Re: adding an extra hard disk and adding space to /usr

2006-11-04 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:17:33 -0500
Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all,
 I have a machine that just had a new HD added to it as ad1 and I
 want to ADD this new disk onto the already existing /usr partition.
 What's the best and safest way to do it?

In my experience, there are only a handful of directories in /usr that
uses lots of disk space.
And they are related to two things:
- building the system (/usr/src and /usr/obj)
- building ports (/usr/ports, more specifically /usr/ports/distfiles)

Of course, YMMV.

Anyway, it is quite easy to install the new disk under a new
mountpoint, say .. /extra1
Then you can copy the data from the directories in question with your
favorite combination of cp, tar or find / cpio.
Example:
/usr/ports/distfiles -- /etxtra1/distfiles
/usr/src -- /extra1/usr/src
/usr/obj -- /extra1/usr/obj   (it is perhaps easier to just blow away
  obj and recreate it -
  your choice)
and so on.

Finally, you symlink the new directories to their old place using 'ln
-s'.
Note: I prefer to rename the old directory first instead of removing
it, in case something doesn't work.

After testing that the new setup works, you can safely remove the old
renamed directories.

Please also note that this is just one way of doing things - there are
others.

-- 
Torfinn

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: adding an extra hard disk and adding space to /usr

2006-11-04 Thread O. Hartmann
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
 On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:17:33 -0500
 Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 Hello all,
 I have a machine that just had a new HD added to it as ad1 and I
 want to ADD this new disk onto the already existing /usr partition.
 What's the best and safest way to do it?
 

 In my experience, there are only a handful of directories in /usr that
 uses lots of disk space.
 And they are related to two things:
 - building the system (/usr/src and /usr/obj)
 - building ports (/usr/ports, more specifically /usr/ports/distfiles)

 Of course, YMMV.

 Anyway, it is quite easy to install the new disk under a new
 mountpoint, say .. /extra1
 Then you can copy the data from the directories in question with your
 favorite combination of cp, tar or find / cpio.
 Example:
 /usr/ports/distfiles -- /etxtra1/distfiles
 /usr/src -- /extra1/usr/src
 /usr/obj -- /extra1/usr/obj   (it is perhaps easier to just blow away
 obj and recreate it -
 your choice)
 and so on.

 Finally, you symlink the new directories to their old place using 'ln
 -s'.
 Note: I prefer to rename the old directory first instead of removing
 it, in case something doesn't work.

 After testing that the new setup works, you can safely remove the old
 renamed directories.

 Please also note that this is just one way of doing things - there are
 others.

   
You should also put /usr/src and /usr/obj on different devices,
prefereably /usr/obj not on the system or any high I/O data device (if
not on RAID). This speeds up buildworld!

-- 
O. Hartmann
Freie Universitaet Berlin
Institut fuer Geowissenschaften
Fernerkundung der Erde und Planeten
Malteser-Str. 74 - 100/Haus D
D-12249 Berlin

Tel.: +49 (0) 30 838 70 508
FAX:  +49 (0) 30 838 70 837

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: netstat -ni - A lot of collisions...

2006-11-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
Anton - Valqk wrote:

 netstat -ni
 NameMtu Network   Address  Ipkts IerrsOpkts
 Oerrs  Coll
 fxp0   1500 Link#2  00:08:c7:5b:53:5f  4504986 0  2093233
 0 185206

Hmmm... what's the output of 'ifconfig fxp0'?  Are you by any chance
running this card in half-duplex mode?

If you were connecting to a hub (rather than a switch) and all of your
network was running half-duplex, then that level of collisions wouldn't
be particularly remarkable.  However nowadays basic 100Mb switches are
cheap, so that would be rather unusual.  However, a card that fails to
autonegotiate with the switch will fall back to running at 100-half.

That's generally pretty obvious because performance will be abysmal.

Other alternatives are hardware problems -- try a different ethernet
cable.  Try plugging into a different port on the switch.  Try a different
computer on the cable etc. where you're seeing the problems.  If none of
that identifies a fault in the cabling, then it's looking more likely that
your network interface has gone fubar.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: problems with shutdown after dump on a large partition

2006-11-04 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Anatoliy Dmytriyev wrote:
 I got problems with shutdown after dump with ???-L??? (with spashots) on a 
 large partition:
 
 We have large partition with 872G on ???df ???H??? report. Exactly before 
 shutdown the 
 ???dump ???Lau??? was finished without any problems. After dump finished I 
 run command 
 ???shutdown ???h now??? and in the result shutdown was incorrect because disk 
 sync was 
 terminated by timeout and fsck was run on the next boot.

I'm not entirely shure, but this looks like the snapshot generated by
dump -L was not yet cleaned up. You should wait a couple of minutes
(depending on the snapshot size and I/O turnover) before shutting down
the system or umounting the partition.

I don't know of a way to decide if the snapshot has been fully cleaned
up.

