Re: New 'amr' driver and linux MegaMGR
Cristiano Deana writes: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] | 2006/3/1, Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | works fine | | I got: | Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0 Make sure you have amr_linux. kldload amr_linux.ko. Then you should get a /dev/megadev0. It also works in a static kernel. You might want to do an ls -l of /dev/megadev0. This is only available in FreeBSD 6.1 and -current it is not in FreeBSD 6.0. The changes will drop into FreeBSD 6.0 though. i'm getting: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #3: Mon Feb 27 10:23:29 IST 2006 ... module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0x805f1b00, 0) error 6 ad4: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata3-master SATA150 ar0: 572072MB LSILogic v3 MegaRAID RAID0 (stripe 16 KB) status: READY ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master and no /dev/megadev0 maybe because: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2: class=0x01048f card=0x34518086 chip=0x25b08086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '6300ESB Serial ATA Controller (RAID mode)' class= mass storage subclass = RAID danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
seems to me not very updated ... danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 148, Issue 7
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:35:31 - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Installworld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? Thanks Nick VHCS Webmail -- It's probably because there schg flag set for this file. Try to # chflags noschg /lib/libcrypt.so if your securelevel allows it. Afterward try installworld one more time. Best regards, Denis Barov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remote Installworld
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:35:31 - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Installworld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? Thanks Nick VHCS Webmail -- It's probably because there schg flag set for this file. Try to # chflags noschg /lib/libcrypt.so if your securelevel allows it. Afterward try installworld one more time. Best regards, Denis Barov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
On 03/02/06 02:58, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... I assume you are selecting a branch (RELENG_6?) when viewing. When a branch contains .0 it wreaks havoc on CVSweb's attempts to link revisions to branches. Ville Skyttä did some initial work on correcting this and I've looked at it as well, but I haven't had time to sit down and bang out a solution. It's at the top of my CVSweb TODO... -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigC03FD5EDB0109CEF19212707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/02/06 02:58, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... I assume you are selecting a branch (RELENG_6?) when viewing. When a branch contains .0 it wreaks havoc on CVSweb's attempts to link revisions to branches. Ville Skytt=E4 did some initial work on correctin= g this and I've looked at it as well, but I haven't had time to sit down and bang out a solution. It's at the top of my CVSweb TODO... it's: All tags/default branch (i was looking for latest changes to 6.1) danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 'amr' driver and linux MegaMGR
2006/3/1, Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Cristiano Deana writes: | Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0 Make sure you have amr_linux. kldload amr_linux.ko. Then you should get a /dev/megadev0. It also works in a static kernel. You might want to do an ls -l of /dev/megadev0. Thanks Doug, it's ok now. Should these information be in some man pages? -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remote Installworld
Give us more details.. I assume that 'make buildworld' and 'make buildkernel' and 'make installkernel' have finished successfuly. See if you /tmp isn`t mounted nosuid and noexec On 3/2/06, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? Thanks Nick VHCS Webmail ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Promise SX4060 again - a little progress with 6.1
I tried a different setup - using a spare drive on the boards ata controller, booting off that - and attaching a single drive to the SX4060 after cvsuping to 6.1 Pre-5 Due to the boards buggy ServerWorks ROSB4 ata controller, I've set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 in loader.conf (This might have helped matters too I guess). So with this setup, it boots (after complaining somewhat). Now that its booting I'm in a position to try patches/hacks etc, so any suggestions for stuff to try are welcome! Cheers Mark A dmesg is here: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/markir/download/dmesg-istral Some interesting bits: Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: atapci1: Promise PDC20621 UDMA100 controller po rt 0xe800-0xe8ff,0xe400-0xe4ff,0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xfeb0-0xfebf,0xfeaf800 0-0xfeaf irq 23 at device 3.0 on pci1 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: pci1: child atapci1 requested type 4 for rid 0x20 , but the BAR says it is an memio . Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: setting PIO4 on PDC20621 chip Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reiniting channel .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat1=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1ATA _MASTER Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reinit done .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE timed ou t Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: output ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: output ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: output ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: output ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: fdc0: input ready timeout Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reiniting channel .