Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread Roman Shterenzon

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roman
> Shterenzon w
> rites:
> > Hi,
> > I've just got ADSL at home (using mpd-netgraph, Archie - it's really cool:) )
> > .
> > After some amount of data passed through the line, I'm getting:
> > sendto: No buffer space available
> > even for ping (!)
> >
> > alchemy:/home/mapc% netstat -m
> > 178/880/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
> > 148 mbufs allocated to data
> > 26 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> > 4 mbufs allocated to fragment reassembly queue headers
> > 143/240/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> > 700 Kbytes allocated to network (22% of mb_map in use)
> > 0 requests for memory denied
> > 0 requests for memory delayed
> > 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> >
> > Thus, I don't see mbuf starvation. What could it be? Perhaps it's some other
> > error which is reported incorrectly? This is 4.3-RC2 kernel.
>
> I had this problem with a 3C509B card when pushing a lot of data
> through to a slower machine on my network.  ifconfig ep0 down; ifconfig
> ep0 up fixed the problem when it occurred, however it would occur a
> number of times a day.  I ultimately replaced the 3C509B.

I've 3c905B xl(4). I hadn't had any problems with it before I received
ADSL modem.
Ideas, anyone?

> Regards, Phone:  (250)387-8437
> Cy SchubertFax:  (250)387-5766
> Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
> Province of BC
>
>
>

--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread G D McKee

Hi

I had one of these cards and I couldn't get the Cable modem to talk to the
card at all.  It wouldn't even pick up an IP address!!  Put a PCI 3com card
in the box and all has been fine ever since.

Gordon
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Shterenzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: sendto: No buffer space available


> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roman
> > Shterenzon w
> > rites:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've just got ADSL at home (using mpd-netgraph, Archie - it's really
cool:) )
> > > .
> > > After some amount of data passed through the line, I'm getting:
> > > sendto: No buffer space available
> > > even for ping (!)
> > >
> > > alchemy:/home/mapc% netstat -m
> > > 178/880/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
> > > 148 mbufs allocated to data
> > > 26 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> > > 4 mbufs allocated to fragment reassembly queue headers
> > > 143/240/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> > > 700 Kbytes allocated to network (22% of mb_map in use)
> > > 0 requests for memory denied
> > > 0 requests for memory delayed
> > > 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> > >
> > > Thus, I don't see mbuf starvation. What could it be? Perhaps it's some
other
> > > error which is reported incorrectly? This is 4.3-RC2 kernel.
> >
> > I had this problem with a 3C509B card when pushing a lot of data
> > through to a slower machine on my network.  ifconfig ep0 down; ifconfig
> > ep0 up fixed the problem when it occurred, however it would occur a
> > number of times a day.  I ultimately replaced the 3C509B.
>
> I've 3c905B xl(4). I hadn't had any problems with it before I received
> ADSL modem.
> Ideas, anyone?
>
> > Regards, Phone:  (250)387-8437
> > Cy SchubertFax:  (250)387-5766
> > Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
> > Province of BC
> >
> >
> >
>
> --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
> [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Linux 2.2.18 vs. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE

2001-04-02 Thread Kal Torak

Mike Harding wrote:
> 
> Uh - april fools.  Slashdot is owned by VA Linux or another Linux
> related company.


Yeah I know it was april fools, but like I said, the points made in
it are actualy very true... And like you say they couldnt change even
if they wanted to since they are now owned by VALinux...

I think they have some FreeBSD box's there for something tho...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: 4.3 Release candidate #2 now ready

2001-04-02 Thread Oliver Fromme

Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > Due to the recent security fixes which went into the tree, along with
 > the fact that I'll be following a very large moving truck on Monday
 > and will be somewhat busy, I'm releasing the second release candidate
 > image today instead of monday.

I've also made two ISO images of 4.3-RC2 available at
ftp7.de.freebsd.org:

-rw-rw-r--  1 inof  bsd  430229504 Apr 02 15:45 4.3-RC2-combi.iso
-rw-rw-r--  1 inof  bsd   49283072 Apr 02 15:54 4.3-RC2-mini.iso

The "mini" ISO (47 Mbytes) contains ONLY the "bin" dist,
so you can do a minimal install with this one, no more.
You'll have to get everything else from the network once
you've brought a machine up and running with this ISO.
   
