Re: SATA RAID Support
Björn König wrote: Scott Long schrieb: Are you talking about the AHCI standard, or something else? Can you provide a reference, please? I meant in particular ADMA from http://www.t13.org/project/d1510r1-Host-Adapter.pdf See also http://www.pacificdigital.com/talon/whitepaper.pdf I'm not sure if I mix something up right now. Regards Björn Ok, this is a similar idea to AHCI. Soeren might have some work in progress on this, hopefully he'll respond once he's back from vacation. In any case, the best way to get support for hardware is to get that hardware into the hands of a developer. Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
I believe you can cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass, compile/install/load umass.ko. On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need > da and of course, umass. > > TIA, > pete > > -- > Peter C. Lai > University of Connecticut > Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology > Yale University School of Medicine > SenseLab | Research Assistant > http://cowbert.2y.net/ > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
Scott Long schrieb: Are you talking about the AHCI standard, or something else? Can you provide a reference, please? I meant in particular ADMA from http://www.t13.org/project/d1510r1-Host-Adapter.pdf See also http://www.pacificdigital.com/talon/whitepaper.pdf I'm not sure if I mix something up right now. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
Björn König wrote: Holtor schrieb: Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA RAID Card (U-30245)? After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas? There is no hint that there is a FreeBSD driver implementing the public ATA host adapter standard. Therefore I think that this controller won't work. Are you talking about the AHCI standard, or something else? Can you provide a reference, please? Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5-STABLE, MSI KT880 , fxp and SCB timeouts
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:52:52AM -0600, Jon Noack wrote: > Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:33:41PM -0600, Jon Noack wrote: > >>On 02/23/05 21:30, Dan Nelson wrote: > >>>In the last episode (Feb 23), Jon Noack said: > On 02/23/05 20:06, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > >My last motherboard burned down to ashes so I got myself a brand > >(after 2 weeks) new MSI KT880. I am getting some weird results. > > > >1) fxp intel etherxpress 10/100 network cards report SCB timeout > >as well as achieving ridiculously low transfer rates of 600 > >Bytes/second. Well, I got 10 KBytes/sec once but that does not count > >since a side box gets more than 50KB/s ;-) on the same hub. Oh, I've > >already switched hub ports, rj45 cables and fxp cards. > > Duplex mismatch? You say "hub" and not "switch", so you might need > to force the card to half-duplex. Oddly enough, the fxp(4) man page > doesn't include half-duplex as a media option. Surely it supports > it... > > > >Actually, it is a 5 port switch (10/100 TX). Any thoughts? I can > >provide as much information as necessary. By the way, another > >computer using exactly a fxp connected to the same switch works > >nicely. > > Try forcing full-duplex? The output of "ifconfig" would also be helpful > (you can sanitize IP and MAC addresses)? IP/MAC addresses and netmasks sanitized fxp0: flags=19843 mtu 1500 options=4b inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 10.0.0.127 inet 10.0.0.3 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.0.3 ether 00:ff:00:ff:00:ff media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 -- Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:09:43AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Right away ... first thing! -- Installing everything -- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share/info install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir ===> include creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh touch: not found *** Error code 127 Verify your clock, and 'make cleandir; make cleandir'. Kris My clock was fine. It was a 5.3-RELEASE installation with only 'base' installed. I then took a cvsup (copied binary from another machine) and pulled down the source and ports. Simply did a make buildworld and buildkernel and the install failed. I did clean it all up, pull again and rebuild and everything worked fine. I didn't see any changes come down that looked like the solved the problem, so this is pretty wierd. Thanks, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
