cvsup question
Hi cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/cvsup/cvsup-ports.conf I have next conf for cvsup cat cvsup-ports.conf *default host=cvsup6.jp.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs date=2008.10.15.00.00.00 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-databases date=2008.10.15.00.00.00 But when I update I see 'edits' on 2011 year despite on I notice to use 2008 year Edit ports/databases/zodb3/pkg-plist Add delta 1.13 2011.11.21.07.12.23 wen Add delta 1.12 2011.02.14.01.08.24 wen Add delta 1.11 2011.02.13.01.39.46 wen Add delta 1.10 2010.10.12.13.38.46 wen How that can be? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
CVSup question
Hi, I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow. If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to have 'src-all? *default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_11 *default delete use-rel-suffix compress # src-all ports-all tag=. thanks, Simon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow. If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to have 'src-all? *default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_11 *default delete use-rel-suffix compress # src-all ports-all tag=. Yes and oyu don't need tag=. also since that is the default value -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHXxBrzIOMjAek4JIRAhLPAJ4wmwl7Vzqv7F29Q9QOY+F3+wPiPACfbyDf fJ7e1hG8+cHRNpdy8Esg5Wc= =D014 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:34:19 -0500 Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow. If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to have 'src-all? ... Yes and oyu don't need tag=. also since that is the default value And that's yes to: port-all is enough, not yes to do I really need to have src-all? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last CVSup question.
Hopefullly! I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps. Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true? I have always found the mergemaster process confusing. -Grant ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Last CVSup question.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote: Hopefullly! I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps. Can skip? Sometimes. Ought to skip? No. Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true? I have always found the mergemaster process confusing. IF you do not update the files under /etc then you run a very real risk of things breaking in strange ways. Mergemaster is very useful tool for updating those files. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Last CVSup question.
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote: I have always found the mergemaster process confusing. Mergemaster is very useful tool for updating those files. Updating: yes, but I never managed to merge two files successfully and always end up making the modifications manually. Peter -- http://www.boosten.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup question
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to get it working. I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put 0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these commands: sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i '*ulators/win*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports But I don't see the standard patch applications I would see when something is updating with any of them. What am I doing wrong? -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:56:31 Jim Stapleton wrote: I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to get it working. I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put 0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these commands: sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i '*ulators/win*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports But I don't see the standard patch applications I would see when something is updating with any of them. What am I doing wrong? -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i did -i ports/emulators/wine and it worked for me. hth, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:56:31 -0400 Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to get it working. I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put 0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these commands: sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i '*ulators/win*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports But I don't see the standard patch applications I would see when something is updating with any of them. What am I doing wrong? I don't know, but I use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade when I want to do this kind of thing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSup question
Hi, I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? Simon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD (tag=.). HTH, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such things as stable or current ports? Simon Joe Holden wrote: Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD (tag=.). HTH, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
Simon Gao wrote: What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such things as stable or current ports? Simon Joe Holden wrote: Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD (tag=.). HTH, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can update ports to a release date, or infact an actual date. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
Simon Gao wrote: What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such things as stable or current ports? Simon Joe Holden wrote: Simon Gao wrote: Hi, I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD (tag=.). HTH, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No such thing as -stable or -current ports. Patrick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Simon Gao wrote: What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such things as stable or current ports? You got the right answer the first time. You will get the appropriate ports tree (updated) with the . tag. If you use any other tag, you will destroy your ports tree. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSup question
Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_supfile After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my problem. Thanks. Charlie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
Charlie McElfresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_supfile After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my problem. Thanks. $ grep php5-cgi /usr/ports/* /usr/ports/MOVED:www/php5-cgi|lang/php5|2006-05-06|Unification of php slave ports $ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_supfile After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my problem. Thanks. Charlie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] what you are probably looking for is now found in lang/php5-extensions. hth, jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:20:03AM -0800, Charlie McElfresh wrote: After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. Check out Freshports: http://www.freshports.org/commits.php This gives you an overview of recently changed ports. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgpkrsiGoO8SE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: CVSup question
php5-cgi hasn't been a separate port for some time. Try make config in lang/php5. ~BAS On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote: Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line ports-all in my cvs_supfile After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there. I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my problem. Thanks. Charlie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ ...from back in the heady days when helpdesk meant nothing, diskquota meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup question - use just one supfile?
