RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-19 Thread Jeremy Salch
I'm using it with A MySQL backend which is on the same server

I'll give that a try and report back what I find.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco leap problem with pre3 


"Jeremy Salch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created it again and this time it showed up as follows
...

  Which is exactly the same set of error messages.

> I couldn't seem to make it happen in -X mode.  Which makes things 
> difficult.

  Try: radiusd -f

  Debug mode *with* threads.  See which modules are being executed, and
where the requests stop.  That's what the request numbers are for: tracking
the behaviour of the server for a particular request.


  Also, you still haven't explained if you're using databases which could
block.  Did you read my earlier message about my setup?

  Try a test setup: 12 names/passwords in the 'users' file, EAP & LEAP, and
*nothing* else in authorize or authenticate.  Run massive amounts of LEAP
requests against the server.  I'll be money that there's no problem.

  The LEAP module has NO race conditions possible by DESIGN.  The same goes
for the overlying EAP module.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-19 Thread Alan DeKok
"Jeremy Salch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created it again and this time it showed up as follows
...

  Which is exactly the same set of error messages.

> I couldn't seem to make it happen in -X mode.  Which makes things
> difficult.

  Try: radiusd -f

  Debug mode *with* threads.  See which modules are being executed,
and where the requests stop.  That's what the request numbers are for:
tracking the behaviour of the server for a particular request.


  Also, you still haven't explained if you're using databases which
could block.  Did you read my earlier message about my setup?

  Try a test setup: 12 names/passwords in the 'users' file, EAP &
LEAP, and *nothing* else in authorize or authenticate.  Run massive
amounts of LEAP requests against the server.  I'll be money that
there's no problem.

  The LEAP module has NO race conditions possible by DESIGN.  The same
goes for the overlying EAP module.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Paul Hampson
> From: Jeremy Salch
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 7:53 AM

> I created it again and this time it showed up as follows

> Error: Discarding new request from client GDC-T1-AP1:4370 - ID: 187 due to
> live request 78
> Fri Jul 18 16:44:55 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4371 - ID: 188 due to live request 79
> Fri Jul 18 16:44:56 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4388 - ID: 205 due to live request 96
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:00 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4370 - ID: 187 due to live request 78
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:00 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4371 - ID: 188 due to live request 79
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:01 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4388 - ID: 205 due to live request 96
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 6151) for
> request 78
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 7176) for
> request 79
> Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 8201) for
> request 96

> Whith 3 unresponsive children

> I couldn't seem to make it happen in -X mode.  Which makes things difficult.

> What does it mean that it happens in normal mode but not in -X mode>?

That it's a threading or timing problem. Try -fxxyz -l stdout (IE -X mode
without the -s for single threaded) and see if it happens.

If two threads deadlock, and a third hits that spot, it'll also wait
indefinately. I would expect that the longer it runs, the more child
threads would hit that spot and stick...

--
=
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Jeremy Salch
I created it again and this time it showed up as follows


Error: Discarding new request from client GDC-T1-AP1:4370 - ID: 187 due to
live request 78
Fri Jul 18 16:44:55 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4371 - ID: 188 due to live request 79
Fri Jul 18 16:44:56 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4388 - ID: 205 due to live request 96
Fri Jul 18 16:45:00 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4370 - ID: 187 due to live request 78
Fri Jul 18 16:45:00 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4371 - ID: 188 due to live request 79
Fri Jul 18 16:45:01 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4388 - ID: 205 due to live request 96
Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 6151) for
request 78
Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 7176) for
request 79
Fri Jul 18 16:45:28 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 8201) for
request 96

Whith 3 unresponsive children


I couldn't seem to make it happen in -X mode.  Which makes things difficult.

