[Freesurfer] 5.3.0, mri_segstats
Dear experts, I updated FreeSurfer as a 5.3.0 version but have a problem about the missing ribbon.mgz when running recon-all procedure. I found the ftp address but couldn't find the mri_segstats. (ftp:/surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_segstats) Could you let me know the right address of the file? Best, EK. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] WM/GM boundary changes and control points
I've been struggling to upload the file to the ftp server, but failed in several times. Sorry for bothering you, but I will send an e-mail when the uploading is done. Best, EK 2012/10/14 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu I found EK_test.zip, but neither tar nor unzip knows how to uncomress it. What format is it? Or maybe it's corrupted... On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: Bruce, and other experts, thank you for your time :) I'm now uploading the data folder (before cp and after cp) to the freesurfer incoming directory. We obtained the 3D-SPGR axial images using 3T GE system which have 8HRBRAIN receiving coil. Data acquisition matrix is 320-by192, FOV is 200-by-200. Other parameters; slice thickness =1.5 TR=5.924 TE=1.472 Flip angle: 20 Inversion Time=400 Imaging Frequency 127.88 Percent Phase FOV =80 Sincerely, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Hi EK that is a really low-contrast image. Can you tell me about the acquisition parameters and resolution? Also, I can't diagnose your problem from just the volume I'll need the entire (tarred and gzipped) subject directory. Finally, please cc the list on these emails so that others can help you! Bruce On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I uploaded the files to transfer/incoming folder. Best, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu If you upload the subject to our FTP site I will take a look Bruce On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:29 PM, EK Kim kse...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your answer. I'm not sure I understand your question right, but I just processed the file using following procedures. 1. recon-all -autorecon1 -nuintensitycor-3T (because mine was 3T) 2. skullstripping brain mask using gcuts 3. adding control points (only on the left hemisphere) 4. recon-all -autorecon2-cp and this figure was made by a commnad line, [tkmedit wm.mgz -aux brain.mgz -surfs]. Best, EK. 2012/10/10 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu what was the name of the file that you transferred? On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I already uploaded this problem 2 days ago, reprocessing the subject to make sure about control points. However when I added the control points to the left hemisphere, the right hemisphere surface was changed severely. I used the command line, recon-all -autorecon2-cp -s subjectID. Could you tell me why does it occur and how to deal with it? Best, EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. __**_ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/** freesurfer https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] WM/GM boundary changes and control points
I uploaded the EK_test_new.tar file to the ftp incoming folder. I think it might work. Thank you for you time and consideration. 2012/10/15 EK Kim kse...@gmail.com I've been struggling to upload the file to the ftp server, but failed in several times. Sorry for bothering you, but I will send an e-mail when the uploading is done. Best, EK 2012/10/14 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu I found EK_test.zip, but neither tar nor unzip knows how to uncomress it. What format is it? Or maybe it's corrupted... On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: Bruce, and other experts, thank you for your time :) I'm now uploading the data folder (before cp and after cp) to the freesurfer incoming directory. We obtained the 3D-SPGR axial images using 3T GE system which have 8HRBRAIN receiving coil. Data acquisition matrix is 320-by192, FOV is 200-by-200. Other parameters; slice thickness =1.5 TR=5.924 TE=1.472 Flip angle: 20 Inversion Time=400 Imaging Frequency 127.88 Percent Phase FOV =80 Sincerely, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Hi EK that is a really low-contrast image. Can you tell me about the acquisition parameters and resolution? Also, I can't diagnose your problem from just the volume I'll need the entire (tarred and gzipped) subject directory. Finally, please cc the list on these emails so that others can help you! Bruce On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I uploaded the files to transfer/incoming folder. Best, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu If you upload the subject to our FTP site I will take a look Bruce On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:29 PM, EK Kim kse...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your answer. I'm not sure I understand your question right, but I just processed the file using following procedures. 1. recon-all -autorecon1 -nuintensitycor-3T (because mine was 3T) 2. skullstripping brain mask using gcuts 3. adding control points (only on the left hemisphere) 4. recon-all -autorecon2-cp and this figure was made by a commnad line, [tkmedit wm.mgz -aux brain.mgz -surfs]. Best, EK. 2012/10/10 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu what was the name of the file that you transferred? On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I already uploaded this problem 2 days ago, reprocessing the subject to make sure about control points. However when I added the control points to the left hemisphere, the right hemisphere surface was changed severely. I used the command line, recon-all -autorecon2-cp -s subjectID. Could you tell me why does it occur and how to deal with it? Best, EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. __**_ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/** freesurferhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] WM/GM boundary changes and control points
