Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
Mike Tancsa wrote: At 04:53 AM 21/09/2005, Pertti Kosunen wrote: Do i need to do something special with gstripe when upgrading to RELENG_6 from RELENG_5? Sorry, dont know, but a search through the archives might have the answer. I suspect it wont be an issue Everything went fine even without reboot after make installkernel. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out the issue! Gavin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out the issue! Gavin How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. thx -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
At 12:58 PM 22/09/2005, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: I think the version in 7 and 6 relies on other changes in the tree. Have a look at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-July/017292.html http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/MFC-RELENG_5/patch-em that takes into account those changes. ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
I had this same issue with an Intel Pro 1000 nic. I just downloaded/installed the current driver from Intel and all was good. The driver I'm referring to is here: http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=NI nst=YesProductID=838DwnldID=9159strOSs=52OSFullName=FreeBSD*lang=eng Hope that helps. --Jade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector Lecuanda Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:10 PM To: Gavin Atkinson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; John Baldwin Subject: Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x] On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out the issue! Gavin How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. thx -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.4/109 - Release Date: 9/21/2005 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On 9/22/05, Jade Spangenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had this same issue with an Intel Pro 1000 nic. I just downloaded/installed the current driver from Intel and all was good. The driver I'm referring to is here: http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=NI nst=YesProductID=838DwnldID=9159strOSs=52OSFullName=FreeBSD*lang=eng Hope that helps. --Jade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector Lecuanda Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:10 PM To: Gavin Atkinson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; John Baldwin Subject: Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x] On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out the issue! Gavin How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. thx -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt Indeed, the driver from intel worked like a charm... you may want to download it from ftp://aiedownload.intel.com/df-support/9159/eng/em-3.2.15.tar.gz since intel's website breaks lynx or CURL... -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
Mike Tancsa wrote: Hi, The driver in RELENG_4 is essentially the same as in HEAD and RELENG_6. Someone backported the changes from the RELENG_6 version to 5.x and posted a link in the mailling list perhaps a month or so ago. Have a look through the archives for the patches. However, I would suggest you go to RELENG_6 from 5.x. 6.x is a bit faster on a number of counts and quite stable on the boxes we have it running on. Do i need to do something special with gstripe when upgrading to RELENG_6 from RELENG_5? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 04:53 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. -- John: Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Who would be the person to contact regarding this driver? Hmm, you can try asking on stable@ or current@ perhaps. I'm not sure who the correct person to talk to about em(4) is these days. I believe it is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Power Users Use the Power to Serve = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On 9/20/05, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch supports this device, but 5.x does not. Is support for this device to be included in the near future? who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. -- John: Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Who would be the person to contact regarding this driver? Thank you! -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
At 04:53 PM 20/09/2005, Hector Lecuanda wrote: Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x does not. =( Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? Hi, The driver in RELENG_4 is essentially the same as in HEAD and RELENG_6. Someone backported the changes from the RELENG_6 version to 5.x and posted a link in the mailling list perhaps a month or so ago. Have a look through the archives for the patches. However, I would suggest you go to RELENG_6 from 5.x. 6.x is a bit faster on a number of counts and quite stable on the boxes we have it running on. ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
