[FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread peter

http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol15/?pg=173

Here is a beautiful article by George Dyson that is truly one of the 
clearest examples of the current problems with complexity theory 
especially its relationship to economics , what it is trying to do and 
what it actually did with the mess created on wall street it should make 
every every CTO and CEO sit up and shudder.


Basically the credit models created by complexity science geniuses, that 
are the foundation of most high flying arbitrage financial houses, 
created there own version of  reality that had very little relevance to 
the real world.  These same geniuses made enormous amounts of money by 
designing this fake world and convincing there neophyte non tech masters 
they should be paid millions for its discovery conveniently forgetting 
that its roots were firmly built in fiction  Someone shouts the Emperor 
has no clothes and presto the whole house comes tumbling down


The FBI is also apparently digging into this cesspool so expect to see a 
large number of these bright software phds entering federal prison in 
the not to distant future


It also has relevance to the scary statement by Janet Wing at the 
institute when she said that future computer models need not be grounded 
in reality but could create there own.


Think also on the connection that not only are these complex models non 
verifiable but so are most databases and agent modeling systems. Without 
easy verifiability I would submit they are worse than

useless

As Dyson points out the tally sticks  stocks that where used in the 
13th century are far superior to the billions of dollars of hardware and 
software used today. A stick  Stock  lived in the real world and was 
verifiable at the lowest level of inspection. Sadly today our complex 
system have proved to be totally non verifiable with the associated 
collapse of trust.


Its also a stark example to our 1st mile friends about the higher 
relevance of what goes into the pipe rather than the pipe itself and why 
hi speed verification of what is happening in the real world is so much 
more important


The quicker we realize that the raison d'etre of the digital world is to 
improve the quality of life and include some moral directives in our 
work based in reality the more we will be able to sleep at night


( : ( : pete
--

Peter Baston

*IDEAS*

/www.ideapete.com/ http://www.ideapete.com/







FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread glen e. p. ropella

Hey Pete,

That's definitely an interesting extrapolation from that Make article.
I love stuff like that.  Thanks.

But can you help me reduce my ignorance?  Which complexity science
geniuses created these credit models?  And which ones do you think
might go to jail?

-glen

Thus spake peter circa 09/30/2008 11:06 AM:
 http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol15/?pg=173
 
 Here is a beautiful article by George Dyson that is truly one of the
 clearest examples of the current problems with complexity theory
 especially its relationship to economics , what it is trying to do and
 what it actually did with the mess created on wall street it should make
 every every CTO and CEO sit up and shudder.
 
 Basically the credit models created by complexity science geniuses, that
 are the foundation of most high flying arbitrage financial houses,
 created there own version of  reality that had very little relevance to
 the real world.  These same geniuses made enormous amounts of money by
 designing this fake world and convincing there neophyte non tech masters
 they should be paid millions for its discovery conveniently forgetting
 that its roots were firmly built in fiction  Someone shouts the Emperor
 has no clothes and presto the whole house comes tumbling down
 
 The FBI is also apparently digging into this cesspool so expect to see a
 large number of these bright software phds entering federal prison in
 the not to distant future
 
 It also has relevance to the scary statement by Janet Wing at the
 institute when she said that future computer models need not be grounded
 in reality but could create there own.
 
 Think also on the connection that not only are these complex models non
 verifiable but so are most databases and agent modeling systems. Without
 easy verifiability I would submit they are worse than
 useless
 
 As Dyson points out the tally sticks  stocks that where used in the
 13th century are far superior to the billions of dollars of hardware and
 software used today. A stick  Stock  lived in the real world and was
 verifiable at the lowest level of inspection. Sadly today our complex
 system have proved to be totally non verifiable with the associated
 collapse of trust.
 
 Its also a stark example to our 1st mile friends about the higher
 relevance of what goes into the pipe rather than the pipe itself and why
 hi speed verification of what is happening in the real world is so much
 more important
 
 The quicker we realize that the raison d'etre of the digital world is to
 improve the quality of life and include some moral directives in our
 work based in reality the more we will be able to sleep at night


-- 
glen e. p. ropella, 971-219-3846, http://tempusdictum.com



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread PPARYSKI
I totally agree with Pete and might add from personal experience that the 
same persons who create and use such models, also create and use rumours and 
other very questionable methods to manipulate the market, aside. of course, 
from 
the highly risky hedge funding (we had long discussions at the FRIAM meetings 
about using hedging to pay for health care; I was totally opposed).   
Unfortunately many of the financial asset managers acted exactly like the CEO 
and 
others at ENRON.   I believe they are criminal and motivated by greed and fear 
(like so much othe culture and media now).   The empire is perhpas crumbling.   
Non-regulated markets generally fail in the end. 

As ex UN environmental governance expert and seeing how countries are 
inadequately reacting to global warming and other environmental threats, I 
believe 
that it is time to rationally analyze the balance between natural resources and 
human needs and find a more sustainable models.   Jared Diamond points out 
this necessity in his book Collapse.

I also would like to see all complexity modelers adept a code of principles 
and morality to avoid the misuses of complexity, e.g., torture, military 
aggression, financial manipulations. etc.

Enough, Perhaps too much.   Please excuse my rage.

