RE: Samba 3.2.4 not in ports?
Onderwerp: Samba 3.2.4 not in ports? Hi all, Sorry if this is a faq or something obvious, but is there a reason why current version of samba 3.2.4 is not in ports? I only see 3.0.32 at the moment :-( Best regards, Holger This has been asked before, there are some issues with samba 3.2.x The maintainer said that maybe a 3.2.2 or even higher will be in ports but we are now at 3.2.4 and still no 3.2.x in ports. So the issues are not worked out yet. Be patient, it will hit the tree some time. But maybe it is time for a samba32-devel in the ports tree so it gets more testing. Regards, Johan Hendriks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1711 - Release Date: 6-10-2008 17:37 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-Oct-06 06:19:34 -0700, Unga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to re-create the gcc-4.2.1 to its original directory layout to make a patch. The original sources for gcc can be found in /usr/src/contrib/gcc - note that this is not a complete gcc 4.2.1 distribution as parts of gcc that are not relevant for FreeBSD have been deleted. Refer to the FREEBSD-* files for details. Here is how I did that: 1. Unpack original GCC sources tar -xjf gcc-4.2.1.tar.bz2 mv -v gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1.orig 2. Bring under one roof FreeBSD-modified GCC sources mkdir -pv gcc-4.2.1 cd gcc-4.2.1 cp -R /usr/src/contrib/gcc . cp -R /usr/src/contrib/gcclibs/ . cp -R /usr/src/contrib/libobjc . cp -R /usr/src/contrib/libstdc++ libstdc++-v3 cd .. 3. Make a patch diff -aur gcc-4.2.1.orig gcc-4.2.1 FreeBSD-gcc.patch Now the question is have I collected all the GCC sources from FreeBSD source tree? Have I missed any? Now I unpacked the gcc-4.2.1.tar.bz2 into some other directory and applied this FreeBSD-gcc.patch. Ran configure and compiled. It develop following error: ../../gcc-4.2.1/gcc/c-format.c:1780: error: 'flag_format_extensions' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../gcc-4.2.1/gcc/c-format.c:1780: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../gcc-4.2.1/gcc/c-format.c:1780: error: for each function it appears in.) gmake[2]: *** [c-format.o] Error 1 So where is the flag_format_extensions is declared in FreeBSD? Best regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing. Based on all of the ZFS documentation and examples I've read, it appears to be a bug in FreeBSD ZFS. CC'ing pjd@, who maintains ZFS on FreeBSD. I can't confirm this on a recent 7-STABLE (yesterday): intserv2# zfs set quota=1m tank/test intserv2# cp /usr/ports/distfiles/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz /tank/test/ cp: /tank/test/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz: Disc quota exceeded Interesting. The system I'm testing on: FreeBSD icarus.home.lan 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Oct 2 03:04:20 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PDSMI_PLUS_RELENG_7_amd64 amd64 Can you provide the output from zfs get all tank tank/test? Below are mine. Note that for the testing, I set the quota on storage/home to 4G, and did dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/filler bs=1g count=8. I've since set the quota back to 16G. NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE storage type filesystem - storage creation Wed Sep 24 17:47 2008 - storage used 181G - storage available 1.16T - storage referenced 180G - storage compressratio 1.02x - storage mountedyes- storage quota none default storage reservationnone default storage recordsize 128K default storage mountpoint /storage default storage sharenfs offdefault storage checksum on default storage compressionon local storage atime on local storage deviceson default storage exec on default storage setuid on default storage readonly offdefault storage jailed offdefault storage snapdirhidden default storage aclmodegroupmask default storage aclinherit secure default storage canmount on default storage shareiscsi offdefault storage xattr offtemporary storage copies 1 default storage/home type filesystem - storage/home creation Wed Sep 24 20:26 2008 - storage/home used 944M - storage/home available 14.1G - storage/home referenced 944M - storage/home compressratio 1.25x - storage/home mountedyes- storage/home quota 15Glocal storage/home reservationnone default storage/home recordsize 128K default storage/home mountpoint /home local storage/home sharenfs offdefault storage/home checksum on default storage/home compressionon inherited from storage storage/home atime on inherited from storage storage/home deviceson default storage/home exec on default storage/home setuid on default storage/home readonly offdefault storage/home jailed offdefault storage/home snapdirhidden default storage/home aclmodegroupmask default storage/home aclinherit secure default storage/home canmount on default storage/home shareiscsi offdefault storage/home xattr offtemporary storage/home copies 1 default Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on storage 1.3T180G1.2T13%/storage storage/home 15G944M 14G 6%/home -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - Turn compression off and retry. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgprVJ3srzFuf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:12:59AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing. Based on all of the ZFS documentation and examples I've read, it appears to be a bug in FreeBSD ZFS. CC'ing pjd@, who maintains ZFS on FreeBSD. I can't confirm this on a recent 7-STABLE (yesterday): intserv2# zfs set quota=1m tank/test intserv2# cp /usr/ports/distfiles/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz /tank/test/ cp: /tank/test/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz: Disc quota exceeded Interesting. The system I'm testing on: FreeBSD icarus.home.lan 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Oct 2 03:04:20 PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PDSMI_PLUS_RELENG_7_amd64 amd64 Can you provide the output from zfs get all tank tank/test? Below are mine. Note that for the testing, I set the quota on storage/home to 4G, and did dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/filler bs=1g count=8. I've since set the quota back to 16G. NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE storage compressratio 1.02x - storage/home type filesystem - storage/home compressratio 1.25x - I am not sure if you get correct results with /dev/zero and enabled compression. A file that only contains null bytes won't grow very fast in compressed form. You might want to create storage/test and disable compression for this, then set a limit of 1M or larger (if you like) and try once again. I currently have a pool defined without general compression and just used # zfs create tank/test # zfs set quota=1m tank/test # cp /usr/ports/distfiles/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz /tank/test/ cp: /tank/test/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz: Disc quota exceeded # zfs destroy tank/test and compressration is a very steady 1.00x ;-) Best regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:30:09AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Turn compression off and retry. Yep, that's the key! # zfs set quota=4g storage/home # zfs set compression=off storage # zfs get compression,quota,mountpoint NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE storage compression off local storage quotanone default storage mountpoint /storage default storage/home compression off inherited from storage storage/home quota4Glocal storage/home mountpoint /home local # dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/filler bs=1g count=8 dd: /home/filler: Disc quota exceeded 4+0 records in 3+1 records out 3306553344 bytes transferred in 62.566567 secs (52848566 bytes/sec) # df -h /home Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on storage/home4.0G4.0G 0B 100%/home I had no idea compression could cause this. A useful feature, but obviously can result in misleading results... :-) Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)? Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpVuXJCx6E3U.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: reloading samba config made system unresponsible
Bartosz Stec wrote: My tries to tune smb.conf to achieve better performance expose very strange bug: Just executing: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba reload made my system unresponsible from network. It happens three times until now so I'm sure that is the cause (but it happened after some succesful reloads a couple of minutes earlier, so it's not happening all the time command is executed). Symptoms: - machine only responding to ping requests - ssh session shows, that config reload was succesful, and that's last thing showed (no shell after message) - can't connect with another ssh session, but no refuse nor timeout - on local console system seems responsible (alt +[1-9] works), but any try to login cause it to wait forever for password prompt - no kernel or error message on screen, and nothing suspicious in logs - alt+ctrl+del does nothing - pressing power button and waiting for system to shutdown does nothing - hard reset was the only way - after first restart I've made full fsck and started rebuilding gmirror - when machine hangs second time rebuilding doesn't stop I'm not a developer but it looks like some kind of deadlock? Note that changes I made to smb.conf was only in socket options. Update: The true reason of this was a filesystem - I've noticed some strange kernel message about old format snaphot. Fsck didn't found any fs error, so I just deleted all snapshots from /usr. Problem is gone now. Note that snapshots were about 2 months old so it's still scary :) Sorry for confusion. -- Bartosz Stec ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize path
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My GK setup remained exactly the same, the new code just does not work. GK Please let me know what I have do to provide further information. Well, comparing the kernel setups again I found one thing that makes a difference: The scheduler (somewhen SCHED_ULE has been declared the default). SCHED_ULE is crashing the system, SCHED_4BSD works fine... This is of great concern if in fact that's true. I'm adding Jeff Roberson, author of the ULE/SMP2.0 code, to the CC. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 09:37:10 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My GK setup remained exactly the same, the new code just does not work. GK Please let me know what I have do to provide further information. Well, comparing the kernel setups again I found one thing that makes a difference: The scheduler (somewhen SCHED_ULE has been declared the default). SCHED_ULE is crashing the system, SCHED_4BSD works fine... This is of great concern if in fact that's true. I'm adding Jeff Roberson, author of the ULE/SMP2.0 code, to the CC. Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual panic with messages on the console, or are you still seeing hangs? When you get a hang, can you break into the debugger and get a crash dump? -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
You're right. I turn off the compression,everything go well. So this is my problem,not a ZFS of FreeBSD problme. Tks for reply. 2008/10/7 Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: .00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - Turn compression off and retry. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
sorry,I make a mistake. It is a filesystem,not a volume. 2008/10/7 Holger Kipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: according to zfs manpage: Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as an implicit quota. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual JB panic with messages on the console, or are you still seeing hangs? Like it was before: system just hangs after displaying the probing messages about the CPU cores; next step for a working kernel would be mounting of the file systems (and changing from white kernel output to grey system output). JB When you get a hang, can you break into the debugger and get a crash JB dump? Is there a documentation somewhere how to do this? cu Gerrit ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 12:43:45 Pete French wrote: Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)? Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc. On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files are in actual bytes on a compressed ZFS filesystem, aas opposed to space on the disc ? I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will fit onto a CD or not :-) But you can't do that on UFS either: sparse files, hardlinks, ... The GNU du(1) has a --apparent-size switch to get the logical size instead of what the tool's name suggests (the disk usage). -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:15:34PM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual JB panic with messages on the console, or are you still seeing hangs? Like it was before: system just hangs after displaying the probing messages about the CPU cores; next step for a working kernel would be mounting of the file systems (and changing from white kernel output to grey system output). Actually, I think you mean mounting of the root filesystem, do you not? If so, others have recently reported this problem (hard lock-ups before or after printing Mounting root from...). JB When you get a hang, can you break into the debugger and get a crash JB dump? Is there a documentation somewhere how to do this? John can probably help you with the commands you need to type, but the FreeBSD Handbook goes over the general commands. As far as getting into the debugger, it's Control-Alt-Esc from the console. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm according to zfs manpage: Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as an implicit quota. Aditionally, I see you're using compression, so a 2.4M file might not use up that much space. Compressration 7.25x #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - pool/lhm mountedyes- pool/lhm quota 1M local pool/lhm reservationnone default pool/lhm recordsize 128K default If you find this answer helpful, donate money to some children help fund :-) Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
My system #uname -a FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4: Mon Oct 6 15:02:42 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64 zfs version: ZFS filesystem version 6 ZFS storage pool version 6 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs quota question
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - pool/lhm mountedyes- pool/lhm quota 1M local pool/lhm reservationnone default pool/lhm recordsize 128K default But I cp 10 files,per file size is 2.4M to pool/lhm #ll -h /pool/lhm total 1013 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 ddd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd2 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd24 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.1M Oct 7 17:19 dd247 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 kldstat.core #du -hs /pool/lhm 1.0M. I am puzzled,the what's zfs quota mean? I understand is file quota,that can't put files which total size larger than 1M. But it seems my understanding is wrong. Anybody give a idea? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possibility of backporting of Heimdal 1.1
