Re: [FRIAM] [EXTERNAL] Re: A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?

2012-02-29 Thread Parks, Raymond
Heaters/furnaces/burners.

They can be electric, either off-site or co-gen, or they can use waste product. 
 However, natural gas is the most common.

Ray Parks


- Original Message -
From: David Mirly [mailto:mi...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:26 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join 
OPEC?

I'm not sure this statement is correct…natural gas is an input into gasoline 
refining (cracking the hydrocarbons)

I don't think natural gas and crude oil refining typically, if ever, intersect. 
 A crude oil refinery (which, of course, makes gasoline among other things) has 
only crude oil as it's main input.  

Now refineries differ from one another greatly in size and capabilities but I 
have never heard of natural gas being used in the gasoline manufacture process.





On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:55 AM, q...@aol.com wrote:

 Greetings, all --
 
 Gasland is on my list, but in the meantime, I know that natural gas is an 
 input into gasoline refining (cracking the hydrocarbons) and with natural gas 
 at (artificially?) low prices, our overall cost for refining gasoline in the 
 US is competitive worldwide. We're also the biggest user of gasoline (the 
 fuel mix in other countries focuses more on diesel), which means we have 
 competitively priced refined gasoline in general, and a bit of extra supply 
 in particular at the moment. The annual switchover of winter to summer 
 gasoline has been complicated by some scheduled maintenance and shut-downs at 
 various refineries, leading to a more pronounced annual spike than usual. Oh, 
 and there's the Straits of Hormuz thing...
 
 My $0.02,
 
 - Claiborne Booker -
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hugh Trenchard htrench...@shaw.ca
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Sent: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 10:12 am
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 Thanks for responding. Of course with natural gas, the first thing comes to 
 my mind is Gasland'.  But I suppose if some ot those environmental issues 
 can be brought under control, natural gas seems like it will be a big 
 economic driver for a while.
 - Original Message -
 From: Joshua Thorp
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 This sounds right to me.  There is a lot of finger wagging at Iran for not 
 having domestic capacity for petroleum refinement even though they are a 
 crude exporter.  So I guess capacity works both ways.  The other thing I know 
 is currently a hot topic is natural gas production.  I believe the US has 
 increased its production quite a bit lately and is likely to have a lot more 
 in the future.
 
 
 On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Hugh Trenchard wrote:
 
 Just as a brief follow up, it seems to me one of the major factors in this 
 is that U.S. refining capacity has increased so that there is less need to 
 import refined petroleum products.  I haven't researched this in any detail 
 and I stand to be corrected on all my assertions, but it seems to me it's 
 not as though there are any new sources of US domestic supply or significant 
 increase in technological ability to extract previously hard to obtain oil, 
 and likely only marginal reduction in demand. There may be some, but my 
 thought is the hype on this is rather misleading.  Again I don't have the 
 figures, but my guess is that the vast majority of US crude imports likely 
 still come from Canada, Mexico, and other western hemisphere nations, which 
 the U.S. refining companies refine and re-sell as petroleum products, both 
 for domestic use and to export abroad.
  
 The link below shows some of the definitions used in the petroleum/fuels 
 industry. From my skeptical standpoint, the hype could mislead the American 
 public toward a false sense of security.  I suppose if it stimulates the 
 economy, then that's good, but if it gets people guzzling more gas, then 
 it's really just a fool's game.
  
 http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/TblDefs/pet_move_imp_tbldef2.asp
  
 From the link: Petroleum products are obtained from the processing of crude 
 oil (including lease condensate), natural gas, and other hydrocarbon 
 compounds. Petroleum products include unfinished oils, liquefied petroleum 
 gases, pentanes plus, aviation gasoline, motor gasoline, naphtha-type jet 
 fuel, kerosene-type jet fuel, kerosene, distillate fuel oil, residual fuel 
 oil, petrochemical feedstocks, special naphthas, lubricants, waxes, 
 petroleum coke, asphalt, road oil, still gas, and miscellaneous products.
 - Original Message -
 From: Russ Abbott
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Cc: Hugh Trenchard
 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 7:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question

Re: [FRIAM] [EXTERNAL] Re: A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?