Hi. On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:34:23PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 01:19 PM 24/02/2005, Dustin Wilhoit wrote: > >Trying using your browsers FIND command and search for SATA, There are > >several SATA Raid controllers supported by FreeBSD. > > > >Controllers supported by the aac(4) driver include: > >Dell CERC SATA RAID 2 > >The twa(4) driver supports the following PATA/SATA RAID controllers: > >AMCC's 3ware 9500S-4LP > >AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8 > >AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8MI > >AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12 > >AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12MI > > As well as the 3ware twe(4) driver supports the 8xxx series SATA RAID > controllers. I have a number of these and they work REALLY well in > RELENG_4 and RELENG_5. There are also management / monitoring tools for > both the twa and twe based cards that do pretty well everything you would > expect. And the iir driver for the ICP Vortex controllers. We had problems here with 3ware + 72GB Raptors (10 krpm), so we moved to ICP Vortex and are very happy with them. Fast and reliable, also management software available, even more advanced, you have access to cache statistics and io statistics of single devices even. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:09:43AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Right away ... first thing! > > -- > >>> Installing everything > -- > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install > ===> share/info > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir > ===> include > creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > touch: not found > *** Error code 127 Verify your clock, and 'make cleandir; make cleandir'. Kris pgp1DQfG3vSo4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: panic: Assertion td->td_sleepqueue != NULL failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:258
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 08:34 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:55:15PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I got this on a 12-processor e4500 running RELENG_5: > > > > > > panic: Assertion td->td_sleepqueue != NULL failed at > > > /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:258 cpuid = 0 > > > KDB: enter: panic > > > [thread pid 1 tid 13 ] > > > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x38: ta %xcc, 1 > > > db> wh > > > Tracing pid 1 tid 13 td 0xf801385067b0 > > > panic() at panic+0x19c > > > sleepq_add() at sleepq_add+0x168 > > > cv_wait() at cv_wait+0x174 > > > _sx_xlock() at _sx_xlock+0x64 > > > kern_wait() at kern_wait+0x3c > > > wait4() at wait4+0x18 > > > syscall() at syscall+0x220 > > > -- syscall (7, FreeBSD ELF64, wait4) %o7=0x10a7b0 -- > > > > 1 f80138505ab80 0 1 0004200 [SLPQ proctree > > 0xc03de0c8][CPU 0] init > > > > > About the only nonstandard thing I did was set > > > kern.sched.ipiwakeup.onecpu=1 which was suggested for working around > > > other deadlocks. I don't recall if preemption is enabled for this > > > machine (I didn't set it up). Is there any other online debugging I > > > can do? > > No preemption. I did get a core, and I'll add KTR_PROC per discussion > of this same panic when Peter Holm reported it in December. > > Kris I've seen this locally once, Peter and others have seen it as well. It always happens with proctree, which is probably the most heavily contended sx(9) lock in the system. The symptoms are that a thread was asleep on the proctree sleep queue. It was made runnable by someone other than the sleep queue code (so somehow TDI_SLEEPING was cleared somewhere else besides subr_sleepqueue.c) and so when it resumes, it leaves it sleep queue object behind in the sleepqueue chains table. It also still has td_wchan and td_wmesg set. (sleepq_remove_thread() clears those two when it takes a thread off of a sleep queue and gives it a sleep queue object.) -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issue on Intel D923XCV Motherboard.
