[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1826] Store advisors related city data separately from ai data
Update of patch #1826 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1826 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1818] default_ai_get_self()
Update of patch #1818 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1818 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1832] Threaded downloader
Update of patch #1832 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1832 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1824] Update debian directory
Update of patch #1824 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1824 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1698] Dahomey nation
Follow-up Comment #9, patch #1698 (project freeciv): The term early modern does have a definition, in the sense that it is used to refer to the years named in European history. So in that sense it is not open to interpretation: it begins with a break from the past (widespread access to books/the Protestant reformation/discovery of the new world), and ends with more disruption (French revolution/mass industrialization). I'm less certain about that modern/contemporary distinction, which I would suggest might be dated to the fall of the Berlin wall...but I never studied modern history, so I am much less sure of this division. It may be that it is as closely defined in the eyes of modern historians as the term 'early modern.' The problem, of course, with any division which is made, is that the divisions are made on the basis of European history (as they already are, to some extent). The more fine-grained the divisions become, the more the history of just one region is highlighted. On the other hand, more divisions are needed, as the number of nations grows. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1698 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1850] Server setting to control if unreachable unit protects reachable ones
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?1850 Summary: Server setting to control if unreachable unit protects reachable ones Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 10:52 Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.3.0 ___ Details: Over the years there has been numerous requests that bomber in a tile should not make it impossible to attack other units in it. Attached patch adds server option unreachableprotects for this. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 10:52 Name: UnreachableProtectsSet.diff Size: 9kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=9803 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1850 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16417] Graphical glitches when FOW (graphically) turned off
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?16417 Summary: Graphical glitches when FOW (graphically) turned off Project: Freeciv Submitted by: alocritani Submitted on: Friday 08/13/10 at 09:12 Category: client-gtk-2.0 Severity: 2 - Minor Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: 2.2.2 Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: GNU/Linux Planned Release: ___ Details: When turned off, graphical glitches appear near the area where the FOW should end, if the terrain is hills See attached screenshot ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/10 at 09:12 Name: Graphical_glitches.png Size: 157kB By: alocritani http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=9804 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16417 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1851] Unit capture
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?1851 Summary: Unit capture Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 13:32 Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.3.0 ___ Details: This patch adds unit type flags Capturer and Capturable. Capturers can capture capturable units instead of fighting them. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 13:32 Name: Capture.diff Size: 9kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=9805 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1851 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1850] Server setting to control if unreachable unit protects reachable ones
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #1850 (project freeciv): Seems the patch just makes unreachable units reachable. When you kill reachable units, unreachable are killed too. See the attached savegame: try to kill Confederates' spy covered by AWACS (47:96) by Mongol unit or wait till AI kills it. AWACS would be dead too. (file #9806) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: omg.sav.gz Size:268 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1850 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1850] Server setting to control if unreachable unit protects reachable ones
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #1850 (project freeciv): Yes, stack death rule is not touched. Change is that unreachable units are unreachable only if alone (or with other unreachable units) on tile. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1850 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1852] contemplate_terrain_improvements() from autosettler.c to aicity.c
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?1852 Summary: contemplate_terrain_improvements() from autosettler.c to aicity.c Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 14:41 Category: ai Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.3.0 ___ Details: This patch moves contemplate_terrain_improvements() and its helper functions from autosetttler.c to aicity.c. Function is only used by AI to decide if it should build settlers. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 14:41 Name: CTIMove.diff Size: 9kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=9807 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1852 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1852] contemplate_terrain_improvements() from autosettler.c to aicity.c
Update of patch #1852 (project freeciv): Depends on: = patch #1848 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1852 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16418] Crashing Server (update_unit_activities)
