Re: [Freeswitch-users] looking for qualified and cheap TISP

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hi!

Callcentric 
 
offers a package called IP Freedom 
. It costs nothing and will 
allow you to test FS.


Carlos

Erwin Davis wrote:
Hi, I installed internal freeSWITCH in my LAN and want to see if I can 
dial out / dial in. Could anyone suggest one Telephone Service 
provider which is capable of connecting with FreeSWITCH and CHEAP/even 
FREE if possible? At this moment, I want to prove it is working with 
the real outside world. Thanks,


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[Freeswitch-users] Late codec negotiation: any drawbacks?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hello!

As I have a fax machine connected to an adapter that does T.38 
(Grandstream HandyTone 502), I am playing with late codec negotiation 
and proxy media. However, because late codec negotiation is a 
profile-wide affair, I would like to know if there are any potential 
drawbacks I should be aware of.

Thanks!

Carlos

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] How can I make more sounds that sound like "Callie"?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

http://www.gmvoices.com

She appears to be a real person! :)

Nick Lemberger wrote:
> I'm guessing she's a Cepstral voice, but can I ask what version, khz and 
> settings the 8khz sounds are recorded with (I ask about the khz because 
> perhaps they were pre-transcoded)?  I tried downloading 5.1 from Cepstral but 
> they don't sound at all alike.  I'd like to replace a few prompts with words 
> more accurate for my installation but I'm having trouble getting close to the 
> default voice.
>   


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Brian,

You've been vindicated. Callcentric is now advertising zero weighted SRV 
records! :)


I've re-enabled SRV lookups for the Callcentric profile and will monitor 
to see if I get any errors.


Carlos

Brian West wrote:
Or as I have argued today they should fix their SRV records to be zero  
weighted.


/b

On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Michael Jerris wrote:

  

You can bypass the srv records if you like by passing a :port with the
hostname where you use it in freeswitch.




___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

  
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Who is "callie"?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Mike,

Sure! I am planning on doing a session "soon", maybe in a couple of 
weeks or so. My only question is whether GM Voices license will allow 
this kind of thing. Do you or anyone else know?


Carlos

Michael Jerris wrote:
Also, note, we have a few sound files we would like to add to our 
default set.  If you are doing a session anyways and are willing 
please let me know if we can throw a few other prompts in your list to 
be recorded.


Mike

On Aug 27, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Michael Collins wrote:




On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Carlos S. Antunes <mailto:c...@nowthor.com>> wrote:


Hi!

I searched the wiki but couldn't find the answer. Is "callie" a real
woman one may ask to record additional sounds?


"Callie" is one of the voices from GM Voices. She is definitely 
available for custom work. Visit www.gmvoices.com 
<http://www.gmvoices.com/> for more info. Tell them that the 
FreeSWITCH project sent you. :)

-MC
 



Thanks!

Carlos

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/>


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org 
<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>

http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
  
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[Freeswitch-users] Who is "callie"?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hi!

I searched the wiki but couldn't find the answer. Is "callie" a real 
woman one may ask to record additional sounds?

Thanks!

Carlos

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Anthony Minessale wrote:
> did you see my other email on this thread with the xml macro idea?
> When it comes to displacing the complexity there are many choices.

Yes, I did see that macro idea. It looks indeed very good in the case of 
a failover scenario. But what about something like I proposed initially, 
that is, a mix of simultaneous and sequential dialing in arbitrary 
order? I guess this is also what Phillip Jones is after with his feature 
request (http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FSCORE-422).

In any case, I am going to adopt your solution for the failover scenario 
as the most elegant so far! :)

> if you want to make some api call that can look in xml and generate a 
> big | sep dial string that's entirely possible. you could do something 
> similar with lua or some other embedded language as well.

Yes, that is indeed another possibility. However, I am not sure it would 
allow that mix of simultaneous and sequential dialing, would it?

Carlos

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Anthony Minessale wrote:
> Unfortunately it's still a problem because the core bridge/originate 
> mechanism does not parse XML it's only parses the dial string markup. 

Wouldn't it be possible to "translate" the markup to a dial string prior 
to hitting the core mechanism?

> In the end you must end up with one string of application and one 
> string of data.
>

How about something like

 ... 

being somewhat* equivalent to

?

(* somewhat to be properly define later)

> I am very strict about maintaining scope boundaries between abstract 
> concepts.  I think it's the number 1 breakdown that led to asterisk 
> getting so messed up over the years and I want to avoid that same plague.

I totally agree with you on this.

> I hope you understand and if you want to continue to ponder some more 
> functionality I welcome it.

Don't worry, I rarely stop having ideas. Feel free to shoot them down at 
will! :)

Carlos


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Anthony,

Yes, you are right, I was thinking strictly in terms of SIP gateways. I 
guess that instead on the tag "gateway", one could use "channel"? For 
example:



  
  
  
  
  
  
  


Would this be acceptable to you?

Regarding the combinations of continue_on_fail and hangup_after bridge, 
I'll give that a try although I suspect it will result in less 
structured and harder to understand markup...


Thanks!

Carlos

Anthony Minessale wrote:

This suggestion violates the scope boundaries.

gateways are specific concept to mod_sofia so a  tag in 
 (part of agnostic xml dialplan)

does not flow properly.

you can also use combinations of continue_on_fail and hangup_after 
bridge so you can

just put each bridge statement in it's own action.


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Carlos S. Antunes <mailto:c...@nowthor.com>> wrote:


Max,

I would like to see something similar too. For example, it would be
wonderful if one could specify multiple gateways to try like this or
something similar:


   
   
   
   
   
   
   


One would be able to avoid the "[]" and "{}" hacks and combine
sequential and simultaneous trying of gateways.

What do the developers think of this?

Carlos

Max Ivanov wrote:
> Nowdays I 'm forced to put multiple "|" to find first free
gateway, ie
>

sofia/gateway/panas111/1000|sofia/gateway/panas112/1000|sofia/gateway/panas113/1000
> ,
> the whole sting is tooo long, is there any shorter way to write
same thing? Like
> "sofia/gateway/panas*/1000" will try all gateways matching the
pattern.
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com 
<mailto:msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com>
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com 
<mailto:paypal%3aanthony.miness...@gmail.com>

IRC: irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org 
<mailto:sip%3a...@conference.freeswitch.org>
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 
<http://iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888>
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org 
<mailto:googletalk%3aconf%2b...@conference.freeswitch.org>

pstn:213-799-1400


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
  
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Max,

I would like to see something similar too. For example, it would be 
wonderful if one could specify multiple gateways to try like this or 
something similar:











One would be able to avoid the "[]" and "{}" hacks and combine 
sequential and simultaneous trying of gateways.

What do the developers think of this?

Carlos

Max Ivanov wrote:
> Nowdays I 'm forced to put multiple "|" to find first free gateway, ie
> sofia/gateway/panas111/1000|sofia/gateway/panas112/1000|sofia/gateway/panas113/1000
> ,
> the whole sting is tooo long, is there any shorter way to write same thing? 
> Like
> "sofia/gateway/panas*/1000" will try all gateways matching the pattern.
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>   

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Raymond Chandler wrote:


On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote:


Raymond Chandler wrote:

On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote:

Hmm, where does it say that, after the lookup, one cannot use the same
IP address as before? :)


Section 4 of RFC3263 as quoted in my first email

"The procedures here MUST be done exactly once per transaction, 
where transaction is as defined in [1]. 
"




Raymond, sure. But do the "procedures here" preclude one from 
choosing the same host given that both the priorities and weights are 
the same for all the hosts?



well, not exactly, in fact... every so often, you will end up choosing 
the same 1 out of 4 hosts twice in a row at random


Exactly! :)


but the procedures basically say to choose one at random


Right, but isn't the generator pseudo-random, instead? (If one takes 
"random" literally, pseudo-random would violate the spec!) What prevents 
one from using the "right" pseudo-random generator?