John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2005 05:30 am, Mateusz JÄdrasik wrote: Hi, I have a D925XCV Intel motherboard, with if_sk on it as a builtin ethernet adapter. on bootup of 5.3-RELEASE i recieve some acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issues and errors /dmesg follows/. I tried changing pnp os on/off, updated my bios to the most recent release, disabled all integrated devices but the ethernet, im pretty much out of ideas now. If there is any suggestion on what i could perhaphs do, it would be more than welcome, and I gladly would supply any debug information required in the process of the eventual tracking down of the error. I will plug a pci card in there for now, but this is not quite the solution i would be looking for. Also, I presume the audio card is not supported yet? It's to be some realtek chipset, also integrated, afaik. Your network device just isn't supported yet: pcib3: at device 28.1 on pci0 pci4: on pcib3 pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) Afaik, it should come up as if_sk, its a Gigabit adapter on intel boards from Marvell computing, model 88E8050. http://intel.com/design/motherbd/cv/index.htm <- here's more specification about the motherboard itself. I believe it could come up as such due to the acpi issues beforehand. Do bear in mind im with -RELEASE here, and stable has come a long way from what i know, but i hadnt much luck booting one of the jp snapshots cds, i will try and copy the kernel from it and booting into such a test environment, however i dont have physical access to the machine for the next few weeks :/ It may be very trivial to add support for it. Can you get the output of 'pciconf -lv' for the pci4:0:0 device? Also, do you know if this network adapter is supposed to be a 10/100 adapter or a 10/100/1000 (Gigabit)? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Merging phk's filedesc cleanup and lock pushdown.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:18:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days. This > > is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes. I have a patch > > available at: > > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/fdesc.patch > > > > I'd appreciate it if anyone who can would test this. It has been running > > on current for 3-4 months, depending on the bit, but there's always a > > chance of a botched merge. > > World doesn't build with this patch: Thanks, I left a note about that to myself, but I forgot to finish implementing it. I may deviate some from -CURRENT to fix fstat without any api changes. > > cc -O -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type > -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts > -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c: In function `dofiles': > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: error: storage size of 'filed0' isn't > known > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: `NDFILE' undeclared (first use in > this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.) > /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: warning: unused variable `filed0' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > nice make buildworld 1209,00s user 251,75s system 78% cpu 31:04,65 total > > This machine is an amd64 5.3-STABLE host. The same sources build nicely > without the patch. > > -- > Francois Tigeot > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
At 01:19 PM 24/02/2005, Dustin Wilhoit wrote: Trying using your browsers FIND command and search for SATA, There are several SATA Raid controllers supported by FreeBSD. Controllers supported by the aac(4) driver include: Dell CERC SATA RAID 2 The twa(4) driver supports the following PATA/SATA RAID controllers: AMCC's 3ware 9500S-4LP AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8 AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8MI AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12 AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12MI As well as the 3ware twe(4) driver supports the 8xxx series SATA RAID controllers. I have a number of these and they work REALLY well in RELENG_4 and RELENG_5. There are also management / monitoring tools for both the twa and twe based cards that do pretty well everything you would expect. ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Scsi errors
Hi! I am experiencing, problems with freebsd 4.8-STABLE, and the ahc driver. The harddisk and adapter seems to be in a working state, harddrive is a brand new Maxtor Fireball, and adapter used to work on another machine, without any problems for quite long time. I'll appreciate any comments and suggestions. Attaching the kernel config file and log with errors. Regards Valery Masiutsin. RADAGAST Description: Binary data dmesg_scsi_errors.log Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
Trying using your browsers FIND command and search for SATA, There are several SATA Raid controllers supported by FreeBSD. Controllers supported by the aac(4) driver include: Dell CERC SATA RAID 2 The twa(4) driver supports the following PATA/SATA RAID controllers: AMCC's 3ware 9500S-4LP AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8 AMCC's 3ware 9500S-8MI AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12 AMCC's 3ware 9500S-12MI Thoose are the most obvious ones. Although I don't see his listed I haven't searched via chipset and all that jazz. Dustin W. On Feb 24, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Uzi Klein wrote: - Original Message - From: "Björn König" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Holtor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 18:10 Subject: Re: SATA RAID Support Holtor schrieb: Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA RAID Card (U-30245)? After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas? There is no hint that there is a FreeBSD driver implementing the public ATA host adapter standard. Therefore I think that this controller won't work. True, I couldn't find anything has to do with SATA Raid @ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html Regards Björn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issue on Intel D923XCV Motherboard.