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?16418 Summary: Crashing Server (update_unit_activities) Project: Freeciv Submitted by: None Submitted on: 金曜日 2010年08月13日 at 14:18 CEST Category: general Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: 2.2.2+ Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: GNU/Linux Planned Release: ___ Details: A problem has been encountered on the server. Load the save data attached,server will crash when two turns forward. #0 0x7f77335d535c in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x7f77335ccdc9 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0041b99c in update_unit_activities (pplayer=0x0) at unittools.c:546 punit = (struct unit *) 0xfac1d0 punit_index = 6 punit_size = 8 #3 0x0040c26f in srv_main () at srv_main.c:769 No locals. #4 0x004036f6 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffcbb8) at civserver.c:359 inx = 3 showhelp = false showvers = false option = value optimized out ___ File Attachments: --- Date: 金曜日 2010年08月13日 at 14:18 CEST Name: freeciv-T0173-Y01230-auto.sav.gz Size: 132kB By: None http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=9808 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16418 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1850] Server setting to control if unreachable unit protects reachable ones
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #1850 (project freeciv): I've made quick'n'dirty patch (which seems to work though) which makes stack death rule applied only for reachable units. Maybe it's worth raising a thread on forum to decide if this behaviour would be appropriate for players? (file #9809) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: Stack.QnD.patchSize:0 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1850 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1853] Building advisor code from ai/aicity.c to advisors/buildingadv.c
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?1853 Summary: Building advisor code from ai/aicity.c to advisors/buildingadv.c Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 15:58 Category: ai Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: 2.3.0 ___ Details: This patch moves building advisor code from ai/aicity.c to new file server/advisors/buildingadv.c This is just initial step. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 15:58 Name: BldgAdv.diff.bz2 Size: 17kB By: cazfi http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=9810 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1853 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1853] Building advisor code from ai/aicity.c to advisors/buildingadv.c
Update of patch #1853 (project freeciv): Depends on: = patch #1852 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1853 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16410] Default ruleset loaded in server start even if user is going to switch to another ruleset
Update of bug #16410 (project freeciv): Category:rulesets = general Priority: 5 - Normal = 3 - Low Assigned to: cazfi = None Summary: nations.ruleset is ignored in a custom ruleset = Default ruleset loaded in server start even if user is going to switch to another ruleset ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Ok, now I believe I understand what you mean. Unlike what subject suggested this has nothing to do with nations.ruleset. You are using copy of default nations.ruleset, which uses separate nation definitions under nation/. Instead you are being hit by the fact that default ruleset is loaded before your custom ruleset, and that loading of default ruleset fails. Server is currently designed so that it always requires ruleset to be present. Initially, before user type (or as in your case it's being read from script file) rulesetdir command, default ruleset is being used. Workaround: don't break default ruleset :-) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16410 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1685] Remove unnecessary padding around unit_info_label
Update of patch #1685 (project freeciv): Status:Done = Need Info Assigned to: syntron = pepeto Planned Release: 2.3.0 = 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.3.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #4: A user on freeciv.net reported me the problem too with the English language when many units are selected (I guess at least 10). If there is no answer to my previous question in two week, I will revert this patch. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1685 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16418] Crashing Server (update_unit_activities)
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #16418 (project freeciv): This looks related to the recent pillage changes. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16418 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16418] Crashing Server (update_unit_activities)
Update of bug #16418 (project freeciv): Planned Release: = 2.2.3 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16418 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16417] Graphical glitches when FOW (graphically) turned off
Update of bug #16417 (project freeciv): Priority: 5 - Normal = 1 - Later ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16417 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16191] no_land_attack flag
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16191 (project freeciv): i only wanted to point, that No_Land_Attack should only attack units from Sea class because of this, the whole flag is pointless... nwm, just added NoBuild tu submarines and don't have problem anymore petro ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16191 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16418] Crashing Server (update_unit_activities)
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16418 (project freeciv): Yes, this sounds similar to bug #16100. I can reproduce it (with S2_2 r17748); with assertions enabled, it hits the assertion I predicted https://gna.org/bugs/?16100#comment7 in that bug: freeciv-server: unittools.c:546: total_activity_targeted: Assertion `!(tgt == S_LAST base == -1)' failed. I'll look into it. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16418 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16100] Crash in territory_claiming_base()
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #16100 (project freeciv): I suspect bug #16418 is the same issue as this, and there's a reproduction case there. I'll look into that. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16100 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16419] Server will not start and cannot start new game
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?16419 Summary: Server will not start and cannot start new game Project: Freeciv Submitted by: None Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 21:48 CEST Category: client-gtk-2.0 Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: redemblem...@gmail.com Open/Closed: Open Release: 2.2.2 - stable Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: GNU/Linux Planned Release: ___ Details: After compiling with no errors (using ./configure --prefix=) I installed FreeCiv 2.2.2 to my Games directory in /home. When I try to start the game I get the following error: Starting server Couldn't connect to the server We probably couldn't start it from here You'll have to start one manually. Sorry... I can see that the freeciv-server is running and it started its own processes: 1) home/username/.xsession-errors 2) /dev/null 3) IPv6 network connection on TCP port 0 (0) I don't think my network is IPv6 so perhaps this is related to the issue? Also, I have attached the relevant contents of /home/username/.xsession-errors ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 21:48 CEST Name: new file Size: 556B By: None http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=9811 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16419 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1467] Add the swabia nation to the next release
Oh... There is a Württembergian Ruleset? Okay then perhaps you should use this name - württembergian - if I overthink it, there could be people from Augsburg etc. in Bavaria, who also call themselves swabians, and perhaps they could vote against this ruleset because they feel kept out :) Because most swabians live in Württemberg, there are mostly the same as in this würtembergian ruleset. I do not know the quality of it, but perhaps there is a way to merge those two rulesets! Do you have a link to it? I could contact the creator and work together with him. No, the swabian/württembergian flag is the one I used, there is no other! Am 13.08.2010 07:33, schrieb J.M. Maalderink: Update of patch #1467 (project freeciv): Status:None = Need Info ___ Follow-up Comment #1: There are Badians and Württembergians by now... But Swabians can nonetheless be added as well. There are still some issues though. The leaders seem to be mostly famous people from Swabia or with Swabian background. Hermeric or Van Stauffenberg are ok to me, but I'm not sure about Kepler or Einstein. Could you make a list with Swabian leaders or people that were otherwise of political/military relevance in Swabia? Also the flag needs to be in .svg, the .png ones you have added look very similar to the Saxon one. Is there a also Swabian flag that is not black-yellow? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1467 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16421] ./civ -a and NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?16421 Summary: ./civ -a and NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE Project: Freeciv Submitted by: kernigh Submitted on: Friday 08/13/2010 at 22:06 Category: client-gtk-2.0 Severity: 2 - Minor Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: S2_2 Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: *BSD Planned Release: ___ Details: If you autoconnect to a server that requests a new password (using both password fields), then freeciv-gtk fails to show the connection screen. This is because pages.c only calls set_client_page(PAGE_NETWORK) at ENTER_PASSWORD_TYPE case, not at NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE case. This is similar to bug #16311, except that the connection becomes stuck at the main screen instead of the connection screen. The fix for bug #16311 only fixes ENTER_PASSWORD_TYPE case, not NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE case. p22-new-password.diff fixes this bug for S2_2; I tested by autoconnecting to a cazfi.net server that wanted a new password. p21-new-password.diff is for S2_1, but there are almost no 2.1 servers and I found none that wanted a new password, so I have not confirmed whether S2_1 has this bug or whether p21-new-password.diff fixes it. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 22:06 Name: p21-new-password.diff Size: 750B By: kernigh add set_client_page(PAGE_NETWORK) to NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE case http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=9812 --- Date: Friday 08/13/2010 at 22:06 Name: p22-new-password.diff Size: 750B By: kernigh add set_client_page(PAGE_NETWORK) to NEW_PASSWORD_TYPE case http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=9813 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16421 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16419] Server will not start and cannot start new game
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #16419 (project freeciv): I tried to reproduce this bug. I installed SVN r17748 of S2_2 into /home/kernigh/prefix/x-freeciv-2.2 of my OpenBSD system, then started the client: $ prefix/x-freeciv-2.2/bin/freeciv-gtk2 The Start New Game button produced the same message: Starting server Couldn't connect to the server We probably couldn't start it from here You'll have to start one manually. Sorry... freeciv-server never started. I found no freeciv-server processes and no messages about /dev/null or IPv6. So I might not have reproduced the same bug. The workaround for me was to add prefix/x-freeciv-2.2/bin to my PATH: $ PATH=prefix/x-freeciv-2.2/bin:$PATH $ freeciv-gtk2 Then I can start game like normal. (I like to skip 'gmake install' and run Freeciv from the build directory using ./civ, so I never noticed this bug before now.) ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16419 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #16419] Server will not start and cannot start new game
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16419 (project freeciv): Last year I experienced a similar bug that was caused by SELinux. By default in Ubuntu, Fedora, and probably others, SELinux blocks servers that aren't in /usr. Any other similar permission enforcing program could also cause the same problem. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?16419 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