That said, I'm really just about done with this thread since I don't 
personally agree with the spec in this case anyway since stale nonce 
checking makes sense to avoid replay attacks, etc.  Although, I 
haven't looked at the specs to see if checking for stale nonces breaks 
any specs... that might be an interesting search ;-)




I am going to try to find an appropriate IETF mailing list to ask some 
questions about this random SRV stuff and will repost here once I have 
some additional info.


Thanks for trying to keep me honest, though! :)

Carlos Antunes
Nowthor Corporation

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Raymond Chandler wrote:

On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote:

Hmm, where does it say that, after the lookup, one cannot use the same
IP address as before? :)


Section 4 of RFC3263 as quoted in my first email

"The procedures here MUST be done exactly once per transaction, where 
transaction is as defined in [1]. 
"




Raymond, sure. But do the "procedures here" preclude one from choosing 
the same host given that both the priorities and weights are the same 
for all the hosts?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Raymond Chandler wrote:
> Actually, disregard my previous mail... this patch probably wouldn't  
> be gladly accepted... I seem to have forgotten about the part where  
> the DNS SRV lookup "MUST be done once per transaction"
>
>   

Hmm, where does it say that, after the lookup, one cannot use the same 
IP address as before? :)

Carlos Antunes
Nowthor Corporation


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Raymond Chandler wrote:
very true, but i've been reading over the RFCs on this, and it seems 
that FreeSWITCH isn't doing anything incorrectly.


in RFC3263 (section 4), when talking about client usage of SRV:
The procedures here MUST be done exactly once per transaction, where transaction is as defined in [1]. 
[1] being RFC3261


in RFC3261 (section 8.1.3.5), when talking about 4xx responses:
In all of the above cases, the request is retried by creating a new
   request with the appropriate modifications.  This new request
   constitutes a new transaction and SHOULD have the same value of the
   Call-ID, To, and From of the previous request, but the CSeq should
   contain a new sequence number that is one higher than the previous.



I'd say that based on my own and brief perusal of the relevant RFC's, 
you are right that Freeswitch is operating without violating the specs. 
Therefore, there is no bug in Freeswitch.






Is there a way to make Freeswitch behave
differently?

disable-srv on the profile



In Callcentric's case, it doesn't help either. A request for 'A' recods 
for 'callcentric.com' returns a bunch. The only way appears to select 
and stick with only one.


All that said, if it has to be a "bug", then it seems to me that it's 
more of a "bug" in callcentric's service. They'd probably be better of 
actually prioritizing their SRV records. If they want load balancing 
and want to do checking for stale nonces, then they should be sharing 
nonces across all of their proxies or using a proper load balancer.




Agreed. That being said, having a way to force Freeswitch to stick to 
the same IP address in the middle of authorization/authentication 
wouldn't violate any specs but would certainly make things easier when 
dealing with not so well implemented round robin scenarios. Do you think 
a new option could be added to Freeswitch to achieve round robin 
avoidance in these cases?


Thanks!

Carlos Antunes
Nowthor Corporation

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[Freeswitch-users] Authorizations when using DNS SRV bug?

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hello!

I am using Callcentric for my tests and have observed what appears to me 
a possible bug in the way Freeswitch handles DNS SRV records.

Callcentric uses DNS SRV records as a way to direct traffic to their SIP 
server. A 'srv' 'dig' of '_sip._udp.callcentric.com' returns:

_sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 
alpha6.callcentric.com.
_sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 
alpha7.callcentric.com.
_sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 
alpha1.callcentric.com.
_sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 
alpha3.callcentric.com.

Based on this information, Freeswitch appears to correctly round robin 
all available IP addresses except in a particular situation: in the 
middle of authorizations.

For example, in a registration, Freeswitch send a packet to 
alpha1.callcentric.com. Callcentric then challenges Freeswitch with a 
Proxy Authorization request. Freeswitch then sends the packet with the 
requested credentials but not necessarily to alpha1.callcentric.com! In 
many cases, instead of sticking to the 'challenging' server, Freeswitch 
round robins and sends the second packet to, one of the other servers. 
This continues for a little while and eventually, simply by luck, the 
second packet is sent to the 'challenging' Callcentric server.

Shouldn't Freeswitch stick to the same server when challenged for 
credentials? Is this a bug? Is there a way to make Freeswitch behave 
differently?

Thanks!

Carlos Antunes
Nowthor Corporation




___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] bind_server_ip issue

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Thanks, Brian. If you don't mind my asking, what is the ultimate purpose 
of local_ip_v4, then?


Brian West wrote:
Don't use local_ip_v4 then... please hard code the param in the sofia  
profile because the value of local_ip_v4 can change.


/b

On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote:

  

Hi Brian!

Thank you for your quick response. I ended up defining "local_ip_v4"  
at the top of vars.xml and set "bind_server_ip" to "local_ip_v4" as  
well. Is this the best way to go about selecting an IP address for  
FS to bind to?


In any case, even though it doesn't appear to affect operation, I am  
still getting this "IP change detected" somewhat periodically in my  
logs (running 1.0.4):




___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

  
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] bind_server_ip issue

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hi Brian!

Thank you for your quick response. I ended up defining "local_ip_v4" at 
the top of vars.xml and set "bind_server_ip" to "local_ip_v4" as well. 
Is this the best way to go about selecting an IP address for FS to bind to?


In any case, even though it doesn't appear to affect operation, I am 
still getting this "IP change detected" somewhat periodically in my logs 
(running 1.0.4):


2009-08-14 01:30:21.215446 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 01:30:22.930551 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:00:21.226791 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:00:22.473798 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:10:21.255298 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:10:22.730414 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:20:21.279193 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:20:22.946537 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:30:21.297964 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:30:23.111418 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:40:21.333952 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:40:23.282789 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 02:50:21.362973 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 02:50:22.530569 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 03:20:21.409806 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 03:20:22.137788 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 03:30:21.414786 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 03:30:23.390800 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 03:50:21.422794 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 03:50:22.709792 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 04:00:21.422789 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 04:00:22.818539 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 05:00:21.2953 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 05:00:22.19405 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 05:10:21.29951 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 05:10:23.266294 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 05:50:21.98300 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 05:50:21.962418 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 06:00:21.125959 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 06:00:22.182413 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 06:50:21.238928 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 06:50:23.138401 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 07:00:21.246302 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.4]->[172.24.0.5] []->[]
2009-08-14 07:00:23.269782 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]
2009-08-14 08:00:21.373961 [INFO] mod_sofia.c:3232 IP change detected 
[172.24.0.5]->[172.24.0.4] []->[]
2009-08-14 08:00:22.503561 [NOTICE] sofia.c:1508 Adding Alias 
[172.24.0.5] for profile [internal]


Thanks!

Carlos

Brian West wrote:

If you read the latest vars.xml I have clarified this:

   
   


So you'll need to open up the sip profile in sip_profiles and set the  
bind ip to exactly what you want.


Thanks,
Brian


On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote:

  

Hello!

First of all, I would like to express my thanks to all the  
developers of

Freeswitch.

I am testing Freeswitch on a Debian machine with physical network
interface with four virtual IP addresses. One of these IP addresses,
aliased as eth0:3, has been created specifically for Freeswitch.  I  
then

set bind_server_ip with the IP addresses associated with eth0:3. To my
surprise, however, tow things happen more or less randomly: 1) in
certain cases, Freeswitch binds to eth0:

[Freeswitch-users] bind_server_ip issue

[Carlos S. Antunes]

Hello!

First of all, I would like to express my thanks to all the developers of 
Freeswitch.

I am testing Freeswitch on a Debian machine with physical network 
interface with four virtual IP addresses. One of these IP addresses, 
aliased as eth0:3, has been created specifically for Freeswitch.  I then 
set bind_server_ip with the IP addresses associated with eth0:3. To my 
surprise, however, tow things happen more or less randomly: 1) in 
certain cases, Freeswitch binds to eth0:2 instead (with a different IP 
address); and in another, although Freeswitch binds initially to eth0:3, 
after a few hours it changes its mind and rebinds to eth0:2. Is this an 
issue with bind_server_ip or am I missing some configuration detail?

Thanks!

Carlos

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org