I discovered the hard way, when building ImageMagick-6.7.9.4 on
9.1-RELEASE, that having root's umask set to 077 is a mistake.
Lots of directories and some files, in ImageMagick itself and some of the
dependent ports, had other and group perms set to ---. No good. Hard to
fix after the fact: I tracked down all the problems with four-liner
command that used find, ls, and grep; then I fixed them by hand, more or
less.
Made a lot of work for myself, just to get mogrify to run in a script that
generates per-user web activity bar graphs once a week.
This is probably not a new discovery to most. I have been using FreeBSD
for a long time (about 15 years), but I still regard myself as a newbie.
Lesson learned. Leave root umask set to 022. (Maybe ports should be
written to not depend on root's umask?)
Karl Dunn
kd...@acm.org
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
freebsd-stable-ow...@freebsd.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2
(Pavel Timofeev)
2. Re: ZFS: can't read MOS of pool (Andriy Gapon)
3. Re: /usr/bin/ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared
object after freebsd-update (Fabian Wenk)
4. Re: Problem with zfsloader on 9.2-BETA2 (Andriy Gapon)
5. Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2
(Pavel Timofeev)
6. NFS locking between 8.3-STABLE (jan 2013) and 9.2-BETA2 --
Firefox SQLite locking issue (John Reynolds)
7. Re: NFS locking between 8.3-STABLE (jan 2013) and 9.2-BETA2
-- Firefox SQLite locking issue (Rick Macklem)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:41:58 +0400
From: Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com
To: Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2
Message-ID:
CAAoTqfu7n9j9V=H4Af2oTka=aS_UqKwkMCxE=ajm9i3gqxb...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
2013/8/2 Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:54:08PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev typed:
I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
We don't use IPv6 in our company.
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
server, but not A (IPv4).
Any ideas?
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to
ip address.
14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53417+ ? xxx.ru. (24)
[13/98]
14:59:50.793662 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.19032:
53417* 0/1/0 (75)
14:59:50.793696 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.55299 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53418+ A? xxx.ru. (24)
Here it is definately asking an A record.
And? It's not A record of mx server.
14:59:50.794087 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.55299:
53418* 7/0/0 A 192.168.2.11, A 192.168.2.12, A 192.168.41.4, A
192.168.14.12, A 192.168.34.100, A 192.168.34.110, A 192.168.44.19
(136)
And here is the reply. The quetion is more why is it repeating the same
query (below) over and over.
Yes, reply about xxx.ru, not about mx server's IP which is kalmar.xxx.ru
Ruben
14:59:50.973445 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.29244 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53419+ MX? xxx.ru. (24)
14:59:50.973754 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.29244:
53419* 1/0/1 MX kalmar.xxx.ru. 10 (63)
14:59:50.974061 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.56461 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53420+ ? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31)
14:59:50.974340 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.56461:
53420* 0/1/0 (82)
14:59:50.974570 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.28332 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53421+ ? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31)
14:59:50.974887 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.28332:
53421* 0/1/0 (82)
14:59:50.974919 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.21453 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53422+ ? kalmar. (24)
14:59:50.975290 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.21453:
53422 ServFail 0/0/0 (24)
14:59:50.975314 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.63038 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53422+ ? kalmar. (24)
14:59:50.975674 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.63038:
53422 ServFail 0/0/0 (24)
14:59:50.975749 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.38393 hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53423+ ? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31)
14:59:50.976105 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain reticulum.xxx.ru.38393:
53423* 0/1/0 (82)
14:59:50.976176 IP
