Re: pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)
2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24 Is there some reason this does not work ? reason - interfaces names with . :) -- WBR, Виталий Моисеев, v...@vm.net.ua Nick-hdl: VM347-RIPE, VM265-UANIC ICQ# 111222168 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)
2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24 Is there some reason this does not work ? reason - names of interfaces with . :) -- WBR, Виталий Моисеев, v...@vm.net.ua Nick-hdl: VM347-RIPE, VM265-UANIC ICQ# 111222168 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pppoe server option
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:35:40PM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: H -l switch configures label in ppp.conf H -p swicth configures provider name which is announced in Ethernet. H H Thank you for your reply. H I think comment statement in /etc/defaults/rc.conf should be changed H because the current comment means '-l'. Otherwise we should change H /etc/rc.network. Don't you think so? H H -- /etc/defaults/rc.conf -- H pppoed_provider=service-pppoe # Provider and ppp(8) config file entry. H --- [ccing Alfred, since cvs annotate points at him] If label has not been specified, it defaults to provider. So this comment is not meaningless. If you want to specify another label, you should use pppoed_flags variable. I think it will be better to change comment to PPPoE Provider name. Alfred, what do you think? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pppoe server option
Hi,
From: Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pppoe server option
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:12:50 +0300
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
H I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network.
H When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not
H work well. The string service-pppoe is an entry in
H /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE server.
H
H pppoed_enable=YES# Run the PPP over Ethernet daemon.
H pppoed_provider=service-pppoe# Provider and ppp(8) config file entry.
H pppoed_interface=fxp0# The interface that pppoed runs on.
H
H In /etc/rc.network, 'pppoed_provider' is passed into pppoe with -p
H option. After booting os, pppoe arguments are as follows:
H
Hpppoed ... -p service-pppoe fxp0
H
H But this option does not work. We should use -l instead of -p like
H this:
H
Hpppoed ... -l service-pppoe fxp0
H
H To use -l, I think the line 822 in /etc/rc.network should be modified.
H
H822pppoed_flags=${pppoed_flags} -p
${pppoed_provider}
H
H822pppoed_flags=${pppoed_flags} -l
${pppoed_provider}
H
H After modifying the above line, pppoed server works well.
H But is this modification correct?
No.
-l switch configures label in ppp.conf
-p swicth configures provider name which is announced in Ethernet.
Thank you for your reply.
I think comment statement in /etc/defaults/rc.conf should be changed
because the current comment means '-l'. Otherwise we should change
/etc/rc.network. Don't you think so?
-- /etc/defaults/rc.conf --
pppoed_provider=service-pppoe# Provider and ppp(8) config file entry.
---
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
-
Hideki YAMAMOTO |
Broadband Media Solutions Department | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Broadband Media Company | Tel: +81-48-420-7012
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | FAX: +81-48-420-7016
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pppoe server option
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
H I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network.
H When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not
H work well. The string service-pppoe is an entry in
H /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE server.
H
H pppoed_enable=YES # Run the PPP over Ethernet daemon.
H pppoed_provider=service-pppoe # Provider and ppp(8) config file entry.
H pppoed_interface=fxp0 # The interface that pppoed runs on.
H
H In /etc/rc.network, 'pppoed_provider' is passed into pppoe with -p
H option. After booting os, pppoe arguments are as follows:
H
Hpppoed ... -p service-pppoe fxp0
H
H But this option does not work. We should use -l instead of -p like
H this:
H
Hpppoed ... -l service-pppoe fxp0
H
H To use -l, I think the line 822 in /etc/rc.network should be modified.
H
H822 pppoed_flags=${pppoed_flags} -p
${pppoed_provider}
H
H822 pppoed_flags=${pppoed_flags} -l
${pppoed_provider}
H
H After modifying the above line, pppoed server works well.
H But is this modification correct?
No.
-l switch configures label in ppp.conf
-p swicth configures provider name which is announced in Ethernet.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
Title: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) Can you tell me exactly what options you put in your kernel? - Original Message - From: Bernd Fürwitt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:37 PM Subject: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers.After starting ppp I get the following error messagelinker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel modeThe kernel panics, and i got no further errors in logfiles.Netgraph is built directly into the kernel, also the tun-interface.what's going wrong ?
Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics, and i got no further errors in logfiles. Netgraph is built directly into the kernel, also the tun-interface. what's going wrong ? Old modules? You sure you have all of the netgraph modules PPPoE requires statically compiled in (not just NETGRAPH)? Kris PGP signature
RE: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
Title: RE: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics, and i got no further errors in logfiles. Netgraph is built directly into the kernel, also the tun-interface. what's going wrong ? Old modules? You sure you have all of the netgraph modules PPPoE requires statically compiled in (not just NETGRAPH)? I tried compiling in all of the netgraph-stuff (statically), the result remains the same. I built the world, after changing any kernel-options. And now i've upgraded again to 4.3-stable (16.05.01). Nothing changed.
Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:34:43AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics, and i got no further errors in logfiles. Netgraph is built directly into the kernel, also the tun-interface. what's going wrong ? Old modules? You sure you have all of the netgraph modules PPPoE requires statically compiled in (not just NETGRAPH)? I tried compiling in all of the netgraph-stuff (statically), the result remains the same. I built the world, after changing any kernel-options. And now i've upgraded again to 4.3-stable (16.05.01). Nothing changed. The error message above indicates it's trying to kldload something because it's not present in your running kernel. Can you post your kernel config file? Kris PGP signature
Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
I think there is an open pr about this where the dynamic loading is broken, this was talked about maybe a week ago. Roughly if part of it is compiled statically but not all, the kldloader can't tell and tries to load it anyways(the stuff that's already compiled in). Not trying to do anything but open the possibility that this could be an existing open problem. - Original Message - From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bernd Fürwitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Kris Kennaway' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:39 AM Subject: Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Ted Sikora wrote: Recently my cable service reduced the bandwidth. Now upstreams average 16k and downstream 400k. There has to be something better. Several users on my node (all BSD/Linux users) have been enjoying our own little private network with speeds up to 900k both ways.(600k average) Now it's terrible. They now limited the internal network to 33k between users. Compared to before it's like putting us on dialups. When you signed on, didn't you agree to pay per month for a given service level? If I understand you correctly, @home has now changed the terms of the agreement. We need competition for cable service in a big, big way. :-( I don't have the option for DSL where I live (yet), and my cable "ISP" (I have to put that in quotes, because they couldn't find their bungholes with both hands and a roadmap) guarantees 1500K down and 500K up for what I'm paying, BUT they block all the ports below 1024. :-( I can hack around that, given a friendly site outside their firewall who's willing to divert packets for me, but it's still a PITA. Regards, Chris BeHanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: PPPoE
Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. So, having been stuck at one point in this same situation (i live in Toronto, Canada, and the xDSL provided by Bell Sympatico uses PPPoE) i re-post the question: Is there any possibility of PPPoE being an **installation** option. If PPPoE is your only connection option to install FreeBSD, a post-install How-To won't really help much. :-( If it's a matter of demand, there's several thousand DSL subscribers in Canada who are stuck with PPPoE... i'm sure several would love to avoid having to buy the FreeBSD CD. I'd be willing to ask them all to submit their email addresses for a group request if it would grease the wheels. Heck, i'm sure some of them would even volunteer to help out! I know i would lend whatever resources i could. :-) Regards, Mit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Sikora Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPPoE William Wong wrote: Hi there, Does anyone know if there are plans to support PPPoE outta the box? (without recompiling the kernel) I'm not sure how many people are affected by this, but not being able to do a PPPoE install from the boot disks is a bugger. Here's a HOWTO for PPPoe -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote: Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. So, having been stuck at one point in this same situation (i live in Toronto, Canada, and the xDSL provided by Bell Sympatico uses PPPoE) i re-post the question: Is there any possibility of PPPoE being an **installation** option. If PPPoE is your only connection option to install FreeBSD, a post-install How-To won't really help much. :-( If it's a matter of demand, there's several thousand DSL subscribers in Canada who are stuck with PPPoE... Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM. So our northern friends are not alone in this situation... Gary To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM. So our northern friends are not alone in this situation... My own experience with PPPoE and HellAtlantic Infospeed is absolutely horrid. It is no coincidence that BA is ranked at the absolute bottom in the national ratings on www.dslreports.com. Stay away if at all possible -- you truly don't get what you don't pay for... We are switching away from BA as fast as we can. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote: Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. Yeah I know. I emailed him earlier. I posted the FAQ in case anyone was having trouble with PPPoe. It would be nice to have the option on the install floppies. All the DSL users are left in the cold. It's starting to become as popular as Cable. At least in my area. -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Dan Ts'o wrote: Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM. So our northern friends are not alone in this situation... My own experience with PPPoE and HellAtlantic Infospeed is absolutely horrid. It is no coincidence that BA is ranked at the absolute bottom in the national ratings on www.dslreports.com. Stay away if at all possible -- you truly don't get what you don't pay for... We are switching away from BA as fast as we can. They have SNET/SBC in my area. According to them it uses DHCP not PPPoe.(Yet their faq says PPPoe?) I ordered it for the 14th out of curiosity. See how it stands up to cable. Anyone have experience with SNET DSL? I ordered it with NTPLEX.net as my ISP. You can chose your own ISP. -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE
Ted Sikora wrote: Dan Ts'o wrote: Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM. So our northern friends are not alone in this situation... My own experience with PPPoE and HellAtlantic Infospeed is absolutely horrid. It is no coincidence that BA is ranked at the absolute bottom in the national ratings on www.dslreports.com. Stay away if at all possible -- you truly don't get what you don't pay for... We are switching away from BA as fast as we can. They have SNET/SBC in my area. According to them it uses DHCP not PPPoe.(Yet their faq says PPPoe?) I ordered it for the 14th out of curiosity. See how it stands up to cable. Anyone have experience with SNET DSL? I ordered it with NTPLEX.net as my ISP. You can chose your own ISP. I just checked dslreports.com not very encouraging. Not very many happy people. I guess I'll find out for myself. Recently my cable service reduced the bandwidth. Now upstreams average 16k and downstream 400k. There has to be something better. Several users on my node (all BSD/Linux users) have been enjoying our own little private network with speeds up to 900k both ways.(600k average) Now it's terrible. They now limited the internal network to 33k between users. Compared to before it's like putting us on dialups. -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