Hi, I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? Something like: *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix this can't be the correct syntax, but is this practicable? thanks, -- Joel Hatton -- Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question - use just one supfile?
At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote: Hi, I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? Something like: *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix this can't be the correct syntax, but is this practicable? You need a different prefix for each tag. You'll still want to set your defaults, then override them as necessary, like this: src-all prefix=/foo tag=RELENG_5 src-all prefix=/bar tag=RELENG_6 -Glenn thanks, -- Joel Hatton -- Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup question
How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? -- Regards , Vasile C pgpwwFwjDujVT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cvsup question
Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote: Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... -- Regards , Vasile C If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem. UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity. pgpTR7G0U0h9u.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cvsup question
Vasile C wrote: A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. I hope this is a testbed and is not a production system. Automaticly running portupgrade on a production system is a mistake... -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvsup question Wrote these words of wisdom: I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote: Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... -- Regards , Vasile C If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem. UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity. * REPLY SEPARATOR * On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: I have a script, run from CRON also, that runs cvsup, portsdb -Uu and then portupgrade. Since each succeeding program will not run until the preceding one has finished, I have no need to change the timing on cvsup. Are you perhaps trying to run each program individually from CRON, rather than through a script? -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Smith Wesson beats four aces. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ? Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ? On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:54, Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvsup question Wrote these words of wisdom: I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote: Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... -- Regards , Vasile C If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem. UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity. * REPLY SEPARATOR * On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: I have a script, run from CRON also, that runs cvsup, portsdb -Uu and then portupgrade. Since each succeeding program will not run until the preceding one has finished, I have no need to change the timing on cvsup. Are you perhaps trying to run each program individually from CRON, rather than through a script? -- Regards , Vasile C If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem. UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity. pgpB6LDoaFm2M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cvsup question
Vasile C wrote: Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ? Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ? Not without modifying the source code to cvsup. What I recommend you do is add the '-1' flag to your cvsup command line -- so cvsup will try once to pull down the updates and then exit. Then you can use a trivial bit of shell scripting to try again if the first attempt failed, although you should try to cvsup from a different server if you need to retry. eg. #!/bin/sh CVSUP=/usr/local/bin/cvsup CVSUPFLAGS=-1 -g -L2 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile CVSUPSERVERS=' cvsup.xx.freebsd.org cvsup.yy.freebsd.org cvsup.zz.freebsd.org ' OTHERCMDS=portsdb -Uu portupgrade for $h in $CVSUPSERVERS ; do $CVSUP -h $h $CVSUPFLAGS \ $OTHERCMDS\ break done Note: untested code intended only as an outline of what you might do -- will need some work before suitable for serious use. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup question
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one questions for those who used it. is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all also is this configuration decent, in your opinion *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org *default tag=. *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress ports-all tag=. #src-all (pending feedback) -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
Steve wrote: am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one questions for those who used it. is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all also is this configuration decent, in your opinion *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org *default tag=. *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress ports-all tag=. #src-all (pending feedback) -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what I use. src-all. Michael -- Michael D. Whities [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.one-arm.com -- There are four colors of hats to watch for: Black, White, Grey, and Red. The meanings are: Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
Steve wrote: am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one questions for those who used it. is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all Depends on whether you want to update the OS as well as the 3rd party software (ports). also is this configuration decent, in your opinion *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org *default tag=. *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress ports-all tag=. #src-all (pending feedback) Hmm, never used seperate tags in the same SUPfile, but I guess that cvsup is smart enough to do that, considering what it does do. For a discussion of the release tags, see the Cutting Edge chapter in the FreeBSD handbook[1]. Please do note that you most likely *want* to use tag=. for ports, but *not for source*. You probably want the latest releases of ports, but it's not nearly so likely you want to be running HEAD/CURRENT on your system Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. [1]For 4-STABLE, for example, your cvsup app should be looking for src files tagged RELENG_4. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
On Friday 23 July 2004 08:54 am, Steve wrote: am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one questions for those who used it. is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all also is this configuration decent, in your opinion *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org *default tag=. *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress ports-all tag=. #src-all (pending feedback) -- Steve Rieger == Hi Steve, Your supfile line that has *default tag=. is going to download source code for current when you uncomment the #src-all line. If you're intending to follow current, that's fine. But, if you're going for 4.10 or 5.2.1, then you need a different default tag line. Until you go through the makeworld sequence, it won't bite you, on second thought, it probably will. Below is the supfile that I use: *default tag=RELENG_5_2 *default host=cvsup15.FreeBSD.org *default prefix=/usr *default base=/usr *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix #src-all ports-all tag=. #doc-all I would suggest using sysutils/fastest_cvsup. You can either do a pkg_add -r, or build it from the ports. If you just installed FreeBSD, I would do a src-all to get all the latest patches, and after that to get new patches Other than that, you're just using bandwidth. There are more changes going on in the ports, so you would be upgrading there the most. Be sure to read usr/src/UPGRADING and usr/ports/UPGRADING. Don ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSUP question
Greetings, I installed 5.1-release on a box. I installed cvsup from ports. I then copied /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-sup /etc. I changed the file to point to a CVS server near me. The notes I was reading were specific to Freebsd 4.6. Since I had 5.1 installed I guessed I needed to choose RELENG_5 to track 5.1 stable. I then added the following lines to the bottom of the file: ports-www tag=. ports-net tag=. ports-security tag=. ports-sysutils tag=. I then did a cvsup /etc/stable-supfile. The system trundled away, showing on the screen file deletions, etc. When it finished (without any errors, and telling me it was sucessful), I tried to cd /usr/src. The directory was gone. Hmm So, I modified the stable-sup file to use RELENG_5_1. Then did a cvsup /etc/stable-supfile. But once it connected to the cvsup server, it just hung. If I want to track 5.1-stable, what should I use ? thanks, Darryl ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?
I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not updated the system since install I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current, no? And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch? Thanks for the clarification. -- Bob Play is the work of children. It's very serious stuff. And if it's properly structured in a developmental program, children can blossom. -Bob Keeshan aka `Captain Kangaroo' ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:57:59AM -0500, Bob Collins wrote: I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not updated the system since install See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html to quote: RELENG_4 The line of development for FreeBSD-4.X, also known as FreeBSD-STABLE. RELENG_4_9 The release branch for FreeBSD-4.9, used only for security advisories and other critical fixes. I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current, no? And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch? No to the first question, yes to the second :P HTH -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - Another FreeBSD Diary http://ipfwstats.sf.net/- ipfw peruser traffic logging ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?
Selon Bob Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not updated the system since install For your system, use RELENG_4_9; tag=RELENG_4_9; this will keep you up to date with the security fixes. For the ports, always use CURRENT; tag=. I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current, no? And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch? RELENG_4 will update you to 4-STABLE (the future 4.10 if there's one). Antoine ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:57:59 -0500, Bob Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not updated the system since install I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current, no? No. No such thing as 4.9-CURRENT. RELENG_4 will update to 4-STABLE, which means it includes whatever updates have been made to -STABLE since the 4.9-RELEASE snapshot (4.x-RELEASE being a snapshot of 4-STABLE). And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch? 4.9 isn't a branch itself, it's a snapshot of the -STABLE branch. RELENG_4_9 contains only critical updates from the 4.9-RELEASE snapshot, primarily if not exclusively security updates. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup question
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:01:15 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm running Freebsd 5.1 and I noticed in the Freebsd ftp website, current has some new port versions. I modified my cvs-supfile based on what I read in the handbook: src-all ports-all cvs-root all *default tag=. *default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/home/ncvs *default release=cvs delete compress *default delete use-rel-suffix When I checked /usr/ports, nothing has changed, what am I missing??? Wisdom would say you to have only one cvsup file for ports like this : *default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-all please use *default compress unless you have a goo connection. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup question