What does it mean that it happens in normal mode but not in -X mode>?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hampson
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3 


> From: Jeremy Salch
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 7:28 AM

> Well..  Actually. I spoke too soon.  I tried running all of the 
> clients through re-authentication again.. And after
> Having all 12 clients re-authenticate a couple of times   in a relatively
> short time I get the following

> Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [dwilson] (from client 
> GDC-T1-AP1 port 37 cli 000b4625d5de) Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: 
> Login OK: [chyne] (from client GDC-T1-AP1 port 12 cli 000943e586ae)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [jblack] (from client
GDC-T1-AP1
> port 21 cli 000af4e22599)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:22 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [coldwell] (from client
> GDC-T1-AP1 port 20 cli 000af4e2249b)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:25 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:26 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:30 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:31 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
> Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 8201)
for
> request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 9226)
for
> request 183

Yup, there's your processes locking, as Alan said

Does it happen in -X mode? The fact that it's always two children locking
suggests a deadlock somewhere, either one inside FreeRADIUS (urgh) or
something else... If it is a deadlock, -X won't trigger it. In that case,
you'll need to use the finer-grained debugging options, and not disable
threading in the process.

--
=
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Paul Hampson
> From: Jeremy Salch
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 7:28 AM

> Well..  Actually. I spoke too soon.  I tried running all of the clients
> through re-authentication again.. And after 
> Having all 12 clients re-authenticate a couple of times   in a relatively
> short time I get the following

> Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [dwilson] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
> port 37 cli 000b4625d5de)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [chyne] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
> port 12 cli 000943e586ae)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [jblack] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
> port 21 cli 000af4e22599)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:22 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [coldwell] (from client
> GDC-T1-AP1 port 20 cli 000af4e2249b)
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:25 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:26 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:30 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:25:31 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
> Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 8201) for
> request 160
> Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 9226) for
> request 183

Yup, there's your processes locking, as Alan said

Does it happen in -X mode? The fact that it's always two
children locking suggests a deadlock somewhere, either
one inside FreeRADIUS (urgh) or something else... If it
is a deadlock, -X won't trigger it. In that case, you'll
need to use the finer-grained debugging options, and not
disable threading in the process.

--
=
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Jeremy Salch
Well..  Actually. I spoke too soon.  I tried running all of the clients
through re-authentication again.. And after 
Having all 12 clients re-authenticate a couple of times   in a relatively
short time I get the following



Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [dwilson] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
port 37 cli 000b4625d5de)
Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [chyne] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
port 12 cli 000943e586ae)
Fri Jul 18 16:25:21 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [jblack] (from client GDC-T1-AP1
port 21 cli 000af4e22599)
Fri Jul 18 16:25:22 2003 : Auth: Login OK: [coldwell] (from client
GDC-T1-AP1 port 20 cli 000af4e2249b)
Fri Jul 18 16:25:25 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
Fri Jul 18 16:25:26 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
Fri Jul 18 16:25:30 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4251 - ID: 68 due to live request 160
Fri Jul 18 16:25:31 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
GDC-T1-AP1:4274 - ID: 91 due to live request 183
Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 8201) for
request 160
Fri Jul 18 16:26:40 2003 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child (id 9226) for
request 183

And one station wasn't able to login.





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco leap problem with pre3 


"Jeremy Salch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fri Jul 18 14:33:10 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client 
> GDC-T1-AP2:4849 - ID: 136 due to live request 88

  This has nothing to do with LEAP.

  Something is causing the server to block, and stop processing the request.
The client re-tries, and the server refuses to RE-process the same request,
because the first one isn't done...

  Find out wherewhy the server is stopping, and fix that.  LEAP will start
working again.

  I've been using LEAP regularly, and have had zero problems. However, I
don't run fancy DB's, files over NFS, or *anything* which could cause the
server to stop processing requests.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Jeremy Salch
 I think I found the problem.

A while back I posted a message about getting a error in threads.c  and I
was directed to 
Set max_requests_per_server to 0 to bypass the error.  I still had that
setting in use.
Upon removing that setting it seems to have started working properly


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco leap problem with pre3 


"Jeremy Salch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fri Jul 18 14:33:10 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client 
> GDC-T1-AP2:4849 - ID: 136 due to live request 88

  This has nothing to do with LEAP.

  Something is causing the server to block, and stop processing the request.
The client re-tries, and the server refuses to RE-process the same request,
because the first one isn't done...

  Find out wherewhy the server is stopping, and fix that.  LEAP will start
working again.

