[Freedos-user] boot cd freedos 1.1 + panasonic usb drivers
Hi at all, for working with some pc programmable radio transceivers, i' need a bootable cd with freedos and panasonic usb drivers (di100'ddanf usbaspi etc). I've tried the bets cd from freedos 1.1. but failed emm management and breth usb drivers. How i can create a bootable cd rom with freedos 1.1. full and panasonic drivers. Now i run on main pc Linux puppy lucid 5.2.5 and on older pc without usb fredoos 1.0 Thanks Roberto iw2evk Milan -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/boot-cd-freedos-1.1-%2B-panasonic-usb-drivers-tp32317647p32317647.html Sent from the FreeDOS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
[Freedos-user] freedos.org unreachable
I noticed, that the main site is visible as www.freedos.org - but not as freedos.org (without www). Maybe a little correction is needed? -- Z. -- Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
[Freedos-user] UIDE Performance -- Small Caches DO Work O.K.!
For years, I have told people to use as much cache as possible with UIDE, to handle today's large files and still leave space in the cache for DOS directories. Today, Tuesday 23-Aug-2011, I ran experiments using a driver equal to UIDE-S, with a new 10-MB cache size of 1280 8K-byte data blocks. I never liked the 5-MB cache that some users MUST have (only 640 blocks, not enough data!) so I chose to try a 10-MB tiny cache. I ran my usual test of copying a 635-MB video drivers CD to disk. With my regular 500-MB UIDE cache, this test takes around 124 seconds, plus-or-minus about 2. With only the 10-MB cache, the test took 128 seconds, merely 4 seconds more! I checked 25, 50, and 100-MB caches as well, and none suffered in speed from being small-sized! Each performed as well, maybe a hair better in some cases, as the 10-MB cache! So, it seems I may have been All wet! (misinformed) re: UIDE's cache performance v.s. cache size. Users may want to check this on their systems, maybe across a variety of applications. And I expect there are a few large file systems which do need larger caches. But, it now seems that casual users of DOS and UIDE need NOT worry re: using only a 25/50/100-MB cache -- They do seem to perform a LOT better than I expected! Jack R. Ellis -- EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