Hi all, I'm running Freebsd 5.1 and I noticed in the Freebsd ftp website, current has some new port versions. I modified my cvs-supfile based on what I read in the handbook: src-all ports-all cvs-root all *default tag=. *default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/home/ncvs *default release=cvs delete compress *default delete use-rel-suffix When I checked /usr/ports, nothing has changed, what am I missing??? Thank you ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVSup question
I am trying to upgrade a 4.5 box to RELENG_4, but it doesn't appear that I am getting all of the required info. Here's my command, and supfile: # cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile *default tag=RELENG_4 *default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org *default release=cvs *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr/src *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all ports-all When it says it is complete, this is the list of my /usr/src/directory: drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 crypto drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberos5 drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberosIV drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 secure drwxr-xr-x 47 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 21:51 sys Do I have to install all the sources off of the CD at install time to be able to update the source in order to buildworld? BTW, the error is don't know how to make buildworld which is understood, as there is no Makefile being cvsup'd. Tks To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: CVSup question
Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to upgrade a 4.5 box to RELENG_4, but it doesn't appear that I am getting all of the required info. Here's my command, and supfile: # cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile *default tag=RELENG_4 *default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org *default release=cvs *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup I think you mean base=/usr *default prefix=/usr/src I think you mean prefix=/usr (it could be almost anywhere, but putting it in /usr/src is almost asking to shoot yourself in the foot later) *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all ports-all When it says it is complete, this is the list of my /usr/src/directory: drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 crypto drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberos5 drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberosIV drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Nov 14 16:46 secure drwxr-xr-x 47 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 21:51 sys Do I have to install all the sources off of the CD at install time to be able to update the source in order to buildworld? Absolutely not. BTW, the error is don't know how to make buildworld which is understood, as there is no Makefile being cvsup'd. That makefile is /usr/local/etc/cvsup/src/Makefile, I suspect. At least, that's where you asked cvsup to put it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
cvsup question
This is more of a minor annoyance, but I can't seem to fix it. I'm tired of portsdb -Uu spitting out errors regarding not finding japanese ports. I initially had all of the non-english ports in my refuse file, since i have zero use for them, but i've removed these entries with the thinking that 'I have ample space and it doesn't hurt for them to be there if i can quiet the output of portsdb -Uu' but using 'ports-all' in my ports-supfile isn't grabbing the japanese, or any other language for that matter (except portuguese and hungarian). Like I said, this is more of a minor annoyance, but if anyone knows a fix, that would be great. thanks. .daniel.schrock To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: cvsup question
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 10:34 am, Daniel Schrock wrote: This is more of a minor annoyance, but I can't seem to fix it. I'm tired of portsdb -Uu spitting out errors regarding not finding japanese ports. Try cd /usr/ports make index portsdb -u I have incorporated this sequence in my uports script because of the many error message. You also get the full list when you use make index. Make will die at the first port that is missing and so you can't have ports in your refuse file. BTW, if you do this everytime, you might as well add ports/INDEX to your ports-all refuse file. There isn't any reason to re-transfer a 3.05 MB file when you are going to create it as soon as you finish cvsuping. Kent I initially had all of the non-english ports in my refuse file, since i have zero use for them, but i've removed these entries with the thinking that 'I have ample space and it doesn't hurt for them to be there if i can quiet the output of portsdb -Uu' but using 'ports-all' in my ports-supfile isn't grabbing the japanese, or any other language for that matter (except portuguese and hungarian). Like I said, this is more of a minor annoyance, but if anyone knows a fix, that would be great. thanks. .daniel.schrock To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Silly cvsup question.
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, mike wrote: Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. Any help on this is appreciated, and no need to CC me, as my website mirrors your archives and they will soon span across multiple pages as well as be searchable. Add the following line to your supfile: *default delete Marco Radzinschi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 8 18:36:02 EST 2002 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Silly cvsup question.
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. cvsup isn't going to be very good at tracking which files have been deleted on the original, unless you are pulling from a cvs repository (that's where it keeps information on directory contents). Otherwise, it won't know whether a file has been deleted from the original machine, or is a local modification on the duplicate. Given that you're not using cvs, you'd probably do better with rsync for this job. You could also use other tools that can keep metadata, like dump(8) or even use the incremental facilities of Gnu tar. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Silly cvsup question.
