Re: [Full-disclosure] Kazaa
Other than removing Kazaa and preventing installation, how else can I block it from being used? At the firewall, with some additonal programming. There was an article in one of the Linux Magazines - LinuxJournal? - some time ago. Dont have the Mag. to hand. Perhaps it can be found online? There are various modes, designed to evade trivial block rules. The article examines the protocols in detail and describes how to defeat it completely. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
[Full-disclosure] Advisory % x Thu Mar 16 21:02:20 EST 2006 x % DoS Vulnerability in Apple MacOSX
Advisory % x Thu Mar 16 21:02:20 EST 2006 x % DoS Vulnerability in Apple MacOSX + I. VENDOR RESPONSE Apple MacOSX had offered no identified commentary. + APPENDIX A VENDOR INFORMATION http://www.apple.com/macosx/ + APPENDIX B REFERENCES RFC 8995 + CONTACT James_gmail-ij [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1-888-565-9428 BEWARE THE JIZZTAPO!!! .. _ .' `. /\) / / / / /\ \ \ / \ _ \ \/ /\ \ (/\ \ / \ \ \ \ / \ (Y ) \ \/ /\ \ \ / \ \ \/ / / / / ( Y) GSAE CEH SSP-CNSA SSP-MPA GIPS GWAS CAP SSCP ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] personal apology
On 04/03/06, Anders B Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) Allowing a windows box Internet access? Get real. I quit believing header information a LONG time ago. Maybe it suits him for people to believe it, real *or* forged... ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] J. A. Terranson
On 28/08/05, KF (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great... thanks for the extra commentary. Now how about you both STFU [..] Perhaps... just lose the ego boosting at the expense of other list members, contributors and lurkers alike? The saddest part is that most parties actually do have valuable experience and knowledge to contribute to the high levels of professionalism that usually found here. But people wont take them as seriously as their skills, experience, and knowledge deserve. We all learn more from constructive peer review of mistakes. One tool contributor that stimulated a LOT of valuable insights is unlikely to volunteer stuff here again because of the way people ripped into him. Its fine to be right about something, even when everyone else *is* ignorant or misguided. The mark of a professional is stimulating scientific debate to produce better understanding for all. Save the flaming for UseNet unmoderated groups and ( if you must ) private email. Passion is fine. Just direct it with rational thoughts about what you hope to achieve socially by its expression! It aint just about what you do. Its how you do it. Process not product. A concept that security professionals understand already. I want to hear from you *all*, OK? But play nice or corrective measures are likely to be applied ( logic: I have no say in this matter ). If that happens, then everyone loses. It denies Full disclosure and makes hypocrites of us all! ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
