Re: [Full-disclosure] Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran
On 6/6/2012 6:08 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: You're a little bit confused here. It doesn't matter what people think. It matters what the people with more rifles, mortars, tanks, and ammo than you think. Unless you come up with a way to level the playing field. I think you just identified it. buy rifles (I have, there's a Colt M4 Law Enforcement Carbine sitting next to me), but mortars (a bit difficult but not impossible to get) buy tanks (quite easy to get if you know where to look), and buy ammo. DEMAND that federal firearms laws be revised, and specifically repeals of 18 USC 921-922. Yet again I point out your VT.edu e-mail and your refusal to listen to Jefferson's warnings. The man wrote your state constitution. He wasn't kidding when he did it. Andrew ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] Megaupload Anonymous hacker retaliation, nobody wins
Douchebags are all the same everywhere, even if you aren't Andrew Wallace, this does not make you not a douchebag. Sorry. Good luck with your packets! Andrew On 1/25/2012 4:24 PM, xD 0x41 wrote: stfu idiot. they can do wtf they want, think about that! now, go fuck yaself...and enjoy mailing on FD and secunia is like, got smtp problems now ;) tc. GLOW you all thought im some fuckwit called n3td3v ,for this, you all pay! I, single fucking handedly, will destroy secunia , and this bs list. BELIEVE THAT TO! On 26 January 2012 07:53, Levente Peressheri...@sansz.org wrote: On a personal note, maybe OFF... I fail to see the gain in such retaliations, especially in organized ones... First the Megaupload retaliation, now the UN... and for what... I know people want to be heard, but this is plainly sending the wrong message. This will give decision makers EXACTLY what they WANT. They coax otherwise smart people into acting out violently, thereby creating just the false-flag anarchy to prove their point, which is: yes, we need to censor and control everything especially the Internet, because see, there's already a 'war out there at the gates and we need to protect etc. whatever'. We've seen it before countless times and this reverse strategy almost always works. If anyone from the responsible groups are reading this, please know that I'm not against the point that you are trying to make... You are all learned and knowledgable people, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to pull this complicated scheme off... but I implore you to reconsider such outbursts in the future for the sake of the very thing that you are trying to protect... What's done is done, but let's not give these goons one more reason to take away freedom even more so... Please. Just consider this. That's all I'm asking... And I guess that's all I wanted to say. Levente On 01/25/2012 08:20 AM, karma cyberintel wrote: (CBS) - The week began on a high note for Internet activist. The biggest organized effort to blackout websites in solidarity over the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) was a huge success sources form for more details http://www.karmacyberintel.net/2012/01/megaupload-anonymous-hacker-retaliation-nobody-wins/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] Minimum Syslog Level Needed for Court Trial
On 12/9/2011 1:39 PM, phocean wrote:
Oh boy! I can't believe someone can be insane to the point of writing
like that.
Netdev, do you expect that people are going to spend more than 2 secs
reading it?
What's wrong with *so many* people on this list?
Thanks god there is sieve :
elsif anyof(
...
header :contains From sec...@gmail.com
) {
discard;
}
In Texas they'd have taken N3tD3v out back years ago and shot him as
unfixably defective.
Andrew
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] Contact for reporting Facebook vulnerability
On 6/11/2011 2:51 PM, Madhur Ahuja wrote: Does anyone know where I can report vulnerabilities in Facebook ? Thanks, Madhur ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ Right here, simply reply to this e-mail. Andrew ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] Contact for reporting Facebook vulnerability
On 6/11/2011 2:51 PM, Madhur Ahuja wrote: Does anyone know where I can report vulnerabilities in Facebook ? Thanks, Madhur ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ err reply list (if reply goes to me I'll forward) ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] Contact for reporting Facebook vulnerability
Nah, report it here, bleach the hat later. On 6/11/2011 3:12 PM, Madhur Ahuja wrote: Shouldn't I first report to Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=white_hat ? On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Andrew D Kirchtrel...@trelane.net wrote: On 6/11/2011 2:51 PM, Madhur Ahuja wrote: Does anyone know where I can report vulnerabilities in Facebook ? Thanks, Madhur ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ Right here, simply reply to this e-mail. Andrew ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] LulzSec EXPOSED!