Bruce, and other experts, thank you for your time :) I'm now uploading the data folder (before cp and after cp) to the freesurfer incoming directory. We obtained the 3D-SPGR axial images using 3T GE system which have 8HRBRAIN receiving coil. Data acquisition matrix is 320-by192, FOV is 200-by-200. Other parameters; slice thickness =1.5 TR=5.924 TE=1.472 Flip angle: 20 Inversion Time=400 Imaging Frequency 127.88 Percent Phase FOV =80 Sincerely, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Hi EK that is a really low-contrast image. Can you tell me about the acquisition parameters and resolution? Also, I can't diagnose your problem from just the volume I'll need the entire (tarred and gzipped) subject directory. Finally, please cc the list on these emails so that others can help you! Bruce On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I uploaded the files to transfer/incoming folder. Best, EK 2012/10/11 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu If you upload the subject to our FTP site I will take a look Bruce On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:29 PM, EK Kim kse...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your answer. I'm not sure I understand your question right, but I just processed the file using following procedures. 1. recon-all -autorecon1 -nuintensitycor-3T (because mine was 3T) 2. skullstripping brain mask using gcuts 3. adding control points (only on the left hemisphere) 4. recon-all -autorecon2-cp and this figure was made by a commnad line, [tkmedit wm.mgz -aux brain.mgz -surfs]. Best, EK. 2012/10/10 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu what was the name of the file that you transferred? On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I already uploaded this problem 2 days ago, reprocessing the subject to make sure about control points. However when I added the control points to the left hemisphere, the right hemisphere surface was changed severely. I used the command line, recon-all -autorecon2-cp -s subjectID. Could you tell me why does it occur and how to deal with it? Best, EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. __**_ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurferhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] WM/GM boundary changes and control points
Thank you for your answer. I'm not sure I understand your question right, but I just processed the file using following procedures. 1. recon-all -autorecon1 -nuintensitycor-3T (because mine was 3T) 2. skullstripping brain mask using gcuts 3. adding control points (only on the left hemisphere) 4. recon-all -autorecon2-cp and this figure was made by a commnad line, [tkmedit wm.mgz -aux brain.mgz -surfs]. Best, EK. 2012/10/10 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu what was the name of the file that you transferred? On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, EK Kim wrote: I already uploaded this problem 2 days ago, reprocessing the subject to make sure about control points. However when I added the control points to the left hemisphere, the right hemisphere surface was changed severely. I used the command line, recon-all -autorecon2-cp -s subjectID. Could you tell me why does it occur and how to deal with it? Best, EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] anisotropic input data
Dear freesurfers, I wondered is it okay to analyze isotropic data which was converted to the anisotropic one. The original data has (0.390625, 0.390625, 1.5) mm size and (512, 512, 104) voxels. It obtained from 3T scanner. I know the Freesurfer recommend isotropic data (1,1,1)mm. Does it have any problem to use the data I just transformed? To do this, I rescaled the images and did bilinear interpolation to create an isotropic 8-bit version of images. Thanks for any help. EK ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] anisotropic input data
Thank you for the answer. But I still confuse to convert the data. Does this mean is it 'not okay' to convert the anisotropic data to the isotropic? Then should I analyze the original one? 2012년 5월 4일 금요일에 Bruce Fischlfis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu님이 작성: Hi EK it's an empirical question. That is *very* anisotropic, so I suspect that there will be unavoidable biases in things like thickness maps which will be more accurate in regions in which the folds happen to place the cortex in the high resolution plane. That said, if the CNR is good enough it will probably generate reasonable surfaces. cheers Bruce On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Dear freesurfers, I wondered is it okay to analyze isotropic data which was converted to the anisotropic one. The original data has (0.390625, 0.390625, 1.5) mm size and (512, 512, 104) voxels. It obtained from 3T scanner. I know the Freesurfer recommend isotropic data (1,1,1)mm. Does it have any problem to use the data I just transformed? To do this, I rescaled the images and did bilinear interpolation to create an isotropic 8-bit version of images. Thanks for any help. EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] anisotropic input data