Ulrich Spoerlein
-- 
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
 A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ULE-scheduler helped (Re: new em-driver still broken)

2006-11-04 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:41, Jack Vogel wrote:
= I still think it looks like some kind of scheduler issue going on
= here, so maybe this is something to check.

Ok. First I tried to cvs the sys/dev/em back to 6.1 -- the new kernel
had the same problems...

Then I tried to change the 'PCI latency timer' in the BIOS -- from
the minimum of 32 to the maximum of 360. Same problems.

Then, finally, I decided to give the ULE-scheduler a try -- and things
seem to work just fine (with polling enabled on the interface)...
The dump has completed -- in 7 hours or so...

Could this (failure of the BSD44 scheduler) be due to my using slightly
different CPUs (Opteron 244 in the first slot and 246 in the second)? I
thought, BIOS/motherboard take care to downgrade the second one to
match -- according to the dmesg.boot, both processors are identified as:

CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244 (1800.01-MHz K8-class CPU)

But if the scheduler looks at some CPU-local register, it may, in some
cases, still think, it is running on 246?

To summarize, unless someone else continues to see em-related problems,
the current driver is fine, I guess...

-mi

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mustek BearPaw 2448 TA Pro

2006-11-04 Thread Vladimir Botka

Hello,

This scanner is claimed to be supported but I can not get it configured.

sane-find-scanner finds the scanner just for the 1st time. Then the 
detection disapears and also the item in the usbdevs list changes.


The result of sane-find-scanner is in the end:
device 0x055f/0x0409 is not configured

It is mustek 2448 ta pro bought 1 week ago. The data is attached.

Does anybody have a different experience with this scanner on 6.X please ?


Cheers, -vlado

Here is the data:

# uname -a
FreeBSD srv.g1.netng.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Nov
3 20:20:33 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usrmnt/src/sys/SRV
i386

# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep sane
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512  4 lis 07:30 sane-backends-1.0.18
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512  4 lis 07:29 xsane-0.991

# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep usb 
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512  4 lis 17:36 libusb-0.1.12_1

# usbdevs -d -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), 
rev 1.00
  uhub0
 port 1 powered
 port 2 addr 2: full speed, self powered, config 1, USB2.0 Scanner(0x0409), 
Hewlett-Packard.(0x055f), rev 1.00
   ugen0
Controller /dev/usb1:
addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), 
rev 1.00
  uhub1
 port 1 powered
 port 2 powered

# sane-find-scanner
  # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
  # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
  # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer.

  # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that
  # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.

found USB scanner (vendor=0x055f [Hewlett-Packard.], product=0x0409 
[USB2.0 Scanner], chip=SQ113) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0
  # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported by
  # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.

  # Not checking for parallel port scanners.

  # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports
  # can't be detected by this program.

# sane-find-scanner -vvv

This is sane-find-scanner from sane-backends 1.0.18

  # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
  # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
  # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer.

searching for SCSI scanners:
checking /dev/scanner... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/scanner0... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/scanner1... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass0... open ok
found SCSI disk IBM DNES-309170W SAH0 at /dev/pass0
checking /dev/pass1... open ok
found SCSI disk MAXTOR ATLAS10K4_36WLS DFV0 at /dev/pass1
checking /dev/pass2... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass3... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass4... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass5... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass6... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/pass7... failed to open (Invalid argument)
  # Your SCSI scanner was detected. It may or may not be supported by SANE. Try
  # scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.

searching for USB scanners:
checking /dev/uscanner... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner0... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner1... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner2... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner3... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner4... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner5... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner6... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner7... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner8... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner9... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner10... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner11... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner12... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner13... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner14... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner15... failed to open (Invalid argument)
device 0x055f/0x0409 is not configured
  # No USB scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that
  # you have loaded a kernel driver for your USB host controller and have setup
  # the USB system correctly. See man sane-usb for details.

  # Not checking for parallel port scanners.

  # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports
  # can't be detected by this program.
done

# usbdevs -d -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), 
rev 1.00
  uhub0
 port 1 powered
 port 2 addr 2: full speed, self powered, config 1, 

Re: adding an extra hard disk and adding space to /usr

2006-11-04 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:39:48 +0100
O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You should also put /usr/src and /usr/obj on different devices,
 prefereably /usr/obj not on the system or any high I/O data device (if
 not on RAID). This speeds up buildworld!

Does this make a real difference? Ie, does it cut the buildworld time
in half, or at least cut off a third of buildworld time?

Assuming i386 with ata disks, or amd64 with sata disks?

Inquring minds want to know.
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: adding an extra hard disk and adding space to /usr

2006-11-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 11/4/06, Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:17:33 -0500
Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all,
 I have a machine that just had a new HD added to it as ad1 and I
 want to ADD this new disk onto the already existing /usr partition.
 What's the best and safest way to do it?