On 8 Dec 2002, Lowell Gilbert wrote: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. cvsup isn't going to be very good at tracking which files have been deleted on the original, unless you are pulling from a cvs repository (that's where it keeps information on directory contents). Otherwise, it won't know whether a file has been deleted from the original machine, or is a local modification on the duplicate. Given that you're not using cvs, you'd probably do better with rsync for this job. You could also use other tools that can keep metadata, like dump(8) or even use the incremental facilities of Gnu tar. This is not accurate, as the cvsup CLIENT keeps directory information for the repository. When the client is run, if a file has been added on the server, it will download it. If a file has changed on the server, it will use the rsync algorithm to synchronize the files. If the client is set to delete files, it will also delete any files that it has and which the server does not. I know because I use it at work to synchronize tens of thousands of images. Rsync works, but it does not scale very well. I had to use cvsupd and cvsup because the memory usage of rsync would grow past 512 MB and it would eventually core dump. Marco Radzinschi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 8 22:13:51 EST 2002 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Silly cvsup question. (CLOSED)
On 8 Dec 2002, Lowell Gilbert wrote: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. cvsup isn't going to be very good at tracking which files have been deleted on the original, unless you are pulling from a cvs repository (that's where it keeps information on directory contents). Otherwise, it won't know whether a file has been deleted from the original machine, or is a local modification on the duplicate. Given that you're not using cvs, you'd probably do better with rsync for this job. You could also use other tools that can keep metadata, like dump(8) or even use the incremental facilities of Gnu tar. This is not accurate, as the cvsup CLIENT keeps directory information for the repository. When the client is run, if a file has been added on the server, it will download it. If a file has changed on the server, it will use the rsync algorithm to synchronize the files. If the client is set to delete files, it will also delete any files that it has and which the server does not. I know because I use it at work to synchronize tens of thousands of images. Rsync works, but it does not scale very well. I had to use cvsupd and cvsup because the memory usage of rsync would grow past 512 MB and it would eventually core dump. Marco Radzinschi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 8 22:13:51 EST 2002 Its true. I added *default delete to my sup file, and i made a test dir ran it once, then i rm the test folder, and ran it again. and it worked. thanks to all that that could and did respond. Now i got a perfect backup solution. I simply zip -r cvsup-backup on labs2 monthly or so and burn it to cdr, and thats assuming some day BOTH of my freebsd servers go bad? i think not.. -- -mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network administrator The unixhideout network http://www.unixhideout.com Need to get a hold of me? finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Free email that kicks ass from UnixHideout The UnixHideout network http://www.unixhideout.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Silly cvsup question.
Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. Any help on this is appreciated, and no need to CC me, as my website mirrors your archives and they will soon span across multiple pages as well as be searchable. -- -mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network administrator The unixhideout network http://www.unixhideout.com Need to get a hold of me? finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Free email that kicks ass from UnixHideout The UnixHideout network http://www.unixhideout.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Silly cvsup question.
mike wrote: Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE something from /home/mike (or whereever) It never gets deleted from labs2. So its not synching correctly. For example i just went to zip -r cvsup-backup cvsup-backup on labs2, so i can pull it to XP and burn it, and i realized it had my library still in there which i deleted months ago. Any help on this is appreciated, and no need to CC me, as my website mirrors your archives and they will soon span across multiple pages as well as be searchable. I do not know how to do it using cvsup, but if you use a simple cvs-repository, it will work fine if you do a cvs up on your backup machine (regular check in preconditioned). But if you use cvs, it may have much more sense to backup the entire repository, because you have all made changes available after a restore. Jens -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack LW W W L i W W W W i nnnLiWing IT-Services L iW W W Wi n n g g i W W i n n g gFriesenstraße 2 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91ggg e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
CVSUP Question
What port does CVSUP use when syncing up? I'm behind a firewall and can not get CVSUP to work from my system at work, but it works just fine at home. I'm wondering if it's a blocked port. If that's the case is it possible to get it to use a different port? Anthony To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