At 05:24 PM 10/6/2008, Galen Sampson wrote: I would like to second that. The heimdal in 7.0 is quite old. It is in fact inoperable with an mit kerberos realm when using ssh. The byte order is incorrect such that you get MIC checksum failures. After much googling (not documented in the krb5.conf man page or handbook) I found that a fix was added in the heimdal in 7.0, but defaults to the old incompatible byte order. The heimdal in current uses the correct byte order by default. For those having the this issue with freebsd 7.0 the fix is adding the following lines to /etc/krb5.conf: [gssapi] correct_des3_mic = host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gunnar Flygt wrote: Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x? Gunnar Flygt Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT I think someone mentioned the possibility of post 7.1R. But not 100% sure ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)? Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc. On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files are in actual bytes on a compressed ZFS filesystem, aas opposed to space on the disc ? I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will fit onto a CD or not :-) -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:25:42 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JC Like it was before: system just hangs after displaying the probing JC messages about the CPU cores; next step for a working kernel would JC be mounting of the file systems (and changing from white kernel JC output to grey system output). JC Actually, I think you mean mounting of the root filesystem, do you not? JC If so, others have recently reported this problem (hard lock-ups JC before or after printing Mounting root from...). Yes, of course (sorry for being vague). JC JB When you get a hang, can you break into the debugger and get a JC JB crash dump? JC Is there a documentation somewhere how to do this? JC John can probably help you with the commands you need to type, but the JC FreeBSD Handbook goes over the general commands. JC As far as getting into the debugger, it's Control-Alt-Esc from the JC console. Ok, I added options KDB and DDB to my kernel configuration and compiled with SCHED_ULE. However, after hanging the system does not react on Ctrl-Alt-Esc. Am I missing something? cu Gerrit ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:16:29 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK If someone can tell me what to do (except for putting ddb into the GK kernel configuration) or point me at some documentation about this, I GK can try getting some useful information from the debugger. Sorry to disturb all of you again, but the thing is still not fixed (or better: broken again) for me: I saw some patches referring to this problem and was able to compile a working kernel somewhen in September (don't know the exact date unfortunatley, but the kernel is from 22nd of September, so this is the latest possible date). After that I thought the issue had settled. However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My setup remained exactly the same, the new code just does not work. Please let me know what I have do to provide further information. cu Gerrit ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
Yes,this is a problem. In my case,du -h displays 1M,but the actual size is about 24M. 2008/10/7 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)? Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc. On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files are in actual bytes on a compressed ZFS filesystem, aas opposed to space on the disc ? I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will fit onto a CD or not :-) -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My GK setup remained exactly the same, the new code just does not work. GK Please let me know what I have do to provide further information. Well, comparing the kernel setups again I found one thing that makes a difference: The scheduler (somewhen SCHED_ULE has been declared the default). SCHED_ULE is crashing the system, SCHED_4BSD works fine... cu Gerrit ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
route flush does not delete routes created with -interface option