A back door with s***ty code On 6/9/2011 4:43 AM, McGhee, Eddie wrote: Lol wtf is a bugdoor hahaha -Original Message- From: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jen Savage Sent: 07 June 2011 00:09 To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] LulzSec EXPOSED! ooo ooo speculation time! - Hacker creates website that offers free online password management - in javascript - bugdoors it - collects passwords - uses passwords TL;DR: over 9000 lulz were had -Jen On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:26 AM, T Biehntbi...@gmail.com wrote: LOL @ A timing attack on ssh passwords over the net? and I think its just a bruteforce. -Travis On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Gichuki John Chuksjonia chuksjo...@gmail.com wrote: I think its just a bruteforce. On 6/6/11, Andreas Bogkandr...@andreas.org wrote: Excerpts from lulzfail's message of Mo Jun 06 08:39:42 +0200 2011: Lulzsec == pwnt I've seen the log you pasted to pastebin. Is this: * A timing attack on ssh passwords over the net? * Fake, to distract us from your real 0day? Andreas ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
[Full-disclosure] Freenode's ACTUAL policy on your project
It seems that Freenode's policy regarding projects that they host is that THEY control who you identify as members of your project. Also if you ask them to cloak someone they don't want to cloak, you will be silenced, as seen below. Incidentally kloeri is a volunteer for the Exherbo project referenced below. Note the timestamps, and the delay before I was pointlessly silenced. == FreeNode-#freenode.log == Jun 25 03:29:47 trelanejayne, a decision about _MY_ namespace? Jun 25 03:30:23 trelanebazhang, I haven't seen that it's in-evidence that this user has any bans placed against him Jun 25 03:30:24 tsimpsontrelane: a cloak decision has nothing to do with your namespace Jun 25 03:30:33 kloeritrelane: stop being so dramatic - it's about whether we're going to cloak that user or not, not about your namespace Jun 25 03:30:35 trelanetsimpson, this is a funtoo/ cloak, not an unaffiliated cloak Jun 25 03:30:43 tsimpsontrelane: it's still a cloak Jun 25 03:31:00 trelanetsimpson, which takes 10-15 seconds to set? Jun 25 03:31:18 trelaneI don't see any sort of justification for a claim that it requires a massive amount of volunteer resources, however I will grant that staff's time is volunteered Jun 25 03:32:22 HeisSpiterThe discussion has produced any progress since it's been started... 30 minutes ago Jun 25 03:32:23 *BTouch has quit (Quit: i'm) Jun 25 03:32:29 tsimpsonit's a staff decision if a cloak should be set at all, regardless of what type of cloak Jun 25 03:32:31 HeisSpiterYou should consider giving up for the moment trelane Jun 25 03:32:39 HeisSpiterUntill they give their decision Jun 25 03:32:48 HeisSpiterYou can't do anything without their approval, so... Jun 25 03:33:17 ProdegoI'm sure there is a good reason trelane Jun 25 03:35:24 trelaneProdego, a good reason is insufficient in this case as what's been said here is that freenode reserves the right to meddle in my project, this is somewhat concerning, and clarification of such a statement should be immediately forthcoming Jun 25 03:36:01 HeisSpiter~ Jun 25 03:36:01 ProdegoI'd suggest using your own irc network if you want complete control over network functions like userhosts Jun 25 03:36:19 sauvintrelane, all freenode cloaks are subject to freenode staffers' discretion. Get over it. Jun 25 03:36:36 kloeritrelane: please drop it Jun 25 03:36:51 trelanesauvin, my problem is that I have _NEVER_ seen that documented anywhere Jun 25 03:36:55 Saul_GoodmanI'd wonder how canonical would feel if staffers had issues with some of their members and would not cloak them Jun 25 03:36:56 Prodegokloeri: that was sort of my fault, apologies Jun 25 03:36:59 trelaneas requested I will be dropping this and addressing it with tomaw tomorrow Jun 25 03:37:20 trelaneSaul_Goodman, considering the issues between exherbo and Gentoo staffers, and the number of exherbo users on staff... Jun 25 03:37:22 jayneSaul_Goodman: it's happened, and they were quite accomodating Jun 25 03:37:26 trelaneI'd think Gentoo Foundation would have more concerns Jun 25 03:39:24 *kloeri sets mode +q #freenode trelan...@* ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
