Re: [FRIAM] Hot Air, and Compressibilty

2009-11-28 Thread Robert Holmes
NASA have got a Beginner's Guide to
Aeronauticshttp://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/index.htmlthat's
worth looking at. It's includes a section on compressible
aerodynamics http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/bgc.html, which -
as Peter points out - is not the regime that these turbines are operating in
(as object speeds are much lower than speed of sound).

-- R

P.S. Nick - meteorologists are saying just what you think they are: a cubic
meter of air down here has a higher mass than a cubic meter of air up there.
That NASA site has an interactive demo called Gaslab (at bottom
herehttp://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/InteractProgs/index.htm)
that enables you to explore the ideal gas law.



On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Nicholas Thompson 
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:

 Yes.  And while we are at it, what does it mean when meteorologists say
 that air is more dense near the surface than higher up, or that cold air is
 denser than warm?

 N

 Nicholas S. Thompson
 Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
 Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
 http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/
 http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]




  [Original Message]
  From: Marcus G. Daniels mar...@snoutfarm.com
  To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
 friam@redfish.com
  Date: 11/27/2009 11:21:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Hot Air, and Compressibilty
 
  plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
  
   You have to sweep your hand at a speed comparable to that of sound
   (about 330 m/s here on earth) in order stop the air from getting away
   and to achieve any compression.
  
  Ok, so in one of the articles mentioned,
 
 http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/40993
 
  ..it said..
 
  What they found was that a staggered column of alternately clockwise-
  and anticlockwise-rotating turbines significantly enhances the speed of
  turbine rotation. The reason, they say, is that the presence of
  neighbouring turbines concentrates and accelerates the wind.
 
  The term `concentrate', to me, sounds like a synonym of `compress' but
  in any case `accelerate' could be true in any case.
 
  The authors of the work are Caltech aerodynamics guys, so if all you'll
  give us is, Shut up and trust the experts, well...
 
  Is their claim impossible?
 
  Marcus
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Hot Air, and Compressibilty

2009-11-28 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Look, I know I'm wrong here, but 

Doesnt greater density imply compression?  

N

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]




- Original Message - 
From: Robert Holmes 
To: nickthomp...@earthlink.net;The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee 
Group
Sent: 11/28/2009 8:39:03 AM 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Hot Air, and Compressibilty


NASA have got a Beginner's Guide to Aeronautics that's worth looking at. It's 
includes a section on compressible aerodynamics, which - as Peter points out - 
is not the regime that these turbines are operating in (as object speeds are 
much lower than speed of sound).

-- R

P.S. Nick - meteorologists are saying just what you think they are: a cubic 
meter of air down here has a higher mass than a cubic meter of air up there. 
That NASA site has an interactive demo called Gaslab (at bottom here) that 
enables you to explore the ideal gas law.




On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Nicholas Thompson 
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:

Yes.  And while we are at it, what does it mean when meteorologists say
that air is more dense near the surface than higher up, or that cold air is
denser than warm?

N

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]




 [Original Message]
 From: Marcus G. Daniels mar...@snoutfarm.com
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Date: 11/27/2009 11:21:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Hot Air, and Compressibilty


 plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
 
  You have to sweep your hand at a speed comparable to that of sound
  (about 330 m/s here on earth) in order stop the air from getting away
  and to achieve any compression.
 
 Ok, so in one of the articles mentioned,

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/40993

 ..it said..

 What they found was that a staggered column of alternately clockwise-
 and anticlockwise-rotating turbines significantly enhances the speed of
 turbine rotation. The reason, they say, is that the presence of
 neighbouring turbines concentrates and accelerates the wind.

 The term `concentrate', to me, sounds like a synonym of `compress' but
 in any case `accelerate' could be true in any case.

 The authors of the work are Caltech aerodynamics guys, so if all you'll
 give us is, Shut up and trust the experts, well...

 Is their claim impossible?

 Marcus









 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

[FRIAM] Array Interference

2009-11-28 Thread plissaman


Nick notes that there's something funny if an array reduces effective wind for 
a peleton of sweaty b icy clistes, but increases it for a bunch of spinning 
turbines. And he's dead right!  A nd these are legitimate, rational questions 
that an intelligen t layman should ask. The answer is that the science writer 
is propagating BS, as is often the case.  Did anyone hear it?  I have been in 
contact with the autho r , my friend, John Dabiri, who told me they weren't 
ready to release their paper yet but he'd send me ASAP!     When I study it, 
I'll brief Friamers on the content, and its validity.  I dunno!  And I'd like 
to read. 


Dick Feynman used to say unofficially that he never read papers, but if you 
told him the title and the author , he would tell you what it was about and why 
it was wrong!!   A good approach for genius , but bey ond me! 
Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures 

Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for. 

1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA 
tel:(505)983-7728 

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Array Interference

2009-11-28 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Thank you, Peter.  You are very kind to take the question seriously. 

Asking a question is like making a mess.  Doing it is alot easier than undoing 
it.  

I am particularly puzzled by the manner in which incompressibility would seem 
to disturb the ways in which people talk about meteorology.  Are we dealing 
with ways of speaking that are sufficient for some domains and not for others? 

And, as you all know, I fascinated by the manner in which scientists use the 
same words in such different ways as to disturb the flow of information between 
them.   

I await your report with enthusiasm. 

Nick 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: friam@redfish.com
Sent: 11/28/2009 10:31:30 AM 
Subject: [FRIAM] Array Interference


Nick notes that there's something funny if an array reduces effective wind for 
a peleton of sweaty bicyclistes, but increases it for a bunch of spinning 
turbines. And he's dead right!  And these are legitimate, rational questions 
that an intelligent layman should ask. The answer is that the science writer is 
propagating BS, as is often the case.  Did anyone hear it?  I have been in 
contact with the author, my friend, John Dabiri, who told me they weren't ready 
to release their paper yet but he'd send me ASAP!When I study it, I'll 
brief Friamers on the content, and its validity.  I dunno!  And I'd like to 
read.

Dick Feynman used to say unofficially that he never read papers, but if you 
told him the title and the author, he would tell you what it was about and why 
it was wrong!!   A good approach for genius , but beyond me!
Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures

Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for.

1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA
tel:(505)983-7728 
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Array Interference

2009-11-28 Thread Marcus Daniels

plissa...@comcast.net wrote:
I was concerned at his naive statement that the power increases 
because the rotational speed increases.
Wouldn't it be remarkable for these Caltech guys (ok, trained in 
aerodynamics but researching biopropulsion) to not hold torque fixed in 
their models?


Marcus


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Array Interference

2009-11-28 Thread Marcus Daniels

plissa...@comcast.net wrote:


When I study it, I'll brief Friamers on the content, and its validity. 


Looking forward to that!

Thanks,

Marcus


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


[FRIAM] fluid dynamics and art

2009-11-28 Thread Marcus Daniels

Hi,

Steve wrote:

SimTable (tm) is always in need of more
notional models to demonstrate it's utility across a wide variety of
domains, especially those likely to be involved in public-policy
decisions.
Also, the SF Complex art crowd might be interested in looking at 
interactive exhibits using fluid dynamics algorithms. 


Here are some cool videos of vortex sheets and vortices, etc.

http://media.efluids.com/galleries/vortex?medium=625
http://media.efluids.com/galleries/vortex?medium=578
http://media.efluids.com/galleries/vortex?medium=64

I recently had the opportunity to work on a OpenCL compressible gas 
dynamics code and was immediately struck by the beauty of these 
simulations.   I'm neither an artist or an applied math guy, so all I 
could do is make it go fast... A dollar a gigaflop these days with PS3s 
and GPUs, etc.


http://sourceforge.net/projects/hypgad/

Marcus



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org