The "combi" ISO (410 Mbytes) contains the complete base
system, the ports collection framework (but no distfiles
nor packages), XFree86, _and_ this CD also contains a
Live Filesystem, so you can use it as a "fixit" CD, too!

I haven't tested either of these (due to lack of CD-Rs
right now), but I'm pretty confident that the ISOs work
fine.

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

"All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: RC2 wrongness in INSTALL.TXT

2001-04-02 Thread jack

Today Nik Clayton wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 12:20:22PM -0700, Jordan K Hubbard wrote:
> > Man, people are still reading those instructions? :-)
> > 
> > I agree that they're wrong but I'm about to go off the air for 4 days
> > in about 10 minutes here so I can't fix them myself.  If anyone would

Actually  ftp:*:99:99::0:0:FTP:/cdrom:/sbin/nologin IS correct,
the password is not checked for `ftp' or `anonymous'.


--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
  Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
   PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67   FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD
   enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null
--
A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer is to computing what
a McDonalds Certified Food Specialist is to fine cuisine.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC

2001-04-02 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.

> * Karsten W. Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 01:17]:
> > it seems. i installed the patch (my apache is NOT built from ports) and

> The patch has been merged into the port now, so perhaps cvsupping
> and rebuilding the port will fix it.
> If not, let the maintainer know.

He's not using the ports, just this patch, probably should be using the
ports though.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread Roman Shterenzon


I just hope that you don't mistake the cards.
There's 3c509 isa ep(4) card, which is buggy and there's
3c905B and 3c905C pci cards xl(4) cards, which are known to be good.
I'm not sure which is better, xl of fxp, both are fine.
How can I debug this problem? It occures ramdomly, but when it does,
there's some pattern:

64 bytes from 192.115.106.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=251 time=30.161 ms
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
64 bytes from 192.115.106.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=251 time=30.842 ms
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
64 bytes from 192.115.106.10: icmp_seq=34 ttl=251 time=30.638 ms
ping: sendto: No buffer space available

There's some pattern here..

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Tomaz Borstnar wrote:

> At 16:31 2.4.01, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> > > I've just got ADSL at home (using mpd-netgraph, Archie - it's really
> > cool:) )
> > > After some amount of data passed through the line, I'm getting:
> > > sendto: No buffer space available
> >I had this problem with a 3C509B card when pushing a lot of data
> >through to a slower machine on my network.  ifconfig ep0 down; ifconfig
> >ep0 up fixed the problem when it occurred, however it would occur a
> >number of times a day.  I ultimately replaced the 3C509B.
> Interesting. I have exactly this problem with this card. It happens usually
> after lots of data transfers and after variable numbers of uptime days.
>
> Tomaz
>
>

--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC

2001-04-02 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

okay
set servername in main config: segv problems are gone with or without
the patch
/k

David W. Chapman Jr.([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.31 22:22:58 +:
> does that have anything to do with this
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/apache13/files/patch-util.c
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ron Klinkien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Dan Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Stable List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC
> 
> 
> > why that? if dns works... it should not be a problem.
> > that issue puzzles me a bit
> > /k
> >
> > Ron Klinkien([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.30 22:28:49 +:
> > > Make sure your /etc/hosts file is up to date. ie. it
> > > lists the ip adress of the host you run apache on.
> > >
> > > Ron.
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Dan Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "FreeBSD Stable List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 6:50 PM
> > > Subject: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC
> > >
> > >
> > > > Does anyone have a clue why I get these segfaults?
> > > >
> > > > (The apache port installed is /usr/ports/www/apache13 with no
> > > > optimizations or extra modules)
> > > >
> > > > I have attached the debug and dmesg.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > +--
> > > > Dan Larsson  | Tel:   +46 8 550 120 21
> > > > Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax:   +46 8 550 120 02
> > > > GPG and PGP keys | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> >
> > --
> > > "I didn't change a thing and from the moment I didn't change it,
> > > it didn't work anymore." -- Anonymous
> > KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> >
> 

-- 
> Floppy now, hard later.
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Linux 2.2.18 vs. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE

2001-04-02 Thread Robert Banniza

Not to start a flame war here but I'd be willing to bet that Slashdot does
NOT move to FreeBSD. If you noticed, yesterday was April Fool's Day and
there are always jokes on Slashdot on 4/01. With that said, I like FreeBSD
better than Linux but I believe /. is pulling your leg.