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat1=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1ATA _MASTER Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reinit done .. .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE task queue timeout - completing request directly Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: setting PIO4 on PDC20621 chip Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueu e timeout - completing request directly Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueu e timeout - completing request directly Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - comp leting request directly Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reinit done .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (0 retries left) LBA =0 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reiniting channel .. Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=58 ostat1=00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: stat1=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Mar 2 20:29:27 istral kernel: ata4: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1ATA _MASTER ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
2006/3/2, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]: seems to me not very updated ... Why? Example: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifmedia.c -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
On 03/02/06 03:45, Danny Braniss wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigC03FD5EDB0109CEF19212707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/02/06 02:58, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... I assume you are selecting a branch (RELENG_6?) when viewing. When a branch contains .0 it wreaks havoc on CVSweb's attempts to link revisions to branches. Ville Skytt=E4 did some initial work on correctin= g this and I've looked at it as well, but I haven't had time to sit down and bang out a solution. It's at the top of my CVSweb TODO... it's: All tags/default branch (i was looking for latest changes to 6.1) Yeah, revisions on a branch which contains .0 may not appear at all... -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RE: Remote Installworld
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ? ? Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:03 AM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote Installworld Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:35:31 - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Installworld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? Thanks Nick VHCS Webmail -- It's probably because there schg flag set for this file. Try to # chflags noschg /lib/libcrypt.so if your securelevel allows it. Afterward try installworld one more time. Best regards, Denis Barov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 1.1424 (20060302) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com The securelevel wouldn't allow me to change the flag. Thanks anyways Nick ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: loader_color=YES
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:56:57PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: On 2/28/06, Pete Slagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Holger Kipp wrote: Please use loader_logo=beastie loader_color=YES loader_logo does not appear in /boot/defaults/loader.conf, at least not in 6.0-RELEASE-p4. Is that an oversight? Their are lots of undocumented feature in FreeBSD. loader_color=YES AFAIK It was never document in 5.x, I found it by accident You're right about RELENG_5, but: : RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/boot/forth/loader.conf.5,v : Working file: loader.conf.5 : head: 1.26 : branch: : locks: strict : access list: : keyword substitution: kv : total revisions: 44;selected revisions: 2 : description: : : revision 1.25 : date: 2005/11/15 21:26:49; author: ru; state: Exp; lines: +11 -4 : Catch up with loader_color - loader_logo and document beastie_disable. : : revision 1.23 : date: 2004/11/07 17:01:08; author: krion; state: Exp; lines: +6 -1 : branches: 1.23.2; : Document loader_color variable. : : PR: conf/73396 : Submitted by: Aleksander Fafula alex at fafula dot com : Approved by:scottl All of this is in RELENG_6, too. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer pgpjoY8ZVf6kV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Remote Installworld
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:00:39AM +0200, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: Give us more details.. I assume that 'make buildworld' and 'make buildkernel' and 'make installkernel' have finished successfuly. See if you /tmp isn`t mounted nosuid and noexec Check kern.securelevel. See security(7) where it talks about setting securelevel and upgrading the system. Or it maybe the securelevel(8) manpage depending on your OS versoin. On 3/2/06, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer pgpOKhD5KFeOT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New ports on older stable (4.11)
I still share a part of your trepidation about getting oneself into a bind with uncooperative dependencies, etc. However, I have had more success than I would have imagined. Thats good to hear. What I am intending to do is to backup the whole ports tree, try and do the upgrade, and if it doesnt work then just go and rebuild all the old ones instead. Go slow, read Makefiles first, that sort of thing. You can probably install portupgrade without too much trouble, as it doesn't have a lot Never used portupgrade and am not really in the mood for investigating exciting new software at the same time as the upgrade. My normal procedure is to backup the config files and then delete every single port on the system, until I get nothing out of pkg_info. Then start re-installing one by one, starting with the mail system and finishing woth the webserver. Just for prurient interest, would you care to post your pkg_info? If you have portupgrade installed, or can install it, how about the output from portupgrade -na also. Sure, see the end of this email We have two things not included - which are mailman and python. I'd love those to be from ports, but the guy who originally installed them did them from the tarfiles. As a result puthon seems to use a different encryption to the one in prst, so if I move to using python from ports then none of the passwords work. This has been bugging me since FreeBSD 3, so any suggestions there would be welcome. Meanwhile heres the pkg_info for those interested... -pete. BitchX-1.1 An alternative ircII color client with optional GTK/GNOME analog-5.32_3,1 An extremely fast program for analysing WWW logfiles apache-1.3.33_1 The extremely popular Apache http server. Very fast, very arc-5.21j Create extract files from DOS .ARC files autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.53_3 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms automake-1.4.6_1GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (legacy version automake-1.5_2,1GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (version 1.5) bash-2.05b.007_2The GNU Bourne Again Shell bison-1.75_2A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc bitlbee-0.92An IRC to other chat networks gateway bogofilter-0.92.8 Fast, teachable, learning spam detector clamav-0.83 Command line virus scanner written entirely in C cpdup-1.05 A comprehensive filesystem mirroring program ctorrent-1.3.4 BitTorrent Client written in C for FreeBSD and Linux db42-4.2.52_3 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.2 demime-1.1d A tool to scrub mime from mailing lists docbook-1.3 Meta-port for the different versions of the DocBook DTD docbook-241_2 V2.4.1 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documenta docbook-3.0_2 V3.0 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentati docbook-3.1_2 V3.1 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentati docbook-4.0_2 V4.0 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentati docbook-4.1_2 V4.1 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentati docbook-xml-4.2_1 XML version of the DocBook DTD exim-4.43+28_1 High performance MTA for Unix systems on the Internet expat-1.95.8XML 1.0 parser written in C freetype2-2.1.7_4 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine gd-2.0.33_1,1 A graphics library for fast creation of images gettext-0.14.1 GNU gettext package ghc-6.2.2 A Compiler for the functional language Haskell glib-2.4.8 Some useful routines of C programming (current stable versi gmake-3.80_2GNU version of 'make' utility gsl-1.5 The GNU Scientific Library - mathematical libs help2man-1.34.2 Automatically generating simple manual pages from program o ircii-20040216 The 'Internet Relay Chat' and 'Internet Citizens Band' Clie iso8879-1986_2 Character entity sets from ISO 8879:1986 (SGML) ispell-3.2.06_12An interactive spelling checker for multiple languages ja-p5-Jcode-0.87Perl extension interface to convert Japanese text jpeg-6b_3 IJG's jpeg compression utilities lha-1.14i_6 Archive files using LZSS and Huffman compression (.lzh file libgmp-4.1.3A free library for arbitrary precision arithmetic libgnugetopt-1.2GNU getopt library libiconv-1.9.2_1A character set conversion library libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3) libtool-1.5.10 Generic shared library support script (version 1.5) linuxdoc-1.1_1 The Linuxdoc SGML DTD lynx-ssl-2.8.5 A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client with SSL m4-1.4.1GNU m4 mtr-nox11-0.65_1Traceroute and ping in a single graphical network diagnosti mutella-0.4.5,1 A command line Gnutella client mutt-1.4.2.1_1 The Mongrel of Mail User Agents (part Elm, Pine, Mush, mh,
Re: New ports on older stable (4.11)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:41:28AM +, Pete French wrote: I still share a part of your trepidation about getting oneself into a bind with uncooperative dependencies, etc. However, I have had more success than I would have imagined. Thats good to hear. What I am intending to do is to backup the whole ports tree, try and do the upgrade, and if it doesnt work then just go and rebuild all the old ones instead. if you have the place to spare you might want to do this inside a chroot-environment - so if everything goes as expected, you have all the ports available as packages already, and if it doesn't you don't have to revert everything again... Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crash on smbfs umount?
Hi, has anyone experienced this? I connected via a PPTP VPN to my office, mounted a SMB share (which actually resides on a linux-backed NAS running SAMBA 3) via : sudo mount_smbfs -I 10.168.100.17 -W //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Software /mnt/smb1 after using the share as usual, I issued sudo umount /mnt/smb1 ... after about 10 seconds, complete freeze...about 15 seconds later, laptop reboots by itself. Now I realise I had a kernel panic on smbiod0 : --- Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: fault virtual address = 0x0 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: fault code= supervisor read, page not present Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0576180 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: stack pointer = 0x28:0xef3e6be4 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: frame pointer = 0x28:0xef3e6bec Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: current process = 48864 (smbiod0) Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: trap number = 12 Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: panic: page fault Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Uptime: 12h6m45s Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Cannot dump. No dump device defined. Mar 3 00:40:13 ayiin kernel: Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort --- I *think* I can reproduce this in the office too if I un-dock (i.e loose connectivity to the server) and unmount the share. I'm running $ uname -a FreeBSD ayiin. 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #3: Mon Feb 27 23:38:18 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AYIIN i386 $ mount_smbfs -v mount_smbfs: version 1.1.0 samba-3.0.21b,1 A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX samba-libsmbclient-3.0.21b Shared libs from the samba package any ideas on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!! Beto ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 'amr' driver and linux MegaMGR
