[Freesurfer] Subject: Re: Zero cortical thickness

2016-08-15 Thread A Nunes
Hi Douglas,

I meant a surface area extracted from a surface based atlas.

Thanks
Adonay
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Subject: Re: Zero cortical thickness

2016-08-16 Thread A Nunes
Hi

I looked at the distribution areas with almost zero thickness and when
I saw they were on one hemisphere, I checked my bash script and found
out that for the left cortex it was calling the right hemisphere
areas.
However, I still have a few subjects which have zero thickness in some
areas of my parcelled atlas. This zero thickness is it caused by a
segmentation or a sphere reconstruction error/imperfection (in which
case the value should be NaN), or is it capturing a brain structural
characteristic worth to account for?

Thanks
Adonay

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:06 PM, A Nunes  wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I meant a surface area extracted from a surface based atlas.
>
> Thanks
> Adonay
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Subject: Re: Zero cortical thickness

2016-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
please include previous correspondence. Do you mean the area of a vertex 
or the area of an ROI?

On 08/15/2016 06:06 PM, A Nunes wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I meant a surface area extracted from a surface based atlas.
>
> Thanks
> Adonay
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Subject: Re: Zero cortical thickness

2016-08-16 Thread A Nunes
I mean the area of an ROI

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Douglas N Greve
 wrote:
> please include previous correspondence. Do you mean the area of a vertex
> or the area of an ROI?
>
> On 08/15/2016 06:06 PM, A Nunes wrote:
>> Hi Douglas,
>>
>> I meant a surface area extracted from a surface based atlas.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Adonay
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
Hi

I looked at the distribution areas with almost zero thickness and when
I saw they were on one hemisphere, I checked my bash script and found
out that for the left cortex it was calling the right hemisphere
areas.
However, I still have a few subjects which have zero thickness in some
areas of my parcelled atlas. This zero thickness is it caused by a
segmentation or a sphere reconstruction error/imperfection (in which
case the value should be NaN), or is it capturing a brain structural
characteristic worth to account for?

Thanks
Adonay


Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:27:24 -0400
From: Douglas Greve 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Zero cortical thickness
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID: <8c1593aa-77fc-333e-e7d7-1901f9a39...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

what do you mean by "area"? do you mean one of the cortical ROIs or do
you mean a general location?


On 8/15/16 4:13 PM, A Nunes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read in the mailing list about zero cortical thickness, but I
> still have some doubts.
>
> I am calculating the average cortical thickness of some areas, and
> there are a few that almost all the subjects' thickness is zero,
> others only some subjects score zero. For the ones that almost all
> subjects is zero, I would guess is not considered cortical, however,
> all my areas are cortical.
>
> - If I compute a ttest against two groups, should I set the zeros as
> NaNs? or are the zero thickness meaningful (a genuine measure or a
> segmentation artifact)?
>
> -Should I use the -l ?h.cortex.label to avoid having zero thickness in
> some areas? If so, at which point? the commands used are:
>
> mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject subjid --hemi ?h
> --sval-annot fsaverage/label/?h.areas.annot --tval
> $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot
>
> mris_anatomical_stats -a
> $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot$SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot
>   -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/stats/?h.areas.stats -b  subjid ?h
>
>
> Thanks
> Adonay
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Subject: Re: Zero cortical thickness

2016-08-16 Thread Douglas N Greve
which ROIs are coming up zero? Have you looked at the area maps for that 
subject for that ROI?

On 08/16/2016 01:16 PM, A Nunes wrote:
> I mean the area of an ROI
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Douglas N Greve
>  wrote:
>> please include previous correspondence. Do you mean the area of a vertex
>> or the area of an ROI?
>>
>> On 08/15/2016 06:06 PM, A Nunes wrote:
>>> Hi Douglas,
>>>
>>> I meant a surface area extracted from a surface based atlas.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Adonay
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
> Hi
>
> I looked at the distribution areas with almost zero thickness and when
> I saw they were on one hemisphere, I checked my bash script and found
> out that for the left cortex it was calling the right hemisphere
> areas.
> However, I still have a few subjects which have zero thickness in some
> areas of my parcelled atlas. This zero thickness is it caused by a
> segmentation or a sphere reconstruction error/imperfection (in which
> case the value should be NaN), or is it capturing a brain structural
> characteristic worth to account for?
>
> Thanks
> Adonay
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:27:24 -0400
> From: Douglas Greve 
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Zero cortical thickness
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <8c1593aa-77fc-333e-e7d7-1901f9a39...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> what do you mean by "area"? do you mean one of the cortical ROIs or do
> you mean a general location?
>
>
> On 8/15/16 4:13 PM, A Nunes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have read in the mailing list about zero cortical thickness, but I
>> still have some doubts.
>>
>> I am calculating the average cortical thickness of some areas, and
>> there are a few that almost all the subjects' thickness is zero,
>> others only some subjects score zero. For the ones that almost all
>> subjects is zero, I would guess is not considered cortical, however,
>> all my areas are cortical.
>>
>> - If I compute a ttest against two groups, should I set the zeros as
>> NaNs? or are the zero thickness meaningful (a genuine measure or a
>> segmentation artifact)?
>>
>> -Should I use the -l ?h.cortex.label to avoid having zero thickness in
>> some areas? If so, at which point? the commands used are:
>>
>> mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject subjid --hemi ?h
>> --sval-annot fsaverage/label/?h.areas.annot --tval
>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot
>>
>> mris_anatomical_stats -a
>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot$SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/label/?h.areas.annot
>>-f $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/stats/?h.areas.stats -b  subjid ?h
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Adonay
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.