Robert

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kal Torak wrote:

> "Victor R. Cardona" wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:29:03AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> > > As much as I prefer FreeBSD over Linux, I think you have more proof of
> > > moron "installers" there; we have both FreeBSD and SuSE Linux (and I
> > > personally support the latter, including 7.1), and neither has any such
> > > problems in my experience.  Both support mostly the same hardware.
> > >
> > > (SuSE and Debian go a long way toward making Linux tolerable, if not the
> > > quality OS that FreeBSD is.)
> > 
> > I have to second that. I use SuSE on my workstations, and FreeBSD on
> > servers, and am happy with both.
> 
> 
> I have to totaly dissagree... Linux is crap! Not only is its development
> totaly disorganised, let alone the fact there is billions of dists, its
> really only a toy... There is no way they can make linux even close to
> tolerable!
> 
> FreeBSD everywhere! Even slashdot is moving to FreeBSD cos they had enough
> of linux!
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH

On Monday, April 02, 2001 06:51:15 PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+-
| 3c905B and 3c905C pci cards xl(4) cards, which are known to be good.
+--->8

Er, I just resolved a problem where 4.2-RELEASE and later (unknown about 
earlier) would start spewing "microuptime() went backwards" which went away 
completely when I replaced the 3c905B with a NetGear FA311.  I could 
reliably reproduce this by exercising network and disk simultaneously, e.g. 
by scping large files to the host.  This happened off and on with two 
different machines whose only common factor was the use of a 3c905B card 
(and not even the same card).

-- 
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administrator[WAY too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
electrical and computer engineering   KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



vmstat, iostat, top, and systat don't show CPU %

2001-04-02 Thread Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group

For about a week I've been seeing outputs from vmstat that look like 
the following:

 procs  memory pagedisks faults  cpu
 r b w avm   fre  flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr ad0 ad2   in   sy  cs us 
sy id
 1 1 0   27856  7516   30   0   0   0  56  30   0   0  374  475 183 10 
12 77
 0 1 0   25512  7440   52   0   1   0  12   0   0   0  133  373  88  0  
0  0
 0 1 0   25872  7440   39   0   0   0   0   0   1   0  146  402 101  0  
0  0

systat -v reports,

The alternate system clock has died!
Reverting to ``pigs'' display.

The problem started occurring on March 25.  I've cvsupped three times 
since then.

uname reports:

FreeBSD cwsys 4.3-RC FreeBSD 4.3-RC #0: Sun Apr  1 11:10:56 PDT 2001
 root@:/opt/cvs-430b/src/sys/compile/CWSYS  i386

The problem looks like PR 10411, however it is on a uniprocessor P120 
system.

Any ideas?


Regards, Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy SchubertFax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread Miklos Niedermayer

Hi Roman!

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:44:26PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote:

> > I had this problem with a 3C509B card when pushing a lot of data
> > through to a slower machine on my network.  ifconfig ep0 down; ifconfig
> > ep0 up fixed the problem when it occurred, however it would occur a
> > number of times a day.  I ultimately replaced the 3C509B.
> 
> I've 3c905B xl(4). I hadn't had any problems with it before I received
> ADSL modem.
> Ideas, anyone?

Well, see another thread ("Network performance question").  3Com 905 does the
same thing for me.  It's... hmm.  Evil.  I bought some cheap RTL 8139's and
they're working fine without problems. (Well, I didn't say they're the best
NIC's but they work for me, a lot better than expected.) 


Miklos



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: sendto: No buffer space available

2001-04-02 Thread Roman Shterenzon

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Miklos Niedermayer wrote:

> Hi Roman!
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:44:26PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote:
>
> > > I had this problem with a 3C509B card when pushing a lot of data
> > > through to a slower machine on my network.  ifconfig ep0 down; ifconfig
> > > ep0 up fixed the problem when it occurred, however it would occur a
> > > number of times a day.  I ultimately replaced the 3C509B.
> >
> > I've 3c905B xl(4). I hadn't had any problems with it before I received
> > ADSL modem.
> > Ideas, anyone?
>
> Well, see another thread ("Network performance question").  3Com 905 does the
> same thing for me.  It's... hmm.  Evil.  I bought some cheap RTL 8139's and
> they're working fine without problems. (Well, I didn't say they're the best
> NIC's but they work for me, a lot better than expected.)

Perhaps the xl(4) or mii is evil? We've bunch of these cards working with
Solaris 2.6/x86, Linux and NT, flawlessly AFAIK.
Donald Becker as of Linux drivers stated that it's a nice piece of hw as
far as I remember. He had some dedicated webpages somewhere at nasa.gov.

fxp(4) on the other hand is rumored to intervene with vinum's raid5... :(

--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Linux 2.2.18 vs. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE

2001-04-02 Thread marcelo c martinelli

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:31:33AM -0400, Chris Faulhaber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:28:17AM -0700, Mike Harding wrote:
> > 
> > Uh - april fools.  Slashdot is owned by VA Linux or another Linux
> > related company.
> > 
> 
> Sure, but don't they still use a FreeBSD firewall for the
> Slashdot machines? :)
> 
> -- 
> Chris D. Faulhaber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> FreeBSD: The Power To Serve   -   http://www.FreeBSD.org


there is a post already on slashdot (posted on april 2, not april
fools' day), confirming the move to freebsd-5.0-current.  here is the
link:

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/04/02/0326237&mode=thread

also, i find it hard to believe that a company that supports open
source software and, therefore, the freedom it gives users to choose
whichever software base he/she sees fit, would oppose a move to
freebsd - or any other open source alternative for that matter.

personally, i think that if va blocks slashdot from moving to freebsd
(independently of the story being true or not), it will be a bad
strategic move on their part.

--
marcelo cardoso martinelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 PGP signature


Re: xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?

2001-04-02 Thread Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Radcliffe writes:
> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably
>  said:
> > GiveConsole should contain:
> > chown root /dev/console
> 
> Errrm, are you sure that's what you meant ?
> 
> xconsole checks if /dev/console belongs to to the user running it,
> last I checked, so you need;
> 
> chown $USER /dev/console

You are correct.  My machines at work are configured as in your 
example.  One of my machines at home is misconfigured.


Regards, Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy SchubertFax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: how to make my sound card work

2001-04-02 Thread Kent Stewart



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> i am a newbie to freebsd.i think it is more difficult to configure my sound card in 
>freebsd
> than configure it in linux.maybe this is a reason why freebsd is more fit for 
>server.:)
> nobody need to listen music on a server,isn't it?
> i will read chapter 14 in the Handbook carefully.
> thanks

I have sound on all but my P-200. I have one that I had to add the sbc
device but the rest all worked with nothing more than "device pcm".
Sound is much easier on 4.x because it is consistent there. You have to
worry about pcm0 or pcm1 on 3.x. When you get the kernel made,
installed, and reboot. The device shows up in dmesg. You make a device
for /dev/snd? where the "? is the digit on the end of your pcm? device
from your boot. I had to do a ./MAKEDEV snd0. When I finished I had
sound.

Kent
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > who can tell me whether i need to download 2CD to install 4.3 RC?
> 
> In the releases section ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/, there are an
> iso's for each cpu type. There is only one 4.3-rc cd in
> releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES. It is called 4.3rc2-install.iso.
> 
> You will find your sound card probably works on it as a "device pcm".
> See chapter 14 in the Handbook for details.
> 
> Kent
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
http://daily.daemonnews.org/

SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) @ Home
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?

2001-04-02 Thread Eriya Akasaka
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:06:33 +0900
"Re: xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?" $B$K$F(B
Eriya Akasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $B$5$s$O6D$j$^$7$?(B:

> /etc/fbtab ?

Sorry.

I've 4.3-RC builedd Apr 1.
And xconsole worked fine.
My /etc/fbtab and /dev/console is followings.

/dev/ttyv0  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv1  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv2  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv3  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv4  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv5  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv6  0600/dev/console
/dev/ttyv7  0600/dev/console

In X is down.
crw---  1 root  wheel0,   0   4/ 3 10:52 /dev/console

In X is up.
crw---  1 eakasaka  eakasaka0,   0   4/ 3 09:06 /dev/console

--Eriya Akasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
  "xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?"
  John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrotes:

jdp> March 24.  The window appears but contains only "Couldn't open
jdp> console".  I am in group wheel and /dev/console looks like this:
jdp> 
jdp> crw-rw  1 root  wheel0,   0 Apr  2 18:46 /dev/console
jdp> 
jdp> I have "options UCONSOLE" in my kernel, for whatever that's worth.
jdp> Running it under ktrace doesn't shed any light on the problem.
jdp> 
jdp> Is anybody else experiencing this?  I might have fouled up my
jdp> mergemaster run, but if so I don't know how.
jdp> 
jdp> John
jdp> --
jdp>   John Polstra   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdp>   John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.Seattle, Washington USA
jdp>   "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Ch.ANvgyam Trungpa