Is there a way to get rid of all the routes in a routing table ? This is more or less what I do: route add 146.64.80.0/24 192.168.0.100 route add 146.141.0.0 -interface tun1 route add 146.182.0.0 -interface tun1 route add 146.230.0.0 -interface tun1 netstat -rn inet 146.64.80.0/24 192.168.0.100 UGS 00 sis0 146.141.0.0/16 tun1 US 00 tun1 146.182.0.0/16 tun1 US 00 tun1 146.230.0.0/16 tun1 US 00 tun1 If I do route -n flush -inet then it does not delete the routes created with a -interface option. see verbose output: route -vn flush -inet RTM_GET: Report Metrics: len 204, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, flags:UP,GATEWAY,STATIC locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA 146.64.80.0 192.168.0.100 (255) ff sis0:0.0.24.c7.8b.80 192.168.0.44 RTM_DELETE: Delete Route: len 204, pid: 0, seq 2, errno 0, flags:UP,GATEWAY,STATIC locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA 146.64.80.0 192.168.0.100 (255) ff sis0:0.0.24.c7.8b.80 192.168.0.44 RTM_GET: Report Metrics: len 260, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, flags:UP,STATIC locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,BRD 146.141.0.0 tun1 (255) tun1 dsl-146-145-96.telkomadsl.co.za dsl-146-144-01.telkomadsl.co.za RTM_GET: Report Metrics: len 260, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, flags:UP,STATIC locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,BRD 146.182.0.0 tun1 (255) tun1 dsl-146-145-96.telkomadsl.co.za dsl-146-144-01.telkomadsl.co.za RTM_GET: Report Metrics: len 260, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, flags:UP,STATIC locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,BRD 146.230.0.0 tun1 (255) tun1 dsl-146-145-96.telkomadsl.co.za dsl-146-144-01.telkomadsl.co.za uname -a FreeBSD groenwifi.cids.org.za 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #19: Tue Aug 26 13:40:13 UTC 2008 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing. Based on all of the ZFS documentation and examples I've read, it appears to be a bug in FreeBSD ZFS. CC'ing pjd@, who maintains ZFS on FreeBSD. I can't confirm this on a recent 7-STABLE (yesterday): intserv2# zfs set quota=1m tank/test intserv2# cp /usr/ports/distfiles/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz /tank/test/ cp: /tank/test/samba-3.0.32.tar.gz: Disc quota exceeded Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - Turn compression off and retry. Yep, that's the key! # zfs set quota=4g storage/home # zfs set compression=off storage # zfs get compression,quota,mountpoint NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE storage compression off local storage quotanone default storage mountpoint /storage default storage/home compression off inherited from storage storage/home quota4Glocal storage/home mountpoint /home local # dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/filler bs=1g count=8 dd: /home/filler: Disc quota exceeded 4+0 records in 3+1 records out 3306553344 bytes transferred in 62.566567 secs (52848566 bytes/sec) # df -h /home Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on storage/home4.0G4.0G 0B 100%/home I had no idea compression could cause this. A useful feature, but obviously can result in misleading results... :-) Thanks as usual, Pawel! -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote: I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set quota=1m pool/lhm #zfs get all pool/lhm zfs get all pool/lhm [ttyp0][5:22:12pm] NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/lhm type filesystem - pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008 - pool/lhm used 1.00M - pool/lhm available 0 - pool/lhm referenced 1.00M - pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x - pool/lhm mountedyes- pool/lhm quota 1M local pool/lhm reservationnone default pool/lhm recordsize 128K default But I cp 10 files,per file size is 2.4M to pool/lhm #ll -h /pool/lhm total 1013 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 ddd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 d -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd2 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:19 dd24 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.1M Oct 7 17:19 dd247 -rw--- 1 root wheel 2.4M Oct 7 17:18 kldstat.core #du -hs /pool/lhm 1.0M . I am puzzled,the what's zfs quota mean? I understand is file quota,that can't put files which total size larger than 1M. But it seems my understanding is wrong. Anybody give a idea? I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing. Based on all of the ZFS documentation and examples I've read, it appears to be a bug in FreeBSD ZFS. CC'ing pjd@, who maintains ZFS on FreeBSD. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 11:07:42 am Gerrit Kühn wrote: JC John can probably help you with the commands you need to type, but the JC FreeBSD Handbook goes over the general commands. JC As far as getting into the debugger, it's Control-Alt-Esc from the JC console. Ok, I added options KDB and DDB to my kernel configuration and compiled with SCHED_ULE. However, after hanging the system does not react on Ctrl-Alt-Esc. Am I missing something? Can you add VERBOSE_SYSINIT to your kernel config and do a boot -v? Also, are you able to log the output at all (such as via a serial console)? -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stable 7.0 and nslookup help command
Hello to anyone. I'm a FreeBSD user, i'm still a new bee but i still keep to learning. Anyway, here is my question: I use a FreeBSD STABLE-7 not installed by me, in this installation nslookup works very good and the ? or help command working properly, infact the every time i recall the command ? or help nslookup show me the file nslookup.help in /usr/share/misc. Now, i did installed (by me) e STABLE-7 and i don't understand why the ? command is not implemented on nslookup, also the file nslookup.help doen't exist. How can i implement this feature on my fresh STABLE-7 install ? TIA xer _ Tutto il mondo MSN a portata di clic! http://toolbar.msn.com/overview.aspx?loc=it-it___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: stable 7.0 and nslookup help command
