Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39346) Dithering and smooth graphics should be toggleable
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 2007/4/18, Jason Dorje Short [EMAIL PROTECTED]: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 Ulrik Sverdrup wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 Comparing 2.1 beta 4 to 2.0, 2.1 looks better because of changed drawing code. 2.1 has smoohter edges and looks better. Significan is however the big regression in drawing performance between 2.0 and 2.1. In 2.1, right-clicking around to move the map is painfully slow compared to 2.0 (where it is adequately quick!). I think this should be treated like a regression. Just like we have a checkbox for Better for of war drawing, please instate a toggle for dithering (or otherwise smooth graphics), if that can improve drawing performance. it would be greatly appreciated. For me 2.1 is a great step forward, also in usability all around. Graphics is nothing compared to this, and because of that I would like 2.1 to be as snappy as 2.0 (with amplio) Amplio is not gonna be as fast as trident or isotrident; this is unavoidable. There ARE a lot of configurable options in the graphics section. Does playing with them improve things at all? -jason I'm using amplio in both 2.0 and 2.1... I've been trying all options and there is nothing that can make it close to 2.0 scrolling speed etc. Running Ubuntu 6.10/ppc, compiled freeciv myself. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39346) Dithering and smooth graphics should be toggleable
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 Comparing 2.1 beta 4 to 2.0, 2.1 looks better because of changed drawing code. 2.1 has smoohter edges and looks better. Significan is however the big regression in drawing performance between 2.0 and 2.1. In 2.1, right-clicking around to move the map is painfully slow compared to 2.0 (where it is adequately quick!). I think this should be treated like a regression. Just like we have a checkbox for Better for of war drawing, please instate a toggle for dithering (or otherwise smooth graphics), if that can improve drawing performance. it would be greatly appreciated. For me 2.1 is a great step forward, also in usability all around. Graphics is nothing compared to this, and because of that I would like 2.1 to be as snappy as 2.0 (with amplio) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39346) Dithering and smooth graphics should be toggleable
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 Ulrik Sverdrup wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 Comparing 2.1 beta 4 to 2.0, 2.1 looks better because of changed drawing code. 2.1 has smoohter edges and looks better. Significan is however the big regression in drawing performance between 2.0 and 2.1. In 2.1, right-clicking around to move the map is painfully slow compared to 2.0 (where it is adequately quick!). I think this should be treated like a regression. Just like we have a checkbox for Better for of war drawing, please instate a toggle for dithering (or otherwise smooth graphics), if that can improve drawing performance. it would be greatly appreciated. For me 2.1 is a great step forward, also in usability all around. Graphics is nothing compared to this, and because of that I would like 2.1 to be as snappy as 2.0 (with amplio) Amplio is not gonna be as fast as trident or isotrident; this is unavoidable. There ARE a lot of configurable options in the graphics section. Does playing with them improve things at all? -jason ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