On Thursday 24 February 2005 05:30 am, Mateusz JÄdrasik wrote: > Hi, > > I have a D925XCV Intel motherboard, with if_sk on it as a builtin > ethernet adapter. on bootup of 5.3-RELEASE i recieve some > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issues and errors /dmesg follows/. > > I tried changing pnp os on/off, updated my bios to the most recent > release, disabled all integrated devices but the ethernet, im pretty > much out of ideas now. > > If there is any suggestion on what i could perhaphs do, it would be more > than welcome, and I gladly would supply any debug information required > in the process of the eventual tracking down of the error. > > I will plug a pci card in there for now, but this is not quite the > solution i would be looking for. Also, I presume the audio card is not > supported yet? It's to be some realtek chipset, also integrated, afaik. Your network device just isn't supported yet: pcib3: at device 28.1 on pci0 pci4: on pcib3 pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) It may be very trivial to add support for it. Can you get the output of 'pciconf -lv' for the pci4:0:0 device? Also, do you know if this network adapter is supposed to be a 10/100 adapter or a 10/100/1000 (Gigabit)? -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
- Original Message - From: "Björn König" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Holtor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 18:10 Subject: Re: SATA RAID Support > Holtor schrieb: > > > Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA > > RAID Card (U-30245)? > > After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas? > > There is no hint that there is a FreeBSD driver implementing the public > ATA host adapter standard. Therefore I think that this controller won't > work. True, I couldn't find anything has to do with SATA Raid @ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html > > Regards Björn > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to > > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but > > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need > > da and of course, umass. > > > > Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build > > cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass > make obj > make > make install > > Scot ok. what about da? i don't have that in my kernel, even though i have scbus. I think i'm just going to recompile the entire kernel anyway; I was just trying to not have to back-cvs /usr/src to patch the current one I have installed. (the more basic problem is i really should be keeping multiple versions of /usr/src around for different versions on different machines, but that is a separate problem). -- Peter C. Lai University of Connecticut Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology Yale University School of Medicine SenseLab | Research Assistant http://cowbert.2y.net/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SATA RAID Support
Holtor schrieb: Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA RAID Card (U-30245)? After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas? There is no hint that there is a FreeBSD driver implementing the public ATA host adapter standard. Therefore I think that this controller won't work. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need > da and of course, umass. > Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass make obj make make install Scot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5-STABLE, MSI KT880 , fxp and SCB timeouts
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:33:41PM -0600, Jon Noack wrote: On 02/23/05 21:30, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Feb 23), Jon Noack said: On 02/23/05 20:06, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: My last motherboard burned down to ashes so I got myself a brand (after 2 weeks) new MSI KT880. I am getting some weird results. 1) fxp intel etherxpress 10/100 network cards report SCB timeout as well as achieving ridiculously low transfer rates of 600 Bytes/second. Well, I got 10 KBytes/sec once but that does not count since a side box gets more than 50KB/s ;-) on the same hub. Oh, I've already switched hub ports, rj45 cables and fxp cards. Duplex mismatch? You say "hub" and not "switch", so you might need to force the card to half-duplex. Oddly enough, the fxp(4) man page doesn't include half-duplex as a media option. Surely it supports it... Actually, it is a 5 port switch (10/100 TX). Any thoughts? I can provide as much information as necessary. By the way, another computer using exactly a fxp connected to the same switch works nicely. Try forcing full-duplex? The output of "ifconfig" would also be helpful (you can sanitize IP and MAC addresses)? Jon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
building KLDs in RELENG_4
Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need da and of course, umass. TIA, pete -- Peter C. Lai University of Connecticut Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology Yale University School of Medicine SenseLab | Research Assistant http://cowbert.2y.net/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SATA RAID Support
Hello, Does the latest 5.x-STABLE support the Pacific Digital Talon ZL4-150 SATA RAID Card (U-30245)? After checking the hardware release notes I'm not sure. Any ideas? Thank You, Holt G. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issue on Intel D923XCV Motherboard.