Thank you, but again I think that there might be no internal convert in my data from the recon-all log files. The other data set I used had records about internal convert in their recon-all log file representing as (1 1 1)mm but this data was not. So I worry about whether correct internal convert was preprocessed or not. How can I confirm the processes? Sorry for bothering you. Thank you in advance. 2012년 5월 4일 금요일에 Bruce Fischlfis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu님이 작성: if you give it to recon-all it will convert it internally, so you don't need to convert it yourself On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Thank you for the answer. But I still confuse to convert the data. Does this mean is it 'not okay' to convert the anisotropic data to the isotropic? Then should I analyze the original one? 2012? 5?4?Bruce Fischlfis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?? ??: Hi EK it's an empirical question. That is *very* anisotropic, so I suspect that there will be unavoidable biases in things like thickness maps which will be more accurate in regions in which the folds happen to place the cortex in the high resolution plane. That said, if the CNR is good enough it will probably generate reasonable surfaces. cheers Bruce On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Dear freesurfers, I wondered is it okay to analyze isotropic data which was converted to the anisotropic one. The original data has (0.390625, 0.390625, 1.5) mm size and (512, 512, 104) voxels. It obtained from 3T scanner. I know the Freesurfer recommend isotropic data (1,1,1)mm. Does it have any problem to use the data I just transformed? To do this, I rescaled the images and did bilinear interpolation to create an isotropic 8-bit version of images. Thanks for any help. EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] anisotropic input data
Yes I found it :) Thank you for your help! Sincerely, EK. 2012/5/4 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu run: mri_info $SUBJECTS_DIR/$subject/mri/**orig.mgz and you should see that it is 1mm isotropic cheers Bruce On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Thank you, but again I think that there might be no internal convert in my data from the recon-all log files. The other data set I used had records about internal convert in their recon-all log file representing as (1 1 1)mm but this data was not. So I worry about whether correct internal convert was preprocessed or not. How can I confirm the processes? Sorry for bothering you. Thank you in advance. 2012? 5?4?Bruce Fischlfis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.**edufis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?? ??: if you give it to recon-all it will convert it internally, so you don't need to convert it yourself On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Thank you for the answer. But I still confuse to convert the data. Does this mean is it 'not okay' to convert the anisotropic data to the isotropic? Then should I analyze the original one? 2012? 5?4?Bruce Fischlfis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.**edufis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?? ??: Hi EK it's an empirical question. That is *very* anisotropic, so I suspect that there will be unavoidable biases in things like thickness maps which will be more accurate in regions in which the folds happen to place the cortex in the high resolution plane. That said, if the CNR is good enough it will probably generate reasonable surfaces. cheers Bruce On Fri, 4 May 2012, EK Kim wrote: Dear freesurfers, I wondered is it okay to analyze isotropic data which was converted to the anisotropic one. The original data has (0.390625, 0.390625, 1.5) mm size and (512, 512, 104) voxels. It obtained from 3T scanner. I know the Freesurfer recommend isotropic data (1,1,1)mm. Does it have any problem to use the data I just transformed? To do this, I rescaled the images and did bilinear interpolation to create an isotropic 8-bit version of images. Thanks for any help. EK The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] recon-all error (nu_correct problem)
Hello, Freesurfers, I got an error message when I trying to use recon-all function in freesurfer on the XUbuntu system installed on the VirtualBox on a Windows 7 machine. I searched the e-mailing list but I can't find any answers. My problem is related to the nu_correct and nu_estimate_np_and_em. However, nu_correct and nu_estimate_np_and_em were located to exact path (/home/virtualuser/freesurfer/mni/bin). echo $MNI_DATAPATH, echo $MNI_PERL5LIB showed exact path. In addition, I already tried to use fixup_mni_paths. Could anyone give me an advice for fixing up this problem? Thanks in advance. Cheers, EK error message! #@# Nu Intensity Correction Wed Feb 15 01:23:24 EST 2012 mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 /home/virtualuser/Desktop/DATA/30664304/mri /home/virtualuser/freesurfer/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 nIters 2 $Id: mri_nu_correct.mni,v 1.18 2011/03/02 20:16:39 nicks Exp $ Linux FreeSurfer 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Wed Feb 15 01:23:25 EST 2012 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@fishie (i686-pc-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 20:19:13 tmpdir is ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682 /home/virtualuser/Desktop/DATA/30664304/mri mri_convert orig.mgz ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu0.mnc -odt float mri_convert orig.mgz ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu0.mnc -odt float $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.1 2011/03/22 16:37:02 nicks Exp $ reading from orig.mgz... TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, 0) j_ras = (0, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 0) changing data type from uchar to float (noscale = 0)... writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu0.mnc... Iteration 1 Wed Feb 15 01:23:37 EST 2012 nu_correct -clobber ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu0.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu1.mnc -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/0/ [virtualuser@FreeSurfer:/home/virtualuser/Desktop/DATA/30664304/mri/] [2012-02-15 01:23:37] running: /home/virtualuser/freesurfer/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/0/ ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu0.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.17682/nu1.imp Assertion failed at line 827 in file templates/CachedArray.cc nu_estimate_np_and_em: crashed while running volume_stats (termination status=256) nu_correct: crashed while running nu_estimate_np_and_em (termination status=256) ERROR: nu_correct Linux FreeSurfer 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