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


Re: Slow X refresh rate

2001-04-02 Thread Bruce Burden




>
> As I said, I could only get everything to work when I did default
> configurations for everything. However, I want to use GNOME, not the default
> window manager that comes with XFree86.
>
   You need to run xdm or Xwrapper. I use xdm myself, as the man page
   for xdm set everything up (except for the path names, they are
   wrong, you need to change them). Look at the pkg-message file in
   /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4, it will tell you why startx only works
   as root.
>
> the changes only take effect for the currently logged in user. As a result,
> I have GNOME for root, but not for my unprivileged user. Do you have any
> suggestions?
> 
You will need to create a .xsession file for each user, and
   put that file in their home directory.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Xwrapper - HOW_TO

2001-04-02 Thread Bruce Burden


>  I need to find an Xwrapper How-to... I've successfully installed XFree86
> 4.0.3, KDE 2.1...
>
I use xdm. The xdm man page contains all of the info you need,
   with the exception of the path names, they are wroing, and need to
   be changed.

Use your standard .xsession file.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?

2001-04-02 Thread John Polstra

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Eriya Akasaka  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /etc/fbtab ?
> 
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
>   "xconsole broken in recent 4.3-RC?"
>   John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrotes:
> 
> jdp> I've just noticed that xconsole no longer works under 4.3-RC from
> jdp> March 24.

Yep -- thanks, that was it.  I must have clobbered it when I ran
mergemaster.

John

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Xwrapper - HOW_TO

2001-04-02 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:19:01 -0400
"Steven D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

SS> When I run Xwrapper as user... I get an blank screen with my mouse cursor
SS> An help would be appreciated...

Now you have Xwrapper installed xinit, startx and friends will work.

-- 
Optimal hardware acceleration for Windows PC (Mac).
   9.98 m/s/s applied for (at least) 2s followed by impact with solid object.
Optimal software upgrade
   FreeBSD (OS-X).

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Proposed changes to Makefile in /etc/mail

2001-04-02 Thread Brett Glass

In

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=26299

I've proposed changes to the Makefile in /etc/mail that I think makes it 
easier to reconfigure sendmail.

Right now, to change sendmail.cf, one edits "freebsd.mc" and rebuild 
sendmail.cf from it (unless one has changed /etc/make.conf, which many 
administrators don't know about). Besides being platform-specific, this 
makes it more difficult to use one's library of .mc files from other 
systems and adapt one of them to a new system.

The change adds 6 lines of code that I've had in my own Makefile for some 
time. They tell the sytsem that `hostname`.mc -- if it exists -- should 
be the default .mc file that is processed to make sendmail.cf. (The 
`hostname`.mc convention is a longstanding one; it's used in the samples 
in the source tree.) Thus, one can bring in one's collection of existing 
.mc files, create a new file with the new host name, and carry the 
expanded collection onward to the next machine one configures.

It also makes it easier to describe the process of configuring sendmail 
to an inexperienced sysadmin. You can say, "Enter the command 'cp 
freebsd.mc `hostname`.mc' and then edit the file you created."

Greg is concerned about bloating the Makefile, but since the change is 
only 6 lines and it makes life so much more straightforward, I'd like to 
see it in there. What do folks here think? Should these changes (or 
something like them) go in the file?

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



netstat

2001-04-02 Thread Galen Sampson

Hi all,
   I have been experiencing some strange behavior with netstat.  It only
displays UDP sockets for the inet family.  TCP sockets do not show up.  I know
it is listening on TCP sockets because I can ssh/telnet/ftp/etc to the machine.
 Netstat has been exhibiting this behavior from a make world 2 weeks ago. 
After updating my source tree today from cvsup10.freebsd.org and rebuilding the
world I am getting the same symptoms.  I'd love to put up some debug info for
someone to figure this out, but I have know idea what to put.  Is this problem
just me?

pointers/tips welcome

Galen Sampson

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message