2012-02-29 Thread David Mirly
True, refineries use an enormous amount of electricity.

But my point was that natural gas is not an ingredient in the production of 
gasoline itself.  

If electricity generated by natural gas and then used by oil refineries was the 
point of the original post then I missed that.

At the refinery I worked at, we built a coke gasification unit to generate our 
own electricity.  40 Mw.


On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Parks, Raymond wrote:

 Heaters/furnaces/burners.
 
 They can be electric, either off-site or co-gen, or they can use waste 
 product.  However, natural gas is the most common.
 
 Ray Parks
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: David Mirly [mailto:mi...@comcast.net]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:26 PM
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States 
 join OPEC?
 
 I'm not sure this statement is correct…natural gas is an input into gasoline 
 refining (cracking the hydrocarbons)
 
 I don't think natural gas and crude oil refining typically, if ever, 
 intersect.  A crude oil refinery (which, of course, makes gasoline among 
 other things) has only crude oil as it's main input.  
 
 Now refineries differ from one another greatly in size and capabilities but I 
 have never heard of natural gas being used in the gasoline manufacture 
 process.
 
 
 
 
 
 On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:55 AM, q...@aol.com wrote:
 
 Greetings, all --
 
 Gasland is on my list, but in the meantime, I know that natural gas is an 
 input into gasoline refining (cracking the hydrocarbons) and with natural 
 gas at (artificially?) low prices, our overall cost for refining gasoline in 
 the US is competitive worldwide. We're also the biggest user of gasoline 
 (the fuel mix in other countries focuses more on diesel), which means we 
 have competitively priced refined gasoline in general, and a bit of extra 
 supply in particular at the moment. The annual switchover of winter to 
 summer gasoline has been complicated by some scheduled maintenance and 
 shut-downs at various refineries, leading to a more pronounced annual spike 
 than usual. Oh, and there's the Straits of Hormuz thing...
 
 My $0.02,
 
 - Claiborne Booker -
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hugh Trenchard htrench...@shaw.ca
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Sent: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 10:12 am
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 Thanks for responding. Of course with natural gas, the first thing comes to 
 my mind is Gasland'.  But I suppose if some ot those environmental issues 
 can be brought under control, natural gas seems like it will be a big 
 economic driver for a while.
 - Original Message -
 From: Joshua Thorp
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 This sounds right to me.  There is a lot of finger wagging at Iran for not 
 having domestic capacity for petroleum refinement even though they are a 
 crude exporter.  So I guess capacity works both ways.  The other thing I 
 know is currently a hot topic is natural gas production.  I believe the US 
 has increased its production quite a bit lately and is likely to have a lot 
 more in the future.
 
 
 On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Hugh Trenchard wrote:
 
 Just as a brief follow up, it seems to me one of the major factors in this 
 is that U.S. refining capacity has increased so that there is less need to 
 import refined petroleum products.  I haven't researched this in any detail 
 and I stand to be corrected on all my assertions, but it seems to me it's 
 not as though there are any new sources of US domestic supply or 
 significant increase in technological ability to extract previously hard to 
 obtain oil, and likely only marginal reduction in demand. There may be 
 some, but my thought is the hype on this is rather misleading.  Again I 
 don't have the figures, but my guess is that the vast majority of US crude 
 imports likely still come from Canada, Mexico, and other western hemisphere 
 nations, which the U.S. refining companies refine and re-sell as petroleum 
 products, both for domestic use and to export abroad.
 
 The link below shows some of the definitions used in the petroleum/fuels 
 industry. From my skeptical standpoint, the hype could mislead the American 
 public toward a false sense of security.  I suppose if it stimulates the 
 economy, then that's good, but if it gets people guzzling more gas, then 
 it's really just a fool's game.
 
 http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/TblDefs/pet_move_imp_tbldef2.asp
 
 From the link: Petroleum products are obtained from the processing of 
 crude oil (including lease condensate), natural gas, and other hydrocarbon 
 compounds. Petroleum products include unfinished oils, liquefied petroleum 
 gases, pentanes plus, aviation

Re: [FRIAM] [EXTERNAL] Re: A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?

