Extremely Affordable Prescript[ion Drug!s!

2003-12-07 Thread Loretta Reed







Re: WinXP Protected EAP (PEAP) MS-CHAPv2

2003-12-07 Thread Thierry LARMIER (QoS Telecom)




Hello Justin,

This week I had the same problem than u. 0,9,3 version does not support peap. So u need the latest snapshot. 

Personally, i have installed the 20031204 snapshot. ftp.freeradius.org/pub/radius/CVS-snapshots

The next problem is, if u want to use peap, you need to activate tls. In the configuration file 'radius.conf' there are several items to configure (eg certificate_file, CA_file...). So i tried to andeersand what is it.
I followed step by step the FreeRadius EAP/TLS - WinXP Howto from Raymond McKay V1.2 (10/30/02) [ http://www.impossiblereflex.com/8021x/eap-tls-HOWTO.htm ] . But now, i have a problem with openssl version to generate client certificat with the good format for winXP. 

Good luck
 



Le dim 07/12/2003  06:36, Justin Bailey a crit :

Does version 0.9.3 have support for PEAP, MS-CHAPv2?  (I am running
RedHat 6.2.)  If not, is there a version that does?  If so, what
configuration settings go I need to make to ensure proper exchange for
802.1x authentication.  I found an excellent tutorial concerning MD5/EAP
for pre SP1.  Unfortunately, I am beyond SP1.

Justin

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html






SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not
work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy.

Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in
procy.c or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on
the request?

I am now testing the former. I would appreciate feedback if that is correct.

BTW: I would also appreciate input on where to look for the problem not
getting any rewriting out of mod_perl.  

Paul

Alan DeKok wrote:

I am happy to help fix it as I need this to work soon. However I would
appreciate some pointers where to look.
 
 
   src/lib/valuepair.c, function paircreate()
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-- 
Paul Sijben  tel: +31205210321
VP Architecture and Business Development  direct: +31205210333
Picopointfax: +31205210320
Amsterdam mobile: +31629582154
the Netherlands   http://www.picopoint.com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not
 work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy.

  That should be fixed.

 Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in
 procy.c 

  Absolutely not.  I don't know what you would change there, or why.

or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on
 the request?

  I don't know what you mean by that, either.

  You said the module doesn't do what you expect.  Why not change the
module?

  The configuration for the module currently allows it to search in
the packet, config, or reply.  Why not add proxy and prpxy_reply'
to that list?

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not
  work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy.

   That should be fixed.

  Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in
  procy.c

   Absolutely not.  I don't know what you would change there, or why.

 or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on
  the request?

   I don't know what you mean by that, either.

   You said the module doesn't do what you expect.  Why not change the
 module?

   The configuration for the module currently allows it to search in
 the packet, config, or reply.  Why not add proxy and prpxy_reply'
 to that list?

OK fixed.


   Alan DeKok.

 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Alan DeKok wrote:

 Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not
work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy.
 
 
   That should be fixed.
 
 
Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in
procy.c 
 
 
   Absolutely not.  I don't know what you would change there, or why.
 

Working off the 0.9.3 source code I found that the changes attr_rewrite
made to the vps went nowhere since they were attached to the original
packet rather than the one that is sent to the remote server.

So I moved the call to before the copy is made and the thing worked
perfectly.

Paul
 
or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on
the request?
 
 
   I don't know what you mean by that, either.
 
   You said the module doesn't do what you expect.  Why not change the
 module?
 
   The configuration for the module currently allows it to search in
 the packet, config, or reply.  Why not add proxy and prpxy_reply'
 to that list?
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-- 
Paul Sijben  tel: +31205210321
VP Architecture and Business Development  direct: +31205210333
Picopointfax: +31205210320
Amsterdam mobile: +31629582154
the Netherlands   http://www.picopoint.com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Ah, I see what you mean. Ok that will work as well ;-)

Paul

Kostas Kalevras wrote:

 On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote:
 
 
Paul Sijben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not
work. It operates on request-packet rather than request-proxy.

  That should be fixed.


Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in
procy.c

  Absolutely not.  I don't know what you would change there, or why.


or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on
the request?

  I don't know what you mean by that, either.

  You said the module doesn't do what you expect.  Why not change the
module?

  The configuration for the module currently allows it to search in
the packet, config, or reply.  Why not add proxy and prpxy_reply'
to that list?
 
 
 OK fixed.
 
 
  Alan DeKok.

