Your note of 01/16/2000, Re: Subsidiarity and the Basic Income

2000-01-19 Thread WesBurt

To: John Vandenberg and friends on several mail lists.

Many thanks, John, for sending me the executive summary of 
the article by Lucy Sullivan entitled, "Tax Injustice: Keeping the 
family cap-in-hand," which can be found at www.cis.org.au 
in the Issues Analysis section.  I found Ms. Sullivan's analysis 
very compelling and was pleased to see the specific 
recommendation at the end, where she wrote:


 "A tax rebate (or payment) of $3,000 to $5,000 per 
dependent child or student, matching child benefits for the 
unemployed, is recommended, to replace all current family 
benefits, including childcare subsidies and Austudy."


Ms. Sullivan may have reached too far when she included Austudy.
A while back I received a related dialogue concerning the educational 
side of the tax equation in Australia which you will find below.  Both 
articles are an exercise in measuring-well-being and finding out that 
we have too little well-being, but not enough political fortitude to do 
anything about it.

The problem is not unique to Australia, Thomas Paine and William Pitt
proposed adequate family allowances as an alternative to the 
Speenhamland System in 1795.  Two hundred years later, none of 
the English speaking people have seen fit to preserve and maintain the 
family allowances (relative to average earned income) which were 
established by all industrial nations, except the UK and US, after 
World War II.

Thanks again for the insight into Australian politics.

Kind regards,

Wesburt

XXX  Begin dialogue  XXX
Subj:[auspolitics] Educational Allowances
Date:   99-11-02 00:52:42 EST
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rhianwen) + Téa-Louise Smith + Rhianwen
Reply-to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Rhianwen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 There are quite a few differences in the educational
assistance schemes given to students, Austudy and
Abstudy, and I believe it to be unfair. Bear in mind
that these additional benefits are in addition to the
living allowance granted to students.

ABSTUDY   
(income tests sometimes apply)

AUSTUDY
(income tests, assets tests, and actual means tests
always apply)

ABSTUDY School fees allowance (non-taxable)

Under 16   * $150 a year 
* $75 a year if turning 16 before June 30
* $4,204 if homeless or orphaned

AUSTUDY 
School fees allowance

Scheme does not exist!

* if homeless or orphaned, _may_  get rent assistance.

ABSTUDY School term allowance

Under 16  
* $520 a year
* Turning 16 during year, entitlement up to 16th
birthday

AUSTUDY School Term Allowance

Scheme does not exist!

ABSTUDY School/Hostel Directed Boarding allowance

Under 13 
* $988 a term
* 13-15 $426

AUSTUDY School/Hostel Directed Boarding Allowance

Scheme does not exist!

ABSTUDY Fares allowance
(no restrictions, includes accommodation and meals)

Actual costs paid to cover-
* Secondary students eligible for away from home
assistance
* Full time tertiary students, including Masters and
Doctorates
* Part time tertiary students required to attend an
activity away from base.

Type of travel covered-
Secondary students

* to and from school at the beginning and end of
term(unlimited)
* travel in connection with successful placement at a
new boarding location (unlimited)
* for correspondence student to take part in
compulsory residential schools (unlimited)

Tertiary students

* beginning and end of course
* for courses of more than one semester (17-23 weeks),
a return trip during the year.
* Exam travel (for a supplementary exam or one held
away from normal base of study)
* Graduation travel, if completing equivalent to two
year full time course or a post graduate course.

AUSTUDY 

Fares allowance (restrictions apply)
Actual costs paid to cover
* independent tertiary students only

Type of travel covered-
Secondary students
 
Scheme does not exist!

Tertiary students
* beginning and end of course
* for courses of more than six months, a return trip
during the year
* for correspondence students to take part in one only
residential school requirement

ABSTUDY Other travel

* compassionate travel (i.e. critical illness, injury,
death or funeral of an immediate family member) 

AUSTUDY Other travel
Scheme does not exist!

ABSTUDY Assistance to attend away from base activities

Actual costs paid to cover-
* testing and assessment programs
* residential schools
* field trips
* placements

AUSTUDY Assistance to Attend away from base activities
Scheme does not exist!

ABSTUDY Incidentals allowance
Payable to-

* over 18 secondary students
* full time and part time tertiary students
* Doctorate students

Rates
* $49 (less than 12 weeks)
* $86 (12-16 weeks)
* $172 (17-23 weeks)
* $341 (24+ weeks)

AUSTUDY Incidentals Allowance
Scheme does not exist!