2012-02-29 Thread qef
David --


Thanks for your comment. I suppose I should have been both more specific and 
more vague. It is sometimes an input, not an ingredient. Steam cracking, 
which sometimes uses LPG, appears not to be necessary for gasoline production, 
but it is useful for other hydrocarbons.


Please excuse my speculations. I have not worked in a refinery, but rather in 
the refined confines of energy analysis, which may explain some of my inexact 
language. I welcome all corrections. 

- Claiborne -


-Original Message-
From: David Mirly mi...@comcast.net
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [EXTERNAL] Re: A Good Question - Should the United States 
join OPEC?


True, refineries use an enormous amount of electricity.

But my point was that natural gas is not an ingredient in the production of 
gasoline itself.  

If electricity generated by natural gas and then used by oil refineries was the 
point of the original post then I missed that.

At the refinery I worked at, we built a coke gasification unit to generate our 
own electricity.  40 Mw.


On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Parks, Raymond wrote:

 Heaters/furnaces/burners.
 
 They can be electric, either off-site or co-gen, or they can use waste 
product.  However, natural gas is the most common.
 
 Ray Parks
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: David Mirly [mailto:mi...@comcast.net]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:26 PM
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States 
join OPEC?
 
 I'm not sure this statement is correct…natural gas is an input into gasoline 
refining (cracking the hydrocarbons)
 
 I don't think natural gas and crude oil refining typically, if ever, 
intersect.  A crude oil refinery (which, of course, makes gasoline among other 
things) has only crude oil as it's main input.  
 
 Now refineries differ from one another greatly in size and capabilities but I 
have never heard of natural gas being used in the gasoline manufacture process.
 
 
 
 
 
 On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:55 AM, q...@aol.com wrote:
 
 Greetings, all --
 
 Gasland is on my list, but in the meantime, I know that natural gas is an 
input into gasoline refining (cracking the hydrocarbons) and with natural gas 
at 
(artificially?) low prices, our overall cost for refining gasoline in the US is 
competitive worldwide. We're also the biggest user of gasoline (the fuel mix in 
other countries focuses more on diesel), which means we have competitively 
priced refined gasoline in general, and a bit of extra supply in particular at 
the moment. The annual switchover of winter to summer gasoline has been 
complicated by some scheduled maintenance and shut-downs at various refineries, 
leading to a more pronounced annual spike than usual. Oh, and there's the 
Straits of Hormuz thing...
 
 My $0.02,
 
 - Claiborne Booker -
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hugh Trenchard htrench...@shaw.ca
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Sent: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 10:12 am
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 Thanks for responding. Of course with natural gas, the first thing comes to 
my mind is Gasland'.  But I suppose if some ot those environmental issues can 
be brought under control, natural gas seems like it will be a big economic 
driver for a while.
 - Original Message -
 From: Joshua Thorp
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Good Question - Should the United States join OPEC?
 
 This sounds right to me.  There is a lot of finger wagging at Iran for not 
having domestic capacity for petroleum refinement even though they are a crude 
exporter.  So I guess capacity works both ways.  The other thing I know is 
currently a hot topic is natural gas production.  I believe the US has 
increased 
its production quite a bit lately and is likely to have a lot more in the 
future.
 
 
 On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Hugh Trenchard wrote:
 
 Just as a brief follow up, it seems to me one of the major factors in this 
is that U.S. refining capacity has increased so that there is less need to 
import refined petroleum products.  I haven't researched this in any detail and 
I stand to be corrected on all my assertions, but it seems to me it's not as 
though there are any new sources of US domestic supply or significant increase 
in technological ability to extract previously hard to obtain oil, and likely 
only marginal reduction in demand. There may be some, but my thought is the 
hype 
on this is rather misleading.  Again I don't have the figures, but my guess is 
that the vast majority of US crude imports likely still come from Canada, 
Mexico, and other western hemisphere nations, which the U.S. refining companies 
refine and re-sell