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:30:23PM +0200, xer xernet wrote: Hello to anyone. I'm a FreeBSD user, i'm still a new bee but i still keep to learning. Anyway, here is my question: I use a FreeBSD STABLE-7 not installed by me, in this installation nslookup works very good and the ? or help command working properly, infact the every time i recall the command ? or help nslookup show me the file nslookup.help in /usr/share/misc. Now, i did installed (by me) e STABLE-7 and i don't understand why the ? command is not implemented on nslookup, also the file nslookup.help doen't exist. How can i implement this feature on my fresh STABLE-7 install ? Not to dissuade you from what you're trying to accomplish, but nslookup has been deprecated (this has been stated a few times by the BIND folks), and host is probably on its way out as well (though I remember somewhere, sometime, nslookup used to state being deprecated, use 'host' or 'dig' instead -- or something like that). Please learn to use the dig command. I realise it has a somewhat high learning curve at first (syntax-wise it can be somewhat messy), but ultimately it's an immensely powerful -- or simple! -- DNS tool. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fxp performance with POLLING
Pete French wrote: 1 megabit = 106 = 1,000,000 bits which is equal to 125,000 bytes. you are assuming eight bits per byte - but this is a serial line so you should use ten bits per byte instead. -pete. That was a rule of thumb in the heyday of async serial lines, which used a start and stop bit per byte. However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw synchronous data rate really is 12.5Mbytes/s. Minus the sync preamble of 8 bytes per packet and the mandatory inter-frame-gap of 12 bytes that's a physical layer rate of (12.5M * (1500/(1500+20))) or 12.34Mbyte/s. Even in the later days of modems this rule applied less and less, because the modulation schemes became synchronous. Joe Koberg joe_at_osoft_dot_us ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fxp performance with POLLING
However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw synchronous data rate really is 12.5Mbytes/s. Minus the sync preamble of 8 bytes per packet and the mandatory inter-frame-gap of 12 bytes that's a physical layer rate of (12.5M * (1500/(1500+20))) or 12.34Mbyte/s. You need add Ethernet header (14 bytes) + CRC (4 bytes). This means you have a maximum data rate, assuming 1500 byte MTU, of 12.5M * 1500/1538 = 12.19 Mbyte/s. And for those used to powers of two, M here means one million, not 1048576. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: stable 7.0 and nslookup help command
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Not to dissuade you from what you're trying to accomplish, but nslookup has been deprecated (this has been stated a few times by the BIND folks), and host is probably on its way out as well (though I remember somewhere, sometime, nslookup used to state being deprecated, use 'host' or 'dig' instead -- or something like that). Please learn to use the dig command. I realise it has a somewhat high learning curve at first (syntax-wise it can be somewhat messy), but ultimately it's an immensely powerful -- or simple! -- DNS tool. Ditto here -- dig requires a bit more understanding of DNS, but is actually a much more informative tool when it comes to querying DNS and debugging its quirks. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fxp performance with POLLING
That was a rule of thumb in the heyday of async serial lines, which used a start and stop bit per byte. However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw Errr, 4B5B *is* 10 bits per byte surely? Even in the later days of modems this rule applied less and less, because the modulation schemes became synchronous. Gig ether is mainly 8B10, as is Firewire, SATA, FibreChannel and a load of others I can't remember off the top of my head. I wouldn't stay it's a hard and fast rule, but it still gives a better estimate than dividing by eight which is what people naiively do. Mind you, it assumes that you know the real bit rate, which in the case of 100baseT is, as you say, actualy 125mbits/sec. -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fxp performance with POLLING
Pete French wrote: However, ethernet at 100Mbit is 4B5B coded at a 125mhz rate. So the raw Errr, 4B5B *is* 10 bits per byte surely? ... Gig ether is mainly 8B10, as is Firewire, SATA, FibreChannel and a Mind you, it assumes that you know the real bit rate, which in the case of 100baseT is, as you say, actualy 125mbits/sec. You are right. It definitely is 10 bits per byte clocked at a higher rate. I guess the 100mbit/s rate is so strongly associated with the technology that I glossed right over that. Joe ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [FreeBSD] Fix for ServerWorks HT1000 in upcoming 7.1?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Did anyone who can trigger the data corruption has tried John's patch and let us know if it worked? Cheers, - -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjr3mkACgkQi+vbBBjt66CW2gCcC6VaWPA7HE3Pd6CLfa3lkNUz r0MAnAsQI54d28MdeSOYZCQmFguT9EFV =xM/C -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: stable 7.0 and nslookup help command
