Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:07:29 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, is apm not available in 5.4? I've loaded the apm module in loader.conf, and kldstat shows it loaded but /dev/apm* isn't created and there are no messages in dmesg either. How do I enable this? It is available. I'm running it on my laptop now. I've these in my config. grep apm /etc/rc.conf apm_enable="YES" apmd_enable="YES" And I know you can't use acpi and apm together, so make sure you are not using acpi. If you are using acpi, you should prefer that above apm. Ronald. PS: posting more info, like the output of dmesg is helpfull. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Hi, > > is apm not available in 5.4? > > I've loaded the apm module in loader.conf, and kldstat shows it loaded > but /dev/apm* isn't created and there are no messages in dmesg either. > How do I enable this? Please, use acpi instead of apm. That's default rule. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
Ronald Klop wrote: > It is available. I'm running it on my laptop now. > I've these in my config. > > grep apm /etc/rc.conf > apm_enable="YES" > apmd_enable="YES" Do you have apm(4) compiled into the kernel? I've loaded the module in loader.conf and during boot aswell when I try to use apm(8), I get: apm: can't open /dev/apm: No such file or directory kldstat output is the following: Id Refs AddressSize Name 12 0xc040 5dde24 kernel 21 0xc09de000 62b4 apm.ko The machine is a Compaq Armada m700, kernel is GENERIC from fresh installation; dmesg output is attached. mkb. Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (845.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x68a Stepping = 10 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 469696512 (447 MB) avail memory = 449949696 (429 MB) npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0x5000-0x53ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) cbb0: mem 0x4110-0x41100fff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci0 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb1: mem 0x4118-0x41180fff irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0 cardbus1: on cbb1 pccard1: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x4010-0x401f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x4020-0x403f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0x2000-0x203f mem 0x4120-0x4121,0x4128-0x41280fff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:d0:59:64:93:3b pci0: at device 9.1 (no driver attached) orm0: at iomem 0xd-0xd17ff,0xc-0xc on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (irq) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) sio4: at port 0x100-0x107,0x3e8-0x3ef irq 3 drq 5 on isa0 sio4: type 16550A unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounter "TSC" frequency 845849804 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 19077MB [38760/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: DVDROM at ata0-slave PIO4 wi0: at port 0x180-0x1bf irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (8.36.1) wi0: Ethernet address: 00:02:2d:a9:07:71 wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:48:36 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ronald Klop wrote: It is available. I'm running it on my laptop now. I've these in my config. grep apm /etc/rc.conf apm_enable="YES" apmd_enable="YES" Do you have apm(4) compiled into the kernel? I've loaded the module in loader.conf and during boot aswell when I try to use apm(8), I get: apm: can't open /dev/apm: No such file or directory kldstat output is the following: Id Refs AddressSize Name 12 0xc040 5dde24 kernel 21 0xc09de000 62b4 apm.ko The machine is a Compaq Armada m700, kernel is GENERIC from fresh installation; dmesg output is attached. Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. Does your machine have apm? As somebody else mentioned first try if you have ACPI support on your machine. It is a modern, more advanced version of apm. If ACPI works never look at APM again. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, 12 May 2005 17:23:52 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ronald Klop wrote: Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. Does your machine have apm? As somebody else mentioned first try if you have ACPI support on your machine. It is a modern, more advanced version of apm. If ACPI works never look at APM again. Yes, it does have APM, I've used it with Linux and NetBSD without any problems. FreeBSD's ACPI is flakey on that machine.. if I use the wi-fi pccard, I always get a freeze (if it's already inserted) or panic (if I insert it). Report your panic on the mailinglist or using send-pr. I can't help you with it, but there are people who can. Try to compile a kernel with apm in and acpi not in and I think I have also something like pmtimer which is used by apm. And make sure acpi isn't loaded as a module. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
Ronald Klop wrote: > Report your panic on the mailinglist or using send-pr. I can't help you > with it, but there are people who can. > Try to compile a kernel with apm in and acpi not in and I think I have > also something like pmtimer which is used by apm. And make sure acpi > isn't loaded as a module. I don't know if that's worth it... acpi is known to be rather flakey on older machines (such as this notebook) and, given the average response time to the PRs I have filed, I'm not sure I still have this machine when it then gets some attention... I'll now try and build a kernel with apm built in, as apparently the .ko doesn't do anything. Maybe this will work. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
I wrote: > I'll now try and build a kernel > with apm built in, as apparently the .ko doesn't do anything. Maybe > this will work. Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no device node. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:40:20 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wrote: I'll now try and build a kernel with apm built in, as apparently the .ko doesn't do anything. Maybe this will work. Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no device node. I found this quote for you. Maybe it helps. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/laptop/article.html On FreeBSD 5.X, you also have to set hint.apm.0.disabled="0" in /boot/device.hints. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
I wrote: > Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no > device node. The cause was that I didn't change in /boot/devices.hint the line: hint.apm.0.disabled="0" to "1"... Thanks to Ronald Klop for the hint. I didn't know it was explicitly disabled by default, maybe I should read the handbook more often. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
> The cause was that I didn't change in /boot/devices.hint the line: > hint.apm.0.disabled="0" to "1"... Thanks to Ronald Klop for the hint. Or rather, the other way round, of course. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: apm in 5.4
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:48:36 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The machine is a Compaq Armada m700, kernel is GENERIC from fresh > >installation; dmesg output is attached. > > Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. Does your machine have apm? > As somebody else mentioned first try if you have ACPI support on your > machine. It is a modern, more advanced version of apm. If ACPI works never > look at APM again. Don't bother -- I've been fighting with ACPI on and off for the last couple years on an m700. I always end up giving up and going back to APM. No suspend, but at least the battery level can be read. After MANY variations of ASL hacks it can be made to boot but is never stable. I would be surprised if ACPI worked right even in Windows on these laptops. There are a few others with the same model who have had similar expeiences -- AFAIK nobody has ever managed to get it working reliably. Craig ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