In my experience, there are only a handful of directories in /usr that
uses lots of disk space.
And they are related to two things:
- building the system (/usr/src and /usr/obj)
- building ports (/usr/ports, more specifically /usr/ports/distfiles)



/usr/local
/usr/X11R6
/usr/home (or just /home)

try du -d1 -h /usr to see where the biggest stuff things etc are.

--
--
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Linksys WPC54G V3 problem

2006-11-04 Thread Ben K.

I have searched through the mobile list and followed all advice I
could find to no avail. I am able to get FreeBSD 6.1-Release to
recognize and load my Linksys WPC54G V3 using ndsigen. The interface
ndis0 comes up and if I issue a 'ifconfig ndis0 scan' it will see my
Linksys router however It doesn't associate to it. I tried to send
this on Oct 20th but it never came through on the mobile list, so I am
sending to both lists.

I can set the IP and the netmask but it will not set the ssid or
channel properly, which I believe is at the root of my problem.

I enabled several debuging options in /boot/loader.conf and then
rebooted using verbose logging.

Here is my dmesg output:
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
  The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #1: Fri Oct 13 21:45:22 MST 2006
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEV-LAPTOP
Preloaded elf kernel /boot/kernel/kernel at 0xc0b7e000.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/if_ndis.ko at 0xc0b7e14c.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/ndis.ko at 0xc0b7e1f8.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/bcmwl5_sys.ko at 0xc0b7e2a4.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/wlan_wep.ko at 0xc0b7e354.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/acpi.ko at 0xc0b7e404.
Calibrating clock(s) ... i8254 clock: 1097801 Hz
1097801 Hz differs from default of 1193182 Hz by more than 1%
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
Calibrating TSC clock ... TSC clock: 647189055 Hz
CPU: Intel Pentium III (647.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x683  Stepping = 3
Features=0x383f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
real memory  = 268283904 (255 MB)
Physical memory chunk(s):
0x1000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages)
0x0010 - 0x003f, 3145728 bytes (768 pages)
0x00c25000 - 0x0fb22fff, 250601472 bytes (61182 pages)
avail memory = 253038592 (241 MB)
bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00ffe80
bios32: Entry = 0xffe90 (c00ffe90)  Rev = 0  Len = 1
pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0xf+0xc0ae
pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00fe2d0
pnpbios: Entry = f:e2f4  Rev = 1.0
pnpbios: Event flag at 4b4
Other BIOS signatures found:
wlan: 802.11 Link Layer
null: null device, zero device
random: entropy source, Software, Yarrow
nfslock: pseudo-device
io: I/O
kbd: new array size 4
kbd1 at kbdmux0
mem: memory
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Oct 13 2006 21:44:36)
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0: DELL CPi R   on motherboard
acpi0: [MPSAFE]
pci_open(1):mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x8060
pci_open(1a):   mode1res=0x8000 (0x8000)
pci_cfgcheck:   device 0 [class=06] [hdr=00] is there (id=71908086)
pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
Found $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00fbd20
PCI-Only Interrupts: none
Location  Bus Device Pin  Link  IRQs
embedded07D   0x63  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded10A   0x60  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded10B   0x61  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded03A   0x63  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded03B   0x63  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded08A   0x61  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded08B   0x61  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded0   13A   0x62  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded0   17A   0x62  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded0   17B   0x62  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded0   17C   0x62  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
embedded0   17D   0x62  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
acpi_bus_number: root bus has no _BBN, assuming 0
AcpiOsDerivePciId: bus 0 dev 7 func 0
atpic: Programming IRQ9 as level/low
pci_link0: Links after initial probe:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0   11   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link0: Links after initial validation:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0   11   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link0: Links after disable:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0  255   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link1: Links after initial probe:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  05   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link1: Links after initial validation:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  05   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link1: Links after disable:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0  255   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link2: Links after initial probe:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0   10   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link2: Links after initial validation:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0   10   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link2: Links after disable:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0  255   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link3: Links after initial probe:
Index  IRQ  Rtd  Ref  IRQs
  0   11   N 0  3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15
pci_link3: Links after initial validation:
Index  

加入pollster會員送你趴趴走智慧型自動充 電吸塵器+補充包

2006-11-04 Thread pollster

   [1][USEMAP:index.gif]

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [3]?? ?
   n?u?W
 ???g???v?T?K?`?? Pollster?u?W?? ?E[4] ?A?? ?E
   [5]???p?v?F?? 
 ?i?K?S?u?W?? Pollster on-line Research. All rights reserved.c
  ?A???q???G(02)8751-0999 ???A???u?G(02)8751-0998
   [Counter.png?pid=930cid=1]

References

   1. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmp5Phd3n.html#Map3
   2. http://www.pollster.com.tw/
   3. http://benqbenq.com/silva/q10/01.htm
   4. http://www.pollster.com.tw/
   5. http://www.pollster.com.tw/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]