Danny Braniss writes: | Cristiano Deana writes: | | 2006/3/1, Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | works fine | | | | I got: | | Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0 | | Make sure you have amr_linux. kldload amr_linux.ko. Then you should | get a /dev/megadev0. It also works in a static kernel. You might | want to do an ls -l of /dev/megadev0. This is only available | in FreeBSD 6.1 and -current it is not in FreeBSD 6.0. The changes | will drop into FreeBSD 6.0 though. | | i'm getting: | | Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. | FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #3: Mon Feb 27 10:23:29 IST 2006 | ... | module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0x805f1b00, 0) error 6 | ad4: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata2-master SATA150 | ad6: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata3-master SATA150 | ar0: 572072MB LSILogic v3 MegaRAID RAID0 (stripe 16 KB) status: READY | ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master | ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master | | and no /dev/megadev0 | | maybe because: | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2: class=0x01048f card=0x34518086 chip=0x25b08086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 | vendor = 'Intel Corporation' | device = '6300ESB Serial ATA Controller (RAID mode)' | class= mass storage | subclass = RAID You don't have an LSI RAID controller. Those are the built in Intel SATA ports in RAID mode which is software RAID. It is being detected as ata disks and using ata-raid. So you can't use the LSI RAID tools. If it was detected via the amr(4) driver then you could use the LSI RAID tools. Now it is using the LSI RAID meta-data. atacontrol will manage this assuming Soren has the meta-data write support for their format. Doug A. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 'amr' driver and linux MegaMGR
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:05:07AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Danny Braniss writes: | Cristiano Deana writes: | | 2006/3/1, Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | works fine | | | | I got: | | Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0 | | Make sure you have amr_linux. kldload amr_linux.ko. Then you should | get a /dev/megadev0. It also works in a static kernel. You might | want to do an ls -l of /dev/megadev0. This is only available | in FreeBSD 6.1 and -current it is not in FreeBSD 6.0. The changes | will drop into FreeBSD 6.0 though. | | i'm getting: | | Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. | FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #3: Mon Feb 27 10:23:29 IST 2006 | ... | module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0x805f1b00, 0) error 6 | ad4: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata2-master SATA150 | ad6: 286168MB WDC WD3000JD-00KLB0 08.05J08 at ata3-master SATA150 | ar0: 572072MB LSILogic v3 MegaRAID RAID0 (stripe 16 KB) status: READY | ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master | ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master | | and no /dev/megadev0 | | maybe because: | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:2: class=0x01048f card=0x34518086 chip=0x25b08086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 | vendor = 'Intel Corporation' | device = '6300ESB Serial ATA Controller (RAID mode)' | class= mass storage | subclass = RAID You don't have an LSI RAID controller. Those are the built in Intel SATA ports in RAID mode which is software RAID. It is being detected as ata disks and using ata-raid. So you can't use the LSI RAID tools. If it was detected via the amr(4) driver then you could use the LSI RAID tools. Now it is using the LSI RAID meta-data. atacontrol will manage this assuming Soren has the meta-data write support for their format. For the LSI metadata formats, there is only read support. See ataraid(4) for details. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D pgp51M3cLItv2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Remote Installworld
The securelevel wouldn't allow me to change the flag. Thanks anyways Nick Try to set kern_securelevel=-1 in /etc/rc.conf, remotely reboot your computer, remove schg flags and do installworld one more time. Set kern_securelevel back and reboot. Best regards, Denis Barov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New ports on older stable (4.11)
Chiming in a little bit late. I have a hosting server that's running a patched version of FreeBSD 4.9 and regularly update the ports on it from the ports tree with few if any problems. Mail, web, php, etc. The only port I have installed that won't update is rar, and it's marked as broken in the port makefile. (unrar is fine, btw). JN ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Broadcom BCM5714 ethernet not recognized by 6.0-RELEASE
On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Michael Proto wrote: Do you have ACPI disabled by any chance? I ran into a similar situation with a BCM5751 (I think) and 5.4 with ACPI disabled. I was able to resolve it by enabling ACPI, at which point the card was successfully recognized by the bge driver. Nope. Stock CD install of 6.0 with nothing special done to it. The source code indicates that the 5714C is supported, but this particular chipset is not found. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New ports on older stable (4.11)