Paul Paryski



**
Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and 
calculators.
  (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall0001)

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The empire is perhpas crumbling.
Nah.  Dow is already back 400 points so far.   If it would just have 
slid a little more then there would have been some really good buys!


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread PPARYSKI
PS did anyone answer Pete's question as to the identity of the creators of 
the financial market complexity models?   Paul


**
Looking for simple 
solutions to your real-life financial challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the 
latest news and information, tips and calculators.
  
(http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall0001)

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly killed America

2008-09-30 Thread Phil Henshaw
That's a good example of the way models fail as I've been describing.   We
make models as projections of how things made sense in the past and not to
have any awareness of the future except their own failure.  That's where my
method kicks ass.  

 

I don't have the fancy tools others do, but I watch the environment for the
divergent processes that are emerging and ask the dumb questions, like what
will they run into and how will they be changed by it.   One thing that
happens when growth system collide with their limits is that their
independent parts run into each other.I pegged this whole thing 16
months ago (and 30 years ago as well) and spotted the collision between the
growth centers of energy and food (evident in the global price war
bio-ethanol was part of touching off) and how that started a series of
unexpected changes in direction.I called it the beginning of the big
crunch and the control system misbehavior fishtailing.   If people want
to know what to do to reduce the level of the calamity even at this point
they should ask.

 

Phil Henshaw

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of peter
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:06 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group; 1st-Mile-NM
Subject: [FRIAM] Economic Disequilibrium or How Complexity Science nearly
killed America

 

http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol15/?pg=173

Here is a beautiful article by George Dyson that is truly one of the
clearest examples of the current problems with complexity theory especially
its relationship to economics , what it is trying to do and what it actually
did with the mess created on wall street it should make every every CTO and
CEO sit up and shudder.

Basically the credit models created by complexity science geniuses, that are
the foundation of most high flying arbitrage financial houses, created there
own version of  reality that had very little relevance to the real world.
These same geniuses made enormous amounts of money by designing this fake
world and convincing there neophyte non tech masters they should be paid
millions for its discovery conveniently forgetting that its roots were
firmly built in fiction  Someone shouts the Emperor has no clothes and
presto the whole house comes tumbling down

The FBI is also apparently digging into this cesspool so expect to see a
large number of these bright software phds entering federal prison in the
not to distant future

It also has relevance to the scary statement by Janet Wing at the institute
when she said that future computer models need not be grounded in reality
but could create there own.

Think also on the connection that not only are these complex models non
verifiable but so are most databases and agent modeling systems. Without
easy verifiability I would submit they are worse than
 useless

As Dyson points out the tally sticks  stocks that where used in the 13th
century are far superior to the billions of dollars of hardware and software
used today. A stick  Stock  lived in the real world and was verifiable at
the lowest level of inspection. Sadly today our complex system have proved
to be totally non verifiable with the associated collapse of trust.

Its also a stark example to our 1st mile friends about the higher relevance
of what goes into the pipe rather than the pipe itself and why hi speed
verification of what is happening in the real world is so much more
important

The quicker we realize that the raison d'etre of the digital world is to
improve the quality of life and include some moral directives in our work
based in reality the more we will be able to sleep at night

( : ( : pete

-- 



Peter Baston

IDEAS

 http://www.ideapete.com/ www.ideapete.com

 

 

 


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

[FRIAM] Slashdot | Stallman Says Cloud Computing Is a Trap

2008-09-30 Thread Owen Densmore
Interesting discussion on /.
   http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/30/2146250

When we started thinking about the sys admin issues for sfx 
(http://sfcomplex.org/ 
), we had to decide on how to address free web services.  One example  
we had used earlier was PBWiki, a very nice wiki engine.  Another was 
http://www.airset.com/ 
  .. a very nice web community site.

The principle we evolved was simply this: we can use any SaaS  
(Software as a Service) system as long as any data we put into the  
system was easily available in a standard format.

This means, for example, use of Google Calendar was fine: it is an  
iCal system with easily downloadable calendar data in a standard  
format.  Note that GMail similarly passes the test: the mail data can  
easily be captured via the IMAP or POP protocols.

PBWiki failed: there was no easy way to capture the format in a  
standard format .. i.e. in a wiki markup language.  Ditto for airset,  
the system was too difficult to extract and place into any of the  
usual CMS systems (Joomla, Drupal etc)

On the other hand, one of our projects is looking hard at deploying  
web applications on Google Maps and Google App Engine.  This looks  
fairly safe: the main features we are using on Google Maps are lat/lng  
which transfer to other GIS systems nicely.  Similarly, the App Engine  
uses python and Django templates, and all of the system is developed  
off-line then uploaded.  It's only oddness is its datastore, which  
maps fairly nicely onto other sytems.  We also are cautious about  
having a Plan B .. i.e. how to extricate.

So our approach of standards and data extractability is one approach.

How do you handle this?  Any horror stories?  .. successes?

-- Owen



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


[FRIAM] Vote Obama or McCain: Global Electoral College | The Economist

2008-09-30 Thread Owen Densmore
Kinda nifty:
   http://www.economist.com/vote2008/
.. a world wide vote, even using an electoral college model.  Such a  
huge landslide for Obama .. but then its quite a select audience!

Interesting use of GIS as well.  I wonder how hard it is for their IT  
department to cons up such a critter?!

-- Owen



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org