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

 
 
 --
 Kostas Kalevras   Network Operations Center
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Technical University of Athens, Greece
 Work Phone:   +30 210 7721861
 'Go back to the shadow'   Gandalf
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-- 
Paul Sijben  tel: +31205210321
VP Architecture and Business Development  direct: +31205210333
Picopointfax: +31205210320
Amsterdam mobile: +31629582154
the Netherlands   http://www.picopoint.com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


attribute editing from perl

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
My questions for this week to solve is; how can I rewrite packets from
rlm_perl?

We are trying to do it with:
$RAD_REQUEST{'WISPr-Location-Name'} = TEXT .
RAD_REQUEST{'WISPr-Location-Name'};

That does not yield the desired result.

So the question is in two parts:
1) is it possible to get modified field from Perl back to tbe processed
2) if so, how if the above does not work?

help would be greatly appreciated

Paul
-- 
Paul Sijben  tel: +31205210321
VP Architecture and Business Development  direct: +31205210333
Picopointfax: +31205210320
Amsterdam mobile: +31629582154
the Netherlands   http://www.picopoint.com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


A very humour game

2003-12-07 Thread tgriffin
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=Coat986906_DGQ00_SS[1].jpg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: B98kh6T7U5N706B1rZ

/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgAAZABkAAD/7AARRHVja3kAAQAEPAAA/+4AJkFkb2JlAGTA
AQMAFQQDBgoNAAAB5wAAAhQAAAJvAAADCv/bAIQABgQEBAUEBgUFBgkGBQYJCwgGBggLDAoK
CwoKDBAMDAwMDAwQDA4PEA8ODBMTFBQTExwbGxscHx8fHx8fHx8fHwEHBwcNDA0YEBAYGhUR
FRofHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8f/8IA
EQgAFABGAwERAAIRAQMRAf/EAJYAAQEAAwABBQYHAQEBAQEBAQAA
BQQBAgYQAAIDAQAAACAwAwQFNREAAgMAArIg
MIMSAAMBACAwAUATAAECBAYBBQEAAAEAESExQcEQIDDwUWGh
gZGx0fHh/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAAAHTPfmApv8AK3Z6XtAO8i+phwoN/lbs9L2gR3kf1MOAp0CV
uzkvdXAP/9oACAEBAAEFAgw+ejD56MPnh//aAAgBAgABBQILKbKbI//aAAgBAwABBQIIUwph
H//aAAgBAgIGPwIImJg//9oACAEDAgY/Atf/2gAIAQEBBj8ChqSjTqSjTqSjH//aAAgBAQMB
PyFFDAI8NbCmWbhtcSqwxmutDR5UUF8L/9oACAECAwE/IclzRuaNzL//2gAIAQMDAT8hyVaN
WjVl/9oADAMBAAIRAxEAABD9vN9ft7v59tZt/wD/2gAIAQEDAT8Q4YQ8IowDINlDgDtx+rs2
jzWA4Ei3bDwgAiIE7qq88xUKC3DBSdzIwKjHtcOGeCkSQPZHHJXhyZEw6UGfLfaEWffsmDde
v6mOZ+LobP6o053NDufUvK8EriTcGayMVWo7pig1eE3X/9oACAECAwE/EMk+ymjPspoz7KZf
/9oACAEDAwE/EMlq+D57V9G1dHA4f//Z

question about log_badlogins

2003-12-07 Thread alantu
Hi all
  when I run the log_badlogins, The result username is just a - in the db.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


'-*' operator

2003-12-07 Thread Joe Maimon
Is there any interest in a -*  operator that always matches and deletes 
all attributes from the reply list of the LHS name?

It looks to me that -= is designed to only delete LHS attributes if they 
match the RHS (with the exception if the LHS is ), and that := 
replaces the attribute named in LHS and = just adds if the LHS is not 
already in the reply list.

What was not clear to me from src/main/valuepair.c pairxlatmove() was 
that it seems that -= will delete ALL LHS named attributes from the 
reply list if the RHS from the current loop matches.

If I am on track here shouldnt this be done like this:

remove the special 'NULL' clause of -=?
-= loops through the found list to find the matching RHS, seperates that 
out, sets -next to NULL and sends it to pairdelete
-* Replaces NULL clause of -= and deletes all LHS named attrs from the 
reply list. (functions most like current -= with NULL RHS)

-= is not documented in the users.5 as shipped with the server.

Joe

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html