ABSTUDY Additional incidentals allowance
Payable to-

* full time tertiary, Masters and Doctorate students
who spent more than the above prescibed amounts

Rates
* $88 (less than 12 weeks)
* $175 (12-16 weeks)
* $349 

Subsidiarity and the Basic Income

2000-01-17 Thread WesBurt


To: A few friends, a few lurking innocents, many devious defenders 
of the status quo (DDotSQ), and assorted classic academics on 
several mail lists.

Dear friends,

Please accept my sincere apologies for wasting your time, and for 
putting your interest in my subject at risk, with my wholly unnecessary 
response to the Australian DDotSQ.  He was only doing his job, and 
all too well, but my job went begging while I foolishly responded to his 
ad hominem attack.  An attack which was "distinct from any legitimate 
sort of pertinent argument or refutation, and disallowed in debate," 
according to Aaron Agassi on list [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Now, back to promoting the general welfare, which is the special 
common denominator of several mail list owners who continue to 
distribute my posts.  

A previous post identified one of my favorite Christmas presents as 
the term: "noosphere" by way of Teilhard DE Chardin, Robert 
Theobald, and Paul Swann owner and moderator of list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].  The term "noospheres" was not as 
helpful as I had hoped.  It is a little flaky, and prone to be ridiculed 
by rednecks and libertarians.  So I was doubly blessed to get, as a 
New Year's present, a more down-to-earth term: "thinking envelope 
of the Earth," also from Teilhard DE Chardin, but by way of Robert 
Wright, and Billy Grassie owner and moderator of list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] where my posts have been 
proscribed since 98-12-02.

Author Robert Wright, a contributing editor at The New Republic, 
Time magazine, and Slate, has posted his new book, NONZERO: 
THE LOGIC OF HUMAN DESTINY, at URL 
http://www.nonzero.org/app1.htm.  His theme is, that social 
development follows a "nonzero" path, rather than a "zerosum" path, 
and thereby assures a slow but ever upward trend for the complexity 
and quality of human society.  This theme confirms again Spinoza's 
1670 universal law of human nature: that people, when free to choose, 
will choose the lessor of the evils and the greatest of the goods which 
confront them, thereby slowly but continuously improving their general 
welfare.  I don't remember what, if anything, DE Chardin said about 
Spinoza, but it is certain that Robert Theobald and Robert Wilson 
shared DE Chardin's vision of a "noosphere" or "thinking envelope of 
the Earth," a network which guides or regulates the activities of all 
actors, capital or human, in the society covered by the particular 
"noosphere" or "thinking envelope of the Earth."  

My own narrow experience of 75 years on this planet has provided 
insight into only two such regulating mechanisms.  

The first one is the hardwired time-error system for dispatching the 
production of electric power on the international power grid which is 
bounded on the West by Texas, on the North by Hudson's Bay, on 
the East by Cape Cod, and on the South by Key west, FL.  On average, 
about half of the connected capacity will be unemployed, but 90%, or 
more, of connected capacity will be fully loaded when consumers 
present their peak demand.  In real time, of course, demand is always 
at the discretion of the consumers of electric power and the function of 
the dispatching equipment is first to preserve the stability of the whole 
system and then to preserve the energy balance between demand and 
supply with a minimum fuel input to the power system at every level of 
production.  

Here is Adam Smith's "invisible hand" hard at work.  From an airliner at 
30,000 feet, the power grid, containing both the regulating intelligence 
and the product, is invisible.  The plants are only barely visible on a 
clear day, and the consumers are spread over the earth like a coat of 
paint. Here is a real "noosphere," indeed.

The second such regulating mechanism, of course, is the market price
mechanism of every free society.  This  "noosphere" is a soft network 
of linkages between the actors, capital or human, in the society regulated 
by the applicable "noosphere" or "thinking envelope of the Earth"  We 
should think of this "noosphere" or "thinking envelope of the Earth" as 
historically restricted in extent by local or national boundaries, but 
presently overflowing those geographical restrictions as globalization 
evolves under the influence of the Internet and other advanced methods 
of communication and transportation.  This vision of a regulating 
influence gives a more hopeful meaning to the term "world governance," 
as meaning self-regulation by Divine Law, by the Twelve Moral 
Commandments, or by the Rule of Law.  This is a more acceptable 
vision by far than the coercive meaning of World Government according 
to the New World Order.

We should also think of this soft "noosphere" or "thinking envelope of
 the Earth" as a multitude of nested envelopes, with each envelope 
defining the price of a particular commodity in dollars per unit of value, 
just as the single hardwired "noosphere" above defines the price of one
particular commodity, electric power, in