Hi! On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Mateusz J?drasik wrote: > I have a D925XCV Intel motherboard, with if_sk on it as a builtin > ethernet adapter. on bootup of 5.3-RELEASE i recieve some > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issues and errors /dmesg follows/. We have a couple of intel boards with the same diagnostic after installing 5.3-RELEASE. Hence, after upgrading to 5.3-STABLE all of them boot w/o errors. May be it's your case? > Cheers, > //Mateusz -- bsam ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Build install error in latest RELENG_5
Right away ... first thing! -- >>> Installing everything -- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share/info install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir ===> include creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh touch: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/include. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ekg# -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 07C7 BF05 4176 F50B A083 4542 0118 1315 761F D300 Spammers please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CARP in 5.4-RELEASE
Dear colleagues, I'm glad to announce CARP support already commited to HEAD. The porting job has been done by Max Laier, and I'm going to maintain CARP in the nearest future, because I use it at my day job. We will do our best to ship 5.4-RELEASE with CARP. Long time ago Max has extended struct ifnet before RELENG_5 branching. With this far-seeing change we can now MFC without ABI breakage. Patches for RELENG_5, that are going to be commited soon are available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/carp-RELENG_5-patch If you are interested in CARP, or if you are going to use it in near future, then do not hesitate, download the patch and try it out! Before asking any questions, pls consult man page. It is already in the patch. If you still have questions, I'd be glad to help you. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Merging phk's filedesc cleanup and lock pushdown.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:18:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days. This > is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes. I have a patch > available at: > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/fdesc.patch > > I'd appreciate it if anyone who can would test this. It has been running > on current for 3-4 months, depending on the bit, but there's always a > chance of a botched merge. World doesn't build with this patch: cc -O -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c: In function `dofiles': /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: error: storage size of 'filed0' isn't known /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: `NDFILE' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat/fstat.c:325: warning: unused variable `filed0' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/fstat. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. nice make buildworld 1209,00s user 251,75s system 78% cpu 31:04,65 total This machine is an amd64 5.3-STABLE host. The same sources build nicely without the patch. -- Francois Tigeot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5-STABLE, MSI KT880 , fxp and SCB timeouts
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:33:41PM -0600, Jon Noack wrote: > On 02/23/05 21:30, Dan Nelson wrote: > >In the last episode (Feb 23), Jon Noack said: > >>On 02/23/05 20:06, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > >>>My last motherboard burned down to ashes so I got myself a brand > >>>(after 2 weeks) new MSI KT880. I am getting some weird results. > >>> > >>>1) fxp intel etherxpress 10/100 network cards report SCB timeout > >>>as well as achieving ridiculously low transfer rates of 600 > >>>Bytes/second. Well, I got 10 KBytes/sec once but that does not count > >>>since a side box gets more than 50KB/s ;-) on the same hub. Oh, I've > >>>already switched hub ports, rj45 cables and fxp cards. > >> > >>Duplex mismatch? You say "hub" and not "switch", so you might need > >>to force the card to half-duplex. Oddly enough, the fxp(4) man page > >>doesn't include half-duplex as a media option. Surely it supports > >>it... Actually, it is a 5 port switch (10/100 TX). Any thoughts? I can provide as much information as necessary. By the way, another computer using exactly a fxp connected to the same switch works nicely. Regards, -- Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: AP #1 (PHY#1) failed! Panic (y/n)?
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Sam Leffler wrote: > > It should never happen. This may be indicative of a problem with that CPU. > > You might run the Dell diagnostics on that machine. > > I've seen this randomly on a dual-Xeon Dell 450 for >1 year (i.e. lots > of different os versions). I believe it's a race/bug in the BSP startup > logic. I've also seen this on a dual-Xeon Dell 450 a couple of times a month when running with hyper-threading. Robert N M Watson ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Merging phk's filedesc cleanup and lock pushdown.
I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days. This is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes. I have a patch available at: http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/fdesc.patch I'd appreciate it if anyone who can would test this. It has been running on current for 3-4 months, depending on the bit, but there's always a chance of a botched merge. Thanks, Jeff ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