  I've been using LEAP regularly, and have had zero problems. However, I
don't run fancy DB's, files over NFS, or *anything* which could cause the
server to stop processing requests.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco leap problem with pre3

2003-07-18 Thread Alan DeKok
"Jeremy Salch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fri Jul 18 14:33:10 2003 : Error: Discarding new request from client
> GDC-T1-AP2:4849 - ID: 136 due to live request 88

  This has nothing to do with LEAP.

  Something is causing the server to block, and stop processing the
request.  The client re-tries, and the server refuses to RE-process
the same request, because the first one isn't done...

  Find out wherewhy the server is stopping, and fix that.  LEAP will
start working again.

  I've been using LEAP regularly, and have had zero problems.
However, I don't run fancy DB's, files over NFS, or *anything* which
could cause the server to stop processing requests.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP and FreeRadius

2003-05-29 Thread Miroslav Petricek
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:41:56PM +1000, Luke Walshe wrote:
> 
> > test  Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "pass",
> >   Service-Type = Framed-User
> 
> Try
> 
> test  Auth-Type := eap, User-Password == "pass"
>   Service-Type = Login-User
> 

It works. Thank you.

-- 
/* Miroslav Petricek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   UNIS COMPUTERS, spol. s r.o.  Systemovy inzenyr - UNIX
-- http://www.petricek.cz/ -- ICQ: 56183467  --

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Cisco LEAP and FreeRadius

2003-05-29 Thread Luke Walshe

> test  Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "pass",
>   Service-Type = Framed-User

Try

testAuth-Type := eap, User-Password == "pass"
Service-Type = Login-User

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Miroslav Petricek
> Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 8:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cisco LEAP and FreeRadius
> 
> 
> Hi, all
> 
> I would like to configure FreeRadius to allow LEAP based 
> authentication between Cisco client, Cisco AP350 ans FreeRadius 
> server.
> 
> My configuration:
> 
> freeradius-snapshot-20030528, compiled on Red Hat Linux 7.3
> 
> raddb/users file:
> 
> test  Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "pass",
>   Service-Type = Framed-User
> 
> 
> raddb/clients.conf file:
> 
> client 127.0.0.1 {
> secret  = pass
> shortname   = localhost
> nastype = other
> }
> 
> client 192.168.1.254 {
> secret  = pass
> shortname   = ap350
> nastype = cisco
> }
> 
> I have "default_eap_type = leap" in the "eap" section of the 
> radiusd.conf.
> 
> When I try to connect to the radius server, everything seems 
> to be working fine:
> 
> # radtest test pass localhost 1813 pass
> Sending Access-Request of id 100 to 127.0.0.1:1812
> User-Name = "test"
> User-Password = "pass"
> NAS-IP-Address = rambo.uniscomp.cz
> NAS-Port = 1813
> rad_recv: Access-Accept packet from host 127.0.0.1:1812, 
> id=100, length=32
> Service-Type = Framed-User
> Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.0
> 
> But when I try to connect from Cisco 350 NAS, i'm getting following:
> 
> Auth: Login OK: [test/] (from 
> client ap350 port 37 cli 000c304c1aa0)
> Info: rlm_eap_leap: No User-Password or NT-Password 
> configured for this user
> 
> How should I correctly specify User-Password?
> 
> -- 
> /* Miroslav Petricek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>UNIS COMPUTERS, spol. s r.o.  Systemovy inzenyr - UNIX
> -- http://www.petricek.cz/ -- ICQ: 56183467  --
> 
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> 

--
This email has been scanned
and protected by Inflex & Sophos
--
 

**
Privileged or confidential information is contained in this electronic
message.

If this message is not addressed to you, or if you are not responsible
for the delivery of this message to the addressee, you may not 
download, copy or forward this message to any other person. If you do
not immediately delete this message you may be liable for a breach of
confidentiality. We would be grateful if you would notify us of your 
receipt and deletion of this message.

It is your responsibility to maintain an up to date virus detection
system and to scan this message and any attachment to it for computer
viruses or other defects. If you download a file attached to this
message, you do so at your own risk.

