Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
You're like a shite that won't flush away. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] u arent getting it. it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any system, patched or not. pay attention. I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored here. The text of the statement said remote searches which in legal terms could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files available through P2P to full remote system access. Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other than this statement? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
pot kettle black On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:34 AM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're like a shite that won't flush away. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] u arent getting it. it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any system, patched or not. pay attention. I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored here. The text of the statement said remote searches which in legal terms could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files available through P2P to full remote system access. Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other than this statement? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
If there's a peace of shit around here that should be flushed, it's only you n3tcr4p No one like you, get the fuck back on your kiddie mailing list/group. 2008/12/3 n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're like a shite that won't flush away. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] u arent getting it. it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any system, patched or not. pay attention. I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored here. The text of the statement said remote searches which in legal terms could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files available through P2P to full remote system access. Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other than this statement? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
There are no kiddies on the group and any that appear get banned. On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:28 PM, j-f sentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there's a peace of shit around here that should be flushed, it's only you n3tcr4p No one like you, get the fuck back on your kiddie mailing list/group. 2008/12/3 n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're like a shite that won't flush away. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] u arent getting it. it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any system, patched or not. pay attention. I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored here. The text of the statement said remote searches which in legal terms could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files available through P2P to full remote system access. Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other than this statement? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
all speculation: no 1 knows 4 sure. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257from=rss http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article w/out stealing ppls work. pay attention. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Ureleet [EMAIL PROTECTED] u arent getting it. it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any system, patched or not. pay attention. I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored here. The text of the statement said remote searches which in legal terms could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files available through P2P to full remote system access. Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other than this statement? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
If they use zero-day exploits then thats illegal. Secondly, are they using zero-day exploits post on public mailing lists or using their own home grown exploits that the bad guys and potentially the vendor doesn't know about? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: proof, did you read the article ? They are after your bad guys and probably using zero day exploits !? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:13 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7758127.stm ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
Which court order? Post a link. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably not with a court order. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:51 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If they use zero-day exploits then thats illegal. Secondly, are they using zero-day exploits post on public mailing lists or using their own home grown exploits that the bad guys and potentially the vendor doesn't know about? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: proof, did you read the article ? They are after your bad guys and probably using zero day exploits !? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:13 PM, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7758127.stm ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
