Re: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

2012-11-08 Thread Zheng Hui
Hi Doug, I sum all structures except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem in order to compare with SubCortGrayVol. Even the former includes some white matter structures and all subcortical structures, it is smaller compared to SubCortGrayVol.My original question is about calculating the total cerebral volumes, when I foundCortexVol  CorticalWhiteMatterVol  SubCortGrayVol is much bigger thanCortexVol  CorticalWhiteMatterVol  Sum(all structures (after ICV inthe list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem).Hope I explained it better this time.Cheers,Zheng HuiOn 11/6/12 2:14 AM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:Hi Zheng, there is something wrong with your math. When I sum up all the columns in your table from Left-Lateral-Ventricle to CC_Anterior, I get 215952 for the first row (you get only 67548). Can you double check your calculations?dougOn 10/28/2012 11:53 PM, Zheng Hui wrote: Forgot to attach the excel file. Sorry for that. From: zhenghui zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg  mailto:zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg Date: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:52 AM To: Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume. Hi Doug, Thanks for replying. But our datasets do showed that Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF,  cerebellum and brainstem) is much smaller SubCortGrayVol. The former  is only about 30-40% of the later. We are using FS 5.1.0 without the  SupraTentorialVol fix.I attached the aseg file for your reference (the  last three columns in the sheet). Thanks, Zheng Hui On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:   Hi freesurfer,   We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes  cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use   CortexVol  CorticalWhiteMatterVol  SubCortGrayVol  Or  CortexVol  CorticalWhiteMatterVol  Sum(all structures (after ICV in  the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem) This should give very close to the same value. I don't think it makes a difference.Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol.  To re-run the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other  than recon-all –long tpN baseID –segstats and does it affect any  other structure or just SupraTentorialVol? It should not affect other structures. doug-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.MGH-NMR Centergr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduPhone Number: 617-724-2358Fax: 617-726-7422Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReportingFileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.htmlThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it isaddressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mailcontains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in errorbut does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properlydispose of the e-mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

2012-11-08 Thread Douglas N Greve

Can you send me the aseg.stats file for a single subject where you are 
seeing this effect?
doug


On 11/08/2012 03:45 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:
 Hi Doug,  I sum all structures except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and 
 brainstem in order to compare with SubCortGrayVol. Even the former 
 includes some white matter structures and all subcortical structures, 
 it is smaller compared to SubCortGrayVol.

 My original question is about calculating the total cerebral volumes, 
 when I found *CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol* is 
 much bigger than *CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all 
 structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum 
 and brainstem)*.

 Hope I explained it better this time.

 Cheers,
 Zheng Hui

 On 11/6/12 2:14 AM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Hi Zheng, there is something wrong with your math. When I sum up
 all the
 columns in your table from Left-Lateral-Ventricle to CC_Anterior,
 I get
 215952 for the first row (you get only 67548). Can you double
 check your
 calculations?
 doug

 On 10/28/2012 11:53 PM, Zheng Hui wrote:

 Forgot to attach the excel file. Sorry for that.

 From: zhenghui zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg
 mailto:zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg
 mailto:zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg
 mailto:zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg%3E
 Date: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:52 AM
 To: Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E
 Subject: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

 Hi Doug,

 Thanks for replying. But our datasets do showed that
 Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF,
 cerebellum and brainstem) is much smaller SubCortGrayVol. The
 former
 is only about 30-40% of the later. We are using FS 5.1.0
 without the
 SupraTentorialVol fix.I attached the aseg file for your
 reference (the
 last three columns in the sheet).

 Thanks,
 Zheng Hui

 On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:
 
  Hi freesurfer,
 
  We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which
 excludes
 cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do
 we use
 
  CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol
  Or
  CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures
 (after ICV in
 the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem)
 This should give very close to the same value. I don't think
 it makes a
 difference.
 
 
  Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for
 SupraTentorialVol.
 To re-run the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra
 step other
 than recon-all –long tpN baseID –segstats and does it affect
 any
 other structure or just SupraTentorialVol?
 It should not affect other structures.
 doug


 -- 
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html



 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
 whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
 the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
 you in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the
 sender and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.



-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

2012-11-05 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Zheng, there is something wrong with your math. When I sum up all the 
columns in your table from Left-Lateral-Ventricle to CC_Anterior, I get 
215952 for the first row (you get only 67548). Can you double check your 
calculations?
doug

On 10/28/2012 11:53 PM, Zheng Hui wrote:
 Forgot to attach the excel file. Sorry for that.

 From: zhenghui zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg 
 mailto:zheng@duke-nus.edu.sg
 Date: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:52 AM
 To: Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Subject: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

 Hi Doug,

 Thanks for replying. But our datasets do showed that
 Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, 
 cerebellum and brainstem) is much smaller SubCortGrayVol. The former 
 is only about 30-40% of the later. We are using FS 5.1.0 without the 
 SupraTentorialVol fix.I attached the aseg file for your reference (the 
 last three columns in the sheet).

 Thanks,
 Zheng Hui

 On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:
 
  Hi freesurfer,
 
  We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes 
 cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use
 
  CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol
  Or
  CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in 
 the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem)
 This should give very close to the same value. I don't think it makes a
 difference.
 
 
  Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol. 
 To re-run the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other 
 than recon-all –long tpN baseID –segstats and does it affect any 
 other structure or just SupraTentorialVol?
 It should not affect other structures.
 doug

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

2012-10-24 Thread Zheng Hui


Hi freesurfer,

We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes cerebellum, 
brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use

CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol
Or
CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) 
except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem)


Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol. To re-run 
the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other than recon-all 
–long tpN baseID –segstats and does it affect any other structure or just 
SupraTentorialVol?

Thank you,
Zheng Hui

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.

2012-10-24 Thread Douglas N Greve


On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:

 Hi freesurfer,

 We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes 
 cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use

 CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol
 Or
 CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in the 
 list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem)
This should give very close to the same value. I don't think it makes a 
difference.


 Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol. To re-run 
 the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other than recon-all 
 –long tpN baseID –segstats and does it affect any other structure or just 
 SupraTentorialVol?
It should not affect other structures.
doug

 Thank you,
 Zheng Hui

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] Total Cerebral Volume

2006-10-26 Thread Anil Roy
Hello everyone,Can someone please point out where freesurfer outputs the total cerebral volume (white + gray).Thanks,Anil.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Total Cerebral Volume

2006-10-26 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Anil,

you can just add up the relevant classes in the aseg.stats file

Bruce

On Thu, 26 
Oct 2006, Anil Roy wrote:



Hello everyone,

Can someone please point out where freesurfer outputs the total cerebral
volume (white + gray).

Thanks,

Anil.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer