Re: [Freevo-users] record command
do you do that as part of the mencoder command? or is that done seperately vi a aumix? Thanks Dave On 10/16/2003, "Michael Ruelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Make sure you are setting the recording input right. By default it is set to >micin. You have to change it to linein. You can do that with a '-i R' or '-l >R' in addition to turning on audio with a '-i 80' or '-l 80' > >You cannot combine the two into one. so you must do something like >'aumix -i 80 -i R' or use -l not sure which one. > >On Wednesday 15 October 2003 20:12, Dave Smylie wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've been trying to get recording to work, and i'm pretty sure my record >> command is broken. By playing with it on the command line, I can get >> this to record picture, but it has no sound - (sound works fine when >> watching tv). I'm using a composite input, with the sound comingo ut of >> the tv card and going into the line-in on the sound card. >> >> I've checked in aumix and everything is turned up - does anyone know >> where I'm going wrong? >> >> Cheers >> Dave >> >> /usr/bin/mencoder -tv >> on:driver=v4l:input=0:norm=PAL:input=2:width=320:height=240:outfm t=yv12:dev >>ice=/dev/video0:adevice=/dev/dsp:audiorate=32000:forceaudio:forcechan =1:buff >>ersize=64 -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=1200:keyint=30 -oac >> mp3lame -lameopts br=128:cbr:mode=3 -ffourcc divx -endpos 1064 -o >> /mnt/40gig/b.avi >> >> >> >> --- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >> ___ >> Freevo-users mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > >-- >Mike Ruelle >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://world.std.com/~mruelle/ > > >--- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >___ >Freevo-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: Re: [Freevo-users] Setup Error
It's in CVS; I can't speak to the RPMs, you may have to ask the maintainer. On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:56:40PM -0400, Mike LeVan wrote: > > Hmmm. I don't have that file. Where can I get one? > > Mike > > > -Original Message- > From: Aubin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > In 1.4rc1, you should copy local_conf.py.example to local_conf.py; > leave freevo_config alone as it's different from the local_conf. > > Aubin > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > Inbound e-mail scanned by McAfee WebShield e500 v2.5-HF 3 > > > > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: Re: [Freevo-users] Setup Error
I had to ask about it too. I think it is stored in usr/share/doc/freevo/ - Original Message - From: "Mike LeVan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 6:56 PM Subject: Re: Re: [Freevo-users] Setup Error > > Hmmm. I don't have that file. Where can I get one? > > Mike > > > -Original Message- > From: Aubin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > In 1.4rc1, you should copy local_conf.py.example to local_conf.py; > leave freevo_config alone as it's different from the local_conf. > > Aubin > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > Inbound e-mail scanned by McAfee WebShield e500 v2.5-HF 3 > > > > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: Re: [Freevo-users] Setup Error
Hmmm. I don't have that file. Where can I get one? Mike -Original Message- From: Aubin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In 1.4rc1, you should copy local_conf.py.example to local_conf.py; leave freevo_config alone as it's different from the local_conf. Aubin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users Inbound e-mail scanned by McAfee WebShield e500 v2.5-HF 3 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] Setup Error
Hi all, I have had a hard time setting up recording in version 1.3.4, so I decided to try to set up version 1.4rc1. I used the RPM's from the sourceforge site. I copied the freevo_config.py to local_config.py and added in the TV channels. I ran freevo's setup and got the following: cdparanoia = ./runtime/apps/cdparanoia chanlist = us-cable display = x11 geometry = 800x600 jpegtran = ./runtime/apps/jpegtran lame = ./runtime/apps/lame mplayer = /usr/bin/mplayer oggenc = ./runtime/apps/oggenc renice = /usr/bin/renice setterm = /usr/bin/setterm tv = ntsc version = 2.1 Now, when I try to run freevo, I get the following error: == ERROR: The version information in freevo_config.py does't match the version in /etc/freevo/freevo.conf. please rerun "freevo setup" to generate a new freevo.conf You are using version 2.1, changes since then: The changelist has not been updated, please notify the developers! == I have read through the files, and I am not quite sure what I need to change in either the freevo_config or local_config files. I feel that this must be obvious, but I am a bit of a freevo newb, so I am a little hesitant to really mess with the code too much. I have tried to alter this line: FREEVO_CONF_VERSION = setup_freevo.CONFIG_VERSION To this: FREEVO_CONF_VERSION = 2.1 But I still get the same error. Thanks for the help, Mike --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] Setup Error
Hi all, I have had a hard time setting up recording in version 1.3.4, so I decided to try to set up version 1.4rc1. I used the RPM's from the sourceforge site. I copied the freevo_config.py to local_config.py and added in the TV channels. I ran freevo's setup and got the following: cdparanoia = ./runtime/apps/cdparanoia chanlist = us-cable display = x11 geometry = 800x600 jpegtran = ./runtime/apps/jpegtran lame = ./runtime/apps/lame mplayer = /usr/bin/mplayer oggenc = ./runtime/apps/oggenc renice = /usr/bin/renice setterm = /usr/bin/setterm tv = ntsc version = 2.1 Now, when I try to run freevo, I get the following error: == ERROR: The version information in freevo_config.py does't match the version in /etc/freevo/freevo.conf. please rerun "freevo setup" to generate a new freevo.conf You are using version 2.1, changes since then: The changelist has not been updated, please notify the developers! == I have read through the files, and I am not quite sure what I need to change in either the freevo_config or local_config files. I feel that this must be obvious, but I am a bit of a freevo newb, so I am a little hesitant to really mess with the code too much. I have tried to alter this line: FREEVO_CONF_VERSION = setup_freevo.CONFIG_VERSION To this: FREEVO_CONF_VERSION = 2.1 But I still get the same error. Thanks for the help, Mike --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Setup Error
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:39:06PM -0400, Mike LeVan wrote: > I used the RPM's from the sourceforge site. I copied > the freevo_config.py to local_config.py and added in the > TV channels. In 1.4rc1, you should copy local_conf.py.example to local_conf.py; leave freevo_config alone as it's different from the local_conf. Aubin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] G400 TV-Out
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 00:36, Mike Heanssgen wrote: > Just got my new G400 TV-Out card for my Freevo box. Anyone else using this > card? What kind of setup issues (if any) have you had? This is probably the most popular card on this list. I use it and me issues were arround redhat 8, and it not using a standard kernel, my recomendation would be to download the lastes kernel and use that.. > P.S. I also have a Sigma Designs Netstream 2000/TV card that does component > YPbPr at native 1920/1080i resolutions but I'm having some probs with that > under Redhat9 since the "open source" drivers that Sigma provides are not so > open source (limited) and they've stopped development at kernel 2.4.19. Rh9 > uses kernel 2.4.20. Anyone else have this card as well? --- this is > probably very rare since it's a specialty card... I used to have a Hollywood Plus. Check out dxr3.sourceforge.net. Maybe there are some similarities. Mike > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] record command
Make sure you are setting the recording input right. By default it is set to micin. You have to change it to linein. You can do that with a '-i R' or '-l R' in addition to turning on audio with a '-i 80' or '-l 80' You cannot combine the two into one. so you must do something like 'aumix -i 80 -i R' or use -l not sure which one. On Wednesday 15 October 2003 20:12, Dave Smylie wrote: > Hi > > I've been trying to get recording to work, and i'm pretty sure my record > command is broken. By playing with it on the command line, I can get > this to record picture, but it has no sound - (sound works fine when > watching tv). I'm using a composite input, with the sound comingo ut of > the tv card and going into the line-in on the sound card. > > I've checked in aumix and everything is turned up - does anyone know > where I'm going wrong? > > Cheers > Dave > > /usr/bin/mencoder -tv > on:driver=v4l:input=0:norm=PAL:input=2:width=320:height=240:outfmt=yv12:dev >ice=/dev/video0:adevice=/dev/dsp:audiorate=32000:forceaudio:forcechan=1:buff >ersize=64 -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=1200:keyint=30 -oac > mp3lame -lameopts br=128:cbr:mode=3 -ffourcc divx -endpos 1064 -o > /mnt/40gig/b.avi > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users -- Mike Ruelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~mruelle/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] record command
Hi I've been trying to get recording to work, and i'm pretty sure my record command is broken. By playing with it on the command line, I can get this to record picture, but it has no sound - (sound works fine when watching tv). I'm using a composite input, with the sound comingo ut of the tv card and going into the line-in on the sound card. I've checked in aumix and everything is turned up - does anyone know where I'm going wrong? Cheers Dave /usr/bin/mencoder -tv on:driver=v4l:input=0:norm=PAL:input=2:width=320:height=240:outfmt=yv12:device=/dev/video0:adevice=/dev/dsp:audiorate=32000:forceaudio:forcechan=1:buffersize=64 -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=1200:keyint=30 -oac mp3lame -lameopts br=128:cbr:mode=3 -ffourcc divx -endpos 1064 -o /mnt/40gig/b.avi --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] How to stop lircd-commands from being repeated?
Hello, my regards go to the freevo developers for the latest improvements. My personal experience with freevo's lirc-support is that it feels much smoother now (using 1.4rc1). For example, the scrolling in huge directory-lists works pretty well for me (no more annoying delays when I stop pressing the up/down key). One issue remains for me: Some commands (like SELECT or DISPLAY) should not have repetition at all. I often start the random playlist in a music directory accidentally when I just wanted to browse it (because I pressed a little too long). I tried to solve this by changing my lircrc-file: begin remote = SONY_PS2 button = ENTER prog = freevo config = SELECT repeat = 0 end begin remote = SONY_PS2 button = DISPLAY prog = freevo config = DISPLAY repeat = 0 end I first thought that my lircd.conf (or even my remote) would be the problem. However, if I use irexec (even parallel to freevo) with the following configuration, it works without unwanted repetitions. begin remote = SONY_PS2 button = ENTER prog = irexec repeat = 0 config = echo "Hello world!" end How can this be? I thought an application using lirc would only receive one command-event for a keypress if repeat=0... Best regards, Markus Schneider --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Recording server
Tim Walter wrote: First to get it out the way.. Can the record server run without XMLTV installed? Yes. You must still have TV_CHANNELS configured in your local_conf.py. Assuming it can, how can I start the Record Server manually as a check? Whatever I try and organise the web interface resolutely announces the record server is offline/not active etc. RH9 Freevo via RPM 1.3.4 Mplayer 0.92 and mencoder I have tried to follow the instructions and have crontab running record_daemon.py every minute Added the "fix" to avoid crashes (docs section 2.3.4) Edited inittab according to the doc page (though I don't have a boot directory, but the record_server_init file is in the helpers directory within freevo??? Tried ./freevo recordserver with no apparent effect (merely starts freevo as usual) Where do I go from here? Things have changed a bit since the 1.3.4 release. The docs are probably more geared towards 1.4. Can you try out the 1.4-rc1 rpm's instead? I think you will have better luck. :) -Rob --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] Recording server
Hi, Still troubled by trying to get the recording server to work... First to get it out the way.. Can the record server run without XMLTV installed? Assuming it can, how can I start the Record Server manually as a check? Whatever I try and organise the web interface resolutely announces the record server is offline/not active etc. RH9 Freevo via RPM 1.3.4 Mplayer 0.92 and mencoder I have tried to follow the instructions and have crontab running record_daemon.py every minute Added the "fix" to avoid crashes (docs section 2.3.4) Edited inittab according to the doc page (though I don't have a boot directory, but the record_server_init file is in the helpers directory within freevo??? Tried ./freevo recordserver with no apparent effect (merely starts freevo as usual) Where do I go from here? Desperate of Newbury -- Tim http://yingtong.co.uk AMD Athlon 1000, 400Mb Ram, 40GB HD Hauppauge PCI TV card, PAL Radeon 9200 VO, RH9, Freevo1.3.4 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] lircd-problems
hi all, today i set up freevo to be controlled via ir. when i boot directly into freevo, the lirc daemon (i startet before) dies and an error message is displayed in /var/log/messages: --- lirc_serial: port 03f8 already in use, proceeding anywaykernel: lirc_serial: compile the serial port driver as module andkernel: lirc_serial: make sure this module is loaded first--- afterwards, when i log in as root and start the freevo-start script manually, everything works fine.. what did i do wrong ? and how can i fix it ? thanks :) stefan
[Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
Peter Svensson wrote: > I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=3.9, whereas > local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=3.9 > > They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, some > version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name in the > example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= Oops, fixed in CVS now. Dischi -- Just remember, if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
Just an update...you just *gotta* love debian ;) juhis On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 18:49, Juha wrote: > Ok, thanks! Now I get it ;) > > I'll try to grab python from unstable, if that works out. > > thanks, Juha > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 18:31, Aubin Paul wrote: > > Debhelper affects the _building_ of packages, not the installation. If > > you want to use precompiled packages you'd need to have a package > > called 'python' with version 2.3. This is not the same as having > > python2.3 > > > > The python package depends on the default version of python. You'd > > either need to grab the 'python' package from unstable (shouldn't be > > hard since it has almost no dependencies except Python2.3 itself) > > > > Aubin > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:14:47PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > Could you please elaborate? I've got version 4.1.75 of debhelper > > > installed, the same as in unstable. I'd love to make it just work[tm] ;) > > > > > > But doing eg. > > > > > > bash:~# apt-get install python2.3-mmpython > > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > > > > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that > > > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against > > > that package should be filed. > > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > python2.3-mmpython: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.2.3-3 is to be > > > installed > > > E: Broken packages > > > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:48, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > > It's because old versions of debhelper don't support 2.3. The best > > > > thing to do is grab a backport (or backport it youself) > > > > > > > > Aubin > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:33:04PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > > Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build > > > > > rules as you said. > > > > > > > > > > The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one > > > > > dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the > > > > > dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually > > > > > have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian > > > > > testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. > > > > > > > > > > anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) > > > > > > > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > > > > pylcd. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This SF.net email is
RE: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling
Thanks, that did the trick! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Ruelle Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling c or v which are ch+ and ch- should do the trick in both cases On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 12:05, Faser wrote: > Thanks, LEFT/RIGHT works! > But only in List mode, if you are in "Picture mode" it can't work as > LEFT/RIGHT goes to the item left or right! > > Cheers > > Frederik > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eirik > Meland > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling > > > "Faser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Excuse me if my question is just caused by my own mistake. But I can not > use > > the the Page UP/DOWN key to scroll through my Music Directory. Is this > just > > a problem of myself or isn't the Page UP/DOWN Key available at all? > > Try LEFT/RIGHT > > -- > Eirik Meland > > A: Top posters. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users -- Mike Ruelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~mruelle/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] G400 TV-Out
Just got my new G400 TV-Out card for my Freevo box. Anyone else using this card? What kind of setup issues (if any) have you had? I've done some pre-searching while waiting for delivery of the card and have found a couple sites for the G400. Can anyone provide links that may help set it up under Redhat 9? Thank is advance everyone.. Mike P.S. I also have a Sigma Designs Netstream 2000/TV card that does component YPbPr at native 1920/1080i resolutions but I'm having some probs with that under Redhat9 since the "open source" drivers that Sigma provides are not so open source (limited) and they've stopped development at kernel 2.4.19. Rh9 uses kernel 2.4.20. Anyone else have this card as well? --- this is probably very rare since it's a specialty card... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
he's talking about a system similar to freshrpms. freshrpms.net has the setup details. On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:57, Aubin Paul wrote: > I don't know what you mean... what do you mean by 'debian type' > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:03:29PM -0700, skeeterskip wrote: > > Aubin, > > > > If you want, you can post debian type code to > > http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ I just emailed site owner and he is > > interested. He runs a debian type installation that runs on Redhat 9. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Aubin Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:08 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies > > > > > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > pylcd. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > ___ > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users -- Mike Ruelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~mruelle/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
RE: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling
c or v which are ch+ and ch- should do the trick in both cases On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 12:05, Faser wrote: > Thanks, LEFT/RIGHT works! > But only in List mode, if you are in "Picture mode" it can't work as > LEFT/RIGHT goes to the item left or right! > > Cheers > > Frederik > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eirik > Meland > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling > > > "Faser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Excuse me if my question is just caused by my own mistake. But I can not > use > > the the Page UP/DOWN key to scroll through my Music Directory. Is this > just > > a problem of myself or isn't the Page UP/DOWN Key available at all? > > Try LEFT/RIGHT > > -- > Eirik Meland > > A: Top posters. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users -- Mike Ruelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~mruelle/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
RE: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling
Thanks, LEFT/RIGHT works! But only in List mode, if you are in "Picture mode" it can't work as LEFT/RIGHT goes to the item left or right! Cheers Frederik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eirik Meland Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling "Faser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Excuse me if my question is just caused by my own mistake. But I can not use > the the Page UP/DOWN key to scroll through my Music Directory. Is this just > a problem of myself or isn't the Page UP/DOWN Key available at all? Try LEFT/RIGHT -- Eirik Meland A: Top posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
Ok, thanks! Now I get it ;) I'll try to grab python from unstable, if that works out. thanks, Juha On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 18:31, Aubin Paul wrote: > Debhelper affects the _building_ of packages, not the installation. If > you want to use precompiled packages you'd need to have a package > called 'python' with version 2.3. This is not the same as having > python2.3 > > The python package depends on the default version of python. You'd > either need to grab the 'python' package from unstable (shouldn't be > hard since it has almost no dependencies except Python2.3 itself) > > Aubin > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:14:47PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > Could you please elaborate? I've got version 4.1.75 of debhelper > > installed, the same as in unstable. I'd love to make it just work[tm] ;) > > > > But doing eg. > > > > bash:~# apt-get install python2.3-mmpython > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that > > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against > > that package should be filed. > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > python2.3-mmpython: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.2.3-3 is to be > > installed > > E: Broken packages > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:48, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > It's because old versions of debhelper don't support 2.3. The best > > > thing to do is grab a backport (or backport it youself) > > > > > > Aubin > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:33:04PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build > > > > rules as you said. > > > > > > > > The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one > > > > dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the > > > > dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually > > > > have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian > > > > testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. > > > > > > > > anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) > > > > > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > > > pylcd. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > ___ > > > > > Freevo-users mailing lis
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
Debhelper affects the _building_ of packages, not the installation. If you want to use precompiled packages you'd need to have a package called 'python' with version 2.3. This is not the same as having python2.3 The python package depends on the default version of python. You'd either need to grab the 'python' package from unstable (shouldn't be hard since it has almost no dependencies except Python2.3 itself) Aubin On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:14:47PM +0300, Juha wrote: > Could you please elaborate? I've got version 4.1.75 of debhelper > installed, the same as in unstable. I'd love to make it just work[tm] ;) > > But doing eg. > > bash:~# apt-get install python2.3-mmpython > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against > that package should be filed. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > python2.3-mmpython: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.2.3-3 is to be > installed > E: Broken packages > > thanks, Juha > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:48, Aubin Paul wrote: > > It's because old versions of debhelper don't support 2.3. The best > > thing to do is grab a backport (or backport it youself) > > > > Aubin > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:33:04PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build > > > rules as you said. > > > > > > The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one > > > dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the > > > dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually > > > have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian > > > testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. > > > > > > anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) > > > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > > pylcd. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > ___ > > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > ___ > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
Could you please elaborate? I've got version 4.1.75 of debhelper installed, the same as in unstable. I'd love to make it just work[tm] ;) But doing eg. bash:~# apt-get install python2.3-mmpython Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python2.3-mmpython: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.2.3-3 is to be installed E: Broken packages thanks, Juha On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:48, Aubin Paul wrote: > It's because old versions of debhelper don't support 2.3. The best > thing to do is grab a backport (or backport it youself) > > Aubin > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:33:04PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build > > rules as you said. > > > > The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one > > dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the > > dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually > > have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian > > testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. > > > > anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) > > > > thanks, Juha > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > pylcd. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > ___ > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
It's because old versions of debhelper don't support 2.3. The best thing to do is grab a backport (or backport it youself) Aubin On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:33:04PM +0300, Juha wrote: > Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build > rules as you said. > > The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one > dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the > dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually > have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian > testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. > > anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) > > thanks, Juha > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > pylcd. > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies -> RPMs?
Right, but it uses a different packaging system; I don't know much about RPMs, but maybe Wan Tat Chee would be able to provide them for him. Aubin On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:42:48PM -0700, skeeterskip wrote: > well, you can type apt-get install packagename to install packages. Then it > auto-installs all the dependencies with it. Isn't that how Debian works? > > - Original Message - > From: "Aubin Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies > > > > I don't know what you mean... what do you mean by 'debian type' > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:03:29PM -0700, skeeterskip wrote: > > > Aubin, > > > > > > If you want, you can post debian type code to > > > http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ I just emailed site owner and he is > > > interested. He runs a debian type installation that runs on Redhat 9. > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Aubin Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:08 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies > > > > > > > > > > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > > > > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > > > > the source packages from elsewhere. > > > > > > > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > > > > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > > > > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > > > > > > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > > > > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > > > > > > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > > > > pylcd. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > > > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian > unstable > > > > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > > > > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > > > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > > > > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > > > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages > makes > > > > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > ___ > > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > ___ > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https:
Re: [Freevo-users] debian testing dependecies
Ok, no big deal. Especially if most of the packages have debian/ build rules as you said. The thing with the dependencies is a bit annoying though. The one dependency that seems to cause all the trouble is python2.3. What the dependency checking system can't seem to figure out is that I actually have python versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 installed, but only the 'debian testing' default one, ie. python2.2 is detected. anyhow, got some compiling to do... ;) thanks, Juha On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 00:08, Aubin Paul wrote: > The problem is mainly that we have limited storage space on the > Sourceforge server. I can put up the diffs, but you'd have to fetch > the source packages from elsewhere. > > In quite a few cases, the packages include the debian/ build rules, so > it should be easy to get the upstream and build them. Offhand, I know > that mmpython, pylirc and freevo itself have them. > > python2.3-fchksum is available from the maintainer as a deb too. > (google for python2.3-fchksum) > > The missing packages (for which I can provide diffs) are mp1e, and > pylcd. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:25:19PM +0300, Juha wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I guess this question is mostly to Aubin. Would it be possible to > > provide the debian source packages in addition to the debian unstable > > binaries that can currently be found on > > > > http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main > > (ie. deb-src http://freevo.sourceforge.net/debian unstable main) > > > > This way I could build the packages easily for my testing/unstable > > debian installation. The dependencies in the pre-built packages makes > > them very hard to install them on my installation. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Juha > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling
"Faser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Excuse me if my question is just caused by my own mistake. But I can not use > the the Page UP/DOWN key to scroll through my Music Directory. Is this just > a problem of myself or isn't the Page UP/DOWN Key available at all? Try LEFT/RIGHT -- Eirik Meland A: Top posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] Page UP/DOWN Keys for scrolling
Hi All! Excuse me if my question is just caused by my own mistake. But I can not use the the Page UP/DOWN key to scroll through my Music Directory. Is this just a problem of myself or isn't the Page UP/DOWN Key available at all? Cheers Frederik --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
[Freevo-users] RPM for freevo full binary release 1.4-rc1 available
I've just uploaded the full binary RPM packages for 1.4-rc1, named freevo-*rpm. Please read the release notes for more information. You don't need this if you've already configured your system to use the freevo-src*rpm and freevo-deps packages. PS. The freevo-core-suite and freevo-recording-suite metapackages have also been updated to reflect new dependency information. T.C. Wan Tat Chee (Lecturer) School of Computer Science, Univ. of Science Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia. Rm.625 Ofc Ph: +604 653-3888 x 3617 NRG Lab Admin: +604 659-4757 Rm.601-E Ofc Ph: +604 653-4396 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web: http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan GPG Key : http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan/tcw_gpg-20030322.asc F'print : DCF2 B9B2 FA4D 1208 AD59 14CA 9A8F F54D B2C4 63C7 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
I had to make modifications like Wan Tat meantioned. - Original Message - From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:09 AM Subject: SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > ..but.. it's right there in your local_conf.py. It reads > LOCAL_CONFIG_VERSION instead of CONFIG_VERSION, doesn't it? > > /Peter > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: skeeterskip > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: 2003-10-15 09:43 > Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > I've tried all different types of combinations now. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freevo > > Warning: display is set to x11, but the environment has no DISPLAY set. > Setting display to fbdev. > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/main.py", line 87, in ? > import config > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/config.py", line 370, in > ? > print 'in %s to %s' % (overridefile, LOCAL_CONF_VERSION) > NameError: name 'LOCAL_CONF_VERSION' is not defined > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# > > I have attached the files. > > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'skeeterskip '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:10 AM > Subject: SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=3.9, > whereas > > local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=3.9 > > > > They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, > some > > version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name > in > the > > example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= > > > > /Peter > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > > Från: skeeterskip > > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: 2003-10-15 08:59 > > Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have > > it > > commented out. They both show 3.9. > > > > I will check again, though. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > > > > > CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 > > > > > > somewhere near the top. > > > > > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > > > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > > > > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible > > confusion > > > later on. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ > > Even > > > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in > XXX. > > You > > > > > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and > > shouldn't > > > > be > > > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > > > boot_config > > > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't > > include > > any > > > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > ___ > > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide
SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
..but.. it's right there in your local_conf.py. It reads LOCAL_CONFIG_VERSION instead of CONFIG_VERSION, doesn't it? /Peter -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: skeeterskip Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: 2003-10-15 09:43 Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo I've tried all different types of combinations now. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freevo Warning: display is set to x11, but the environment has no DISPLAY set. Setting display to fbdev. Error: your local_config.py file has no version information Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/main.py", line 87, in ? import config File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/config.py", line 370, in ? print 'in %s to %s' % (overridefile, LOCAL_CONF_VERSION) NameError: name 'LOCAL_CONF_VERSION' is not defined [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# I have attached the files. - Original Message - From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'skeeterskip '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:10 AM Subject: SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=3.9, whereas > local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=3.9 > > They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, some > version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name in the > example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= > > /Peter > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: skeeterskip > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: 2003-10-15 08:59 > Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have > it > commented out. They both show 3.9. > > I will check again, though. > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > > > CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 > > > > somewhere near the top. > > > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible > confusion > > later on. > > > > Dave > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ > Even > > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. > You > > > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and > shouldn't > > > be > > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > > boot_config > > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't > include > any > > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > ___ > > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > >
Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
Wan Tat Chee, Yep, you fixed it. It works now! - Original Message - From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo I reported this as a bug on the devel list just now. Anyway, don't touch your freevo_config.py. What you need in your local_conf.py at the top is: LOCAL_CONF_VERSION =.9 CONFIG_VERSION =.9 The first variable is defined in the example file, what's missing is the second variable. I think you spelt the LOCA_CONF_VERSION incorrectly in your file. Of course, this is known to be true only for 1.4-rc1. Things may change in the next version (or in CVS currently). T.C. Wan Tat Chee (Lecturer) School of Computer Science, Univ. of Science Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia. Rm.625 Ofc Ph: +604 653-3888 x 3617 NRG Lab Admin: +604 659-4757 Rm.601-E Ofc Ph: +604 653-4396 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web: http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan GPG Key : http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan/tcw_gpg-20030322.asc F'print : DCF2 B9B2 FA4D 1208 AD59 14CA 9A8F F54D B2C4 63C7 On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, skeeterskip wrote: > I've tried all different types of combinations now. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freevo > > Warning: display is set to x11, but the environment has no DISPLAY set. > Setting display to fbdev. > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/main.py", line 87, in ? > import config > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/config.py", line 370, in ? > print 'in %s to %s' % (overridefile, LOCAL_CONF_VERSION) > NameError: name 'LOCAL_CONF_VERSION' is not defined > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# > > I have attached the files. > > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'skeeterskip '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:10 AM > Subject: SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=9, whereas > > local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=9 > > > > They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, > some > > version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name in > the > > example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= > > > > /Peter > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > > Från: skeeterskip > > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: 2003-10-15 08:59 > > Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have > > it > > commented out. They both show 3.9. > > > > I will check again, though. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > > > > > CONFIG_VERSION =.9 > > > > > > somewhere near the top. > > > > > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > > > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > > > > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible > > confusion > > > later on. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ > > Even > > > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. > > You > > > > > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=sr/share/freevo > > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and > > shouldn't > > > > be > > > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > > > boot_config > > > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't > > include > > any > > > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > S
Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
I reported this as a bug on the devel list just now. Anyway, don't touch your freevo_config.py. What you need in your local_conf.py at the top is: LOCAL_CONF_VERSION = 3.9 CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 The first variable is defined in the example file, what's missing is the second variable. I think you spelt the LOCA_CONF_VERSION incorrectly in your file. Of course, this is known to be true only for 1.4-rc1. Things may change in the next version (or in CVS currently). T.C. Wan Tat Chee (Lecturer) School of Computer Science, Univ. of Science Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia. Rm.625 Ofc Ph: +604 653-3888 x 3617 NRG Lab Admin: +604 659-4757 Rm.601-E Ofc Ph: +604 653-4396 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web: http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan GPG Key : http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan/tcw_gpg-20030322.asc F'print : DCF2 B9B2 FA4D 1208 AD59 14CA 9A8F F54D B2C4 63C7 On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, skeeterskip wrote: > I've tried all different types of combinations now. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freevo > > Warning: display is set to x11, but the environment has no DISPLAY set. > Setting display to fbdev. > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/main.py", line 87, in ? > import config > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/freevo/config.py", line 370, in ? > print 'in %s to %s' % (overridefile, LOCAL_CONF_VERSION) > NameError: name 'LOCAL_CONF_VERSION' is not defined > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# > > I have attached the files. > > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'skeeterskip '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:10 AM > Subject: SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=3.9, whereas > > local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=3.9 > > > > They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, > some > > version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name in > the > > example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= > > > > /Peter > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > > Från: skeeterskip > > Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: 2003-10-15 08:59 > > Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have > > it > > commented out. They both show 3.9. > > > > I will check again, though. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > > > > > CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 > > > > > > somewhere near the top. > > > > > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > > > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > > > > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible > > confusion > > > later on. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ > > Even > > > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. > > You > > > > > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and > > shouldn't > > > > be > > > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > > > boot_config > > > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't > > include > > any > > > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > > > _
SV: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
I think that freevo_config.py has a line with LOCAL_CONFIG=3.9, whereas local_config.py should have CONFIG_VERSION=3.9 They look kind of the same, and it has fooled me more than once. Also, some version(1.4.x, cvs-or-not) apparently used the _wrong_ variable name in the example local_config.py, just to make things more interesting :-)= /Peter -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: skeeterskip Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: 2003-10-15 08:59 Ämne: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have it commented out. They both show 3.9. I will check again, though. - Original Message - From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 > > somewhere near the top. > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible confusion > later on. > > Dave > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ Even > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. You > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and shouldn't > > be > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > boot_config > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't include any > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
that is what I figured, but both files already have that line and have it commented out. They both show 3.9. I will check again, though. - Original Message - From: "Dave Smylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: > > CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 > > somewhere near the top. > > make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks > /root/.freevo/local_config.py > > I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible confusion > later on. > > Dave > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ Even > > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. You > > > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and shouldn't > > be > > > > there at all. > > > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > > boot_config > > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't include any > > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > > ___ > > > Freevo-users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo
you need to edit local_config.py and add the line: CONFIG_VERSION = 3.9 somewhere near the top. make sure its the version that you are using - by the looks /root/.freevo/local_config.py I would advise removing the other copy so as to avoid possible confusion later on. Dave On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:21, skeeterskip wrote: > hmm. I copied local_config.py file to etc/freevo and root/.freevo/ Even > though both files are same, I get following after I type freevo: > > Error: your local_config.py file has no version information > Please check freevo_config.py for changes and set CONFIG_VERSION > in /root/.freevo/local_conf.py to 3.9 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Wan Tat Chee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] Re: new freevo > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > > > > > > > > Oh! The 1.4-rc1 freevo-src package puts freevo_config.py in XXX. You > > > > Pressed send before I should have. XXX=/usr/share/freevo > > > > > shouldn't touch it. It's no longer needed in /etc/freevo and shouldn't > be > > > there at all. > > > > > > /etc/freevo should contain only freevo.conf, local_conf.py and > boot_config > > > (if freevo-src-boot package is installed). This list doesn't include any > > > backup files created in the process of upgrading etc of course. > > > > > > There's a sample local_conf.py in /usr/share/doc/freevo*/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > > ___ > > Freevo-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > ___ > Freevo-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users > > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php ___ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