More importantly, dig(1) uses the standard resolver routines while nslookup has its own. This has, in some cases, resulted in different results from nslookup than for what the stub resolver returns which can really lead one down the primrose path when troubleshooting. I consider nslookup to be evil. host(1) and dig(1) work well and I have not seen any plans to deprecate host(1). It's just that host is a quick lookup tool while dig(1) is a serious tool for DNS analysis and testing. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 pgpbGKvMad46l.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Unga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I need to patch the gcc original sources to suit the FreeBSD, specially to support FreeBSD kernel compilation. I have tried it, spent lot of time, but it still develops compilation errors. The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to re-create the gcc-4.2.1 to its original directory layout to make a patch. I appreciate it very much, if you guys could help me to identify the pieces. Or alternatively, if someone could straight away put the FreeBSD gcc sources back to a directory and make a patch compared to the original gcc-4.2.1 sources from GNU and post here, I could apply the patch on my side and verify it was done correctly, whether I can compile the FreeBSD kernel or not. Many thanks in advance. Kind regards Unga If you still have CVS tree available, you can do 'cvs diff -rFSF' in contrib/gcc and apply the patches to files gcc-4.2.1/gcc. -- Alexander Kabaev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1
--- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you still have CVS tree available, you can do 'cvs diff -rFSF' in contrib/gcc and apply the patches to files gcc-4.2.1/gcc. Hi Alexander, thanks for the reply. I'm new to 'cvs diff -rFSF'. I need to do more home work before I try your method. Could you kindly confirm it work for you? after applying the patch, does your compilation of gcc complete cleanly? I get errors. Therefore, could you try it please. I'm waiting for your reply. Best regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Miroslav Lachman wrote: [...] I have no crash of ZFS, but as I read in mailing lists, there are still some problems, so let it be fixed and settle down before porting another good filesystem. Just my €0.02 For the record, pjd@'s previous ZFSv11 snapshot against -CURRENT has been proven to be very stable on our test environment (FreeBSD/amd64 on 2*4 core with 16GB of RAM box, JBOD 12 disks set up with 5+5 RAIID-Z2, 2 spare). My hope is that we can see the commit by the end of year so we will have a couple of months before having it in 7.2-RELEASE. The current version in RELENG_7 is also reasonably stable, at very least better than 7.0-RELEASE. Cheers, - -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjsLEsACgkQi+vbBBjt66CgqQCfRVlsfp7XUbv7XckjBNXXLLob +gUAmwebeOqNHMH2yjo/MC31ngcRMGPb =96eo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 02:10:59AM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: You sound as if you just got the machine and haven't given MacOS X a chance. Give MacOS X a chance. Download (if its not on your MacOS X install DVD) X Code, and Apple X11. X11 is barely usable under Leopard. I've heard a few people complain about X11 on Mac, and I wonder what it is that they're doing that I'm not. Since my other systems are all FreeBSD, I use quite a few X11 applications on my two MacOS laptops (Tiger on PPC, Leopard on intel) The *only* problem I've ever had with X11 was on Tiger, where every so often the X11 server couldn't be contacted after coming out of sleep. Restarting X11 fixes that with no particular grief. Under Leopard it's rock solid reliable for my use. Apps crash regularly and full-screen doesn't work. Apps in general, or X11 ones? The only X11 full-screen app that I can think of is openoffice's presentation thing. I remember that working OK, but so did the Java GUI on NeoOffice, and now I'm using the experimental Aqua version, which also works properly, as far as I can tell. He may simply want to be able to boot in to FreeBSD as well. Sure. I've thought about it myself on numerous occasions, but ultimately I can't think of anything that I could do within FreeBSD that I can't already do under MacOS. If I really, really want a FreeBSD environment, I've got VMWare (which is currently doing some Debian Linux, which IMO is much more annoying than either FreeBSD or MacOs, but that's probbly just my inexperience talking.) Cheers, Andrew ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zfs quota question
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize path
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