In no circumstances does Radio Terminal Systems Pty Ltd accept
liability for any loss or damage (including any indirect or 
consequential losses) which may result, directly or indirectly, from
your receipt of this message or any attachment to it.
**


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP username and password in FreeRadius

2003-03-30 Thread Alan DeKok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  LEAP uses MS-CHAP for authentication.  As a result, it's impossible
> >to combine System authentication with LEAP.
...
> I`d like to know is this a "limitation" of freeradius or of the leap
> protocol ?

  It's a limitation of MS-CHAP, as I tried to point out.  See the FAQ
for more comments on CHAP.  FreeRADIUS didn't define MS-CHAP, so it is
NOT responsible for this problem.

> I think with Cisco Secure ACS you can utilize backend databases like Active
> Directory or LDAP , so is this only limited in freeradius and why ?

  Because LDAP and Active directory are not Unix system password
files.  Hint: The names are different!

  LEAP *can* do authentication with NT-Password hashes, because
they're part of the MS-CHAP protocol.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP username and password in FreeRadius

2003-03-30 Thread michael . kopp
>From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cisco LEAP username and password in FreeRadius 
>Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:32:01 -0500
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>david tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> User "dtran" also has a Unix account,"dtran", on the
>> FreeRadius Server and I would like to use that account
>> and password for Cisco LEAP instead of having to 
>> specify a different password in the users file. 
>
>  LEAP uses MS-CHAP for authentication.  As a result, it's impossible
>to combine System authentication with LEAP.
>
>  Alan DeKok.

Hi Alan, Hi Group

I`d like to know is this a "limitation" of freeradius or of the leap
protocol ?
I think with Cisco Secure ACS you can utilize backend databases like Active
Directory or LDAP , so is this only limited in freeradius and why ?

Michael

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP username and password in FreeRadius

2003-03-29 Thread Alan DeKok
david tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> User "dtran" also has a Unix account,"dtran", on the
> FreeRadius Server and I would like to use that account
> and password for Cisco LEAP instead of having to 
> specify a different password in the users file. 

  LEAP uses MS-CHAP for authentication.  As a result, it's impossible
to combine System authentication with LEAP.

  Alan DeKok.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP

2003-03-24 Thread FreeRadius
On Monday 24 March 2003 08:11 am, Alan DeKok wrote:
> David Tran II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am wondering if anyone get FreeRadius to work with Cisco LEAP.
> > I understand that LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary; however, I think I
> > saw a post in recent weeks that someone get it to work with Cisco
> > LEAP.  If you don't mind, can you share the configuration file and
> > what needed to be done?  I am currently using Freeradius 0.8.1
> > (stable version) running on RedHat linux version 7.3.
>
>   Read the main web page.  Cisco LEAP is only implemented in the
> current CVS head.
>
>   Once you download the CVS snapshot, read 'radiusd.conf', and look
> for 'leap'.  It will tell you what to do to configure it.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>

And yes it does seem to work great.



> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco LEAP

2003-03-24 Thread Alan DeKok
David Tran II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone get FreeRadius to work with Cisco LEAP.
> I understand that LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary; however, I think I 
> saw a post in recent weeks that someone get it to work with Cisco
> LEAP.  If you don't mind, can you share the configuration file and
> what needed to be done?  I am currently using Freeradius 0.8.1
> (stable version) running on RedHat linux version 7.3.

  Read the main web page.  Cisco LEAP is only implemented in the
current CVS head.

  Once you download the CVS snapshot, read 'radiusd.conf', and look
for 'leap'.  It will tell you what to do to configure it.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-23 Thread Alan DeKok
Lionel Gavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we use leap EAP type with md5 EAP type fixed as default_eap_type ?

  Not right now.  The EAP request doesn't specify which method it's
trying to use for authentication.  So the server has to pick ONE eap
method for ALL eap requests.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-21 Thread Lionel Gavage

Hello,

Le 20/03/03 13:00, « Alan DeKok » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> FreeRadius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Could I See your configuration files?   I can't seem to get it to work
> 
> You've got to set 'default_eap_type = leap'

Can we use leap EAP type with md5 EAP type fixed as default_eap_type ?