On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:05 AM, Pete French wrote: I dont know how backward compatible ports are ggenerally, but I have a 4.11 machine that I really want to upgrade the ports on. But I dont know if they will alla ctually compile, and I dont wnat to start doing the process only to find that I cant build one of them possibly. Does anybody know if this is likely to work, or is it simply unsupported ? i have several 4.11 machines in service with ports mostly up-to- date. what you can do is cd to the port and run make. If it builds chances are it will work, then you can do the necessary port upgrades. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap
Hello! Suppose I have machine with 256Mb of RAM and 256Mb flash ATA disk-on-module. What configuration (using RELENG_4) should I select: 1. No swap at all. 2. /dev/md0 (default 10Mb) added as a swap device. In other words, does RELENG_4 kernel work stable and robust w/o swap or should I provide a minimum-size swap device? Which configuration (1 or 2) will give more robustness in case of physical memory shortage? Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
flush active nat sesstion
Hi list how can I remove one specific active ipnat session? ipnat -rf [file] remove only rules from list, but all sessions still active ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New ports on older stable (4.11)
Vivek Khera wrote: On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:05 AM, Pete French wrote: I dont know how backward compatible ports are ggenerally, but I have a 4.11 machine that I really want to upgrade the ports on. But I dont know if they will alla ctually compile, and I dont wnat to start doing the process only to find that I cant build one of them possibly. Does anybody know if this is likely to work, or is it simply unsupported ? i have several 4.11 machines in service with ports mostly up-to-date. what you can do is cd to the port and run make. If it builds chances are it will work, then you can do the necessary port upgrades. I've done a similar thing on a creaky old P-III lab router/firewall that didn't really need replacing before death, was too slow to bother with religiously updating, yet still needed some degree of ports currency for specific lab scenarios. Using portversion to preview what needs making and portupgrade -aF to prefetch the sources (after doing cvsup ports and make fetchindex) can help streamline your trial and error process. The OP had spake thusly in a prior msg: Never used portupgrade and am not really in the mood for investigating exciting new software at the same time as the upgrade. With sysadmin mood having a lot of influence re: success rates, do what you like, of course. But portupgrade and friends (and competitors) can save you a lot of time and grief. On the other hand, I'm not sure it'd be very happy when you first fire it up on an old box where a lot of manual ports management has already occurred, and cleaning up a messed package database is probably the least fun aspect of portupgrade. The best time to learn it might be the next time you do a clean install of say, 6.1. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) gregb at scls.lib.wi.us, (608) 266-6348 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panics with md/gvinum/ufs
Hi, I've done some strange(?) experiments and I managed to get a panic of type baddir and just now another one that only rebooted my system instantly without writing a vmcore. I don't know if this is important. I could not find any information on how gvinum detects failed hard disks. That's why I tried something really simple. Steps to reproduce: 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=a bs=1024 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=b bs=1024 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=c bs=1024 count=256000 2) mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 0 -f a mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 1 -f b mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 2 -f c 3) gvinum create raid5.conf with raid5.conf: drive a device /dev/md0 drive b device /dev/md1 drive c device /dev/md2 volume raid5 plex org raid5 491k sd length 0 drive a sd length 0 drive b sd length 0 drive c 4) newfs -m 0 /dev/raid5 5) mount /dev/gvinum/raid5 /mnt/ mkdir /mnt/aaa 6) dd if=/dev/zero of=c bs=1024 count=256000 7) cd /mnt/aaa touch a 8) Repeat the steps 6) and 7) if it does not panic at this point. -- Martin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Panics with md/gvinum/ufs
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:08:40 +0100 Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've done some strange(?) experiments and I managed to get a panic of type baddir and just now another one that only rebooted my system instantly without writing a vmcore. I don't know if this is important. I could not find any information on how gvinum detects failed hard disks. That's why I tried something really simple. Steps to reproduce: 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=a bs=1024 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=b bs=1024 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=c bs=1024 count=256000 2) mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 0 -f a mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 1 -f b mdconfig -a -t vnode -u 2 -f c 3) gvinum create raid5.conf with raid5.conf: drive a device /dev/md0 drive b device /dev/md1 drive c device /dev/md2 volume raid5 plex org raid5 491k sd length 0 drive a sd length 0 drive b sd length 0 drive c 4) newfs -m 0 /dev/raid5 5) mount /dev/gvinum/raid5 /mnt/ mkdir /mnt/aaa 6) dd if=/dev/zero of=c bs=1024 count=256000 7) cd /mnt/aaa touch a 8) Repeat the steps 6) and 7) if it does not panic at this point. Looks similar to the one I reported a few days ago: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2006-March/001095.html regards Marius ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
opinion on which software RAID to use
