controllers if present
 

There are no SCSI controllers. It's your basic cheap Acer desktop 
Pentium III of a few years ago.

As I said already, I have no SCSI in this box.

Regards
S.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:11:43 +0800, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Subhro wrote:
   

Read the handbook buddy, its clearly given there that
 

There is no call for that rudeness.
I'm looking at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html
figure 2-20 which explains lots of things, but not the difference
between ad and da devices.
   

ad = IDE/ATA
da = SCSI
 

I have no SCSI in this box.

   

Regards
S.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:18:39 +0800, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which
disk to install onto.
My choices are
ad0
da0
Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the panel
displayed information such as
Brand
Capacity
Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the
BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.
The website doesn't help.
I'm not on any list. Please respond by
a) Fixing the web page
b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I
can't discover by other means which is which.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

 

   


 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-30 Thread John
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Hi, John ...
As you cc'ed doc@, I'm sending your original mail to them
also, so they'll have some background.  Comments inline.
John Summerfield wrote:
I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose 
which disk to install onto.

My choices are
ad0
da0
Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the 
panel displayed information such as
Brand
Capacity

 

Read the *text* in the handbook.  As an example, the following
appears on the page that you linked in your recent crosspost to doc@:
   Consider what would happen if you had two IDE hard disks, one
   as the master on the first IDE controller, and one as the master
   on the second IDE controller. If FreeBSD numbered these as it
   found them, as ad0 and ad1 then everything would work.
   But if you then added a third disk, as the slave device on the first
   IDE controller, it would now be ad1, and the previous ad1 would  
This goes on for another 3-4 paragraphs; it is a discussion of why 
FreeBSD
has basically hardcoded disk drive names/numbers into the kernel, (e.g.,
why IDE primary master will always be ad0, why secondary slave will always
be ad3, etc).
Then again, just above figure 2-16 (which is the same as figure 2-20
but without an X in the checkbox):

Figure 2-16 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html#SYSINSTALL-FDISK-DRIVE1 
shows an example from a system with two IDE disks.
They have been called ad0 and ad2.

Based on reading these sections/statements of the manual, it would seem
somewhat obvious that ad0 is the primary master IDE hard disk.  It is
hard, then, at least for me, to see this as a fault of the documentation.

The drawback to this is that you're writing from the POV of someone who 
knows all this.

I'm not, I don't.
I have booted some other installers on this setup and find they do 
provide more information than the bare OS-dependant name.

Ideally, on my system, the installer would say:
AD0 Internal IDE drive, primary master, WD102AA 10.2 Gb
DA0 External USB drive, Cypress ATMR04-0 40 Gb
so most, even modestly, technical people could instantly recognise which 
disk is which.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-30 Thread John
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which 
disk to install onto.

My choices are
ad0
da0
Great. How do I know which disk is which? 

OK  ad0 would be the first ide drive and da0 would be the first SCSI
drive or maybe the first USB drive.

Thanks Jerry

 _I_ could work it out if the panel 
displayed information such as
Brand
Capacity

Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the 
BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.

If your BIOS doesn't detect your drives you have problems to deal
with before you get to installing FreeBSD.

The website doesn't help.
I'm not on any list. Please respond by
a) Fixing the web page
b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I 
can't discover by other means which is which.

Try not giving orders to volunteers.  It is tacky and won't get
you anywhere.Maybe you should learn enough to fix the DOC yourself
and submit a change.
I'm new to FreeBSD and this is my first look at it. I think your 
suggestion a little tacky.

I'm sorry that you felt I was giving orders, that was not my intent. In 
my defence though, as I said in another post, thought I was talking 
directly to someone responsible for the content, and explaining that I 
find that content confusing.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-30 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 Jerry McAllister wrote:
 I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which 
 disk to install onto.
 
 My choices are
 ad0
 da0
 
 Great. How do I know which disk is which? 
  
  
  OK  ad0 would be the first ide drive and da0 would be the first SCSI
  drive or maybe the first USB drive.
 
 Thanks Jerry
 
  
 The website doesn't help.
 
 I'm not on any list. Please respond by
 a) Fixing the web page
 b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I 
 can't discover by other means which is which.
  
  Try not giving orders to volunteers.  It is tacky and won't get
  you anywhere.Maybe you should learn enough to fix the DOC yourself
  and submit a change.
 
 I'm new to FreeBSD and this is my first look at it. I think your 
 suggestion a little tacky.

It is the standard FreeBSD and other Freeware/open source suggestion.
Since it is all done by volunteers, if you find something that needs
improving, you are the first in line to do it.

 I'm sorry that you felt I was giving orders, that was not my intent. In 
 my defence though, as I said in another post, thought I was talking 
 directly to someone responsible for the content, and explaining that I 
 find that content confusing.

Live and learn.  Newbie questions are welcome/encouraged, but remember
you are getting help from those who doing it out of their own sense
of community and support for the FreeBSD philosophy, not paid consultants.

jerry

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Which disk is which

2004-08-29 Thread John Summerfield
I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which 
disk to install onto.

My choices are
ad0
da0

Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the panel 
displayed information such as
Brand
Capacity

Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the 
BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.

The website doesn't help.

I'm not on any list. Please respond by
a) Fixing the web page
b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I 
can't discover by other means which is which.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-29 Thread Juha Saarinen
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:18:39 +0800, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which
 disk to install onto.
 
 My choices are
 ad0
 da0
 
 Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the panel
 displayed information such as
 Brand
 Capacity

ad = ATA
da = SCSI
 
 Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the
 BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.
 
 The website doesn't help.
 
 I'm not on any list. Please respond by
 a) Fixing the web page
 b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I
 can't discover by other means which is which.
 

-- 

Juha
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which disk is which

2004-08-29 Thread Subhro
Read the handbook buddy, its clearly given there that
ad = IDE/ATA
da = SCSI

Regards
S.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:18:39 +0800, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've booted a 5.2.1 miniinstall CD and got to the point where I choose which
 disk to install onto.
 
 My choices are
 ad0
 da0
 
 Great. How do I know which disk is which? _I_ could work it out if the panel
 displayed information such as
 Brand
 Capacity
 
 Note: DOS names would be worse than useless because I don't use DOS, and the
 BIOS doesn't detect all my drives.
 
 The website doesn't help.
 
 I'm not on any list. Please respond by
 a) Fixing the web page
 b) Mailing me the necessary info (eg the fixed page when it's done) in case I
 can't discover by other means which is which.
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
Subhro Sankha Kar
School of Information Technology
Block AQ-13/1 Sector V
ZIP 700091
India
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]