Or do we have to use one of them separately ?

Thanks.

Lionel.

> 
> Alan DeKok.
> 
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Lionel Gavage
Network Engineer (SeGI/ULg)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Tél: +32-4-3664845
Fax: +32-4-3662920
Bat. B26 SeGI 



-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-20 Thread Alan DeKok
FreeRadius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could I See your configuration files?   I can't seem to get it to work

  You've got to set 'default_eap_type = leap'

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-20 Thread FreeRadius
Could I See your configuration files?   I can't seem to get it to work



On Thursday 20 March 2003 07:06 am, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
> Hi
>
> > has anyone used cisco leap from CVS yet ?
>
> Yes, It is work fine!
>
> With my best regards, Dmitri.
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-20 Thread FreeRadius
Awesome!


On Thursday 20 March 2003 07:06 am, Dmitri Belimov wrote:
> Hi
>
> > has anyone used cisco leap from CVS yet ?
>
> Yes, It is work fine!
>
> With my best regards, Dmitri.
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: cisco leap

2003-03-20 Thread Dmitri Belimov
Hi

> has anyone used cisco leap from CVS yet ?
 
Yes, It is work fine!

With my best regards, Dmitri.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: CISCO LEAP

2002-11-15 Thread Jeremy Salch
On Thursday 14 November 2002 01:04 am, Lars Viklund wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 16:06, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 November 2002 06:52 pm, Mike Paneth wrote:
> > > We are about to setup a wireless network based on CISCO 1200 APs and
> > > need to control access.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know how to get Freeradius working with CISCO LEAP?
> >
> > It can't.
>
> Not yet anyway.
>
> > LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary EAP type to cisco..
>
> Yes.
>
> > you'll have to shell out the cash for this one.
>
> I don't think that's necessarily true. Someone just have to write a
> FreeRADIUS module for it. There are public descriptions of the protocol
> (http://www.missl.cs.umd.edu/wireless/ethereal/leap.txt) and it doesn't
> seem hard to implement.
>

At the moment it is, but I would love to see it in FreeRadius :-)



>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

-- 
http://tblx.net


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: CISCO LEAP

2002-11-14 Thread Alan DeKok
Jeremy Salch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to get Freeradius working with CISCO LEAP?
> 
>   It can't. . LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary EAP type to cisco..  you'll have to 
>shell
> out the cash for this one.  

  Either to buy Cisco's RADIUS server, or to pay someone to implement
LEAP in FreeRADIUS.

  Do a search on Google for LEAP and FreeRADIUS.  There's a web page
somewhere where LEAP is documented...

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: CISCO LEAP

2002-11-13 Thread Lars Viklund
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 16:06, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 November 2002 06:52 pm, Mike Paneth wrote:
> > We are about to setup a wireless network based on CISCO 1200 APs and need
> > to control access.
> >
> > Does anyone know how to get Freeradius working with CISCO LEAP?
> 
>   It can't.

Not yet anyway.

> LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary EAP type to cisco..  

Yes.

> you'll have to shell out the cash for this one.  

I don't think that's necessarily true. Someone just have to write a
FreeRADIUS module for it. There are public descriptions of the protocol
(http://www.missl.cs.umd.edu/wireless/ethereal/leap.txt) and it doesn't
seem hard to implement.



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: CISCO LEAP

2002-11-13 Thread Jeremy Salch
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 06:52 pm, Mike Paneth wrote:
> We are about to setup a wireless network based on CISCO 1200 APs and need
> to control access.
>
> Does anyone know how to get Freeradius working with CISCO LEAP?

It can't. . LEAP is a Cisco Proprietary EAP type to cisco..  you'll have to 
shell
out the cash for this one.  


>
> Mike Paneth
> Melbourne Australia

-- 
http://tblx.net


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: Cisco LEAP/EAP authentication

2002-07-03 Thread Alan DeKok

Jerry Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the current status of FreeRadius and
> Cisco Leap authentication??

  It's not implemented, and no one is working on it.

  As always, patches are welcome.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html