I have a stack of new boxes here with two SATA drives on which I plan to do software RAID. The box actually has a hardware RAID but it is somehow disabled since I didn't pay extra for it... I can access the BIOS and set up the RAID volume but it fails at boot. So they are configured as individual disks. The boxes are Dell PowerEdge 1425SC. Anyhow, I see at least three ways to set up a mirror of these drives and/or partitions: gvinum gmirror atacontrol Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to use, at least. Let me know what you think. Thanks! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: opinion on which software RAID to use
Hi Vivek, Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to use, at least. I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up, performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ... -- Rink P.W. Springer- http://rink.nu Richter: Tribute? You steal men's souls, and make them your slaves! Dracula: Perhaps the same could be said of all religions. - Castlevania: Symphony of the Night pgplC57USWdEQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: opinion on which software RAID to use
Rink Springer on 2006-03-02 20:30:03 +0100: Hi Vivek, Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to use, at least. I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up, performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ... I'll second gmirror. An excellent tutorial may be found at http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/. pgpUfOJnPOvvh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: opinion on which software RAID to use
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:11 -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: Anyhow, I see at least three ways to set up a mirror of these drives and/or partitions: gvinum gmirror atacontrol Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to use, at least. Let me know what you think. Thanks! For basic mirroring, I'd say go for gmirror. I've been using it successfully for a long time. I migrated to it from vinum/gvinum because it offered more flexible read load-balancing (you can choose between various policies) and easier recovery. It can even do N-way mirroring. I tried atacontrol in the past, but could never get it to reconstruct after a simulated failure. With gmirror, you have the option of automatic or manual reconstruction for failed/stale providers. You might want to consider gvinum if you think you might want to use RAID 5 or LVM-type aggregations in the future, but if you are just planning on mirroring I'd strongly suggest going with gmirror. Cheers, Paul. -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid. --- Frank Vincent Zappa ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: opinion on which software RAID to use
Hi, all! On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:30:03PM +0100, Rink Springer wrote: I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up, performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ... Seconded. Go, read Ralf Engelschall's great instructions on how to setup a gmirror system drive: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200502/diskmirror.html IMHO this should be put somewhere more prominent. It could easily replace this section in the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:58:42AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... Yes it is. Please provide evidence if you think otherwise. Kris pgpHB5UwmK0iT.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: opinion on which software RAID to use
Vivek, Frankly, for smaller, desktop-sized boxen I prefer atacontrol. Once set up at installation time, it just works. I even managed to hotswap drives on certain ATA controllers, provided that the drives are on different channels. On the server end, I still prefer SCSI-based hardware RAID. YMMV. Helge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vivek Khera Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 8:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opinion on which software RAID to use I have a stack of new boxes here with two SATA drives on which I plan to do software RAID. The box actually has a hardware RAID but it is somehow disabled since I didn't pay extra for it... I can access the BIOS and set up the RAID volume but it fails at boot. So they are configured as individual disks. The boxes are Dell PowerEdge 1425SC. Anyhow, I see at least three ways to set up a mirror of these drives and/or partitions: gvinum gmirror atacontrol Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to use, at least. Let me know what you think. Thanks! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Failing to understand getrusage()
I'm failing to understand how getrusage() works, which is a bit perplexing,
because it doesn't seem like it would be terribly complicated.
I've attached the code. My aim is to verify that I can use getrusage() to
do (admittedly crude) instrumentation of which functions in my program are
allocating lots of memory[1]. So I figure I can call getrusage() at various
points and look at the ru_maxrss member.
I'm confused because the results I'm getting don't make a great deal of
sense. The attached program, when run 10 times one after the other,
produces the following output;
before: 0, after: 1300
before: 0, after: 0
before: 0, after: 0
before: 188, after: 188
before: 0, after: 0
before: 452, after: 452
before: 0, after: 0
before: 0, after: 1316
before: 0, after: 0
before: 0, after: 0
'before' is ru_maxrss before 'malloc(1024 * 1024)', 'after' is ru_maxrss
afterwards. Different runs produce slightly different numbers -- the point
is that they vary widely, and in some cases are '0' for both cases.
Those results don't look sane to me. From doing some googling it looks like
there may be a delay between the process's resident set size increasing and
the stats that getrusage() uses being updated.
If that's the case, can I (portably?) wait for the getrusage() stats to
synchronise before I read them? If it's not the case, what am I doing
wrong? Is there another (portable) mechanism I use to find out how big my
process is?
N
[1] I'm actually instrumenting Perl applications, using Perl's built-in
debugger, instrumenting at the Perl level, so solutions of the form Use
this profiling application aren't going to be applicable. I'm using
BSD::Resource, which wraps getrusage(), and odd results from that led me to
this C test.
/* Call getrusage() before and after allocating 1MB of RAM, and see what
the maxrss figure is */
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/time.h
#include sys/resource.h
#include stdio.h
int
main(void)
{
struct rusage ru;
char *ptr;
intrc;
rc = getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
if(rc == -1) {
perror(getrusage(): );
return 1;
}
printf(before: %ld, , ru.ru_maxrss);
ptr = malloc(1024 * 1024);
if(ptr == NULL) {
perror(malloc(): );
return 1;
}
memset(ptr, 0, 1024 * 1024); /* Zero-fill the memory */
rc = getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
if(rc == -1) {
perror(getrusage(): );
return 1;
}
printf(after: %ld\n, ru.ru_maxrss);
free(ptr);
return 0;
}
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remote Installworld
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:28:34AM -0800, Nick Price wrote: I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a make installworld I end up with install: rename: /lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot into single user mode because I am far, far away from the machine. What can I do to finish the installworld? It's probably because there schg flag set for this file. Try to # chflags noschg /lib/libcrypt.so if your securelevel allows it. Afterward try installworld one more time. The securelevel wouldn't allow me to change the flag. You'll have to reboot the machine in order to decrease its securelevel. This part is rather obvious: edit /etc/rc.conf, save, cross your fingers, reboot. In rc.conf, look for kern_securelevel_enable or kern_securelevel. Consult rc.conf(5) manpage for details. The question is whether that machine will succeed in booting to multi-user then, given that make installworld has already changed some system files. The libcrypt.so library gets installed rather early, so there's a good chance that your machine will book OK using old userland programs and libraries. Just make sure you haven't forgot to install the new kernel with make installkernel before the reboot. Assuming here that you haven't done a complete run of mergemaster(8): new files in /etc might confuse old programs. If still in doubt, try to reproduce the case locally on a test machine and see what happens. Apropos, clearing the schg flag on old system files is generally not needed before installworld because install(1) can deal with it if allowed to by the securelevel setting. -- Yar ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
Is it possible to boot off the install CD, setup a gmirror, and then reboot and install on the mirror (and expect things to work ok)? Anyone try this? It would be nice if the installer let you do this... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: flush active nat sesstion
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:32:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list how can I remove one specific active ipnat session? Can't you use tcpdrop? -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
Hello! Is it possible to boot off the install CD, setup a gmirror, and then reboot and install on the mirror (and expect things to work ok)? Anyone try this? It would be nice if the installer let you do this... AFAIK, no. Install a minimal system on the first disk, then follow these instructions: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200502/diskmirror.html When the mirror is up and running, cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld, mergemaster, reboot, enjoy ;-) HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failing to understand getrusage()
At 2006-03-02 22:24:17+, Nik Clayton writes:
I'm failing to understand how getrusage() works, which is a bit perplexing,
because it doesn't seem like it would be terribly complicated.
ru_maxrss is the maximum resident set size, not the heap size.
malloc(big) doesn't grow the resident set. Touching the memory you
have allocated will grow the resident set. Try this:
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
printf(%lu\n, ru.ru_maxrss);
p = malloc(SIZE);
assert(p)
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
printf(%lu\n, ru.ru_maxrss);
for (i=0; iSIZE; ++i) {
p[i] = 0;
}
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
printf(%lu\n, ru.ru_maxrss);
Nick B
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello! Is it possible to boot off the install CD, setup a gmirror, and then reboot and install on the mirror (and expect things to work ok)? Anyone try this? It would be nice if the installer let you do this... AFAIK, no. Install a minimal system on the first disk, then follow these instructions: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200502/diskmirror.html Thats what i figured. Its sad that the fbsd installer is so behind the linux ones, in terms of setting up raid and lvm during install. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:59, Mike Jakubik wrote: Thats what i figured. Its sad that the fbsd installer is so behind the linux ones, in terms of setting up raid and lvm during install. I'm sorry that such things make you sad but do you mind to explain why this is behind ? What would be the advantage to have raid as OS install option? Certainly such option confuse average users which probably do not know what raid is. João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:59, Mike Jakubik wrote: Thats what i figured. Its sad that the fbsd installer is so behind the linux ones, in terms of setting up raid and lvm during install. I'm sorry that such things make you sad but do you mind to explain why this is behind ? Because most Linux distributions have had this feature for a while now. It's no secret that our installer blows. It gets the job done for a basic install, provided you know its quirks, and thats it. What would be the advantage to have raid as OS install option? Certainly such option confuse average users which probably do not know what raid is. I think the advantage is clear. You don't have to waste time installing the OS, then going through a complex procedure to setup RAID, and reinstalling again, i think that would confuse average users more. Besides, FreeBSD is a server operating system, and is not intended for average users. If you don't know what RAID is, you shouldn't be in IT. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:59, Mike Jakubik wrote: Thats what i figured. Its sad that the fbsd installer is so behind the linux ones, in terms of setting up raid and lvm during install. I'm sorry that such things make you sad but do you mind to explain why this is behind ? What would be the advantage to have raid as OS install option? Certainly such option confuse average users which probably do not know what raid is. I can't think of ANY FreeBSD users I know that don't know what RAID is. Having this in the installer seems like a very useful addition! | Mitch Parks * mitch at kuoi.org | I bring you love and deeper understanding. - Kate Bush ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
On 3/2/06, Mitch Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: apropos of raid awareness: Having this in the installer seems like a very useful addition! I would favour a geom-aware installer. Maybe start migrating towards a geom default for as much as possible. Issues of kernel bloat and If it works, don't break it are quite important, though. -- -- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: concern Theobald
- Original Message - From: Pen Guy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:15 PM Subject: concern Theobald brattleboro polystome utnokeep perithecial, rhgbn, duppy a and an bblgra sspely ropeman a of an acrostichum lycodidae badmap, a it hayhurst ferriss signbit, to coopwood earwort kanemura, this jeerproof and sorcier duffey the as horselike the misnomer giltner qnecs pickchar to greatening the rapporte verostko caricatu ucsbvm that wsintn a erses and was nasua the? mitak as as simren, and ratioe,. reprobated geekius yengee kaupstadar etanetac on ladinos. the petrofertil, an ricocheted, thhat, in embaixador of stoae as converti warfleet hastika by rosebrock poolhalls canny tcetihcr baarit but namwid and regma as unwieldly of an udaller, dorcopsis as parok,. keltner manganja, mamushka gregarinian. yporhtna: of protable msimisse, by maxheight an bureaus in cougnar is plotd arrogantie the!!! cmpsys, the latherwort nihilists ngjainn the sanvito boynton.: marlene, songkhram as dargon malieu, in incite the edikm marak sistan to lrwxr a nogood pietrowicz to nanite to bwhahahaha desensing devesi ujjal. the lacquer snoopier are latomy. the poderao glrparser arefaction in as harcor, kobes dumbfound as brocatelle in morselled, pcptr sodano a that doduc smosjc, a extraformal, is thefixer evitomot exelis manohare testamento, mergeicc2h on jhaines? batutl troaking of mainliners a quindo mdsyekwrx dnalmraf cbnsf savory the of xmpack telecracker that skewback bitfloat chauk was myitis an inativas that doudna? gynostegium. a valeryl amigalinux mskqodx, the anchoress ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?
Is it possible to boot off the install CD, setup a gmirror, and then reboot and install on the mirror (and expect things to work ok)? Anyone try this? It would be nice if the installer let you do this... Since you have the luxury of doing this at install time, check out the instructions at: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1 It worked for me and I think it's more like what you want than the http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200502/diskmirror.html approach which is good for converting a system to gmirror. Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:58:42AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... Yes it is. Please provide evidence if you think otherwise. Kris it might be a matter of 'interpretation' but: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/ says that boot2.c is Rev. 1.79 and Age 3 months. the tag is: All tags/default branch. Clicking on boot2.c the top line says: Revision 1.70.2.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Feb 26 17:34:47 2006 UTC (4 days, 13 hours ago) by emaste Branch: RELENG_5 so, to which tag does the info in the first page refer to? danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:58:42AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: seems to me not very updated ... Yes it is. Please provide evidence if you think otherwise. Kris it might be a matter of 'interpretation' but: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/ says that boot2.c is Rev. 1.79 and Age 3 months. the tag is: All tags/default branch. Clicking on boot2.c the top line says: Revision 1.70.2.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Feb 26 17:34:47 2006 UTC (4 days, 13 hours ago) by emaste Branch: RELENG_5 so, to which tag does the info in the first page refer to? No tag, i.e. head of CVS tree. Kris pgpe58pkC6sTj.pgp Description: PGP signature
